Dave Smith reflects on his role in the political shift away from Donald Trump, noting he was among the first major figures to publicly call for Trump’s impeachment. He argues that critics of Trump, such as Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin, falsely claim that dissenting voices are enabling a return to Democratic dominance, while in reality, the Democratic party has long been associated with radical policies and institutional overreach. Smith emphasizes that the anti-woke movement achieved significant cultural victories, culminating in Trump’s 2024 election win and a realignment of power. He critiques political rhetoric surrounding Israel, especially claims of apartheid or war crimes, arguing they are often used as rhetorical tricks rather than grounded in evidence. Smith points out that figures like Victor Davis Hanson rely on misleading framing and irrelevant comparisons to deflect criticism. His central stance is rooted in truth-telling and political integrity, rejecting manipulation or partisan spin. As the U.S. approaches the midterms, Smith warns that the Democratic party’s return to power poses a serious institutional threat, and he calls for a clear, evidence-based evaluation of how the Republican administration protected American institutions during a time of political upheaval. The episode also promotes a parasite cleanse by the Wellness Company and highlights Quince’s clothing brand as a personal recommendation.
what's up what's up people welcome to a brand new episode of part of the problem i am dave smith
thank you very much for uh for joining for taking the time to listen to me uh just me this episode
rolling solo thank you to everybody who came out this weekend in dallas man what a great time
uh always love doing those hyenas clubs there in fort worth in dallas uh if you're if you're in that
area man those are a couple of great comedy clubs that they got there thank you so much to everybody
who came out great great shows uh this weekend and then well i'm off this this weekend i get a
nice one with the family uh but then we'll be back out on the road we got um what is the next stop oh
the next up is salt lake city and las vegas uh so i will be headed out there salt lake city and las
vegas i'm bringing
you
robbie the fire bernstein with me of course comic dave smith.com uh for all of those ticket
links and of course rob's going all around the country on his own as well uh porch tour.com for
all his stuff and of course check out rob's other show run your mouth fantastic hilarious show um
okay so a few things that are on my mind uh for today's show uh the first one i alluded to
on the uh the members only show that we did over the weekend by the way if you're interested in
that you can go to our website at partoftheproblem.com and if you guys are unaware we do
four shows uh a week it's not just three there's a fourth show but you have to subscribe over at
partoftheproblem.com uh to get the fourth show and then you also get the show every day when it
streams ad free uncensored the entire archive of the show and of course you get to to support us
if you love what we're doing as a please do if you can't subscribe over at partoftheproblem.com
and thank you to all of those of you who have um but so i find this is the kind of
point of view that i'm going to be using for this show and i'm going to be using it for the rest of
that i wanted to make i alluded to this on the members only episode but i'd wanted to get
uh into it more fully here but this really is remarkable to me and this has to do with i guess
what has been a major theme of this show over the last year uh i guess the last year plus you know
the summer's over here uh we're we're like into the fall i guess i don't know when is technically
the summer over but it's right around now um and
you
so the summer of 26 is over it was at the beginning of the summer of 2025 that i i guess
officially uh jumped with both feet off of the trump train and publicly called for his impeachment
um i think i'm not sure about this i've never actually bothered to look this up but i do think
of the people who supported trump um i i you know i mean i don't know i guess it's kind of arbitrary
how you'd measure it but i think it's kind of arbitrary how you'd measure it but i think it's
kind of arbitrary how you'd measure this but of the big name people who supported donald
this but of the big name people who supported donald trump i think i was the first one
trump i think i was the first one
trump i think i was the first one to jump off and certainly
to jump off and certainly
to jump off and certainly one of the first if not the first and
one of the first if not the first and
one of the first if not the first and ones who jumped off like the most
ones who jumped off like the most
ones who jumped off like the most ferociously i called for his you know
ferociously i called for his you know
ferociously i called for his you know impeachment and
impeachment and
impeachment and i think a trial maybe who remembers but i
i think a trial maybe who remembers but i
i think a trial maybe who remembers but i was right anyway um
was right anyway um
was right anyway um yeah i mean i joined the latest and i
yeah i mean i joined the latest and i
yeah i mean i joined the latest and i left the earliest or something like that
left the earliest or something like that
left the earliest or something like that of the trump uh coalition but
of the trump uh coalition but
of the trump uh coalition but i you know i remember at that time to
i you know i remember at that time to
i you know i remember at that time to me when he launched the 12-day war and
me when he launched the 12-day war and
me when he launched the 12-day war and he covered up the epstein uh files it
he covered up the epstein uh files it
he covered up the epstein uh files it was like it was obvious the decision the
was like it was obvious the decision the
was like it was obvious the decision the administration had made and i think
administration had made and i think
administration had made and i think over the last year year and a few months
over the last year year and a few months
over the last year year and a few months that's kind of been borne out now you
that's kind of been borne out now you
that's kind of been borne out now you know that's from my perspective
know that's from my perspective
know that's from my perspective one of the major arguments along the
one of the major arguments along the
one of the major arguments along the way as we've talked about on the show
way as we've talked about on the show
way as we've talked about on the show has been let's say as
has been let's say as
has been let's say as over that period of time
over that period of time
over that period of time you know if you remember this was like
you know if you remember this was like
you know if you remember this was like i was like kind of the first one at
i was like kind of the first one at
i was like kind of the first one at least in my circle of of people who
least in my circle of of people who
least in my circle of of people who jumped off but over that period of time
jumped off but over that period of time
jumped off but over that period of time now obviously tucker and megan kelly and
now obviously tucker and megan kelly and
now obviously tucker and megan kelly and alex jones and candace owens and you
alex jones and candace owens and you
alex jones and candace owens and you know uh
know uh
know uh i mean i wouldn't say i don't know
i mean i wouldn't say i don't know exactly what the status with rogan is
exactly what the status with rogan is
exactly what the status with rogan is but he's certainly been very critical of
but he's certainly been very critical of
but he's certainly been very critical of a lot of the policies
a lot of the policies
a lot of the policies um and theo vaughn and guys and andrew
um and theo vaughn and guys and andrew
um and theo vaughn and guys and andrew schultz and all these guys have been
schultz and all these guys have been
schultz and all these guys have been very critical of the administration and
very critical of the administration and
very critical of the administration and um
um
um during that time the guys who still
during that time the guys who still
during that time the guys who still supported donald trump
supported donald trump
supported donald trump essentially
i would say their biggest argument
i would say their biggest argument
i would say their biggest argument although there's been a few but probably
although there's been a few but probably
although there's been a few but probably their biggest argument has been
their biggest argument has been
their biggest argument has been that hey guys you're essentially
that hey guys you're essentially
that hey guys you're essentially giving in to the radical left like look
giving in to the radical left like look
giving in to the radical left like look the democrats and the leftists who
the democrats and the leftists who
the democrats and the leftists who who did so much damage over the last you
who did so much damage over the last you
who did so much damage over the last you know however many years
know however many years
know however many years you're gonna let them right back into
you're gonna let them right back into
you're gonna let them right back into power um and and in some ways
power um and and in some ways
power um and and in some ways you know half of the uh half of the
you know half of the uh half of the
you know half of the uh half of the attacks from these guys
attacks from these guys
attacks from these guys on people like us is that
on people like us is that
on people like us is that we sound like the leftists or we're
we sound like the leftists or we're
we sound like the leftists or we're siding with the leftists like
siding with the leftists like
siding with the leftists like oh my god dave you know i get this all
oh my god dave you know i get this all
oh my god dave you know i get this all the time like you keep talking about
the time like you keep talking about
the time like you keep talking about palestine or the genocide over there
palestine or the genocide over there
palestine or the genocide over there whatever it's like what are you one of
whatever it's like what are you one of
whatever it's like what are you one of these leftists now you're at now you're
these leftists now you're at now you're
these leftists now you're at now you're out doing shows with anna kasparian
out doing shows with anna kasparian
out doing shows with anna kasparian after all this time we fought against
after all this time we fought against
after all this time we fought against the the kind of like um
the the kind of like um
the the kind of like um woke insanity or whatever
woke insanity or whatever
woke insanity or whatever and
and
and you know look i'll say this
you know look i'll say this
you know look i'll say this at at least to some degree when you hear
