Go back

BREAKING: Homeland Security Raids Ilhan Omar's House - Criminal Investigation Confirmed

1h 2m

BREAKING: Homeland Security Raids Ilhan Omar's House - Criminal Investigation Confirmed

The transcript presents a politically charged and culturally critical commentary that examines several interconnected themes. It opens with allegations of immigration fraud against Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, citing a federal raid on her home and questioning whether such actions are politically motivated or legally justified. The host argues that this investigation, while framed as serious, may be part of broader "lawfare" tactics near election time. A major counterpoint is the claim that Democrats, not Republicans, are overwhelmingly funded in politics—specifically highlighting Act Blue’s massive spending, which dwarfs Republican contributions. The discussion then shifts to cultural issues around consent, rape, and gender dynamics, with the host challenging feminist narratives that equate attraction to younger women with predation. The analysis includes a detailed critique of the "fawning" response post-rape, asserting that continued relationships after sexual violence do not negate the act of rape. The show also examines real-world cases, such as Jane Doe at Cornell and Ashley Sinclair’s relationship with Elon Musk, to argue that accusations are often used as tools of social control rather than based on evidence. Throughout, the host maintains that political and cultural narratives are being manipulated to suppress free speech, create moral panic, and blame women for societal issues. The tone is confrontational, blending factual claims with strong ideological assertions, ultimately aiming to expose what it sees as systemic misinformation and cultural distortion in mainstream discourse.

