Go back

BREAKING: Trump Hosts Ridiculous Press Conference with UFC CEO Dana White

17m 46s

BREAKING: Trump Hosts Ridiculous Press Conference with UFC CEO Dana White

Donald Trump’s impromptu press conference was marked by erratic, evasive, and often absurd responses, particularly regarding the alleged Chinese spy affair involving Jensen Wang. He repeatedly claimed ignorance of intelligence briefings, despite evidence suggesting he was briefed by Marco Rubio, creating a timeline inconsistency that undermines his credibility. The event also featured a predictable defense of his hardline immigration policies, rejecting any notion of amnesty despite prior media statements. Trump launched sharp personal attacks on journalists and media figures, using insults like "loser" and mocking CNN, which reflects a pattern of deflection rather than substantive engagement. A notable point was his absurd suggestion that Joe Biden or Trump would win a fight, underscoring a focus on theatrics over governance. The inclusion of Dana White as a potential press secretary was seen as a joke, highlighting Trump’s preference for entertainment over policy. The performance appears driven by a need for attention and self-validation rather than policy development, suggesting a continued reliance on outlandish narratives. Overall, the press conference reveals a consistent pattern of evasiveness, political bravado, and a lack of accountability—reinforcing the perception that Trump is reverting to a combative, attention-seeking style rather than engaging in measured political discourse.

