BAR FIGHT | 2 Liberals vs. Michael Knowles | Leftist Blondie & Brian Allen

Okay, fellas, since Hollywood can't do anything right anymore, we did their job for them. The Daily Wire's newest movie is an ode to the great funny action films of the 80s and 90s. Good guys win, bad guys lose. No one apologizes for it. Check out Run, Hide, Fight Infidels, now streaming only on the Daily Wire. Well, some races draw attention, others become the race everyone watches. In Texas, James Tallarico and Ken Paxton are facing off in one of Calchi's most traded midterm markets. Follow the race in real time on Calchi and then trade on the candidate you think is going to win. Each correct contract is worth $1 at settlement. Don't just follow the midterms. Trade what happens next on Calchi. Use code DAILY, D-A-I-L-Y, to get up to $25 when you trade $25. That's Calchi, K-A-L-S-H-I, Calchi. Trade on anything. 18 plus only restrictions and eligibility requirements apply. Event contracts trading involves risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Calchi products are not available in all jurisdictions. Prices, values, and available markets may differ from those mentioned. For more information, see calchi.com slash regulatory. You know what's wild? Most people are still overpaying for car insurance, just because it's a pain to switch. That's why there's Jerry. Jerry is the only app that compares rates for over 50 insurers in minutes, and it helps you switch fast with no spam calls or hidden fees. Drivers who save with Jerry could save over $1,300 a year. Before you renew your car insurance policy, do yourself a favor. Download the Jerry app or head to jerry.ai slash wire. Ever hit a wall in the middle of the day and a third coffee just doesn't do it anymore? Here's what's actually happening. Coffee only briefly blocks adenosine, the chemical that tires you out. When it stops working, your system is flooded and you crash. Modafinil is a works by stimulating multiple receptors in the brain associated with wakefulness, including dopamine, serotonin, norepinephrine, histamine, glutamate, and orexin. It's a more complete solution that gives you 10 to 12 hours of steady focus and energy. Go to mod.com. That's mod.com for a free consultation. And use code dailywire to get 10% off your first order plus free shipping. That's code dailywire at mod.com. You break the law, GTFO. You people are crazy. Hold on. You opposed to the death of a child molester? I, for one, am not opposed to the death of child molesters. Why are men committing suicide more than women? Because of you. Okay. All right. All right. Let's go. That's it. That's the end of the round. Well, welcome to Bar Fight. I'm Michael Knowles. I'm joined tonight by two guests. Our first guest dedicates most of her time to combating the patriarchy online. Please welcome Leftist Blondie. I think we need to all realize, like, we're in a room of crazy people. And now our next guest, he's the founder of Allen Analysis, where he takes on government overreach, corruption, and media bias, a noble pursuit. It's Brian Allen. How it works. We will be debating three of the most controversial topics of our day. The bell rings. We duke it out for that round. And then our friends in the crowd can come up to the microphones to change the topic. If you think the topic's boring and you hate it and you want to talk about something else, that's fine. Or you can pick a fight with any of us. Do not wait. There is a time limit for each round. Anyone who comes up to the mic can win special prizes and a seat at our VIP section sponsored by Redneck Riviera Whiskey. Look at that. Lady, gentlemen, are you ready? Ready? It's time for round one. Leftist Blondie, also known as Anne, kick us off. What is your topic? All right. My topic is the majority of undocumented immigrants are more American than MAGA. What's your argument? You guys don't agree? What? I thought I was in friendly company here. So I think that one, not only do undocumented immigrants contribute to our economy greatly, but they also are notably not as privy to crime as Americans are. Large statistics show that undocumented immigrants are far less likely to commit violent crime, murders, and other types of crime than American citizens are. I think they're less likely. I think they're less likely to support crime than MAGA, who supports a president who has 34 convicted felonies and got off scotch-free, by the way, and didn't have to deal with any of the consequences and got to vote for himself in both elections. He sure is lucky, isn't he? For the worst criminal in the world, he's pretty lucky. He didn't have to go to jail. I would say so. He got to be president. Okay. So you say that they contribute to the economy. I disagree with that, but let's let it be. You say they commit violent crime at lower rates. It's sort of disputable, but I'll let you have that one. You say they commit crime at lower rates. That's not true. They're illegal aliens. But let's put that aside even for a second. In what way does any of that make them more American than American citizens who voted for Trump, who are MAGA? In other words, by what definition of American are the illegal aliens, these foreign criminals, more American than American citizens? Sure. Well, I think one thing that constitutes being American is being pro-democracy and being pro the rule of law as it stands. And I think supporting a violent criminal and a. And a felon as the leader of our country is far less American than somebody who comes in here, is seeking asylum and just looking for a better life and a democratic society to live in for their family and for the future of the country. Now, okay, you mentioned rule of law. Would you say that someone whose very distinction in the country is having broken one of the basic laws of the country, would you say that that person respects the rule of law? If the law is something similar to jaywalking, then absolutely. Do you think national borders are similar to. Do you think national borders are similar to jaywalking rules? Yeah, absolutely. Okay, all right. Legally, they are. But we don't have federal jaywalking laws, right? We don't have federal ticket givers to go around on the sidewalks of America. We don't have massive police forces that have been defended by both political parties for many decades to enforce jaywalking law, do we? Yeah, but there's an underlying assumption that that's the way it should be, that we should be hunting people down on our streets and deporting them in the most cruel ways. and deporting people who are here illegally. You're talking about the jaywalkers or the immigrants? We should not hunt down the jaywalkers. I jaywalked myself. I'm a New Yorker originally. But obviously, the majority of Americans should. So we shouldn't deport people just for crimes? We should deport them for deportable crimes, namely entering the country illegally. Is there another deportable crime? They, uh. Or is this like a special case? It's just like a one-off thing? Or we get to deport people just for this one little thing? There are additional crimes that you can commit that will get you more expeditiously deported, but no, entering the country illegally. Not having a right to be there. That's the sort of thing that gets you deported. And what's the benefit there? What's the benefit in deporting them? What, so they can try to come back illegally again? I thought you said that an American is one who supports democracy and the rule of law. Well, the democracy elected members to Congress who passed a law saying that there's a way to get into this country, certain people have a right, certain people don't. You tell me that that's the definition of an American, and then you throw democracy and the rule of law right out the window when it suits your benefit. Are you throwing democracy and the rule of law right out the window when you jaywalk? Are you throwing democracy out the window when you speed a little bit over the line? Over the speed limit? Well, I think we should also still have speeding tickets. There's obviously tiers to this. I suppose that's true, but you're the one arguing that we should only enforce some laws and not others. I'm saying we should enforce all of the laws. You're the one that's arguing that we should only enforce some laws and not others, because for some reason Donald Trump got to get off on 34 felony count charges of falsifying business records. What's the criminal punishment for the crime that you're alleging? For the, wait, alleging? Yeah. Alleging? Yes. Do you believe that he got a conviction for this? You're saying that. It's not alleged. Michael, it's not alleged. What is the criminal punishment for the crime that you're saying Trump is guilty of? There's things like fines. He could have gotten jail time, but he got none of it. He didn't even get probation. And who determined that? The judge. The judge. Okay. Well, I think that's how our justice system works, so I feel pretty good about