Transkriptio kertoo 9-vuotiaan Marie Chiverellan kylmästä murhatapauksesta, joka tapahtui 18. maaliskuuta 1964 Hazletonissa, Pennsylvania. Tyttö katosi matkalla kouluun ja hänen ruumiinsa löydettiin myöhemmin raiskattuna ja kuristettuna paikallisesta hiilikaivoksesta. Rikos järkytti syvästi perhettä ja koko yhteisöä, ja siitä tuli pitkäaikainen ratkaisematon mysteeri.
Alkuperäistutkinta keskittyi useisiin epäiltyihin, mukaan lukien mies, joka teki väärän tunnustuksen, ja toinen mies, joka teki itsemurhan ennen kuulustelua. Todisteet ehtyivät, ja tapaus jäätyi yli puoleksi vuosisadaksi. Murha vaivasi perhettä vuosikymmeniä, ja heidän uskonsa pysyi lujana.
Tapauksen käänne tapahtui vuonna 2007, kun uhrin vaatteista löydettiin DNA-näyte, joka tuotti epäillyn profiilin. Vaikka se ei tuottanut osumaa kansalliseen tietokantaan, uusi teknologia mahdollisti sukututkimusgeneettisen analyysin vuosikymmeniä myöhemmin. Tämä johti lopulta epäillyn tunnistamiseen, tarjoten perheelle ja yhteisölle viimein vastauksia ja sulkeutumisen mahdollisuuden yli 55 vuoden jälkeen. Tarina korostaa perheen sitkeyttä, teknologian roolia kylmissä rikostapauksissa ja rikoksen aiheuttamaa pitkääkestoista kipua.
Moloftripla ylpeäna esittää, tripla deis, uusia etuja ja mahtavia tarjoksia joka päivä torstaisesta sunnuntaihin. Meille on helpotulla aina aamuvarheisesta iltamyöhään. Katsokkaikitarjokset, Moloftripla, istefi. - ja se on suhteen. - This was indeed one of the more unimaginable things - - that happened to this community back then. - What's happening to my family's life? Why have we been inflected with such a horrible injury? People crying, people jumping up and down, trying to deal with the harror? Could it be someone that my parents knew, someone that Marie's knew? Could the perpetrator have been someone within our own family? - It was a question, the community was asking for over half a century. - There are over 100,000 cold cases in America. Only about 1% are ever solved. This is one of those rare stories. Amanda Christman is a reporter with the Hazelton Standard Speaker. - Hazelton is roughly two hours away from New York City. Philadelphia is in Northeastern Pennsylvania. Our roots stem from the coal mining industry. Folks here have always been blue collar, hardworking, tough people. But that said, Hazelton has some of the biggest hearts. I always wanted to be a storyteller. And as I got older, I found out that I could tell other people stories through the newspaper while shining the light on truth. It was quite often that folks in the newsroom would talk about the Marie Chiverilla case. The big question was always who did it? Was the question the community was asking for over half a century? - It's March 18, 1964 in Hazelton, Pennsylvania. It's a cold late winter's morning when nine-year-old Marie Chiverilla grabs her gloves and leaves for school. Carmen Marie Radke is Marie's sister. On the morning of March 18, he was the normal morning we all got up, got ready for school. The feast day of St. Joseph was March 19. So on March 18, Marie was bringing canned goods in celebration of the sister's feast day. Ronald Chiverilla is Marie's brother. - I was the first born Ronald Chiverilla, followed by Carmen Marie. Middle brother was Barry. The fourth individual born would Marie's and the youngest David. Marie's who typically walked to school with Carmen Marie and Barry, on that particular day, she left a few minutes early because she needed to get those canned goods into her classroom. Her yet get over the Catholic mass by eight o'clock or she would be late. The route to school was about five to six blocks. Marie's, however, would never make it to St. Joseph's Academy. - We usually would come home for lunchtime. Barry and I came home and Marie didn't. Our first we thought maybe she'd just stayed at school because there was something at school she wanted for lunch that the cafeteria was having. - My father said, "No, she didn't have any plans to do that. Go back to school and find her." So that's what they did. - Devin Brutowski is a lieutenant with the Pennsylvania State Police. - Carmen notified her teacher who in turn notified the priest who was the head of the Catholic School. Mark Barron is a corporal with the Pennsylvania State Police. - They speak to the instructor that would be her home room teacher. That instructor says, "I haven't seen Marie either." And I have her marked absent through the morning classes. That's when they realized something went terribly wrong. - At that time, the priest made his way to the Chiverella House and they informed the family at which time they started calling the police departments and notifying them that Marie said not shown up for school that day. - My father realized that something went awry with the situation. - And that's when my father started looking. One of the neighborhood women yelled over to my dad and asked who and what he was looking for. And she said, "If you're looking for the little girl, they found her." - About three miles away from the Chiverella's home, a man makes a grim discovery. - Arthur Robinson and his nephew were driving in what would normally be called the stripping area, which is a coal mine area out in Hazel Township. - And while he is there, he notices