Transcription

3423 Words, 18062 Characters

English
>> Hello, everybody, it's me Sam Stein. Man, you got the book. I'm here with my man Tim Miller. We're going to do a quick live reaction to Donald Trump's impromptu press conference. It's going to be quick, guys, because we both have places to be. But this was crazy enough that we felt like we had to do this. >> Tony is back. Is that out? >> That's it. >> Is this out? I mean, basically my assessment, I'm excited to go through the clips with you, is that he was kind of stunned, like a boxer who took a big punch to the noggin and had the birds flying around. And Trump spent, yeah, Trump spent kind of a week a little bit in a days over how bad he got his ass kicked. And even into 60 minutes, Ross, it wasn't full, it was subdued. It wasn't full Trump. And now he's gotten up off the mat. He's had a few full well-done burgers. And he was just out there today talking about election fraud, Colin Von Hilleard fake news, pretending like he could beat Joe Biden in a fight. Yeah, it's just to anybody who over the last 48 hours was like, maybe Trump will start doing some deals whenever it's like, no. >> No, no, no, no. >> Trump is back. Trump is trumping again. >> I wonder how much of this is like, how much of this is just self-medicating, right? They're like, oh, the White House is like, you know, you know what this guy really needs? He needs some outlandish press conference where he's the center of attention and saying, I write just things, that's going to get him back. Because that's what we got. So he comes out there to the press briefing room, brings Dana White, which is this whole stupid thing where Dana White may or may not be press secretary, and Dana White gets introduced, we can play the clip, let's play the clip. If we have it, this is what we do when we go live. >> Dana. >> No, we don't have it. So, it was Dana, Dana gets introduced and Trump say, you know, they're having a good laugh and yada yada. And then he's got to take questions. And the majority of it was about Jensen Wang, and what's going on with the obvious scandal that Jensen was having an affair with the Chinese spy. And they keep pressing him on whether or not he knew about it. And the evasiveness is almost surreal. So let's play Trump being evasive for one of three times when asked, when exactly you heard about Jensen Wang having a lover who was a Chinese spy? >> When you went to China earlier this year in May, did you know about these alleged ties with the Chinese spy then? >> No, I didn't hear about it then. But a lot of people have heard about it, and Jensen totally denies that. I asked him today, because I didn't speak to him today just to see if he's feeling all right, how you doing. And I asked him about that. And he said he had absolutely no idea that the person in question was a spy. >> All right, I asked him that question. Did you have any idea that she was a spy? I said, I had no idea that she was a spy. And I really believe him. Yeah. >> This one tickled me. This one was ridiculous. So his exoneration is that he was told by Jensen that this person never told Jensen that she was a spy. Was she supposed to say, hey, Jensen, I just want you to know, I'm actually a spy. Yeah. >> I think there are two elements to it. I guess we'll just on that part too. I mean, maybe Jensen is also an asset. That's what Steve Bannon is saying today. So as a public, he's not telling Trump that. >> As a public Jensen, it's just not telling Trump. And the whole thing is pretty strange about how excited Jensen was to give these high power chips to the Chinese. I mean, maybe it was, you know, just wonderful, you know, special something that he was getting from his mistress. Maybe it was just that. Maybe he was decmitized. That's what the kids are saying. It's possible that he was decmitized by the Chinese father. >> Is that a medical thing? >> But it's also possible that he's in on it. Anyway, more interesting to me is the timeline equivocation there. Because Trump is like, I hadn't heard about it, but other people had heard about it. >> Which means he is heard about it? >> What other people had heard about it? And what they have told you? Who are you talking? Who are the other people that you're talking about? I mean, it's according to all the reporting, he had to be briefed about it by Marco Rubio. >> Yeah. So he was asked directly about that eventually by Meredith McGraw at Wall Street Journal. He was like, just to put a fine point on this, can you say precisely when you were briefed by this? Because there is this intel report that you were handed by Marco Rubio. Did you see it? And he was like, well, you don't have to ask the intel people about that one. I'm not totally sure. But you're right. He kept saying other people had heard about it. So I'd heard about it. Which means he had heard about it. >> Yeah. It's a pretty big deal. I mean, like, the idea that the, you know, Chinese penetrate it, so to speak, the biggest chip company like in the country with like, you know, all the sensitive national security implications. It does feel like that is the type of thing that would have risen to the president of the United States. >> Really? And penetrator, are you going for the puns here? What's going on? >> Second one was an accident. >> Okay, well, well done. I'm very proud of you. Very short notice, and you're already rocking it. All right, so that was like most of it. That were the majority of the content. It was like, what? Did you know about Jensen and when? Again, Trump insisting that everything is kosher and bubboardy feels bad for the guy. But he's innocent because this woman never said she was a Chinese spy. So stupid, so stupid. All right, he was also asked about Amnesty. So this one was visible from a mile away. On 60 minutes last night, he was like, yeah, we were too tough on deportations in some respects. And we need to like give some legal status to the housekeepers and the lawn workers. And everyone freaked out. And so of course, he's asked about it today. And you could predict on to the letter what he had to say. But let's just play it anyway. >> You told 60 minutes that you felt that your deportation policy may have gone too far. But then you named the architect of that policy. >> Love that Dana's just sitting there. >> He's standing there. >> Chief of staff. Have you told him that you want changes to the deportation policy? >> No, we have a very strong deportation policy. There's no Amnesty, no anything. We keep