it. In the interest of him becoming president. In the interest of not interfering with him becoming the next president of the United States. Ah, I got it. And wait, hold on. Where was the judge? Was the judge in some really red, conservative state? You tell me. The judge was in New York. Does that matter? Which is a pretty blue state. Well, I guess the point that you're making is. So, biased judges, Republicans don't exist in blue states, guys. You heard it here from Michael Knowles. Republicans don't exist in blue states. Do you think the judge in the Trump case was a Republican and not appointed by a Democrat? I didn't say that. Okay. All right. I'm just saying, you made the point. You made the point that he's in a blue state. Well, I guess that means that Republicans don't exist in blue states. I think you're spinning in circles on Trump, and I think you're trying to. I think you're getting off topic, but I think we should. Before we move on, we should get to the point of the main question, which is, are these illegal aliens more American than American citizens? And look, they're just not, right? By definition, they're not Americans. That's right. I know we live in this world where we have to pretend like we don't know the meaning of basic words. We don't know what a woman is. We don't know what a man is. But. Oh, I know what a woman is. Do you? We do know what an American is, and it's an American citizen. So these people literally are not Americans. But let's say we stretch the definition of American into some woo-woo wonderland. Let's say that an American is. Nothing's woo-woo about it. Well, we're redefining something as other than it is. Have I said anything. Can someone tell me if I've said anything woo-woo? I think it's woo-woo in as much as. Anything woo-woo here? They are defined in this context. They're defined by not being American. But let's say, okay, an American is one who contributes to the economy. We know with certainty that about 61% of illegal alien households receive some major form of welfare. That's compared to 37% of native Americans. born Americans. So they take more than native born Americans. Is it that they speak the same language that we do? They're not eligible to receive certain social welfare programs. And yet they do anyway. It's 61 percent. How? Well, I didn't say they receive all of the social welfare programs. I said they receive at least one. Where's that from? The status from the Center for Immigration Studies. What social welfare? Well, it varies by the immigrant household. Do you really do you really have a question about the statistics or are you just upset that I've no, I do. I do wonder what social welfare they're receiving. Is it Social Security? Is it? It can be. It can be. No, not Social Security, though. They also steal that. But it can be. I don't think it can be health care. It can be food. Regardless, let's let's move on to the next criterion. They don't. Less than 60 percent of illegal aliens speak English with proficiency. I never came up with this. I'm trying to be generous. You're arguing with another leftist. I'm trying to be generous to your argument by seeing if there's any way that we can stretch the definition of being an American to include these people. Is it that they've served in the military? They don't. None of them have served in the military. Is it that they contribute to their neighborhoods? They volunteer? No. If you look at all immigrant households, including legal immigrants, they volunteer at about half the rate of native-born Americans. Any way you slice it, these people are literally not American, just by the definition. Volunteer for what? Volunteer to help in their communities. They're not civically engaged at half the rate as Americans are. Are these registered social welfare organizations? Are these? Yeah. Nonprofit organizations, non-governmental organizations. Okay. What's the stuff for that? Volunteering for. It's 15 percent for immigrant households, 28 percent for native-borns. Okay. Okay. And did you know that. Okay. Damn it. Sorry. I don't think I'm supposed to. Do we have any questions over there? It's a bar. You can get a little loose, you know. Yeah. For the panel, first of all, blessed Lent, Mr. Knowles. Good to see you. Thank you. Thank you. So you said that illegal aliens, and I'm sorry, they're not undocumented because they never had documents to begin with. That's what it means to be undocumented is they don't have documents. They are illegal aliens. They're not documented. The point is, you said that. They don't commit nearly as many crimes as Americans. If they commit any crimes while they are here illegally, that's one more crime than there should have been in this country. You understand? So then should we start deporting people who commit other crimes here? Why would we make that. No. You see the distinction. Somebody said yes. Illegally. Wait, wait, wait. Someone said yes. Can we get the confirmation on that? We should deport criminals? So when you go over 10 miles over the speed limit, we should deport you? Get this guy out of here. He said based if we deport the criminals. Yeah, I'm kind of open to it. It depends on the criminals. Well, then we should deport the President of the United States. I'm down for that. I'm so glad we agree. You heard the distinction that he made. The distinction was, look, we got to deal with the criminals who are already here who are citizens, but any single crime that an illegal alien commits is gratuitous, so we could have deported them. And I think that we should lock those people up. Why would we send them back to their own countries to commit crime there and then to try to come back? Well, hold on. I'm answering. Wait your turn. It's okay. Look, why wouldn't we lock those people up and put them through the same. It's the same due process that we do for American citizens. Why wouldn't we deport them before they commit the crimes? Hold on one sec. Why would we send them back to their own countries to go commit the crimes there or to come back again and commit the crimes again here? Well, they got in illegally the first time. Why wouldn't you think they would get back the second time? Right, we should enforce the border, which President Trump did. Isn't this the same argument that you guys give for gun laws? Like, oh, well, we can't take away guns because people will get guns anyway. No, we can take away the open border, and we did under President Trump. If we incarcerate them and not deport them, we are now paying for their upkeep. We are paying for their bed, their food, their shelter. We are not supposed to be doing that with illegal aliens. You cross illegally, you break the law, GTFO. So breaking the law is a sufficient criteria for deportation, is that correct? Yes, it is. So then we should deport the President of the United States. Thank you, sir. What's your name? The President of the United States crossed the border illegally? I don't think so. No, but he committed 34 felonies and was found guilty of defamation of a woman that he raped. He didn't rape anybody. That is slander right there. ABC News had to pay $15 million to President Trump for that exact defamation. So I would be very, very careful of accusing him of r*****. For what specifically? For accusing him of being convicted for r*****. They had to pay $15 million, George Stephanopoulos and ABC News. For specifically the accusation of r*****? Yes. Then why is he paying for denying that the r***** occurred? Huh? How do you reconcile those two things? It didn't happen. Trump was not convicted of r*****. He was charged and had to pay out. Money for losing the case, for defaming her, for denying that the rape happened. There was a civil suit pertaining to various claims of sexual assault. And George Stephanopoulos went on ABC News, the hatchet man for Bill Clinton, went on ABC News as a journalist. And he said Donald Trump is guilty of r***** and was found guilty of r*****. And they had to pay $15 million because that's a lie and that's defamation. And you might have to pay it too, so I'm trying to save you money. Well, he can come for me. I don't have that much. But the problem is my question is still not being answered. And the intelligent people in the crowd will understand this. The question was how do you reconcile those two things where he was forced to pay up after denying the claim about r*****. But also somehow he had to be paid for someone saying that he r***** someone. How do you reconcile those two things in the justice system unless one of those things is corrupt? And then how do you prove that? Because, I mean, the actual short answer of this, though it's somewhat more nuanced, is that there were civil claims regarding sexual assault. But there was no criminal conviction ever. There wasn't anything like r*****. And so the journalists got sloppy, kind of like you're getting sloppy with your language. And they had to pay a lot of money because that's a very serious claim and it