The transcript explores multiple interconnected themes surrounding Donald Trump’s personal habits, political alliances, and administration. It begins with a call to action for overseas voters to request ballots, emphasizing civic participation. Trump’s hair maintenance is detailed through the use of a patch kit, drawing a parallel to Nixon’s “I am not a crook” defense, highlighting a pattern of denial and self-justification. The visit of Jared Kushner and Steve Wynn to Moscow fuels speculation about an unusual relationship between Trump and Vladimir Putin, with questions about political leverage and mutual interests. Trump’s decision to fly on an insecure plane is criticized as contradictory to his stated security priorities, suggesting a focus on image and status. Maria Bartoromo’s departure from Fox News is framed as a result of internal tensions over election fraud coverage, possibly indicating a broader shift in media politics. Major construction projects like the Trump White House ballroom and the triumphal arch face legal challenges, underscoring ongoing resistance to Trump’s expansionist vision. Financially, the administration is portrayed as prioritizing personal wealth, with billions raised from donors and crypto. The Pentagon’s internal crisis, including 50 officials undergoing lie detector tests, reflects widespread institutional dysfunction and a crisis of trust. These elements collectively paint a picture of a presidency driven by personal ambition, symbolic power, and a pattern of defiance—both in public discourse and behind the scenes—fueling questions about governance, integrity, and long-term consequences.
US voters abroad. Have you got your ballot yet? All States are now sending ballots to overseas voters. So if you want to vote this year, you should request your ballot right away. Go to votefromabraud.org and click "Request My Ballot" as to receive it by email. Questions? Ask our support team directly. Don't miss this chance to shape the future. Don't delay. Votefromabraud.org. It is almost only equivocally not a wig. He has what are called patches. And they call it the patch kit. And the patch kit is little, you know, small tufts of hair that match whatever color his hair might be at the time. The patches are, you know, they're stuck with some kind of paste. So they're pretty secure. But also, just the fact if Trump says it's not a wig, which reminded me of, remember Nixon saying, I am not a crook. He does a lot of this himself, the hair maintenance. But then he has somebody who's following and there have been a couple of people over, certainly over the political years, who've carried the patch kit. They are next to the people who carry the nuclear codes. Michael. Joanna. It's Labor Day weekend. And yet there is no rest for us, Michael, because we have a lot to discuss. Steve Wyckoff and Jared Kushner have just arrived in Moscow. Moscow, as we call it, actually in the UK, but I actually like Moscow, the American pronunciation. We've got, why is Donald Trump insisting on flying on the Katari plane, even though he knows it's not secure enough? We have Melania refusing to attend his mini RNC in the run up to the midterms, though Natalie Hart looks like she is going to be in full attendance. And we've got work on the triumphal arch. Will it begin in the next two weeks? Will the courts suspend it? I can't wait to get into it. What is wrong with this, Michael? We would rather nerd out on this stuff than you be picnicking on 2 mile hollow beach without the hum of a data center within 100 miles of you. 2 mile harbor beach. No, it's 2 mile hollow beach, not 2 mile harbor. No, it's 2 mile hollow. It's 2 mile hollow, my friend. I've been going there for 30 years. I thought you went to Connecticut for 30 years. I don't think you've been in the United States for 30 years. Have you? I have 30 years next year, actually. But I did come before then. I came for sneak peeks of what would turn out to be my life. Well, anyway, and in Labor Day, we are just waiting for the people who finance the data centers to leave us in peace here. So we don't have the data centers, but we have the people who pay for the data centers. Well, they will go home as of Tuesday. Yes, they will all go home and instead of taking 15 minutes for me to get my coffee in the morning, it will take one minute. You could just make your own coffee, Michael. Yes, but then I like to go out and smell the air. That's why we're out here in the Hamptons. That's why you're out there. Okay. So for those of you who are joining this podcast for the first time, it's inside Trump's head with the author, Michael Wolfe, of many, many books, but four books about Donald Trump and two about Rupert Murdoch, who's salient in our thrice weekly conversations where we go inside Trump's head. Michael, do you want to explain our POV? I will, but in Rupert, we'll be relevant today because we're, I think we should talk about Maria Bartoromo and her swift exit from Fox News. Do you think Scott Jennings is freaking out right now because Maria, having left Fox in, how should we say, inconclusive circumstances is headed straight for the White House press podium? Is she going to be the new White House press secretary? I would say it was that she left in conclusive circumstances. And I'd say, you know, I don't know if I were Maria Bartoromo, would I want that job? That is a hard, hard job. So I don't know. Would she take that job? She's been offered that job before. So would she take it now? I don't know. But I don't think, I don't think Scott Jennings is going to get that job. I think it will be a woman who gets that job. Okay. Well, we can come on to that shortly and we're going to come on to, I know you have all sorts of history and thoughts with Maria, which I'm curious to get into, but I do have a question for you as a bald man. Do you have thoughts on trumps? Is it a wig? Is it not a wig? Well, I, you know, no, I mean, I know, I mean, he's, of course, in cystic, it's not, it's not a, not a wig. It is almost only equivocally not a wig because I know that they carry he has what are called patches and they call it the patch kit and the patch kit is little, you know, small tuffs of hair that match whatever color his hair might be at the time. And those are applied if, if needed and if necessary. So the maintenance of this hair is a major enterprise and has been for many years. In my first book in Fire and Fury, I describe Avanka, who was then, she had a kind of amused perspective on her, on her father. And she described the, the, the, the way that hair came together of having to, having to tease it in certain ways and having to pull it in certain ways and having to fluff it in certain ways. And so you kind of created this confection