something approximately 25 feet down a slope from the top of the garbage dump area. - He sees what he thinks is a doll. And as he got closer, he realized that it was a little girl. - He immediately left a refuse pit and called the state police. - This blindsided people, this was not expected. - When the troopers found the dead girl, they did make some phone calls. Back in 1964, churches were big in the Hazel Township, especially the Catholic church. The priests who were attached to the school that Marie's went to, they made their way out to the scene to administer last rights, which was common back in the day. - And one of those priests actually knows the victim and positively identifies her as Marie-Sans Chiverella. - News of the gruesome discovery reaches the family. - I remember the priests coming to the home. Family members were coming to the house. - My father's family had a lot of connections, a lot of brothers and sisters and uncles and aunts and so forth. There was nowhere to sit. People jumping up and down because their adrenaline was pumping, trying to deal with the horror that they were digesting. People crying. So I went downstairs with my dad and tried to emotionally cope with what had happened to Marie's and what was happening to my family. My father owned a grocery store. My mother, she was a seamstress, sewing machine operator. I was the first born, followed by Carmen Marie, Barry, Marie's and David. - Marie's was a quiet, loving little girl. - When Marie's was in first grade, she had a speech impediment that became more noticeable. My mother got the services of a speech therapist, helped work with Marie's over several months. And she turned into an entirely different young little girl. She would clown around a lot, her teasing and kidding was great. - Marie's and all of us would go to daily mass at church. Marie's loved the music of the organ. Would always ask our parents about getting one. So that Christmas of '62, my parents' prize maries with the organ. She was ecstatic. - She wanted to be like Sister Josephine. She wanted to be a cat like none. She was down in embankment. Her hands were bound, her feet were bound. She appeared to have ligature marks around her neck. Her stockings were pulled down just below thigh level, along with her underwear were pulled down along her legs also. She had a scarf stuffed into her mouth, which they called a babushka at the time. However, her clothing, which consisted of a blue jacket, wasn't dirty. It appeared that she had been placed there at the bottom of the pit. - And it was a very cold day. It was like 26 degrees. The original investigators were looking for any type of tangible physical evidence that they could have. They found a piece of insulation that had a footprint in it that was near the body. They collected that in the hopes that, "Hey, that could be something tangible. We can maybe compare that to a shoe of a potential suspect." They realized that there was a tire track down in the refuse pit, and they actually casted that, which they'll pour casting in, and then raised the tire track out, and we kept that. At the time in 1964, DNA evidence didn't exist. So what they were looking for would be any type of blood evidence that may have been left by the perpetrator on the victim. They also gathered all of the clothing that Maurice was wearing. So the coroner did an autopsy, and they determined that Maurice was sexually assaulted. She was strangled and beaten. They also made a determination of a bruise on her abdomen, as if somebody had struck her very hard, and it caused some damage to her intestines on the inside. So they listed the cause of death as homicide. - She was the chivalrella's child, but she could have been anybody's child. It was a very dark time for the city. The day after this crime was reported, a lot of the kids were not allowed to go out in the yard by themselves anymore. Everybody was scared that their child would be next. Anybody that's going to sexually assault a small girl, and then strangle her and leave her in a stripping pit in the cold and the snow is just a monster. - There was never a crime as heinous before in people's memory, as the one that happened to Maurice chivalrella. - The day after Maurice was murdered, the family went to Catholic Mass because there was a day of obligation at the church, and then we went back home. And I remember we were nurturing each other, crying, embracing each other, because that was the only dynamic we felt was helping each other. - Police questioned Maurice's family, determined to find out all they can about the little girl. They interviewed the father, they interviewed the mother of Maurice, they interviewed the brothers and sisters. - Depends on your state police, I had asked if they could speak with my father in private, and he said fine, so I accompanied my father. And it was at that point that the state police started getting into more detail. - In any investigation, you wanted to go ahead and create a timeline. You want to establish a timeline to try to nail down when the crime occurred, when was the last time that you saw Maurice alive? After interviewing them, they realized the timeline from Maurice leaving the residence was shortly after 8 a.m. - So the police were