Transcription

10762 Words, 58359 Characters

English
don't worry joe i'm not going to bring it up and never it's not a shallow grave so you it's fine in the vault yeah you're good uh welcome to the lineup live here on rumble each show rolls into the next you've come in from dan bongino and then you go to hayley caronia or you continue with us because you're a member of rumble premium otherwise you're a freeloader and we still welcome you but eventually we would welcome your support we have both policy politics and culture today policy politics ilan omar don't say brother screw her though she is so the dhs raided her house for immigration fraud the funny thing is we have to ask well which one the the immigration fraud that she committed to get here the immigration fraud that she committed marrying her brother so that he could get here uh and then that is going to bring us into another policy i guess it's not really another myth but it is a myth have you seen the chart with the mega donors all the billionaires giving to republicans this is the oligarchy oh my gosh um it's not really another myth but it is a myth have you seen the chart with the mega donors all the billionaires giving to republicans this is the oligarchy oh my gosh um it's not really another it's not really another myth but it is a myth have you seen the chart with the mega donors all the not only misleading it's flat out dishonest it's basically a guest list of 20 people and it includes no other donations democrats outspend republicans uh by a significant degree they have an all major recent elections and they have been doing so this election too if anyone tells you otherwise they're lying then we need to get into culture call me daddy hey they had a guest uh letting you know that no matter what you do as a man it is rape and no matter what a woman does including dating marrying her rapist after the rape uh it is still rape also uh you shouldn't find women who are younger than you attractive whatsoever because that too is rape which will bring us to the new news about that dj uh john summits because people say he's a rapist since he wanted an attractive woman of age at his show let me ask you what's your definition of rape are you an are you a traditionalist like i am where it's you know rape on with the show *Train noise* *Horror music* They're here! What? Who? It's the undead. *Horror music* Not today, poltergeist. *Horror music* Horror movies just don't work with the Second Amendment. *Horror music* Click Rumble Premium and join now for $99 annually or $999 a month to get the entirely ad-free experience and an ever-expanding roster of content, creators, and free speech. We'll be right back. *Snoring* I forgot. Happy Indigenous Peoples Day. *Crying* No, no, no, no. No, what are you talking about? It's Columbus Day. Come on. I mean. I mean, you guys know people say he committed genocide. He didn't. The Native Americans didn't domesticate animals. They didn't practice animal husbandry, so they were wiped out by diseases. The idea that he was a rapist. Nah, he told his men to stay away from Native American women and the idea that Native Americans were peaceful. You'll hear all this today. It's not true. Ask them about cannibalism, scalping or hunting the buffalo by chasing an entire herd off a cliff so that they could eat one pre-modern refrigeration. So we're not going to play that game. Captain Morgan, CEO, how are you? Holy sh*t. *Laughter* Fantastic. How are you? I'm good. I'm actually a little angry. I don't know. I just lied. I don't know why I lied. I'm not. Because you listen to the whole Call Her Daddy podcast. Every. Every week you listen. One hour and 15 minutes of it. It is really, really bad. And it's not just, "Oh, look, this is rage bait." It's. There are many, many young women who are going to take this advice. A lot. We are now dealing with that generationally, so that's what we do. We listen, we watch these shows so that you don't have to, and then we come to you and we are bearers of horrible news. We bring you tidings of terror. Weekdays, 11 a.m. Eastern, and Friday, October 23rd at Winter's Club. Mmm, winter, please. Pasadena, Texas. How are you, sir? Josh Farley. I'm doing pretty good, because my laptop stopped putting audio out. Really? Yeah, today. Remember, I was like, "Do we need to get you a new one?" And you said, "No, no, no, no." Yeah, I said, "No, it's fine." But the audio went out today, so I didn't hear any of that Call Her Daddy stuff. Okay. I just watched it and I was like, "I'm pretty sure I know what they're saying." Yeah, yeah, and you're right. I think I nailed it. When you talked to me about it, I thought you were quoting it. So you're like Beethoven. No, dude, no, I just kind of got it. You just put your ear to the table and went, "Whores!" Yeah, since Columbus Day, I channeled my inner Elizabeth Warren. Yeah, exactly. Hi, yeah, yeah, yeah. I hear them coming. Yeah, yeah. 1-1000-47-whatever-it-is. How about that, guys? Get the lead paint! All right, Windex. Speaking of silly, here's a—I was going to say, like, when I— I was about to say this colorful woman, meaning someone with pizazz, personality, but I really should say woman of color because she's black. So let's just play it safe and say colored lady. She decided to perform an exorcism on a cotton field because she has never seen one before, which tells you how far removed she is from slavery. It's not going to stop her. Watch out for that necklace. It's like the hula hoop for the neck. Lindsay Clancy is salivating. Watch, she looks around, and then when cars come by, she performatively cries and yells more. I think it hurts her neck, that's probably why. This is like my kid, but worse. Hey, Dad, look at this. Yeah. Thanks. Now watch. You heard a car drive by, she's like, "Aah!" I am free! Blabberjacket. Well, of course you're free, you're wearing New Balance. I am free! Look at her outfit. Hey, Gerald's cursor's not your costume. You tired yet? No. Period, motherfuckers. I don't think she's so much free as she is winded. Is she on her period, is that why she's doing that, she's trying to air out the area? Well, joke's on her, that was a field of corn. Y'all didn't do a lot of corn picking, did you? Children of the corn, one of us, idiot, one of us. Now, what she didn't anticipate, and actually, we have the exclusive because she was, you just heard the audio from her camera, we actually have the omnidirectional lav microphone and the drive-bys that she had to deal with. i am 12 years a slave more like 43 years yeah you're free to shut the up there we hear you feel free to tell the pricks later at waffle house which spirit are you channeling the fucking airline makes it so much better i love it i think i remember that was my pilot on spirit airlines we landed she was also the propeller cleansing the plane it's just here's how you know it's so performative when when slaves obviously were fighting to be free they're probably like now now keep your head down don't make a big show about it do the right thing now she's just like oh wait i have dealt with no oppression my whole life let me put on a rainbow suit new balance and swing around a giant comically large marty gaw marty grob necklace yeah and scream out i am free sure this is this is actually a perfect encapsulation like i'm free well yeah i know i racism is dead uh-huh what what are we doing here why are you yelling at what are you yelling at me for oh oh you want the social clout now take that and apply that mindset that insanity to admissions you have a lot of time to do that so i'm going to show you affirmative action apply it to fortune 500 companies you have dei imagine that woman being in charge of your engineering department imagine if she was in charge instead of gerald yeah exactly right gosh we would never do all those sketches no we would not and also we i don't think so also we'd all be working for free because we are free you are free yes you are free need to change you want to see steven i tell you well i tell you who's uh who's probably not free who's probably going to be fitted for a um you know hopefully probably going to be fitted for a um you know pirate themed uh orange jumpsuit ilan omar multiple uh time committer of immigration fraud allegedly of course uh known primarily for marrying and or allegedly banging her brother her house in dc was raided good morning I was told this happened a little bit shortly after 6 o'clock this morning here at Congresswoman Omar's home in Washington, D.C. It's unclear if she's home at this time. We don't have details, guys, specifically about what the investigation entails. But we can report that it is a federal criminal investigation. I want to read a statement from a DOJ spokesperson. It says, quote, Today in the Washington, D.C. area, Homeland Security Investigations executed a judicially authorized search warrant secured by the Department of Justice. This enforcement action is part of an ongoing federal criminal investigation. Hmm. Yeah. Yeah. As it should be. You know, people going, this is this is lawfare from this administration. Remember, Donald Trump had to deal with a judge saying that he committed fraud for valuating a piece of property, Mar-a-Lago, which was clearly worth it. At least quadruple more than the judge declared it to be. And we showed you the comps nearby. This lady committed immigration fraud and then very likely committed it again by allegedly marrying her brother. That's not just something we say. We've shown you the marriage certificate. Also, about a month ago, Tom Holman, MVP of this administration, confirmed that Omar was being investigated. And he reaffirmed it this morning in a way that Tom Holman only he can. If someone committed immigration violation, someone committed marital. Fraud or anything like that, regardless if they're a congressman or not, no one's above the law. So I'll leave it at that. We'll let the HSI