BREAKING: FINALLY! Dems KICK Ilhan Omar, Mamdani & DSA’s “Pack of Fools” OUT

Finally, finally, finally, finally, dare I say, the Democrats are starting to get just a little bit smart. If that's even possible. I mean, we're going out on a limb here. There's my shot. There's my shot. Now we know what I'm talking about. It is really good to have you guys here. If you have not subscribed, do me the favor, make sure you subscribe to the show. Really, really important. Especially now, especially now. Gosh, it's been hard. It's been hard always to get through, to break through. And I think that has a little something to do with an election coming up anyway. Democrats finally, finally, finally waking up. Finally, recognizing that they need to kick a certain somebody in a certain, well, a few somebodies out of the party. And by somebodies, I mean the pack of fools as James Carville is referring them to, you know, Carville, right? The mouth from the South. Oh, no, wait. I think he's the raging Cajun or whatever they're calling him. Anyway, he's the guy who, um, it really has been kind of a big, big shot in the party for quite some time. And he, together with some others like Rahm Emanuel, et cetera, they are going on and on about how they need to basically rid themselves of all of these nut jobs. And believe me, they're nut jobs. And it just, and we'll get to, we'll get to Carville. But before I do, I want to give you the proof. You need to know how bad these people really and truly are. For example, I found this little one. They're talking about how much they hate the constitution, how they need to have a revolution. This country, they hate the constitution. They hate everything America. Just, just watch it. So you know what we're up against. So the two things that we're famous for, uh, is our commitment to a program and our, uh, hatred of the United States constitution. And what the program does is it gives us a roadmap to revolution. And it gives us the obstacle that we finally will have to get over to have a revolution, which is the United States constitution. The basis of the United States government and what the minimum maximum program specifically, what that format specifically gives us is, uh, that roadmap. It gives us the minimum, uh, circumstances under which we would be able to take power and govern. And it gives us the maximum program, which is the goals that we're actually aiming for. It also, uh, clarifies democracy as both the end goal and as part of the process to get there ensures the internal party democracy that we want to see in DSA. So it, it, it really wraps up, uh, the revolutionary tradition of democracy that I think socialism and abolitionism in the United States have always been a part of, uh, and aims it, you know, at, at a future that we can live in as a, as a human species, because I think absent a revolutionary, uh, democratic socialist Republic in North America, we may not have a livable future. No, no, no, no. Okay. Um, yeah, we won't have a livable future. If, if you guys actually see the light of day, I mean, these people are honestly nuts and I love how they try and hide behind this intellectualism, right? They're like, Oh, we're so smart. We're so smart. And you know, we want to go full on commie. I mean, they're a problem. They, they tend to be violent. I don't know if you saw the news about the guy who was going after Besant today. Yeah. He's in big trouble. There was some kind of trans nut job that was going after Besant and wanted to, um, take him out. So, you know, there, there's a, there's a, dare I say, sort of a, a, a threat of commonality here amongst these DSA radicals amongst the Antifa types. And I think it's quite dangerous for our country period full stop, but they're everywhere. By the way, if you're just tuning in, remember to subscribe, share, like they're, they're, they're everywhere. They're even in Florida, even in good old healthy red Florida, you get this guy, Elijah Manley, he's running for a congressional seat there. And I want you to hear him talking to Martha McClain. The look on her face as he's about to say what he says, uh, kind of says it all. Um, you know, I've spent time with ICE agents in Texas. Uh, they're hardworking. They're upholding the laws that exist on the books that if you enter the country illegally, and especially if you have a criminal record or a detainer against you, you have to be removed. And when they wake up in the morning and they show up at work, they have assignments that are given to them to remove people who are criminal or who have detained, who have removed orders against them. Do you have any problem with someone who fits that criteria being, um, apprehended and removed from our country? Well, I just don't think it's a good idea to take someone who committed a murder and say, go, go back home and live free and enjoy the rest of your life. If someone comes to this country and they commit murder or violence, we have American jails that we can put them in and make sure they never see daylight again. Because we're just going to keep them here and we're going to make you pay for it, right? Like, heck, why not? Why not? No, I'm not bringing the entire world. Why can't we be like Spain? Hey, Ceuta, you're looking pretty good right about now to these jokers, right? We'll just keep bringing them here one after another. You commit a crime, no worries. You get three squares a day for the rest of your life, courtesy of Uncle Sam and all us crazy, stupid US taxpayers, because we elect morons like you, okay? Wow. Yeah, the Democrat Party needs to like clean house really fast. And not this, just this guy down in Florida, not just the nutty woman out there. You know, she's from Ethiopia and Colorado that says we just need more people from the global south coming here so that we can take down the tyranny that is the United States of America. Not just these folks, but also El-Sayed, who's getting all kinds of traction, Abdul El-Sayed, out in Michigan. This is a guy who hates America. This is a guy who hates Israel. This is a guy who loves Palestine. This is a guy who wants to take away your health care so that it becomes state-run. That'll go over real well. Yeah, they'll have government-run health care just like they have government-run daycares out there in Minnesota. We'll make Michigan just like Minnesota. I'm sorry, this guy is not good. He's bad news. Abdul El-Sayed wants to be in charge of. Your health care. I don't know if you'll get to live under him. What Medicare for All does is it does away with the private insurance market, right? It now has one single payer. That's why we call it single payer, right? One insurance. And that is the government of the United States. Yeah. Okay. So, you know, at least he's not hiding it. It's right out there in the open, everyone. El-Sayed said he wants one team and one team only. No corporations, no private markets, just the government of the United States of America running your health care. Good luck with that. I mean, good luck. I'm overseas in the UK. You want to talk about bad health care? Try the UK, all right? You're going to wait in line for everything. You want to get a certain test? Your doctor thinks you need a certain test? Good luck with that. It's whether or not people like El-Sayed think that you qualify for it. You know, this is one of the things that Natalie Harp is so upset about. You know that name, Natalie Harp? The one that John Ossoff is trying to bring up. Lovely young woman who works for the president and he helped save her life thanks to health care policy that made sense. We're going to talk about that today. But you look at El-Sayed and these jihadists, as the president is now referring to them, and you understand the Democrats really want these people gone. They want them out of the party for good because it's just too easy. I mean, honestly, you know, hey, Hillary Clinton did say it was smart politics, right? Because the right, she said, was sort of on to something with this narrative of communism, this narrative of socialism. And by the way, we don't even have to make it up. We're not coming up with anything, right? It's right there out for the pickings. El-Sayed just said what he said. The Florida guy saying, hey, you know, why do we have to send anybody home? They commit a crime, keep them here. Three squares a day. You've got all of these people saying stupid thing after stupid thing after stupid thing. And by the way, they love going out into the media and saying all these stupid things. You get Mamdami, who's a disaster on steroids. And by the way, he doesn't get anything done, can't get anything done because all of his policies, you