In this podcast clip, science journalist Max Lugavere discusses three food categories to reduce or eliminate for better health and longevity. First, he emphasizes avoiding ultra-processed foods, which make up 60% of American calories and are linked to a 14% increased mortality risk and 25% higher dementia risk per 10% consumption increase. These foods are hyper-palatable, low in protein, fiber, and water, making them easy to overconsume. Second, he recommends minimizing refined grain and seed oils (e.g., canola, soybean) due to their ultra-processed nature, suggesting extra virgin olive oil as a healthier alternative with proven benefits. Third, he highlights added sugar, which averages 77 grams daily, contributing empty calories, hunger, and blood pressure spikes. Lugavere explains that food quality dictates quantity: whole foods with protein, fiber, and water promote satiety, while ultra-processed foods lead to energy surpluses. He advises against perfectionism, encouraging small, manageable dietary changes to reduce disease risk and improve overall well-being. The episode underscores that these adjustments can enhance energy, cellular defense, and long-term resilience.
Today's bite-size episode is sponsored by Heights. We took a lot these days about longevity and sometimes I think that word can feel quite clinical. When I think about what that word means to me, it's not actually about living to a hundred. It's about being the kind of 60-year-old, 70-year-old, 80-year-old who's still fully engaged with life. A few months back, I started taking thrive, a new daily longevity supplement from the British band Heights. It combines four clinically studied ingredients at research-backed doses which together support energy production, cellular defense, and long-term resilience, all in one simple daily capsule. This is a safe, effective formula developed by doctors and dieticians with two EFSA approved health claims. Heights is giving my listeners an exclusive 20% off your first order of thrive. Just go to Heights.com/livemore and use the code LiveMore to get started. Welcome to Feel Better Live More Bite-size-yall, weekly dose of positivity and optimism to get you ready for the weekend. Today's clip is from episode 330 of the podcast with science journalist and New York Times' best-selling author, Max Lucavé. Max is passionate about helping people improve their brain health, their longevity, and how they feel by optimising their diet. And in this clip, he shares three types of foods that he believes are worth reducing or removing from our diets and explains why doing so could have many benefits for our health. I think many of us are aware now that the foods we're consuming are hugely increasing our risk of getting sick in the future. In your view, with all the research you've done, what do you think of some of those common foods or types of foods that we should think about cutting out or at least reducing to reduce the chance that we're going to get sick? That is a great starting place. At this point, what I've come to realise is that one of the biggest food issues related to disease and our predisposition for any number of non-communicable, so-called diseases of civilisation, including Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia, is the preponderance of ultra-processed foods in the food environment. So this is a category of foods. And these are foods that you couldn't make in your own kitchen. These are foods that typically line our supermarket aisles. They're the foods now that make up 60% of the calories that Americans are consuming worldwide. And these foods pull the trigger in many ways on our predisposition to non-communicable chronic diseases. Every 10% increase in ultra-processed food consumption has been associated with a 14% increased risk in early mortality and a 25% increased risk in the development of dementia. These are the foods that are typically shelf stable. They have long ingredients lists. They don't rot. They're not the kinds of foods that have immediate shelf lives. And they typically have a number of different characteristics that make them in particular dangerous. There's nothing about them that is inherently toxic, but it's the confluence of variables that make them a driver of this epidemic that we're talking about. One of those factors is that they tend to be hyper-palatable when you consume these types of ultra-processed packaged processed foods that are hyper-palatable. It pushes your brain to a bliss point beyond which self-control is nearly impossible. I mean, some people can do it, right? But I think a very common experience that most people have, for example, with ice cream is that they open up the pint of ice cream intending to have one spoonful. And before they know it, they're looking at the bottom of the pint. And oftentimes we feel a sense of moral failure when we're not able to moderate our consumption of these foods. But these foods are not designed to be consumptive moderation. So it's not actually a moral failure. It's something that these foods are quite explicitly designed to do. Yeah. One of the key points there for me was the fact that these foods are hyper-palatable. And I think everyone will know that feeling. They've tried to embark on a new easing plan. They've tried to exercise self-restraint, yet if those foods are in their house, many people really, really struggle to stop. How do you tackle that, though, for people, because they are everywhere. And there are foods that are