Täs bibisi podcast, esi poti by ads outside the UK. Protini nelkev, saarioisten protsku. Ruokaa jossain protiidia ihan luonnostaan. This is the Global News Podcast from the BBC World Service. I'm Charlotte Gallagher, and at 16 hours GMT on Thursday, 12 February, these are our main stories. China's annual carbon emissions have fallen for the first time. They may have peaked, and Ukrainian skeleton Bob Racer is disqualified from the Winter Olympics for planning to compete wearing a helmet depicting appletes killed by Russia. Also in this podcast, a woman abused by Jeffrey Epstein calls on the British Royal family to do more. They can contact me, in the other victims they can contact. The thing is, I just hope they're not just saying this, so I would like to see them actually taking action. And as the North Korean leader Kim Jong-un chosen his teenage daughter as his heir. China may still be the world's largest emitter of carbon dioxide, but levels have been falling due to a push for clean energy. And now new data, says 2025, was the first full year to show a decline. The reported drop in emissions is small, but campaigners say it could be a milestone. Our climate editor Justin Rollett spoke to Oliver Conway about the figures. The first year ever, China emissions have fallen back. They've fallen back might 0.3%. Now that really, really doesn't sound much, but what we're seeing is against a background of level or falling emissions for almost two years now, for 21 months. In fact, they sort of peaked in kind of spring of 2024, and then have fallen back a bit more significantly since then. So what people are saying is, and look, it's couched around with caveats, but it appears we might be seeing the beginning of certainly peaking of emissions in China, and possibly even the beginning of a decline in emissions in China. Sat that in context, China is far and away. The world's biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, notably carbon dioxide, the biggest greenhouse gas. I mean, overwhelming. A third of all emissions come from China. So what happens in China, literally in this case, could change the weather for the rest of the world? Yeah, you mentioned caveats. There is a margin of error on some of this, but take us through which sectors have contributed to it. So what we're seeing is a fall in emissions in transport, power, cement. So huge sectors of the Chinese economy, balanced against that, we're seeing an increase in emissions from the chemical industry. But overall, the net is a slight decrease. So that gives you a sense, I think, of how finely balanced this is. Most sectors in slow decline, one sector increasing quite significantly. So if one of those other sectors changed direction, if for example there was a bit of a building boom in China, started using a lot more cement because use of cement has fallen back, you might see emissions push up, was again. So we're not saying definitively China's reached the peak and it's going to decline. We're saying, "Ooh, this looks like an interesting moment of the Chinese economy. It looks like an interesting moment for world emissions. Let's see what happens." Yeah, because it has a goal of reaching peak emissions by 2030. I was going to ask you if this progress could be reversed, you suggest yes. But is China broadly on track? Broadly on track in terms of peaking, in terms of carbon efficiency, how much carbon dioxide is emitted per unit of production. It's actually way behind its ambitions and is struggling to meet the target set in its 45-year plan. And then we're expecting it to struggle to meet the 15-year plan, having missed the 14th five-year plan. So it's behind on one measure, but in terms of total emissions, we're seeing this leveling potential peak maybe even the beginning of a fall. So basically on the key measures, you know, that should concern us sitting back in the wild looking at what's happening. Yeah, this is, this is, appears to be possibly a significant moment. So beginning to maybe go in the right direction, what is behind China's push towards clean energy? China a long time ago, 20 years ago, or so, recognised a few things. One of which was that climate change was a really serious threat for China, that China's very water insecure, very big, shorter water, climate change was going to affect its agriculture. You know, everything in China was vulnerable to climate change. They needed to do something about that. China wanted to pioneer new industries, and