Homeland Security Investigations continue the investigation. OK, so you're confirming that there is an investigation into Congresswoman Omar. I'm confirming that ISIS. Yeah, I'd look. I said something that's been reported and needs to be looked at. OK, here's the thing. With with Tom Holman and we've had him on the show. Don't ask him a question he's already answered. It's just one of those things like, well, we're. Yeah, I know. I already ended it like a couple of months ago. I just answered it again. But I get it. You're under it. You're actually stop asking me. Yes. Yes. It's enough. But here he is again answering. I didn't have this to run through, I guess. Confirming double, triple, quadruple secret. Confirming federal agents raided Congresswoman Ilhan Omar's home in Washington, D.C. She was reportedly being investigated. Over her immigrant immigration paperwork. Can you tell us anything about this raid? So I can confirm that a search warrant was executed this morning, signed by a judge. Department of Justice is leading the investigation, along with Department Homeland Security. So there is an investigation. A warrant was served. Again, he's not the kind of guy is going to give you in for like, hey, can you give us a scoop? No, I'm not going to give you a scoop. I'm not going to be. Chocolate chip cookie dough. Do you mind giving Ilhan Omar an opportunity to get out of whatever she's suspected of? Right. Exactly right. No, I don't think. And just like CNN, they were shocked that people might think that Joe Biden was suffering from cognitive decline, you know, until Jake Tapper. Right. He wrote a whole book about it and then decided to monetize it. How did he miss it? CNN right now is just. It's like they haven't watched what we've shown you or they haven't really been following all of the paperwork. They were just dumbfounded. They were perplexed. How could this happen? That being so close to an election. And there are generally speaking, we've seen this discussed and very much highlighted in terms of past investigations and what what does or should happen within a certain number of days of an election. What is the Justice Department saying about this? Right. Well, Kate, there's a longstanding policy at the Department of Justice. It's not a hard and fast rule, but it is a policy that the Department of Justice needs to take a lot of precautions in the 60 days. Take October off. Before an election. We are well into that. We are not even a month away. And there is early voting happening across the country at this time for this election. Primary season is largely over. It is unusual for the Justice Department to make such a what they would call an overt investigative step. Yeah. So they got to be careful of potentially investigating or prosecuting a crime because that might interfere with people voting for the criminal. How would they know that? It's not like they did it. Yeah. It sounds like they tried to impeach him at every single chance. And by the way, jailed his house, political dissidents. Now, if Omar, if Omar lied to get citizenship, she can lose her citizenship. She could also be convicted of a crime. Also, the fact that she potentially and by this, I mean, she absolutely did marry her brother. We know that. Now, was it for immigration fraud? Who knows? But that's why we've been on this for a very long time. And we wrote a whole song about it. If you haven't seen it, here's a clip. And then we'll put the link in the description. Omar married her own biological brother. I wish this was a joke. But I'm completely serious here. And will you tell all your friends Omar married her sibling? This song was super necessary. Probably wasn't on your bingo card. Taking about Sunday parody for Ilhan Omar fornicating with her brother. But we did it. She did it for love. Love of the game. That's her brother's name is game. And just to give you an idea. I mean, this is how she is not determined by some algorithm. The chances of Ilhan Omar being charged with a federal crime this year is 45%. So that's it. That's a pickup. Awesome. Because everyone knows that she's done it. It's just a matter of can they make it stick? Yes. And by the way, we've known this for a very long time. How fast does CNN think these cases get adjudicated? Like, do you think 60 days? Is enough time? If they've done this in May, it would still be ongoing. It would be hanging over the election. I'm ready for them to do it whenever. Maybe they just now had all the evidence lined up and they're like, you know what? We got it. We're going in. I love it. And this is the thing when people complain and say, I haven't seen enough perp walks. Well, sure. But they're by God, they're trying. They keep getting blocked by lower courts. I mean, the lawfare that's taking place right now. That's where your ire should be aimed. It's unbelievable. It's unprecedented. We've never seen anything like it. This lady should be nowhere near off. She should be nowhere near American soil. Period. Let alone office. So it is an election and some people who also commit fraud may want to vote for the lady who committed fraud. I don't care, Harold. All right, let's go on to this next one. Close to my name. Let me ask you this. What do you think is an appropriate age gap in the dating world? What do you think constitutes creepy? Because we were the people, obviously, who created the quote unquote most offensive ad ever for a foundation where it was a fictional tale of people hunting sex offenders, pedophiles. Which, of course, would never happen. It was a good story. Yeah. But now the left just and I should say the feminist left. They want to paint everything with the pedophile brush, including men who are in their 30s, dating women in their early 20s or men in their late 20s, dating girls who are 18 or 19. At what point do you just say, you know what? That's not something I would do, but I understand it versus this person is clearly a predator because this brings us to the story right now. John Summit, who I guess is a very popular DJ. Was I guess he was he was assaulted verbally online for direct messaging college girls and invited them to his shows. So as far as we know, he's not even sleeping with these girls. He's asking them to go to his shows because he wants attractive women at his show. This person responded, hey, John Summit, you should probably quit DMing college freshmen. Now, again, he's 32. One of the women was 18 in question, and he responded, I like adding hot women to my guest list to make sure the party is better. Sue me. Now, just I just want to be clear. Should 18 year old women be allowed to vote? Do 18 year old women, 19 year old, 20 year old women, do they have bodily autonomy? Is it their body, their choice? Are they allowed to say yes or refuse an invitation to a really cool DJ party that they clearly already want to attend? Please let me know the rules so we understand them and can ignore them going forward. What are they saying? Are they saying that women are incapable of making a sound decision? Right. Are they saying that women are incapable of fighting off a predator that just some guy who's 30 and perverted is just that's too much? Yeah. Just like, hey, you want free tickets to a show because you're pretty and it helps that there are pretty people. Oh, you mean like they've done at nightclubs forever? Also, if recent news is to be believed, if he rescinds the invitation now, that means that he raped her. Exactly. That's exactly right. Because all of it is is rape, as other people say on YouTube. Great. But we don't say that. We just say the word because we're adults and we assume that you can hear them as well. So, of course, all of the feminists and their their awful LGBTQ, A.I. P in a silent number five lesbian chain gang, they went after the DJ as a creep. Right. Which they do with whether it's Tobey Maguire, Leonardo DiCaprio, anyone who's basically 30 or older, dating a 20 something year old. And here's the thing. I get it in the sense that if you're a 50 year old and you're dating exclusively 18 year olds. All right. I think it's weird. Or it wouldn't be for me. But there's nothing perverted about it. And they just keep changing. If you agree. If you agree to the new social norms from the feminist left, they're just going to change the age. Yeah, they're going to change it from 18 to 20, from 20 to 22, 22 to 24, to the point where it's really just any age that is slightly younger than theirs. And, you know, the real problem with this, it's denying reality. It's denying biology. Let me paint this picture for you before I get to the studies. For how many, let's say, 20 year old woman, for how many 20 year old women do you think would be a disqualifier if a good looking, in shape, charming, successful woman was a successful 40 year old asked them out? The answer is almost none, virtually none. Virtually, I'm not talking about some 50 year old creep I'm talking about, take a, I don't Timothy Olyphant was like, I use him as an example because he was gray-haired since he was 30. He goes like, hey, would you like to go get some coffee? It's attractive to most women. Now, let's flip it. To how many men, just on a physical basis, physical attraction, do you think it would be a disqualifier if a woman was 20 or 22? The answer is none. Women, this is study after study, shows us this is denying the natural. It's convincing women and men to deny what they tend to naturally desire. And there's a very, very wide spectrum, to be clear, in order to demand that you find other things beautiful, you know, like fat pride, you know, like gender fluidity. Studies keep showing us time and time again. Check the references. We make them available every single show. Men prefer generally younger mates who are attractive in their window of fertility. Women generally prefer older men with financial prospects. This is how it's gone for a long time, to varying degrees. Just to