on top, which is, it does look like one of those spun sugar things that you can put your hand in and pull it out and start eating it. And it would have no calorific value whatsoever. But he insisted on Wednesday that he'd never worn a wig, it was not a wig. And as proof, he offered a speech he gave, in fact, in support of Bernie Moreno, the father-in-law of Max Miller, the congressman who is being accused of breaking his two-year-old's collarbone and threatening his wife with violence and determinedly still standing for congress. It all, it all comes together in the hair. All comes together. But Trump said, no, no, it's, it's, you know, it's not a wig and, you know, that was a very, very stormy windy night and my hair didn't blow off. Well, his hair didn't blow off because when we got the photos of the film, in fact, he was wearing a, one of his mega hats, which was pulled firmly down and probably velcroed around the back to his head. So they're, they're pretty secure. But also, just the fact, if Trump says it's not a wig, which reminded me of, remember, Nixon saying, saying, I am not a crook. And, you know, it, it, that's probably a pretty good indication if, if, if Trump is, is making a declaratory statement, then the opposite is probably true. But it is, you know, and would you call it a wig, these little patches? I, I don't, you know, this is, we're, we're in the, the nomenclature of hair. I wonder if Natalie Harp trots around with him sort of tending to his hair. Does it go to someone who looks after it, especially like a hair specialist? I'm sure the original concoction is that. But during the day, he can't be followed. Like, no, he doesn't really, it's not really a hair dresser per se. I mean, he does a lot of this himself, the hair maintenance. Well, the patch kit and the nuclear codes. Leaves aren't the only things changing this time of year. As the season shift, maybe you're thinking about making a change of your own. And finally, starting that business you've had in the back of your mind, it can feel overwhelming to figure out where to begin. But that's exactly where Shopify comes in. Shopify gives you everything you need to start, run and grow your business all in one place. It's templates and AI tools can get a stunning sight up and running fast with no coding needed. And if questions come up, Shopify's built in AI assistant sidekick can help you build troubleshoot and keep moving. Shopify checkout helps turn more shoppers into customers while making it easy for returning customers.
to buy again. And because Shopify handles so much of the setup, selling, and day-to-day management, you have more time to focus on actually growing your business. Shopify powers millions of businesses worldwide, from small businesses just getting started to household names. If you're ready to hear the of your first sale, head over to Shopify.com/dallybeast to start your free trial today. That's Shopify.com/dallybeast. So talking about nuclear codes, Jared Kushner and Steve Whitkov arrived in Moscow recently, shortly, a couple of hours ago, to carrying a new proposal, not carrying a patch kit, or maybe it's carrying a patch kit for the Moth Eaton efforts at trying to get peace between Russia and Ukraine. And they're having a sort of conference of sorts this weekend. Well, there's a couple of threads that I think come together here. I mean, curiously Putin said last week, he was, he was dissing, I think he was dissing the CIA director who had flown to Moscow to issue, what seems to be several warnings and to give cautionary advice to the Russians, which is to say, you're not going to win this war. And Putin dismissed that and dismissed the CIA director, but at the same time, praised Jared Kushner and Steve Whitkov, praised him as though he were, they were his friends. It kind of sound like his colleagues, which is brings back that other theme, that other Trump theme, which I think has, has been buried by so many other Trump themes, that there is a weird relationship between a clear relationship and a clearly weird relationship between Trump and Putin. Now, you will remember, perhaps in the first, although it is hard to remember, in the first administration, that was a central theme. You know, what was the collusion with Russia? And that was, we left that unresolved partly because, because Robert Mueller, who was leading that investigation, kind of both punted it and got too old to finish it. And then it was taken over by the Justice Department, which Trump's Justice Department, which whitewash the whole thing. But nevertheless, there is an enormous body of evidence about this, this weird, again, relationship between Trump and Putin. And it continues now to raise, constantly raise questions. Why is, why is Putin not being stopped in his tracks, both in his pursuit of the war in Ukraine, which as you recall, Trump was going to solve overnight. And now in his increasing, I mean, really stepping up on a day-by-day basis, his threats against Europe. I mean, threats, in a sense, that begin to destabilize the world order in ways that we haven't seen, I don't know, in my memory. So Joel Rackliffe went to see him, what, three weeks ago, four weeks ago, was the first time the head of the CIA had been to Russia since, before the Russia-Ukraine war, Trump dismissed the trip as, oh, this is routine, this is routine, CIA directors do this all the time, which is not true. Do you think Putin is trying to drive a wedge between the CIA and Steve Wickoff and Jared by shouting them out? Do you think he's trying to get Trump to fire, uh, John Rackliffe? What, what's his, or is he just being KGB-ish and devious and disruptive for the hell of it? Yeah, no, I think that he has a, I think he's sending some signal. So what is the signal? The signal is I want to do, I, I might do a deal with Donald Trump, and I'll do that through Donald Trump's guise. And, um, and, you know, the government and the, and the, I mean, the CIA and, you know, there's a lot of, a lot of different, different threads in any government, in different factions in any government. And there is certainly a strong faction in, in the United States government that says, you know, I mean, Ukraine is the good guys and the Russians are the bad guys. The person who I don't think sees the Russians as the bad guys consistently has not seen them as the bad guys is Donald Trump. And um, um, and Jared Kushner and Steve Wickoff, uh, both men are there representing, let's be very clear on this, representing not principally the United States government, but principally Donald Trump. So what's the relationship between these two guys? I used to sit around with Steve Bannon and, and, and, and, and we would speculate what does Putin have on