it's all an opportunity in this kind of nascent, this emerging, clean technology industries. So for example, solar power China sent out graduates to places in the developed world that were pioneering solar power, and then brought the technology, brought that knowledge back, and set up in the early 2000s new companies to build solar panels. China has an amazing expertise, that efficient manufacturing, and it brought that to bear on this challenge of producing clean technology and has delivered unbelievable results. And for more on this story, you can go on YouTube, search for BBC News, click on the logo, then choose podcasts, and global news podcast. There's a new story available every weekday. The Ukrainian skeleton racer, BAND, from competing in the Winter Olympics, has said he still doesn't understand which rule he violated. The IOC says it withdrew Vladislav's Haraskević's accreditation because he intended to wear a helmet, featuring athletes killed in Russia's war on his country. Our reporter Sarah Malkaren's told us more. It's been ongoing since Monday here in Italy, when on this first, this initial training run the Ukrainian skeleton on athlete's war, the helmet, it features images of athletes killed during Russia's invasion of his home country. The IOC have been in conversation with Haraskević and his father, Mikhailov, since then about reaching a compromise to allow him to race, because the IOC says the helmet breaks its rules regarding political statements in the field of competition. He was told he couldn't wear it, but he could wear a black armband instead. However, the athlete did not agree with this, insisting that his tribute is no different to those that some other athletes have displayed during these games, such as Figure Skater, Maxine Nohmov. He held up a social of his parents, who were among 67 people killed in a plane crash in Washington DC, just over a year ago, and he held that up while waiting for a sore to be announced earlier this week. This morning, the IOC President, Christy Coventry, met Haraskević, for more conversations with the athlete just prior to his event, but no agreement could be reached. The skeleton racer was banned, he could not compete. Responding to this on social media, he wrote that this is the price of our dignity, and he also spoke to the BBC about the situation. Emptiness, and yesterday was amazing training, before yesterday was also a very good training. It could be among the medalists in this event, but suddenly, because of some interpretation of the rules, which I'm not agree with, I'm not able to compete, while other athletes in the same situation were able to compete, and they didn't face any sanctions. Vladislav Haraskević ending that report from Sarah Milkerens. The messaging service WhatsApp is very popular in Russia. The company says it has more than 100 million users there, but the Russian authorities have confirmed today that they're blocking it. Critics say the move is aimed at pushing its users onto a state-owned app, which is seen as less secure. Olga Ifshina from BBC Russian has been telling us what the Kremlin says are the reasons for its decision. As always, they say that the companies are not following the regulations, not cooperating enough, with the Russian authorities. To be honest, WhatsApp has been significantly slowed down for several weeks now, and actually people were quickly migrating to other messengers, which in turn have been slowed down or blocked as well. Is there a reluctance from a lot of Russians to join this state-backed platform? They want to use other ones that they see as more independent? Yes, exactly as you mentioned. It seems that all these big troubles started after the Kremlin has introduced states approved messenger called Marx, and they are strongly, strongly, strongly encouraging everyone to join. Also using so-to-say administrative resources, many like school chats, kindergarten chats, where teachers and foreign parents about certain things have been moved to Marx. People have to join. On the other hand, people are very much reluctant, because a lot of independent reviews about Marx and a lot of IT specialists raise significant concerns about, you know, data breaches, and it's unclear how much authorities can see and think through that messenger. So, yeah, Russians are trying to use alternative messages, but they're being slowed down or blocked. So, the biggest news of yesterday for the Russians speakers, for people in time, right now.