minimizes the claims of real victims. So, all right, next question. All right, so first I just want to express support for the longstanding Western legal tradition of exile for crimes. But the question to the panel today is who's more American, the illegal immigrant who's been here 20 years or the H-1B who's been here three? That's a good question. Do we want, Brian, we haven't heard from you yet. Well, I think there's a distinction, right, between a person who crossed the border illegally as opposed to someone who did cross the border illegally but then maybe overstayed their time. Because you guys didn't really dive into the distinction there, right? You said illegal immigrants are people who crossed the border illegally. But there are many people who crossed the border legally but then end up, you know, being undocumented along the way. So there's a distinction there. So I'm going to pose to, you know, to address this question whether or not a person is an H-1B and they're more American than a person who's been here for 20 years. I would say the person who's been here 20 years is more American than a person who's been here for three years. You know, you have been here for long enough to understand the culture, the language, the nuances. You could relate more with the people. Sure, you know, you're not documented, but you understand enough. It's just a minor point. Sure, you're not like technically American at all. So what? What makes an American, Michael? Well, that's a great question. I'm so glad you asked me because in answer to your question, neither of them are American. The illegal alien who's been here for 20 years or the H-1B who shows up so that corporations can get slave labor from India. Neither of them are actually American. And so what makes an American? I agree with you on that. Wait, do you think that somebody, because I have a question because we're getting into this whole thing where American equals legal citizenship status. That's what you believe, correct? I think there's more to it than that, but that's at least a minimal aspect, yeah. Okay, because I think that somebody who has lived here their whole life. Has worked to support the American dream and the American economy and cares about this country, cares about building a family here, which, by the way, more undocumented immigrants and more immigrants overall live in traditional household with two parents in the home, not just one parent, like a lot of Americans tend to do. They're also more Catholic, if you didn't know that, from the southern border specifically. They are overwhelmingly more Catholic. We're still fixing the Protestant problem in this country. Don't worry. We're fixing it. Don't worry. Hey, now, I grew up Protestant. I want to win this round, so I'll cut it out with the Protestant jokes. Sorry, go on. Yeah, but look, the problem is I think somebody who has lived here, who has worked here to support the American dream, who has a family and builds upon this idea that we have of becoming a melting pot and becoming a place where you can literally come from anything is far more American than somebody who sits here and supports what happened on January 6th where they were yelling to hang Mike Pence. Do you support that? I like Mike Pence. I don't want to hang him. No, I don't. Okay, so you condemn the J6ers for yelling to hang Mike Pence. No, I think. I think the J6ers are basically fine, and I think there was a political witch hunt, and I think they rigged the election. Can we get like a yes, sir? If you're asking me to be candid. Yes, sir. Can we get just a. And I think the only person who died in political violence that day was a pro-Trump J6er who was killed by a trigger-happy cop on Capitol Hill. Look, and I think that's unfortunate. Wait, so do you think that that's a trigger-happy moment, but with Alex Preddy or Rene Good, that's not a trigger-happy moment? Yeah, that's exactly what I think. Okay, so people storming the Capitol. Okay, someone driving away from ICE. Not okay. Well, driving. Going to ICE. You're kind of getting the direction a little bit off there. Yeah, I think. She barely grins him. I think that running around the Capitol in a horn hat, you know, with a police escort is not great, but it's not a crime. And forcing the sitting vice president to go into hiding for nearly six hours. But driving an SUV into a cop is not a good idea. Six hours while they called for his death, by the way. The thing you guys accuse leftists of doing. We keep getting off the topic of. Okay, maybe we'll get back onto the topic. But we have to answer a more important question, which is who won that round? Who gets to go sit at the Redneck Riviera VIP table? Was it the first questioner? Raise your hand. Raise your hand. Eh, it was Metz on Metz. It was Metz on Metz. Was it the second questioner? I think it was number two. Sir, enjoy your Redneck Riviera whiskey with your Mayflower cigars, with your beautiful Daily Wire merch. Go pick out one of those cool hats. It's time for round two. - Brian, what is your topic? - All right. So my topic is that America practices strict capitalism for the country's poorest, yet open socialism for the country's wealthiest. Let's get started. And the reason I say that, we could go back as soon as the COVID pandemic, right, during the PPP scam. We had multiple rich corporations, including publicly traded corporations, who were told not to apply, but they still did apply, who raked in millions of dollars from the government. Can I just start out and say, I agree with you. The COVID lockdowns are one of the largest transfers of wealth from the poorer classes to the wealthier classes in human history. I blame the Democrats because they're the ones who shut it down in the States. But on that point, I totally agree with you. So you could agree that the corporations get in $700 billion, right? People like the Kushner family, Yeezy, who are billionaires, walking away with millions of dollars. I think Yeezy got a little bit hit in recent years. He might be a hundred millionaires still, but anyway, he was a billionaire. At the time, he was a billionaire, right? But ultimately, he walked away with millions of dollars from the federal government, but they're rich, right? But you have the future of our country, the students, right? Asking for subsidies for health, for education. And they're told, well, kick rocks, figure it out yourself. It's capitalism. You took the loan, paid off yourself, right? It's only $113 billion we're talking about here. Whereas the corporations walked away with three quarters of a trillion dollars. Now, hold on. Are college students the poorest Americans? That was your prompt, right? The richest versus the poorest? Correct. They are amongst the poorest, but that leads into my broader. Because I thought they had a higher than average earnings potential and expected income than the average American. Earning potential if they finish college, right? A lot of them don't finish college because. But then they have less students. Right. Right. And they have less student debt if they don't finish. Well, in a sense, right, they have less student debts, but they still have all those years of debts, right? But that's not the point. The point is, these are the future of our country. You know, these are the people. We need to teach the next generation, right, to be smarter so we can compete with China, right? So we can compete with Russia, right? So we can compete with all our adversaries. Education is a key factor in that. But we're telling these kids, well, go do it yourself. Go figure it out. Kick rocks. Kick rocks. Whereas the corporations, you know, they live scot-free. A lot of them barely pay any taxes. Okay, I want to see that card. Let me see that card. Thank you. So the claim is, America practices strict capitalism for the country's poorest, yet open socialism for the country's wealthiest. Correct. So the very wealthiest benefit from socialist policies and the very poorest are forced to just fend for themselves. Strict capitalism, right? Okay, now, then we have to ask a question. For every dollar, that the poorest Americans pay in taxes, local, state, and federal, how much do they get back in government programs? What's that number? It's $6.17. For the highest earning quintile of Americans, for every dollar that they pay in taxes to the government, what do they get back in government programs? What's the number? 11 cents. They can afford it. They could afford it. You know, they're billionaires. They have a lot of money. That's just a write-off for them. So hold on. Trip to south of France. That's nothing to them. I didn't know Elon Musk needed social security checks. I don't think he does. But the claim was that the poorest are left to fend for themselves while the richest are getting all these nice handouts. And so my question then is, what is the effective income tax rate for the richest quintile of Americans? If they pay taxes, that is, right? Sure, it's. They do. Here's the effective median income tax rate. Sure, it seems high, right? There are certain states that have state taxes and will pay federal. No, nationwide. Nationwide. 