Go back

Another Stolen Election? What The Hell Just Happened in Brazil Premium

1h 42s

Another Stolen Election? What The Hell Just Happened in Brazil Premium

The transcript argues that Brazil's recent presidential election was likely stolen through unprecedented, politically motivated rule changes—such as a last-minute two-hour voting extension granted by a Supreme Court justice—leading to mathematically impossible vote shifts. The results defy historical precedent, with Lula gaining nearly 11 million votes despite losing endorsements from right-leaning candidates. The voter turnout and timing of the rule change suggest manipulation, and the decision to extend voting bypassed standard electoral oversight, particularly in areas favoring the opposition. The narrative is further undermined by the global celebration of the outcome by figures like Bernie Sanders and Macron, who support socialist regimes with known authoritarian tracks, such as Venezuela and Cuba. The show critiques the so-called "democratic socialism" ideology as a cover for anti-democratic governance, arguing that such movements reject democratic accountability once in power. It also highlights a pattern of post-election censorship and media control worldwide, including digital suppression, to silence dissent. A major point of criticism is John Oliver’s claim that Republicans have a "Nazi problem," which is dismissed as self-defeating, factually inaccurate, and based on selective examples. The transcript warns that once authoritarian or socialist groups gain power, democratic processes cannot be restored through voting alone, drawing a direct comparison to the U.S., where similar risks may emerge. The segment concludes by asserting that the events in Brazil signal a broader global trend of election interference, media manipulation, and the erosion of democratic norms.

Transcription

10528 Words, 57636 Characters

English
Welcome to the Line Up Live here on Rumble. Each show rolls into the next, starting, well, I guess it starts at 8 a.m. Yeah, but of course it's 11 a.m. Eastern, so here we are today. Hey, I have a riddle for you. What talks with a funny accent rapes his people of the democratic process and has never occurred anywhere else in recorded history? That's right, the new Brazilian president, supported by democratic socialists like Bernie Sanders and Mamdani. Another election stolen, and when I say that, I don't mean kinda maybe, I mean absolutely stolen right from under the noses of the citizens of Brazil. And we had Bolsonaro on the show yesterday, sorry, last week, who predicted it, and sure enough, that's what we saw. So we're going to give you the anomalies, what has never occurred before, what are outliers, and by outliers I mean only occurring in this election, and what that means for the United States. I'm willing to bet that. There'll be some actions taken, and John Oliver, we haven't heard from him in a while because he doesn't really have a great work ethic, so he kinda appears and then he disappears. Well, I don't know if you know this, but he's saying that the Republican Party, the conservative movement, has a Nazi problem, that many of you are Nazis. But in a self-defeating premise, he says that Republicans have always been Nazis, so I don't really know what he's crying about, but we'll address it anyway. On with the show. Transcription by ESO. Translation by — I'm willing to bet that the Republican Party, the conservative movement, has a Nazi problem, that many of you are Nazis, and that many of you are Nazis, and I don't really know what he's crying about, but I don't really know what he's crying about, but I don't really know what he's crying about. ♪♪♪ ♪♪♪ Click Rumble Premium and join now for $99 annually or $999 a month to get the entirely ad-free experience and an ever-expanding roster of content, creators, and free speech. We'll be right back. My heart goes out to the people of Brazil. What's that? The sound of sleigh bells you hear and a coup. If only. Very likely a Brazilian coup coming. Hey, remember how I talked about in the past? Yeah, you're a fascist. No, I'm saying, how do you get a Pinochet? Well, you look at Allende. How do you get a strong man? You can't vote your way out of socialism slash communism. But I repeat myself. That's exactly what's going on in Brazil. And I will tell you this. I hate fear mongering and I hate rage bait. this should terrify you when you see the folks in your government who are gleeful about it so let me ask you what one election rule would you change tomorrow if you could to make people trust the results you could change one rule what would it be we'll take your chat on that later of course because it's live uh weekdays 11 a.m captain morgan you good i'm feeling about the same as you yeah hopeful for an actual you know a real coup this last time it wasn't a coup yeah but you know they said it was and it wasn't and just to be clear people saying oh do you support i don't want to be taken out of context right i support a brazilian coup to take back their government that was most likely stolen from them in this election and you're saying how would they do that i don't know i i can't give you the details but uh you know i support it great now we can't go to brazil yeah i don't think we could have went forward this is why you'll never hear me say political uh violence is never okay and i'm not saying it necessarily needs to be violent right there can be uh there's a legal process there could be a legal process and if the legal process doesn't work because of all the corrupt supreme court judges who are former lawyers to the current president well then you know you do what you have to do friday saturday november 27th 28th at skyline comedy club in appleton wisconsin josh feierstein that's right don't cool me there No, no, no. How about a non-violent goo in Brazil? Right. How about like, hey, get out of there. That's right. He says, okay. I'm sorry. What you do, your joke is not make me laugh. It was a mistake. Do something for more too funny. Before we get to that. What? A lesser city than Appleton, Wisconsin. Toledo. Well, here are Toledo's finest. And by that, I mean out of shape female officers struggling to arrest a very out of shape female felon. Those aren't going to hold, though. That's not going to hold those. I didn't see that the first time. This is Toledo's version of the rodeo. Oh, this dude just watching. He's like, I'm an ally. I'm an ally. No, I guarantee you that guy's like, nope, you said you could do it. You said you could do it. HR said to encourage our colleagues. He's just watching. He's just there. They need your help, Brody. Just a gaggle of black people roasting them. I know. That's hilarious. Hey, they stupid as hell right here. They can't do it. they can't do anything no it's just hold on let's call some guys in there we go do your arm like this you know there's your equality and the fact that people were angry when i think we did a change my mind on this like women should not be in combat roles when