Dan Bungino delivers a sharp critique of liberal media narratives and Democratic political strategy in the lead-up to a critical midterm election. He argues that progressive leaders and media outlets are engaging in deliberate misinformation campaigns to distract voters from deeper issues like immigration, crime, and economic policy. Bungino highlights the hypocrisy of outrage over political ads while ignoring serious misconduct by Democratic figures, such as support for the Muslim Brotherhood or aggressive campaign rhetoric. He emphasizes the dangers of liberal policies like open borders, defunding police, and packing the Supreme Court, which he claims threaten national stability and constitutional values. In contrast, he praises the Republican Party for upholding constitutional principles, peaceful resistance, and accountability. He warns against relying on flawed polling data, instead urging voters to base decisions on regional realities and factual outcomes. Bungino points to specific examples of absurd or misleading statements by Democratic candidates—such as anti-sports rhetoric or ill-conceived immigration claims—as evidence of a broader campaign of confusion and misinformation. He calls on undecided voters to reject emotional appeals and instead focus on tangible results, asserting that the Republican platform offers a more stable, responsible, and constitutionally grounded alternative. Ultimately, he argues that regional dynamics and grassroots activism, not national polling, will determine the election’s outcome, and that voters must act decisively to safeguard their communities.
[music] All America, all the time. On the side of freedom and liberty, your voice of hope and truth is here. The Bungina Report PM. With Dan Bungino. Nope, nope, no way. Not a chance. Why would you start a show with a negative? Because I'm not doing it. I'm not doing it. Well, doing what? I'm not falling for this again, folks. I'm really sorry. For those who may have fallen into this trap, I'm not falling for it. Well, what trap do you speak of, then? producer James, you hear we're all supposed to be outraged about the Vivek ad in Ohio. We're supposed to be outraged, Jim. We're supposed to be outraged, crappin' our diapers, cleaning ourselves, we're supposed to be outraged. We're supposed to be sitting there, clawing at our faces, foaming at the mouth, screaming and barking at the movie, because that's a, there you go. That's who we're supposed to be outraged. I'm no, no, I'm sorry, folks. I'm sorry, I'm not doing it. I'm not even, I don't care about any of that. There's nothing. Dan, I can't believe you're not outraged. We're gonna call the radio station. Knock yourself out, bro, have fun. Let me tell you how many I give. Zero. You've got a group of liberal folks out there now. From the podcast space, The Candidates for Office, that support the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood, have apologized for 9/11, said, October 7th, rapes and murders don't matter. You've got audio coming up today, receipts and coming. Of a podcaster saying, we should be firing our pistols at vice presidents. No, yes. You've got people still, after President Trump has been shot, there have been multiple assassination attempts, threats every single day. You've got people still getting arrested for trying to kill and engage in violence on Republicans. And I'm supposed to, just to be clear, if the media, the liberal activist, media, narrative is true, Jim, and we're all following along at home. Me and you were supposed to be sitting here in the studio, I, as my mother-in-law would say, I cannot believe it. And I can't believe this. No, I, folks, I don't care. You're not doing, I'm sorry. You can tell me, nothing you say matters to me at all, you have zero credibility. You do not care about a Candidates mother appearing in an ad in Ohio, if you're in the liberal media. Please just stop, stop the silliness, stop the stupidity, stop the act, everyone knows you don't care. Everyone knows you don't care about the Ilhan Omarqa. I can't believe this happened so close to an election. You can't believe it. You asked Todd Blanche the question yesterday, he described to you why exactly it happened and what you still don't like the answer? You know why, Jim, you know why they don't like the answer? Because their principles are all about like they, you should not conduct an investigation close to a police, Jim's like, no, no, a timeout. He's like, I wasn't there like the Trump thing, Jack Smith. No, no, that never happened. That was Si or something. Then where was the media outrage? Oh, that's right, there was none. You got a party right now. And we believe we have all the audio when coming on the show, so go nowhere. In case you think we're making this up, we got senior figures in the Democrat party talking about defunding the police, talking about war on the Second Amendment, talking about destabilizing the country and causing instability. We got Hillary Clinton talking about packing the Supreme Court, which would destroy our entire system of checks and balances and our three branches of government. Openly talking, it's not, it's not hidden microphones. It's just them advertising their tyranny. And I'm supposed to be upset just to be clear that a congresswoman who retains the presumption of innocence according to our constitution, which everyone should. But who's been accused and their allegations of very serious crimes? I'm supposed to be outraged after you tried to bankrupt President Trump, took a mug shot of President Trump, civilly sued him in a case with no victim. After you raided his house, you attacked his family, we're supposed to be upset about this? No, I know what you're thinking right now. Oh, come on, Dan, it wasn't another thing on President Trump. I mean, he's not really a target. I mean, he was only shot once, Jim. I mean, come on, it's only shot in the head of one, I mean, the second time they caught the guy, I mean, you know what, Adam Pompey, so okay, you know, whatever. Oh, really, here's a news report from just the last couple days about more violence directed at President Trump. But yeah, I'm supposed to be upset about an ad in Ohio. Oh, sure, okay, check this out. And Alabama woman has been indicted for allegedly threatening to kill President Trump after he announced an early October his plans to attend the Alabama Georgia football game scheduled for October 10th in Tuscaloosa. The FBI claims on October 5th, just five days before the game that Megan Utsp posted this disturbing statement on Facebook. He's not allowed in my stadium. I'll pull a bullet through him if he dares. In the post, you can see a photo of Trump who ended up not attending the game because of weather. It's unclear whether Utsp had access to a gun, but the FBI said it discovered a TikTok video showing her at last year's game between Georgia and Alabama. The indictment comes just