know what, suck. Okay, they suck. All right. And that communist grocery store, forget about it. You think you want the government and the business of running a grocery store? For goodness sakes. Hey, it's been tried all over Eastern Europe. It's been tried in the USSR. It was tried in Vietnam. They tried it in Venezuela. It didn't work out so well. Anyway, Carville knows this. And this is why he went on Fox last night. And he said, you know what? They're a pack of fools. They're out. He's done with them. He doesn't even think they're relevant anymore. I get news from them. They kind of are. I'm worried about the Democrats right now. I'm not. We're going to win the House. You're not worried about the communists taking over the party? No, no. They're a bunch of silly people. Those people you had on there, those DSA people, they're a pack of fools. No one pays attention to them. They're not going to do anything. Now, do you want to ask me about AOC? I do think she's very, very talented. She's certainly to the left of me, but you know what she's doing? What I think good politicians do, she's growing into the job. She's not the same person she was when she was elected in 2018. Okay. Now, why would you say that? Oh, it might be because she said woke one was crazy, right? She's been trying to distance herself from woke one, the crazy woke one. I mean, I actually happen to think that woke two is even crazier. AS I SAID, CERTIFIABLE NOW. was bad. Woke two is definitely bad. Woke two is the rise of all these fools and crazy people out there. So of course she's trying to distance herself because, you know, she's running ahead up in New Hampshire, although New Hampshire may not get its primary first in the nation if the Democrat party has anything to say about it. You see, they don't like all those white people in New Hampshire having the most say. So they want to send it down to South Carolina, which they feel would be more represent, more representative perhaps of their party as a live free or die native. I beg to differ. I think New Hampshire is kind of a good place and AOC is kind of running ahead. So AOC is looking at it and she's like, okay, I can't be that crazy. I mean, if I'm going to win New Hampshire, which yeah, I know like all those, you know, we like to call them assholes. They've been creeping up the liberals from Massachusetts. They've been creeping up into good steady Eddie New Hampshire and consequently turning that state blue. Although for whatever reason, New Hampshire seems to elect Republican. Governors, but they're sending a lot of blue folks into Congress and a lot of blue folks into the Senate. But I will tell you this in New Hampshire, live free or die. There is no state income tax and no sales tax. So they still believe in small limited government, which is why the commie stuff's not going to really fly, which is why you've got AOC trying to drift to the center saying woke one was crazy. And now all of a sudden James Carville is going to come out and back her because apparently he's trying to throw them a little carrot, throw him a little bone, you know, if you guys get with the program and you try and sound like sensible human beings and more like adults, maybe we will welcome you. But keep in mind, he really isn't into this. I mean, all this woke ism, these pronoun things, the trans stuff, the guys playing in women's sports. This is not growing on him. And he called this out several months ago. So maybe we need to have a schism. Maybe you in use, you got plenty different justice party to work in. The socialist party. The only thing I've asked is just don't use the word democratic in any title that you have, because most Democrats that I know are running for office don't want you, your name don't want you to be part of the deal. Yeah. Sure. They would be glad to take your votes. Who wouldn't? Everybody wants to get as many votes as they can. Maybe you come up with your own name and by the way, nothing against after the election. You can sit down and do like it's done in parliamentary governments or governments around the world. You sit down and you say, okay, we want to be part of a government majority. And we have these things that we want you to do to bring us in. And we have negotiations and we figure a way that we can live with different parties, different titles, but under the same general philosophical roof. As I've always said, been very clear, that most of the things that the faculty lines identity left wants 85% of them. I want to, we'd like to expand up to two people. We'd like to expand people that have healthcare. We'd like to do more to help young voters. Uh, we think that environmental problems are totally crushing that we faced with what solutions air. We think income inequality is, is, is, is a terrible thing. And we've got to do certain things to address it. Like, Oh, okay. We've grown, raised taxes on incomes over 40 years. We've got to do certain things to address it. Like, Oh, okay. Like, Oh, okay. Like, Oh, okay. $400,000 a year, raise the minimum wage. These are things that we can work on. I don't think we can work together on pro-mountain politics. I don't know. I think that you're not, this election did not teach you how damaging that is. I don't think there's anything that I can tell you. And you say this guy is stuck in another century, not another decade. And he represents nothing to do with the future of our movement. I can accept that. You're not really going to hurt my feelings. So maybe we could have a kind of amicable split here. And we'll go to post in 2026. Because you don't ever run, they never run against a Republican. All they do is run against other Democrats. I don't quite. I don't quite understand why you're so anxious to have the word Democrat in the description of what you do. But maybe we can have an amicable split here. And you go your way, and we go our way. And after the election, we come together and see how much common ground we can find. I don't think you're going to find any, though. I mean, I really, really, really don't. And I'm not the only one. I mean, in other words, this communism thing, again, go back in history, go throughout time. It never has worked. It is a disaster. And Hillary Clinton even knows this. Hillary Clinton, I want to play this for you. Here she is talking with a woman who used to be a tech reporter, a tech business reporter, but somehow now is a political reporter. Go figure. Kara Swisher. And she's speaking on her show. And she's like, you know, this communism thing, they're going to have a lot of rope there. In other words, this is going to work. And I imagine it's tested. And this is a. A line that's going to work. And, of course, this doesn't need to be a line. This is reality. This is what these candidates are saying. And these are the candidates that are winning, for goodness sakes. Right. So you're not going to convince Republican voters in Michigan. And the real fight will be how how do we make sure that people who voted for Haley feel comfortable voting for Abdul El-Said? And how do we get independents to feel comfortable? And you can see that it's not just about Michigan, but the Republican messaging is communist socialist. It's going to be a very effective attack. And so people on the left have to be prepared to to answer that and to be effective at answering it. Do you think communists is an effective attack in 2026? Well, all I know is that's the attack that Trump is leading with. And I assume they've tested it. And I assume that they have reason to believe that it's effective or they wouldn't be beating the drum on it. Because now it's not just him. Vance has done it. Others are doing it. They are trying to, you know, bring back scare tactics about our candidates. And, you know, it didn't work in New York. Mamdani was elected and there was a lot of money spent against him. When you have an effective candidate on the left, it still is going to be a close race on our side. Aha. So you see what's happening. You've got sort of the mature adults in the room, whether that be. You know, the op ed that was put out recently in The Wall Street Journal by Rahm Emanuel, whether it be Carvel going on. And for goodness sakes, Carvel's going on Fox to plead his case. Think about that, guys. Think about that. Maybe this is a new Democrat party. They're like, hey, maybe we can pull off some Republicans here. Doubt it. That's not happening. Anyway, they don't really have a party right now unless they kick these people out. So this is exactly what they're trying to do. They got Ilhan Omar, who, by the way, I mean, even under the Biden Treasury Department, there were a lot of questions. About whether