people sit down and go well are you serious are we really having this discussion you really think that this is a place where you want to ensure equity honestly at what if it's not a performance-based job meaning the ability to carry out public safety then just just say what it is that you want just say you want a communist society where people are assigned whatever you deem them to do like video is great evidence for the you know the no women in combat argument because you just put them all together. Yeah. That was my thing. I was like, well, yeah, you want to comment? Sure. Yeah. But they're all one unit. All one unit. Let's try that. Let's try that. Because if they need to lean on the men, well, then they shouldn't be there in the first place, right? Yeah. Well, in that case, they were leaning on the felon because she was basically a red oak crying out loud. She wasn't even fighting back then. She was just like, I don't think I'm going to comply. To be fair, I don't know if I could have handled that woman either. Oh, yeah, you could. I would have put it on her face. Yeah, absolutely. Well, although she probably would have a little bit of padding, because to her credit, she did take a special seminar on self-defense. Now, that's intimidating at first glance, but I will say, when you face the well-known boob slap attack, as long as you sidestep the boob slap, you're pretty much in the clear. She's practicing jiu-jitsu. Yes, she is. that's uh karate that's right it's not the gentle art tit boxing if you will i just don't go on for very long time let's just not okay sure speaking of boobs i tell you what president trump uh we share this in common and i guess so does gerald yes he doesn't seem to be a boob guy he seems to like uh you know and look this is one thing it used to remember when people were offended when they found out that men in a private messaging chat were like rating women from one to ten just as far as looks you know that women do all the time as a matter of fact it's usually the basis for studies when they have members of the opposite sex rate each other well and then men they could be a you know a breast man or a thigh man it doesn't look there are many thigh men anymore like many leg men no seems like it kind of breaks down into two okay well you're you're you know you're a leg guy you're like the independent yeah you know like you're a libertarian give me a nice pair of shorts yeah you're like the old browns jersey it's just like yeah i remember those guys classic now it seems to primarily break up into two categories and during a campaign rally in port here on michigan yesterday i think that president trump made it really clear as to which category of man he is i'm looking at him up and down and looked at his ass and i've never done that with a man before it's true by the way i looked at one hell of a beautiful ass before Nicki Minaj. ♪ Fat tits on frothy sky ♪ ♪ Call asses all the time ♪ ♪ But not if it's on the guy ♪ Off the record, women, yes, men, no, okay. Thanks for the raid. That's time. Welcome. I'm glad they came at that point. What I love too is if you watch the clip, he's like, I hope that I don't make her uncomfortable. You're not. That's what she's known for. It's fine. She has no problem with it. It's only the feminists who are uncomfortable talking about her body. He just said she has a nice rear. She made that butt. That's not natural. She wants that attention. She purchased it. Yeah. By the way, I don't know if you know this, but big thing now, if you want to wear the slutty uniforms that Shane Gillis referred to at the gym, you want to fill them out, you can just buy it. Isn't that a beautiful thing? You don't have to work for it? You can just purchase it. You can purchase body parts. There used to be the libertarian argument like you shouldn't be able to purchase a kidney because you have to be on the donor list and they're like, it'll create a black market. There is a black market for butts. Isn't that like false advertising though? Come on. You show me the ass facts. Yeah, something. What's false about it? There's no ass facts. No, it's not. It's pretty awkward. Yeah. It's like, oh, it's a rental. Now. Free home. Hurts. No thanks. I've had a lot of clients. It was a whole enterprise. Yeah. Wow. Sometimes I get it on a budget. That's a national ass right here. And I remember the ASIMO. Just a bunch of rental car company jokes. I hate all of you. Yeah, I hate myself. Well, you're mad because you couldn't think of one. Yeah. No, I'm actually glad I couldn't think of one. You couldn't think of one. Now I'm trying to think of what's the other one. What are the other big car rentals? Sixed. What? Sixed? Yeah. Sixed. Sixed is a real thing? Yeah, that's a real one. It's that stupid horse commercial I keep seeing. I hate it. All right. Well, I can't do anything with that. No, you can't. Okay. I can't do anything with this either other than do you hear what I hear? A coup, a coup brewing in Brazil. Hopefully, hopefully. And I mean that. I really do. Like, I hope the people of Brazil have had enough and I hope that they do something about this. This is not guesswork. Was there an election that was stolen? It was stolen right under the noses of the citizens of Brazil. And of course, we've always had corruption in these countries. But this one last night was egregious. It was predicted. And I'm going to lay out the need to know facts today. So 80-year-old Lula da Silva. Was reelected yesterday after defeating the heavily favored challenger. When I say heavily favored, I mean, because Bolsonaro, Flavio Bolsonaro, won the first round of the elections. And people thought, well, obviously, he won the first round by significant margin. The third for the third party candidates were conservative and they endorsed Bolsonaro. So, also, he would be the first person ever to win the first round and not win the second round. Instead, oh, and a surprise upset. Like. The buster Douglas of corrupt Brazilians. Lula da Silva won. A major surprise in Brazil's runoff election with President Lula da Silva beating Flavio Bolsonaro, defying pre-election expectations. Lula's supporters took to the streets to celebrate a result many had not thought possible after Bolsonaro, the son of the jailed former president, Jair Bolsonaro, won the first round of voting three weeks ago. Thank you. People went to vote because we were able to convince them that the vote was very important to safeguard democracy in the country. OK. I can assure you that we will change the way this country is governed. I want to tell you that we will make the people participate more in our decisions. A couple of things. I was like, he's wearing a Ralph Lauren shirt, which I'm not saying that that's, you know, Armani, but it's not cheap when you have people living in dirt huts. I always wonder where the hey, can can any of you socialists or democratic socialists like tell me where the line is? Like, when does someone have too much like Ralph Lauren will allow it if it's TJ Maxx? Otherwise, it's