days after a Kansas man was arrested roughly 48 hours before President Trump was set to speak at a rally in Wichita, only 20 minutes before where that suspect lives. The Alabama charges are signed that law enforcement is taking no chances after repeated attempts against Trump's life. Listen, you know, again, we mess around a lot on the show and there's a lot of humor. There's none of this is even remotely humorous. I think that's self-evident. Oh, well, what would you note, Dan? Folks, again, for my critics out there, hey, you're always welcome, you know, I enjoy a bit of healthy back and forth. I was a secret service agent under Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama. So you're not gonna lecture me with traveling around the world's hot zones, with presidents I thoroughly disagreed with, risking my life and my family. You're not gonna lecture me about, what do you know about this stuff? What do you know about this stuff? Why does this keep happening to President Trump? Because folks, this stuff is not condemned on that side of the aisle. You've got a podcaster. I'm gonna play this coming up for you, so please don't go anywhere. And by the way, a very popular one. I'm not talking about some random woman out of nowhere. I'm talking about firing pistols at the vice president. This stuff is celebrated on the left. It is roundly, totally, completely condemned on our side. You are on the better side of this moral argument. There is no question about that. You go on a conservative show and talk about how you wanna kill political people, fire pistols at them, or other things like that, because you disagree with them, that's your done. Number one, you're probably gonna get a police investigation, which should happen. You're not allowed to threaten public officials' lives. But second, you will be on a PNG list. You know what a PNG list, any of you FSOs foreign service officers or others? You are on the persona non-gratalyst. You will never ever be welcome back. Why? Because we don't do this on the right. We believe in process. We believe in the constitution. We believe in this great country and its history of peaceful resistance. We don't do this stuff. You are on the right side of this and you should be damn proud of it. I don't usually get too annoyed about things the liberal media writes about me because you just spend your whole day annoyed. But I will tell you this. I am not in any way a litigious guy. People say stuff all the time and I usually just let it go. But you ever accuse me and my show of inciting or promoting violence. I promise you that I'm going to make that. I'm going to make that the topic of the show. I'm going to humiliate you. They're going to show out there that stood against this crap more than us. Tell me someone on the left speaking out about this. Folks, I'm sorry. Like that's why I opened up the show today. I'm not going to spend a moment of my time telling you to be outraged by an ad some people consider distasteful in an Ohio governor's race when the Democrats for decades, decades. Jim and I are old man, we're both above 50. You know how many ads I've seen? Republicans want Jim Crow, but Jim Crow back. Did you miss the civil rights fight in the South that was led by, that's right. Republicans, did you miss that? Go try AI, try like chat GPT or something, you freaking idiot. Add some Republicans want to drag black men through the street. The media's like, oh, this is great. We love this. And then they run it in and we're all supposed to sit here and waste time. Folks, you may say you're wasting time in it. No, I'm not. I'm pointing out to an op going on right now with a bunch of liberal media people that two weeks before an election are trying to distract you from the devil.
Democrats, open borders, bring violent crime back, defund the police, inflation agenda, that had packed the Supreme Court, packed the U.S. and this is nothing more than a distraction. There's been no better voice, no better voice for the Republican Party than Caroline Levin. Caroline Levin is a, she's really a savant at this. I mean, she was barely 30, I think, when she got into the White House for this position and everyone expected former White House press secretary Levitt, not us, he and Jim had known her before. We had her on the show when she was a candidate and she was amazing, but almost everyone expected her to fail. Folks, she was almost savant like in her ability to just completely wreck and own media people who were like twice her age. Maybe listen to the show, but you don't like me. Okay, fine. You don't have to like me. You know, part of the job isn't being liked, it's being right. But maybe you like Caroline. Here's Caroline laying out the stakes in an excellent media hit and I think she's right. I think the Democrats are worried. You know why? I've seen the Florida early voting numbers. They are apocalyptic for Democrats. Yes, Democrats, check this out. Common sense Americans across the country, Sean, that's what this really is about. That's what's at stake in this election. More livelihood, our way of life and get reminding them to get out and vote. And so you look at the polls. I think there is definitely reason for Democrats to be worried. Look, we know history is not on Republican side, but President Trump has a way of defying history. And if we listen to the polls, he wouldn't have been in the Oval Office not once but twice. So ignore the polls, ignore the doom and gloom and get out and vote. Folks, the only reason I'm even again bringing up the Democrat media, the liberal activists sometimes communist media, is we have just over a week now, the early voting is going on now, but until there's going to be a decision about the future of this country. I promise you this is not the last distraction attempt. You are going to see more of this. They're going to try to distract you because they know the Democrats are running the single worst slate of candidates I have ever seen in my life. Jim, serious question. I'm not jerking around. Have you ever seen a worse slate? No, no. I can't believe these people are even contending. I mean, I just remember being a kid, Mondale in, it was at 84, running on like, I'm going to increase your taxes. This is the economy was booming, thinking like who told this idiot to do that? But that wasn't like down, they had some semi-respectable candidates down ballot. I have never seen a slate of losers and zeros, like this said Troy Jackson, formerly Graham Platner, a Muslim brotherhood dude in Michigan, 67 genders, vegan guy in Texas. I have never, Dari, at least a shavoo, yeah, well, you know, a full-bone communist. I have never seen a worse slate of candidates in my life. That's why they're doing this, telling you, telling you, ordering you, patriots, ordering you, American patriots, what, what you should be paying attention to. More on this exact topic, including the insanity of people