at at least to some degree when you hear
at at least to some degree when you hear people like ben shapiro or whoever make
people like ben shapiro or whoever make
people like ben shapiro or whoever make these arguments there is at least some
these arguments there is at least some
these arguments there is at least some degree of like overlap in agreement
degree of like overlap in agreement
degree of like overlap in agreement between us and them and so maybe it's
between us and them and so maybe it's
between us and them and so maybe it's fair to just for the sake of this point
fair to just for the sake of this point
fair to just for the sake of this point that i'm getting to
that i'm getting to
that i'm getting to maybe it's fair to just point that out
maybe it's fair to just point that out
maybe it's fair to just point that out but we certainly would agree right that
but we certainly would agree right that
but we certainly would agree right that yeah the democrats were awful we don't
yeah the democrats were awful we don't
yeah the democrats were awful we don't want to hand power back to the
want to hand power back to the
want to hand power back to the democratic establishment that
democratic establishment that
democratic establishment that essentially was governing during joe
essentially was governing during joe
essentially was governing during joe biden's presidency which also was
biden's presidency which also was
biden's presidency which also was governing during the obama presidency
governing during the obama presidency
governing during the obama presidency and you know particularly i guess for me
and you know particularly i guess for me
and you know particularly i guess for me as someone who i think
as someone who i think
as someone who i think when it comes to like street cred on
when it comes to like street cred on
when it comes to like street cred on the issue of criticizing woke insanity
the issue of criticizing woke insanity
the issue of criticizing woke insanity or criticizing the democratic
or criticizing the democratic
or criticizing the democratic establishment
establishment
establishment i really take a back seat to no one um
i really take a back seat to no one um
i really take a back seat to no one um in fact i think i was probably
in fact i think i was probably
in fact i think i was probably light years ahead of almost all i mean
light years ahead of almost all i mean
light years ahead of almost all i mean you know you have to go through them but
you know you have to go through them but
you know you have to go through them but almost all the warhawks who criticize us
almost all the warhawks who criticize us
now you know they'll take my position on russiagate now but how many of them had it at the time
and how many of them who were against it were even like soft against it like well there should
be an investigation we should get to the bottom of any russian collusion because like they didn't
see through it as like the deep state coup that it was um so now you know now they're trump loyalists
but back then and again during covet of course that none of their track record was good maybe
maybe one of them but most of them was terrible anyway you know there is something about that
accusation that um hey you're whatever you're doing here you're about to let the radical left
back in and i do i remember in fact there was one i think i want to say it was a meet the press
interview with pat buchanan but who knows because pat was on tv so much back in those days um but
there was one where they were asking him about if you
if for those of you who don't know pat buchanan like he was a um you know he worked for several
presidential administrations and he mounted a very serious um primary uh presidential campaign
in 1992 but in the year 2000 he ran on the reform party and it all just kind of fell apart he didn't
get a lot of votes but the famous thing he's known for in that election is that he got a
bunch of votes in the like these jewish counties in florida and the overwhelming suspicion is like
i think it was i can't remember the details i think it was like if you looked at the way
the voting cards were the people clearly thought they were voting for al gore and accidentally
voted for pat buchanan and this was the margin of error it would have given him the state of
florida and therefore the presidency because it came down to florida that year so anyway but so
they um i think they were asking at one point him about getting al gore elected like what if
you running against the running as a third party took votes away that would have gone to george
bush and now you got al gore elected and he was like oh my god that is terrifying that
would be on my tombstone there he lies he got al gore elected and so anyway in a way it's like
this criticism isn't anything new it's what the anti-war right-wingers always get you know just
go along with the team because we're a little bit better than them so hold your nose through
this next war but you know those of us that many of us uh don't agree to do that
with this one uh for a lot of reasons and pat buchanan was right to not agree to do it back then
um anyway
so this kind of attack that hey man you know while you're sitting here turning your back
on donald trump what this is going to lead to the democrats coming back i think that it's
you know it look i'm not going to say it's a good line of attack but it probably is the
best line of attack that they have and you could understand why they'd make it you know it's like
well look if we have nothing else other than we have consensus that the whole pretending biden
isn't senile and transing the kids and supporting the war in ukraine and forcing people to get the
covid vaccination we have consensus that that's all bad so let's go back to that and and you got
to understand where from like my perspective probably the perspective of a lot of people
who listen to this show it's it's pretty goddamn infuriating because if you think about any of those
issues that i just laid out i guarantee i was good on them before all these people were and now they
they are gonna invoke our country,
of consensus against those things and of course our response to this all along has been no dummy
like you guys are handing power back over to them that's why you don't go launch a war that nobody
wants to fight and lose it on top of that um because this is what's going to give power back
to that crazy establishment well as we sit here right now we are in the last week of uh september
or the last full week of september meaning we're basically into october it's we're a month away
from the midterm elections and i just can't overstate how crazy i think this is okay so
however you've been um however you feel about that entire fight
that's gone down over the last year you know the say ben shapiro's and
levin's and whoever else on the warhawks on one side and then you know tucker carlson and
and guys like me or whatever over on the other side and they've essentially been saying oh
look you guys well first off they they oscillate back and forth between saying you guys don't
matter tucker carlson doesn't matter no one cares this doesn't affect real people to now saying as
i predicted they would earlier in the year to now saying you guys are destroying the coalition you
have no reason why we're gonna lose the midterms and look you're handing power back over to the
democrats and then their biggest like uh indictment seems to be that some of you rascals have even
said you're gonna support the democrats or you hope that the democrats win you know i think nick
fuentes said he's gonna support the democrats i believe correct me if i'm getting that wrong i
think he said that and i certainly said that they they they have to win the midterms you know because
you know, lies you into war has to be punished. And so that's their big, you know, out like,
oh, well, look, you guys are either indirectly or directly giving aid and comfort to the Democrats
and they're going to destroy this country. They are such a big threat. Right. And it's so like,
hey, we're all in agreement that, yes, they are a big threat. And we could go down the list of
the things that the Democratic establishment and like left leaning Americans people have done over
the last 15, 20 years and how insane it all is. Maybe another episode we could do that. But just
listen, sign up at part of the problem dot com and listen to this podcast. The last 15 years we've
been covering it, I think. All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's
show, which is the Wellness Company. Americans love sushi. Over the last two decades, raw fish
consumption has exploded.
Sushi bars are everywhere. Millions of people now eat raw fish weekly. But there is a hidden risk
that most people never think about. And that's parasites. This is why many physicians are raising
awareness about parasite exposure. Dr. Peter McCullough, you may remember being heroic
throughout COVID. He recommends doing a parasite cleanse at least once a year as a preventative
measure. So the Wellness Company offers a hard to access prescription parasite cleanse. It's USA
compounded ivermectin and mabendazole. Ivermectin
paralyzed.
The parasite's nervous system while the mabendazole starves them. Each capsule contains 25 milligrams
of ivermectin and 250 milligrams of mabendazole. You can choose between a 90 or 45 capsule bottle
giving you either four or two 21 day parasite cleanse cycles. So go check them out at TWC dot
health slash problem and use the promo code problem to save up to $60 off. Plus you get free
shipping. That's TWC dot health slash problem.
Promo code problem for up to $60 off plus free shipping. All right, let's get back into the
show. But okay, so here's the big argument. You like let's really distill it down. I guess it's
that if we had kept our mouth shut, or perhaps, perhaps if I'm trying to be as charitable as
possible, they're going, guys like me, let's say could have voiced our criticism for policies that
we don't like in the Trump administration, while overall still supporting Donald Trump, right? So
there's probably a way that I could have let you guys know on this show that I didn't agree with
the decision to go to war in Iran. But then I could have like, I could have not focused on that
so much. I could have talked about that. And then really talked about some radical leftist policy,
some Democrats somewhere, I could have kept it more like, let me still try to help the Republican
side and get them over, right? Like, like, I'm just saying that we could have done that.
And then we'd be in a stronger position than we were to essentially break away and trash Donald
Trump and and renounce the regime. And and this part I will if I'm trying to be as charitable as
possible. This part, I'll give them some like, if I'm being completely fair, because I have noticed
this dynamic a bunch, right? Like Pierce has had me on a couple times where it's like me versus Trump
supporter.