got to be Old Navy or missing a button. He got it at Ross. We'll forgive champs like or champions are like, what is it? I always wonder that. Oh, you know what? Oh, is it? Is it? It's not Lacoste. It's IZOD. OK. He's a socialist. By that, I mean, he's a communist. So let me lay this out for you. This, at least to my understanding, would be the first time that a an incoming president lost round. One of voting, but one round two. Here's what we also saw. Unprecedented election rule changes in the middle of the game. An impossible amount of voter turnout that defies reason. And you'll see the betting odds swap the moment before we knew the outcome. The moment the rule change took place. Everyone said, OK, we know exactly how this is going to go. And the pro democracy crowd, that's something you guys need to pay attention to as well. We says he says we have to do this for democracy. That sounds familiar. Democratic socialism. What they really mean is you'll democratically elect a socialist once on the Santa Claus platform. And then it doesn't matter how you vote ever again. So let's go through the key facts here and check the references. We make them available. Link in the description. Every day we broadcast 11 a.m. Key fact number one here. There was an unprecedented rule change of voting extension. So it was an emergency request by Lula's campaign. They extended voting by two hours. And the rule. Or sorry, the ruling, I should say, this this request was granted by who who none other than Lula's personal lawyer, former personal lawyer, who's now a Supreme Court justice. And all this took place three minutes after polling closed in pendientes de Brasil, porque allí la justicia ordenado ampliar el horario de votación en esta segunda vuelta presidencial. A esta hora, de hecho, ya deberían haber cerrado en todo el país. Almudena Ariza, tú sigues en un colegio electoral en Sao Paulo. Cuéntanos qué más sabemos. Bueno, hay mucha confusión e incertidumbre porque efectivamente un tribunal electoral ha decidido que se amplíe dos horas más la jornada electoral. So before this ruling change, OK, before they extended polling again, completely unprecedented and certainly by a Supreme Court justice, the markets had Bolsonaro at 68 percent, Lula at 32. Within the hour, without knowing anything else, just knowing, oh, wait a second, there was a last minute rule change that makes no sense. It flipped completely. Bolsonaro. The 40 Lula to 60. Wow. In other words, without knowing any other information, people go, oh, wait a second, something unprecedented in an election that would seem like foul play. Yeah, the left is going to win. The money doesn't lie. Yeah. I bet you we would have had the same thing as far as that if we could have known before and with Biden. It's like, oh, now you got that big dump without knowing anything else. The money went from Bolsonaro is clearly going to win, clearly going to win. Wait a second. Corruption. Left wins. That would be all I need to tell you. But let's get into everything else. So this ruling was it bypassed the electoral court, which is the one that usually makes these decisions. Now, people will say they both requested it. No, no. Lula made a request. Then Bolsonaro did request poll extension. But in certain areas that were experiencing flooding and power outages. So Lula said, hey, we want an extension. And then Bolsonaro said, you know, it might be fair for some of these places. And instead, the request was made by the buddy of Lula. And not everywhere got an extension. And if you actually look. At the polling locations, the ones that were already closed were the ones that would favor Bolsonaro. You know, that's how they often steal elections. And in Brazil, I'm sure they also just make up votes because we'll get to the math in a second. Here's actually. Is this from Brazilian TV? A brief clip that kind of explains to you which ones were open and could still continue. Estamos precisamente en un colegio electoral en Sao Paulo donde si han cerrado. Entonces nos preguntamos y ellos mismos se preguntan porque unos colegios si y otros no. La cuestión nos dicen aquí este colegio había cerrado a las cinco ya y han recibido la orden. Después entonces esto les impedía reabrir el colegio por el sistema electrónico que con el que funciona este proceso electoral. And by the way, this is why you can't make those rule changes. For example, we saw this in Pennsylvania violating their own constitution because there's no way to know, especially in a pressure situation, what went wrong. In other words, hey, was that phone call made seven minutes too late? Who was making the phone call to these polling locations? How were they notified? Was one location notified earlier? Earlier than the other? There are far too many failure points. That's why you have rules and you abide by them. Exactly. And that's why there is a special group of people that will make that decision. A panel of judges will make the decision for elections, not a Supreme Court justice and certainly not the former lawyer for Lula making that decision. Because once the polls close there, they physically can't reopen them. You shouldn't have a guy running. Nobody else voting. Running for the presidency. Call up his former lawyer on the Supreme Court. Say, ring, ring. Hey, yeah, we want to extend location one, six and seven. And by the way, we have an exclusive recording of how that phone call went down. Oh, hey, judge. Judge, I'm going to need more time. Tell them to keep the polls open for more. It's late. I'm trying to relax with television. This is how I met your mother. It's pretty good. It's time for you to get more votes. Put down the remote. Go. To your computes. Make for vote extends so I can have more vote. But only to make more time. Look at your compute. You see? Uh-huh. Here. More votes. Here. And for to do here. Okay. Everywhere. No. Oh. Baja. Only these places for to get more votes. More. More. Hey. I need nine million. more okay but that's cheating don't hey uh don't be a bitch don't be a bitch okay meet your new president it turns out it's that easy here's key fact number two uh the results completely defy mathematics themselves so in case you've forgotten bolsonaro won round one of voting by more than two million votes okay over lula who was second place now the candidates in third fourth and fifth place were all right wing or right leaning right both number three and five endorsed bolsonaro none endorsed lula as a matter of fact the one who didn't endorse bolsonaro said he wouldn't encourage his voters to vote for lula so the endorsements alone six million if you take these three candidates who would lean right their voters nine million in other words people who didn't vote for for lula in that first round would be absolutely most likely to vote for bolsonaro because they were voting against lula in that first round okay so round one lula had about 53.9 million votes bolsonaro 56.1 million votes so if you were to add the six million votes from the endorsements of