Trump? Um, and I think that that's still after all these years is a, um, is a, is a, is a worthy question. What is that relationship about? I mean, Putin is, is one of the, you know, I mean, if you can, if you can isolate a really despicable figure in the, um, in the world power structure right now, it would be Vladimir Putin. I don't think there's any, uh, who would argue otherwise, except Donald Trump. Except Donald Trump is, of course, who'd say it's a great guy, great guy. Never but anyone like him is wonderful guy. Um, is it possible Trump just sees Russia as an enormous economic opportunity for himself? Um, well, I think Trump sees everything as an enormous economic opportunity for himself. Um, I think that that is probably at the, the one of the baselines of understanding the second Trump administration, uh, where's the big coming from? And, uh, so, yeah, probably, but I think that there's also something else. I mean, what has propelled this weird hands-off relationship with, and, in the context of this weird relationship? I mean, we don't have an answer to this. Um, um, you know, and this is, I mean, there's obviously been a lot of speculation and Steve Bannon is hilarious on the subject of, of, of all of the things that Putin might have on him, including his, um, his, his, um, college transcripts, which I was always quite fond of that, um, his, his, uh, his set of d's at the, um, at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Yeah, interesting. And, of course, he was married to two Eastern Europeans, two Ivana and Melania remains married to Melania, though, who knows how long for, and of course, Jared and Steve Wickoff are supposed to be going to the Ukraine tomorrow. Um, okay, well, we've, we've seen this, this little film before. We have, we have, how are they traveling by what plane do they take? That's a great question. I don't know. Maybe they take one of the spare Air Force ones, because Donald Trump is going to Dunebag, uh, Ireland, his golf course next weekend, I believe, and taking the Katari Gryft Force One, which, as we know, isn't yet fully secure, and I'm really curious as to know, why do you think he, why do you think he is so obsessed by that plane that he's prepared to compromise his safety by flying on it? Well, I have a few questions about that, because at the same time that he's flying in, in what is apparently an insecure plane, there is a greater lockdown of the White House ever before. Um, you know, you know, I mean, the Secret Service has always asked for greater and greater and greater security around the White House, because that's their job. Um, who gets blamed if there is any kind of breach, it's the Secret Service. How do you avoid that? You just put up more, more fences, you dig a moat around the White House. You do all of, all of the extreme things that you might do to protect the White House. Now, there's always been resistance against that, because this is America, this is a democracy, this is the people's house. Um, you know, if you look like you live in a, in a, in a, a fortified, in a fortress, that is, that, that begins to look like you against the people. Well, that is what is happening now at the White House in this, and this is, of course, part of the overall structure, the overall renovation of virtually everything about the White House.
White House turning it into Donald Trump's White House, the Donald J. Trump White House. Is this is this enhancement of virtually all security features at the same time he's taking this plane, this insecure plane to he's traveling on on this on this plane. So clearly the main issues here are not security. What are they? And again, with Donald Trump it is always the look. He wants to live in a fortress because he's the king. And he wants to be on a plane that he feels worthy of him. But how is it worthy of him if it's not secure enough? I mean, surely he would want to fly in the world's most fortified plane. Well, you know, and I have another thing because I another point about this that I was I was talking to some people. So he has the guitar E plane and all he does is complain about it because all all kinds of features are not right. The gold is not the right color gold. The seats are not comfortable enough. I mean, Donald Trump is fundamentally in everything he does a complainer. Nothing is nothing is is is right because it's not to his specifications. And he's a needler and he's a blamer. So that has been so the plane is better than the plane that that comes with the with the job. But nevertheless, it's not as good as he wants it to be and thinks it should be. Well, that's interesting. So he's looking at a gift horse in the mouth. I suppose yes. The gold apparently is very disturbing to him because it's what it's not gold. It's gold plated. It's the wrong shade of gold. It's just it's never gold. It's only ever the color of gold. And the color of gold is he has a particular idea of what the color of gold is. And it often doesn't and I suppose in this Matt in this instance, it doesn't match the gold. He was the gold that was painted on the plane. When you said the Donald J Trump White House, I was surprised that he hasn't already prepared that for the outside of the ballroom. The Donald J Trump ballroom sort of written up there. And I guess they that will happen. They just haven't submitted that in the plans. Right. And there is no ball. There is no wall to put that on yet. But as soon as there will be a walk, there's only steel girders. Right. But yeah, I without question and people within the White House and I kind of charted a kind of change of tone here that in the beginning of this ballroom adventure that was said somewhat sarcastically. Now it is not said sarcastically anymore. This is the Donald J Trump ballroom. And the assumption is it's going ahead. It will be finished. It will be the next president's worry to figure out what to do with it. And it will be forever a physical representation of Donald Trump attached to the people's house. And again, this has become fundamental to him. And I think part of the issue is he was, remember, he was thrown out of the White House once and left it in disgrace. Well, it's going to be very hard to get rid of him now because because his legacy will be will overwhelm the White House. So one of the things that he's doing in this thing is just really kind of crowding out the existing White House and and this and that so effectively de facto it is a White House will be a White House that he has built. And he's moving faster than the courts, which looks like he's going to try and do again with the tram full arch, which is supposed to be starting though there's supposed to be breaking ground on it in two weeks, although three veterans on Friday