And a Democrat check in there too. And it ends up just being me versus the Trump supporter. And
then she is just kind of a waste of time. I guess my point is that guys like me and guys like Tucker
and guys like Joe Kent. We make the argument a lot better than most liberals can.
And so in that sense, we are kind of like handing them ammo. We're handing them talking
points. We're handing them whether we mean to do it or not. We're handing them the best way to attack
Donald Trump. And so in some sense, these Ben Shapiro Mark Levin types can argue, hey, you guys
breaking in this way aids them over this administration, right? But then we could sit
here and the counter argument, obviously, that I would make is just, fuck this whole game. I don't
play that game. I tell the truth to my audience. That's the agreement I have with my audience. I
don't go.
I don't cycle this through the mind of a political operative because I'm not a political operative.
And that, to me, is almost like very inherent. It's very fundamental in the DNA of whatever the
hell this show is. Whatever the hell it is that is me talking and you listening right now. Very
fundamental in the thing there is that I'm like, hey, I'm a guy. I'm an American talking to other
Americans about what I see as the state of our country. But I'm not a political operative. I'm not
trying to be a political operative feeding you something in a way designed to manipulate you
into an opinion. And if I was doing that, that would feel like wrong. That would feel like a
betrayal of kind of the agreement here. So anyway, so essentially, so my counter to the Ben Shapiro
types is, number one, I don't do that. I'm not in the business of trying to get one political party
elected over the other. I'm in the business of telling the truth to people as I see it.
It's a different thing. And then, like, number two, it's like, no, if you're so worried about
that other group of people, then you don't launch a war of aggression on behalf of a foreign country
and lie your way into it. Sorry. That's the answer. You know, like, it's it's this is like
during COVID when what's his name? What's his name? The pretend intellectual who talks about
me all the time, but is too much of a coward to ever see me. I'm sorry. I know that's not specific
enough. Sam Harris. So in Sam Harris says during COVID, what was the I'm sorry, what was the
argument that I wanted to to compare here? So, oh, oh, so during COVID, Sam Harris was I apologize
for that during that during COVID, Sam Harris would make the argument. You know, the real
problem here is that people like Joe Rogan and Dave Smith are sowing distrust in institutions,
but we need institutions. And you're like, that's the argument. The argument
like that's the argument the argument is that when we point out that they lie people are less
likely to trust them like i don't know i mean like this is like uh this is like the guy who's
cheating all over his wife getting mad at the person who told his wife you told her and now
she doesn't trust our marriage like yeah okay fine but really the problem was what you were doing
i i don't know it's just too it's it's hard to take it seriously but anyway so that's
so so yeah our argument which is clearly the correct one is number one we don't believe in
lying and number two it's your fault that you've undermined this like the whole point you can't
just get up at your convention get up at all these different speeches and all these different
interviews and promise no new wars and then launch and then launches into the obvious war of choice
that was always on the table while you were saying no new wars you know you launched it
anyway
okay so that's but here's really the point this really is the kicker
for this argument that like i just kind of i think briefly and i think fairly and charitably
laid out their side of the argument and our side of the argument but for this argument to exist for
their argument or our argument or our counter argument to not be contradicted in order for it
to be valid the the agreement is that the democrats are really bad
they're
a big threat okay we we can agree on that like i said before we could go through the litany some
other time but we could agree on that um and and certainly i don't know i mean there's people out
there who say you know kind of wild things and by my disposition by my nature i'm a little bit
adverse to like making wild claims but people say if the democrats come back in they will
do X or Y. I don't know. I mean, I do think it's reasonable to think some things like they will
try to impeach Trump again. They will have investigations and subpoenas. They will tie
up the administration. I think that's reasonable. You know, but like they will institute a central
bank digital currency. They will do lockdowns again. They'll do forced vaccinations. They'll
do forced gender reassignment surgery. You know, I don't know. Who knows if they'll do any of that
stuff? However, given what they did over the last 20 years, it's not that crazy that people would
think they're going to ramp it up if they get in there again. Well, OK. All right. So cut to today.
Another thing I think we can all objectively agree on, not looking great for the Republicans
going into the midterms, which are, by the way, as I mentioned before, in a month. In a month.
You know, so much of the what really I think could be described as a countercultural movement
over the last 15 years, the anti-woke movement that ultimately was victorious,
at least to some degree, certainly has rolled it back from where it was.
You know, there's I mean, a lot of people played roles in that, you know, there was a huge mass
like kind of pushback against so much of that, that cultural insanity. What I think could be
studied if we return to normalcy could be studied by historians as a true moment of like,
you know, mass psychosis. But so much of that pushback that culminated in the success of
Donald Trump's victories in the 2024 election, you know, was so many of us fought and did our
little part to battle back against that woke insanity and all of the policies and cultural
norms that surrounded it. And in 2024, you know, Donald Trump comes in, he wins the presidency.
He's got the Supreme Court, a somewhat handpicked Supreme Court. He's got control of the House of
Representatives and the Senate. And the Democrats are in the toilet. They had like a 22 percent
approval rating as a party, humiliated with the catastrophe of Joe Biden having to pull out in
the fourth quarter and then Kamala Harris humiliating herself internationally. You know,
the Democrats were destroyed. This very dangerous thing that we all agreed was destroyed. And then
the Republicans come in and the Republicans have control of the Congress and the Supreme Court and
the White House. And this was our moment. And so as you sit here and you go, OK, we're a month away
from what we all agree is likely going to be however any of us feel at this point is likely
going to be Democrats taking back control of the Congress, certainly the House of Representatives,
and quite possibly, quite likely the Senate as well. Certainly the House. OK, so we're about
we now all know we're all in agreement here. I think
this party represents a huge threat. And this party is also about to come back into political
power. So as we sit a month out, we might ask ourselves, I think this is a fair way to grade
the Trump administration. If you're telling me the communists are at the door. This is not Joe
Biden or Barack Obama, as bad as that was for our nation, it may have ultimately destroyed this
great nation. Right. Well, it's certainly devastating for it. As bad as that was,
you're telling me something even worse is.
You're telling me something even worse is.
Well, with this opportunity that we had over this two year period, what have we done to
institutionally protect the American people, the American Republic, the American nation from what
these Democrats are about to bring? And I'll I'll wait for answers on that.
You know, we know that the leftists went through the long march of the institutions and took over
every damn near every single one of them. And I think that's what we're going to see. really add some bit of perspective to this whole argument that we've been
having over the last year. Oh yeah. We're the, we're the bad guys for, for telling the truth
about this nightmare. All right. Um, so I also did the other thing I wanted to do, uh, for today's
episode is I wanted to respond to this, uh, this video I've been getting, uh, more and more
particularly lately, uh, particularly over the last week. I guess maybe it's since maybe it's
because of the Alan Dershowitz debate or the way that that went, but now I'm getting a lot of
people sending me, uh, Victor, uh, Davis Hanson clips saying that, uh, I got to take on this guy.