like AOC, being the top of the totem pole of your party. That's why they wanted to strike you. Coming up next, we'll be right back. Folks, these weight loss injections are everywhere, but here's the catch, about 15% of users quit because of the cost, another 15% stopped because of side effects. A while back, I had to drop some pounds, I had a bit of a health crisis, as you know, and I had some really bad knees, so I had to lose some weight. I wound up losing over 30 pounds with lean, here it is, lean from brick house nutrition. It's an absolutely terrific product. The shots weren't for me, it was a hard no. I chose lean from brick house, and here's why. Weight loss shots worked by helping control blood sugar and appetite, so you eat less. There's no arguments, these injections work for a lot of people, this wasn't my thing. So lean was doctor formulated to do similar things naturally. Lean helped tackle my hunger and help support energy, steady energy without constant cravings, and lean did something the injections don't. It helped my body turn fat and energy, so I burned fat instead of storing it. My favorite part, lean is a nutritional supplement, not an injection, no prescriptions, no needles. I lost weight with lean, I feel a lot better, so to my knees. Lean, again, is a nutritional supplement, not a shot. I lost weight, I believe you can too. Go to brickhousenutrition.com/dan, use promo code Dan for 20% off. That's brickhousenutrition.com/dan, promo code Dan. These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA, the products are not intended to diagnose, treat cure, prevent any disease, it's not a substitute or alternative for care from a healthcare provider. Thank you. Lean, check it out, and yes, it does work, and people who send me emails. There are people out there, some of you listening to the radio program today, and then it's okay to be angry. I get it. Maybe a specific one issue vote, you really care about more than others. That has not happened to the degree you wanted it to happen. So I understand, I get it, I feel you, I totally get it. But I want to make the case to you today, with a week to go until the most critical midterm election, possibly in our lifetime ever, because redistributing is going to come up, and the things the Democrats are threatening to do if they win from packing the Supreme Court, opening the border to comparing our ICE agents to the Ku Klux Klan, believe me, I got audio coming up later. We always bring receipts, are so dangerous and destructive that if we were to lose this midterm election next week, we're in a world of hurt, we're in a world of hurt. The damage control is going to be like not band-aids, but like metal stitches. So even if you're not voting for something, say your take on it is my specific Republican congressman or senator or my senatorial candidate, my state, isn't great. Therefore, I'm going to sit home, not vote or maybe consider voting Democrat because I'm angry at this thing. I want you for a second to redirect that anger at the appropriate party because I promise you have every right to be angry if you're Republican candidate for the ballot has not been terrific. But you also have an obligation to be angry, to protect yourself and your family at the people who are causing your problems. I say this all the time that Republicans may not be the solution to all of your problems, but the cause of all your problems is most definitely the Democrats. I'll bring this up a couple of times during the show today, but voting by negation is like marketing by negation. And you know, you don't want to use negatives in your marketing. You never want to tell anyone buying your product, whatever it is, cable TV back in the day when people still did that before apps. You still have to get the cable. Remember, Jim? You have to come to your house, the cable guy, I don't even do that anymore. Everything's an app now. Right? Don't over the internet. You don't market a product by what it isn't. You market a product by what it is to sell it to people. I can make the case to you that in politics, sometimes marketing by negation is almost more effective if what you're running against is so genuinely awful. This will be a theme of today's show. So I'm talking to the people today who are on the fence about voting and are angry and upset. I understand maybe what you wanted to happen didn't happen quick enough, but it's happening now. Maybe it still hasn't happened yet. This is for you. I am not voting to re weaponize the government with a bunch of Democrats who are going to use and abuse their positions to clog up the next two years of your life with the China threat, the threat of, of, you know, nuclear annihilation by hypersonic missile, the threat of a massive AI, SI strike against our industrial control systems and water supply. I am voting against people that are not going to focus on those problems and are going to focus on endless weaponization of government, the impeachment of Donald Trump, the impeachment of Pete Hague Seth, the impeachment of Cash Mattel, the impeachment of John Rackliffe, and the list goes on and on and on. There is a limited number of floor time up on Capitol Hill. They're not even in session the whole time. The House and Senate, they don't work 40 hour work weeks like you. They're back in their district, a huge chunk of time. So in that floor time, do you want to focus on affordability, maintaining the current safer streets program under the president, maintaining a safe and secure border, or do you want to waste your time impeaching Pete Hague Seth? Who would say that? Well, a bunch of Follex Maga, a small group of Follex Maga Republicans are doing that. But here is Democrat Adam Smith, who, if the Democrats win the House, will be the chair of the committee responsible to telling you. I am going to waste your time on a fruitless, stupid impeachment trial, not just against president Trump, but against Pete Hague Seth, too. This is absurd and ridiculous. This is what you should be voting against, even if you're having a hard time trying to figure out what to vote for. Check this out. So, Congressman, if Democrats do kick control of the House of Representatives in one week, you do stand to be a chair of the House Armed Services Committee, these questions you have about Pete Hague Seth, how do you intend to address them? Well, I think we need to thoroughly investigate all of them to be sure, because there's been a lack of transparency at the Pentagon. I think we need to shine a brighter light on it and organize it. So, okay, these are the issues that are most concerning, but then, as you know, right before we left, there was a Republican led effort to impeach Pete Hague Seth, and I think that is definitely on the table. Okay, I'm just using this Democrat Communist's own words. This is definitely on the table. I thought, Jim, they told us they were running on affordability.