be clear, these feminists on the left, who are absolutely lambasting this guy, this DJ, they want you, they demand that you declare this beautiful. All bodies are beautiful. Why are you discriminatory? Also, by the way, trans women, women with penises, it's discriminatory if you don't find them beautiful. But they get mad if you actually prefer this. To help her with the electricity and the plumbing. Exactly. Everything seems to be out of whack. Yeah, she's like, oh, I got my jeans on. I'm going to go find a man and fix it. I got my jeans. So everything's all set. No, it's not. You're going to have water damage. There's a risk of mold. And that first girl was the definition of making the cover. Yeah. She made the whole cover. She's on the whole cover of the magazine. She was on the whole cover. It was a mad fold-out. They couldn't even put words anywhere. Cover maxing. But this is what, so now it's women go after, say, that's creepy. Why do you find her attractive? Well, she's 24. Yeah, but you saw her when she was really young. So? So? Yeah. What does that mean? Drew Barrymore I saw when she was really young, too. Yeah. And now I still think her sideways mouth thing's kind of cute. Yeah, you know, Olsen twins. They were at one point really, not that I find them too attractive. Nah, they never blossomed. Nah, they never lived to their full potential. I'm trying to think of who else was. Hey, remember Friends? These were all the sex symbols, right? They were in their 20s when the show started. Topanga's? Early on. Still smoking, dude. They want you, a man, to feel guilty. If you go, I prefer that to the fat pride. Well, that's creepy because you're just, just like they always do this, if you comb your hair, if you brush your beard, right, if you groom, they go, well, you're a metrosexual. What they want you to believe is you're just one degree away from being gay. Like Clark Gable or Clint Eastwood or, you know, all men have tried to keep up their appearances within reason. And now they want you to believe that if you find a 24-year-old, a 22-year-old, a 20-year-old, if you find a younger woman. If you find a younger woman physically attractive, which is how we are biologically hardwired as far as attraction, they want you to believe that you're one degree of separation away from pedophilia. It couldn't be further from the truth. These are the same people, too, that'll celebrate Miley Cyrus' sexual liberation. Right. Showing her vagina and her nipples to anybody who will look. Yeah. Hoping her dad sees it or whatever. I don't know. But she was Hannah Montana. Now, all of a sudden, her vagina's all over the internet. Yep. And it's like, yeah, that's, that's liberation. They go, sex work is real. Real work. You're probably a creep on OnlyFans. Well, guess what? If there weren't those creeps, there'd be no sex work. And I think all of it is bad. I don't think that 30, 20, 40-year-olds being attracted to each other within reason, I don't think it's bad. I think that's how the human race has populated the earth. And we need more of them. We need to pump those numbers up. I'll be honest. A lot of these women out there, they're just six malad, as my grandfather would say in the head, and they could use some group therapy. There I was, laying in a puddle of my own filth. I got a cat licking my anus inside my rental. And that's, that's what I knew. I knew that I needed something better. We've all been there. But just remember this. It's always darkest right before the dawn. I know. I just, I need to make better choices. Well, it's the first day of the rest of your life, bud. Got plenty of time for that. Nick, I noticed you haven't said anything in a while. Anything you'd like to share with the group? Yeah. Yeah, I'm actually in a really good place. Since our last meeting, it's like my life's done a complete 180. Yeah? How so? I found a new plug. No, that's, that's not what this is about. You don't move from one thing to another. That's not helping. No, no, it is. It really is. Tell us. How is it helping you? Well, they gave me a great deal. And they helped me regain control. That's not control, though, Nick. It's not control if you're letting something else take over. You can't place one with the other. That's not how it works. It's not like that at all. It's like I'm saving over $800 a month. Think about it. That's like an extra $10,000 raise a year. Look, that's certainly an interesting way to look at it. Yeah, I mean, there's no upfront cost. There's no hidden fees. And it's salary-based, so they're not going to push you into a deal that doesn't make sense for you. I think you actually might be onto something. Who's your guy? Oh, it's not a guy. It's the whole team at American Financing. Well, thanks for sharing that with us. No problem. Yeah, now what do you guys say we go to his new house and do some drugs? Yes, let's do some drugs! Let's get messed up. Up top, baby. Nah, just kidding, dude. Screw you. I'm out of here. I'm going to go to your house and do some drugs. Call American Financing. American Financing is helping homeowners save an average of $800 a month. And there are no upfront fees to see how much you can save. And if you sign up today, you may even delay two mortgage payments. Call 1-800-974-6500 today. Or go to AmericanFinancing.net slash crowdfunding. Proud. They took my keys. I just got the carpet clean. I hate that. Maybe he's roommates with that Sadie in the soap coming out of the. It'll just clean it. He wishes. Yeah, that would be nice. Sadie Sink, is that her name? Sadie Sink, yeah. More like Sadie needs to fix her sink. Hey, boom. Take that, you dumb broad. I'm proud of you. I don't know why. We just did the Simpsons voices. Where they're kind of doing Charles Bronson. Yeah. Which, that would have been better, actually. Charles Bronson talking to that lady. Like, hey, you punk. Why are you talking about being free instead of getting a job? What? All right. She's a fitness influencer. What are you, some kind of DJ? You fancy yourself? Put on some mouse ears? Play a record? Call yourself a musician? Zip face. All right. Oh, boy. Thank you for the raid. Dan, we appreciate it. Welcome, all viewers. We're about to get to something here. Pretty important, because sometimes when things just appear enough on social media or legacy media, well, that means it's true. Must be true. But very often, it's not. So, you've heard this quite a bit. And this is what happens when the left isn't doing as well as they thought they would. Like, remember Kamala Harris? And they talked about the donors to Donald Trump. Like, you've been outspending all. The only reason you're the nominee is so that you can still have the coffers of Joe Biden and he's a demented old circus monkey. So, right now, what you're hearing is, well, big money in politics. And it's, by the way, rich dudes. Like, Elon, it's the billionaire oligarchs. And it's all on the Republican side. Guys, that's why you have to vote left. Nine out of the top ten individuals and families contributing money to this year's midterm elections are Republican-aligned donors. For every dollar contributed by donors in the top ten, 86 cents comes from a billionaire backing a Republican. A 28% increase from 2022. When you have billionaires and major corporations at the head of a Lego character spending hundreds of millions of dollars trying to elect specific individuals that they really have an outsized, much larger and louder voice in our democracy than everyone else. Political spending could reach $11.6 billion in 2026, setting a new record and even surpassing previous presidential election years. So, are billionaires buying elections exclusively for Republicans? It's time for Claim Truth. This one's really pretty simple. The claim, and here's the meme that you'll see that's also really popular, that Republican megadonors are outspending Democrats nearly four to one. Bring up the graphic. It shows 830 million and Democrats only 220. That's like three, four. It could be 20 times more. Look at all the red on that graph. Red is bad. Stop, red. Here's the truth. That's just a carefully curated guest list. They just chose people and set a threshold. In total, Democrats have outspent Republicans $2.65 billion to $1.85. $2.65 billion to $1.85. Act Blue alone dumped $1.9.5 billion into this election. Dude, that's more than Republicans combined. Yes, more than Republicans combined. Just Act Blue. By the end of this, it'll probably be over $2 billion. So the left goes, big money in politics. Big money in politics. Here's the thing. Act Blue has been around for a very, very long time. You need to know that. It's probably one of the most politically influential groups out there. They do a lot in between elections. $1.93 billion. The closest thing that you have is WinRed. is about $750 million. So significantly less than half. Jeez. And so then they go to the billionaires. And here's something you need to know. This is what we talked about when people look at fascists like Pinochet, or they look at a reaction historically, they don't actually look at what necessitated that. Elon Musk saw elections being stolen by giant money in politics, like Act Blue, while the left claimed that they were the little guy. People like him were actually inspired to step up. Before that, by the way, billionaires overwhelmingly donated to Democrats until the tides shifted just a little bit. Here's the truth. Another one. Mega donors only account for about an eighth of the total $9.8 billion raised as far as political spending. Nine. Here's another truth. Nine of the top 10 spending candidates are Democrats. As far as the candidates, the lone Republican in the top 10 is for Lindsey Graham's seat to hold it after his sudden death. And all these other huge high profile, race is nine out of the top 10, top 10 spending candidates are Democrats. Act Blue alone has given more in this election cycle than all