going ahead and contacting all the neighbors and people that lived within, I believe it was about a five city block area to try to establish what route she took to school that day. - They spoke with Helen Slattery, who was a cousin to the Shiver Ella family, and that's when they were able to pinpoint more or less the 815 timeframe of when she was last seen, heading eastbound on Fort Street. - Everyone in Hazelton seems to have a theory about the murder. - In the absence of any answer, there were a number of rumors going around town as to who could have done something like that. Some people believed it had been someone local because of the intimate knowledge of our geography and finding that call stripping pit, which would be only known to somebody locally. - I remember people wondering, was it one of our neighbors? - That's what the scariest part was, not knowing who and what they might do next. - Radkaisu on Metropolia. - She was in the first place in the town, and she was in the first place in the town. - The date of the funeral was a long, sad day. It was hard to see her parents grieving like that. - The biggest question is, why, why would somebody do this terrible thing to Marys? - Investigators look for similar cases in nearby jurisdictions. One case immediately stands out. - There was a cold case that had occurred in October of 1962, Karolan Dockardy. She was a nine-year-old girl who was found beaten and sexually assaulted and strangled to death in a upstairs balcony, St. Mark's Church in Bristol. - The Bristol High School basketball team played a basketball game the night of the 17th of March 1964. - There was that possibility that maybe somebody who had been at that basketball game could have been responsible for the Karolan Dockardy homicide, and now struck again in Hazelton. All of the students from Bristol who were absent the following day and who would have been of age to have committed such a crime, they were questioned. They're whereabouts were confirmed. The fans that had attended the game, who drove separately from the buses that were taking fans to and from Bristol, they were contacted. They were checked. They were cleared. - The Dockardy case is unsolved, and police can't link it to the murder in Hazelton. Police then look at the people closest to Maurice. - Her father had owned a little grocery store called the Little Market. Somewhere in the customer group could have been the person of interest. - They asked him if he had any trouble with anybody at their grocery store on Alter Street, and Mr. Schiberell has stated that there was a person that owed him some money, and that he hadn't seen him in a while, and they had an issue where he had to remove him from the store at one point. - Six days after Maurice has laid to rest, police speak to the man mentioned by Maurice's father. - Bruce Hilda Brand, in a lot of problems with alcohol, supposedly he had passed some bad checks to the father, and investigators wanted him to submit to a polygraph. And on March 30th of 1964, Mr. Hilda Brand called up the state police barracks and said, "I don't want to give a polygraph. I want to make a confession and tell you what I did." - Bruce Hilda Brand was a person characterized as having a bad temper. He liked to drink. He lived close by to where the Schiberellas had resided. - 29-year-old Hilda Brand has already told police he has something to say about the nine-year-olds murder. - The police send a car over to his house. He voluntarily gets into the car, voluntarily says, "Take me to the barracks." And it's there that he gives a confession of sorts to the police. - He was reciting what he did and what happened during the crime. - The report states that he's crying, he's sobbing, he's very remorseful. - He talks about having stolen his sister's car and coming across Murray says she's walking to school and him offering her a ride and her accepting the ride. - He provides a detail that says she was going to mass that day. However, he didn't take her to school, didn't take her to mass. He takes her to this abandoned dump. - It's clear to investigators, however, that Hilda Brand has been drinking and that's not the only problem. - He said that he strangled her to death, utilizing her scarf. But it turned out that she had been strangled utilizing her own shoelaces. Typically, you don't release all the information to the newspaper so that people have the intricate details of the case. Therefore, the only thing he was providing was the general information that was released to the public. - Hilda Brand ultimately recants his confession. - And he chalked it up to being in a state of depression at the time and that he figured what better way to be done away with than to admitting to this crime and that would be the end of him. - The original investigators in this case did a fantastic job of trying to leave no stone unturned. They were tracking down known sex offenders in the area. - In the middle of their investigation, one person stands out. - Harold Nicholas was one of those gentlemen who could have had immoral traits in the past. - The troopers at the time were given the information that Harold Nichols lived near the Shiverella residence and had a sexual deviant past and that he may have frequented