brought a case against it, saying that it's disruptive to the idea of Arlington Arlington cemetery, obviously in disrespectful. And so that will now start wending its way through the courts, but if you would imagine, I would imagine that will have the same problems before the Supreme Court as a recent ballroom suit was in the Supreme Court, the conservative members said, said about the plaintiffs, you don't have standing, it doesn't, it doesn't directly hurt you. And I would imagine that would be true about about about the veterans now, you might be if you are in Arlington cemetery, maybe, maybe that would give you better standing. And I mean, it's also possible that the White House ballroom gets built, he names it the Donald J Trump ballroom and then whoever comes in after him just takes the name off repurposes it and it becomes a useful space for something completely different and the occasional state, you know, that that is true, except for the fact that it will look like a Donald J Trump building. I mean, it is not, it is not as though this is just an expansion of the White House and it will always be there to say Donald Trump, it will always be garish vulgar and when you look at it, it will, it will say it will scream Donald Trump built me. And it is always part of, you know, you know, Donald Trump, you know, in a way, his long career is a is a fight about taste with him declaring that his taste is better than good taste. There was a nice piece in New York magazine, I think this past, this past week in which someone has, and someone has gotten an interview with Donald Trump about with him talking precisely about the ballroom. And he and he articulates his absolute no nothing view of taste and architecture and and his and his philosophy of why all of why he is the master of all of these things. Everybody else is wrong about about about taste, about proportion, about about anything that we might otherwise think is is is is is relevant to a fine building. And and this is his plan to create a garish monstrosity that we will always associate with Donald Trump. Yes, I think the piece in New York Mag was by a guy called Ben Terrace and what's funny is which actually rather a good name for someone who's writing about architecture, but he says that Trump keeps referring to the wrong kinds of columns too. And he's like, these are Doric when, in fact, they're current, but it was Donald Trump saying that he knew more about marble that it was going to have the best marble floor in the world because only he knows about marble. I mean, this this obsession that Trump has about always being the smartest guy in the room and what a terrible burden that is to feel that you must be that person. Well, I when you can't possibly be that person. I wouldn't look at it like that. I would say it's the triumph of the dumbest man in the room. I mean, he is always the dumbest man in the room because he knows nothing doesn't want to know anything walks out of the room when anyone tells him something and and and yet has the confidence. I mean, the president of the United States, this somehow work, work to keep saying he's the smartest man in the room. Yeah, yeah, he says at one point in the New York magazine piece when he's talking about marble, he says, I know more about stone than anybody imaginable. And you know, of course you don't, of course you don't. Yeah, but it's sort of well, you're right. I get that it's the triumph of the dumbest man, but does he not hear somewhere in the back of his head, please, God, he hears the mocking voices when he says things like that. I mean, who says something like I know more than anybody else in the world. I know more than anyone else imaginable who even thinks of something like that. It's so bizarre. Well, the guy who doesn't know, I mean, that's how if it's all compensation and it is all compensation, compensation, compensation. So then then what he recognizes is go to the max here does don't try to be like everybody else. That's what makes you nervous. But and if you then redefine the terms of the smartest person and redefine themselves against you being the smartest person. That's a, that's a supreme rhetorical trick. Well, it doesn't seem very smart to take a plane, even if you're taking it to your own golf course, Dunebag in Ireland, when you know that it's not secure. That said, why does it take Bowie?
12 years to come up with a new Air Force 1. I mean, Trump ordered two new Air Force ones in 2017 and they've said they won't be delivered with hot 2029. At which point he'll be out of office, so I slightly understand his desire to get his little hands, his short fingered vulgarian hands, on the freebie from Qatar, which we know he's going to keep after his presidency. He's not going to actually park it in his library for the public to see. I don't know anything about building airplanes, but I do know that at one point someone said to me, because I was, possibly I was vaguely interested at some moment in this, that building a plane, these kinds of, these kinds of planes at that kind of scale is like building a cathedral in the, in the 16th century. I don't know if that's true or not, but I remembered it. Well, building a cathedral in the 16th century took 100 years. Exactly. So I'm, so you're saying it's speedy, they've sped it up. Yeah. I just can't believe they can't figure something out faster than 12 years. Well, both, let me dare say, both you and I know nothing about building an airplane. True, but I do know something about trying to deliver something on time. You and I've both worked on deadlines. Why they can't, why they can't do it faster than that makes, well, it's, it's really odd. Also odd is the leaving of Fox News by Maria Bartirema. Was she fired? Was she not fired? A lawyer saying she absolutely wasn't fired. Everybody speculating that she was fired because she informed the White House that Fox News had told people in the run up to the midterms not to focus on Trump's claims that election fraud was wide scale. What say you? I hadn't seen that about her lawyer denying this because I don't think that there's any issue here. She was, she was told to get out of the building. Because her lawyer was saying she still works for Fox. Well, I'm sure she still has a contract and there's still negotiating all all that. But as far as I know, she's been, she's been taken off the air and that's it. So I would say she's, she's, she's been fired. Defend it, defenestrated. Defenestrated, which is a Putin thing really isn't it? Because defenestration, I think technically means you'll throw it out of the window. Indeed. Well, let's hope Putin wasn't behind that. But, but I don't really understand the trajectory of Maria Bartirema because at one point