Russia was the fact that telegram, another very popular messenger where many people moved after what's up was slowed down. Telegram, it was significantly slowed down yesterday. And some experts believe that that's all part of the big strategy of the Kremlin. And is there a feeling that since the start of the Ukraine war, people's internet use in Russia is being more surveilled? Yes, definitely. Since the start of the invasion, Kremlin has introduced draconian laws, strictings of freedom of speech, freedom of expression, and also introducing de facto censorship in the media. That's why people migrated to other platforms, including Telegram, where a lot of independent journalists or bloggers were posting the news. So people trying to diversify their access to information, but they're meeting significant pressure from the Kremlin. Olga Ivtschina from BBC Russian. The actions and the friends of the pedophile Jeffrey Epstein continue to make headlines around the world. We've also been hearing from one of his many victims. Juliet Bryant, who's a former model from South Africa, was groomed and abused by Epstein from 2002 to 2004. She says if the British royal family are concerned for his victims, they should take action by helping to search the emails of Andrew Mount Baton-Winzer, who lost his royal titles over his relationship with Epstein. She's been speaking to the BBC's Mayanee Jones. Although it's been over 20 years since she was abused by Jeffrey Epstein, Juliet Bryant still remembers that period vividly. And a recent release of some 3 million files relating to the convicted pedophile has thrust her into the limelight once more. I feel I suppose vindicated in one way, but in other ways I feel dischattered because I was almost hoping that it wasn't going to all be true. And also the deeper, it's even darker than what I realised, which has been very, very hard to deal with the motion. She's also critical of the royal family's response to the crisis, which has led to Andrew Mount Baton-Winzer losing his title. He's denied any wrongdoing. Well, I think it's great that they've made a statement finally, but the thing is, are they going to actually act on it? I'm willing to speak to them anytime, you know, any way I can help, so they can contact me, and the other victims they can contact. The thing is, I just hope they're not just saying this. I would like to see them actually taking action. Gillin Maxwell is a character that was central to Jeffrey Epstein's operation. She recently made a deposition in the US where she pleaded the fifth. What was your reaction when you saw that? I think it's just ridiculous, you know, after they say that she's going to be giving a testimony and everyone's waiting. It's much like when they say they're going to release the files before, and then they give the testimony, and it's just like they may as well as have not even done it. Because if someone's going to plead the first, why are they even in a bother? Because everyone was waiting for the information. And so I just think they've wasted a lot of people's time, and I think it's really about time that she started speaking out, you know, for her own, you know, personal benefit, because I think anyone who is involved in this will be going to hell. Gillin was just 20 years old when she met Jeffrey Epstein and says she was abused by him from 2002 to 2004. She says she kept going back to him because she appeared for her life. He was a mastermind criminal. He was highly manipulative, and for a 20-year-old meeting someone who was 49 at the time, you know, I wasn't able to, you know, deal with the situation as many of the other young girls weren't. You know, it was also a lot of girls created a sort of Stockholm syndrome where they believed that he cared about them and was going to help. It was like being like a skid mouse around a snake being around him. And, you know, he had a way of manipulating people, and he also made me feel like it was my fault. She hopes other victims will come forward, and that those mentioned in the files will testify before the US authorities. King Charles has expressed concern over the allegations against his brother and says he's forced to remain with the victims. Mione Jones reporting from South Africa. Still to come in this podcast, we remember the life and career of Dawson's Creek Star James Van De Beek. He took this character that was not, you know, a jock, was not the cool kid in high school and made him lovable, and that was not afraid to be emotional. [Music] If there was a big rent button that would just demolish the internet, I would smash that button with my forehead. From the BBC, this is the interface, the show that explores how tech is rewiring your week and your world. This isn't about quarterly earnings or about tech reviews. It's about what technology is actually doing to your work, your politics, your everyday life and all the bizarre ways people are using the internet. Listen on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcasts. North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has never officially confirmed how many children he has, but since 2022, a young daughter has been seen attending public events like banquets and missile launches. Our South Korea's intelligence agency says that daughter believed to be 13 or 14 years old has been selected as his heir and is in the process of becoming the country's next leader. Our correspondent in Seoul, Jake Kwon told me more. She is the only known child of North Korea's leader Kim Jong Un. And she is probably one of the most privileged teenager in the world right now. Anytime we see her on television, she is wearing her hair long, which is usually forbidden for school age young women in North Korea. She is wearing designer clothes, which is out of reach for most North Korean people. And she is on the line to inherit this country that is really dedicated, entirely dedicated for the well-being of just one person at the top. And