In this Macro Minute for Wednesday, September 30, 2026, skipper Darius Dahl asks whether we are at peak good news on inflation, answering perhaps. The August PCE report supported consensus forecasts of slowing inflation, with headline, core, and super core deflators failing to support the firm's sticky inflation theme, while housing PCE supported its cooling housing and labor thesis. The firm's breadth models suggest the Fed could take a victory lap on inflation next year if it supplements the nascent narrowing of adverse inflation breadth by tightening cyclically to ease structurally. However, the secular inflation model forecasts an equilibrium core PCE rate in the high twos to low threes, meaning broad disinflation is unlikely to be sustained without a recession. Dahl argues the Fed may be deliberately holding rates in accommodated territory to agitate the Treasury bond market, creating political cover for a Fed-Treasury Accord 2.0. He notes the Fed has a tri-mandate including moderate long-term interest rates. August PCE, final Q2 GDP, and corporate profits data supported the resilient economy thesis. On the community question about VT, Dahl attributes recent weakness to a stronger dollar, rising term premium, and higher rates weighing on international and small/mid-cap stocks, and expects 2027 could reverse this if coordinated policy intervention occurs.
Happy Wednesday out there, Team 42.
It's your skipper here, Darius Dahl, to present our Macro Minute for Wednesday, September 30th, 2026.
Hope everyone's having a great week.
So, as always, we'll start with the executive summary from today's lead-off morning note.
So, let's dive right in.
Today's key macro question is, are we at peak good news regarding inflation?
Short answer is perhaps.
If so, the Fed must take steps to supplement the nascent narrowing of adverse inflation breadth
by continuing to play action paths to set up the run, i.e. tightening cyclically to ease structurally.
The key supporting evidence is the August PCE report strongly supported the consensus forecast of slowing inflation.
The August headline PCE deflator, core PCE deflator, and super core PCE deflator data did not support our sticky inflation theme.
The August housing PCE deflator supported our cooling housing and labor theme and did not support our sticky inflation theme.
The 42 macro PCE deflator breadth models signal the Fed will likely be able to take a victory lap on inflation next year
if the FOMC takes steps to supplement the nascent.
If so, the Fed must take steps to supplement the nascent narrowing of adverse inflation breadth by continuing to play action paths to set up the run.
Our narrow model indicates that 0%, 55%, and 73% of the 11 most important time series are greater than or equal to 3%
on a three-month annualized, six-month annualized, and year-over-year basis, respectively.
Only the six-month and year-over-year signals are worthy of a policy response in the form of further tightening,
a condition shared by only the year-over-year greater than 3% signal in our broad.
So what does all this mean for your portfolio?
Reminder, the 42 macro secular inflation model has accurately forecasted an equilibrium core PCE rate in the high twos, low threes since January of 2022.
Thus, broad-based disinflation in the PCE deflator time series is unlikely to be sustained
because inflation is by far the most lagging indicator of the business cycle
and is unlikely to durably return to the Fed's 2% target without a recession, according to the 42 macro business cycle model.
Notably, the Fed views this to be a good idea for the future.
The 42 macro secular inflation model is accurately forecasted an equilibrium core PCE rate in the high twos, low threes since January of 2022.
Thus, broad-based disinflation in the PCE deflator time series is unlikely to be sustained because inflation is by far the most lagging indicator of the business cycle
Notably, the Fed views this outcome as less desirable than failing on its price stability mandate,
one of several reasons why we believe paradigm D, a.k.a. default via debasement, is a high probability outcome.
To this point, New York Fed President John Williams, vice chair of the FOMC,
gave his prepared remarks on Tuesday afternoon that were supportive of our view that greater coordination between the Fed and Treasury
to counter the geopolitically driven supply-demand imbalance in the Treasury bond market is on the way.
As we discussed throughout the Monetary Policy, Fiscal Policy, and Liquidity sections of our September 2026 macro scouting report a few weeks ago,
we are increasingly of the view that the Fed is deliberately holding the policy rate in increasingly accommodated territory precisely to agitate the U.S. Treasury bond market.
Now, why would they be doing that?
Well, this short-term pain for long-term gain outcome would give Treasury Secretary Scott Besant, Fed Chair Kevin Walsh,
and new Treasury Consultant David Zervos, who was long a big proponent of QE,
the political air cover they need to usher in the Fed-Treasury Accord 2.0 and the coordinated policy intervention that it entails.
Remember, the Fed does not have a dual mandate, contrary to popular narratives.
The Fed has a tri-mandate.