she was a serious correspondent. She was never a serious correspondent. She was, she was the, the last thing she was was a serious correspondent. What she was is a, is a significant figure in making business news a significant part of the, of the news business. And that happened in the 1990s when, when suddenly, I mean, money was everywhere. The tech was about to explode. CEOs were kind of, kind of the rock stars of the moment. And I mean, she was, and she was hired at CNBC. I think she was a producer at CNN. And then, and then she was hired at CNBC in, in its early years, when Roger Ailes, who would subsequently hire her at Fox, was then, he, he, he was the guy who started up CNBC, which, or what was, was then actually called America's talking, I believe. And America's talking, what a terrible title America's talking. But she was, I mean, you'd say she wasn't a, a serious correspondent. She was the first correspondent to report from the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. She's the only couple of Emmy awards. Yeah. And that is, yeah. Come, well, let's hold. Come on. You know, we can go through the list of people who won Emmy awards. This is a television award. It's, um, um, this is just about awarded for being on television. So, um, you know, I, I mean, I, I know. So I actually spent some time talking, I spent a lot of time talking to Roger Ailes about a lot of things. But, um, I remember once he told me, because I asked him about, about Maria, because she's famously stupid. Um, and, um, and I asked her why. Is she famously stupid? Famously, famously, you should talk to her sometime. It's like, oh my god. Um, just look at the vacancy in her eyes extraordinary. And at any rate, um, Roger said, said, I said, why did you, why, what's the Maria story? Why did you hire her? Um, and he said, because CEOs will want to fuck her. Um, so that's Roger Ailes in a nutshell that defines Roger Ailes. Meaning not literally that, but meaning that she had sex appeal that she was attractive. She could talk about money. You say she wasn't smart, but she clearly had a television star power, which is something of enormous value to someone like Roger Ailes or any television network. Yeah. I mean, she wasn't for the money honey for nothing. And she was more attractive than Lou Dobbs. She was called the money honey for exactly the reason that Roger defined there, which we will not repeat. Um, that was, uh, and, um, and that was Roger is a very smart television guy. He knew this. Um, he knew that that would be, that that would have an appeal, both to an audience and to the subject she was, she was writing about. But the problem with, with Maria Bartoromo is that she then became much more enamored with the subjects that she was writing about, then with her journalistic position as covering these, these people. So she became, among other things that she became famous for, she became famous for the, the very easy interviews. So she became a kind of PR extension of, of, um, of, of CEOs of, uh, well, sort of access journalism. Yes. Efforts to, if you wanted to enhance your, your, uh, reputation and your, um, uh, your profile as a CEO, you got an interview, you let, you, you agreed to an interview with Maria and she would give you softball questions and she would phone over you and she would make you seem like a star. This is, but if you, if you're a CEO and you accept an invitation like that, how does that help your, uh, how does that help your reputation or your leadership of the company if everybody knows that it's a softball interview and she's just an extension of the PR. I, you know, I don't think that that matters. It's television. Um, it's, it's, you, you go on television, you go on CNBC at that, at that time, and if you're a, a, a, a CEO and, um, and the one of the leading correspondents on the network treats you as a star. Well, that, that would make you a star. I'd actually, I don't, your question seems an odd one. Um, you know how this works. You know, this will accept that she becomes the star. She goes from being a reporter to actually be larger than the CEO's. Well, the ecosystem, in that ecosystem, yours, your, your, um, you become a greater star CEO because you've been interviewed by a star journalist. Um, right. The transition to that is what interests me. But, but what was her relationship with Donald Trump and the White House? Because at some point, she became really a sort of informal spokesperson for them. Uh, yeah. I mean, she's all, I mean, the, so the transition from, uh, from, uh, remember, she transitions from CNBC to then she goes to Fox business and, um, and, and Fox news. And, and that's really in a way, a transition of the CEO. So she would have been incredibly friendly with Donald Trump and conducted many interviews with Donald Trump when he was a business guy. And then so she transitioned then to when Donald Trump is now a political guy. I mean, her politics, I assume her politics are, you know, business oriented politics. But it's really about Donald Trump. And then it was so, so making that transition to Fox news. And she had really kind of her, her run at CNBC was, was, you know, coming to, I mean, she was no longer getting the ratings that she had at CNBC. So the, um, um, the offer to go to Fox business and Fox business was just starting up at that point. Um, and Fox news was an attractive one. And within the Fox ecosystem, um, there, there's only one ratings king at Fox. And that's Donald Trump. So she clearly understood that and then became, became close to and friendly with people in the White House. And she's not the only person at Fox News who has done that. Um, I mean, and. I mean, there is, so, and then she kind of runs into, into a difficulty during the post, in the post 2020 election, when Fox, Fox begins to support Trump's ridiculous accusations about, about why he lost the election and, and conspiracy of, of, of the voting machine makers and, I mean, all kinds of baloney, of course. And, uh, and that baloney then would cost Fox almost a billion dollars in a lawsuit against it. So, these are the, she's taking machines. Yes. So, she took a lot of, she took some of the heat on that. Other people took some of the heat. And I think that part of her leaving now, and so, and understanding that she leaves now because she supplied some an internal memo, uh, to the White House. Now, um, uh, people at Fox have been supplying internal memos to the White House since 2017. Um, is this a, is this a, a common thing at Fox News? Completely common. Um, the, uh, Fox News and the White House have in so many instances worked hand in hand. So, I'm sure poor Maria is kind of shocked that, that she is the one who's being called on the carpet for this. And, and, and