absolutely contributing to how sick many of us are getting. Yet many of us just don't know what to do about that. Yeah. There was actually a project done by a photojournalist. I'm not sure the name, but people can go to Google Images and look for a week's worth of food, like a typical week long shopping haul from both an American family, a family in the US, as well as in the UK, in the UK, it's a Caucasian family in the US. It's an African-American family, but you can see the week's worth of groceries typically consumed in both countries. And you have to use a magnifying glass to find the fresh, perishable food. It's primarily ultra-processed food or these mixed dishes which combine fat, sugar, and salt, the so-called Dorito effect that make foods not just difficult to consume moderately, but incredibly calorie dense. So as I mentioned, it's not that these foods are innately toxic or innately fattening, but they are obesogenic, meaning they do drive obesity and metabolic dysfunction because we tend to over-consume them. When eating to the point of satiety, we tend to over-consume these foods. And this was proven in a very elegant study funded by the NIH, actually, led by a well-known obesity researcher named Kevin Hall, who found that when people were in the hospital, people were given access to ultra-processed foods and told to eat to satiety as a human does, right? Like we like to eat to a point of satiety, of fullness. That when allowed only to consume ultra-processed foods, people ended up eating a 500 calorie energy surplus, right? So an energy surplus is the way that's why we store fat, essentially, right? It's like the law of thermodynamics. So these foods, by the time we've eaten to satiety, we've already over-consume them. But in this crossover trial, what they were also able to show was that when you give the same people access to minimally processed foods, these are kinds of foods that you are potentially able to cook in your own kitchen, depending on food access and availability, all important factors, that they ended up eating to the same degree of satiety, but they came in at a 300 calorie energy deficit. So that's an 800 calorie swing. That is a significant amount of calories determined purely by the quality of the food that these people were eating. So oftentimes, somebody who's overweight, they get told by their doctors to just eat less move more, right, to moderate the quantity of the food that they're consuming. But here's the kicker, the quality of the food that a person is consuming dictates or at least influences the quantity. Yeah, that's such a key point, isn't it, for people max, whether it's to lose weight, reduce their risk of disease in the future, to help them lower their blood sugar, you know, whatever their health goal might be, you know, a lot of people these days, they want to find a way to eat less. They don't want to be consuming as much as they're often consuming, but a lot of people still don't realize it actually, the quantity often is downstream from the quality, get the quality bang on, then often, not always, I know it is possible to over consume good quality food. I don't think it's going to hurt myself, but it's just a lot less likely, isn't it? It's a lot less likely. And that's, we attribute that characteristic to the food matrix. So there are three factors. We're getting a little bit off topic, but I think this is important to the three foods, the types of foods that people should generally avoid. But I think it's really important for people to understand the qualities of the whole food matrix. So the qualities of whole foods contrasted to these ultra-processed foods that make a food satiating. And so the problem with these ultra-processed foods is, aside from the fact that they tend to be hyper-palatable, they are very calorie dense typically and they are minimally satiating. So the three factors that make a food satiating are one, it's protein content. Protein is the most satiating macronutrient. So when we talk about macronutrients, what we're referring to is our protein carbohydrates and fats. But much more so than carbohydrates and fats, protein is the most satiating, meaning it's the most likely to fill you up. And to turn off those signals and cues related to hunger. And so the problem with ultra-processed foods is that they tend to be diluted of their protein content. This is for, I think, many reasons. One is that protein just tends to be expensive. So when you remove the protein from a junk food, you increase the margins. So this is something that's very attractive to food manufacturers. This is why ultra-process junk, the foods that your grandma would look at and say, that is junk food. These foods tend to be some combination of carbs and fat. They tend not to be high protein foods. is the most satiating of the