Republican spending combined. It's not even close. So when someone shows you that, this is why I say the class warfare, they go, look, the billionaires. Okay. How about the multimillionaires? How about the multi hundred millionaires? How about those people who pull their resources together? So they have a giant fund like Act Blue who can effectively, if you believe that Elon, Musk can steal an election, you would have to acknowledge that Act Blue has stolen elections and they do so while also demanding no voter ID. They do so while also lobbying the census rule be changed and that illegal aliens be given a path to citizenship. The spending isn't even close. And this is not even taking into account in many cases, just how much is being donated from public sector unions, whether it's the SEIU teachers union, the American labor, you have electricians plumbers where people, their dues go to, to this union who give hundreds of millions of dollars to Democrat candidates, 99% of the time. And these dues paying union members have no say in it, not to mention USA, not to mention the NGOs where some of that money, it's circular and it gets funneled back in. These are just the raw numbers as far as organizations packs and these billionaires, it's not even close. Well, and one of the reasons that the Democrats go after this is because they've had a monopoly, take all the money out of it. $0. We've got a monopoly on all the entertainment and information coming out to the American public. So of course they're like, yeah, get big money out of it because we have all these networks pushing this out. 95 or 97% negative for Donald Trump by these organizations. Like you don't need to spend any money when that's what you have, right? It's not in a vacuum. I believe. Do I have this right? Kamala Harris spent more than anyone on a presidential election at that point in time. She didn't even raise any of it. Yeah. She raised very little of it. I didn't raise it. And what did she do? Her strategy was dump a bunch of money, money, money, money, money and not appear, not have to answer for her policies. So it's, I get it. Money in politics. I understand it. I get that. It's a problem, but only one side complains about it while lying to you, claiming that they don't partake, right? If you actually change this, if you actually changed campaign fight, I actually don't think Democrats would, would win ever because like how much do you take into account? How many billions in free advertising with ABC, NBC, CNN, C, CNBC, MSNBC, or sorry, Ms. Now that's not even taken into account, let alone before this last election and stories being completely censored. People being deplatformed. They have all of that and they outspend Republicans two to one, and they lie to you about it and go look at the billionaires. Kamala Harris spent 1.5 billion and 15 weeks. What's a historic rate of spend that we have never seen, but they show you a debt doing it too. I think there was the, the, the DNC was in debt or the, the, there's some organization was in debt, maybe her campaign, but yeah, it was bad. They spent a ton of money, right? So do me a favor. Uh, don't go cry about the fact that you can't have one political candidate on, and you have to put it on YouTube. We covered that story a few weeks ago. Uh, just do equal time for everybody and no outside money won't do that because you want the monopoly, not to mention the political donations coming from certain industries. So for example, academia, 95 cents of every dollar, many, many, many, many millions of dollars. And you saw my debate with Randall Kennedy. They believe that they are my God, a private institution receiving $700 million. From the federal government. So who do you think, do you think that perhaps the 95 cents of every political dollar, that's the low end of professors and those in academia administrators as well, going to the left, do you think it may have something to do with the fact that the Democrat party just promises them more money, more money, more money with no conditions attached whatsoever. So it's, it's the lies and you see this from the left. We've always known it. And then you have people on the Marxist right, muddying the waters. It's not even close. We've known that this is the game. The problem is the left is simply trying to play. They're trying to just use some sleight of hand here. So you don't realize you don't look behind the curtain. And all of this of course is downstream from culture as Andrew Breitbart discussed because you have again, a lot of small donors, a lot of people who are political activists and women mobilize quite a bit around two central issues usually, and that's usually abortion and then some other form of women's healthcare and everything else is held hostage. As we go into the election and then you have half of this country, more than half of the women in this country make a path of this country who believe that we live in a rape culture and they believe that we live in a culture where men get away with rape and women are blamed if they are raped and there are no good female examples, none in the mainstream female podcast space that brings us to Alex Cooper dropping a special episode on the Cornell case just to let you all know, Hey, you and, and before you go, you too are Jane Doe. If you snort ketamine off a cock and ask for a foursome, if you have been on social media this week, you have most certainly seen four words everywhere. I am Jane Doe as a woman. You probably saw those words. I am unmarriable, knew exactly what they meant. She was a 20 year old student at Cornell university who went to a frat party, a party one night to see a guy she thought was her friend. She eventually went upstairs with him and another fraternity brother. And it was in that room that things took an absolutely disturbing turn by request. And then at 1 42 in the morning, a message went out to a fraternity group chat saying free pussy. These are men talking about a woman being their classmate, their supposed friend. When Jane Doe went to Cornell's campus police three weeks later, she spent hours with an investigator giving a detailed account of what she says happened to her that night. And she was pretty damn clear about one thing. She told the investigator she was 100% confident she had been raped. Right? So believe all women, which of course is stupid on its face. It's as stupid as believe all men. It's as stupid as believe all black men. It's as stupid as believe all black people or believe all white people or believe all Chinese. It's just a really stupid statement to make, but it's time for Call Me Daddy. Oh, he shoots threes on and off the court. I'm professional. Don't love your job. We're men and our bodies and our looks. It's because of male desire. Can you f*** off enough? Can you, as we go on, just replay the last few seconds of that, the last claims that she makes? Mm-hmm. Oh. It didn't work. When Jane Doe went to Cornell's campus police. Weeks later. three weeks later, she spent hours with an investigator giving a detailed account of what she says happened to her that night. Which contradicts her previous account. Plenty of people are 100% confident they've seen Bigfoot. Any minute now, every now and then, I check in on one of those shows, just like, "Is it them saying they heard a noise? It's them saying they heard a noise." So. Believe all Bigfoots. So she hosted this esteemed Cornell professor. Hey, by the way, I would love to have a debate. Kate Mann, we said, who would be next? Kate Mann, please. Kate Mann, Cornell professor. We did Harvard. There you go. Kate Mann, $10,000 check. Kate Mann is known for these runaway hit books. "Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny." "Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny." Oh, boy. "Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny." Oh, boy. Entitled, How Male Privilege Hurts Women. And unshrinking, how to face fat phobia, which I will say I'm kind of angered by because it was just a rip off of my book. Yeah. Unshrinking? It should be shrinking, yeah. Unshrinking? Don't you mean growing? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, exactly right. Inflating? Doctor's like, wow, you've gained a lot of weight. We don't say that here anymore. It's my office, bitch. What are we talking about? Yeah, come on. What do you want, bloating? You want me to say that? Unshrinking. Okay. Uh, what do you want me to do here? You're dying, and I'm about to use my Milwaukee tool to take off your foot. You're about to be unliving. Yeah. I don't know what to tell you. I had to install double doors for my office. Yeah, exactly. Get you in here. Oh, my gosh. We can't even use a gurney. No, we can't. We have to use a sideways hammock and break down the north wall because of your unshrinking. I've told you, they just make up new words. Check out the rest. References, we make them available every show. And go check out the debate with Randall Kennedy. Same thing, they just change words. It's not discrimination, it's restitution. It's not banning, it's free expression through uninvitation. It's not the fattening, it's unshrinking. Unshrinkable. And then we get to, it's not a consensual encounter that took place at college. It is absolutely 100% clearly rape. And before we get to these clips, I want you to keep one thing in mind. Okay? They're establishing a bunch of false premises here, by the way. And I know that she won't show up to debate this professor because they don't want their premise to be checked in any instance. But I want you to think, okay, so let's just grant, let's just assume that we grant it. What's the solution? And when you think of what the solution is, as it's being suggested, if you have a son, if you have a brother, if you have a husband, boyfriend, father, it should be spine-chillingly scary. Now, we have a buzzer here. Just listen to Professor Mann, ironically, regurgitating