the areas of the stripping where Maurice was found. They interviewed him about some of his indiscretions in the past. They interviewed him about if he had any contact with the Shiverella family. - He provided a story that had some inconsistencies. - And police had asked Mr. Nichols to come voluntarily down to the state police headquarters in Hazelton and submit to a polygraph examination. Mr. Nichols said that he would and I believe he was supposed to appear on May 12th 1964 at about 9 a.m. However, come 9 a.m. on May 12th, he doesn't show up. - And we got a report of a vehicle with a dead male in it near the stripping area where Maurice was found. - Upon arrival to the scene troopers identified the person as Harold Nichols and it appeared that he had committed suicide. - The cause of death was determined to be carbon monoxide poisoning. - The belief was that Harold Nichols could have been the killer because why would he commit suicide prior to coming in for the polygraph? And a lot of troopers believed that it was because he didn't want to have to confess to the crime. - Upon the death of Harold Nichols, the state police collected several hair samples from his person and they were entered into evidence for further potential use down the road. - By the end of 1964, leads in the case have dried up and the case of the girl who left for school and never came home goes cold. - I know that there was frustration in me. I know there was frustration in my parents siblings. We wanted to be solved. My mother and father were both very faithful to their religion. We prayed that we would find whoever did this. - I never gave up on Maurice's case. - They didn't know if whoever killed Maurice was still around and waiting to strike again. So four years, that was in the back of their heads, parents became more protective of their children. So their worlds changed quite a bit. That's how this story became intergenerational. - The Chivarella family suffers another tragedy when Maurice's father dies in 2006. - When my father passed, it started me thinking of Maurice's case and the questions that I've had. - Why am I spending time on the person that murdered Maurice? He's already robbed so much of my conscious life. - Then, 43 years after the murder, the investigation was reignited with a major breakthrough. - With the advancement of technology in 2007, our department went ahead and yet again sent out Maurice Chivarella's clothing. And it was finally in 2007 that they were able to locate Semino fluid on her blouse that she was wearing. From that stain, they were able to obtain a DNA profile for a potential suspect. - We knew about Maurice. We knew all these little details that made her who she was. Decades had passed and in Hazleton, the community doesn't give up. We don't forget. We protect our kids. - Investigators finally armed with DNA evidence entered the sample into a national database. - In 2007, the suspect profile was checked against KOTAS and there was no match. Since there was no match in KOTAS, either the individual had been deceased for quite some time or they were never mandated to submit to a DNA sample as required by law. - Once again, the investigation grinds to a halt. In 2014, Ronald and Carmen lose their mother, Mary. - My mother shared something with us that astounded us by way of, "I don't understand this. I don't know why it happened. I've lost Maurice. I only had her for nine years, but you know, I'm so happy and so blessed to have had her for nine years." - That mindset of a blessing and looking at the positive aspects of Maurice's life versus all the horror that occurred. - Three years later, there's a new investigator and new hope. - I was assigned the case in the fall of 2017 upon the retirement of the then lead investigator, Corporal McAndral. - And when you see the massive size that this case file is, there's over 6,000 pages. Corporal McAndral had been working potentially on acquiring this new technology where we could take a DNA sample, send it to a company, and they would be able to provide us with a snapshot if you would of an individual's ethnicity. - The DNA wasn't sent out until May of 2018, and the report that we received back wasn't received until October of 2018. - Just after the 55th anniversary of Maurice's murder, police released the phenotype sketches to the media. - We had it posted as a 25-year-old, a 40-year-old, and a 60-year-old. - The potential suspect was of Caucasian heritage, had either brown or black hair with a high probability had greener hazel eyes. - Therefore, we can present that to the public and maybe jog anybody's memory of what this person looked like and what they may look like now as compared to at the time of the murder. - There were several tips that were received, I would say probably an upwards of around 30 that our department received. - Corporal Baron ran down every tip that we received, however none of those tips panned out and we were unable to identify any new suspect from that profile. - And the disappointment was there, but we continue to move forward. - That forward movement comes in an email to Lieutenant Brutowski from an unlikely source. - Eric Fubert is a forensic genetic genealogist. - It was February of 2020 and I was reading up on cold