they told us they're running on gas prices ironically from blue states were gas prices are the highest in the country due to blue state gas taxes and their restrictive oil and gas development policies again i know in marketing it's never a good thing to tell people you know what you aren't you want to tell people what you are but when the alternative product in the market sometimes the product you're running it's even if you're specific regional candidate is so terrible sometimes the product you're running against is so awful that marketing by negation actually works and in this case it's critical you know a lot of politicians in both parties have failed you but the question isn't who is going to solve your problems the question is who is going to solve or mitigate your problems better the question is a marginal one not a binary there's always going to be problems with inflation government spending the border problems can always exist people want to come to the United States crime problems are always going to exist the questions who is doing a better job so this the d_h_s_ general counsel attorney who works at the department home and security's been interviewed on sixty minutes and this one nuclear yesterday in case you miss this these clips won't viral they were all over the place this is a guy by the name of james personal he's clips are priceless again this is targeted to people out there who are not convinced the trump agenda yet is for them on the fence folks thinking about voting or not voting i'm just telling you that if you stay home the product you're going to get is so awful if i don't highlight it i think i'm doing you a disservice so this for folks who are angry i get you i feel you this is the left wing media arguing again as they always do for open borders and stuff making some of the most absurd ridiculous stupid immature juvenile arguments you've ever heard about why the trump crackdown on a legal immigration basically was like counterproductive hey there was just a small portion of these people who broke the law by the way who went on to break the law again and commit violent crimes this guy personal makes this buffooned sixty minutes look so stupid in this interview this thing was everywhere this morning on x check this out so let's talk about the two crimes that i hear you in others in the administration talk about most murder and rape based on this internal d_h_s_ document in terms first year point five percent of those detained point five percent were accused or convicted of homicide one point four percent were accused or convicted of sexual assault mean together that's that's two percent and isn't it wonderful that we're getting those people out of the country one hundred percent should that be the limit of who has to follow the law just rapists and murderers have to follow the law i take that point but two percent murder and rapist is what we keep hearing this is who's being deported but that's two percent what about everybody else well again i mean so a couple things number one uh. everyone has to follow the law it is not an excuse to say i'm not gonna fall the law because i haven't raped or killed anybody uh. but number two there are a lot of other very serious crimes and there you know one of the things about people who commit less significant crimes is they often commit more significant crimes and i for one as someone who has an obligation to protect the american people i want anyone who could commit a crime who is not supposed to be in this country out of this country because every illegal alien crime is a preventable crime so you're saying someone commits a misdemeanor why take the chance that they won't then you know want to know what i'm well what i'm saying is that we have laws congress passes those laws we just enforce them and this obsession with whether somebody has committed a sufficient crime and immigration judge has ordered us to remove someone we're following an order from an immigration judge i mean what what else could you possibly want to hear so this is just to be clear in this that was sixty minutes right to interview from sixty minutes the perspective of sixty minutes in this the sixty minutes approaches as long as there is just a small portion of these people who already broke the law coming in their country we shouldn't force the law at all if you break the law coming into the country forget about the legal immigrants that follow the law screw them they don't deserve your time we should let them go because only a small portion of turn out to be child pornographers rapists and murderers is it is that i'm just trying to get the thing this is what i'm telling you even if you're angry and you think the republican party is not solved every problem fair enough fair enough fair enough i told you republicans may not be the solution all your problems democrats are the cause of all your problems wouldn't you vote against this kind of stupidity here's another clip from this interview again just showing this myopic image or childish approach to law enforcement you think they would be celebrating Donald Trump's border crackdown and the massive which we will cover today massive drop in violent crime in this country that was even triple digits percentage bigger than even the FBI's latest numbers i'll get to that coming up here's another clip of pure unadulterated idiocy on display and this is it believe me this moron viruses infected the entire democrat party on the ballot now check this out it's on an internal dhs document that we had access to in the trump administration's first year in office for the second term less than 14 percent of people detained by ice had a violent criminal record less than 14 percent so one of the tricks that people do is they use this violent crime label it's an incredibly misleading label there are many horrible horrible crimes that people do not classify as violent crimes let me give you some examples child pornography not getting i mean making it is but watching it is not considered a violent crime trafficking in heroin not considered violent crime so anytime anybody ever feeds you a violent crimes that like that they're absolutely cooking the books to erase the significant criminality and public safety threat that you're looking at that population i appreciate you didn't want to ask i think that is very important yes these people are suggesting that that people who watch child pornography and people who sell heroin aren't people that should be removed from the country because they're not quote unquote violent criminals it's one of the most ridiculous things i've ever heard the sixty-minute position is is what again because this is the liberal democratic progressive candidate on the ballot right now policy that supports open borders that if a hundred people will just use round numbers here would enter the country legally and break the law they have violated law we should not enforce the law against those people because roughly five of those hundred will be rapists murderers and violent criminals and that's by that that numbers but but underselling it by the way because it doesn't even factor in the godaways so that's figure five out of a more rapists and murderers right another fourteen to maybe twenty percent of those are child pornographers slinging heroin drug dealers so you've got about a quarter of these people three quarters who broke the law by entering the country legally could have followed the process and didn't you've got about a quarter of them who are known violent criminals and the sixty-minute policy is the trump close-border policy that is crushed violent crime is somehow a failure folks again even if you're confused about who to vote for and you're you're angry or upset i'm like you some are angry you're upset that listen inflation didn't come down from the by-demonstration highs fast enough i understand i've listen i feel you man i get it i get it my you know my dad was a plumber and my mom worked in a supermarket as i like i grow up from money i get it like i've been there i understand what it's like to not forget paycheck to pay you don't even make it to the next paycheck after i get it all i'm asking you is take that you know righteous anger in many cases and directed in the right spot because there's a party out there that is delusional that deserves to be the repository of this set anger and i'm sorry but it's not the republicans it's just not they are fully behind the border crackdown the crime crackdown the reindustrialization of america this battle against inflation it's not one but it's far better than the by-demonstration i got all the data in coming on the show today i'm going to back this up i promise i'm not asking you to do trust me bro politics those days are done and more coming up next we'll be right back bunch you know i'm just trying to get across to you that in these national elections and i they're not really national elections they're really a series of regional elections an unprecedented number of really stunning results on election night now there are regional interests going on that are going to shock people i'll give you a couple hypotheticals folks there could be a huge upset in the state of minnesota and the michelle to foyer race the republican candidate for the united states senate running against that lunatic peggy flanagan now what's the regional interests it's kind of a national race in the in the in the in the uh. there a lot of fraud happened in minnesota the governor tim walls and lieutenant governor peggy flanagan sorry for stumbling over my words i'm trying to phrase this right that fraud involved a lot of federal programs however the fraud acutely hit it based on like per capita fraud it was uniquely bad in the state of minnesota miniapolis it's a huge regional issue because a lot of neighbors to these new immigrant communities both legal and illegal that were you know folks who lived in minnesota for a long time are really upset that people came into their cities and their states and abuse the system while they're bustin their ass every day getting dirt under their fingernails you know to grind by paycheck to paycheck you could see an enormous upset there that could overcome some national you know wave type election however i have you know i've it's my job to be candid and straight with you the numbers out of
