Go back

CI to Eye | Your Cultural Compass

25m 53s

CI to Eye | Your Cultural Compass

The transcription begins with an advertisement for Bootcamp 2024, a professional development event for arts professionals in New York City. The core content is a podcast episode previewing the "Cultural Compass" study by CI. This research analyzes campaign data from over 150 arts organizations to provide updated digital marketing benchmarks, addressing how audience behavior has shifted post-pandemic. Key insights include that smaller organizations frequently outperform larger ones in video engagement due to greater nimbleness and content relevance. The data also identifies Q3 (July-September) as a period of high opportunity, with lower advertising costs and higher conversion rates despite lower industry spending. The study further compares exhibition-based and performing arts organizations, noting differences in social media engagement strategies, and provides practical guidance, such as the effectiveness of 1-2 minute videos and the importance of year-round branded search campaigns. The overall goal is to help arts marketers benchmark their performance and optimize future media planning.

Transcription

5054 Words, 27842 Characters

English
When you daydream about a vacation, where does your mind go? A sandy beach? A bustling city? No matter what you choose, it probably involves a dream location away from your desk. That's because the right environments transform our experiences. It's not just what you do, but where you do it. And Bootcamp 2024 has the "where" on "lock." Gather with arts professionals from across the country at one of the dreamiest arts destinations around Broadway. We're talking lights, showbiz, spectacle, and two days of unmatched learning alongside arts lovers just like you. Recharge your creativity with industry leading sessions. Then, take in a post-conference show or stroll down Museum Mile. Join us at the time center in New York City, October 24th and 25th, and escape to a world of artistic inspiration. Treat yourself to a ticket at capacityinteractivebootcamp.com. Hello there, Artificionados and welcome back to CI2i. Now, one of the questions we hear most often from arts marketers is "How do my campaign results compare to those of my peers?" We all want to know how everyone else is doing and it's an excellent question, especially since pre-pandemic benchmarks are all but obsolete right now. Audience behavior has changed so much over the past few years, and if we want to adjust to the demands of today's market, we need updated markers for success. And if you've been listening to the podcast, you know by now that we are relentless, proud data nerds. A lack of measurement just doesn't sit right with us. So, the CI team put together a study based on our own bank of campaign data for over 150 client organizations to uncover brand new digital marketing benchmarks and emerging trends for our industry. It's called Cultural Compass, and in today's episode, we'll preview some of the most impactful findings before it's officially released to the public. That's right, spoilers ahead. I'll sit down with Senior Consultant Ali Blunt to discuss the study's parameters, the biggest surprises in her data analysis, and a few key findings to help inform your FY25 media planning. Shall we dive in? I'm here with Senior Consultant Ali Blunt, one of my favorite people to have on the podcast, and Lead Researcher for CI's brand new Cultural Compass study. Ali, say hello to your many, many fans. All three of them. All three of them. Okay, so my children and my husband. Hello, I'm very excited to be here. So, CI used to release an art industry benchmark study, and this looked at the kind of state of digital marketing practices in the arts. So, how is Cultural Compass different? So, in some ways, it's a 2.0 version, and in some ways it's a completely new study. It's like adjacent to those other studies that we ran, but also a completely new set of questions and things that we're looking at. We actually looked at the data that we have at our fingertips. So, all of the campaigns that we run for our clients throughout the years, we analyze that data to come up with lots of different conclusions, to kind of see what's happening in the world today, in the market digital marketing world. Yeah, and there's been definitely a lot of changes in the industry over the last few years. I'm sure people on the podcast are sick of saying, "Well, the industry's been changed so much over the last few years." Like, unprecedented changes. But it does feel like now would be a good time to look at how we approach digital marketing, right? Yes, and that's the reason that we really chose right now to be the time that we're like, "Okay, we're doing this, we're studying this data." We are emerging from the pandemic, whatever phase of the pandemic we're in. But whatever phase we're in, we're at a point where audiences really have settled. Like, the audience behavior changed throughout, and now we're at a point where it's like we're in that new routine. We have things like AI and machine learning on the rise. We have new platforms like TikTok and Spotify that a couple years ago were brand new, and now they also have kind of settled, and they're not going anywhere, and we have a better sense of like that landscape. So it feels like we're at this really big watershed moment, and that's why we were like, "Okay, this is the moment. This is where we want to be answering all of these questions, and making sure that we're studying this data to really push us forward into what the next level of digital marketing is going to look like." Yeah. I think whenever a big study like this happens, it's an interesting thing about what questions the study is trying to answer. Right? So what were we looking at when we were originally creating this study? Yeah, so the idea for this kind of came because constantly our clients are asking