now what we are hearing from South Korea spy agency is that she was seem to be, she was grooming to be a next heir. Now she seems to be internally decided to become the heir and inherit North Korea from her father. Now her father is only around in his early 40s, likely 42. But it has been a big mystery and a lot of a matter of speculation who is going to take over North Korea when he passes. Now this question of who is going to inherit of course is something that the spy agency has been talking about for the past years. And now we are getting even more definitive answer on what their latest belief is. But this also raises a lot more question. One question is of course why now when Kim Jong-un was selected as the heir, this was just before his father Kim Jong-il was going to pass. So it really seems a lot early. And also it also leaves us the question of what about Kim Jong-un's other children. We understand he also has a son who hasn't been seen on television. So what is going to happen to this older son who is widely speculated to be the next heir in a country like North Korea where male aires are more valued than a female daughter. So just like a lot of things in North Korea when one question is answered a lot more questions start popping up. Jake Won reporting from Seoul. In Madagascar more than 35 people have died after a tropical cyclone with winds of 250 kilometers per hour hit the island nation. The country's president has visited the country's second biggest city, Tomasson, also known as Tamatavi and said 75% of its infrastructure has been destroyed. One of those affected is Denise whose family home was damaged in the storm. Tamatavi is almost destroyed by the cyclone and we had almost six hours of strong winds and heavy rain. I was with my family in the house. The house, I can say, it's a strong house but the house where trembling, like trembling, really, really trembling. And the windows, bricks and lot of water, lot of water in the house. Almost the house are destroyed. The university, the school, the hospital, everything. Our correspondent, Richard Kogoy, gave us this update from Nairobi. The city, Tomasson, which you just mentioned, a city of about 400,000 people has been devastated. Roads have been cut off. If you look even at people's homes, they're not habitable. The roofs are blown off. The port, which is the main core activity of the area, has been quite destroyed as a result of this. We also hear that villages which are literally on the path of the cyclone have also been devastated. The only thing is that the authorities have not been able to carry out a full assessment just to paint the picture in terms of the scale, in terms of human laws and also the devastation that was caused to residents and institutions around there. [BLANK_AUDIO]
how are the authorities responding and getting help into the area? It's really difficult because at the moment the national response has just been focused on the town of Tomasina. They are just using whatever they can, you know, at their disposal with rescue and that emergency services have just been mobilized around the city, trying to reach as many people as they can. The only challenge is that roads have been destroyed, you know, major, major roads. So access is actually very difficult and even for those that have been affected, even getting relief supplies to them, food, water and medicine has really been quite difficult. So that's why actually the President appeal for international support just to help them with visa process. Richard Kegoy. Now, we're going to talk about all things AI, artificial intelligence, a subject about which vast numbers of words are written every week. So many that it's hard for most of us to work out what to think, will AI lead to the end of the world? Or will it make most of our lives much better? Well one particular article this week seems to have struck a chord with more than 70 million views and counting. It's by someone called Matt Schumer, the chief executive of an AI company, and he's warning of the profound impact AI is already having on many jobs, including in the field of AI. Essentially, AI can do those jobs just as well or better and much, much faster. And it'll start doing them not in 10 or 20 years, but one or two. So how alarm should we be? Stephanie Herr is presenter of AI decoded at the BBC and broadcasts and writes on all things tech. She's been telling James Menendez why she's not too worried by the letter. You can tell that he used AI, which he has acknowledged by the way, to write this letter. So it's really, really long, first of all, which is like a telltale mark. Human who had to pass this urine actual editor would have been told, you know, lose 50%. So it's long, it's bulky. It's in the listicle style that we're used to reading when we're told, you know, here's the 10 things you need to do to get a beach body for summer, right? So you can go immediately down to the bottom of the article and see where the where the sell is and his solutions for any of your AI anxiety are as follows. One more AI. He wants you to sign up for a paid version of a tool $20 a month, he says, to spend an hour a day using AI to build things for the next six months. The payoff, he promises you is that you will then understand what's happening with AI better than 99% of people around you, which personally, I think you could get a lot more bang for your book, doing something for an hour a day for six months and, you know, save that $20 a month. There are ways that you can be using AI in your life and experimenting with it that are not so hysterical and breathless as what you're going to read in this article. So what's interesting is why did it go viral? Yeah. Well, why do you think it's got so much traction? Well, I think we're in this period very much like in US politics of flood the zone when it comes to the AI industry. So they've got to keep the party going because loads of people have invested in AI, right? It's