some states for Republicans are not great. They're not catastrophic, they're not apocalyptic. Yes, Republicans do traditionally show up on election day, but to pretend like the situation in South Carolina, a pretty blood-red state is fantastic right now, is not doing anybody any good. It's just not. However, this is a regional race. You've got a guy running for governor in California. I mean, it's fairly obvious they are a deep, deep blue state. We have not seen a real Republican governor there since Ronald Reagan, okay? You haven't. I know you're going to throw out some other, I mean, Reagan was the, I mean, Republican governor that represented our cause. You haven't seen it in a long time. Folks, California, a lot of California residents, I took a trip out there, not that long ago, is at a wedding. I can't tell you how many people, and I was out in the Yattahoe area of the California side, and a little bit up in Napa, it was a wedding for a friend. There are a lot of liberals up there. Everybody I ran into, and I'm biased, obviously, 'cause people who would know where I am, are probably conservative. But even people around them were like, "Yeah, yeah, I'm voting for that Hilton guy." I know we're on a ton of stations in California. There were a lot of people upset at the direction of the state that are not focusing on, I don't wanna say national issues, they are, but their primary focus is saving their community first. You've heard the term, "All politics are local," tattoo it on your cerebral cortex, because it is true. I learned not the hard way in one of the congressional races I ran it. I did. I throw myself under the bus when necessary to make a point, 'cause I lived in. All politics are local. California is being destroyed by homelessness, by drugs, by a fentanyl crisis, by an economy that needs more work, by overregulation, by the fires that destroyed properties, they can't even rebuild. You could see a number of congressional seats in California. If Steve Hilton brings out a large voter turnout for a publicans in California of which there are many, there are millions. You could see some regional upsets that would offset upsets in maybe some red states where some swingy seats might go in the Democrats' direction. Here's an ad by Steve Hilton, that just crushed it. Again, viral, viral, these viral ads are just, they're free-earn media. I've gone one coming up later too with Bruce Blakeman running for governor up in New York against the dreadful Kathy Hoekle. But I'm wanting to listen to this ad. This stuff stings, man. If he can get out a statewide vote of unprecedented proportions at a midterm election in California, it'll filter down to city council seats, congressional seats, dog catcher seats, whatever. But you gotta show up. We've got the numbers. You just have to show up. There is no reason we can't show up like we did in the numbers in 2024. We're there. We still live here. It's the same people. We can do this. All we've got to do is go fill in the bubble, touch the screen, or pull the lever, and we'll win. It's not that complicated. Check this out. Wake up, California. This is a fact. This is not opinion, the DSA is coming. You think what happened in Paris couldn't happen here. You think, have we ever Sarah? It's gonna stand up to the DSA. He'd be a doormat for the DSA. This city is a f***ing disaster. This is fentanyl alley. With Nithia Ramirez there, it'll be fentanyl city. And have we ever Sarah, as governor, and the fentanyl state. I'm your last line of defense. I'm the only one standing in between you and KO. You're gonna put up with another four years of this, because you don't like Trump, because you don't want to vote for a Republican. That is f***ing insane. We've got to change things in California. I'm your only vote. Steve Hilton, for governor, just try it. Folks, this is why I'm telling you to disregard a lot of these and many, not all, but many of these polling outfits that are putting out junk, quote, social experiment. What do you mean, social experiment? Is it a freaking poll or not? Well, we're running a social experiment. Wouldn't lie to people. They're running an op on you. It's not some conspiracy theory. Oh, op, siop. It is an actual siop, psychological operation to manipulate you to stay home, because you believe it's a fake accompli in these races or over, they are not. They are not. Here's another thing I think could lead to some regional surprises. Folks, the Democrats are counting on minority voters, Hispanic, Black voters, Asian voters, to what we would say in statistics, regress to the mean. If you look at the averages and the numbers over time of minority voters in which party they select, it's not a news flash to say traditionally they have voted in large numbers for Democrats. Okay, everybody knows that. However, President Trump turned that around. We did not get a majority of overall minority votes far from it, but we got huge numbers we hadn't received before, the Republican party and this MAGA movement. There is a narrative out there driven by social experiment pollsters and elsewhere, running an op on you, that it's a national election. Forget about regional issues. Everything's lost, the Republicans stay home. Look, all minority voters that have traditionally voted for us are gonna like come back home. That's not their home anymore. Even the dreadful Chris Cuomo, who the guys that obsessed with me on X, it's like the most bizarre thing I've ever seen. I saw this guy at a UFC, he was like kissing my ass. Hey buddy, come on my channel. There's a lot of questions. I think going on there. Oh my gosh, it's freaking weird, man. Like boiling bunny stuff. I think I like security outside the house or something. Here's Chris Cuomo. He interviews this minority black voter in Michigan. And he doesn't get the answer. I think he thought he was gonna get. Again, this is one interview I don't want to extrapolate from this a big, huge national trend. I'm just trying to make the point to you that in the past there was probably upwards of a 90% chance. If you interviewed any random black voter, they would tell you the opposite that they're voting for Democrats. That's not what's happening anymore. And I'm not sure there's gonna be a regression to the mean. I'm not sure there's gonna be a coming home of minority voters 'cause they don't consider it their home anymore. Here, check this out. Who are you voting for? Mike Rogers. Why? Because I think that my family and the values that align with conservative people and then also being able to get things done when it comes to all three branches of government is more important. Do you believe people may be wrong if they assume that all black voters will vote for El Sayed because he's considered another brown hair? I think that they are. And the reason that I think that it is because it's a lot of black people that are waking up and realizing that voting Democrat does not necessarily mean that it aligns with your values. I'm not buying the narrative that the Democrat party high taxes, open borders, street crime. In any way appeals to rational maximizers, if you follow the rules of basic economics and the black and Hispanic community, that want this. Folks, it's getting harder to hide this where Republicans are racist, crap garbage, stupid, I want a narrative that's been out there forever in the age of Twitter, TikTok, Snapchat, and elsewhere. Where people can go fact check this with S-I-A-I whatever you call it in live time. It's not working anymore. Remember, these narratives used to be on the nightly news with NBC, CBS, and ABC. And people would believe, oh my gosh, Republican parties full of racist. Now all of a sudden, they can just check it in live time and find out that the entire civil rights movement in the South to combat Jim Crow and slavery was run by Republicans, you guys just look it up. Regional issues, I think, are going to dominate. That's why I think we're going to see some upsets. We're going to be talking on Wednesday, the day after, a week from today, and I can guarantee you, we're going to be talking about a few races. We're like, where in '80s did that come from? I promise, I'll give you another example of what I mean, regional issues. I live in the state of Florida, I'll bring this up again in a couple minutes here 'cause it's important. I live in South Florida, even more important. The joke in Florida is the more South you go, the more North you get. The Northern Florida is the South. Southern Florida is all transplanted people from up north, so that's where that comes from. I love living in South Florida. If you know anything about South Florida politics of which I do, you will know that South Florida has a very densely populated group of Venezuelans and Cubans who escaped the horrors of communism and socialism who don't want to hear from anyone unless they Florida politician like Angie Nixon running for Senate statewide here in Florida, how they're confused if Castro was, in fact, a dictator or not. This is not a hard question. You don't need a cheat sheet. You just need some common sense. You have family members in political prisons. Not that it would be an upset for Ashley Moody, the Republican and Winnah Wooden, but all these predictions and polls that this is a close race. You sure about that? Great gut fell the other day from Fox on the five. Was talking about this socialism scourge and how socialism is basically an education problem. It just is, folks. If you just wanted to educate yourself mildly in this AISI era, you would find out that socialism is the single greatest source of political torture and tyranny.