us like, "How do I compare to my peers?" You know, "I'm a museum, and I want to know what are other museums in my area doing?" Or "I'm a theater. What are other theaters doing?" or whatever. So we were really curious to actually be able to answer those questions. So the big one was like, just generally, what can I learn from my peers in the industry that can help really guide my own organization's growth? And then from there, we really took it in a ton of different directions. You know, how does my media spend compare? How can I diversify across other digital channels? What can I learn from other organizations of my region, my budget size, my genre? Yeah. I think like knowing what your peers are doing is such a valuable way of measuring your own performance. And it can be so insular when you're at an organization because you're just in the day today and you don't often think about what's everyone else doing and what can I do differently? And especially with all the changes that have happened recently in the last few years. Things have gone up, things have gone down, but you want to see if that's everyone, not just yourself, right? Yeah, it's really interesting because typically when clients ask us these kinds of questions, often our answer is like, okay, well, you want to benchmark against yourself. You know, if you're a theater in the Northeast, you don't necessarily expect that you're going to perform the same as other theaters in the Northeast for various reasons, you know, even just programming can affect it, like everything can affect it. But that being said, there are definitely some big questions where it would be really helpful and interesting to know how your peers are performing, thinking even about something like budget, where you're looking at, okay, well, what percentage of my budget am I spending on meta versus Google? How much should I be spending? Just having a sense of what your peers are doing, I think, is helpful to guide you because maybe you are spending a lot less than them and you could and should be spending more. Like, you know, some people might be pushed to their max and that's fine, but I think it's interesting to be able to compare and tweak and see if there are best practices that you're not kind of living up to and maybe figure out how you can. Yeah, and seeing what you are outperforming as well, like seeing what you're doing really well, and might want to lean into even more. Oh, yeah, to be able to invest, like if you're really crushing it in the video category, like maybe you want to amp that up and spend even more on video. Yeah. So, eventually we pulled from Client's campaign data for this study. So, we must have a bunch of data. What kind of organizations are represented and what were some of the parameters? What do we look at? Yeah, so I was super excited by the response to this. I was very nervous when we started asking for Client permission because I was like, how many are we going to get? And we ended up getting 152 organizations to agree for us to study their data, which is incredible. It's a much better response than I ever expected. And those organizations across the US and Canada and they are across every, you know, genre and organization size and all of that. So we have the organization size broken down into three buckets. So small, medium, large, small, being $5 million budget or less, or under $5 million. Medium is $5 million to $14.9 million and then large organizations have a budget of $15 million plus. So we're really having kind of everybody represented. I think any organization listening to this, you'll find that your peers represented in this study, especially because we had a massive full of data, which is exciting. We also looked at a full calendar year, which was really important to me. I wanted to make sure that we could study things like seasonality, things like holiday programming. So we looked at last year, so 2023, January 1st to December 31st. Yeah. So this is a huge, huge study. And as you're digging for the data, what jumped out to you? What findings surprised you the most? A lot of things did. Which was really awesome that we ended up finding a lot of things. One that was really interesting was how organization size played into things, looking at large versus small organizations. And there are some things that are expected. Large organizations have larger budgets. And in many cases, of course, they're going to have better performance. We saw a lot of higher ROI's and higher purchase conversion rates and things like that. But what I thought was really interesting is that smaller organizations actually can still hold their own and do so by spending a lot less than medium and large size organizations. The area that we really saw this was it with video, interestingly. So small organizations had the second highest video rates behind medium size. And large organizations actually had the lowest video of your rates. Like anyway, we sliced it, which was really surprising because you think that a large organization has a ton of money to pour into video production. So naturally, their videos must be the best and performing the best. And it was the opposite of that. But they actually had the lowest rates. So it was really interesting. Yeah. Why is that, do you think? Is it because by smaller organizations can generate greater volume of content for their size? Or is it, you know, I always think about the scrappiness in a good way of smaller organizations about being able to just make the content without going through levels of approval? I think that's exactly it. I think that one of the most interesting metrics that we found was that for video view rate, in particular, larger organizations actually had the lowest video view rates. And small organizations had much, much higher video view rates. And I think you kind of hit the nail on the head that a smaller organization is going to be more nimble. So maybe they don't have the ability to like produce this very expensive video. But perhaps they can produce something that's really relevant and fun and engaging in interesting, perhaps that's using like a trending audio or something that's very topical. So I think that they actually in many ways can produce better content on less budget, which we saw because we saw stronger video view rates for small organizations. I think the last two boot camps we've done, we've had people talking about TikTok. And they emphasized how important it is to follow these trends and just make the video and put it up there without worrying too much about if it's perfect, you know, on the platforms better than perfect and not on the platform. 