there was some nefarious activity. And I'm getting a little fed up. I mean, as are you. Granted, we just got a new AG there in Todd Blanche. But we want some answers on that because I suspect that there's some there there where it comes to when it comes to feeding our future, etc. So you've got some people that are dubious on the financial front. And by the way, you don't even have to find anything. The fact that she came out and said, I got 30 million bucks to my name. My net worth is 30 million. Oopsie daisy. Suddenly it's less than 100K. But like, that's not normal. Just not normal. And then you've got El Saeed with his nonsense. And you've got the Ethiopian girl out in Colorado. Yeah. And you've got, I call them the backup singers because I can't remember any of their names. But they're all a bunch of nut jobs in New York that are Mamdami disciples. And these people are winning. Okay. So like they are winning. So if you thought the squad was a big deal before, if you thought the squad was crazy. Hey, guess what? Wake up to the new reality of the Democrat Party. It is a dangerous, dangerous bunch. But I look at them all and I'm like, no wonder, no wonder. Brand new study out shows that apparently low testosterone is associated with being a Democrat. I saw this recently. I was like, you gotta be kidding me. Is this a joke? Oh, no, no, no, no. This is a real study, a real scientific study. And they have now proven somehow testosterone. Testosterone administration induces a red shift. So if you just give people more testosterone, they'll suddenly get all MAGA on you. Who knew? That is fascinating. So this is a study that is in the public medical center and National Library of Medicine with access to scientific literature. So of course I had to read it. And here we go. Testosterone administration induces a red shift in Democrats. An experiment was run to test if a testosterone administration, in other words, giving testosterone, would influence the political preferences of 136 healthy males. Now, the only caveat in this study, they did point out that they were mostly working with college kids. So it was very hard to find Republicans. So apparently testosterone levels aren't what they used to be amongst college kids these days. You know, somehow this doesn't surprise me as we look at, for example, these DSA nut jobs. So the two things that we're famous for. is our commitment to a program and uh, hatred of the United States constitution. And what the program does is it gives us your hatred of the United States constitution. It suddenly all makes sense to me. Now, when I read that the testosterone levels in these 136 healthy males that they looked at over the span of a number of years, um, is very much associated with being left. So if you have low T count, low testosterone, chances are you're a Democrat. So now the whole tampon Tim thing, it really makes sense. Like we joke about it, right? I know, I know between, between us family here, we like to joke about it, but it's actually like a scientific fact of sorts. Here we go. I'm going to just read from the study, the results before the testosterone treatment, we found that affiliated Democrats had 19% higher basal testosterone than those who identified strongly with the party. So if you're strongly identified with the Democrats, the super libs, they're really low T when weekly affiliated Democrats received additional testosterone. What do you know? The strength of their party affiliation fell by 12%. So if you got a little T count, suddenly you weren't much of a Dem anymore. And they reported 45% warmer feelings towards Republican candidates for president. Testosterone administration did not affect political preferences for strongly affiliated Democrats or strong or weak Republicans. So apparently if you're a Republican, it doesn't matter if you are super duper strong Democrat. Well, you're just a lost cause. This is fantastic. I just think this is hilarious. The conclusion is our results demonstrate that testosterone induces a red shift among weekly affiliated Democrats, providing evidence that testosterone does affect political preference. Who knew? Who knew? Is this why Pete Hegseth is like, hey, we need to make sure that we get enough T count amongst our military members right now? Speaking of military, the Strait of Hormuz is open for business, everyone. According to the president, New Truth Social out today, the president of the United States says there are no talks nor conversations going on or scheduled with the Islamic Republic of Aram. The naval blockade remains in full force and effect. The Hormuz Strait is open and operating. All water mines have been removed or detonated. Thank you for your attention to this matter, President Donald J. Trump. So he says it's been demined. The Strait of Hormuz, it has been demined. It is now open. It is operating, as I said, open for business. The 60 day Iran talk. Remember they were having this sort of period of talking, which basically, unfortunately for us, turned into an opportunity for Iran to cause more havoc and more. Trouble. But that's OK. Look, you know what? It's OK, because if they don't want to play ball. We won't. And we will take over the Strait of Hormuz, as apparently we have done. The president is now ready to call it a U.S. territory. The president saying, you know what? This thing is ours, baby. We got the Strait. Here is another social post you put out today. Take a look at the Persian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and the Strait of Hormuz in the middle. Oman on one side, Iran on the other. And he says this puppy is ours. New U.S. territory is the title on the graphic he posted there on True Social. So what does this really mean? Let's go and listen to him. This is from yesterday's presser. And someone asked him, hey, you know, could it be a U.S. territory? And he said, gee, I like the sound of that. Kind of has a nice ring to it, right? With the blockade. We have a blockade. We control it with a blockade. And I like the idea of declaring it a territory. We have total control over the Strait. Now, they can be a nuisance. They can put a mine in the water. And people don't like having mines hit their billion dollar ships, you know, et cetera. But the blockade has been very effective. And, you know, we're taking out. Now, maybe that will stop or maybe it'll open up even further. But we're taking out millions of barrels of oil a week. If you look at the kind of numbers that we're doing, we're doing the Strait is open and the oil prices are coming down and they will continue to come down unless we decide. To do something far more drastic than we're doing. Iran is in big trouble. They have 300 percent inflation. The country is a mess and the military is totally defeated. Thank you very much. Yeah, their military is a mess. But they can create a lot of havoc, right, with these little boats that they get flying around through the Strait of Hormuz. And so they had some water mines there. Apparently they have been taken out. So now you just have to worry about these little things. But here's the thing. We're not going to do anything. Here's the good news. We got a blockade. And boy, oh, boy, do we have a blockade. This is a big, big wall of steel, as he's calling it. By the way, comes with a lot of economic pain to the tune of I've seen 400 percent increase in inflation in food prices. Big article in The Wall Street Journal today on that. In other words, the Iranians are really facing this mass inflation scenario. How much it hurts the powers that be. I mean, that's still very much in question. And that's where it comes into sort of a state of importance for the Treasury Department, because they're going to have to make sure that they're going to have a state of importance for sure that they really clamp down on all banking processes and that we cut off Iran from everything, which means you want to do business with the US of A. You don't do business with Iran. We get sanctions on Iran. That means you can't. Hey, Spain, I'm looking at you. Hey, Spain, you can't go behind our back and start trading with Iran. I mean, they were trading up until pretty recently that we know about. And so that stuff has got to end. And, you know, it's important for other economies. And I'm talking about China. I'm talking about India, places that think, OK, I can still get oil from Iran. You're not going to be able to get cheap anything. You're not going to be able to get anything because we get the wall of steel right there. So nicely, artistically drawn, the president putting this one out just yesterday on True Social saying wall of steel. This is the blockade. And so, in other