Can AI Help Us Discover the Truth? AIDOP, Enlightened Populism, and the Future of Democracy

Amejdi, alaikombaakut.gif. Umejdi, alaikombaakut.gif. ,"Provolkatsism" And he is the line you're asking about, you're actively making your mind short. In today's world of social media, misinformation, police car, polarization and A-Agenie Richard Consent, how can an ordinary person actually do this effectively? Well, first of all, social media relies on personalization, showing each person content based on their historical interactions within the platform. This ultimately frets a situation which a person uses social media as an endless state of voice confirmation, even if the person doesn't suffer from confirmation bias. So people need to rely a little less on social media and rely a little more on pulling data from search engines and LLAMS. But even search engines and LLAMS can turn into equal chambers if not used wisely, as they both rely on historical data of interactions as well. So using private incognito mode occasionally while submitting queries through multiple search engines and digging deep for multiple sources is advisable. Same goes for LLAMS with the additional feature of intentionally getting into a debate with the LLAMS by prompting it to take a position opposing to yours. So as a golden rule, you will always have to seek positions or views that are opposing to own view in order to explore reality and get closer to the truth. So whether you can rely on LLAMS or human beings or both. You are reading books exploring subjects ranging from global justice to truth, money, and human behavior. As the heart of all these different subjects, what question are you ultimately trying to answer about humanity? I'm trying to achieve the set of values I told you about. I believe in justice, freedom, truth, telling, compassion, and solidarity. I'm trying to get as close as possible to these five values in my own life and then by right. One of the suggested discussions of PIC is analyzing what you describe as "Ship mentality." Why do you think human beings are sometimes so willing to follow the crowd rather than independently investigating information? Well, cheap mentality isn't my own terminology. I use terminologies as the following. I use the following terminologies, inviting populism, blind elitism and ignorant populism. Ignorant populism involves the absence of investigation where you're lying on feelings or trans. And this is closest to what people call "treat mentality." So I believe people tend to do that because investigating for the truth requires cognitive energy. That not everyone is willing to spend. So you advocate for uniting the world under a single government ruled by a citizen assembly. That's a huge proposition. Why do you believe a single global government is necessary? Because of the problems we're facing today and in the future, we are facing problems such as climate change, a global issue, especially recurring pandemics and billionaires breed. billionaires breed is represented in AI taking over our jobs, represented in wars all over the world through military industrial complexes, represents an extreme wealth inequality, stuff like that. So these three main issues, climate change, potentially occurring pandemics and billionaires breed can be effectively resolved through a global government. This breed, we can tax billionaires out of existence by setting a health cap at $999 million per person all over the world. And this requires a global government or a global structure because billionaires can typically hide their money in tech servants all over the world in certain places around the world if we don't have a global structure. Climate change we can face it in terms of adaptation and mitigation. Effectively by having a global government, a single unified global government. And same goes for potentially recurring pandemics. We can address the root causes of the pandemics and then move forward while limiting them and enhancing our responses to each pandem. How would your proposed system prevent one person, one political group, or one institution from gaining too much power? Well, relying on citizen assemblies, each person will have an equal vote. We'll vote directly on all issues, your own citizen assembly would be by far 10 minutes away from your home. So you will be within your own community, you will have issues to vote upon that are local issues for this specific community and other issues that shall be coordinated through facilitators that will require the votes of all citizen assemblies. Each human being will have an equal vote additionally, it will be difficult to buy a human's vote because we will introduce shelter, access to cream, water and food, education, healthcare, freedom of expression, freedom of movement and stable speed internet connections as basic human rights. So when we introduce these basic human rights, we'll expand them at a class and when we eliminate billionaires, we will eliminate the class that benefits the most from the current system that buys votes and it shall be very difficult, almost impossible to buy votes, to buy enough votes within the current system to be able to take control over decisions made. Do you think humanity is becoming better at finding truth, or are we becoming better at creating convincing version of reality? I believe many human beings around the world are becoming lazy in terms of truth seeking and this shall change. I have this idea that this may change in the future and that future generations may become better at truth seekers than we are today. So looking