in modern human history, hundreds of millions starved, hundreds of millions of people killed political prisoners, all you got to do is look it up. He makes a great point here and this is going to resonate regionally with people who've experienced the horrors of socialism. Check this out. But this, yeah, it's an entire movement that in America can only survive on ignorance. You better not crack open a history book or even take a basic class in economics or this, all this stuff falls down, these, you're right, these DSA candidates have no depth, so they don't even expect their supporters to know the difference. And they don't, also, we've got to be honest, when you look at their supporters and you look at a lot of these guys, they don't have a family, they, a lot of them don't work. So the realities of a full life don't like impinge on them so they can have these beliefs. The moment you have kids or you, and I know, of course, or job to realize that socialism is not a doable thing. There are incentives, disincentives, or outcomes, all this stuff. So you can hold onto these beliefs, but only if you're the actual politician, because then when you get elected, you're exempt from the very outcomes you push on the masses that support you. This is why this group of, I mean, to call them radicals, underselling it, communist progressive far-left lunatics running from Tala Rico to Al-Sayed, to Peggy Flanagan and Minnesota and elsewhere. This is why they hate the development of AI so much, because they know it's an instant fact-check feedback mechanism for crazy things. They've been telling people and voters for decades now. Socialism is an education problem. In addition to being a political problem, a murder problem, a jail cell problem, and a starvation problem too, folks do not trust these polls, okay? You saw what happened in Israel. The polls were way, way off yet again. Do not trust these polls. Go out, fill in the bubble, pull the lever, touch the screen. You show up. We have the numbers. We'll win. There is no fancy formula for this. More coming up next. We'll be right back. But you know, if you're undecided in this election cycle, obviously now less than a week from the most critical midterm election, potentially transformative, and I don't mean that in a good way if the Republican Party loses over our lifetime, are you voting based on results? In other words, documented factual data about the economy, health care, education, government regulation, or are you voting on emotions? I know it's the reason I'm even hesitant to ask it is for obvious reasons. You're probably like, well, that's a stupid question. Of course, I'm voting on results. Well, it's not a stupid question, and again, I'm talking to kind of on the fence voters here. I understand if you're a hardcore Democrat, socialism and crushing the economy, right Jim? That is the goal. But your results, the fact that Joe Biden had 9% inflation, which was almost triple the Trump administration's inflation record, that is the point, like you want to cross the economy. So I'm not really talking to you, obviously, free to listen to them. But I'm talking to people who are genuinely confused about what direction to go. I think back to when I was in college, my freshman year at the University of Stony Brook out in Long Island, and I was seeing all these political ads, I've seen these political ads about Bill Clinton and running for office, and in all these things, they were like independent economists, say the Clinton plan, and I really fell for that. Like I thought independent economists, or I was young at the time, I thought that was real. I'm like, I thought in other words, independent economists were actually independent. I, you know, media bias was still new to me. I wasn't as embedded or deep in politics as I am right now. I was kind of, I thought I was voting on results, but, and I didn't vote for Bill Clinton to be clear. But I, it was really emotions, like, wow, I wanted a job too, because I hadn't in fact done the homework on those results. So if you listen to the show, one of the things producer Jim and I pride ourselves on are bringing you actual data points, real data points, like receipts, here's GDP numbers, things we can prove. Here's the number of, you know, federal workforce employees that were let go in a, in a, in a resizing of government. Here's the number of government regulations that were dumped. Here's the number of, of states that accepted Donald Trump's school choice plan in the big beautiful bill. Here's the number of border apprehensions and a number of illegals admitted into the country close to zero. Here are the numbers on homicides, on violent crime that have gone down. So we pride ourselves on results. I try not to get involved, I say often, I like President Trump a lot, but I, I don't let it cloud my judgment. It's, you know, I worked for him and my job was to enact the Trump agenda, you know, in the FBI and his vision on crime and to do it, you know, with using FBI policy and our constitution as a guide mark. But I am an activist for conservative causes now, I was not while I worked in the government, that wasn't my job. And I believe in this, but I believe in results and I don't, I try not to, I say, fall in love with ideas and not politicians. I'm genuinely confused. If you answered that question, you're on the fence in the, say, we'll call it the affirmative, that yes, I'm voting on results and not emotions. How you could even be remotely considering a Democrat candidate for governor, House or Senate. I think if you, I'm not being a tool about it, I mean it. I'm going to put together in today's show for you in the next hour and 40 minutes now plus. I'm going to put together for you a back and forth of what people out there advocating for you to vote Democrat have done to you versus what has happened in the last two years in the Trump agenda. And one of the people out there with the biggest bullhorn is a failure by any measure based on results of a president, Barack Obama. He's out there hollering, screaming, scratching his face, wet in his diaper, screaming, oh, you definitely got to vote for the D. You got to vote for the D. I don't know what D. He's talking about, but I am voting for no D. They, they, they, they tragically hilarious part about all of this is Obama's out in the campaign trail. The most divisive president now granted I get this tilts, he goes, oh, real, well, there are measures of it, but they're hard to categorize of divisiveness. But I think it's a pretty well-founded opinion based on the political ecosystem when Barack Obama was in charge, how people feel about the country and their neighbor, the king, the monarch of divisiveness. He didn't like the rich. He promoted DEI and woke stuff that got white people, you know, the white male patriarch he was the source of all our problems, critical theory, crap, and all this other stuff. Barack, Barack Obama