Buyer Beware: The Rise of Debt in Music Rights Deals
14m 38s
Guillaume Deschalandar, from Bank of California, predicts a major surge in capital flowing into the music industry, driven by rising interest in leveraging music catalogs through borrowing and financing. While borrowing allows artists to retain ownership and control over their work, he cautions that not all lenders are trustworthy—especially private lenders who may take aggressive actions if repayments fail. He emphasizes the importance of choosing regulated financial partners and understanding loan structures, such as loan-to-value ratios, to avoid risks. The market shows clear signs of growth, with music-backed securities jumping from zero in 2020 to over $4 billion in 2025. This trend signals deeper market sophistication but also potential over-leveraging, highlighted by rising LTV ratios beyond typical levels. The episode also features a cultural insight: Katy Perry’s 2011 song “The One That Got Away” is currently the top TikTok song of the summer, illustrating how algorithmic platforms can redefine music popularity despite critical skepticism. Ultimately, the Trappital Summit serves as a pivotal event for industry leaders to network, explore innovation, and navigate the evolving landscape of music finance and technology. Success in this environment requires awareness, strategic planning, and expert guidance.
(upbeat music)
I'm Dan Runcy, welcome to Trappital.
And here we are, this is Summit Week.
This is our biggest week of the year for Trappital,
where Tuesday, September 15th is our third annual
Trappital Summit in Hollywood.
We'll have a number of speakers
across music, media, technology, and entertainment
that are truly building that next frontier of technology
and where things are heading in this industry.
But most importantly, the room is full of a lot of those
same people that are pushing the boundaries
that are gonna be building this industry.
And we're gonna have an opportunity to meet with them,
build relationships.
One of the things that I was most grateful for last year
was hearing the relationships, the partnerships,
the job opportunities, the investments,
everything that came from this event we had.
And I'm grateful that we're able to provide that as well,
including the other events that we have around the summit.
It's a fun week, really excited for it.
And I'll tell you this, our event producer
probably wouldn't want me to tell you this
because we're pretty much at capacity.
But if you still wanna get in and you're gonna be in town,
we will have the link up available on our website.
I can't promise it'll be there the whole time.
But if you still wanna get in, tap the link in our bio
or go to Trappital.com/Summit
and you can get a ticket to join us at our third summit,
can't wait and hopefully we'll see you there.
In this week's episode, this will be a short one.
Of course, our main focus this week is the summit
but we still wanted to share one more bold prediction
and this bold prediction is from the executive vice president
of media and entertainment at the Bank of California.
His name is Guillaume Deschalandar.
I had a really fun time with this one.
And he has a bold prediction
that I don't think a lot of people have heard
or a lot of people have said behind closed doors
but it's time to have more of these conversations.
So I think you'll enjoy it.
You'll also hear our chart metric stat of the week as always.
So get ready and again, if you wanna join us at the summit,
the link is in our bio but here I will turn it over
so you can hear from Guillaume himself.
All right, we are back with another
bold prediction segment leading up to our Trappital Summit
and we are joined by Guillaume Deschalandar
from Bank of California.
Welcome to the show.
- Thank you, great to be here.
- Look forward to seeing you at the summit
but this is our bold prediction segment
and as you know, we wanna hear your predictions
on where things are going.
So what do you got?
Where are we heading?
- I think being a banker, I'm gonna focus on the capital
and I think we're gonna see a continued increase
in capital influx in the industry.
I will just say a health warning should come attached
to this buyer beware.
And if you're European like me,
you'd like probably to say it in Latin, caveat, empty.
- So buyer beware, say more about that.
- I think it's important for people to realize
that there are different types of capital
that is made available.
And so if you own your music publishing rights,
if you own your recordings, you've got a very precious asset.
It may make sense if you are an active composer
during the middle of your career.
You may say, well, actually I don't want to just let go.
This asset that generating a lot of revenue,
I should perhaps borrow against it.
So at least I'll return ownership of my asset.
It's my baby, I've created it, I've composed it.
I don't want to let go of it.
I want to control it, see how it's operating.
And then borrowing can be a great thing.