that. But we focus on the worst of the worst. We want to get the murders out. We've got most of them out. We've got most of the really bad, you know, they allowed Joe Biden allowed 100, well, 25 million people to come in of that 11,888 murderers, most of whom committed more than one murder. We've gotten most of them. We want to get the worst of the worst. And then we'll see what happens. >> All right. I mean, this was so predictable. >> I just saying the same exact thing as he has been the whole time. And, you know, this is I think this is why I can already see the path of what's going to come the next two years because it's basically been what's happening the last couple of months, which is they continue to torment and terrorize migrants, asylum seekers, TPS people, you know, under the radar as much as possible. You know, at traffic stops, at check-ins, you know, at the ICE office, at the airport. And like, that's what they're going to continue to do. And, you know, unless there is real pressure put on the administration by Democrats and Congress, by the media, by activists, like that's how things are going to continue. And so I do think that like, to me, like, the reaction at 60 minutes, it was the idea that he's going to do a big deal. That's crazy. But like, the idea that you could go and start making demands, I think, based upon that is something that the Democrats should be doing. But I mean, what was never going to do a deal? And the whole thing is, what would that look like? It's preposterous. The idea that he would do a deal while Steven Miller was his chief of staff. It's like, comical. And all the freak out on the right was so stupid and superficial. I mean, I guess they earnestly mean it, but it was never going to happen. We got quick commercial break, but then when we come back, we're going to talk about the Pete Heggseth impeachment, which did come up in Trump. Like you said, classic old Donnie coming back with some, you know, little punches at the media. So we'll get to that, too, but quickly a commercial break. This message is brought to you by Quince. So the best pieces in your closet are the ones that you can reach for again, and again, and again, whether you're just getting dressed for work or heading out for the night or just keeping things casual. That's why I love Quince. Their shirts, in particular, are some of my favorites because they're so versatile. I can throw them on, style it a million different ways, and I know I will look put together without having to think twice. They're the kind of wardrobe staples that make getting dressed effortless. And with the holidays right around the corner, well, Quince makes shopping for everyone on your list, just frankly, really easy. It's where I'm turning to for gifts for friends and family, as well as things for myself. Quince is all about high quality essentials made with premium materials like 100% Mongolian cashmere, 14 karat gold, and Italian leather. They offer timeless pieces that feel luxurious without the luxury price tag, and pieces that you'll reach for long after the holiday season is over. Their cashmere sweater started just $60. That's such a steal. And there's so much to choose from, from premium down jackets, and we'll out of work to cozy cashmere accessories. Quince has everything you need to stay warm, look great, and feel put together all season long. So I just got that cashmere sweater and it is absolutely perfect. It's been great for the fall. Honestly, wear it on TV. People think I look good, wear it to the office, people think I look casual, it's perfect. Give the gift of quality, this holiday season, download the Quince app for app exclusive offers or go to quince.com. Get free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. It's now available in Canada and the UK too. And when Quince asks you where you heard about them, let them know it was bull work takes. It's the best way to sport this show. All right, jumping right back into it. The Trump press by a couple of reporters and just lash out against them. You mentioned Vaughn Hilliard. He did the whole MSDNC, not MSNOW. You guys are a failure or a loser. But the real one was a fool. Just really quick on Vaughn if I could just say, because what Vaughn was pressing in Vaughn was the fact that Trump continues to give Vladimir Putin deadlines, you know, say, oh, you have to have a ceasefire by this amount of time you have to meet with Zelensky by this amount of time. And Putin never follows through on the deadlines. And Trump never follows through on the threats. You know, and it's just a classic no enforcement of the red line. And now as we come this week and Jared Kushner is talking about how, you know, there's a new trial adder on the table that he's excited about, and it's similar to the immigration thing. But with Putin and the Stephen Miller chair here, which is like, you know, the chief of staff of the war is Putin. And until Trump, you know, wants to actually do something different, there's no reasonably, there will be anything different. So anyway, Trump did not engage on the fact that he has been pushed over by Putin over and over again, and instead, you know, made fun of late fun of Vance ratings. That was pretty good. Yeah, his rings are great. And he also made fun of CNN as usual, uh, sparring partner, I suppose, although she doesn't really spy. He's just asked good questions, Caitlin Collins. Let's play that clip. Go ahead, please give in to our stand by so even if he's in peace, you're going to press him on here. You went towards, he was in charge. We all won. I had great people. You what? Massey says that he's carried out. Massey's a loser, just like you're a loser at CNN, just like your ratings are a loser. Massey is a loser. Stone called loser. I ran. I did something that nobody's done. I took on a guy that was in his own way, sort of popular in the state. And well, Trump's a loser actually just a quick update, a huge loser, uh, some of the biggest midterm loser since 1974. So just while we're discussing losers, uh, I, you know, the, the, the, the heck something is interesting. Bill and I talked about this a bit on the show and, um, you know, you don't put a past Trump kind of circle the ligands around somebody option to the last second, 20, you know, decides to fire him via bleed. But, um, I, I'm not totally convinced the Trump is going to throw a headset overboard. I, I think that it's tough for him to find a headset replacement and, um, I don't know. Uh, we'll see. I