every single feminist talking point you've ever heard. What we see in this particular case, if her allegations are true, and again, I am just going to state candidly for the record, I believe Jane Doe. So if what she alleges is true, those seven men acted in a way that was just irredeemably entitled. They acted like they were utterly entitled to take what they wanted from her, not because I think they were all that interested in her as a human being, but because they wanted to show off to each other and get points in an intramasculine hierarchy. And basically, Peacock, performed their masculinity in ways that being misogynistic in that game is not a feature, it's a bug. Violating a woman is not like, whoops, I didn't realize what I was doing. It's what they're aiming to do because that gives you points in this intramasculine competition. And so once that entitlement is in place, unfortunately, a lot of people in our patriarchal society actually share this sense that men are entitled to do what they like, to women's bodies. First off, I mean, there's no good way to say it. She looks like she should be fed by a mother bird. Just. Look at that forehead. Not my forehead. She looks like someone from BP should be apologizing while cleaning her off with Dawn and an oil spill. We're sorry. Dawn's so gentle enough, we can wash her with it. Now, everything she just said, if, I believe him. Okay, here are the actual text messages from Jane Doe after the event. Aw, Jonathan, I really appreciate this text. My memory is super clouded, too. I think we were all the way to effing drunk and high. I'm getting a little heat, fi-fi girls, and I can't get my name out of their mouth, but that's to be expected. At the end of the day, none of the sexual stuff was illegal, and honestly, I really liked being with you and Matt, so anything anyone has to say about the gangbang is out of their jurisdiction. I don't think we should, feel any shame for the part, our body, our choice, ASF. In other words, using all the same buzzwords, because she bought the lie that these ladies sell. This episode is everything wrong with dating dynamics, and I get why men wouldn't take the risk. Let me ask you, if you're a man watching, is this a big reason that you've checked out of the dating pool? Is this a big reason that you've just fundamentally changed your approach with women? Because I hear it all the time. And I would just say, you should not go to parties, and you should not, sleep. No. With women. You know, I would say, absolutely wait for marriage at the very, I get that not all of you, subscribe to that, at the very least, a long-term monogamous relationship, away from other people who may be involved in fornication. If even in the next room, be super, super prudent, have a written record of everything, and even that, wouldn't be enough. Because Professor Mane here, wants you to hear more, including a new phrase, that you probably haven't heard before, if you're a logical person. So in the case of Jane Doe, and, many, many other victims of sexual violence, we really have to understand the flight, fight, freeze, or fawn response. Fawn. Where fawning is a way of saying, after the fact, oh, it was okay, oh, I enjoyed it, I think you're nice, even though that is not actually accurate at all, to what the victim ultimately thinks, and to what happened to her. It is rather that she feels like, the only way she can be safe, is to placate him. Fight, flight, or fawn. Wait a second, Jane Doe, fawn. Doe. She just watched Bambi! She just, and that's after Bambi's mom. That's what she's, Doe, fawn, maybe a buck. You better not buck. So let me get this straight, and again, you have to ask, what does this mean? Doe, fawn, maybe a buck? No, it's not a buck. She just watched Bambi, and that's after Bambi's mom. You better not buck. So let me get this straight, and again, you have to ask, what the solution is. A woman may, in fact, consent to group sex, and may, in fact, ask for drugs, and may, in fact, say that yes, I do want to do this, and I do want to continue doing this, and after the fact, may still, there's no longer, because when you think rape, you think fight or flight, because it's an act of aggression, but really, it could be fight, flight, or fawn, where even after the rape, the sexual encounter she consented to, she may continually consent afterwards, and say I liked it, and even ask to do it again, because, the truth is, she's, she's actually unpeeling layers of trauma, so there would be no way to know, and there should be no way to prove it, because it's something that she said, even though we don't believe all the other stuff that she said before, during, and after. And that's why, Alex Cooper decided to chime in with this banger, and again, let's just, let's grant their premise for the sake, of an, of a mental exercise, not even the sake of argument, and ask yourself, okay, so if all this is accepted, what do you solve it? - What has been so sad, but also illuminating, is the amount of women in the comment section, that are like, oh, oh, she, she texted him the next day. I, I stayed with my rapist, for two more years, and continued to date him. - Pause. - I called him the next day. - No, no, no, no, no, no, that's it, no, no, sorry, sorry, I would just say, if you were a rapist, 2023 but you you only accuse them in 2025 and you've been dating since no absolutely not here's what they're doing they're trying to give themselves cover for false rape accusations because these women know women who have made those accusations so now it's a woman can consent a woman can be the aggressor woman can ask for it and then the woman can follow up request a relationship continue engaging in sexual relations enjoyably so go on vacations get engaged and it still is rape what would be the solution let's keep playing texted him the next day i i stayed with my rapist for two more years and continued to date him i called him the next day and asked if you wanted to go to pizza with you i i i went to his house the next day i had consensual sex with him the next day it is so confusing i think because we have not been able to find the right way to talk about this because it's so secretive right that people start to again he's a monster no no this is your friend's brother this is your neighbor this is the kid that sits next to you in class and they look like ordinary guys ah all men are rapists yes rapists everywhere by the way i just want to amend so it's fight flight freeze fun or false accusation if none of the other ones work right got it no no but that will go on they say that doesn't happen oh a false accusation no it never happened well then i remove it from the list because i don't want to be one of those misogynistic and then i even call it a false accusation they're just calling it an accusation actually that's a very valid point okay let's just get rid of the freeze thing because that's stupid uh unless it's arnold schwarzenegger in a banger batman sequel like hey oh you groupies chill you know but scare freeze huh okay fight flight fawn what's more likely the fawn that she says where uh the fawning so after rape has occurred even though it was consensual for years dating the rapist and engaging in consensual relations do you view that should the law view that as well that's post-rape fawning or false accusation meaning years later the relationship goes south he breaks up with her and she accuses him of what's more likely fawning over your rapist or a false accusation genuine question they act like this idea that a court would take into account hold on a second you continue to relationship for a very long time as though everyone got it wrong as though that's not a very strong indicator that you weren't forcefully raped and then professor man confirmed to cooper that they are using like i told you this incident to launch me too part two electric slut aloo i'm curious if you think that we could be witnessing the beginning of another me too movement i do think that it feels like this really incredible momentum that you know thanks to those brilliant student journalists, Cerise and Sophia have really started something that feels like another powerful way in which women are coming together and recognizing lying their ability to protest unjust treatment so i do think we're seeing that what unjust treatment what unjust treatment are you saying that women so the premise here is that women are being treated unjustly before the law because if they're raped by someone who is their boyfriend and they continue a relationship with their boyfriend for years afterward and they are the ones who initiate sex and ask for more sex and even buy outfits and toys to engage in sex they're being treated unfairly because that whole time that was just the post-rape fawning and no one's believing them yeah she would have you believe that cornell pd cornell med the university university of california administration and also the da are all conspiring to deprive her of justice in a liberal state at a very liberal university believe all women let's go with that how about just believe this woman which one do we believe the one who said group sex and ketamine more please and then the next day said everyone better back off i'll mess them up what we did was great and people need to open their mind and sexuality and i loved being with you and i want to be with you again anyone who says that this was a that this was rape and not a gangbang that we enjoyed they're gonna have to answer to me do we believe that one or the one who after she was disinvited from a party decided that she was 100 raped and saw the wendigo look drunk stupid and compromised there's no way to go through life slut imagine if this were your dentist just when i thought i got him to fall in love with clean and tea he's choosing dentists i can tell how do you like that chair it's uh it's a chair it's fine you you ready for your x-ray