right-wing candidates or even let's say a percentage of the nine million that would reasonably go to the right wing candidate you would think that bolsonaro might get a few million more votes and lula might lose a few instead lula went from 53 million to 65 million give or take so an increase of close to 11 million votes and bolsonaro went up to 59.7 so he went up by three and a half million votes how does that make sense endorsement from right-wing candidates that's six million votes in the bag another candidate that would be about nine million instead he only gains three but lula got votes from nowhere he got all of the extra votes yeah that's insane and the overall it went up millions in round two which by the way does not happen because i'm ready for i was looking this up this morning i spent a lot of time the numbers potential counter-argument people would think because in the united states far fewer people vote in primaries right then would vote in a general that's not the case in brazil why because if you win 50 of the vote in round one the election is over it only goes to a second round if you don't get 50 of the vote so if people were to say well it's natural participation would go up in round two it's natural participation would go up in round three and it's natural participation would go up in round three and it's natural participation would go up in round four and it's natural participation would go up in round five and it's natural participation would go up in round six and it's natural participation would go up in round seven and it's natural participation would go up in round eight and it's natural participation would go up in round nine and it's natural participation would go up in round 10 and it's natural participation would go up in round 11 and it's natural participation would go up in round 12 and it's natural participation would go up in round 12 and it's natural participation would go up in round 13 and it's natural participation and only lula in 2022 and now he must be amazing yeah he must be just like a shining star so it's not in line with precedent the math doesn't make sense and again as soon as the rule change happened mid-game the betting odds went well okay obviously that's it that's game set match the left this is going to win here's actually a breakdown from eduardo bolsanaro uh his brother who was on the show last week so you have let's say 90 million votes on the table lula when he won is just like he had he got all of these votes plus also another almost two million votes this is just unbelievable and then you see here in a map where you had the cities in red where lula increased his votes and in blue where flavio increased his votes so this is by statistic impossible to happen and by the way it's not like this is something no one saw coming last friday i highly recommend you go watch it eduardo gave us this exact prediction prediction on the election in brazil are you guys hopeful that your vote will be counted this time because in part of the popular uprising so we're going to have to wait and see if we can get it right so we're going to have to they are less likely to commit fraud because they're scared is that is that part of it this is the only way to win it's too big to rig right yeah other way like uh i mean they can fraud i don't know i don't know they can fraud and just like here when you start this debate you literally can lose your social media you're going to be censored in brazil have a problem in the courts yeah we're going to get that into uh into that in a second but key fact three here as it relates stateside it's important when people say the quiet part out loud that you listen to them the worst people you know are celebrating and they're celebrating in the name of democracy including alex soros gavin newsom macron uh miguel diaz canal the cuban president carney chinese foreign ministry kremlin mia khalifa and what i have never despised anyone politically more than bernie sanders this very moment and and i will say there's some vindication here because when people focused on hillary i always focused on bernie back in 2015 he was the movement candidate and you would have people on the right be very charitable and say you know i think bernie's wrong but i think he's a decent guy and i think he i think he wants what's best no no this is a man who supported the ussr this is a man who supported championed castro's cuba bread lines venezuela and people go yeah but he means democratic he says democrat socialism okay well what's bernie's view of socialism that's not democratic like what we see in brazil right now he said congratulations to lula on his extraordinary re-election victory in the brazilian presidential election because lula has stood up for brazilian workers and democracy and he will continue to do so in the next four years you know what's gonna happen so much democracy i need to change my socialist pants with the same information this guy he doesn't care no he's about democracy the left doesn't care about democracy and they will say that i'm a fascist because i don't believe in pure democracy i believe in a representative republic meaning those who can build and sustain a nation should vote and i would be furious if those people who are supposed to be be represented would have their voice stolen from them like we saw for the umpteenth time in south america latin america who else mum donnie democratic socialism even though your vote doesn't really matter he said the people united will never be defeated congratulations president lula and i mean look at the people here's the thing it would be if it's one-time example they support the castro regime there's no democracy there right they support the venezuelan regime they actually defended it said they were democratically elected there's no democracy there they supported the ussr back then they support socialism communist wherever it may exist even when they know that democracy is not at play when they know democracy is not an option and by the way as far as bernie and and mum donnie i mean their support the support for them is something to see as well by the way a couple a couple of additions to that aoc obviously came out and had another post macron has since come out and said this but look at the framing of all of this it's always that flavio barson uh bolsonaro sorry i almost said the wrong way he's the problem he's the strong man trying to come in and silence your voice right and the savior is the socialist right savior we're coming in to save democracy and i just want people to understand this if you're lost in some of these numbers and didn't watch friday's show and don't understand what this means imagine donald trump running against kamala harris and crushing the house crushing the senate governorships out the wazoo state houses out the wazoo and losing to kamala harris yeah that's i mean it wasn't as clean a sweep as that but very close to that and not being able to defeat the candidate that all of her other minions got defeated and it's a weak