think it just depends on potential that he feels like there's somebody else that could do the job that be loyal to him and, I think you're in success. You're in success. Right. The reason he probably won't is because of the impeachment. I think because he's being asked to or pushed to or demanded to buy Democrats and massie, he's just going to, he'll never give in to that. Yeah. And Trump's been impeached twice. Why would he give credence to a Democrat? Why would he give credence to another impeachment when he said that these are fake and gay, you know? Right. So I, I think, you know, in a perverse way, they should do it. They should absolutely do it. Don't get me wrong. But, um, this will probably, uh, secure headset standing with Trump. I will note that at another point, um, they, he was asked about the impeachment efforts against Hexeth. And the quote, I believe was, what about impeaching the people that ran the Vietnam war? What about impeaching the people that ran Iraq and Afghanistan, all those other wars, um, those wars are not currently ongoing and we can't impeach those people. So, um, few other little points before I got to run midterms, were they rigged? Trump. Well, I think the numbers were terrible in terms of those early votes. He then went on a big, uh, speech about the two Dan Sullivan's and how Alaska had to be rigged and how all the votes for, uh, anyone, uh, other than the real Dan Sullivan should go to the real Dan Sullivan. So he believes that's rigged. What do you make of that? Very half-hearted. Yeah. That's right. The elections are rigged. Stuff has been very half-hearted. He's like, Oh, the early vote felt like there was a lot of early vote. Even still though, it is a difference going back to like my main takeaway this, uh, from this from the beginning. Is he is like reverting to it, baby, baby, baby, it Trump, you know? Yeah. And now he's just going to put back to playing the hit. Yeah. Maybe Trump, maybe he's reverting to fat Elvis Trump, whatever it is. Where's like the CAA operators and the Venezuelan computer hackers and the Italian spies? Like, that's the good stuff. This is just. Yeah. It's not whimsy. Yeah. There's no romance. Where's the, it's like, uh, Jensen's lover is, you got to tell us that it's your spy. Uh, all right. Uh, messy blah, blah, blah. We covered that. I guess the last thing is then, uh, Dana White. So we do have a clip with Dana White. At the end, Dana's in there and Trump does this whole spectacle about offering him the press secretary job. And this is what happens. Wait, wait. Wait, wait. So let me ask you the big question, Dana, would you like to be press secretary of the United States of America? Look at us. I didn't have this behind you all the time. The White House question. Would you like that? Did you just want to stay with this ridiculous UFC? Huh? Thank you for the officer, uh, for the honor I have, though, no, no, I don't not want to be in politics now. I am devastated to hear this goodbye. Everybody. All right. There's one more Dana clip. We do have to play. We do have it. The one from the very beginning, um, because I think this really represents the make a wish presidency at its peak form. All right. Yes. I have a question. I think there was a pound for pounds. You have to see a cage. Not between President Trump and former president Joe Biden. Same age. Same way. And considering what styles make fights, could you give us an analysis of who? The toughest Brazilian human being that I've ever met in my entire life, many times during, you know, the last eight, ten years, whatever it's been, I have told them, why, why do you keep doing this? Why are you doing this? I was going through everything that he went through. And I mean, tough in his real, as resilient as I thought he was after, uh, he got shot. I, uh, yeah, I, he's, he is a one of one unique human being. And, uh, Dana struggling with would Joe Biden or Donald Trump have won a, win in a fight. And I don't think that's a great sign for a future as press secretary. Uh, no, I had, I got to shout out my guy, Max Steele at every town who had the best post about this. By far, the most likely explanation is Steven Miller told Trump the next press secretary needed to have the DNA of a light, but Trump was only half-listening in her DNA. That's pretty good, but, uh, yeah, I mean, it's just really sad, I mean, it's like who would win in a fight? And who is that? He was asking. Oh, well, whatever somebody from Newsmax or some shit, who I think we think it's Lindell TV. Lindell TV Joe Biden or Trump is like a guy, buddy, well, just old. All right. I got to run. This was fun. Thank you, Kim for doing this. We're watching, sorry for a short version, but we got lives to live and shit to do. We do. I'm going to ladies' weights class. That I could make sure that I could win in a fight against Joe Biden and Emma Mayfight Lindell TV. Ask me. Good night. Good night. All right. Everyone subscribe to the feed. We'll talk to you later.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. Donald Trump returned to public scrutiny with an impromptu press conference, displaying a defiant and outlandish demeanor reminiscent of his earlier, more aggressive style.
  2. Trump was notably evasive when questioned about alleged ties between Jensen Wang and a Chinese spy, repeatedly claiming he didn’t know about it while asserting others had heard, creating a timeline contradiction.
  3. The discussion highlighted inconsistencies in Trump’s claims—such as denying awareness of intelligence briefings from Marco Rubio—suggesting a pattern of selectivity and denial rather than factual clarity.
  4. Trump downplayed immigration policy changes, reaffirming a hardline stance on deportations and rejecting any notion of amnesty, despite prior comments suggesting a relaxation of enforcement.
  5. Trump made sharp, dismissive remarks at media figures, including mocking CNN and its reporters, while using insults about "losers" and "ratings" to deflect criticism.
  6. The press conference included a satirical suggestion that Joe Biden or Trump would win a fight, reflecting a lack of seriousness about governance and policy.
  7. Trump’s suggestion to offer Dana White the position of press secretary was widely seen as absurd and symbolic of his preference for spectacle over substance.
  8. The overall tone indicates a strategy of self-medication through attention-grabbing performances, reinforcing a political persona rooted in chaos and unpredictability.