100%. So I've worked at larger organizations and I've seen what it's like to get lots of approvals. And it can take a while. And that's just not something that works as well when you're looking at content creation. At the end of the day, you need to make really compelling content. And you can always do that if you're like waiting two weeks to be able to get it approved. And I don't mean to sparse large organizations. They obviously still perform very well. They all are doing great. But that's a lot for a reason. But I just small organizations, I wouldn't want them to be like, well, we don't have a budget to produce things. I want to give some hope there that you can still make incredible content and see incredible campaign results, even if you don't have a lot of budget and a lot of staff and things like that. You just need to make incredible content that is tailored to your specific audience. And no matter what size organization you are, there's always wins that you can have, regardless of like branded campaigns for search. Yeah, you can run branded campaigns regardless of your organization size. And like you said, it's such an easy win because I mean, my personal recommendation is that anybody, any organization, size type should be running a brand at search campaign year round. And we saw, you know, the results really supported that. So like that's a huge win that anybody can do. Things like shifting some money to Google, which I definitely want to talk about can be a really easy win too. Yeah. So obviously size of organization can make a big difference, but we also looked into different genres as well, right? We did. Yeah, we looked at every genre within the arts. For ease of interpreting results, we broke it down into two buckets. So we had like exhibition, exhibit-based organizations, you know, museums and things like that. And then we had performing arts kind of all lumped together. And we did see some really some interesting results. One thing that was fascinating to me is that the exhibition-based organization saw stronger engagement rates for their meta posts. And one theory we have behind that is that the exhibition-based organizations do a really good job at representing what it's like to actually visit the organization. Like you in a lot of these posts, you can really see like when you go to visit the museum, you know what it's like, you know what you're looking at, you know, whatever exhibit or whatever the entrance is like that, that's really part of the post just inherently. Whereas performing arts posts tend to focus a little bit more on the art itself, which is there's nothing wrong with that. Like that's really important. People need to know what they're going to go see, but the thing that's really missing is like what that experience is going to be like, which is often what gets people out of the door and out of their house is what the whole experience is, not just the art itself. So I think that that's something that performing arts organizations can learn from the exhibit-based is really focus on like the full picture from A to Z as opposed to just like the middle section where you're actually seeing the show. Yeah, like capturing that excitement of going into a theatre, I think is like every time I go in and like get my seat and flick through the play-bill and pretend to read it. I mean it doesn't surprise me that you're not a play-bill reader. No, my wife is she flexes, she flexes all the play-bills. Well, she's better than you. Yeah, yeah, yeah, well, in every way, yeah, definitely. And yeah, I mean, like capturing the sort of magic as you walk into a theatre, I always get so excited like in my belly when I walk into a theatre. In your belly? Yeah, like I feel like a kind of like, almost like butterflies a little bit whenever I walk into like a big theatre or even a little theatre, to be honest, like it's just exciting like to sit down and like capturing that inside and add it, I think is a really strong move. Oh yeah, when you said little theatre, just maybe think I, I took my kids to see the Little Mermaid at like a very tiny theatre this weekend and it was my daughter's first show, she's two and she did amazing. She sat quietly the entire time in front of her. But I'm going to fully admit that I cried when we walked in and they like were both looking around at the theatre and it was just like so sweet and they were so excited and like I fully cry at the Little Mermaid. Because I was just like this is just such like an experience in a moment. It was just like so exciting for them to like witness this live amazing thing. Yeah, I mean like little theatres are there's something magical and scrappy and fun about little tiny theatre. Like I do improv every two weeks in a little 30 seat theatre and it's tiny but that packed out is magical, you know, like when people when people are like jammed in so a tiny theatre, that's an experience that you can't necessarily replicate a lot of bigger venues, you know. Do you get jam packed crowds we're involved? Are we actually doing alright? Yeah, we do. We've been selling out. Like not in the past. I'm happy for you. I've done the Edinburgh Fringe a few times. I definitely had light audiences of just one or two