And it's true, and borrowing is very powerful.
You just need to realize that with an influx of capital,
not every lender are made equal.
And I'm not going to go into too much of the technicalities
of the different types of debt that exist,
but there are different types of debts,
and not every lender are made equal.
And if you're landing with people who are
what we call private lenders,
there is potentially a high a chance that they may
behave away in a way that is less borrower friendly.
In some circumstances, not true of all of them.
There's some very good private credit out there.
Very much so, and we work with a lot of them.
But you need to realize that if you're
pushing the boat out a little bit too much,
a lender is going to have some rights
to take actions, to protect the loan on recovery,
the capital that is deployed.
And that may mean that if you're leveraging too much,
I use the multiple you're putting on the value of the asset
against which you borrow is too high.
And the actual revenue being generated
doesn't meet expectation.
At maturity, IE, when the loan is due and payable,
you're going to have to have a conversation with your lender,
because by definition you won't have repaid the loan in full.
And this is when situation can sometimes,
if you don't have the right partner,
become a little difficult.
Some people, some lender may take a very harsh view
and say, "Dominic's due, you didn't pay me.
I'm going to foreclose, essentially,
and I'm going to take your baby away from you."
If you deal with a regulated bank that is much less likely
to happen, and the bank is always
going to try and work with people to find a solution,
you extend a maturity date, you did a bunch of things
that can be done, a smaller, newer lender will perhaps,
and this is the point with that new influx of capital.
You have new entrants in the market
who perhaps enter the market without understanding
fully the music asset class, as well as others may do.
And that's when you may find yourself in a situation
where people stop overreact.
And in the absolute worst case scenario,
you could use your catalog.
So if you're borrowing to retain ownership,
and you add up in a situation where you're losing it
because you've not repay the loan,
that just defeats the whole purpose of the exercise.
Hence the health warning,
know whom you're getting into your relationship with,
understand the structure that is put in place,
understand the tools that are made available to the lender,
it's always the same tool, so it doesn't really change much,
but understand whom your lender is, and how they behave,
so that you avoid this kind of situation
that would be unfortunate.
Now, I really want to say,
none of those situations have materialized so far,
so perhaps I'm going down the rabbit hole,
some people say what I'm seeing, you know, the negative.
But I think as we're seeing an increase in activity
in the market, more and more people borrow,
people should be aware.
And it doesn't mean that people should be scared of borrowing.
Certainly I make a living out of lending to people,
so people should not be scared,
but people should be aware of what they're getting into.
- Let's take a break for a chart metric,
Stat of the Week.
The Song of the Summer, according to TikTok,
for 2026 on both its global and U.S. charts,
is Katy Perry's The One That Got Away.
A 15-year-old song from 2011 is The Song of the Summer
on TikTok, the social network that many people see
as a key engine for music discovery,
especially for younger generations.
Let's sit with this for a moment,
because if you spend a lot of time listening
to podcasts that are critical about music culture,
or if you spend a lot of time on X or other platforms,
you may think that Katy Perry's a laughing stock,
especially if you are of a older generation.
You may think that some of her music and her antics
may not have aged the best as others.
I'll still defend the song Teenage Dream,
but I understand where people are coming from,
but that said, everyone is in their bubbles,
because if you go and see what's happening on TikTok,
this song is clearly more popular there
than L.O. Langley, Choose and Texas,
which, according to Billboard,
is the most popular song of the summer.
It just goes to show how different,
each of these different silos are,
and to add more proof to that,
chart metric has their chart metric, artist rank,
which measures the popularity of artists
on 16 different metrics,
including different streaming services and socials.
Katy Perry is currently 22.
Early points this year, she was as high as 12,
but she's never been lower than 40 in the past few years,
and it just goes to show that when you look at things
in totality, how we talk critically about people,
may not actually be the reality.
It may be the reality in some of our bubbles,
but that is not the totality.
It says a lot about where we are.
It says a lot about a 15 year old song
that can get to this level,
and it also says a lot about Katy Perry herself.
Let's get back to the episode.