words, you're not going to be able to get the oil out. And so pretty soon this becomes a bigger and bigger problem for Iran. In fact, this is how we came to that memorandum of understanding, that 60 day pause that we were in because we had put up this wall of steel. We had put up the economic blockade and that was costing them so much money. And all of the Ayatollah's cronies, all the hardliners that he put in, they were bleeding cash. They were losing a lot of money in part because of the sanctions and all of the banking regulations and rules that Besson had made sure were actively employed. And so as they started to lessen that, the idea was, OK, we will take off some of these restrictions, provided that one, you agree that you're not going to enrich uranium and two, that you agree we are going to have a presence there in the Strait of Hormuz to make sure that people can safely get through back and forth. And when it turned out that they didn't want all of that, when it turned out that they decided they wanted to do something bigger somehow, perhaps with Oman, by the way, Oman, don't even think about it. The president says we are going to, well, kick the you know what out of you if you decide to do anything with Iran. But when it came to be that we found they were going behind our back and trying to find other ways to make this a bigger conflict, that's when we said, OK, it's game over and we're just going to take the thing over. We're just going to make it a U.S. territory. Of course, that comes with a certain amount of responsibility from a military standpoint. But it seems we are willing and obviously able to take that one on. But, you know, just so that nobody gets any ideas. The president was speaking with Fox News just yesterday morning and made his intentions vis-a-vis Oman quite clear. The president told Fox News Iran should raise the white flag of surrender. He went on to say, I have no time schedule. I'm not in a hurry. The president indicating that the U.S. naval blockade is continuing to put new economic pressure on the Iranian regime, despite what the Iranians have said publicly. He said they're good poker players, but they're dying and that the midterms in the president's thinking. Now, I asked the president about these parallel talks that are taking place in Oman about control of the Strait of Hormuz. And the president told Fox News if Oman gets in the way, we'll bomb the S out of them. We went on to talk about a variety of different regional topics, including the U.S. stockpiles of weapons that are currently stationed in the Middle East. The president says what we've used so far is peanuts. He went on to say the United States has a lot of mid-level weapons and that many of the more advanced systems, the president says, were given away by President Biden to Ukraine, for example, about air defense that is needed right now in the Middle East. OK, so, you know. We're we're kind of a big deal. I mean, not to toot our own horn too much, but we are the United States of America. We do have plenty of aircraft carriers. We're sending new aircraft carriers en route there to relieve the USS Abraham. And the reality is, you know, Iran may say it wants a bigger war. Iran may want to escalate this, but we've kind of locked up all our allies there. So they don't have a head. I want to take you through the map just a little bit here. You can see so the Strait of Hormuz that would be right between Iran and Oman. If you look there, can I I can't really show you on this map. I need to get like a pointer or something. But anyway, at this point, I think you know where it is. Right. I've put it on enough graphic titles on the YouTube channel. Anyway, you can also see they have been quite active with their resources vis-a-vis the Houthis in that part of Yemen that is kind of important because it helps. Saudi Arabia get its oil stores out of the Red Seas through to the Gulf of Aden and then into the Arabian Sea and the Indian Ocean. And so they're kind of working up all of their lieutenants, so to speak, that they've got in Yemen, and they are trying to create more of a strangling of Saudi Arabia right there. Don't forget, Iran is very upset because what's been going on, we have got them surrounded. Basically, you've got Egypt, you've got Yemen, forgive me, not Yemen, you've got Saudi Arabia, you've got Iraq, you've got Syria, you've got Kuwait, you've got Jordan, Oman, you've got all of these countries. Oman's a little on the sus side, but a lot of countries signing on Morocco to be more aligned with the United States. And thus, what does Iran do in that situation? It finds itself increasingly in the corner. So now it's kind of striking out, this is its last hurrah. And I don't think it's got a whole lot of time here to be able to play this game. And I say that only because, again, I'm looking at the economics of what's going on, and you're losing somewhere around 400, 500 million dollars pretty regularly. So there's a big article in the Wall Street Journal, I actually want to share some of this with you today, because it's rather significant, the economic pain, if you would, that they are facing. And so you're talking about possibly 400 percent inflation just in the last month, in terms of food prices that the people of Iran face. So how much longer, really, can that go on? I mean, I understand they're willing to starve their people. I understand they're willing to make it miserable for their people. But you really need to ask whether or not that can continue, because that is just such a massive blow, massive blow to the population. I will say that you've got a team over there in Iran. And I think one of you guys, was it David mentioning this? Or, oh, Cat Crazy Sam saying, look, you know, this whole team over in Iran is thinking we've got midterms coming up. If we can just make life miserable into midterms, then perhaps we can force the Trump MAGA movement out of power, thereby lending ourselves some more opportunity. And heck, you know, opportunity galore. They get Ilhan Omar, they get Rashida Tlaib, they get Ma'am Dami, they've got al-Said. I mean, they got all their peeps, right, that are trying to make inroads there. So look, we need to see where Oman is coming out. As we look at this map, there are some reports that Oman may be, in fact, favoring Iran in this situation. And this is why the president is making it clear that he is going to bomb the S-H-you-know-what out of them. So the Wall Street Journal is saying they want a bigger war. Of course they do. I mean, this really doesn't surprise you. Like, I mean, I've been talking about this forever. We've got a market today that is lower. Let me see if it's continuing to be lower. Don Backo. They're telling us he's busy, busy, busy trading. And it's hard when I'm on this early. The thing is, I'm on very early this week, of course, because I'm still overseas. But we do have a market that's coming back a little bit. You know, it had been down a little bit further there on the Dow earlier in the session. But some red there, tech stocks sliding, bond yields at decade highs right now. You know, and one of the things that still looks very interesting to me, as it always does, of course, I'm a long-term holder, is, of course, gold. And gold prices, I believe, are actually down. I know I bought a little bit myself earlier in the session because, you know, I like to, I like to, it's that clearance thing, right? You know, you grow up shopping at Marshalls and your dad tells you clearance is the best brand. You think it's like Chanel or something. You know, it's kind of, you can take the girl out of New Hampshire. You can't take the New Hampshire out of the girl. So, you know, when things go down, that's usually when I get in. You know, there's a reason, though, that gold has been so popular over the last several years. And I imagine with all this political uncertainty, we're going to see that continuation of it. As much as I want King Dollar and a triumphant USA and a hegemonic power vis-a-vis the USA versus the rest of the world, I also recognize what the rest of the world is doing. And they're all buying gold for a reason, right? They're trying to buoy their central bank and their power, as Dr. Kirk, one of our show sponsors, so eloquently explains. Let me show you here. You can go back to a couple years now, the Basel III Accord, which basically said what? It made gold a tier one asset, meaning it's viewed as currency in terms of lending. If banks are in the business of lending, they don't want to lend a worthless currency. They want to have collateral backstopping their lending, which is why central banks around the world didn't stop