31%. What is the effective rate for the lowest quintile? If they actually pay their taxes and they don't tax evade. That's an effective tax rate. That includes tax evasion. 31%. What is the effective tax rate for the poorest quintile? Something in the 20s? No, it's actually less than zero because they're net takers. So they effectively don't pay anything. Well, it depends. It depends on a household, right? It depends on. It doesn't. It literally is just the bottom quintile versus the top quintile, which totally disproves your claim. So then I think you might ask, you bring up the corporations. This is a very good point because there is corporate welfare in America. Now, corporate welfare is promoted by the right in some cases, but it's promoted by the left too for various favored businesses and industries. So both sides do it. It's about $180 billion per year in corporate welfare paid out by the government. Then the question becomes, in terms of means-tested welfare programs, what is the total annual spend? I'm not talking Medicare. I'm not talking Social Security. Means-tested welfare, what's the spend? $1.7 trillion. Almost 10 times. 10 times the so-called corporate welfare. So any way you slice it, look, we give a lot of money to the poor. I'm for giving money to the poor. A lot of these government programs don't work because they're full of fraud and they're ineffective. They violate subsidiarity, but whatever. In principle, I'm for it. My only point is, your claim is totally bunk because in this country, the rich pay for basically everything and the poor get a ton of free stuff. No, well, I'm not referring to welfare and Section 8, so on and so forth. That's not what we're talking about here. I'm talking about the fact that we all pay taxes. We pay taxes, right? Well, some of us pay taxes. I know we prefer to not pay taxes. A lot of us would not, right? But we still do pay our taxes, right? We're Biden citizens or we go to prison, right? But, you know, our taxes aren't going to better infrastructure, road systems, high-speed rail, right? Our taxes are going to the Middle East to fight never-ending wars. $3, $4 trillion in Afghanistan. Well, I thought Joe Biden had a big infrastructure bill, didn't he? But the Republicans actually fought very hard to block that. And now they're all taking credit for Joe Biden's hard work. No, I don't want credit. You can take credit for that. I don't want the credit. Well, I see a lot of them. Like Nancy Mace, she takes a lot of credit for the money that went to her district. But I remember her voting against it, right? So a lot of Republicans, they'll vote against it and say it's bad when it's happening because it's topical and they can get some points, some political capital. But ultimately, we need to spend money in our country instead of spending on endless wars in the Middle East, regime changing, and fighting wars that have nothing to do with us and killing Americans. We need to spend money here. But Brian, as I just mentioned, you say we need to spend money here for the poor. So $1.7 trillion a year in means-tested welfare. How much do you want to spend? $1.8? $1.9? How much more do you want to spend? I don't want welfare. We don't need more welfare. We need investments. Not just random investments, right? Education, right? High-speed rail. So we, hold on, we need to give money to people who are disproportionately wealthier than the poorest Americans, namely, college students? Well, college students aren't wealthier than Americans. They are. No, no, no, no, they're not. Because I know people who are in college right now who are working two jobs to pay for college, right? To pay for their loans that they took. Sure, they had to get maybe their parents to co-sign. But now the kids are going to college means you're wealthy. So that's not a fact. Why do they go to college? Because they want to have better prospects when they graduate. Do they have better prospects when they graduate college? It depends on what they. There's my point. It depends on what they go to college for, right? Yeah. If you go for a vacation, right? Or not just a vacation, if you go for something technical, right? All right, fine. You know, I studied history and Italian literature at college. It was the least practical major I could possibly have. But the Daily Wire promises they're going to pay me any day now. The first time in 10 years they're going to pay me. Do we have any questions? Hey, Michael, can I interest you in a rogue six milli? Don't even do this to me, Satan. Get behind me. Because I truly like I have been led to the desert like our Lord. It is Ash Wednesday when we are filming this and I said I am giving up those delicious lip pillies, those poisonous nicotine pouches. I'm kidding. We all know you can only handle three. And then you show up, you say, Michael, all the kingdoms of the world can be yours if you only bow down to my rogue. No! Um, uh, I was going to open with boring because, okay, this last segment, the taxes, it's important. This question's for Blondie. Okay, so, uh, what's your favorite part of illegal immigration? Is it. Hold on. My favorite part of illegal immigration is all the crime they commit. I love it. I love the crime that they bring in and I love that it's less than the average American citizen. Wait, hold on, wait, wait. I'm not. I was going to give you multiple choice. Okay, okay. Let's go. Is it, uh. Can we do that back, though? Can I give you, like, a pop quiz afterwards? Yes, please. All right, let's go. Okay, can you, uh, is it the fact that, uh, brown people serve you food that's delicious? No, I love it I love it actually the most when white people do it. Wait, wait, wait, wait. Or is it the fact that you don't know any and you can love them from a distance and annoy everyone at Thanksgiving? No, unlike, uh, Harry Sisson, who was on here, I let all of the illegal immigrants into my home. I house them all. Based? Every single one of them is in my home back in Florida. Nice. All of them. Okay, on stolen land, of course. Can we do a pop quiz now? Yeah, please quiz me. Pop quiz now. Okay, just simple answer. Trump slash MAGA versus an illegal immigrant. In the Epstein files 38,000 times, Trump or. Trump or. Trump or immigrants? Immigrants. Immigrants? Hold on. Immigrants, okay, okay. Wait, I guess he's right because. Hold on, hold on. He's also an immigrant himself. You know, he's a new generation. He's from Germany, right? So I guess he's technically correct. Oh, Trump. Okay, hey, wait. What was your, uh, what was your question? Yeah, in the Epstein files 38,000 times, immigrants or Trump? Uh, probably Trump. Probably Trump. That's what I was thinking. Has 34 felony convictions. Okay, can I ask you a question? Can I ask you a question? Average immigrant or Trump? - Trump. - Out of how many illegal border crossings-- - Answer the question. We're doing pop quiz time, what happened or popcorn. The people he's taking across the board. Come on, reel it back in. Focus. That's what the coyotes do. We're in class right now. Lock in. Okay. Well, polls tell you what voters said at one moment. But Kalshi gives you another way to follow a race, a live market that moves as traders respond to new information. In Michigan, Abdul El-Sayed and Mike Rogers are competing in one of Kalshi's most traded midterm matchups. You can visit Kalshi's midterms hub to track how the market views the race and then trade an event contract on the outcome you think is going to happen. If you're right at settlement, each winning contract is worth $1. See the market, make your call, trade what happens next on Kalshi. That's Kalshi, K-A-L-S-H-I, Kalshi, trade on anything. Kalshi products are not available in all jurisdictions, prices, values, and available markets may differ from those mentioned. For more information, you can go see Kalshi.com slash regulatory. What? Trump's in the Epstein files more than illegal immigrants. Ooh. Yes. Hey, buddy, that was the first question. We're on question number two of the pop quiz. Question number two. Do you remember what question two was? I can ask it again. No, please do. Question number two was, has 34 felony convictions of falsifying business records, Trump or illegal immigrants? Trump. He says illegal immigrants. Illegal immigrants. Who cares? Do you understand? Sorry, I don't know if that's PC. Their entire existence in this country is falsified. Wait, answer the question. This is a simple yes or no. 