Summary:

Donald Trump’s impromptu press conference was marked by erratic, evasive, and often absurd responses, particularly regarding the alleged Chinese spy affair involving Jensen Wang. He repeatedly claimed ignorance of intelligence briefings, despite evidence suggesting he was briefed by Marco Rubio, creating a timeline inconsistency that undermines his credibility. The event also featured a predictable defense of his hardline immigration policies, rejecting any notion of amnesty despite prior media statements.

Trump launched sharp personal attacks on journalists and media figures, using insults like "loser" and mocking CNN, which reflects a pattern of deflection rather than substantive engagement. A notable point was his absurd suggestion that Joe Biden or Trump would win a fight, underscoring a focus on theatrics over governance. The inclusion of Dana White as a potential press secretary was seen as a joke, highlighting Trump’s preference for entertainment over policy.

The performance appears driven by a need for attention and self-validation rather than policy development, suggesting a continued reliance on outlandish narratives. Overall, the press conference reveals a consistent pattern of evasiveness, political bravado, and a lack of accountability—reinforcing the perception that Trump is reverting to a combative, attention-seeking style rather than engaging in measured political discourse.

FAQs

The main topics were allegations of election fraud, the so-called affair between Jensen Wang and a Chinese spy, and his deportation policy, with much of the content being evasive and inconsistent.

Trump claimed he didn’t hear about the allegations until later, but he admitted others had heard about it, creating a timeline contradiction. His responses suggested a lack of clarity and consistency, indicating evasion.

Yes, he referenced a perceived overreach in deportation policies and claimed there would be no amnesty, emphasizing a focus on 'the worst of the worst' offenders.

He claimed it was not possible to impeach those officials because the wars are no longer ongoing, showing a refusal to address past accountability in a serious way.

Yes, he stated that early voting numbers suggested the election was rigged, particularly in Alaska, and claimed that votes for anyone other than Dan Sullivan should have been invalidated.

The introduction and Trump's offer to Dana White highlighted a lack of serious political credibility, using humor and absurdity to deflect from substantive governance issues.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.