what does this signify? Does this signify that Fox understands that the Republicans, uh, or the, the presidents got the worst poll ratings ever and that he's likely to lose the house and possibly the cell in November. It doesn't signify that at all. Um, what does this signify? What is signifies is two things that they probably wanted to get rid of Maria anyway. Um, and they have found a pretext for that. Um, and, and the other, the other side of that is a, you know, probably, uh, there's, there's a slightly new management turn at Fox News, which is to say that, um, 95 year old Rupert Murdock has has, you know, is, is stepping back. I mean, he often steps back in, but mostly on a day, day to day basis. And his son is, um, his son, Locklin is running things and probably, yes. So, so I mean, I think in that, in that sense, you're, you're, you're right that, um, that there's probably some view that, I mean, let's, let's start to be a little careful about this. Although I, I wouldn't, I wouldn't go heavy on that. And I would go heavier on, they wanted to get rid of Maria. But was there a particular reason you think was she a ratings downer? Was she, they just had enough of her, were CEOs saying, I don't want to come on and talk to Maria anymore. What do we, what do we think? I assume it's a ratings thing. It's, oh, I, I foxes ratings driven almost at every, at every point. And I would also say, you know, honestly, um, she's 60 years old now. And what Leslie star is 82? This is fox news. Have you seen the people, the women on fox news? Well, they all look the same. The women, do we have to, yeah, they don't look like they're 60. That's the point. Right. They don't look like they're 60. So you're saying you think Mariah Butterham was probably getting too old in the tooth for fox news. Yep. Well, she can go to CBS. She should join CBS. Um, you know, well, that, that's an interesting thing. It will there be a bleed in that direction. Well, you know, I once, um, I was, as I say, I was very friendly with Roger Ailes, who for all his despicableness was an incredibly good source. And, um, we should just remind people Roger Ailes started fox news. He was a long term TV exec who Murdoch, uh, chose to start fox news. Um, and he said, I remember that he once, he once said, if you come to work for fox news, you can never go back to, um, to the mainstream media. They'll never have you. Not true in the case of David Rhodes. David Rhodes worked at Fox News. And then when his brother Ben Rhodes looked like he was going to become Obama's, uh, one of Obama's close confidants, especially around foreign affairs, David moved from Fox News to become a head of news at CBS. He was not on camera. Oh, okay, not on. So it's about the people on camera. Yes. If you're identified as, as a Fox news person, then it is really hard to go back to, um, traditional news. And Roger Ailes may have been proven right, because do you remember the experiment they did with Shappard Smith, who was a fox anchor and went over to CNBC to create a new news, which actually I was quite excited about because it was seven o'clock, which seemed like a good time for a quick news, uh, download. And it was supposed to be straight down the middle. And it didn't last at all. I don't know if you watched it. And they went back to reruns of sharp time. Yes. Yes. It's interesting. I mean, the, the Maria and the Maria Barteromo Donald Trump relationship has been a long one. And they, um, I, you know, I think that they have, they kind of, uh, they kind of genuinely bonded. I mean, I mean, in, in, in, in the sense that they were, she was exactly the kind of interviewer that he liked. Um, and her subject was, was his subject. I mean, he likes to talk about, about, um, I mean, he believes that he is, he is a, um, well, the CEO, he plays on the apprentice is the character that he believes he is. And she helped cultivate that. She is actually one of the people responsible for the, the Donald Trump myth. Well, good luck to her then. Good luck to her Michael. Uh, and Melania has said she's not going to be going to the mini RNC summit that they're hosting next week, actually. Um, are you going to be attending? Yeah. Well, I just, I mean, I found that a kind of bullshit story because it kind of expressed surprise that she was not attending this when she doesn't attend anything. Well, she attended the, the, the main RNC one, I mean, well, well, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, that she attended it only, which, and I have detailed this in a way that comes, it's like, come on. Um, she, she refused to speak at the, she hadn't done anything for the entire two years of the campaign. She refused to speak at the RNC convention, the 2024 RNC convention. Nobody knew that she was going to show up until the last moment when she showed up and then she refused to sit next to her husband in the VIP box. Um, so I, I would say that, uh, that the expectation that she would show up at this non convention, mini convention or whatever they're, they're, they're calling it is, um, is some, uh, just profound misunderstanding of what's been going on with, with, uh, with her relationship to her husband with, um, with what her past practices in terms of political campaigning and events. So I, I don't know what everybody's talking about here. Of course, she wouldn't show up. And I always remember the RNC of when she does show up at his side, he just looked incredulous, incredulous that she was there, which I always saved at that moment. But, uh, his cabinet are apparently under a three line whip to attend. Most of them will be there, including our friend, Heggers. Uh, I want to go back. I want to start. I, I just want to go back because I want to say, why would I think this was particularly, uh, I, I saw the Washington Post story. Um, why would they be treat this as though it were, what's the message here? They know the Washington Post knows that she isn't going to show up, that if she did show up, that that, that would, that would be the story. The story is not that she doesn't show up. What, what point are they trying to make or, and why wouldn't they say, well, she's obvious, she's obviously not going to show up because she never shows up. And, um, um, and this is not only not a departure, but just another indication of a broken marriage. What, uh, you asked me why the Washington Post didn't, I had no idea. I've no idea. I, I mean, why don't they, they understand what reality is. Why don't they express it? What's the thing? So we're trying to carry favor with the White House. We're trying not to say what we know. We're trying not to, um, out of some kind of discretion and courtesy. We're trying to avoid this, the central fact in this story.