candidate and you need to understand this too because some folks will get it wrong and they'll go well these socialists you know they're revolutionaries at heart no they're not they're marxists and what do i mean by that um they're revolutionaries if they think that a violent revolution is the right means to an end they're anti-revolution once they have power right in other words they don't even want a democratic revolution against those in power against alula they don't want a revolution where people question election results they don't want a revolution where those on the populist right say you know what you don't represent us and we don't like these changes to the voting rules they don't want a revolution they want so-and-so and they don't want a revolution they don't want a revolution they don't want a revolution yeah subversion of your institutions subversion of education subversion of media subversion of government and then maintain power that's what marxism is about is you need the collective to attain power and then you never ever ever give it up so bolsonaro of course has refused to accept the election he said that he will seek to have it annulled by the way the new york times said it's very likely or it's possible that that could be the case they spoke to four legal scholars who all said that there are a lot of problems with this right so hey you would think that's a that's a peaceful revolution he's he's fighting what he views as corrupt results of the ruling class when the when the left right they talk about the ruling class let me ask you is there any more ruling class than someone who was president who was jailed for corruption got out because of appointed judges came back appointed his buddy to the supreme court and jailed his political opponents is there anyone more ruling class than that because that's who these socialists democratic socialists support and right now well within his rights bolsonaro said yeah we're actually we're actually not accepting the results of this election and what's the brazilian government well the lula they're already threatening to have his passport seized so that he couldn't leave the country that's the first well it's the first trans person uh elected its name is duda dude uh i'm not convinced not for me no i don't want to see juja at carnival it's actually pronounced in brazilian in portuguese it's pronounced dude it's pronounced we have the most beautiful women on the face of duda what the hell is that what is that that's in brazil we call abomination dude uh you should not you are in a front you you are in a front to my god god my god don't want to see duda no duda go away so duda where's my penis now let me ask you this it's important to see patterns the left says that that's that that's prejudice or they hate the left hates generalizations because um in accusing you of being simple they can't comprehend that we don't mean all people when we make a generalization when we go well you know we don't mean all people when we make a generalization when we go well you know we don't mean all people when we make a generalization when we go well you know we don't what uh asian americans tend to perform better in academics not all i'm sure you can find a chinese american immigrant who's a pothead burnout but as a general rule so they're always against these generalizations but here's why generalizations and broad strokes allow you to make assessments to recognize patterns and then problem solve based on the outliers to said patterns that's an important part of rational thinking so they consistently condemn it but let's let's go here do we see any patterns from the left across the world and in the united states or with elections in general let's see an unprecedented rule change an election yeah last minute kind of like violating your own state constitution changing to mass mail-in voting things like okay uh unprecedented voter turnout that has never occurred before or since uh like biden and donald trump despite no popularity going into the election public sentiment even though you had a complicit media have we seen that anywhere else and how about after the election that people question immediately moving to censor social media and control all media so that no one can question the results because it's misinformation have we seen that before this election in which we had to overcome interference coming from the outside in through digital platforms that we are going to have to regulate hey cheering that that's weird two cards it isn't possible that we don't realize that a crime in the digital world must be treated just like a crime in real life we cannot have monstrous and large companies earning millions and billions paying no taxes to this country and trying to steer the electoral outcome of this country oh so you mean like russian disinformation in 2016 yeah or or do you mean like in 2020 the hunter biden laptop and so do you mean you're going to create lula are you going to create something like uh i don't know a department of misinformation or does he mean for example he's going to ban rumble no wait he's already done that uh does he mean that he's going to reach out to meta and twitter and google and youtube as we saw in all of those files released and as admitted by zuckerberg it's almost like it's the exact same playbook and none of it is democratic it's weird how that all happens by the way there's a couple of other things i want to point out one thing i want to point out is that there is crashing they literally had to halt trading just now because of how much was flea it says 10 i saw some numbers that were even higher than that for a little while so the stock market nobody likes it right the other thing is high five says bernie sanders yeah exactly like oh no good the billionaire class no it could buy a lot of stock yeah yeah yeah sorry it's triggered at 10 fall not that it just fell 10 so yeah it has fallen that now the supreme court thing remember when uh bolsonaro was in here talking about the supreme court it's going to be nine percent fall not that it just fell ten percent so yeah it has fallen that now the supreme court thing remember when uh bolsonaro was in here talking about the supreme court it's going to be nine two now and the conservatives will only have two right it's going to be nine two so this is done for a little while so you're gonna have to deal with this if the election holds and again remember we had our own data team run the scenarios for this four out of the five scenarios that we ran had a virtually zero percent chance of lula winning that election right with all of that so the economy's crashing right now they had to halt trading the supreme court is about to be thrown out of balance rumble's not only banned but x is on the chopping block next because that's where a lot of this stuff is meta and google and those guys they're going to play ball they're going to do what they want them to do so you won't have access to information but they'll still have their brazilian government funded media