macronutrients. So if you're hungry, you want to look for foods that are high protein, which tend to be whole foods. The other factor that makes food say, "Shitting" is its fiber content. So when food gets processed and processed and processed and removed from this food matrix, what you lose among other things is the fiber. And fiber, we don't have a biological requirement for dietary fiber, but it does seem to improve life. It does seem to be associated with lower levels of inflammation and increased longevity. And it does support the gut microbiome, which you've talked about many times on your podcast. But the reason why fiber is satiating is because it mechanically stretches out the stomach. So it turns off the release of a hunger hormone called ghrelin. And it does so by absorbing water in the gut. And then the third factor that makes a food satiating is its water content. Now why are ultra processed foods deprived of water? Because water impedes on a food's shelf stability, right? And so you remove water from an ultra processed food that just further depletes its satiety index. Its satiety value. And water is satiating because we can go a few days, weeks, maybe months for some of us without food, but only a few days without water. So water is of utmost importance to the physiologic functioning of the human body. But when water seems to be available for one of our hunter gather ancestors, where would the next best place be, right, to find water? It would be in food. Yeah. So a lot of times our hunger cues are just the cross wires of us just requiring a little bit more hydration. Yeah. Brilliant. Matt. Sipa Sipa. Esfool. Say one food group that we want to think about avoiding are these ultra processed foods. Any other foods or food groups that you would encourage us to look at and go, you know, just be careful there. Yeah. Definitely. So this is a bit more controversial, but I think it is probably worthwhile to minimize your consumption of grain and seed oils. These unsaturated grain and seed oils. And specifically what I'm talking about are industrially produced, refined, bleached and deodorized grain and seed oils like canola oil, corn oil, soybean oil, grape seed oil. And I think it's very much worth in accordance with the research, swapping these oils for extra virgin olive oil, which has a ton of evidence on being cardio protective, being neuro protective, being supportive of metabolic health. And so I make that recommendation for a number of reasons. One, the preponderance of evidence really does support that extra virgin olive oil has myriad health benefits. Yeah. Right. It's anti inflammatory. It's got a very cardio, cardio protective fatty acid profile. So it's rich and heart healthy, mono unsaturated fat. It's chemically stable, which is not that you can't say the same thing about these refined bleached and deodorized grain and seed oil. So you can actually cook with it. You can use it as a sauce. And we have whether it's animal research, observational level data, like looking at people who adhere to a Mediterranean dietary pattern or the mind diet, which is protective of brain health, extra virgin olive oil is the only oil that's recommended in the mind diet and in the Mediterranean dietary pattern. This is I think crucially important and tends to be overlooked. They're not recommending that people ingest more canola oil in these dietary patterns that are associated with reduced risk for dementia for Alzheimer's disease and other chronic conditions. Yeah. I mean, even when you describe those oils, you use three terms refined bleached and deodorized. If we just take a step back for a minute, those are three terms that I don't think many of us want to associate with the food that we're putting inside our bodies. Exactly. You know, it's that stark when you describe it. Where does sunflower oil, for example, fit into this paradigm here? Yeah, great question. So there are different types of sunflower oil. You can actually find on the market a variant of sunflower oil because sunflower oil typically is one of these kinds of oils that I'm suggesting that people minimize their consumption of. But you can often find, especially now, a variant of sunflower seed oil called high oleic sunflower oil, which I think is actually okay to use. It's still not as good as extra virgin olive oil, but it is primarily oleic acid, which is a very abundant type of fatty acid found in nature. It's chemically very stable. And so it actually has a fatty acid profile that looks quite similar to avocado oil. And so I think that that's fine. But yeah, it was so great, Rungan, that you teased this out because we know that ultra-processed foods, as I've mentioned, is associated with all the bad things that you don't want, right? That we should, there's no health expert out there, no nutrition expert that would say we need to consume more ultra-processed foods, right? Everybody's saying we need to consume less. So why do these refined, bleached, and deodorized grain and seed oils get a pass? They are the very definition of ultra-processed. You couldn't make them in your own kitchen. If you tried, they didn't exist in the human food supply prior to 100 years ago. That's a really key point for me when we're looking at these modern foods, or certainly these modern food-like substances. If there is any doubts with evidence, if there's conflicts, if there's debate on both sides, I think a reasonable thing to look at is how long has this been in the human food supply for? It's not the only thing, but I think it's a pretty reasonable thing to look at and go, well, it didn't exist 100 years ago, 150 years ago. I think that note of caution is pretty reasonable, because it is really, really divisive at the moment, this whole vegetable oil thing. Some people are saying there is no evidence at all for people to be reducing this in their diet. Other people are saying we should never be touching these things at all. I think you're making a very strong case that I think for most of us, we should absolutely be limiting them. I think the moderate message is that the dose makes the poison. If we're talking about the oils that you're