cases in Pennsylvania and being that Hazelton is only about 80 miles from where I go to school, it was one of the first cases that came up online when I was looking. - After reading of the Maryshiverelek article, I just could not get this article off my mind. - So I immediately said, "Okay, what if I just send them an email saying, "Hey, I've read that you were trying this. I'm not trying to step on anyone's toes, but here's who I am, here's what I've been doing." - If you think there's a chance I can help out with your case, I would love to do it. - I was selling myself as a volunteer who wanted to help. - We met with Eric Schubert down at his college campus at a coffee shop and he came prepared like it was a job interview. - He had a resume, he had printouts of all of his accolades detailing the successes that he had had through his very short career after the meeting. - The Lieutenant-Protoski made some phone calls and the police departments that he reached out to said, "Eric Schubert's the real deal." - Our sample, our DNA profile, had been uploaded by this company to a publicly available genealogical database. - And we provided that information to Mr. Schubert who then started trying to put together family trees. - When I first got the DNA results, what really struck me was the top match was very distant. - And with that information, we were a bit worried that we would never get a relationship to the Hazelton area. - Eric Schubert though is just getting started. - I basically made a very calculated genealogical decision to focus on one side of the family that I thought could be promising as opposed to the other. - And I was just digging into that family, digging into records. - And as I did that, what happened was I actually ran into this large family that had Italian lineage. - Eric contacted me and said, "Hey, I've found a pretty close relationship to the Hazelton area with this name of Paul Meadow." - To know that we're potentially getting close, it feels real good. - I really enjoy finding the answer to a mystery, finding all those little pieces of evidence where in the end you sort of have that aha moment where all your work comes together into an answer. - When Mr. Schubert provided us with the Paul Meadow name, we knew that they were from the Weatherly area, which was just outside of Hazelton. We became very excited in thinking this could be our break in the case. - Discovering the name Paul Meadow is just the first step for Baron and Schubert. - Once we started narrowing in on this very large Italian family that had Hazelton connections, what we really had to do was just make sure that we had everyone document genealogically. - I went ahead and I did some research on the Paul Meadow family and I located a family member who had informed me that he had a detailed family tree for the Paul Meadow family and it's off branches and he was willing to provide that to me. - And that allowed us to say, "Okay, we have this family, we have all these people. Now it's time to get some DNA samples and see if we're on the right track." - The more DNA we have, the better off we're going to be and we could fine tune our direction that we have to take this investigation. Baron asks officers to help him speed up DNA collection. James Kiro's is a trooper with the Pennsylvania State Police. - I just remember Corporal Baron coming up to my desk and asking me if I'd be willing to assist him with the Chevrolet investigation. Corporal Baron and I were going out collecting DNA samples to include or exclude people. - When we would get the results from those DNA samples, we would send them to the Wiz kid and he would tell us which way we needed to go after that. - There were times where I would say, "Okay, we have 30 people and for us to move forward, here's what we need to do." - So that would be an occasion where we might pause for two weeks and regroup and think about what the best plan is and then come back to it and say, "Okay, we're going to ask for this sample." - I think we worked very well together. I think we all knew each other's limitations at times, but at the end of the day, it was a good combination of good old-fashioned police work of us going knocking on doors, building reports with people and having them being willing to offer cooperation. - After more than a year of collecting data and narrowing their search, in the summer of 2021, investigators get a break. - Eric was very confident that we were moving down the right path to solving this case. - We got a break in the case in the form of some publicly uploaded DNA samples in these few families that we had narrated down to. And we narrated down to sets of brothers. - Four potential individuals who were all related. Three individuals were deceased. One individual was still alive. - Talking with the district attorney that was assisting us with the investigation, we had to get a DNA sample from the one remaining brother that was alive. Had we not gotten a DNA sample from that brother, it was believed that we did not have enough probable cause to exume the body of the other brothers that were deceased. - So, in essence, all our chips were in the middle of the table when we went after the last DNA sample. - Trooper Kuros and I went down and met with