yes you'll have that and you'll be able to seize the passports of anybody else out there and by the way there's a bunch of other bolsonaros in office and a bunch of other conservatives right now that are getting the message loud and clear it's going to cost you your life yep if you want to stand against this administration and just to be clear to the people of brazil and hopefully americans understand this um you can't vote your way out i've said this many times once socialists communists they're the same thing marxists once they attain power you cannot vote your way out so brazil i'm sorry you're past the point where voting is going to fix this there needs to be some outside interference if you guys want justice and then to americans bernie mamdani newsom aoc they all know that the brazilians can't vote their way out they all know that brazil has no democracy and they champion it anyway the same way they've championed venezuela chavez maduro fidel castro they have no problem with dictatorships and no problem in doing away with democracy once they reach levels of power if they attain the power here in this country that you see in brazil you would never be able to vote your way out either how do i know it's never on any other way historically so i don't have a quick fix for this right now but stateside if you need a helping hand with your mortgage i do know someone who can lend you one my girl likes it yo what up fam it's your boy d-day aka the grill master flash and we out here for the first annual d-day blockbuster party yeah we about to have everything man we're gonna have the ribs we got the chicken it's about to be lit dog hey daryl are those my slippers you're trying to light on fire it's called kindling dad i'm trying to make a tiktok and i told you for the 14 000 times my name is d-day d-day you're gonna give the whole neighborhood salmonella there's no meat out there i can see a big bag of stale hamburger buns and my emergency charcoal briquettes yo this is a vip pre-party you feel me all right the meat truck is on the way they coming through with the kobe beef they got the a5 wagyu it's gonna be mad real hey was that the doordash guy who just dropped off a single mcchicken that's my appetizer dad gosh you always hating listen if you want a backyard big enough for a real grill you should call american financing and get your own house you're 30 years old and i told you it ain't the right time right now the market is unstable it ain't time for a g like me to be tied down well american financing can get you a fixed rate it's not complicated you could be grilling something other than your mother's decorative gourd you're gonna need a fixed rate at the hospital when i serve you these hands son i'm just kidding i go to my room i'm sorry call the pros at american financing today at 1-800-974-6500 or visit www.americanfinancing.net slash crowder there you go and how do the uh hey how do the democratic socialists how do they make you think that they're there to help well they say hey uh everyone else is a national socialist did i say socialist i meant nazi everyone who's i'm a democratic socialist they're nazis don't ask them what the acronym actually stands for so remember woke 1.0 as aoc referred to it well that included things like cancel culture me too all of that, as well as referring to all of your political oppositions. namely those on the right as nazis the left doesn't want to do that they want to have civil dialogue right they want to do away with it except again john oliver can't help himself he has to say the quiet part out loud so listen the republican party's recently found itself answering some uncomfortable questions about nazi references nazi nazis nazi adjacent nazi nazi nazis nazis nazi nazi nazi nazi nazi bigotries white nationalism and nazi sympathies white nationalist loud bigotry a bigot nazis nazis racist slurs grand nazi bigots cranks and conspiracy theorists racist dog whistles a hitler apologist nazi loving nazis and non-nazis racism nazis white nationalist pro-white nationalist white nationalist the racist racism the white nationalist a rising chorus of white nationalist open neo-nazis and bigots it's time for the latest installment of john oliver is a pussy i am a pussy and that is frankly a wild thing to say i'm telling you i am a pussy oh sorry if this is how you found out but i'm telling you that i am a pussy so just to be clear here's how you know john oliver is very lazy first off he does a few shows a year and he collects his multi-million dollar checks with a whole staff of writers also he just parrots lines and he cannot be bothered to fact check fact check them or make them work in a cohesive way his entire segment here this installment which by the way i highly recommend you go watch all of it we can't we can't fact check all 36 minutes of it but we're going to do our best in rapid fire succession it's a self-defeating premise because he's saying that right right now the republican party has a real nazi problem but they've always been nazis well then why are you talking about it if we're just nazis now that means we're the same thing that we were yesterday right he hasn't thought this through i also want to present to you that john oliver has no problem lying to his audience um as seen by him parroting the very fine people lie and he never pulled it back you had some very bad people in that group but you also had people that were very fine people on both sides no no they weren't and i'll tell you why because if you are marching with white nationalists you are by definition not a very nice person and i'll tell you that he's honest okay john just one challenge present to people the whole tape before we get to anything else just present to them where he said i'm not talking about neo-nazis or white supremacists who should be condemned totally since you're all about nuance you're the party of nuance don't you think that would be relevant information i use that to self-estate set the stage self-defeating premise and a person who has no moral objection in lying to you let's go through his story and i'll tell you why he's honest okay john just one challenge present to people who should be condemned totally since you're all about nuance you're all about nuance you're the first claim uh the first claim that he makes right here you know what let's just play it and i'll pause because he rapid fires so much bullshit that uh everyone is a nazi in trump's republican party the republican party's recently found itself answering some uncomfortable questions about nazi references in fact on day one of trump's second term elon musk attracted attention after thanking trump supporters like this i just want to say thank you for making it happen thank you you 's a truth um of course none of that has anything to do with nazism whatsoever even the adl said that elon's uh motion was not a nazi salute this has been debunked a very long time ago everyone knows it the only person who still believes it might be you and perhaps bill burr let's continue