Moderate long-term interest rates are in the same sentence as the maximum employment rate of the Fed.
limit and price stability mandates. So anyway, refer to our September 2026 macro scouting report
and September 28 lead off morning notes for more details on this line of thinking. Elsewhere,
the August PC report, final Q2 GDP data and final Q2 NIPA corporate profits and NIPA retained
earnings data strongly supported our resilient U.S. economy, paradigm C, aka running hot,
jobless recovery and productivity boom things. It's a lot of good news when you look out 12 to
18 months from now. So there's always a wrap up with the question from our community. This was
titled VT. Will all the mid and small caps hurt or help over the long term? It seems like the recent
rise in rates might be weighing down the mid and small caps and VT relative to SPX. How much of
this will matter going forward? So that's unlikely to be the case. VT is the broad global equity
market index. It's cap weighted, just like the S&P. What's really weighing down those stocks is
the fact that we're having a backup in the U.S. dollar, a backup in term premium, a backup in
interest rates. And those things typically weigh on.
More cyclical factors like international stocks, other geographies, as well as small and mid caps.
But it's not the small and mid caps that are weighing on the broad global equity market.
It's the fact that international stocks are now starting to underperform the core parts of the
U.S. equity market, the ones that are less economically sensitive to this backup in interest
rates that are likely to weigh on earnings expectations on a go forward basis. But again,
if we're right on our views with regards to the coordinated policy intervention that's likely
you know, this continued tiptoeing towards paradigm D to solve the problem that is the
geopolitically driven supply-demand imbalance in the treasury bond market, then it's very likely
that 2027 could be pretty much the opposite of what we've seen in the last few weeks,
which is a substantial outperformance of international stocks, small-cast mid-camps
relative to the cap-weighted S&P. So just keep that in the back of your mind as we progress
throughout Q4 and into Q1. So we'll wrap it up there. Darius Dahl here presenting our macro
for Wednesday, September 30, 2026. Best of luck out there today. We'll catch you back here tomorrow.
Cheers.
Backslash disclaimer.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
The August PCE report strongly supported slowing inflation, contradicting the firm's sticky inflation theme.
The firm's PCE deflator breadth models signal the Fed could claim victory on inflation next year if it tightens cyclically now to ease structurally later.
Broad-based disinflation is unlikely to be sustained because inflation is the most lagging indicator and will not durably return to 2% without a recession.
New York Fed President John Williams' remarks supported the view that greater Fed-Treasury coordination is coming to address the Treasury bond market imbalance.
The firm believes the Fed is deliberately holding rates in accommodated territory to agitate the Treasury market and pave the way for a Fed-Treasury Accord 2.0.
The Fed is argued to have a tri-mandate including moderate long-term interest rates, not merely the commonly cited dual mandate.
August PCE, final Q2 GDP, and Q2 corporate profits data supported the firm's resilient U.S. economy and productivity boom thesis.
The firm expects 2027 could see substantial outperformance of international, small, and mid-cap stocks relative to the cap-weighted S&P if coordinated policy intervention materializes.
Summary:
In this Macro Minute for Wednesday, September 30, 2026, skipper Darius Dahl asks whether we are at peak good news on inflation, answering perhaps. The August PCE report supported consensus forecasts of slowing inflation, with headline, core, and super core deflators failing to support the firm's sticky inflation theme, while housing PCE supported its cooling housing and labor thesis. The firm's breadth models suggest the Fed could take a victory lap on inflation next year if it supplements the nascent narrowing of adverse inflation breadth by tightening cyclically to ease structurally.
However, the secular inflation model forecasts an equilibrium core PCE rate in the high twos to low threes, meaning broad disinflation is unlikely to be sustained without a recession. 0. He notes the Fed has a tri-mandate including moderate long-term interest rates.
August PCE, final Q2 GDP, and corporate profits data supported the resilient economy thesis. On the community question about VT, Dahl attributes recent weakness to a stronger dollar, rising term premium, and higher rates weighing on international and small/mid-cap stocks, and expects 2027 could reverse this if coordinated policy intervention occurs.
FAQs
The key macro question is whether we are at peak good news regarding inflation. The short answer given is perhaps.
The August PCE report strongly supported the consensus forecast of slowing inflation. The headline, core, and super core PCE deflators did not support a sticky inflation theme.
The model has forecasted an equilibrium core PCE rate in the high twos to low threes since January 2022. It suggests broad-based disinflation is unlikely to be sustained without a recession.
Paradigm D refers to default via debasement. It is considered a high-probability outcome because the Fed may view inflation above target as less undesirable than failing on price stability, and because of expected Fed-Treasury coordination.
It refers to greater coordination between the Fed and Treasury to counter the geopolitically driven supply-demand imbalance in the Treasury bond market. The speaker believes the Fed is deliberately holding rates in accommodated territory to agitate the Treasury market and create political cover for this accord.
The speaker says the Fed has a tri-mandate, not a dual mandate. The three mandates are maximum employment, price stability, and moderate long-term interest rates.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.