bringing into your house, I suggest not doing that, but it's not going to kill you, necessarily, to have a little bit in your house here and there. Most people, when they cut these oils out, in fact, they end up cutting out ultra-processed foods in general. They inevitably see the health benefit to doing that. I appreciate what you said there about the dose making the poison. Because frankly, it's very hard for people to avoid those oils 100% at the time. That's they're going to just stay at home, cook all their meals with extra virgin olive oil. It's going to probably be impossible to avoid those things all the time. Any other foods that we should think about reducing and cutting out our diets? I think it's always important to underscore the insidious nature of added sugar today in Western diets. I would say that added sugar is something that people need to become as well and more mindful of and to do their best to minimize. Today, your average adult consumes about 77 grams of added sugar, sugar for which we have no biological requirement. That's about 19 teaspoons. When you consume that amount of sugar, first of all, sugar, again, does make the poison as with most things. It's not inherently fattening, but it does contribute empty calories to the diet. It contributes to the hyper-palatable characteristic of most ultra-processed foods, the added sugar component. It tends to be hidden whether it's in commercial bread products or sauces. Added sugar seems to be everywhere. We know that glycemic variability is associated with increased feelings of hunger. Eating a high sugar snack or meal could actually perpetuate feelings of hunger as opposed to satiate, to reduce feelings of hunger, which is ironic and counterproductive. We know that high sugar boluses, meaning in one single meal, consuming a very high amount of sugar, has been associated with a drop in testosterone by about 25%. We can see that high sugar boluses increase systolic blood pressure, and this seems to persist for hours after an ingestion. We know that high blood pressure is a risk factor for not just stroke and cardiovascular disease, but also for dementia. One of the big problems, I think, in contributing to this in the city of nature of it is that sugar tends to go by many different names in the food supply. You can see on the labels here in the UK that there is added sugar, it sneaks in everywhere. Whatever you buy, if you're not careful, you will be having more sugar than it's good for you. There's no question about that. It's a big problem. I think it has to do with the fact that sugar is cheap. Again, it contributes to hyper-pollotability, which makes repeat customers for the food industry. We love sugar. We've evolved to like sugar. When sugar is in the body, it causes the hormone insulin to become elevated, which tells our body to store fat. It not only tells our body to store fat, but it keeps our fat siloed away, so that we burn sugar instead of our hard-won fat stores, which back prior to the ubiquity of food stability, when food scarcity was a real problem for most people. Being a better fat store was actually an advantageous physiologic phenomena. Sugar is the primary food ingredient that tells our bodies that
that essentially it's summer. Fruit is ripe, gorge yourself on fruit, and store fat. And so that today has become hijacked by the modern food supply. And it's not to say that sugar is the primary driver of obesity, it's not. It really comes back to ultra-process foods, hyper-palatable mixed dishes and the preponderance of these oils and the like. But sugar when consumed, especially in the quantity that it is consumed today, it contributes. So we have covered these three big categories of foods that if we can reduce them at least in some way from our diets, we're probably going to experience benefits straight away and reduce our risk of getting sick in the future. If you were to share just a few final practical tips my audience to help them start living better lives immediately, what would some of your top sets be? Well, I think we can't let perfect be the enemy of the good. I think there is this tendency to want to live perfectly and to adhere to some, oftentimes somebody else's ideal of what perfection looks like. And I think this can be perpetuated by, you know, whether it's social media or Netflix documentaries or the like, I think we have to be really kind and gentle with ourselves. We live in crazy times and many of us have lots of obligations on a day-to-day basis that we have to tend to, whether it's our social lives or romantic lives or professional lives. And these are all important, right? But for me, sometimes, you know, even being able to pull myself to the gym for a 20-minute workout, right? Is better than not having gone at all, right? So I think we have to not be perfectionist about this and be able to recognize that, you know, sometimes it's the little gifts that we give ourselves over the course of the day. That ultimately will add up to make a big impact, right? And it doesn't have to be these extended hour and a half long workouts, for example, or a complete revamp of one's diet, right? Incrimentally, if you, for example, reduce your intake of ultra-processed foods, even just a little bit, or reducing your intake just a little bit of the, you know, the granucidols or the added sugar that we were talking about or maybe using a little more extra virgin olive oil or you'll see a benefit. And in my world, dementia, this is a condition that