This is the guy who really will smack down my shit. Um, which is kind of interesting. I've been
through several layers of, uh, I'm really trying to find the Tootsie roll in the end of this Tootsie
pop, but everybody,
I keep saying that this next guy is going to be the guy who smacks me down. You know,
I remember when people were telling me I was going to get loomered by Laura Loomer. Um,
and then after I debated Laura Loomer, I bet, remember that was the big knock. Like, oh yeah,
you'll do that to Laura Loomer. She doesn't know anything, but why don't you try that with Dennis
Prager, you know? And then, and then of course, Douglas Murray was supposed to be the big, bad
wolf. And even, even, uh, this is, we were saying with, um, Alan Dershowitz going into it, I was
like, well, I guess he is the most accredited accomplished arguer of,
of any of the Warhawks. So let's say that. And of course he had nothing too. Um, I will say,
you know, I like Victor Davis Hanson. I read, uh, two of his books, I think two of his books,
definitely one of his books. I think I read two of his books. Um, and I've watched a bunch of his
lectures and stuff. He's, you know, he's like the best of the neocon guys, um, in many ways. And
he, um, well, he, what was interesting of, of like all those, I don't know if he was ever like
technically a superhero. I don't know if he was ever like a superhero. I don't know if he was ever
a self-identified neoconservative, but he certainly supported George W. Bush's whole
war on terrorism. Um, and, but, you know, he's a really interesting, very smart, very well-read
guy. And to his credit, I will say he, unlike a lot of the other neocons, he dealt with and
grappled with the Trump moment, uh, way better than any of them. You know, like a lot of the
other neocons were like when Trump rose, you know, they just kind of shrieked racism and,
you know, a rejection of the global international order. And he was at least,
Victor Davis Hanson was at least kind of like, no, it's not racism. It's like an understandable
reaction against mass demographic change. And then he actually endorsed the idea that we should
really change the global world order. Um, I think not in the way that some of us more sane people
would like. Okay. That being said, he definitely also supported this war in Iran and it's a
really good thing. Um, you know, I think it's, it's a really good thing. Um, I think it's a really good thing. Um,
created anything i just podcast about it and then maybe it comes true so anyway let's take apart uh
these arguments because you know how it is we can't let any of these arguments stand
um here is victor this is yeah this is like a version someone took out of the video and put
a background you know how people do that anyway it's the argument that matters let's play we're
hearing a lot of charges since october 7th that israel has committed a litany of war crimes let's
examine them very carefully because i think they tell us more about the accuser than they do the
accused we're we're told by a lot of representatives in our own congress let's let's stop it right
there let's let's stop right there here and you can pull it back a few seconds because i do want
to get into what his argument is but i will say as is this is almost like a throwback now having
to take on these things you know it's like when people would be like uh before i got the dennis
prager debate people would be like here's a video dennis prager made and i'd take that on here's a
video ben shapiro made it
about you know the history of israel and they're all just so loaded with propaganda but sometimes
especially when there's a very skilled orator a very smart person like victor davis hansen you do
kind of have to like break this down let's look at this tactic because the first thing he does here
is he goes okay so in the west it's become popular this idea that israel's committed a litany of war
crimes okay that's the very specific accusation that israel's committed a litany of war crimes
and that accusation that israel's committed a litany of war crimes is the accusation that israel's
committed a litany of war crimes is the accusation that israel's committed a litany of war crimes
and that accusation that israel's committed a litany of war crimes is the accusation that israel's committed a litany of war crimes is more about the accuser
is more about the accuser
is more about the accuser than it does about the accusation
than it does about the accusation
than it does about the accusation wait so we've already moved in just to
wait so we've already moved in just to
wait so we've already moved in just to the very next sentence we've moved from
the very next sentence we've moved from
the very next sentence we've moved from let's examine the claim to see whether
let's examine the claim to see whether
let's examine the claim to see whether the claim is correct or not to in like a
the claim is correct or not to in like a
the claim is correct or not to in like a comment on the character of the person
comment on the character of the person
comment on the character of the person who brought it up i'm sorry dude like
who brought it up i'm sorry dude like
who brought it up i'm sorry dude like this is one of the reasons why
this is one of the reasons why
this is one of the reasons why zionists lose and lose and lose and
zionists lose and lose and lose and
zionists lose and lose and lose and lose this pr game is that it's just
lose this pr game is that it's just
lose this pr game is that it's just like after a while man people notice
like after a while man people notice
like after a while man people notice that
that
that people notice that it's like why is this
people notice that it's like why is this
people notice that it's like why is this one subject that you're not allowed
one subject that you're not allowed
to kick the tires on. It's like the only subject that I'm not allowed to kick the tires on and walk
around the car and kind of take a look and go, hey, well, what's up with this? Well, what's up
with that? It's like, you know, I'm sorry. If people are claiming they've committed a litany
of war crimes and you go, let's examine that closely, the next sentence that followed would
be like, the accusation is that IDF soldiers were using toddlers as target practice. Let's examine
the evidence for that. Okay, there's two in-depth Tourette's pieces where there's six different IDF
soldiers who testified to say, you know what I mean? Like, let's go through the evidence. Go
through the claim. There have also been claims that were wrong. Go through some claims that
were debunked. I mean, I, you know, anyway, here, let's keep playing.
By a lot of representatives in our own Congress, mostly on the Democratic side,
not all, Tucker Carlson, for example, Candace Solins, but also Zoran Mondami and others have
said that Israel is a country that is a country that is a country that is a country that is a
an apartheid state. In other words, it has racial enclaves, but there's nothing in the
Israeli constitution that requires you to be Jewish. In fact, there's 2 million Arabs living
freely, voting freely inside Israel. Like, okay, so again, if you may notice, this is a, and I don't
know what to say, man. It's just like, this is what they all rely on. And I know some people do
hold Victor Davis Hanson up with some esteem, but, and I will say, you know, one of the things
in debating Alan Dershowitz, in fact, it was, it was Daryl Cooper said to me, I talked to him on
the phone after I debated Alan Dershowitz. And he said, at one point he goes, I forget what he said,
but he said, it was like, you were arguing like with a computer who hasn't updated its software
since 1995. You know, and I said, I don't know what to say. And he said, I don't know what to
say. And I said, I don't know what to say. And I mentioned that on the other show the other day that it's
like, none of these arguments are new. And not even that none of them are new. I mean, none of them
have even been updated in 30 years. It's the same exact script. And the truth is that like all this
stuff has just been debunked. And they're like, almost just pretending that doesn't exist, that
this hasn't been spread yet, that people don't know. But anyway, it's just obviously that none
of this is working. But so so to Victor Davis Hanson here is going to say so if you notice
right away, let's just get into some of the details here immediately was the first claim.
Oh, there's been this claim that there's been a litany of war crimes committed by Israel. Let's
examine that closely. People on the left say things and now people on the right kind of sound like the
left. They claim it's an apartheid state. Let's get into that. Well, wait a minute. This is a
totally different claim. Like you just he made the first claim didn't debunk it at all after saying
it was an apartheid state. And now he's on to apartheid state. Look, feel however you feel about
war crimes. Feel however you feel about apartheid. Those are different things. Those are different
claims. They are not the same thing. There have been apartheid states like South Africa that
didn't commit war crimes. There have been states that committed war crimes like, I don't know,
Russia. That isn't an apartheid state. I don't know. The two things don't go hand in hand
necessarily. So he's moved the goalpost to a completely different claim. Now he attempts to
debunk the second claim and he don't debunks the second claim by claiming this is ridiculous
because there's millions of Arab citizens in Israel and they can vote freely in the elections.
It's like, yes, it at the Israel proper is about 80 percent Jewish, 20 percent Arab, and they have
free elections. And guess guess who wins to be the governing party every single time? OK, yes, that is
true.
Um, but that's not what anybody's talking about when they call Israel an apartheid state.
They're talking about the people who live in Gaza and the West Bank.