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. Does the average illegal immigrant have 34 felony counts of falsifying business records? Yes, but they're not correct. Most illegals don't own Mar-a-Lago. Wait, wait, I have a question for that guy. Yeah, yeah. Do you agree that being in the Epstein files is bad? No. Do you agree that pedophiles? Certainly not. Yes. Certainly not. Okay, okay, okay, okay. Let me phrase. You lived hard. We're pro-pedophiles. Generally speaking, yeah. So do you, generally speaking, so he does agree. He does. He's a smart guy. So we could all agree that what the Department of Justice is doing right now is bonkers, right? You mean the largest declassification of any documents in American history? I disagree. They were all redacted. I agree that is kind of bonkers. I disagree. I wouldn't have done it, but. I disagree. There's over 6 million. They released 3.5 million heavily redacted. Matter of fact- 6 million. They didn't want them released, but Ro Khanna, who I've interviewed multiple times on the topic. I'm sorry. I'm sorry that you've had to deal with it. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massey. Guys, guys, guys. Guys. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massey forced Donald Trump's hand to release the files, which he did sign because he realized that he couldn't escape it. But then you have Pam Bondi, right? Releasing half the files. Dude, yes. Okay, fine. Released them all. What are you talking about? The illegals in America, it's a big problem. Epstein is a big problem, too, because there's a lot of string pulling happening, a lot of chomos everywhere touching kids and shit. It's weird. Wait, can I get another pop question in? Yeah. Higher rates of violent crime, American citizens or illegal immigrants? Percentage-wise. We're just going to go over with saying chomo. We're just going to paper over that. More two-parent households. Immigrants are the average American citizen. Again. These people are more American than you people. I don't give a shit. We're crazy. Okay. Oh, we can talk about black families. Look, hey, I'm willing to condemn that black families don't have fathers in their households. Now, are you willing to condemn Donald Trump for raping a woman having 34 felony counts? None of that happened. And being in the Epstein file 38,000 times? Isn't this crazy? I think we need to all realize like, hey, we're in a room of crazy people. If you're not willing to condemn one single thing that Donald Trump has done, but the left is willing to sit here and condemn. I don't like that law. That was the one law I didn't like. I'm not a big fan of him. What did you condemn? I missed that. The First Step Act. I didn't like that. When he let the criminals out of prison the first term. Now, he gets like 99% of things right, but that was one law I didn't like. So there you go. I condemn one thing he did. But not being in the Epstein files 38,000 times? Not really. I mean, like Gmail's in it millions of times. Do you think like child rape is bad? So the thing is, there are very few things that CNN. I think child. Boo! Child rape! Boo! There are very few things that CNN and the left-wing website factcheck.org and I all agree on. The one thing we all agree on is that there is not a single substantiated serious allegation of wrongdoing against Trump in the entirety of the millions of Epstein files. But how do we know that? How do we know that? They haven't to this day. I don't know. Because the left and the right agree on this weirdly enough. No, they don't. No, they don't. CNN, factcheck.org, Michael Knowles. There you go. You got the left and the right. Wait, let's just say. They haven't till this day created a special prosecutor or a task force to go through the files. Just as France is doing to figure out are there any crimes here? Did they commit any crimes that could be prosecuted? We don't know this because the trained eye haven't combed through the files. They are doing it in France. They started this last week. But our Department of Justice is like, "Nothing to see here, folks. Case closed. Have a good day." And that's why this became such a big topical issue because Pam Bondi said, "Well, it's on my desk." Then a week, maybe three weeks later, she was like, "Well, case closed. We didn't find anything here." And she was actually creating a task force to determine if there were anything viable for them to go after. She just. But they did disclose over 3 million documents, right? Hold on, hold on. Half. That's half. How many documents did Joe Biden declassify under his presidency? Well, I could agree. When they had all the same documents? I could agree. He should have released them as well. How many? Was it a single one? Not a single one. But you could also agree that he was arrested under Donald Trump, right? But he was. Okay. All right. Next question. He was also killed under Donald Trump. He was murdered while he was president. I thought he was killed. I thought he was murdered. I thought he killed himself. Conveniently. Oh, yeah. Conveniently. Hold on. Are you opposed to the death of a child molester? No, no, no, no, no, no. I do not oppose. Call me crazy. But it's just so. Okay. Next question. Michael, I have a question for you. Yes. Okay. You have been led off the hook this whole time. No one has asked you a question. And this segment was supposed to be about the economy. And I got to tell you, I am sick and tired of billionaires because they could be doing so much to help people. They could be doing so much to help the world. But instead, they keep trying to go to the moon. Okay? Every billionaire is trying to go to the moon. And you keep saying that the moon landing was real. You eat that tasty, tasty government slop. Okay? You keep saying that the moon landing is real. And you are not man enough to admit that the moon is not real, Michael. Okay? The moon is not real. It's an optical illusion of the firmament. And you. And I know why you won't say it, because you are bought and sold by Israel. And I am sick of it, Michael. I am sick of it, Michael. Why don't you call Benjamin Netanyahu and get the rest of your lines for this show? Look, I have two words to say to that. Oy vey, they got me. You got me. You totally got me. I. You're right. Benjamin Netanyahu invented the moon. And I'm glad you went all the way. And you didn't just talk about. Some people believe like we landed on the moon like multiple times in the '60s and '70s. But you went much further and observed that there is no such thing as the moon. So I can amend your bravery. And I'm sorry that Mossad and the CIA and MI6 and the KGB are going to take us all out right now. And you know who that single agent is going to be? You guessed it, Jeffrey Epstein. That's right. Okay. Do we have another question? All right. What's up, guys? Things have been getting kind of out of hand. I want to rein it back in. Okay? Okay. How do we feel about Clavicular getting frame-mogged by the ASU frat leader? Based. Absolutely. No. Unironically, look, I want to speak to you about this. I think Clavicular is severely mentally ill. I think something is fucking wrong with him. He's on so much drug. I don't know if you guys know who this is. This is like some not so niche internet personality who. If I hear that word again, I'm going to jump off a cliff. Clavicular. Okay. Okay. I don't care. You guys are not. So look, I sat down with Clavicular for like two hours and the guy, he's got to get on the right path. He's a little. He's young, but he's a little on the wrong path. He's got to get on the right path. But he is the greatest reality TV star of the last 15 years. He ran over a person with his Tesla. Yeah. They don't care about crime. And now, he's walking around with a loaded gun. What are you. Yeah, but did he or is it all just like reality TV? Like, did you just get completely reality TV-mogged? Well, just like with Rene Good, I heard the car hit him. I heard the car hit him. Yeah, I don't know. Just like Rene Good. Entertainment Max, and that's a new one. I heard it. It must be real. It did. I know. Actually, that's a fair point. That's a fair point. It's all kind of contrived. I agree. All right. I just got completely bell-mogged. Do we have any more? No, we don't. Okay. Who won that round? Was it like all those other guys, or was it. Wait! Let's go. Let's go. Was it the second guy? Yeah! It was Witt. It was Witt! All right, there we go. Yeah, it's time for round three. Okay, round three is my topic. And my topic is that the secret to a successful marriage is to reject feminism entirely. Let's begin. This is advice that I got from a good friend of mine, Andrew Klavan, I got married. I've now been married for seven and a half years, and I've found it to be entirely correct. He said two pieces of advice. One, don't sleep with other people. Two, reject feminism entirely, because feminism is intrinsically opposed to marriage. I think there's a million examples of this. I don't think I really need to prove it, but just one good example. Simone de Beauvoir, one of the architects of modern feminism, in The Second Sex, says that marriage is obscene, in principle. She's totally opposed to marriage. Why is this? Well, because marriage posits a view of human nature that changes things up. We used to think that men and