just enormous eye watering sums of money. And it really hasn't delivered the return on investment that they need as investors and as companies keep this going. So that's why people are worried that there's a bubble that could burst and whether or not that would percolate out into the wider economy. So that's reason one that I think it's gone so viral as people are like, make sense for me. Is there an AI bubble or an AI apocalypse, which is it's coming for our jobs. We're all going to need to be on universal basic income. When is it coming? He's giving you a nice little timeline there. And it's riffing on previous people who've written essays like this. Yeah. But is that basic diagnosis wrong, though, that it is going to do a lot of our jobs for us? I mean, that's what was my takeaway. It's going to do a lot of tasks for people, but it's not going to be taking everybody's job, but it's definitely not going to be doing it in this sort of short even to medium term timeframe that anthropics CEO Dario Amodei warned about in his 50,000 word essay two weeks ago. There's a habit of people writing these essays and then people engage with them. And it's all very exciting. But we have to actually look at what's happening out in the world. You got eight billion people on this planet. I guarantee that the majority of them are not even using AI today. Right? Including white collar workers around the world. It's just not happening. So it might be happening in Silicon Valley, but it's not happening around the world. So just that's point one for us all to calm down point two. It can do some things really well, but it also does a lot of things not so well. And right now companies can't take the risk on it getting things wrong, right? Because they've got liability risks. They have to train everybody up. They're doing a lot of stages at the moment where they're still experimenting and trying to figure out where is AI actually useful. And where is it not? Definitely here. Finally, the American actor James van der Beek has died at the age of 48 after being diagnosed with bowel cancer. He played the title character in the popular drama Dawson's Creek alongside Katie Holmes, Joshua Jackson and Michelle Williams. Lee Milner has been looking back at his life. How many people James van der Beek was one of the defining faces of late 90s television? I'm a Dawson. Are you Dawson? Dawson, yeah, I know. We met before. I'm Jen. I'll go to the granddaughter from New York, OK? Born in Connecticut, he found fame at just 21, playing Dawson Leary in Dawson's Creek. His intense eye contact and emotional speeches made him the teen heartthrob when the show first aired in 1998. Dawson. I'm telling you before I take it all back, all right? Just go. Nearly three decades later, his famous cry face is still one of the internet's most iconic memes. After his teen drama days, he took on a mix of roles from big Hollywood films like Vastie Blues. This is your opportunity for you. Playing football at Westcain and may have been the opportunity of your lifetime. But I don't want your life. Your comedy roles, including appearances, in shows like Overcompensating. Taking to social media to announce his death, his wife Kimberley Van Der Beek wrote on Instagram that the star passed peacefully and met his final days with courage, faith, and grace. The father of six revealed in 2024 he had bowed cancer. Since his diagnosis, he's used his platform to promote cancer screening. A live spent on screen across decades, ending at just 48. Lee Milner. Emily Longretta from Variety Magazine told us more about James Van Der Beek and how the role he created on Dawson's Creek was so important to the era defining TV show. James Van Der Beek is best known for playing Dawson Leary and the show was built around him and the creator Kevin Williamson has said many times, you know, he told one to tell the story of his life and Dawson was based on him. And he had to find the right person to do that and James immediately stepped into that role and broke through and became such a mainstay in so many TVs and so many living rooms around the world. He took this character that was not, you know, a jock was not the cool kid in high school and made him lovable in this filmmaker and someone that people fell in love with and that was not afraid to be emotional or something that a lot of men on TV, especially young men on TV. And James Van Der Beek was able to do that with such eloquence and his emotion and connection and authenticity really came through the screen as Dawson and really catapulted his career, you know, instead of just being a 90s heartthrob, he ended up going on to do many, many TV shows and films and he became, you know, one of the mainstays of the entertainment world and something that is why this passing is so devastating for so many. That was Emily Longretta. And that's all from us for now. If you want to get in touch, you can email us at
[email protected]. You can also find us on X at BBC World Service. Use the hashtag #globalnewspod and don't forget our sister podcast, the global story, which goes in depth and beyond the headlines on one big story. This edition of the global news podcast was mixed by Holly Smith and the producers were Charles Sanctuary and Stephen Jensen. The editor is Karen Martin. I'm Charlotte Gallagher. Until next time. Goodbye. I've spent the last three decades trying to better understand money across the boardroom, the newsroom and the trading floor as long as the most podcast hosts have been alive. But even I've got questions. Join me, Maran's upset web every week for my show Maran talks Money from Bloomberg Podcasts, where I have in-depth conversations with fun managers, strategists and experts but her market really work. And join me for a separate episode where I answer listener questions and how to make those markets work for you. Follow Maran talks Money on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you listen.
PodcastTranscript AI