who israel's had control of since 1967. the complaint is about those people and saying
that they don't have voting rights even though they live under israeli rule whether or not israel
claims officially that they're part of their government or not they live under the rule of
that government and have for 60 years and they don't have fighting voting rights so pointing out
that the 20 of arabs in israel do have voting rights just has nothing to do with the claim
so he threw out one claim said let's examine that then just abandon it throughout a second claim
pretended to disbunk it with information that has nothing to do with the actual claim that my
friends is some sophistry that's that's why this doesn't work in debates it doesn't
work when there's pushback against it anyway let's keep playing two member arab nations almost all of
them require just bring it back a second there natalie so i can get the full thing thank you
that requires you to be jewish in fact there's two million arabs living freely voting freely inside
israel in contrast of the 22 member arab nations almost all of them require islam as the national
religion and of the 30 muslim countries arab and non-arab alike about 23 of them make it a crime to
be an apostate from islam does anybody ever say that these are apartheid states do you really
believe that if you were a trans community you could start a movement in iran could you have a
mormon chastity
after on the west bank could you build a new cathedral of christian worship in istanbul today
under erdogan you think there's a gay rights parade going on in gaza no no these are apartheid
they eliminate and marginalize communities let's look at another charge that we hear settler all
right let's pause it let's pause it right there okay then then just bring it back a couple seconds
and we'll take on the uh when he says let's look at another charge so look i mean it's it's again
i said this this argument it's like all of them it just it depends and and this is why i do these
debates this is why i think the debates are interesting and why i do think there's value
in them and i understand there's problems with debates and there's problems with debate culture
and yes there are people who are too much just trying to win and get an own and not have a good
faith exchange of ideas but man when they're good or when they actually demonstrate something
i think they really are important and
i think like with look with this issue with the the pro-israel guys they they just
always have to use these framing tricks that are just obviously tricks like dude
and i hate that term what about ism i hate when people use it but this is like if it ever applied
to anything this is it right there what you say israel's an apartheid state well let me just talk
about it's obviously the claim of apartheid state is a claim about the millions of palestinians that
live in gaza and live in the west bank under israeli occupation okay so first i'm going to
just pretend that the complaint is about arab citizens of israel and go what are you talking
about they all have voting rights and then go look over here at all these other states
they do bad things and you don't call that apartheid well all right i mean look when you say
that if you notice he starts slipping a lot of things in there are you when you he starts saying
well could i just go build um
a um a transgender cathedral in the middle of iran or saudi arabia or could i you know start
preaching against islam in the middle of syria or could you know like whatever other thing he has
and it's like uh well for the record no you could not do that and please don't try to do that and
that would be that would be a fantastic point if the claim that i had made or the debate topic
resolution was iran is a very free open-minded place right like if i had claimed that tehran
is a bastion of religious liberty or something like that then it would be a very good counter
to say well in fact it's not and you couldn't open any you know you couldn't open a church
in the middle of tehran like okay that's true but what the does that have to do with
the claim of israel being an apartheid state i mean isn't it so obvious or you just look at it
like this is just a distraction dude and the truth is that nobody i mean i don't know correct
me if i'm wrong there's always some loon online but nobody is making the argument that tehran is
a bastion of freedom or that the saudis practice you know um religious liberty or that whatever
there aren't all these problems all along the place and this is what's interesting is what
happens is israel has right as we know they have a special relationship with the
united states of america they get more aid than any other country in the world and then the
countries who are like in second and third place get the aid because of israel you know like egypt
gets the aid to be friendly with it with israel um they get more foreign aid they get more support
they get unconditional support from the us they call it the special relationship that even when
they defend it they acknowledge that it's a different relationship than we have with anybody
else even like the uk is not as close with israel who's not even an official ally it's all craziness
um and then in defense of that if that's ever examined they go hey we're the only democracy
in the middle east we're the most humanitarian country the most moral army in the world
we do more to prevent some civilian deaths we are a first world democracy in a sea of you know
autocratic uh uh theocracy or whatever and then if you respond to that and you go no you're not
you're an apartheid state you're not a democracy then they go well what about
iran you know but like this is all just ridiculous yes nobody's saying but again
if we were to let's say we were to elevate saudi arabia to the special relationship status of
israel and we went no no now we're going to give saudi more aid than anybody else now we're going
to support them unconditionally now we're going to fight wars on behalf of them fight wars with
them all of that stuff and then people started talking about the saudi human rights abuses
that's totally reasonable i mean it's reasonable to talk about it now but it would be more
reasonable to talk about it then and it wouldn't be an excuse to go but look at all these other
countries they do bad stuff too just has nothing to do with anything all right guys let's take a
moment and thank our sponsor for today's show which is quince you know those pieces in your
closet that you find yourself wearing on repeat the sweater that goes with everything the perfect
pair of pants or the tea somehow always reach for first those are the pieces that make getting
dressed easy and that's what quince does best i will i can give you guys a high personal
recommendation on this one i've ordered several things from
quince and i really like it they focus on high quality wardrobe staples made with premium
materials like 100 percent mongolian cashmere organic cotton or merino wool the styles are
timeless versatile and designed to become the dependable piece you reach for day after day
quince also makes premium pants fitted tees and polos and breathable active wear quality basics
designed to work across your wardrobe and hold up to everyday wear and everything at quince is priced
50 to 80 percent less than similar brands they work directly with ethical factories and cut out
the middlemen so you're paying for high quality not brand markup i really do love this clothing
brand they got nice stuff it all looks good it's it's kind of like um it's kind of casual and
understated which is what i like to go for and none of it breaks the bank like it's very reasonably
priced which is very difficult to find these days as you know also it's not just clothing
quince brings the same approach to everything they make from hotel quality bedding and bath to kitchen
essentials and thoughtfully designed furniture they make well-designed pieces for everyday
living so find your next fall favorite at quince by downloading the quince app for app exclusive
offers or you can go to quince.com/potp you'll get free shipping on your order and 365 day returns
now available in canada and the uk as well so go check them out q-u-i-n-c-e.com/potp that's quince.com/potp
shipping and 365 day returns all right let's get back into the show all right let's keep playing
no no these are apartheid they eliminate and marginalize communities let's look at another
charge that we hear settler colonialists this means that israel were interlopers
let me ask you something israel modern day israel we have archaeological and linguistic evidence
that jews were living there 3500
oh dude pause it jesus christ here pause it man this is just every bit as bad as like one
of these dennis prager videos what's his word interlopers meaning like invaders or whatever
um so he says the the charge now we've moved on to another charge by the way he didn't defend
the apartheid charge at all or the war crimes charge he just he just mentioned that they're
charges and then just danced around the fact that they're both obviously true like i don't know israel
control of like six or seven million people that have been denied voting rights for 60 years
it's an apartheid state um and yes do they commit war crimes almost every war crime in the book
yes um anyway so now we're on to the charge of settler colonialism
and and i mean it's just does everybody see do is my job even necessary anymore everyone
sees the dirty trick he just pulled right he goes oh there's settler colonials they're interlockers
so the accusation is they're settler colonial uh colonial sorry settler colonialism that they would
colonizers so that's the accusation but how could they be invaders how could modern israel be
invaders when we know archaeologists could tell you jews have been here all along okay well the
dirty trick there is that modern israel and jews are not interchangeable terms and of course this
is ridiculous like all right first of all the founders of israel were european they weren't
the jews who were there the entire time that's that would be sephardic jews not ashkenazi jews
who came over from europe and to say that they've been there the whole time that there's always been
a jewish presence in what is now israel well yeah that's true but what percentage of the population
oh yeah like five percent yes there was a tiny population of jews that were there the entire
time but nobody denies that in fact the pro-palestinian people bring that up all the time
because their point is that before
the state of israel everyone lived like relatively in peace like there were jews and and arabs and
christians or jews and arabs living side by side christians and muslims you know um and so anyway
yes it's true but like again if um i don't know like if there's if there's like let's say that
there's five percent of an area you live in is is thai is from thailand okay um and then
thailand invades and creates a state and takes over the whole country you wouldn't just be like
well i've been there they didn't take it over thailand thai people have been here the entire
time like well yeah a little percentage of them what does that have to do with that and the point
is that a bunch of europeans came over and created a state evicted a whole bunch of people it never
let them back in and they've ruled over those people this whole time what how are you actually
taking on the argument i don't even really love the term settler colonialism i don't know how useful