So I think it's safe to assume that
borrowing and who you may borrow from
is slightly different from, let's say,
in an alternative world, you were to sell
and who you would be straight up buying or selling from, right?
Sure, you want to make sure you're doing business
with good people either way,
but once a deal is done,
there's less on the line as in terms of borrowing,
which I can't see, height and mistakes.
And it also makes me think of the weekends deal
with, believe it's lyric capital,
and I assume that your thought is less of a statement on,
lyric or whoever, just more broadly,
there are more people that want to do this.
Correct, and I think you raise a very important point.
There is, and this is the beauty of where we are
in the market with that influx of capital.
There are many, many, many ways of skinning that cat.
You can do a straight sell,
and as you say, one and done,
you've lost the control, but you've got the cash, perfect.
Pure borrowing, you have to repaid
with the house running I mentioned earlier,
and anything in between, you know,
what we call a capital stack,
where you stack on top of each other,
different types of capital,
senior debt, medicine in debt,
equity in most sophisticated cases,
and really there is no one-size-fits-all.
It really depends on your situation.
The type of catalog you have,
the objective you have for the long term,
the strategic partner you're getting again
in the transaction with,
all of the elements are gonna be a factor
the decision you make.
But I think the point is back to what I was saying initially,
more capital, more new entrance, more transactions,
going down much deeper into the types of music catalogues
that are being refinanced,
using the term broadly, whatever the capital type is.
This is getting more sophisticated,
sometime a bit more technical in the structure.
People just need to be aware of that.
Just get a good advisor, essentially, is the message.
And then you'll enjoy the fullness of the capital
that is piling on to the industry.
I mean, there's one statistic I'll just give
because it's interesting.
In 2020, there were no securities issued
backed by music assets.
3.3 billion of those securities were issued in '24.
Last year in '25, it was 4.4 billion.
I just want people to realize the tidal wave
of almost of capital.
It's a great thing when capital believes
that your asset class is a good asset class,
just use it, just use it wisely.
So if we go back to the original prediction,
and we zoom out two, three years from now,
are there any signals that you think you would see
in the market that may make you think,
oh, we've got a little bit too far with this.
Buy or beware, yeah.
Well, we are seeing some sign of some,
and essentially in the dead market,
the key metric is going to be
what we call the LTV, the level of the loan
compared to the value of the assets you're lending.
Very, very, very broad strokes.
For a commercial bank, you're going to get something
like 50% of the appraised value of your catalog.
So your catalog is worth 100.
The bank is likely to be OK landing you 50.
A lot of factors come into determining that percentage.
The vintage, how granular your catalog is,
is the revenue concentrated on one title,
or is the disperser across the large number.
Lots of factors.
But essentially, 50%, 60% for the really good steady earner
is what you're going to get from it back.
At the upper end of the market,
the medzoning lender, as we call them,
they're going to go up to maybe 75% of that appraised value
of your catalog.
Again, broad strokes.
We are seeing some players in both areas
pushing the boat out a little bit.
That's a sign of a market that is getting a little frothy.
And it's OK, because the music asset has the characteristic
that it has.
It generates cash steadily.
You're getting paid very regularly
by people who actually use the music.
So there is a steady cash flow to service the debt.
You just need to be mindful of the fact that,
so long as the music, no pun intended, keeps playing,
the merry-go-round keeps going.
And that's fine, everything performs.
When the music stops, is when, potentially,
the issues that I was referring to earlier
could become a problem.
And so when a bank or when a medzlender
are really pushing those percentages,
advances against the appraised value of the catalog,
that's where potentially you're going to get in
an institution that could be uncomfortable.
We are starting to see some of those levels increasing.
And I think certainly we are very mindful of it,
and some asset can justify it absolutely.
So when you do want to bring that to party investor,
by any means, do it, but do it wisely.
Well, Guillaume, appreciate you coming on and sharing that.
And yeah, we'll definitely have to follow along.
And I look forward to seeing you at the summit.
Look forward to it as well.
Thanks for your time.
Thank you.
[MUSIC PLAYING]
And that is a wrap.
Thank you, again, to Guillaume, for joining us on this episode.