candidates in texas made a video in which he showed off a gun that he called hitler's street sweeper and which featured him and a friend goose stepping to a nazi marching song truth put out material like this ice so uh that's brandon herrera who's been on the show he didn't celebrate nazis in any way he did a skit as a backdrop to this installment this video where he was shooting historical weapons he does that all the time he's clarified if you want to take it out of context you could do the same thing with someone who runs a history channel let's continue yes has put out material like this ice recruitment ad with a caption which way american man pretty clearly mirroring which way western man a book by a neo-nazi that's popular among white supremacists and this instagram post showing a beach with the words america after 100 million deportations captioned the peace of a nation no longer besieged by the third world tennessee's pause truth so of course these dhs posts they were references to the left's open borders mass migration right which of course was the single biggest issue for voting americans that election cycle in case you've forgotten 10 to 20 million approximately uh illegal aliens entered under biden and illegal aliens cost taxpayers anywhere from 150 to 451 billion dollars per year so he's referring to all of that there and uh that's not something anyone should apologize for let's continue also posted muslims don't belong in american society senator tommy tubberville's posted we must immediately ban all islamic true see your home country and just last month beau french republican candidate for texas railroad commissioner attracted a lot of attention after doing this french posted a photo of this group of students saying among other things quote social media is exposing how many americans have been displaced by foreigners it's everywhere and far worse than any of us could imagine okay here's the truth uh that post is completely accurate the ut austin their own statistics from 2012 to 2025 go check the references we make them available every single show white the white percentage of the student body went from 49 percent down to 29 percent and asia of course that includes south asian indians went from 19 to 26 so 49 to 29 19 to 26 that is a huge displacement of the population and massive shift in culture not to mention many people get there through the process of fraud his next claim that he makes is uh something about holocaust denial but just play data suggests many republicans especially younger ones are getting a lot more comfortable with things like holocaust denial the right-leaning manhattan institute recently conducted a survey that found nearly four in ten in the current gop believe the holocaust was greatly exaggerated or did not happen as historians describe with that number jumping to 54 among men under 50 okay here's the truth it was a one-day online poll it wasn't that recent and it asked if the holocaust was over-exaggerated potentially and it was overwhelmingly supported by hispanics and blacks 77 percent of the population said it was over-exaggerated and it was overwhelmingly supported by hispanics and blacks and hispanic respondents said over-exaggerated 66 percent of black only 30 percent of whites jeez you ain't got it worse than me yeah and again it blended deny holocaust or think it was over-exaggerated or overstated you can find me in 2012 saying i think the numbers may be overstated i don't think it's eight million it's probably closer to five or six million jews who were killed because i learned in school at centennial regional high school miss burman's class who by the way was a good teacher the number that we were taught was eight million what were you taught when you were younger ah metric system so i would have been part of that poll yeah maybe as a metric would you say that i was five six saying five to six million jews were the victims of genocide is that unreasonable i was taught eight once i did research i said that seems a little bit high also here's another truth democrats are statistically two times as likely to view hitler favorably than republicans so it wasn't a recent poll it was a it was an online snapshot poll asking if the holocaust was potentially over-reported or over-exaggerated uh overwhelmingly hispanics and blacks said yes while a small minority of white republicans said yes meaning only 30 percent of republicans said yes and democrats are twice as likely to view hitler favorably as republicans there you go check out all of the references this is how you know john oliver is lazy though i will say the left liking hitler favorably is a little bit more likely to view hitler favorably than republicans hitler the national socialist would make for an entertaining 2028 primary you think you just fell out of a coconut tree they all look the same to me it said one nation one future i thought it said one furor because there can be only one highland furor hitler just likes shitty films exactly that's and i'm a big fan of point break shoot this gun in the air go ah i feel his pain point break is a good flick and you will not say that why does he have long hair that's right also i'm a big fan of roadhouse he's a treasure you will not speak about him that way next claim that john oliver makes is uh republicans something have always been racist so i don't know why he's pitching now oh that's right he lies the far-right fringe currently rising up in his party is not remotely new from the john birch society through barry goldwater and pap buchanan the republican party has always left its door a jar for bigots cranks and conspiracy theorists have you ever listened to the nixon tapes they would do numbers on rumble today okay first off that was funny yeah it's probably true also yeah um and here's the truth none of his examples check out now i will say the nixon tapes it's bad for him toward everybody i mean it's bad bad towards jude's best bad towards the irish bad for democrats bad towards his own staff what kind of asshole would do this oh those jewish morons oh don't get me started on the irish but his track record i mean look check the references His administration, they sent Israel $825 million worth of weaponry during the Yom Kippur War. Yeah. As far as minority businesses, he created loan guarantees for, you know, small businesses that were minority owned. He promoted minorities in federal contracting. It can't be perfect in all facets. He also gave Indian tribes more autonomy in decision making. By the way, we did a Nixon three in three. You can go check those out. If you are not subscribed to that podcast, we release patches intermittently where it's three key facts in three minutes or less. The John Birch Society. Okay, let's go to that. It was an anti-communist group that did oppose the 1964 Civil Rights Act because they viewed it as communist infiltration. They also had black and Jewish members. Goldwater. Well, sure, he opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act on constitutional grounds. He