allocating into gold. In fact, they're adding to it. So what do we do then as individual investors? Do what they do, just on a smaller scale, right? You can buy gold by the ounce. You can buy silver by the ounce. You don't have to buy it by the ton. Do exactly what they're doing, because I think that the global financial system is changing. There's this paradigm-shifting moment from currency creation as fiat money, basically meaning you just press a button when you need money, right, versus something that's collateralized, that has a sound, solid backdrop. That is what sound money is all about. And this is where the gold is. And this is where the global international financial monetary system is moving towards. So I get where, you know, he's going. In other words, all of the monetary system is trying to diversify. I don't want it to, right? Don't get me wrong. But, you know, I am a realist in all of this. And as an investor myself, I think it's important to hold these diversified commodities. So you've got countries all around the world, they're trying to diversify. And that diversification strategy very much includes. I mean, this is why I say Trish loves gold and silver. Go check them out when you can. Trish loves gold and silver. Yeah. I think it's got a nice ring to it. Anyway, Democrats are kind of panicking here. We've got a Democrat senator that's very worried all of a sudden because, well, this guy, a.k.a. Pee Wee Herman, if you listen to the president, has got himself in a little bit of a pickle. It's really not a good look. I mean, attacking a young woman like this, I mean, they're going back to a stupid playbook, but, you know, he's a stupid guy. And this is actually what got the president so annoyed yesterday. Remember this in the press conference? On those military exercises. Whoa. OK, so he was not too happy with her. This happened to be the CNN reporter that actually also had asked him about this Senator Ossoff, a.k.a. Pee Wee Herman, and what he was alleging or insinuating about the president's relationship with one of his aides, his aide, who is a young woman and said to be very, very, very loyal to him. This is the woman that he picked to go with him, remember, on the plane when the plane was transferred. They transferred him, I should say, on that catering cart. And she's sort of his lifeline there in the White House, his personal assistant. And she likes him very much. And that's it. It's a platonic relationship. And yet you get some idiots out there doing idiotic things, including this particular senator from Georgia. And so, I just want to give you sort of the background as you consider why he was so mad. It was because this CNN reporter asked him this question. And again, this senator is backpedaling right now because this has just come with all kinds of repercussions. And it's not a good look for him, frankly, politically, especially, I mean, they're supposed to be all about women, right? We're on the side of women. Oh, oops, except we're not. If you're a young, attractive woman, God help you. We're going to make up all kinds of rumors. If you are a young female athlete, God help you. We're going to let men compete against you. I mean, the Democrats are really not, hate to say it, the party of women. But let's go back to what sort of triggered this. Mr. President, you said you'd rather travel with your aide, Natalie Harp, and build the ballroom than do your job as president. What is your response, John Alta? You mean Pee Wee Herman? Pee Wee Herman lookalike? No, I would much rather do other things. It's a, we're building a great facility here. We're fixing a White House that hasn't been taken care of. You can look at this. This room was a disgrace for the White House. This was a disgraceful situation, the Oval Office. And it was, it was let go. The whole building, the White House was let go. The exteriors were falling apart. The columns were falling apart. The whole place was a mess. In addition, they've been trying to get a ballroom for the last 150 years. And when I said I was going to build a ballroom, the military asked if they could see me. And they say, sir, we have an opportunity to go down deep into the ground and build a military facility to go to the White House and to go with all of Washington. Washington, D.C., which would be so valuable. And then they came up with the drone port on top, which would be a major drone port to protect the White House and all of D.C. And all of those things added up, and it became much more than just a ballroom. And I said to myself, "Wow, what an opportunity." I mean, if I was just going to build a ballroom, I could have had it built very quickly, because I do these -- I build very well and very quickly. We went five stories down into the ground. We did a lot of tremendous things for the military, things that they could never get. They said, "This is an opportunity that we have, because you're building the ballroom, that if you would be willing to, spend more time. We would love to be able -- we've been trying to do this at the White House for many, many years. And they've been trying to have a ballroom at the White House for many, many years. Now, what happened is, we used to use tents. And the tents are usually made of either plastic, a plastic material, or canvas. And they wouldn't stop a.22 caliber. They wouldn't stop anything, in terms of safety. It would be very dangerous. And they haven't used a tent for years. They haven't had any big -- like, we have President Xi coming on September 24th or so. I think it's September 24th. And we'd love to have 2,000 people coming to dinner and celebrating a nice evening, et cetera, et cetera. But we only have a room that's going to hold 89 people, and 89 people is not appropriate. So maybe more importantly, it's totally secure with bulletproof windows, bulletproof sides. It's drone-proof. It's missile -- every -- at the top of the line. And we need it, and especially with what's happened, unfortunately, to -- Okay. So he's giving a very, very big defense there of the ballroom and the security needs for -- I mean, for goodness sakes, look what happened, right, at the White House Correspondents' Dinner. So that really shouldn't be in dispute. He's calling on the Supreme Court to give the AOK on that ballroom. But, you know, that was sort of what had just come before the reporter came back in. And, by the way, remember what was going on? You had the young 10-year-old kid who had been rescued by that hero lifeguard. And you had the young 10-year-old kid who had been rescued by that hero lifeguard. So it felt like very, very, very inappropriate conversation. And that's why he just kind of lost it on her. Really, really lost it on her. But don't forget, this is the original sort of thing that got dangled out there by this jerk of a senator from Georgia saying stupid stuff. And it has backfired hard. He is trying to justify it now. He's not doing a good job at it. But this is what he said. See, he doesn't want to do the job. No, no, no. He wants to build his ballroom and travel with Natalie on their apparently defenseless flying palace gifted by the Emir of Qatar. So there is Steven Chung who's been responding to this. He is the director of communications at the White House. And I have to be careful what I say here because this is live and we're on YouTube. And I can't use language like this or I'll get in trouble. John Jackson. But even she's like, OK, well, I wasn't reporting that. Like our reporting didn't show what he's insinuating because he's just a jerk. He's a jerk and he's a jerk to young women for insinuating such things. Here's Maggie. Look, we reported in our book that she is completely devoted to Trump. She left letters in his personal spaces during the campaign, one of which said, you are all that matters to me. She, you know, her interest in him and those letters alarmed the Secret Service at the time. As we reported, Trump has told people around him that, you know, she's the only staffer who loves him as much as his wife and children. You know, that you'll all go off and leave me and make money and she'll never leave me. She's a taxpayer paid staffer in the White House. So, you know, I'm not going to get into what Ossoff insinuated about her. That goes beyond our reporting. But it is certainly legitimate to ask about staff in the White House. OK, it went beyond your reporting. You don't want to get into it. Of course, you don't want to get into it because, well, she could sue you for libel for starters and she should sue Ossoff for libel. What a jerk. OK, but so what? She likes the president. I mean. If you've got a bunch of staff on your team, you don't want somebody