Thank you to our partners at Charmetric and Symphonic
for sponsoring this episode.
And thank you to G. Eric Abigail for everyone on our team
that helped make this trappable episode possible.
But most importantly, thank you for listening.
If there's one person you know that would really
get a lot out of trappable, whether it's
this episode or any others, send them
a link to the show.
Word amount is still the best way to grow.
And if you haven't already, leave a comment, leave a review.
That helps make sure that trappable reaches the right people.
And if you're not already subscribed, what are you doing?
Tap that follow button, tap that subscribe button,
and make sure you get the next trappable episode wherever
you listen to podcasts.
Have a great week.
Talk to you after the summit.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Guillaume Deschalandar, executive vice president of media and entertainment at Bank of California, predicts a significant influx of capital into the music asset class, driven by growing interest in leveraging music catalogs.
He warns that not all lenders are equal, especially private lenders, noting that some may take harsh actions—like foreclosure—if borrowers fail to repay, potentially stripping creators of their own work.
Regulated banks are more borrower-friendly and likely to work with borrowers to renegotiate terms, unlike newer or less experienced lenders who may lack understanding of music asset dynamics.
The music industry is seeing a surge in capital activity, with music-backed securities rising from zero in 2020 to $3.3 billion in 2024 and $4.4 billion in 2025, indicating a growing market maturity.
A key market signal of over-leveraging is when loan-to-value (LTV) ratios exceed 60–75% of catalog value, which may signal a frothy market and increased risk.
Borrowing allows creators to retain ownership while accessing capital, but success depends on the structure, partner, and long-term strategy, making professional advice essential.
The popularity of Katy Perry’s “The One That Got Away” on TikTok highlights how music trends and audience engagement can shift dramatically across platforms, challenging cultural perceptions.
The Trappital Summit in Hollywood brings together industry leaders to build relationships, foster innovation, and explore the next frontier of technology and music business models.
Summary:
Guillaume Deschalandar, from Bank of California, predicts a major surge in capital flowing into the music industry, driven by rising interest in leveraging music catalogs through borrowing and financing. While borrowing allows artists to retain ownership and control over their work, he cautions that not all lenders are trustworthy—especially private lenders who may take aggressive actions if repayments fail. He emphasizes the importance of choosing regulated financial partners and understanding loan structures, such as loan-to-value ratios, to avoid risks.
The market shows clear signs of growth, with music-backed securities jumping from zero in 2020 to over $4 billion in 2025. This trend signals deeper market sophistication but also potential over-leveraging, highlighted by rising LTV ratios beyond typical levels. The episode also features a cultural insight: Katy Perry’s 2011 song “The One That Got Away” is currently the top TikTok song of the summer, illustrating how algorithmic platforms can redefine music popularity despite critical skepticism.
Ultimately, the Trappital Summit serves as a pivotal event for industry leaders to network, explore innovation, and navigate the evolving landscape of music finance and technology. Success in this environment requires awareness, strategic planning, and expert guidance.
FAQs
Guillaume predicts a continued increase in capital influx into the music industry, particularly through borrowing against music catalogs, but warns that not all lenders are equal and that borrowers must be cautious about loan structures and lender behavior.
Regulated banks are more likely to work with borrowers to find solutions if repayment is difficult, while private lenders may take harsh actions, such as foreclosure, especially if loan terms are too aggressive or revenue expectations aren't met.
It means borrowers should be aware that high loan-to-value ratios and aggressive lending can lead to loss of control over their music catalogs if they fail to meet repayment obligations, especially with private lenders.
There was zero music-backed securities issued in 2020, but by 2024, $3.3 billion were issued, and by 2025, this jumped to $4.4 billion, indicating a significant and growing capital influx into the music asset class.
The LTV (Loan-to-Value) ratio compares the loan amount to the value of the music catalog. A higher ratio, especially above 60%, signals a potentially frothy market and could lead to financial risk if the catalog's revenue doesn't meet expectations.
A capital stack combines different types of financing—like senior debt, mezzanine debt, and equity—layered on top of each other to fund a music catalog, allowing for more flexibility based on the asset’s value and long-term goals.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.