it is or or isn't but like yeah the point is that it wasn't europeans had come in uh many times
and dominated local populations and we called this um colonialism we called this um
empire empiricism right and so not empiricism excuse me empire um
uh and so you know like that okay so that's there's you have something like let's say the
french um uh colonization of algeria right so the french go and they take over algeria and they make
it part of the french empire and the the french government rules it and they collect taxes and
they run the government services and they bring in their way of life and all this shit right um
but then you had a situation like israel
where a bunch of europeans went and started a government there but this wasn't europeans who
had a country back home this wasn't like france coming in and and conquering algeria or britain
coming in and and you know ruling over whoever india or later syria or palestine or wherever
this was a bunch of stateless europeans who had their own story of their own persecution story
much of which is very true and whatever but like there were a bunch of stateless europeans who
came in and did the same thing like formed the government that you know ethnically cleansed a
bunch of people ruled over them but they didn't have a state back home right they were settling
and colonizing the play that's the accusation and what are you doing to take that on to say no
because there were some jews here the whole time that's not true how does that disprove anything
i think what would that like if i were to just go take over an area where there's been
some jews
that then okay nothing happened okay let's keep playing
people who spoke early hebrew who practiced the jewish faith and lived on the land that is now
israel okay suppose it so actually where so so the actual argument is that because there were
some people on who were on the land who practiced judaism and spoke hebrew therefore
it's okay for european jews to come create a state there like what
so like if italy just conquered manhattan they could be like there's been italian people here
the entire time dude there were people speaking italian by the way hebrew is not the language that
the zionists spoke they revived a dead language to start the project of of israel and they chose
the place because of this line of jews that had been there the whole time um but they
they spoke yiddish or russian or whatever um anyway so i mean this is just such a non-argument
like because there were some jews because jews there and again single digit percentage of the
population because there were eight percent of them were jews therefore european jews can come
take over the whole thing it's not settler colonialism anymore this is bullshit this
is dumber than the leftists who use the term objectively no matter how you feel let's keep
playing where did the arabs come from they swept in from
asia into the middle east and north africa and as settler colonialists conquered byzantine and
earlier roman territories that had been western i just pause it again man this was just i mean
again this is true and victor hans victor davis hansen is a very interesting like historian so
he could probably give you some great lecture about this and have all bits of tad bits of
information that i don't know um very smart guy but what does this have to do with the
anything man like it's it's they just oscillate back and forth from non-argument to non-argument
it's like you're conquering these people no we're not because there were always some of our people
within some of those people okay but you're still conquering those people well other people have
conquered people in the past yeah no kidding i know the you're right that is true did you know
that the arabs are from arabia well what the heck are they doing way over here off of arabia yeah
you're right that is true but we're still conquering these people we're still conquering these people
we're still conquering these people we're still conquering these people we're still conquering
these people but that doesn't just mean that we think it's okay to do that now
i mean jesus christ yes muslims once conquered and invaded people so did europeans so did asians
so did the native americans so did everybody right right it's still bad to do that now
okay i still don't want my tax dollars going back and forth i'm not going to do that i'm not going to
doing more of the pillaging thank you very much all right guys let's take a moment and thank our
sponsor for today's show which is of course body brain coffee the brainchild of luis j gomez the
great luis j gomez well if you may know testosterone levels have been declining for decades as a people
we're more stressed we sleep like we sit around all day and none of that is helping and
that's part of the reason why i started drinking body brain coffee body brain is real premium
freeze-dried colombian coffee packed with functional ingredients
that have been linked to testosterone support stress management focus and brain function you've
got tongue cat ali ashwagandha two ingredients that have been studied for their potential to support
healthy testosterone levels stress and performance l-theanine which works alongside the caffeine for
smooth focused energy i can tell you this i've been drinking body brain for months now for like
six months i have one cup every day i feel great it really does make a difference and i highly
recommend it it's a delicious cup of coffee it's going to make you feel better it's a
natural way to boost your testosterone plus you support this show and you support the great luis j
gomez in in his business venture which really he's the reason this show exists to begin with
so make sure you do that bodybraincoffee.com that is the website bodybraincoffee.com
and the promo is dave20 for 20 off your entire order please go there bodybraincoffee.com
promo code dave20 for 20 off all right let's get back into the show let's keep playing
the greatest church in christendom was hagas hagia sophia built in the 6th century a.d by the emperor
justinian it was the largest and most revered church in christendom for a thousand years and
yet in the 15th century settler colonialists under the sultan came in and conquered and settled
and took over asia minor from the byzantines and they slapped minarets and appropriated culturally
appropriated a christian church and turned it into a mosque
they were settlers colonialists mandami's family are settler colonials they were part of a
british imperial project at the turn of the 19th to 20th century who put settlers from other areas
of the british empire into africa to help advance their colonial control of the indigenous people
and even today mondami one percent indian community controls 65 of the gdp of uganda settler
colonialist
i could go on
but this is a ridiculous charge um just pause it right there i don't by the way i don't know
i will i guess i'll defer to victor davis hansen he probably knows this better than me but
i thought that that i was under the impression that that's not what the term settler colonialist
meant and that like the the reason why the british sorry i haven't watched this whole
video through but i thought like the idea was that the british project in in india and africa
wouldn't be settler colonialism it would just be colonialism because they have a mother country
that's what i thought settler colonialism was i thought it was the idea but anyway
uh i could be wrong about that but i thought
that's what the term meant was the idea that you don't have a mother country that you're going to
settle there and colonize at the same time so britain sending people to a colony wouldn't be
settler colonialism it would just be regular old colonialism i thought but i could be wrong about
that and i'll defer to victor davis hansen on all the rest of the history there that has nothing to
do with any of the charges against israel you know and and even like if you were again to even
if you could point to like a more egregious example throughout history that wouldn't prove
that war crimes didn't take place like if somebody were to go like oh you think milosevic committed
war crimes in the serbian civil war she's just seeing what adolf hitler did it's like okay yeah
but milosevic also still committed war crimes that what does that mean all right let's keep going
settler colonialist i could go on but this is a ridiculous charge to lodge against israel when
of all of these
settler colonialists i could go on but this is a ridiculous charge to lodge against israel when of all of these settler colonialists i could go on but this is a ridiculous charge to lodge against israel when of all of these
settler colonial powers it has the longest
settler colonial powers it has the longest
settler colonial powers it has the longest pedigree in one place now we hear about
pedigree in one place now we hear about
pedigree in one place now we hear about ethnically wait wait wait hold on pause it
ethnically wait wait wait hold on pause it
ethnically wait wait wait hold on pause it pause it right there so he just said
pause it right there so he just said
pause it right there so he just said did you catch that line he goes now this
did you catch that line he goes now this
did you catch that line he goes now this is such a ridiculous charge against
is such a ridiculous charge against
is such a ridiculous charge against israel because of all these settler
israel because of all these settler
israel because of all these settler colonialist powers they have the longest
colonialist powers they have the longest
colonialist powers they have the longest settler colonialist powers they have the
settler colonialist powers they have the
settler colonialist powers they have the okay well that would put them in that
okay well that would put them in that
okay well that would put them in that category
category
category again this is so goofy dude the longest
again this is so goofy dude the longest
again this is so goofy dude the longest lineage but who cares like if you have a
lineage but who cares like if you have a
lineage but who cares like if you have a long lineage as a minority in a country
long lineage as a minority in a country
long lineage as a minority in a country that doesn't give other people from a
that doesn't give other people from a
that doesn't give other people from a different continent who maybe share some
different continent who maybe share some
different continent who maybe share some lineage maybe by the way share some
lineage maybe by the way share some
lineage maybe by the way share some lineage with you the right to come in and
lineage with you the right to come in and
lineage with you the right to come in and conquer the place the does that
conquer the place the does that
conquer the place the does that have to do with anything
have to do with anything
have to do with anything let's keep playing
let's keep playing
let's keep playing ethnic cleansing we're told that the
ethnic cleansing we're told that the
ethnic cleansing we're told that the israelis ethnically cleansed
israelis ethnically cleansed
israelis ethnically cleansed uh the gazans and often uh people and
uh the gazans and often uh people and
uh the gazans and often uh people and the west bank i don't know quite what
the west bank i don't know quite what
the west bank i don't know quite what that means but before i try to translate
that means but before i try to translate
that means but before i try to translate it we do know there's a lot of ethnic
it we do know there's a lot of ethnic