women were complementary. You know, yin and yang, we each need each other. Feminism says, no, we're basically the same. We're identical, indiscernible, and therefore rivals. And this has led to a lot of downstream social effects. Seventy percent of divorces, we know, are initiated by women. When you look at college-educated women, who are much more likely to hold feminist views than, remember, jumps to 90 percent. We now have a study came out, I think it was in 2018, showed that 55 percent of single women think that single women are happier than married women, which isn't true. They are not happier. But for our purposes, it doesn't matter. The fact that they think they are is actually sufficient. For the first time ever, boys in high school want to get married at a higher rate than girls in high school do. This is a great, shocking turn of events. People have turned against marriage. This was easily predictable. There was another survey that came out that showed that where egalitarian gender norms are introduced, marriage declines and divorce spikes. Also to be expected because of mismatched expectations. In any case, the data are clear. Where feminism grows, marriage collapses. And so if you want to have a good marriage, reject feminism. Well, I'm as liberal as they come, but I tend to agree in that regard. Let's go, baby. Let's go. Yes. Well, primarily because, you know, it takes two people to make a home, right? And a child needs the energy of both parents, you know, men, women, yin and yang. And I believe that feminism is biased in a way where it promotes just one of those energies. And you can't raise a child in a relationship where it's only two guys or it's only two girls. And it's not to take a job. Here, let's go, baby. Up. I relinquish the microphone. I just want to, please, please. And it's not to take a job at the LGBTQ. I respect them. I respect what they're doing. But, but, but, but nature, right? Nature is something that is sacred and something that should be respected. Awesome. Love it. Agree. A hundred percent. Leftist blondie. All right. All right. Okay. I figured this one was, picked for me because I, we had talked about, it wasn't picked for him. Although now if I had known I would have picked it for him. So, uh, we actually find in studies, multiple studies back this up that when partners share ideas about egalitarianism and traditionalism, then they have happier marriages. So it's not necessarily that somebody, you know, is happy if they're just both traditional. It's actually what we find is that when both partners share the same ideas about egalitarianism and about traditionalism, then they're the most happy. Sure. I grant you that to some degree. Uh, does one group get married and stay married at a higher rate than the other one group? Meaning which groups are we comparing the traditional conservatives and the liberal feminist types that the answer, the answer is yes. So it is true that when, when, uh, partners, we used to apply that to accounting firms and homosexuals. Now we say men and well, yeah, now we say it's husbands and wives, but, but when, when spouses, uh, agree, they are, they are, uh, more likely to have a thriving marriage. Nevertheless, if you are a conservative, uh, you are much more likely to get married. You're much more likely to get married earlier. You're much more likely to stay married than if you're a liberal or a feminist. Okay. So there's an underlying presupposition that staying married is a good thing overall. Yes. On face value. If you know what the word prima facie is, then you'll know what I mean by this. Prima facie. I'm a prima fascist actually. Oh, we know. Um, I'll go, I'll get in jokes, but prima facie. Yes. Staying married is a good thing. Good thing. There is an asterisk. However, to that staying married in an abusive relationship is not a good thing. Staying married in a situation where you no longer have love for your partner is not a good thing. Staying married. I was with you because on the first part, uh, there is, I'm opposed to divorce just generally, but, uh, there could be an argument for a civil separation. However, there was a study that examined this. I think in Virginia after the liberalization of divorce laws, which is one of the triumphs of feminism supposedly. So in the cases of the liberalization of divorce laws within five years, uh, divorce rates increased between eight to 16%. What percentage of those cases involve domestic violence? The, the answer is 6%. Domestic violence are reported domestic violence. That's the problem that we run into. A lot of 6% of the divorce cases cite domestic violence. Okay. And those cases are the cases where women felt comfortable enough or the partner who was being abused. They felt comfortable enough to report that violence. Now we know in the real world, because we all exist in the real world, women don't always report violence. Even in the case of a divorce, what, what incentive would they have to hide it in the case of a divorce? I grant you that in a marriage, she's divorcing the man. I think he's going to retaliate. You can't think of a reason why a man or woman might not want to hide the fact that her partner was abusive. So that way he suffers consequences. No, I can't in a marriage, but not in a divorce. You don't think that abusers ever come back for their victims? No, I don't think that abusers ever come back for their victims. After they're divorced? Does anyone think that that's the case that abusers just never come back after they've been divorced? But in the case, in the case of leaving the home, taking the kids and taking half his money, I'm pretty sure the abuser is already angry. So actually in that case, the woman would have every incentive to cite the domestic violence in order to incur even greater legal protections against him. Just because a woman cites domestic violence doesn't mean that something comes out of that. Doesn't mean that that woman gets protection for that. There's a reason for that. I mean, it's because they're not being believed. So your argument is protected by police officers and law enforcement. So yes, of course they're not. I just want to be scared of the repercussions. Your argument is, well, look, divorce is justified in the case of domestic violence. And I say, well, here's the percentages of domestic violence. And you say, well, regardless of that, I believe that it's a much higher percentage based on nothing. And researchers also believe that it's a much higher percentage. This isn't just me. Which one? Which one? I cited to study to you. Well, we can pull it up. I have my phone on me. You want me to? Hey, we'll fact check. I'm on the spot. You don't, you don't, know what this study is, but you're confident that it exists. Okay. Uh, do we have questions from the audience? Yeah. Uh, this is for, uh, libtard blondie or leftist blondie. I wanted to know, I'll change my usernames. If you are, uh, if you are on any SSRIs and if so, how many? No, thankfully not. Just Vyvanse. It works wonders. You should try it. Okay. Thank you. Stimulants. Wow. That's it. That's pretty much it. I mean, the central point was just, you thought you were on the depression pills, but you stumped him. Good grief. No, I'm, I'm stoked, man. I'm locked in. If feminism is, you know, like supposed to make women happier, more, um, you know, just, yeah. Happier in society. Why are so many of them? The SSRI rates are sky high. We get asked the same question about cancer medication. Why are more people on cancer medication than they were in the past? Well, that's because we've developed cancer medications because women now have ways to effectively cope with their anxiety. With their depressions. And that's a good positive thing. I think people getting treatments for the things that they've been struggling with is a wonderful thing. Well, hold on. It's an interesting comparison you make because the reasons that people might be on cancer drugs today could be one of two things. Either people are getting more cancer, which they are, or because there are new drugs that are being introduced. Maybe if they would stop smoking cigars. Well, actually, actually, I hate to cite medical studies, but fewer than four cigars a day has no, uh, statistically significant correlation with mortality. But, uh, since we're citing science, here, uh, regardless, regardless, in the case of depression and the depression pills, the, the cause could be either more people are depressed because of feminism, as the implication is, because the women use these drugs at a very high rate. I don't agree that the implication is feminism. Or, or that, uh, these, there are just newer drugs to take. However, the SSRIs and the depression drugs have been around for decades at this point. So I, I think it would be hard to say that it's because of the introduction of the drugs. Something seems to have changed in the rates of depression. Right, but there's also an increase. Along with the advance of