people before. It's more intimate. Yes. Yeah. What a diplomatic way of putting that. What about the other way? Is there anything that you think exhibit-based organisations can learn from performance-based organisations? Yes, the performing arts organisations some much stronger video rates. So like video-view rates were a lot higher for performing arts and our reason for that is they just tend to be more dynamic which is not fair to exhibit based organisations of course like, you know, visual art is inherently kind of static. There are very few, you know, visual arts exhibits that are moving in dynamic. It happens but not always. Whereas performing arts is very dynamic and that makes a more dynamic video just like inherently. So those videos tend to perform a lot better. So I think that's something that exhibition-based organisations could work on is making sure that their video content in particular is really dynamic. It's a great reminder of just creating compelling content in general. And you also researched ideal video length for these paid campaigns, right? Yeah. So we've talked a lot about video and I think that one of the big questions that I certainly always get from my clients, I'm sure every single consultant that's the I get from their clients is like, what is the best video length? And I hate to give an answer to that because ultimately the answer is like the best video length is making a video that is strong and compelling and wonderful with the time that you need. But if we want to put an answer behind it, which people do- Such a consultant answer by that. But if we're going to put an actual number behind it, we really did see spikes at like one to two minutes, one to two and like between those, where when we saw a lot of spikes in kind of all the metrics, engagement rate, video viewer page viewer, etc. So I hate to say it, but there was a sweet spot there of one to two minutes. Although we still also did see strong results kind of with videos across the spectrum. So all that to say is if you're making a video, use the amount of time that you need to use. If you need to make a five minute video and that's the best way to tell your story, then do it. We saw plenty of five minute videos that had amazing results. But if you don't need a five minute video, then maybe try to edit it down to like 60 seconds or so. Yeah. I think a lot of listeners are deep into the FY25 strategic planning sort of stage of the year. And as they put media plans together for the next season, what do you think of some of the biggest opportunities according to this data? So there are a lot. I think the one that I'm most excited about just because it was like honestly kind of wild as I kept doing the data analysis and kept seeing the results come in is Q3. So July through September, we see a ton of opportunity there. It was very interesting because organizations spend the least we looked at media spend for each quarter. And the lowest media spend was in Q3. But on the flip side, all of the other metrics were better in Q3. So CPA cost per acquisition was at its lowest in Q3. CPM, how much, you know, effectively how much we're spending on these ads was at its lowest in Q3. Patriots were highest in Q3. Purchase rates were highest in Q3. So it's an interesting thing where nobody's spending there as much. But the people who are spending are seeing the best results of the year. I think like many organizations are dark in the summer months, right? Like it runs from like September to May. And so we think naturally as marketers, we're like, well, if not selling anything, let's turn off the tap and save some money, right? That's not always the best use of our time and money. No, it really isn't. It's kind of like out of sight out of mind where if you're not running then by the time you start up again and you have tickets on sale or programming starting, you might not be top of mind for people. So I think this is a huge opportunity to make sure that at the very least that you have a branded campaign running, if not, you know, if you're selling tickets, if you start on your on sales then make sure you have an on sale campaign. If you are starting actual performances, have a single ticket campaign. And there's lots of options there that you can be doing with that type of campaigns, but just have something going. What are some other ways you can change up your marketing mix? You mentioned like prioritizing Google as well, which you've already chatted about a little bit. Yeah, so one of the interesting things that we found is that people tended throughout 2023 to invest more in meta. The split was roughly looking at meta and Google specifically. The split was roughly like 60, 40-ish give or take. And that makes sense. You know, meta has incredible results. And the one thing we found though is that we are seeing really strong results recently from Google. Google has really done a lot of investment in their dynamic ads, then their machine learning to make sure that their their campaigns are going to perform really well. And we're seeing that play out. We saw crazy high results for a lot of Google campaigns. So we're not necessarily saying like take all of your meta money and put it in Google, because that's not what I'm able to do. Meta is still really important. And it still does really, really well. But if there are ways to make sure that you can shift a little to Google, or just make sure you have a presence on Google, that is definitely something we're recommending. Like I said, people aren't spending there as much. I'm sure many organizations have no Google budget. So just explore that and tap into Google and really try to spend a little bit there if you can. I think that becomes a little easier when we think about things like Performance Max and demand-gen campaigns, which are performing really, really well at the moment, right? They are. That was the most interesting, one of the most interesting