it we do know there's a lot of ethnic cleansers mr erdogan the president of
cleansers mr erdogan the president of
cleansers mr erdogan the president of turkey oh my god okay just pause it for
turkey oh my god okay just pause it for
turkey oh my god okay just pause it for a second jesus christ is he actually
a second jesus christ is he actually
a second jesus christ is he actually gonna make me use the term what about
gonna make me use the term what about
gonna make me use the term what about ism i don't think i've ever had to do
ism i don't think i've ever had to do
ism i don't think i've ever had to do that in one of these before
that in one of these before
that in one of these before but what is this there's a people who
but what is this there's a people who
but what is this there's a people who say that israel ethnically cleanse the
say that israel ethnically cleanse the
say that israel ethnically cleanse the people in gaza like i don't know what
people in gaza like i don't know what
people in gaza like i don't know what that means but let me tell you about
that means but let me tell you about
that means but let me tell you about erdogan
erdogan
erdogan let me tell you about some things other
let me tell you about some things other
let me tell you about some things other people have done what does it mean
people have done what does it mean
people have done what does it mean it means that they used to live where
it means that they used to live where
it means that they used to live where israel is now
israel is now
israel is now and then men with guns made a move
and then men with guns made a move
and then men with guns made a move against their will
against their will
against their will and then told them they can't come back
they said remember that house you used
they said remember that house you used
they said remember that house you used to live in
to live in
to live in you don't live there anymore you live in
you don't live there anymore you live in
you don't live there anymore you live in that refugee camp over there
that refugee camp over there
that refugee camp over there okay you follow me you follow me so far
okay you follow me you follow me so far
okay you follow me you follow me so far there's a people they live over here in
there's a people they live over here in
there's a people they live over here in a house
a house
a house man from an israeli militia comes over
man from an israeli militia comes over
man from an israeli militia comes over points a gun at those people says you
points a gun at those people says you
points a gun at those people says you walk this way they don't have a choice
walk this way they don't have a choice
walk this way they don't have a choice they walk that way he says you live in a
they walk that way he says you live in a
they walk that way he says you live in a refugee camp now now they live in a
refugee camp now now they live in a
refugee camp now now they live in a refugee camp this refugee camp is in gaza
refugee camp this refugee camp is in gaza the people in gaza today
the people in gaza today
the people in gaza today well if they're a real old man they're
well if they're a real old man they're
well if they're a real old man they're that guy
that guy
that guy if they're younger than that they're his
if they're younger than that they're his
if they're younger than that they're his kids they're his grandkids
that's what people mean by ethnically
that's what people mean by ethnically
that's what people mean by ethnically cleansed now go on to tell me the crimes
cleansed now go on to tell me the crimes
cleansed now go on to tell me the crimes of other governments
of other governments
of other governments how is this taking on the charge that
how is this taking on the charge that
how is this taking on the charge that israel didn't ethnically cleanse these
israel didn't ethnically cleanse these
israel didn't ethnically cleanse these people here keep playing
people here keep playing
people here keep playing and into israel his government
and into israel his government
and into israel his government not his own but the turkish government
not his own but the turkish government
not his own but the turkish government of which he is a continual
of which he is a continual
of which he is a continual successor to ethnically cleansed all of
successor to ethnically cleansed all of
successor to ethnically cleansed all of the greeks from northern cyprus and
the greeks from northern cyprus and
the greeks from northern cyprus and occupied it and then sent settler
occupied it and then sent settler
occupied it and then sent settler colonial is from turkey i haven't heard
colonial is from turkey i haven't heard
colonial is from turkey i haven't heard anybody complain about that
anybody complain about that
anybody complain about that is there a protest i missed at columbia
is there a protest i missed at columbia
is there a protest i missed at columbia did ilya omar forget that or she just
did ilya omar forget that or she just
did ilya omar forget that or she just gives a pass to a fellow muslim country
gives a pass to a fellow muslim country
gives a pass to a fellow muslim country while october 7th was transpiring
while october 7th was transpiring
while october 7th was transpiring far away in muslim azerbaijan
far away in muslim azerbaijan
far away in muslim azerbaijan they were ethnically cleansing a hundred
they were ethnically cleansing a hundred
they were ethnically cleansing a hundred and fifty thousand
and fifty thousand
and fifty thousand armenians from their ancestral home of
armenians from their ancestral home of
armenians from their ancestral home of nearly a thousand years in the nagorno
nearly a thousand years in the nagorno
nearly a thousand years in the nagorno karabakh corridor i didn't hear a word
karabakh corridor i didn't hear a word
karabakh corridor i didn't hear a word from ilion omar i didn't hear a word
from ilion omar i didn't hear a word
from ilion omar i didn't hear a word from aoc i didn't hear a word for soran
from aoc i didn't hear a word for soran
from aoc i didn't hear a word for soran mandami
mandami
mandami and then we come to
and then we come to
and then we come to medical doctors and supplies to go into
medical doctors and supplies to go into
medical doctors and supplies to go into the target pause it pause it right there
the target pause it pause it right there
the target pause it pause it right there um
um
um i mean jesus christ
i mean jesus christ
i mean jesus christ so he went through the ethnic cleansing
so he went through the ethnic cleansing
so he went through the ethnic cleansing he debunked it by pointing out that
he debunked it by pointing out that
he debunked it by pointing out that there's other states doing bad things
there's other states doing bad things
there's other states doing bad things that people and you don't hear about
that people and you don't hear about
that people and you don't hear about that i mean that is just not a defense
that i mean that is just not a defense
that i mean that is just not a defense against a state committing ethnic
against a state committing ethnic
against a state committing ethnic cleansing
cleansing
cleansing um
um
um again like yeah i know it's just so tired
again like yeah i know it's just so tired
again like yeah i know it's just so tired it goes it's like dude there are other
it goes it's like dude there are other
it goes it's like dude there are other crises in the world that probably
crises in the world that probably
crises in the world that probably deserve more attention than they get but
deserve more attention than they get but
deserve more attention than they get but it absolutely makes sense that the
it absolutely makes sense that the
it absolutely makes sense that the country that is only committing their
country that is only committing their
country that is only committing their crimes because they're backed up by the
crimes because they're backed up by the
crimes because they're backed up by the global empire
global empire
global empire that has a special relationship with
that has a special relationship with
that has a special relationship with that global empire as we discussed
that global empire as we discussed
that global empire as we discussed before it totally makes sense that
before it totally makes sense that
before it totally makes sense that citizens of the country that is the
citizens of the country that is the
citizens of the country that is the global empire would have a special focus
global empire would have a special focus
global empire would have a special focus on the country with a special
on the country with a special
on the country with a special relationship
relationship
relationship it just makes total sense so
it just makes total sense so
it just makes total sense so essentially all of this is just a
essentially all of this is just a
essentially all of this is just a distraction it does nothing to get to
distraction it does nothing to get to the point
the point
the point now um coming on to this genocide claim
now um coming on to this genocide claim
now um coming on to this genocide claim okay so if it's genocide we know it
okay so if it's genocide we know it
okay so if it's genocide we know it we know the countries that commit
we know the countries that commit
we know the countries that commit genocide in the countries that don't
genocide in the countries that don't
genocide in the countries that don't okay well a lot of people are saying
okay well a lot of people are saying
okay well a lot of people are saying they know that israel is committing a
they know that israel is committing a
they know that israel is committing a genocide right now
genocide right now
genocide right now and what is his claim really going to be
and what is his claim really going to be
and what is his claim really going to be here that israel um
here that israel um
here that israel um what because they sent in food
what because they sent in food
what because they sent in food that's this oh we know the states that
that's this oh we know the states that
that's this oh we know the states that commit genocide and they don't send in
commit genocide and they don't send in
commit genocide and they don't send in food like dude i mean
food like dude i mean
food like dude i mean hitler started creating concentration
hitler started creating concentration
hitler started creating concentration camps
camps
camps in what was it
in what was it
in what was it 1940
maybe 39 even
maybe 39 even
maybe 39 even you know
you know in fact i think i shouldn't say that it
in fact i think i shouldn't say that it
in fact i think i shouldn't say that it was even earlier than that there were
was even earlier than that there were
was even earlier than that there were the first concentration camps i think
the first concentration camps i think
the first concentration camps i think there were like a few of them were built
there were like a few of them were built
there were like a few of them were built in the earlier in the mid 30s but like
in the earlier in the mid 30s but like
in the earlier in the mid 30s but like certainly like a bunch of concentration
certainly like a bunch of concentration
certainly like a bunch of concentration camps had been built by 39 1940
camps had been built by 39 1940
camps had been built by 39 1940 um
um
um you know
you know
you know jews there were still jews left there
jews there were still jews left there
jews there were still jews left there not that many but there were still jews