feminism. Sure, there's something malicious going on where more people are being encouraged or, per, like, swayed into being left-handed? No, of course not. It's just that now that we have, right, I was gonna say, who said that? That was funny. But, no, it's not that more people are just being, like, there's not some conspiracy to convince people to be more left-handed these days. No, but I guess the point is, left-handedness, uh, levels out with changing cultural mores, and the depression just keeps growing. And it, at younger and younger ages, and specifically with women, it's, it's, it's, it's so that's why I think that. You know what also keeps growing? What? Wealth inequality. In the countries where wealth inequality is the lowest, in the countries where wealth. No, Michael, don't finish making your point, please. No, no. Look at that butterfly over there. The point is already invalid. In the countries where wealth inequality is the highest, people report the lowest satisfaction rates. In the countries where gender inequality is the highest, people report the lowest satisfaction rates and lowest happiness rates. That's why you look at Afghanistan, and it's persistently at the bottom of happiness levels globally. You can look at countries like Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Finland. Finland. Those countries are always at the top. What do they also rank at the top in? Gender equality. You know, in Afghanistan. Something feminism brought about. It's funny you bring up Afghanistan because in Afghanistan, pretty much everybody's poor. Like, it's not. There aren't, like, a lot of Steve Jobses in Afghanistan. Wait, do you think that women are less equal in Afghanistan? I thought you were talking about wealth inequality. We're talking about inequality, generally speaking. Hold on. There's gender inequality, and where there's wealth inequality, happiness rates plummet. But there's not wealth inequality in Afghanistan. Everybody's poor. The one rich guy they had, Osama bin Laden, got killed. Yes, the world is not one-dimensional. But I'm just saying, the point you. One or more things that contributes to unhappiness in a country. Did you not know that? No, but the point you made was that material wealth inequality is the determinant of unhappiness. I didn't say determinant. Wait, wait, wait. That's a straw man, guys. If you pay attention, he's making that. Go back on the tape. You just said that's what leads to unhappiness. And then you cited the country where everyone's poor. Gender inequality and social stratification of wealth inequality. What is gender inequality? Gender inequality is less access to reproductive health care. Abortion. Gender inequality is. Abortion. is less pay per. But women, this is what's very strange. We liberalized our abortion laws starting in the 1970s in America. But yet, before the 1970s, and you can cite a Yale study on this, Yale Law School, before the 1970s, women were much happier than they are today. Much happier in absolute terms and relative to men. They were reporting that they were much happier. I want to make this very clear. But you're reading their minds beyond the scientific surveys. If we took a study from Chinese people, did you know Chinese people have abnormally high rates of happiness? I wonder why that is. Did you know. Koreans report greater satisfaction with their government? I wonder why. Can we trust that study? Do you think that the statistics coming out of Yale and North Korea are equally reliable? Actually, these days, maybe they are. Maybe they are, actually. Okay, do we have another question from the mic? Yes, hello. This question is also for LibTard Blondie. I'm so serious. I need a new username now. That's fantastic. Thank you. It's kind of a two-parter. The first part is if you were to rank white people in a list. Of, like, your favorite race, would they be the last one? Would they be at the bottom? Oh, you got the wrong leftist. She's a white supremacist. Well, listen, no, no, no. To me, it seems like you really hate white people. I get the perception that, you know, with your opinions on immigration, specifically, wanting to import millions of people, even if they were legally coming to the country, I still see it eroding the social fabric of America and destroying what we are to. What you call America today, right? Can we connect that back to whiteness somehow? Well, this is what I'm saying is you are trying to destroy. We started off at a point about whiteness. Now we're at a point about cultural heritage. Can we connect those two? Say that again? We started off making a point about whiteness, right? Yes, because I think that. About leftists hating white people, which I agree. Yeah, well, but America is historically a white country, and I think that America is not America anymore if it's not white. 14 words incoming. This is crazy. Well, if it's not majority white, I mean. I did not expect this. They really do hate white people. I'm not one of those leftists. That's the difference. But it seems to me from your immigration opinions that you do hate white people. Look, I'm not here to replace white people. I'm just here to say that white people don't have any special claim to any land over some immigrant who wants to work just as hard. So do you hold the same opinions? Take the case of James Fishback. That's a white man. I think immigrants work way harder than that man does. Well, listen, I'm not necessarily a fan of James Fishback. I'm just saying that you should hold that same consistency when it comes to a country like, you know, let's say Cameroon. If Cameroon were to be invaded by Europeans, do you not think that it should stay mostly Cameroonian? What's invasion? Well, they're coming into the country and changing. Like a three million a year showed up against your laws and you couldn't get rid of them. Hypothetically. I'm not even saying that those people shouldn't suffer consequences. I'm saying that they shouldn't deport those people. Now, if white people started coming into Cameroon. So the answer is no, I guess. If white people started coming into Cameroon, I'm perfectly fine with saying, hey, those people deserve basic rights. They deserve due process. And in order to protect. And in order to protect white people in Cameroon, we should also lock those people up so that they don't leave the country, re-offend, and then come back. So you're saying we need to keep the white people in Cameroon. This debate took a turn that I did not expect. Pro-imperialism, pro-colonialism. Based. Downright white supremacy. Crazy, crazy. I didn't see it coming. I want you all to know that that was a straw man. Y'all seen that Bo Burnham skit? F***, it's a scarecrow. You've never seen Bo Burnham? No. Oh, you uncultured. Not that sketch. Okay, what's the next one? All right, I'm circling back. I'm going back to the feminism part. So, here's the thing. I have a problem with the term feminism to begin with. If you're talking about feminism being that as a woman, I have a brain, and I have a right to have an income, and I have the right to support my family, and I have a right to go to college, and I have a right to be an equal member in my relationship. So, if that's what you're calling feminism. Then yes, I'm a feminist. That said, I'm also going to say this, as someone who's been married for almost 33 years at this point in time, they are not mutually exclusive. I can be someone who has a brain, who had the advantage of being able to go to college, multiple times, thank you, who has an income that can support my family comfortably, who does not have the benefit of, as a middle-class member, all of those tax loopholes that were in the first question, and yet can raise my children to be independent thinkers, yes, no matter what side you're on, just be able to support your thoughts. Be independent thinkers, be able to be problem solvers, and be able to know that they are a person who has value in this world, regardless of their. their skin color, their gender, their sexual orientation. Woo! Well, I don't know, you brought race into it, now Blondie over here is going to have a big problem. Wait, does the crowd not agree that people are created equal? Y'all should be cheering for that. No, see, why are the li- wait, wait, wait, I thought God created all of his children equal, why are we not cheering for that? She said everyone's equal. Yeah, no, I mean, that's all, that's great, that's a lovely, that was a lovely speech. In God's eyes, absolutely. You know, the real, where the rubber meets the road, though. Is whether, when we talk about equality, we mean a complementarity in that men and women are different, but of equal dignity made by God. Like Eve coming from Adam's rib rather than his head, which would put her above him or his feet below him. We're talking about magic, I want you all to realize. Well, you're Catholic, so you probably understand this reference that, you know, the first wife of Adam wasn't actually Eve, it