takeaways I think was how well Performance Max is doing. What is Performance Max just so we can like it, because it's a weird concept, right? So Performance Max is basically letting you tap into all of the Google inventory. So you run your one ad, you give Google all of your assets, like your copy, your imagery, which can be video and it's static image. And you put it all in there and then they're going to serve out the best possible ad combinations. So we're going to piece those together, best possible ad combination for each person on the best possible placement for each person, which is kind of where that interesting twist is. So you can tap into Gmail and YouTube and all the different places from this one campaign. It's a little bit of a black hole because you're trusting the Google algorithm and you're not telling it like I want to serve x amount of impressions on YouTube or anything like that, I will fully admit that I was a skeptic when it was first announced. I have a tendency to not trust the machines and AI. Well from sci-fi films, I feel. Sure have. But especially coming out of this study and seeing just how high the result are for Performance Max, I am truly converted. I've been telling all my clients that we need to run and we have that we need to run on Performance Max. So like unsurprisingly for Google, paid search was the top. It was performing the highest for any metric. You name it. Yeah, that makes sense. Which makes sense. Yeah, of course. We would expect that. But next pretty much every case, I don't think there was ever a metric that there wasn't true. Next was Performance Max. And then there was you know, some various mix with the next three of a display, demand, gen and YouTube. But the top two by far like solidified were paid search and Performance Max. And that was really interesting because there are very few people who actually are running Performance Max campaigns. So it's a huge opportunity for people to shift their budget to be running there. Also keeping in mind that you need to be running paid search when you run Performance Max just as like a FYI. Yeah. So all of this information is super helpful and I think a really good preview of the cultural compass findings. When it's just coming out and where can people find it? Yeah. So it's going to be released in June on CI's website. So you can go there to find it when it's published. If you're not already on CI's list, I highly recommend signing up for our emails so that you can be one of the first to know when it actually gets published. And it's a huge study, right? Like how do you, how's the best way to approach this study? And what can we take from it? So I think that so the main thing that I when I started this study, the research for it was I really wanted to make sure that it was actionable. That was like my number one goal here was whatever the results are, whatever we have. I want to make sure that people can read this. And that they can take action from it and apply the findings. There's nothing worse than having a bunch of data and then just thinking cool, I'm not doing anything with it, you know? Yeah, especially because like, you know, we we're in this work all the time and we have a tendency to like be really in the weeds and I wanted to make sure that we're zooming out and making sure that anybody reading this is going to understand the results and also know what to take away from them. So for every piece of data for every metric and benchmark and question that we answer, we have an explanation of like what it's actually saying and showing. And then we also have our CI recommendations for every single piece of data. So it's like what if you are meeting the spent truck or not like what you could be doing, here's the big takeaway from this. All those kinds of things are in there to make sure that you can really take action and apply this to your next season and beyond as you plan. Yeah, I'm really excited for clients to dig into this and see all the work that you've done in this study. I think it's such a useful resource especially as we're planning the next year for marketing. So thank you so much for joining us and talking through the Cultural Compass. Thanks for having me as always. Thank you for listening to CI2i. This episode was edited and produced by Karen McConnate and co-written by Karen McConnate and myself Dan Tidness. Stephanie Medina and Jess Barraby are CI2i's designers and video editors and all work together to create CI's digital content. Our music is by Who Is Uzo. If you enjoyed today's episode please take a moment to rate us or leave a review and nice comment goes a long way in helping other people discover CI2i and hear from experts in the arts and beyond. If you didn't enjoy today's episode, pass it on to all of your enemies. Don't forget to follow us on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn and YouTube for regular content to help you market smarter. You can also sign up for our newsletter at capacityinteractive.com so you never miss an update. And if you haven't already, please click the subscribe button wherever you get your podcasts. Until next time, stay nerdy.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. Bootcamp 2024 is a professional conference for arts marketers in New York City, focusing on creativity and industry learning.
  2. The podcast introduces "Cultural Compass," a new industry study analyzing digital marketing data from over 150 arts organizations to establish post-pandemic benchmarks.
  3. Key findings reveal smaller organizations often achieve higher video engagement rates due to agility, and that Q3 (July-September) presents a major opportunity with lower costs and higher performance metrics.
  4. The study compares performance across organization sizes, genres (exhibition vs. performing arts), and offers tactical advice, such as ideal video length (1-2 minutes) and the universal value of branded search campaigns.