ahead, 10 or 20 years, what concern you most about at sufficient intelligence? What concerns me most is the threat that it may come up with their own personalities and get out of control, get completely out of control, that's the one concern. The other concern is the current system keeps on moving forward, we'll have all of the AI tools and technology in control, controlled by a few billionaires around the world and these billionaires will keep controlling the planet with this new technology, we will have this topic in the future, so these are the main concerns regarding AI tools. The one's one question you believe humanity is not vaccine enough, can we all unite under a single government? And if you could have a conversation with every young person in the world for five minutes, what would you tell them about thinking independently and finding their place in society? Okay, so I'll go on for five minutes, that's what you know. I'll go on for five minutes, that's what you want. Let me repeat a question, if you could have a conversation with every young person in the world for five minutes, what would you tell them about thinking independently and finding their place in society? Well, I'll tell them about my own philosophy and how it may help them with your practice dimension, so I'll introduce AI-DUP, which starts for AI debates on one's publications and then advise them to start applying it, and then I'll introduce them not in populism as a behavioural pattern of communication that involves listening to multiple experts trying to understand how they reach certain conclusions and investigating the information to describe the truth, as it contrasts with the two dominant behavioural patterns of communication in today's world, blind elitism, which entails blindly following an expert to run a lead on a certain issue, and ignorant populism also involves the absence of investigation while relying on feelings or trends. I'd also advise them that we will need to verify the world under a single global government ruled by hyperlocuses and assemblies, and I'll tell them that future generations shouldn't repeat the mistakes of previous generations, they should have a better future by voting on issues for themselves instead of relying on corrupt politicians to vote on before. So, can you elect me, electing us more about populism? No. The populism involves the absence of investigation while relying on feelings or trends. So, for example, you have people who rely on feelings or trends and believe that climate change isn't a real threat, it's a hoax, stop like that. This is ignorant populace. Okay. One minute. After everything you have, we have discourse, AI, philosophy, democracy, global government, social justice, wet inequality and the search for truth. If you could live humanity with just one idea to think about, what would that idea be? No one knows 100% of all truth and all matters, who's seeking is always sexy and always appealing and it's aversion and so on. So, do you think global government is inevitable or optional? I believe it's enough. So one word that describes the future of humanity. The future of humanity shall be beautiful. In this case, we shall expand the middle class by introducing shelter access to clean water and food, education, health care, freedom of expression, freedom of movement and stable speed internet connections as basic human rights. So we shall expand the middle class, then we will eliminate poverty and eliminate wars and then these human beings will have a better life and by expanding the middle class we will unlock the creative parts of humanity, we will have more authors, more philosophers, painters, artists, filmmakers, we'll have more people relying on their creativity. We'll unlock the creativity of the overall population. So, and for you, is it a direct democracy or representative democracy? Direct democracy all the way, we need the direct democracy, we need to vote on issues on our own. OK, so once you wish people understood about AI, this has been such a fascinating conversation. I really appreciate the way you have challenged also to think beyond simple answers and so question not only what other people believe, but also the ideas we personally hold. From AI, D.O.P. and the SKI use of AI to elect the populism, direct democracy, citizen assemblies, global governance, and many of the truths you have certainly gave us a lot to think about today, and I think that one of the most important things in philosophy can do, not necessarily give us all the answers, but teach us to ask better questions. For someone listening who wants to connect with you, lemme about you, how can they connect with you? They can come at me through my website, www.hamednabildo12, m-o-h-a-m-e-d, n-a-d-i-l.w-o-r-l-d. It would be helpful if you can leave the link in the show. OK, thank you very much. Thank you so much for joining me today on Rapid Gifts, it's a pleasure to have you on the show. And to everyone listening, thank you for spending this time with us. Remember, don't just accept an idea because someone believes it, take the time to listen, question, investigate, and think for yourself. Until next time, keep learning, keep growing, and keep on wrapping the stories and ideas that shape our world and give to your onboards, and this has been on Rapid Gifts. See you in the next episode. Thank you very much, Ma'am. It was such a honor to have you on this show. Thank you for hosting me. It has been a pleasure. So I will have this in mind, direct democracy only. Hmm. Yeah, they have democracy only all the way. Yeah, all the way, OK?