takes decades to manifest. And you have decades of agency to change the course of your cognitive path. And I think what's so crucial about that is that, you know, you have choices that you make every single day, right? Like we eat three times a day if not more and why not make a decision that is hedging your bets to some degree, but also makes sense through the lens of evolution, right? These are conditions that, for the most part, were rare in antiquity, right, throughout human history. And now they're increasing in their incidents, right? So I think a very small proportion of people have deterministic genes, but this makes up only two to three percent of Alzheimer's cases. So I want the people that are listening to this to know that you have a degree of control in terms of your cognitive destiny and food plays a major role here. Genes are not destiny, right? Your genes may load the gun, but it's your diet and lifestyle, ultimately that pull the trigger on this condition for many. Hope you enjoyed that bite-sized clip. Hope you have a wonderful weekend. And I'll be back next week with my long-form conversational Wednesday and the latest episode of Bite-Simes next Friday. Now, before you go, I just wanted to let you know about something I'm really excited about. On July the 1st, I am kicking off my first ever 21-day energy reset. It's a simple challenge built around the four pillars of how you feel each day, how you relax, eat, move, and sleep. And if you're someone who's tired, a feeling tired, then this challenge is for you. Over 21 days, you'll build simple daily habits that will help you wake up with more energy, feel calmer and clearer, and start to feel like yourself again. Small actions, which will lead to a big change in how you feel and the best part. You won't be doing it on your own. You'll be doing it alongside other people. And I'll be there with you on the live kickoff call. It's 29.99 to join, and you can sign up now at dottochatagy.com/resets.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Ultra-processed foods (e.g., shelf-stable items with long ingredient lists) are linked to increased risks of early mortality (14% per 10% increase) and dementia (25% per 10% increase), as they are hyper-palatable, calorie-dense, and minimally satiating.
Refined grain and seed oils (e.g., canola, corn, soybean oil) are ultra-processed and should be minimized; swapping them for extra virgin olive oil may offer cardio-protective and neuro-protective benefits.
Added sugar, often hidden in sauces and breads, contributes empty calories, increases hunger, and raises blood pressure; average adult consumption is about 19 teaspoons daily, with no biological requirement.
Food quality influences quantity
Practical tip
Summary:
In this podcast clip, science journalist Max Lugavere discusses three food categories to reduce or eliminate for better health and longevity. First, he emphasizes avoiding ultra-processed foods, which make up 60% of American calories and are linked to a 14% increased mortality risk and 25% higher dementia risk per 10% consumption increase. These foods are hyper-palatable, low in protein, fiber, and water, making them easy to overconsume.
, canola, soybean) due to their ultra-processed nature, suggesting extra virgin olive oil as a healthier alternative with proven benefits. Third, he highlights added sugar, which averages 77 grams daily, contributing empty calories, hunger, and blood pressure spikes. Lugavere explains that food quality dictates quantity: whole foods with protein, fiber, and water promote satiety, while ultra-processed foods lead to energy surpluses.
He advises against perfectionism, encouraging small, manageable dietary changes to reduce disease risk and improve overall well-being. The episode underscores that these adjustments can enhance energy, cellular defense, and long-term resilience.
FAQs
Ultra-processed foods are shelf-stable items with long ingredient lists that you couldn't make in your own kitchen, like many packaged snacks. They are linked to a 14% increased risk of early mortality and a 25% increased risk of dementia per 10% increase in consumption, due to being hyper-palatable, calorie-dense, and minimally satiating.
These foods are low in protein, fiber, and water, which are key for satiety. An NIH study showed people eating ultra-processed foods consumed a 500-calorie surplus versus a 300-calorie deficit with minimally processed foods, an 800-calorie swing driven by food quality.
These oils are industrially processed, refined, bleached, and deodorized, and didn't exist in the human diet 100 years ago. Swapping them for extra virgin olive oil is recommended, as it's cardio-protective, neuro-protective, and chemically stable.
Added sugar provides empty calories, contributes to hyper-palatability, and can increase hunger, blood pressure, and reduce testosterone. The average adult consumes 77 grams daily (19 teaspoons), with no biological requirement for it.
Focus on food quality over quantity by choosing minimally processed, whole foods. Don't let perfect be the enemy of good; small reductions in ultra-processed foods, grain oils, and added sugar can improve health without requiring perfection.
Food quality influences quantity; eating high-quality, minimally processed foods leads to natural calorie deficits, while ultra-processed foods drive overconsumption. This shifts the focus from 'eat less, move more' to improving food choices.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.