Summary:

The transcription begins with an advertisement for Bootcamp 2024, a professional development event for arts professionals in New York City. The core content is a podcast episode previewing the "Cultural Compass" study by CI. This research analyzes campaign data from over 150 arts organizations to provide updated digital marketing benchmarks, addressing how audience behavior has shifted post-pandemic.

Key insights include that smaller organizations frequently outperform larger ones in video engagement due to greater nimbleness and content relevance. The data also identifies Q3 (July-September) as a period of high opportunity, with lower advertising costs and higher conversion rates despite lower industry spending. The study further compares exhibition-based and performing arts organizations, noting differences in social media engagement strategies, and provides practical guidance, such as the effectiveness of 1-2 minute videos and the importance of year-round branded search campaigns.

The overall goal is to help arts marketers benchmark their performance and optimize future media planning.

FAQs

Cultural Compass is a new study by CI that provides updated digital marketing benchmarks for the arts industry, created because pre-pandemic benchmarks are now obsolete and audience behavior has changed significantly.

Smaller organizations often achieve strong results with lower budgets, especially in video, where they had higher view rates than larger organizations, likely due to being more nimble and producing timely, engaging content.

Exhibition-based organizations saw stronger engagement rates on Meta by showcasing the full visitor experience, while performing arts organizations had higher video view rates due to more dynamic content, offering lessons for both genres.

While compelling content is key, the data showed a sweet spot of 1-2 minutes for video length, with spikes in engagement and view rates, but effective videos can vary in duration based on the story being told.

Q3 (July-September) presents a major opportunity, as it had the lowest media spend and CPMs but the highest purchase rates and lowest cost per acquisition, suggesting underutilized potential.

Organizations can benchmark against peers by budget, genre, and region to identify areas for growth, adjust media spend, diversify channels, and leverage best practices highlighted in the data.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.