the living individual. Spoke with him, he was willing to provide a DNA sample. We obtained that DNA sample and sent that sample off to our DNA lab for processing. The results of that DNA test did not match the suspect profile that had been established in 2007. - So, at this time, Trooper Barron and I and Schubert were ecstatic. We had it narrowed down to two people. One brother had died several years ago. The other brother had died back in 1980. The brother that had died in 1980, had no known children, had no widow, nothing of that sort. - One of the brothers emerges as a suspect. - Trooper Barron and I did criminal history checks on both brothers, found that one of the brothers had an extensive criminal history to include a sexual assault that occurred in 1974. That was similar to the sexual assault in homicide, which had occurred in 1964. - The team that we had assembled around us, we would have our conversations. And I think in our heart of hearts, we knew that there was one individual that was going to be our suspect. - That man's name is James Paul Fort. - We were 99% sure that James Fort was going to be our suspect in this homicide. When we got to the point where we had the two brothers left, we had the chivalras come into the office, and we spoke to them about where we were, and they were elated. - The problem for investigators now is that both men on the list, Frank and James Fort, are deceased. We get down to the two Fort brothers, one of whom was cremated, the other was buried. - Trooper Barron and I focused on the brother that was cremated and went to that individual's widowed wife and requested any material she may have had that was left over from his demise. She provided us two hairbrushes and a razor that we were able to extract DNA from, sent that to the lab and his DNA sample excluded him as a suspect for the known sample matched. - So after about a year and a half of work and after all those results, we came down to the one brother, one person, James Paul Fort. - To those who knew James Fort on a personal level, the way that they explained him was that he was a very nice person, and that they would never have thought him to be capable of committing this type of crime. He was an army veteran that served during the Cold War. He was a bartender. - Police discovered that James Fort, who died of a heart attack more than 40 years earlier, had a dark side. - The more we researched in the James Fort, we actually discovered a report from the 1970s, where he was involved in a sexual assault of a woman. - There are a lot of similarities to the sexual assault in 1974 to the homicide that occurred in 1964. Both victims had been abducted on Altar Street, taken out to the Stripens. They had been struck about their head and face area. - Still one hurdle remains for investigators. - Okay, we have enough evidence here to show that it is probably him. However, he's been dead since 1980, and he does not have children. So how can we get his DNA? - We met with the District Attorney's Office. We obtained a search warrant to exume Mr. Fort's body in order to extract DNA from his body and prove, once it for all, that he was the person responsible for Maurice's death. At the Examation, we removed the tomb, brought it into a garage area, and the cemetery workers were having a hard time with the steel case that enthumed the actual coffin itself. At one point, they were able to break open the metal tomb. They only broke it open about two inches, and we heard a loud metal clank. Everybody was looking around to see what had happened, and we looked down, and there was about a six to eight inch by four inch crucifix that somehow made itself out of the two inch slit in the metal casing that surrounded the coffin. And we all looked at each other and thought to ourselves, that's a sign that we have this guy, and this is going to be him. On February 3, 2022, nearly 58 years after Maurice Chiverella's murder, investigators get the answer they've been searching for. We received the results from our DNA lab, and James Paul Fort matched the DNA profile from the Seamonstane on Maurice Chiverella's jacket. We're always told not to get attached to a case, but you can't help it. And it's a vivid memory for everybody who lived through this, and it's a vivid memory for everybody who grew up in this area. I was numb because I knew all this was going on. I knew why we were there, and didn't want to look at this person's face. There was a sense of, I think, pride in that room. I'll never stop praising the Pennsylvania State Police for the work they've done on Maurice's case for the last 50-hate years. Amazing. I don't hate the individual. He personally did what he did, and it's up to a higher power than me to decide where it goes from there. I feel sorry for his family, for what they're enduring right now. I wouldn't wish that on anyone. I want people to know how wonderful my parents were, showing us that hate was not the way to go. Hate to them would have just destroyed us, and we just had love for each other, and that helped us get through all those years.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
9-vuotias Marie Chiverella murhattiin ja raiskattiin 1
maaliskuuta 1964 Hazletonissa, Pennsylvaniassa, matkalla kouluun.