Sorry, I'm just. Well, Washington Post owned by Jeff Bezos, Jeff Bezos is Amazon is behind her movie Melania and behind her new series, right, which is coming up soon. So perhaps they perhaps they'd like her to attend, say that she could promote her new show for them. I'm kind of gripped by what is going to be the content of a new show. I must admit, but his cabinet will be attending, but it turns out that a lot of Republican, uh, Republican candidates are not going to be going because it's the furthest thing they want to attend, given the problems they're facing in the midterms. Where is this convention taking place? Dallas. We should go. We should go to a podcast from Dallas, actually, honestly, we should. Jesus, do you think they would let us on the floor? I do not. Well, you know, who knows who knows? You know, inside Trump's head, they might want to come on a journey where this inside Trump said, I'm sure, let me put, if we paid, if we paid, well, we should find out how much it is. Someone somewhere is making money from it. I heard that the, that the Kennedy Center back to that old one. The Trump, Trump attended the, has attended only one event at the Kennedy Center. And, um, and, and you could sit beside him. There was a fee to sit beside him. Um, and that fee, which everybody thought was going to the Kennedy Center was not, it went to directly to a Trump, the Trump pack, which is directly to Trump. So the 400 million, it was part of the 400 million sitting on which Republicans hope he's going to distribute to challenge candidates. But in fact, he's probably going to keep for the Trump library. I, and that 400, that 400 million, by the way, is distinct from the 800 million, which he has solicited from, from, of full array of corporate donors. So all of this money does the 800 million include money for the ballroom. No. So that's the ballroom money, so he's got 800 million, which has been raised by his princess of darkness, Megan O'Rourke. And then he's got 400 million, you have all of the pack money. Yeah, all of the pack money. So all of this money goes with him when he, when he departs the White House, when he returns to Mar-a-Lago, sets up what will invariably be a competing White House. That's what will, that, that competing White House will be financed by this money. And then he's, he's made what two billion from crypto, 2.2 billion last year in the White House. So he, the boy done good, he's, he's helping himself. No, I think we should come back, we should come back to this in, in, in a separate episode, because I think it's, it's something that isn't, hasn't quite been focused on that the entire point of the second administration has been to, um, to make as much money for Donald Trump as he possibly could. Okay, well, that's a good subject for our limerick writers. We've got a very good one from Paul Watson, 8809. There is a man, this is referring to our last conversation about Pete Hegzer. There is a man called Push Up Pete, who's purging the fighting elite, replacing real heroes with boot-licking zeroes as ethics get tossed to the street. Thought it was rather suitable for the Pentagon under Pete. And of course, headline today that 50 people in the Pentagon have been required to take lie detector tests to see if they are the ones that have been leaking information that the Pentagon is running out of munitions, that they've been spreading word about Pete Hegzer's lack of competence. And yeah, go on. Well, I was going to say, so the question is, is this haggers doing Trump's bidding, or is this haggers panicking because he thinks that Trump is going to fire him? I took it as haggers panicking. I mean, a former general told, I think it was the Times, they'd never seen anything like this on this scale, 50 people. And of course, from the Secretary of Forever Wars, who put out classified war plans, one of the first things he ended up doing on signal leading to signal gate with Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor of the Atlantic on the chain. I mean, the idea, the irony of it, the irony of it, Michael, is incompetence. It's just, you know, it's a limpian level incompetence. They should open a new sport specifically for Trumpian cabinet members. But it's so hard to express this. We say, a limpian level incompetence. And that doesn't remotely begin to evoke a day by day breakdown of the entire management structure of the Pentagon, the United States Defense Department, the Pentagon, the military industrial complex, all breaking down as we sit at the moment of the world at a kind of a terrifying tipping point. Yeah, it's one of those moments that future school children all being well will learn about in the history books. I mean, it's literally things our start are not working. There's no army secretary. There's no chief of staff to the army secretary. It's a vacuum at the head of of the army. It's it's beggars belief. Well, you know, push up Pete and Colonel vodka. We can just let's let's just just begin to listen. Yeah, push up Pete and well, and I think isn't he called no tab peak because he never had a tab on his arm. We had a piece today in the beast about it that he's got a new is his nickname within military circles is no tab peak because he didn't have anything that he could put on his arm to show his his service. Poor Pete, he must just be crushed. I totally read it that he was panicking and and flexing and saying, you know, anybody who leaks will be put under a lie detector test, which made me wonder, could you pass a lie detector test? No, I couldn't. I really could not pass a lie detector test. I mean, if the Trump people and and of course, you know, that's that's I mean, I mean, I've I've there are variations of this in which I've clearly worried about because, you know, if asked, if put in a position, well, I'm never going to take a lie detector. So it doesn't make that that's not really germane, but but people leak to me. Meaning that you might be put under pressure to take a lie detector test. Well, I don't think I can be put under pressure, but but there is, I mean, I think that there are a number of people who would be, I mean, I hope they they avoid taking a lie detector test. Well, it'll be interesting to see the results of the 50 people taking lie detector test. It seems to me a very strange thing to assume that a machine can tell that you're lying or not lying. Well, it's they can. They're they're pretty good at