was someone else, right? Oh, yeah, the Lilith thing? Yeah. That's, the Catholics don't believe that. Really? No, no, no, that's from Frasier. And some medieval esotericism, but we don't believe that. Understand, wait a minute, understand. Not the Christian on Christian violence. Wait, wait, wait, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Understand that, first of all, it's a very Eurocentric thing for the male to be the figure of the household. Oh my God, I love you. Let's start there. I disagree, I disagree. Secondly, secondly. Disagree. If you want to talk about the Bible, those books were chosen by individuals. There were many other books that aren't in that. That I agree with. That I agree with, because Orthodox Christianity should be. It is true, there are books other than the Bible. There should be. We all agree on that. No, no, no, no. Again, what, but again, what's your argument that you're going back to to support your idea that feminist is bad? Oh, my, okay, well, my argument is that it's contrary to human nature, because it posits an anthropology that says that men and women are not complementary with different virtues and inclinations, but that they're identical, that they're indiscernible. And therefore rivals and undifferentiated. Wait, do you think any modern feminist. So I think that's the error. Wait, wait, wait, do you think any modern feminist thinks that men and women are indistinguishable? Yeah, basically, I think that. Do you think that I believe that or that he believes that? Yeah, do you think that women can do just about everything a man can do? No, I don't think about everything. No, what can a woman do that a man can't do, right? Define just about everything. Take everything and then take away just like a few things. Can they be exactly the same as men? No, of course not. What? Do you think, do you think women are ordered towards the opposite? No, I don't think that women are ordered towards the opposite. What? Do you think, do you think women are ordered towards certain behaviors and men are ordered towards certain behaviors? What does ordered towards mean? Like, women are more nurturing and they're better at being mothers. And men are better at being in public life and earning the bread. Actually, we do find, hey, quick, quick stat. Men report higher levels of well-being being parents than women do. Did you guys know that? Yeah. Women report higher levels of well-being being parents than women do. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I'd like to talk to those men. I think they're a little confused. Okay. Stats don't care. Anyway, that's, that's my point. That's what, that's the difference. Stats don't care about your feelings, Michael. That's the, yeah. The bell's over. Okay, fine. Anyway, that's my point. That's why, sometimes the Libs do this thing where they say, you know, if you like women, you're a feminist. And it's like, that's not really what Mary Wollstonecraft and, you know, Simone de Beauvoir. I don't think anyone here said that. Yeah, I've never heard that before. I don't think anyone here said that before. Who said that? I mean, really? If you like women, you like women. I think, you know how Catholics, like, see the Holy Ghost. I'll give you an example. Aziz Ansari said that on a late night show. English teachers across the country have said that in their feminist curricula in their classrooms. But it's not it. It's about more than that. It's positing the idea that you refuse to answer that men and women are basically the same rather than complementary. No, no, we didn't refuse to answer that. I think a lot of women are like that. I think, you know what? about males and females biologically they're different men are stronger on average men are faster on average men tend to think in different ways than women do how differently how differently yeah they tend to be like they're better at math would you go that far of course not because you know the president of harvard the liberal president of harvard uh larry summers came out and said that he got booted out of his position for it so you'd say men and women think differently but how do they think differently booted out of a position for what for for pointing out that on the uh bell curve uh the reason why women don't win the fields prize they don't tend to do well at math at the highest levels is because men have a higher iq at the tail end and a lower iq at the tail end that their bell sure you can look at the reasons why they have higher iq are men encouraged to go into these math fields no it's just natural to go into okay his argument is what's the argument for that well i know you just said that men and women's brains work differently so i asked how so and you wouldn't tell me how sure no i think that men think in ways that are more protective i think that when i don't know analytical nurturing i don't know if i would agree with women are more emotional next time they're more nurturing no i think that actually i think this is a key flaw in conservative ideology is that we pretend that men aren't as emotional as women are men better at certain why are men committing suicide more than women because of you not as emotional because of you okay all right all right that's it that's the end of the round i don't know if i can make that joke here this is great we got we got unexpected misogyny from one of the libs unexpected white supremacy from another lib no i just i just uh that was one of my favorite episodes we've ever done i can't don't cancel me in my opinion nobody wins a bar fight there are only losers so the question is who lost tonight who's buying the next round is it was it brian no you the audience loves brian brian you you should you should run for president with your ability to win over a room that's amazing uh do we think that our friend and the leftist blonde lost tonight lost someone and do we think that i lost tonight no i didn't know i might have lost in the sense that my my guests have confounded me they've made me think and reorient and see the world differently folks thank you for being here thank you to the two of you for being here see you all on the next episode of bar fight hey michael what we never voted on the vip i want brian to be the vip sorry hold on who who won the question round brian do you want some redneck riviera whiskey sure all right he's done see you next time on bar fight that was great welcome well polls tell you what voters said at one moment but calci gives you another way to follow a race a live market that moves as traders respond to new information in michigan abdul el sayed and mike rogers are competing in one of calci's most traded midterm matchups you can visit calci's midterms hub to track how the market views the race and then trade an event contract on the outcome you think is going to happen if you're right at settlement each winning contract is worth one dollar see the market make your call trade what happens next on calci use code daily d-a-i-l-y to get up to 25 when you trade 25 that's calci k-a-l-s-h-i calci trade on anything 18 plus only restrictions and eligibility requirements apply event contracts trading involves risk and may not be suitable for all investors calci products are not available in all jurisdictions prices values and available markets may differ from those mentioned for more information you can go see calci.com slash regulatory there are a few things i love more than good ranchers but there are not many i'll tell you that it might i think it might make it on the top five of all things in the world it's just the best quality meat at the very best price from the very best people meanwhile you go to the grocery store you ever ask yourself hey where was this meat raised because american beef on the package does not necessarily mean everything that that company sells to you is american good ranchers makes it very simple every cut they sell is labeled born raised and harvested in the usa they partner with more than 100 local american farms and ranchers to deliver 100 american meat straight to your door beef chicken pork even seafood you know what you are feeding your family you know where it came from you're supporting american farmers and ranchers producing it and i love supporting americans and i love a good price for me though it all comes down to the quality the good ranchers quality it is just next level on certainly all the beef even i'm not a huge chicken guy the chicken is like the best chicken you're going to get whether we're talking about the chicken breasts whether we're talking about the c2l free chicken nuggets it's all just magnificent the people are great to start a plan at good ranchers.com slash wire get 50 bucks off plus free meat with every order you can build your own box starting as low as under 29 bucks that's good ranchers.com slash wire 50 bucks off plus free meat with every order good ranchers.com slash wire good ranchers.com american meat delivery © transcript Emily Beynon