who actually likes you. I think she actually feels kind of how do I say this, maybe even indebted to him because it's thanks to him and his policy. That she's alive to begin with. She had bone cancer. This poor woman had bone cancer. OK. And one of the reasons she liked Donald Trump and wanted to work for him was because his policies enabled her to get the treatment that she so needed. Here she is back in 2020 talking about it. Natalie Hart. Thank you, Mr. President. You know, we all know the story about the Good Samaritan. But what you don't know is I was that forgotten person on the side of the road, the victim of medical error. The number three cause of death under the previous administration and left to die of cancer. First, the medical establishment, they came by and they saw me there. So they wrote prescriptions for opioids and they walked on. Next, the political establishment, they saw me there and they stopped just long enough to come over and tell me how to die, how to speed up my death so I could somehow die with dignity. But then an outsider, my good son, my good son, my good son, my good son, my American, President Donald J. Trump, he saw me there and he didn't walk by. He stopped. And for every single one of us, he gave up his own quality of life so we could live and work and fight with dignity because he believes in survival of the fighters, not the fittest. And so Mr. President, I have to say you have made a lot of promises to us and you have kept every one of them. So now we're going to make you this promise. Just as you fought for us, for God and America, we'll never forget how you saw us on the side of the road and you walked over and you picked us up and you made us great again. And now we're going to fight for you, Mr. President. God bless you. So she's alive because of him. She comes from, it's my understanding, a very religious, very Christian family, and she may actually feel some religious spirituality here. In other words, she was afforded a chance at life thanks to this president. So yeah, she's a young woman who works for him and feels very grateful to him and grateful for this opportunity to work for him. So that's that. And John Ossoff has to say weird stuff because he's a weird guy. Unnecessary. Okay. Unnecessary. I realize you people are all freaking weird. Like they're weird, honestly. Like their whole pregnant man emoji stuff. Weird. Right? Their deviance is weird, but don't put your weirdness onto us or a nice young woman who's trying to do a good job in the White House, for goodness sake. So what if she likes her boss? So what if she feels like a, a higher meaning to what she's doing? She should, for goodness sakes. Wouldn't it be great if we all felt that way about our jobs? I mean, I know I do. Here I am coming to you live from the UK, for goodness sakes. If there's wifi, you know, I'm here. Why? Because I love my job and I do feel a higher purpose in it. You know, like you guys know, I mean, especially those of you here in the early days when we had like five people tuning in, I do this for a reason. She does her job for a reason. So what you twisted twerp, peewee Herman, whatever the hell you're doing. They want to call you. I think peewee's pretty good. Listen to him trying to back off on MSNBC. He's sort of like, oh, well, you know, we are at war. Okay. That's how you're going to justify it. Take it away, Johnny. Why'd you decide to invoke Natalie Harp specifically in that speech? Well, Jen, thank you for having me. And here's the point. We're in wartime. The commander in chief has mired us in this geopolitical, disaster. People have lost their lives. Our naval logistics are frayed. The global energy system is in crisis. And he retreats into this bubble of West wing aides who are his security blanket to make him feel good about himself, to reassure him that he's doing a great job to help him while he designs his new ballroom. And he adorns the oval office in gold. And picks the interior decorations on this new luxury flying palace he received from a foreign prince. Wow. Just for the record, inflation's actually abated massively, massively. And in fact, even if we were to look at gas prices, Fox actually put out a report on this national gas prices. I think we're up six cents versus, you know, a few months ago. And we're actually down from this time last year. Believe it or not, I was kind of shocked when I saw those numbers myself. But, you know, Johnny Boy, little Pee Wee Herman has to insinuate really dark stuff. And that brings me to a soundbite I heard on CNN. And this guy, he's coming out in defense. They actually found someone to defend Natalie and women in general from the monstrosity that is John Ossoff. Listen, to this because it's important. They always go to lowest common denominator. And clearly they have a problem. If you ask me, they have a problem with women, especially attractive women. We know the reason that Natalie Harp's name is mentioned. Now, he gets to do this whole too cute by half thing and it's a wink and a nod. Asif. Yeah, Asif. What he's talking about is this longstanding rumor that Donald Trump is having a relationship with Natalie Harp. That's what he's referring to. So this whole Harp thing that the media is now picking up on, it's really consistent. So you asked about how do Republicans feel about this? We've been here before. We saw what happened during the Bush administration, where these were these salacious rumors that Condoleezza Rice was having a relationship with then President George Bush. We saw with Melania Trump having to sue the Daily Mail because they called her an escort. We saw it with Sarah Sanders, Huckabee Sanders, when the comedian Michelle Wolf talked about her ashes being makeup. We've seen this over and over again. The only thing that we've seen over and over again, we've seen this over and over again, the only thing that we've seen over and over again, the only thing that we've seen over and over again, the only thing that we've seen over and over again, the only thing that Natalie Harp has done has been an assistant to Donald Trump. And we've seen over and over again, when it comes to the left, when it comes to Democrats, and when it comes to even media, they are willing to ignore all of these type of misogynistic and sexist remarks against Republican women or those who are aligned with Republican men. That is what this is about. Yeah. I mean, and his point about the media in general being part of that, well taken. I mean, they really, they try to malign women and it's wrong. It's just wrong. And you know, they're all in on it, right? They're all in on it. I mean, listen to some of the comments that they've made over at The View. Do you remember when Joy Behar was going on about the only reason he picked Caroline Leavitt to be the press secretary was because she's a 10? I mean, again, they're always reducing it to that. And it's kind of, it's getting old, but you know what? I got news for ABC and I got news today for Joy Behar. Big, big news. This is just breaking this whole situation with the FCC is heating up. And I'm going to tell you right here, right now, you heard it here first. They're going to lose their case. ABC is big time going to lose their case against the FCC. It just came out moments ago. Disney is suing the FCC over its license review saying the government is trying to squash free speech because you see, the license is about to be revoked by the FCC who has the ability to do this. And I just want to back up for a second because I've worked in cable. I've worked over here, obviously at YouTube streaming, and I've worked at broadcast television. And in broadcast television, there are certain rules that you're sort of supposed to live by, right? And if you're a news organization, you're kind of got to police yourself a little bit. You got to be a little bit fair because you're not allowed to do what say shows like The View do, which is produce amazingly by the news entity over there at ABC. You're not allowed to have that kind of blatant bias. Now you can do that if you're on cable, but you actually can't do that on one of the broadcast networks, courtesy of the 1934 Communications Act. And so the FCC does have jurisdiction. And if you're constantly feeding a whole bunch of garbage that's one-sided, then that becomes something the FCC can take away your license for. So this really isn't about freedom of speech. They would say, hey, you know, as long as you have two sides, but you guys don't do it that way. And also that's not even, I should point out what Brandon is going after them for. We can talk about that in a second. It's the DEI stuff. But you know, Brandon's like