yeah yeah let's do it okay first we gotta first we gotta numb you up for for an x-ray you have to jello shots yeah you want blue or yellow uh neither i just like to do the x-ray maybe without without this fine okay here put this on listen can we just stop doing that and just take the x-ray please yes give me a second i gotta get the machine okay hey do you want blue or yellow for for the thing in your mouth i don't care i'm colorblind so maybe you pick it he seems like a like a like a oh he seems like a blue guy yellow it doesn't matter where it goes just put it in there yeah it doesn't matter i'm not sure yeah that looks that looks good huh i always do bad at this thing i'm not going to put this in my as doesn't do anything i should have your results here oh it's this thing and then oh have you used this before you should have you should have it shortly okay is that it yeah here you want chicken yeah you can take it home i don't need it hey you know what though you seem like a cool guy you want to get some drinks after this i you know i got some in my pocket it's right here 10 o'clock in the morning man i don't know yellow it's not a no the answer is a no to fit it so we figured yeah good segment with drunken slots i avoided being raped there no you didn't by the way you know mattress girl now has ever seen she's reappearing the lady was proven verifiably that she falsely accused a man of rape she asked him to sodomize her after the relationship and he was like no i think it's best for us if we go our separate ways she ruined his life and now she's back out talking about women the point is it doesn't matter if someone is 100 percent proven to be a liar and the accusations were life destroyingly dishonest and corrosive the left will champion them anyways you still have people who believe that my god george floyd wasn't on a speedball you still have some people out there who believe that my god mike brad his hands were up and don't shoot it doesn't matter they don't care you still have some people who believe that abrigo garcia was not a human trafficker but my god just a maryland man she's following on hard times though she's futon girl now right yes she's fulled out couch that's heavy to carry it's better than being sleeping bad girl don't you want that girl either oh there goes old sleeping bad girl there goes old congo throw up tent girl wherever she goes she has a bed as she goes to rei looking for another victim that's right i don't know why she goes rei she overpays for all this crazy she has a membership it's fine and here's the thing like i told you woke to it's going to be just as bad it's going to be worse and here's the thing it's going to be dumber um well there's another case in point ashley sinclair you know the lady who's famous for uh targeting and sleeping with elon musk because he's a billionaire well she decided to take direct aim at the real problem the manosphere is it the main motor yeah they're blaming women for for most of these issues because they need someone to blame they need someone to blame but themselves that that it's only fans that's corrupting western civilization and destroying the country it's sexual degeneracy it's this that and the other it's women voting the sherlock it's that we have no fault divorce rather than looking inward and saying oh maybe it's the billionaires at the inauguration why did you sleep with elon musk sexual prowess yeah because of this because of his stunning physique maybe the problem is the billionaires name me one other reason that you slept with elon musk she loves him for his mind seems like a good father oh that's right women can't be held accountable for that either right no it's the billionaires who are the problem the problem was so attractive that it was the sole qualifier as to why you slept with this man and wanted to carry his baby and get that bag right and then fumbled it massively right then she even admitted to this interviewer donny o'sullivan i haven't seen him before that uh hey surprise surprise when you sleep with a billionaire just because he's a billionaire and then that doesn't automatically make you a billionaire which i know goes with feminist logic uh now she's a socialist are you a democrat now uh are you a democratic socialist are you one of the communists are you um so i am a deuce paying member of dsa but i oh you're a dsa member yeah recently a little bit ago oh you're a dangerous leftist radical and by the way that's just something they say you know it comes from like the whole fascist thing but that's also a big thing that democratic socialists say and uh those were the words that's why they were engraved on the bullets the cartridges reserved for charlie kirk remember we broke that bella chow was one catch you fascist so here's the real reason that she now says billionaires are the problem whereas before she exclusively tried to sleep with billionaires because elon's no longer interested in her he posted this on x this weekend he said ashley sinclair was not she's not my girlfriend we only saw each other like a few times i mean she just she touched my winner it was cool and you know she read this yeah now take we we see it play out in real time that's me how i know where women when they don't get their exact way they go actually everything about that man is a problem actually you know what he's a rapist even though i engaged in a consensual relationship he is in fact a rapist i was fawning again i ask you what's the solution here and what accountability does ashley sinclair have for sleeping exclusively with wealthy namely a billionaire if they're the problem well aren't you an enabler because some people said that men in many cases they become billionaires so that they can have the spoils of a harem of yachts whatever it is i don't know necessarily how billionaires think but you rewarded it you reinforce that behavior for no reason other than the fact he's a billionaire now here's the thing let me ask you this she's like let's assume that you're a shallow whore just for the sake of argument good assumption let's assume ashley sinclair that you're a dumb shallow whore yes uh gold digging dumb shallow whore to be clear better what did elon musk have to gain from you in other words let's say he found you attractive let's say it was a casual relationship let's say it didn't continue on the flower of love did not blossom what did he stand to gain from you aside from if not love a consensual encounter in other words the only thing that he stood to gain was something consensual you were on equal footing what you stood to gain was something that you could procure no other way if not sleeping for a billionaire that almost seems an abuse of power. Why is it just if someone is powerful and has a lot to offer that that must mean they're abusing it and not the person seeking out unearned power or resources? Elon Musk stood to gain nothing other than a night, maybe a girlfriend, and it didn't work out. She stood to gain what she thought stupidly was going to be a billion dollars. But she has the moral high ground. I'm telling you, Marxism in the West, it nine times out of 10, it looks like feminism. And we are a little bit over time. So we're going to continue with some of these call, call her daddy, but you call me daddy podcast clips. If you are not a member, you'll continue watching Haley Carania for free. Or if you want to see more of these, if you want to see more of these debates, if you want to see more, change my mind, whatever it is, investigative journalism, or watch the whole show. Ad free, get 100% more show. Click the rumble premium button. Subscribe there. It's $99 here to get this wonderful hand etched mug and be in the club or $9 a month allows us to, you know, have a little bit of runway and set up some more debates set up some more. Of course, this election stream is going to cost us millions of dollars be here will be the most accurate place on the planet in calling elections like we were at the last major election. And outside of that, you know, we'll see you guys tomorrow at 11am. Here's the next clip. Professor Mann, made it clear that no matter what a woman does, she should not cannot and will not be held responsible. I do want to be able to have these kinds of conversations with my daughter where and she's just six, nearly seven, but I want to be able to feed her from your mouth. So I'm going to go ahead and get started.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. Congresswoman Ilhan Omar's home was raided by federal agents over alleged immigration fraud, including marrying her brother, which the host claims is a pattern of misconduct.
  2. The investigation is criticized as politically motivated, with concerns that it occurs close to election time and potentially interferes with voting.
  3. The show disputes claims that Republicans are primarily funded by billionaires, arguing that Democrats, especially through groups like Act Blue, have outspent Republicans by billions.
  4. A central cultural theme is the debate over consent, rape definitions, and "fawning" after rape, with the host arguing that post-rape relationships are misrepresented and that false accusations are being normalized.
  5. The host criticizes feminist left narratives that equate attraction to younger women with predation, claiming it denies biological reality and leads to moral panic.
  6. A real-life case involving Jane Doe at Cornell University is cited to show inconsistencies in allegations, with the host asserting that post-rape relationships do not negate the initial act.
  7. The show claims that cultural narratives around gender, consent, and power are being weaponized to suppress dissent and create a "rape culture" myth.
  8. A recurring theme is the critique of misinformation in media, especially regarding political spending and gender dynamics, with the host calling out selective reporting and false cause correlations.