Tapaus jäi kylmäksi rikoksiksi yli 50 vuodeksi, vaikka poliisi tutki useita epäiltyjä, mukaan lukien väärän tunnustuksen ja itsemurhan tehneen miehen.
DNA-näyte uhrin vaatteista vuodelta 2007 ja myöhemmin sukututkimusgeneettinen analyysi johtivat lopulta epäillyn tunnistamiseen vuosikymmeniä myöhemmin.
Rikos järkytti pysyvästi sekä perhettä että paikallisyhteisöä, ja sen ratkaisu vaati perheenjäsenen sitkeää ja teknologian kehitystä.
Summary:
Transkriptio kertoo 9-vuotiaan Marie Chiverellan kylmästä murhatapauksesta, joka tapahtui 18. maaliskuuta 1964 Hazletonissa, Pennsylvania. Tyttö katosi matkalla kouluun ja hänen ruumiinsa löydettiin myöhemmin raiskattuna ja kuristettuna paikallisesta hiilikaivoksesta. Rikos järkytti syvästi perhettä ja koko yhteisöä, ja siitä tuli pitkäaikainen ratkaisematon mysteeri.
Alkuperäistutkinta keskittyi useisiin epäiltyihin, mukaan lukien mies, joka teki väärän tunnustuksen, ja toinen mies, joka teki itsemurhan ennen kuulustelua. Todisteet ehtyivät, ja tapaus jäätyi yli puoleksi vuosisadaksi. Murha vaivasi perhettä vuosikymmeniä, ja heidän uskonsa pysyi lujana.
Tapauksen käänne tapahtui vuonna 2007, kun uhrin vaatteista löydettiin DNA-näyte, joka tuotti epäillyn profiilin. Vaikka se ei tuottanut osumaa kansalliseen tietokantaan, uusi teknologia mahdollisti sukututkimusgeneettisen analyysin vuosikymmeniä myöhemmin. Tämä johti lopulta epäillyn tunnistamiseen, tarjoten perheelle ja yhteisölle viimein vastauksia ja sulkeutumisen mahdollisuuden yli 55 vuoden jälkeen. Tarina korostaa perheen sitkeyttä, teknologian roolia kylmissä rikostapauksissa ja rikoksen aiheuttamaa pitkääkestoista kipua.
FAQs
Marie Chiverella oli yhdeksänvuotias tyttö, joka katosi koulumatkalla Hazeltonissa, Pennsylvaniassa 18. maaliskuuta 1964. Hänet löydettiin myöhemmin kuolleena, ja hän oli kärsinyt seksuaalisesta hyväksikäytöstä, kuristuksesta ja pahoinpitelystä.
Alkuperäiset tutkijat keräsivät fyysisiä todisteita, kuten jalanjäljen eristeestä ja renkaanjäljen kaatopaikalta. He säilöivät myös uhrin vaatteet, mutta DNA-tutkimukset eivät olleet käytettävissä vuonna 1964.
Vuonna 2007 teknologian kehitys mahdollisti siemennesteen löytymisen Marien pusakasta, josta saatiin DNA-profiili epäillylle. Tätä käytettiin myöhemmin sukututkimuksessa ja fenotyyppien luomisessa etsintäkuulutetta varten.
Tutkijat keskittyivät muun muassa Bruce Hilda Brandiin, joka teki väärän tunnustuksen, sekä Harold Nicholsiin, joka teki itsemurhan ennen polygrafitestiä. Kumpaakaan ei kuitenkaan pystytty lopullisesti yhdistämään rikokseen.
Rikos järkytti Hazeltonin yhteisöä syvästi. Lapset eivät saaneet enää leikkiä yksin, ja vanhemmat olivat huolissaan lastensa turvallisuudesta. Tapaus jätti pitkäaikaisen pelon ja murheen kaupungin asukkaisiin.
DNA-pohjainen fenotyyppiprofiili kuvasi epäillyn olevan kaukasialainen, ruskea- tai mustatukkainen ja todennäköisesti vihreäsilmäinen. Kolme ikähaarukkaa (25, 40 ja 60 vuotta) julkaistiin mediassa muistin virikkeenä yleisölle.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.