these people, they, you know, they, they are very biased. Like how do you consider an organization like this, that is putting this kind of propaganda on the air, not biased. Let's see if I can play this one for you. As long as Republicans are in power in the majority, there will never be accountability. There will never be checks and balances. There will never be oversight. And so if Americans want this to end, want the abuses of power check, they have got to vote Democrats in November. White women, Republicans, I just read a poll that the Suburbans are now voting Republican. That is like roaches voting for raids. You're not voting for Republicans. You're voting for a cult. Remember that. I want Donald Trump to lose, and I don't feel like today's the day to have the economy argument. This is the kind of thing that I, I don't even know what to say anymore. If people still follow this fascist pig, then I don't know what else to say. The 25th Amendment is time. It's time. It's ridiculous. He, it's the bill that would force people to, uh, have ID when they come to vote. Nobody wants it. The Save America Act, which is ironic because it's not, it's really saving his behind. They are the Epstein-File protect, protection party. You'd be comfortable still voting for Graham Plattner if you lived in Maine? They do. I was one of those people, and I said it, if I lived in Maine, I would have, you know, plugged my nose and I would have voted for him anyway. I think that we are in a time of existential crisis. We need to be realistic, and as a Democratic- You need a great candidate. As a Democratic Party, we need to win. We need to get this country back in. You know what to do. Okay, so you, you see, there she is saying, as a Democrat Party, we need to win. It's not like they have a Republican opposite her. So Disney is now saying the reason you guys are suing us, the reason, or rather, the reason we have the license review is because of our opinions on the President of the United States. And so this becomes a freedom of speech, First Amendment issue, but that's actually not the case. The license review, just to back up, is because Disney would only hire people of a certain color. They would only cast people of a certain color. They had all these affinity groups, and I know plenty of people that have worked at ABC and at Disney, and this was a thing, and they were proud of it. And there were plenty of companies that were proud of it, right? This was like in vogue. Well, that happens to be against the law. And by the way, if you're the FCC, then you have an obligation and a duty to protect all Americans. And if this company, aside from their politics, which is obviously quite clear, aside from their politics, if this company is doing that, well, then I think you got a bit of a leg to stand on, and then some. Let me go to what Brennan Carr's been saying about this all along. Here's Brennan Carr talking about him being at the FCC. Yeah, broadcasters are different than any other form of communication, including here. We're on cable right now. Fox News doesn't have an FCC license. CNN doesn't. But ABC, CBS, NBC, those broadcast stations do. And with that license comes a unique obligation to operate in the public interest. And over the years, the FCC walked away from enforcing that public interest obligation. I don't think we're better off as a country for it. But look, President Trump ran directly at these legacy broadcast outlets, and he exposed them to these market forces. And a lot of these affiliate groups said, to your point, we're tired of carrying this stuff. Late night shows, something's gone seriously awry there. They went from going from laugh lines to applause lines. They went from being court gestures that would make fun of everybody in power to being court clerics and enforcing a very narrow political ideology. And Nexstar, as you noted, stood up and said, look, we have the license and we don't want to run this anymore. We don't think it serves the interests of our community. Sinclair did the same thing. So there's more work to go. But I'm very glad to see that America's broadcasters are standing up to serve the interests of their community. We don't just have this progressive foie gras coming out from New York and Hollywood. Speaker 1: So, Speaker 2: you're right. Speaker 1: you're right. Speaker 2: You're right. Speaker 2: So he's right on that issue. And he's right in that he has the sort of scope and ability to go after them in ways that people have just chosen for whatever reason for the last however many decades. They just haven't gone after these networks for these reasons. I mean, and I would argue that it's gotten especially bad ever since Trump came on the scene, you know, 2015, 2016. That's when it really started to become like untenable. And I kept saying, like, why is the media so against him? I mean, you know, you had me at taxes for goodness sakes. I literally like this is what I do in my spare time. I read tax plans. I sat down, I read every single candidate's tax plan beginning to end. And I said, by far the best one here that we've got, the best one for the economy is Donald Trump. So why did they hate him so much? I mean, we've now learned that you had a very effective deep state courtesy of Obama, et cetera, that was really just not going to accept any Republican. And I even noticed that when it came to Trump, I was like, well, he's a Republican. And I even noticed that when it was thought for a brief minute that Ron DeSantis was going to be the Republican that was running against Biden or Kamala, as it eventually would turn out to be, they went after DeSantis quite hard, too, especially on shows like The View. So, yes, ABC's The View has become this sort of arm of the Democrat Party. And you had so many broadcasters in general going down that path. But all that aside, the license, review is actually about the DEI stuff. And this is what he warned them a while back. Do you remember? He sent a letter to Bob Iger and he's like, OK, Bobby boy, you can't. Bob Iger, by the way, is no longer the Bob Iger is trying to buy the Lakers. And it looks like that deal is not going to go through. But, you know, he's got to find something to do with his retirement. Bob Iger, who has now been replaced, was effectively allowing for and Bob before him, I guess he was was he Bob Chaypek was allowing all of these diversity groups and these DEI groups and all of this stuff to happen. That was actually hurting. other people that were trying to apply for jobs so you can't discriminate based on color based on race you just can't okay like it's constitutionally not acceptable so that gives the FCC the wiggle room to go in and this is what this whole thing has been about from the start so again just to get you up to speed now you've got Disney saying that this is really nothing about trying to squash our free speech it's not your free speech isn't quite totally as you know you do kind of have to have both sides on a news program and if you're not going to have both sides on the news program you're classified as entertainment and then there are other sort of very specific rules governing entertainment so that you're not all one-sided over there and then let's not forget the whole reason you're in this trouble to begin with is because you were discriminating so here I'm going to go out on a limb and I'm going to tell you right here right now they're not going to win this they're just not going to win this you can sue all you want Disney keep suing and suing and sue away you will not win speaking of media WNBA WNBA has picked some sides right the media loves the WNBA the WNBA right now has to apologize and apologize fast because it's really losing people after this one out of Atlanta have you been following the story about the mother and the daughter that wore the XXXY t-shirts and they got like kicked out of the game they're in Atlanta they were just coming to support Sophie Cunningham who wouldn't right and this happened let's go to mother and daughter team boy I'll tell you WNBA has egg on their face right now with this one WNBA having to come out and apologize let's listen in and we were we were made to cover up our XXXY shirts at this game wait are you serious yes they gave us t-shirts I for my hearing over time and told us we had to leave and this is for the girl or cover our shirts this just happened where were you sitting uh floor or three row see yeah third row of floor 30 and how much were your seats and we did nothing like we were not we were just sitting there I didn't make signs I wanted to make signs but I didn't I did nothing I did notice during the game on the Jumbotron they put up a