was probably the most divisive president we've seen in modern US history. And his record of failure over eight years is second to none. I know if you're a Democrat listening or even on the fence and you're offended by that. I'm, I'm sorry, I'm just telling you the truth. Barack Obama's signature achievement was his greatest catastrophe, the Affordable Care Act, IE Obamacare, where rates have gone through the roof. They just go ask your SI program anywhere, Gemini, ChatGPT and Thropic, open source, GROC. Your premiums have doubled. That was his signature achievement was increasing your health care premiums, getting your plan canceled. Now he's out there on the stump talking about how we should all be sitting around roast and marshmallows around the campfire singing campfire songs. The only campfire song this guy singing is like right before that camp crystal lake show when Jason was like, that's the only campfire in this guy is it. What the hell is he talking about? Here's Obama out on the trail. This is a tragedy. Telling people he's all about fat Barney, sharing is caring. What the hell is this guy talking about? He spent eight years telling you how bad you suck. You didn't build that. Well, you didn't either. You never had a job. You were a freaking community organizer. Listen to this crap, check this out, and division, and I don't know about you, but I am tired of being angry and I'm tired of being divided. I want friendship and neighborliness and joy and generosity. I want everybody rolling up their sleeves in the common enterprise of rebuilding America. Oh, with this guy, I can't take it. If there was ever a national political figure that needed to just slither away, it's this guy. This is probably the most irritate. I actually prefer Kamala Harris' word salads because they're actually funny. They're quite funny. Like we listen to him and be like, "The pulse goes round and round and the wheels." And don't let the present past unburden you from the future, present of the moment, and I didn't visit the border, but I was the border czar, but I never visited Europe either. You're like, "Wait, what?" But you laugh. Chim and I sit around like, "This is great stuff. This is like Eddie Murphy raw. This is good." Obama's not funny. He's just annoying. He's out there lecturing in his preacher's word. "Where are we? We've got a provoked fat party, sharing is caring, and we should all do some little smores. Take your dark chocolate, your graham crackers, and your marshmallows, and we're all going to sit around."
with those scumbag, evil rich people, Republican, white male patients, why don't you jump? I don't, you just said that everybody, fat party, I don't, you just said sharing your skin. I do share with those evil white Republicans who cling to their bibles and their guns. Like, well, why don't you just say fat party? Why do they always have an accent? Why does he accent all we can? Obama is one of the worst, Kamala Harris is by far the worst, Hillary does it too. I ain't been feeling always tired, how do you know I'm, I did not plan this, I did not plan this routine. He's my partner. Why do they do this? Because they're phonies and they're frauds and they're fakes and they're actors and the Democrats biggest concern. Their biggest concern is this in this election is that on the fence voters are going to be out there doing their homework. What do you mean? They don't want you to look them up. No, they don't. They'll tell you we're running on socialism, socialism's free schools. Socialism is not free schools. Number one, nothing's free. The teachers get paid and when it gets paid for out of your tax dollars, taxation is not socialism. Socialism is the government control, the means of production. The socialist running know that if you have a job, you will in fact work for the government under socialism. That's what socialism is. You can go look that up yourself, don't take my word for it. But you've got candidates running in deep red states like Florida, like this clown running for governor David Jolly, who's freaking gozer the gozerian from the original ghost busters. Remember that movie? I may be dating myself. Gozer the gozerian. He's whatever you think he is. That's why at the end, they're like, don't think of anything. And Dan Acquora thinks of the state push, Marshmallow Mani comes walking. They looks like Fat Barney, except he's not saying and sharing is caring. State puff Marshmallow is like breathing fire and stuff like that. Like, what did you do? I couldn't help it. I was thinking of the state puff Marshmallow. That's David Jolly. David Jolly is run for office as a tea party guy. As a moderate Republican, claims to be an independent. He's been pro-life. He's been pro-abortion. He's been pro-second amendment, anti-second amendment. You're like, who is Dave Jolly? I don't know. He goes to the gozerian. He's just hoping you don't look him up. The Democrats weapon in this campaign is ignorance. They don't want you to find out about El Sayed's Muslim brotherhood ties. They don't want you to find out. Taloriko thinks they should be. Texas should be meatless in Texas. That's the funniest thing I've ever heard. Rudy's, what? The iron fork? There's like everything's iron like in a brisket space, right? Iron spoke, iron fork, fork, iron, iron steel, iron tomatoes, everything's shut them all down. Shut them no more brisket in Texas because Taloriko is there. They're hoping you don't see that clip. You got a guy running in Kansas. This guy running against Republican Roger Marshall. They was a clip they played on Foxless. He's like, hey man, he's apparently some kind of preacher. This is the Democrat. They don't want you to see this stuff. I don't know if you caught this yesterday in Brett Beershow. Jim, yesterday it was amazing. The guy, you saw, the guy's preaching up there, the Democrat running in Kansas. You mean Illinois? No, I mean Kansas, like blood red Kansas. And he's like, yeah, we got to get away from eating so many cows like they fart a lot or something. You're like, wait, what did you, what, this is Kansas, bro. This is, they are praying. You don't look them up. Here's David Jolly running in Florida a state that could, he's growing redder by the minute as disaffected blue state refugees wind up here. Here's David Jolly saying, you know, man, we've really got to take care of these boys and women's sports. Forget your daughters. Let's make sure we get more boys playing with them so they can smash the volleyball and a kill into their face and break their nose. This is a hugely popular police position in Florida. I hope you sense the dripping sarcasm. He's hoping you don't hear this. Well, you'll hear it here. Check this out. They're wrestling trying to resolve it on behalf of all Americans. They're fundamental and constitutional rights. They're respect and they're dignity or you're working to humiliate them. And I think it's been pretty disgusting