Summary:

The transcript presents a politically charged and culturally critical commentary that examines several interconnected themes. It opens with allegations of immigration fraud against Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, citing a federal raid on her home and questioning whether such actions are politically motivated or legally justified. The host argues that this investigation, while framed as serious, may be part of broader "lawfare" tactics near election time.

A major counterpoint is the claim that Democrats, not Republicans, are overwhelmingly funded in politics—specifically highlighting Act Blue’s massive spending, which dwarfs Republican contributions. The discussion then shifts to cultural issues around consent, rape, and gender dynamics, with the host challenging feminist narratives that equate attraction to younger women with predation. The analysis includes a detailed critique of the "fawning" response post-rape, asserting that continued relationships after sexual violence do not negate the act of rape.

The show also examines real-world cases, such as Jane Doe at Cornell and Ashley Sinclair’s relationship with Elon Musk, to argue that accusations are often used as tools of social control rather than based on evidence. Throughout, the host maintains that political and cultural narratives are being manipulated to suppress free speech, create moral panic, and blame women for societal issues. The tone is confrontational, blending factual claims with strong ideological assertions, ultimately aiming to expose what it sees as systemic misinformation and cultural distortion in mainstream discourse.

FAQs

Yes, a federal criminal investigation is underway following a search warrant executed at her home in Washington, D.C. The Department of Justice and Homeland Security Investigations are involved, and the investigation focuses on alleged immigration and marital fraud.

The show disputes that claim, stating that Democrats have outspent Republicans in recent elections. It highlights that Act Blue alone donated over $1.9 billion, more than all Republican spending combined, and that most major political spending comes from Democratic-aligned sources like unions and public sector groups.

Yes, the show claims Ilhan Omar allegedly married her brother to circumvent immigration requirements, calling this an act of marital fraud that could constitute immigration fraud under U.S. law.

The show argues that any sexual encounter involving non-consensual or coercive behavior constitutes rape, and criticizes the idea that a woman's continued relationship with a partner after an alleged rape is evidence of consent or 'fawning.'

Yes, the show challenges the narrative that survivors 'fawn' after rape, pointing out that such behavior is not a sign of consent and can be used to minimize or deny the severity of the trauma experienced.

No, the show argues that the accusation is based on a misunderstanding of consent and that inviting women to a show does not equate to rape. It suggests the claim is politically driven and reflects a broader cultural bias against men dating younger women.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.