not that many but there were still jews
not that many but there were still jews left at the end of the war
left at the end of the war
left at the end of the war anyway my point being they were feeding
anyway my point being they were feeding
anyway my point being they were feeding them
them
them i mean i don't think they were feeding
i mean i don't think they were feeding
i mean i don't think they were feeding them great through much of the war
them great through much of the war
them great through much of the war i think in fact there were many who
i think in fact there were many who
i think in fact there were many who starved to death i'm not arguing any of that but like
that but like
that but like the so now the
the so now the
the so now the you know the measure for whether you're
you know the measure for whether you're
you know the measure for whether you're ethnically cleansing is has anybody else
ethnically cleansing is has anybody else
ethnically cleansing is has anybody else ethnically cleansed worse and now the
ethnically cleansed worse and now the
ethnically cleansed worse and now the measure for genocide is like well did you
measure for genocide is like well did you
measure for genocide is like well did you feed them okay if some food got in if
feed them okay if some food got in if
feed them okay if some food got in if some aid got in oh some vaccines you
some aid got in oh some vaccines you
some aid got in oh some vaccines you gave rounds of vaccines out then like a
gave rounds of vaccines out then like a
gave rounds of vaccines out then like a i don't know
i don't know
i don't know you know so many of these things are just
you know so many of these things are just
you know so many of these things are just like yeah but none of this is really
like yeah but none of this is really
like yeah but none of this is really how you'd measure why don't you just
how you'd measure why don't you just
how you'd measure why don't you just measure the way they have conducted this
measure the way they have conducted this
measure the way they have conducted this war against the civilian population
war against the civilian population
war against the civilian population and then judge that for what it is why is
and then judge that for what it is why is
and then judge that for what it is why is the measure here how much more
the measure here how much more
the measure here how much more sadistic and cruel they could have been
sadistic and cruel they could have been
sadistic and cruel they could have been or something like that and it also you
or something like that and it also you
or something like that and it also you got to understand why we've been going
got to understand why we've been going
got to understand why we've been going through this for years but the reason
through this for years but the reason
through this for years but the reason why this argument never lands
why this argument never lands
why this argument never lands is because we're also aware of the
is because we're also aware of the
is because we're also aware of the context that israel can't just openly
context that israel can't just openly
committed genocide, right? Like we do recognize that. We recognize that Benjamin Netanyahu can't
just get on TV and go, well, yeah, we're committing a genocide in Gaza. That's what we're doing. Yeah,
they're Amalek. We're destroying their children. We're going to kill them, right? Like if he did
that, the world would put a stop to it. So in other words, yeah, they have to kind of at least
do something. They can't just line up all the people and shoot them. So it just doesn't really
mean anything to go, well, they could have denied more aid. Oh, so when they denied, so after the
area had been fucking war torn for two years and then they cut off all aid for three months to the
poor civilian population, my takeaway from that was supposed to be, but they had aid, you know,
they had allowed it in before and after. Oh, okay. Wow. Do you know, like even, um, by the way,
do you know, like even the numbers that the Israeli exaggeration, their biggest, most ballooned
number was that Hamas had 50,000 fighters at like their height, which I don't believe they ever had
that many, but whatever they claim Hamas had like 50,000 fighters. They've destroyed like 350,000
homes. What is that? You're destroying a people destroy like Gaza. It's one of the oldest, like
continuously populated areas in the world. They just fucking destroyed it, wiped it off the fucking
map.
What are we arguing over? What we call that? Yeah. But some people got sandwiches in the middle of it.
Okay. Yeah. Let's keep playing. We'll wrap up soon.
But more importantly, when Israel was formed by 1950,
there was 170,000 Arabs still in Israel. They comprised 12% of the population. Fast forward to
2026. Guess what? Genocidal Israel saw the population of
arabs who are now israeli citizens oh my god increased to 2 million and the percentage of
non-jews in israel who were arab muslims okay let's just pause it here dude but i mean by the
way i don't even we can pause we could wrap up here but i don't even know um where his numbers
are because those are not the numbers i've seen i thought it was but from what i've read about it
like and i don't know what exactly he's picking a starting point like he picked 1950 for whatever
reason rather than 48 which is the year the country was formed so there might be something
about that but from what i've read it's been about 80 20 from the beginning of of the state
of israel the population do you see what he does there even if that's true even if it wasn't 80 20
the whole time and it was in fact 88 12 at one point and then went from 88 12 to 80 20
and that's his big thing look the arab population inside israel has increased up to 20 percent
and therefore they're not committing a genocide well what's the obvious in that the accusation
isn't that israel's committing a genocide against the arab population of israel it's never been the
accusation the accusation has been that they've committing genocide against the people of gaza
since october 7th 19 20 oh 2023 sorry showed my age there
yeah dude i mean look again the reason why this is why i'd love to debate victor davis
hansen on this because the reason why it's it's important to debate these guys on this is just
to demonstrate how much like they really have nothing and this whole thing this whole goddamn
thing is just kind of like it's all designed to just kind of sound good if you don't like
pick it apart if you don't just think about it and then you go oh yeah no this is all nonsense
nothing all right that's our episode for today we'll be back tomorrow with a brand new one
thanks to everybody for uh tuning in as always catch you tomorrow peace
you
I'll see you next time.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Dave Smith reflects on his early public opposition to Donald Trump, noting he was one of the first prominent figures to call for his impeachment.
He argues that critics of Trump, like Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin, falsely claim that anti-Trump voices are handing power back to Democrats, when in reality, the Democratic party’s policies have long been seen as radical and dangerous.
Smith highlights that the broader anti-woke movement successfully challenged progressive cultural norms, leading to Trump’s 2024 election victory and a significant shift in political power.
He criticizes the political framing of Israel-related accusations, arguing that claims of apartheid or war crimes are often used as rhetorical tricks to discredit the pro-Israel stance without factual basis.
Smith contends that figures like Victor Davis Hanson misuse historical and political arguments, shifting claims or using irrelevant comparisons to deflect criticism.
He emphasizes that truth-telling and political honesty—rather than party loyalty—are central to his podcast’s mission, rejecting manipulation or political maneuvering.
He points out that the Democratic party’s past actions, including mass surveillance and policy overreach, create a legitimate concern about their return to power.
The upcoming midterm elections present a pivotal moment where the strength of Republican institutions and policies will be tested against the perceived threat of a resurgent Democratic agenda.
Summary:
Dave Smith reflects on his role in the political shift away from Donald Trump, noting he was among the first major figures to publicly call for Trump’s impeachment. He argues that critics of Trump, such as Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin, falsely claim that dissenting voices are enabling a return to Democratic dominance, while in reality, the Democratic party has long been associated with radical policies and institutional overreach. Smith emphasizes that the anti-woke movement achieved significant cultural victories, culminating in Trump’s 2024 election win and a realignment of power.
He critiques political rhetoric surrounding Israel, especially claims of apartheid or war crimes, arguing they are often used as rhetorical tricks rather than grounded in evidence. Smith points out that figures like Victor Davis Hanson rely on misleading framing and irrelevant comparisons to deflect criticism. His central stance is rooted in truth-telling and political integrity, rejecting manipulation or partisan spin.
S. approaches the midterms, Smith warns that the Democratic party’s return to power poses a serious institutional threat, and he calls for a clear, evidence-based evaluation of how the Republican administration protected American institutions during a time of political upheaval. The episode also promotes a parasite cleanse by the Wellness Company and highlights Quince’s clothing brand as a personal recommendation.
FAQs
Dave Smith publicly called for Donald Trump's impeachment early in 2025, stating he was one of the first prominent figures to do so. He believes the administration's actions, such as covering up the Epstein files and launching wars without transparency, were deeply problematic and inconsistent with democratic values.
Dave Smith left the Trump coalition due to his belief that the administration’s policies—especially its handling of foreign conflicts and internal governance—were immoral and dangerous. He felt that the administration's actions, like the Iran war, were deceptive and harmful to the nation.
Dave Smith argues that such critics often use fear-based attacks to frame him and others as betraying Trump or aiding the Democrats. He claims these arguments are not grounded in truth but are instead strategic narratives designed to undermine opposition to the Democratic establishment.
Dave Smith rejects such accusations, stating that his criticism is rooted in truth and transparency, not political loyalty. He emphasizes that he has consistently criticized both parties’ policies, especially those involving war, misinformation, and the erosion of democratic institutions.
Dave Smith believes the Democratic Party has been responsible for policies that undermine civil liberties, such as mass surveillance, forced vaccinations, and aggressive social control, which he sees as a threat to American freedom and the rule of law.
Dave Smith warns that the Democrats are poised to regain significant power in the midterms, and he sees this as a serious threat to American institutions. He argues that the Republican victory in 2024 was a major defeat of left-wing cultural and political dominance.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.