it. Well, it's to do with your heart rate, right? I've always thought that they are the most bizarre things. A lie detector test. Also, people convince themselves they're telling the truth and believe that they're telling the truth. So can you get that through a lie detector test? I mean, can a sociopath pass one? Do you really want to have a conversation about lie detectors? Well, I'm curious about the fact that they're being, you know, wielded as a weapon in the Department of Forever Wars. As they have been for as they have been for about 70 years, but not at this level, not at this level, even with this degree of serenity. No, no, no, no, no, already. This is fine. Actually, that's that's not true. I mean, lie detectors are used throughout the the security agencies of the of the US government on a on a, you know, on a constant and regular basis. I mean, almost, you know, both both within certainly the FBI uses them on their own people often the national security agency. I mean, this is this is this is this is straight forward the way the government does. I don't think 50 people being given one because the secretary of forever wars is furious about leaking about his department. I don't think 50 have been. Well, these are people. I actually at a fairly high level. I think that's what's that's what's particularly notable about it. But then the the interesting thing is, is this Donald Trump saying saying, you know, I want to know who leaked this? Is this is he storming around and demanding this or is Pete Hegsith worried that he he has to find someone
blame. So this is the beginning to blame him for leading him into a war that they can't figure out how to get out of. And again, you know, is he, is he going to be fired? Is he running for president? Are there those mutually exclusive or two of the same things item? Well, something for everybody to contemplate over the day weekend, we'll be back on Tuesday with more questions about what an earth is going on inside Donald Trump's head. Well, Michael, have a very good rest of your Labor Day weekend. Big thanks to our production team, Ryan Murray, John Romero, Rachel Passe, Heather Posaro, and Neil Rosenhouse. So the good news is we have so many bee-beast tier members now. There are too many names to read out and we really appreciate your support.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Overseas voters should request their ballots immediately through votefromabraud.org to ensure timely receipt.
Donald Trump’s hair is maintained using a patch kit, with patches applied to match his hair color, and the practice is compared to Nixon’s claim of not being a crook.
Jared Kushner and Steve Wynn have arrived in Moscow, raising speculation about a potential Trump-Putin relationship and underlying political ties.
Trump’s insistence on flying in the unsecured Katari plane contradicts his emphasis on security, suggesting a desire for symbolic power over safety.
Maria Bartoromo left Fox News amid controversy over sharing internal memos about election fraud claims, with speculation that she was fired for political reasons.
The proposed Trump White House ballroom and the "triumphal arch" face legal challenges over their impact on Arlington National Cemetery.
Trump’s administration is seen as driven by personal gain, with significant financial inflows from corporate donations and crypto, not policy.
The Pentagon is under scrutiny, with 50 officials reportedly undergoing lie detector tests, signaling deep institutional instability and distrust.
Summary:
The transcript explores multiple interconnected themes surrounding Donald Trump’s personal habits, political alliances, and administration. It begins with a call to action for overseas voters to request ballots, emphasizing civic participation. Trump’s hair maintenance is detailed through the use of a patch kit, drawing a parallel to Nixon’s “I am not a crook” defense, highlighting a pattern of denial and self-justification.
The visit of Jared Kushner and Steve Wynn to Moscow fuels speculation about an unusual relationship between Trump and Vladimir Putin, with questions about political leverage and mutual interests. Trump’s decision to fly on an insecure plane is criticized as contradictory to his stated security priorities, suggesting a focus on image and status. Maria Bartoromo’s departure from Fox News is framed as a result of internal tensions over election fraud coverage, possibly indicating a broader shift in media politics.
Major construction projects like the Trump White House ballroom and the triumphal arch face legal challenges, underscoring ongoing resistance to Trump’s expansionist vision. Financially, the administration is portrayed as prioritizing personal wealth, with billions raised from donors and crypto. The Pentagon’s internal crisis, including 50 officials undergoing lie detector tests, reflects widespread institutional dysfunction and a crisis of trust.
These elements collectively paint a picture of a presidency driven by personal ambition, symbolic power, and a pattern of defiance—both in public discourse and behind the scenes—fueling questions about governance, integrity, and long-term consequences.
FAQs
Voters abroad can request a ballot by visiting votefromabraud.org and clicking 'Request My Ballot' to receive it by email. All states are now sending ballots to overseas voters.
Donald Trump uses a 'patch kit' consisting of small tufts of hair that match his current hair color. He applies these patches himself, and it's a long-standing, significant part of his daily routine.
Trump has consistently denied using a wig, claiming his hair is natural. However, experts and observers note that he uses a patch kit, which consists of small, applied hair patches that match his hair color.
Trump has insisted on using the Air Force One plane, even though it's not fully secure, likely due to a desire for perceived prestige and symbolism, rather than security concerns.
The new ballroom is being renamed the 'Donald J. Trump Ballroom' and symbolizes a permanent, visible mark of Trump's legacy, reflecting his belief in his own taste and influence over architecture and public spaces.
Jared Kushner and Steve Wyckoff have recently traveled to Moscow, where they are reportedly involved in discussions about peace between Russia and Ukraine, highlighting a noted and complex relationship between Trump and Russian leadership.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.