what we've seen from Republicans in the past several years on this. I look, I don't think we need to knock down that youth soccer player who is working with their family and their doctor on whatever their current, you know, crisis is personally. I think it can be supportive of them to allow them to play in youth sports. That's disgusting, Jim. It's disgusting. Have been asking that your daughter play with other girls and not potentially grown men who are going to smash the volleyball into their face and break their nose. Not only is it disgusting, Jim, he implies in the beginning or just says directly that there's some kind of constitutional right, Jim. You got your pocket constitutions out in there, the Bill of Rights. There's that first amendment thing we've heard about, very important, second amendment, so important. They made it number two for folks. Jim is going through it. Do you see anywhere in the constitution, a right for an individual with a, with a unit hanging between his legs to play in a women's sports game? Is that Jim's looking at? Let's see that. You sure? Yes. Jim goes with a gozerian said it was in there, Jim. You sure it's not there? We'd further. But I know. Listen, I got to take a quick break. It's actually a mandatory break for the show. However, it's a good time because Jim and I are going to research this document called the Constitution or something. It's only like our founding document right there. And we're going to look for the right for kids with units to play in sports with your daughters. We're going to look. If we find it, we'll tell you on the other side of break. We'll be right back. But you know.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Dan Bungino argues that liberal media and progressive politicians are spreading misleading narratives to distract voters, especially close to elections, by falsely portraying conservative policies as extreme or dangerous.
He highlights the hypocrisy of liberal outrage over political ads in Ohio while ignoring major scandals, such as investigations into former Democratic leaders and their support for radical ideologies like the Muslim Brotherhood.
Bungino claims that Democrats are promoting dangerous policies—including defunding police, open borders, and packing the Supreme Court—while downplaying violent threats against President Trump and other officials.
He asserts that Republican candidates, despite being criticized, uphold constitutional values, peaceful resistance, and accountability, unlike the left, which he accuses of celebrating violence and inciting unrest.
Bungino emphasizes that regional issues—like local crime, immigration enforcement, and cultural identity—are more decisive than national polling data, and that voter turnout can override flawed polls.
He criticizes the Democratic Party’s narrative that socialism is inherently good, pointing to failures like Obamacare and rising healthcare costs, and claims that these policies alienate voters with real-world economic concerns.
Bungino condemns the use of misinformation and ignorance in Democratic campaigns, citing examples of candidates making absurd claims about sports, immigration, or religion that are designed to confuse rather than inform.
He urges undecided voters to prioritize facts and results over emotion, arguing that the Republican Party offers a more stable, constitutionally grounded alternative to what he sees as a reckless, divisive, and irresponsible left-wing agenda.
Summary:
Dan Bungino delivers a sharp critique of liberal media narratives and Democratic political strategy in the lead-up to a critical midterm election. He argues that progressive leaders and media outlets are engaging in deliberate misinformation campaigns to distract voters from deeper issues like immigration, crime, and economic policy. Bungino highlights the hypocrisy of outrage over political ads while ignoring serious misconduct by Democratic figures, such as support for the Muslim Brotherhood or aggressive campaign rhetoric.
He emphasizes the dangers of liberal policies like open borders, defunding police, and packing the Supreme Court, which he claims threaten national stability and constitutional values. In contrast, he praises the Republican Party for upholding constitutional principles, peaceful resistance, and accountability. He warns against relying on flawed polling data, instead urging voters to base decisions on regional realities and factual outcomes.
Bungino points to specific examples of absurd or misleading statements by Democratic candidates—such as anti-sports rhetoric or ill-conceived immigration claims—as evidence of a broader campaign of confusion and misinformation. He calls on undecided voters to reject emotional appeals and instead focus on tangible results, asserting that the Republican platform offers a more stable, responsible, and constitutionally grounded alternative. Ultimately, he argues that regional dynamics and grassroots activism, not national polling, will determine the election’s outcome, and that voters must act decisively to safeguard their communities.
FAQs
Dan argues that the liberal media is using the ad as a distraction from deeper issues, such as Democrats' policies on defunding police, open borders, and packing the Supreme Court. He claims the outrage over the ad is disproportionate and politically motivated, not based on facts or public interest.
Dan criticizes Democrats for promoting open borders and claiming that violent crime is low in immigrants, arguing that these claims are misleading. He points to internal DHS documents showing that only a small percentage of detained individuals are convicted of violent crimes, and claims this is a deliberate effort to downplay the risks of immigration.
Dan argues that the ad is a minor issue compared to the broader, systemic problems within the Democratic Party—such as promoting socialism, defunding police, and threatening constitutional rights. He believes focusing on the ad is a distraction from more significant policy failures.
Dan claims that the media and Democrats have been silent or dismissive of threats against President Trump, including multiple assassination attempts and threats to his life. He argues this lack of outrage is evidence of a broader pattern of ignoring real dangers to public safety.
Dan argues that Democrats have a poor slate of candidates, including figures with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood or radical ideologies. He claims these candidates are not only unqualified but also represent dangerous, ideologically extreme positions that threaten American values and safety.
Dan argues that Democrats use 'marketing by negation'—highlighting the failures of Republicans while ignoring their own flaws. He believes this strategy is more effective than positive messaging, especially when the opposition's policies are clearly harmful or far-left.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.