woman wearing a shirt that said protect trans rights or something because she was made to zip up her jacket so she also had a zipper jacket but they put her shirt on the Jumbotron I know it's almost like the message was made and they said now zip it up to make it seem like they're consistent but they never were yeah never and why did you spend so much on tickets why was it important to be here to support Sophie Cunningham and to support women and women's sports because it's just common sense and what's the relation here that's my daughter and are you an athlete I used to be until I had a bunch of knee surgery what sport I did all sorts here I did soccer I did yes and did this issue ever come up like did a biological man ever try to play against no we're from here so it hasn't happened here a lot but I can't believe that just happened in Atlanta Georgia yeah right in Atlanta Georgia of all places Georgia oh that's where that awesome guy's from anyway um the WNBA is now admitting that security was wrong that security should not have asked the mother and daughter to cover up their xx and xy athletic shirts you know I have a feeling this woman who's running the WNBA she used to run Deloitte and Touche the accounting firm and let me just say like running a bunch of accountants is probably vastly different than running a bunch of female basketball players some of whom are like superstars like Caitlin Clark this lady doesn't know what to make of Caitlin Clark or Sophie Cunningham they're like such headaches for her right because they're stars and you don't really have stars in an accounting firm so she doesn't know what's hit her and now she's like oh and now everybody's worked up about trans athletes so you better believe they are because like this is not fair right you cannot have men playing ball against women I mean please so anyway the uh Atlanta Dream put this one out on x the Atlanta Dream believes in creating a safe and inclusive environment for everyone unfortunately at last night's game WNBA security took actions that fell short of that standard and at no point was Dream personnel involved in the decisions oh I see this this is like not our fault not our fault no no we we had nothing to do with it WNBA wasn't involved in this oh don't blame us shouldn't have happened don't blame us boy are they in over their heads the league in not involved in the decisions made by WNBA security the league issued this statement earlier today the WNBA is aware of interactions of at last night's game in Atlanta in which fans were asked by league security to cover their shirts this should not have happened you bet it shouldn't have happened okay I think you know they need to start looking for a new CEO of this league the sooner the better this woman is so pun intended out of her league okay out of her league she doesn't know how to manage any of this I mean she's get stars like Sophie out there who's just saying some normal stuff here she is just telling ESPN and everything implodes over this one Sophie defending women saying to ESPN I got a lot of negative feedback about me hating trans and I'm like I never once said that I think that I am here to extend love but I also think that with love is truth being honest and I want to protect young girls in a locker room or young girls in a sport who shouldn't have to go against biological men shocker I mean wow that crazy girl Sophie Cunningham saying something like that everybody's all upset come on I mean people this is just this is so stupid we talked about this in the beginning of the show today the beginning being that even the smart people if there are any left in the woke thing is absolutely bonkers I mean when you got AOC trying to distance herself from it because you think it's fine it's okay for men that would be in the NBA to be playing women in the WNBA please come on I mean for goodness sakes even Caitlyn Jenner knows this even Caitlyn Jenner right famous athlete I'll never forget my Wheaties box as a kid I'll never think about Wheaties in the same way anyway I digress even Caitlyn Jenner saying you know what you got to defend girls here you got to defend women watch xx you're in xy you're out it's that simple and I think are doing a good job just to show the WNBA how the hypocrisy that's going on here we have to protect women's sports I have been coming on this show for years and years I want to protect women's sports right title nine was one of the greatest legislations and it was over 50 years ago for women's equality it happened to be in sports but look at what it's done for women's sports I don't want that to be ruined by letting biological men come in and play in women's sports you know xx you're in xy you're out you can go play with the men yeah okay so go play with the men and be done with it I mean for goodness sakes it's really it's all pretty darn stupid um just really really darn stupid you know uh Cantor is saying hey I'll go play and we're like you know please well you know let's see what the WNBA does then the WNBA doesn't know what end is up because it can't handle this onslaught of attention well if you can't handle the attention you know what then you really and I go back to the CEO on this you're not ready for this job you're just not ready you should know what you're going to say I mean this former NBA star right saying hey I'm in I'm in after careful consideration and reviewing the current eligibility I'm officially declaring myself a WNBA prospect I mean this is this is great it's funny I mean I know it's a joke and he did this about a week and a half ago but you get it right like it's gotten to the point where it's so bonkers and these people are saying such crazy things that you know he's like sure why not I'll give it a shot let's listen to him hey now listen to me very carefully so far I have spoken with two former NBA players three G-League players and three European players they have all said that if the WNBA won't change the rules we are ready to join the movements and we are considering coming out as women and putting our names in the 2027 WNBA draft hear me out the NBA G-League pays players forty five thousand dollars a year while the WNBA top players earn 1.4 million dollars those men could earn an extra one million three hundred and fifty five thousand dollars a year by just identifying as women rules are rules okay I mean he's right the whole thing is so stupid so it gets back to this really not very smart there she is woman from Deloitte and Touche they really should have stayed in Deloitte and Touche you really you know accountants they're so predictable these basketball players you know they're not and now you get to deal with the media and now you get to deal with whether or not men should be playing against women in sports? I'll tell you the short answer to that is no, but no, they have to think about it. That's the hilarious thing. They have to think about it. So what, you're going to just suddenly invite the whole NBA to come play against your WNBA players? What has happened, right? What has happened to this world? It has gone full on, totally, utterly crazy, just utterly crazy. And this is why it's so important right now that actually sensible people stand up to the commies, to the nutjobs, to the jihadists, to all of these people that are trying to take control of this country. Please make sure you subscribe. If you haven't, do me that favor. And if you haven't gone over to 76 Research, I actually saw one of you guys was saying, who was it? Maybe it was Cat Crazy Sam was saying he was glad that he has all the stocks in my portfolio as American Resilience, Inflation Protection, Income Builder, because it's kind of helped keep his portfolio sane in these turbulent times. So I'm glad to hear that. I always appreciate that feedback. I'm glad that we have been of some help to you. Those are my three portfolios. Please check them out at your leisure at 76research.com. Thank you, as always, for being here. I know it's early. We'll be back at home base, of course, next week. I can't wait. Like, I really and truly can't wait. You know, I thought all this traveling would be interesting and good and I'd get lots of color and good reporting. And I have been able to do that. And I have talked to a lot of people in my travels, which really helps to inform me in all the commentary that I'm bringing to you and had some good time with my family as well. But I cannot wait to get home. I really can't. And not just because of the cozier sheets. Use my discount 20% off. Code Regan. All right. I will see you guys tomorrow right here live on the Trish. Show and on Spotify, of course. Until then, have a good one. Thank you.