also had a record of desegregation, to be clear. Now, the worst thing that the John Birch Society and Barry Goldwater have done in opposing the Civil Rights Act has been an outlier for Republicans in comparison to the Democrat Party, who opposed the Civil Rights Act. Who opposed the Civil Rights Act? Republicans passed the Civil Rights Act. The Democrat Party opposed it. It was 81% of the Republican Party. It was only about 61% of Democrats. Some of the longest filibusters in history were against the Civil Rights Act from Democrats. He goes to Buchanan. Okay, the GOP rejected him. He had to start his own party. And his first running mate, under the New York Times, his first new party, that was too racist for the Republican Party, was still a black woman. Come on, John. By the way, are we forgetting Kissinger, like the most Jewish Jew of Jewdom? Yeah. Come on. You wouldn't have let that guy anywhere near him if he was anti-Semitic. You'd be like, not that guy. Everybody else is fine, not him. And this is the thing, too. It's like, this is the reason that the left wants to control, as you see with Lula. This is the reason they want to control new media. This is the reason that they want to control online media. Because if they can't control it, then they can convince you that someone like John Oliver is my God talented, or deserves his spot, or is an intellectual in any capacity. This is the kind of guy who would get smoked in any form of debate or even informal conversation that simply broached the issues that he's covered on his show. I guarantee you he wouldn't remember any of it. He's just parroting what his leftist, woke, whatever you want to call it, staff tells him he has to. You can watch one segment and see how sorely uneducated he is. The whole thing is a self-defeating segment. Well, nowadays, the GOP has a big Nazi problem. By the way, every single Republican since World War II has been a Nazi in one form or another. We did an entire segment on that, by the way. Go watch it. It's called Every Republican is Hitler, A Complete History. Going back, World War II. Every Republican post-World War II. World War II was referred to as a Nazi, had swastikas painted, famous covers of magazines. Yes, that includes Nixon. Yes, that includes Reagan. Yes, that even includes Quayle. That includes George Bush, Dick Cheney, Mitt Romney, John McCain. Every single Republican since World War II has been referred to as a Nazi. So I've said this many times. The left is just the little boy who cried Nazi. They're the little boy who cried Hitler. And you know what? If you can't say it any better than the person who said it originally, I stand by what we all said in this studio once upon a time. I guess I'm Hitler. Stephen? No. I'm Hitler. I'm Hitler. I'm Hitler. I'm Hitler. No, I'm Hitler. I'm Hitler. No, I'm Hitler. I'm Hitler. I am Hitler. I'm Hitler. I'm Hitler. I'm Hitler. I am. Yeah, I'm Hitler. I'm Hitler. I'm Hitler. Okay, guys. Stop, stop, stop. Stop. I guess we all have a little more Hitler in us than we realize. We can all be Hitler. I love it. That concludes John Oliver is a big fat pussy. I am a pussy. And that is frankly a wild thing to say. I'm telling you, I am a pussy. Oh. Sorry if this is how you found out. But I'm telling you that I am a pussy. God. Whoa. I'm very conflicted with that statement because I love it. It's very good. But I also love Tom Jones. And I don't want to sully his good catalog or reputation. No, it's Tom Jones joining your team and saying, yeah, that guy. He's roasting him. Yeah, exactly. All right. See, now I've made it palatable for you. That makes sense. Yeah, John Oliver's pussycat. Yeah. Okay. All right. All right. I'll allow it. Did you say we have another clip that we're going to be- We had something that we can react to on Mom Donnie really quickly just on John Oliver. He goes into a few other areas here that prove, again, like he knows nothing of what he's talking about, right? He goes after Nick Fuentes and some other people. And he even goes after J.D. Vance. And he goes after the kids. He goes after Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson, who are either not voting or voting Democrat. So he goes after, yeah, exactly. They're not really big Trump supporters. He goes after Tucker and Nick in the same breath, not knowing that Tucker and Nick are fighting. And that it wasn't like Tucker gave him like a hard interview. He did it after. Anyway, it's all convoluted. Goes after J.D. Vance. But then goes after, you remember those kids in the group chat that were making jokes that they shouldn't have been making? Yeah, yeah, yeah. I saw that too. And he goes after all of them. All of them throws their faces back up there. Like, that's a really important thing. And the one thing, just this is the most dishonest part of it. There was a 10-year-old post by one of these politicians who said, this is his grandfather. And we mentioned it, right? And he said, I know I almost hesitated not to post this. This is the only one we have. I just want to thank all those who served. He fought for his country. He wasn't saying like, I'm supporting the Nazi regime or anything like that. But he's saying, do you understand that German men were forced to fight? Do you understand that German men were conscripted into fighting for their country? And this is my grandfather. And I don't like it. And maybe he didn't either. And John Oliver picks that out and says, that's an example of somebody supporting Nazism without any other information. If there had been other information, fine. But there was nothing else. And it's a 10-year-old Facebook post or whatever, Instagram. Everything the left touches, they ruin from not only government, but I mean, to human interactions and hobbies. Let's go through that. Family. Family. Respecting the head of the household. Father. No, it's become, screw you. Screw you, dad. And mom wears the pants. Okay. Hey, male-female interactions. Men have to check out because they're concerned. They can, there can be retroactive removal of consent. Hobbies. There used to be plenty of people, by the way, who collected World War II memorabilia. Tons. And it was considered a prized possession. Nazi memorabilia. Nazi memorabilia specifically. Yeah. Yeah. Especially stateside because it was more rare. You can't do that anymore. All of this. Just, hold on a second. You can't include, that's what happened with the Vox Apocalypse. Because I don't know. Because I made fun of someone at Vox. Google demonetized basically half of YouTube and included channels that weren't political that simply had historical documentaries involving the Nazis. The left, the party of nuance. They always, you know why they remove context consistently? Because context helps you to understand content. They don't want you to understand content. For the same reason they don't provide the references and they always appeal to authority. It's no, no, no. You should. You should trust us. Context matters at least as much as content. And as it relates to hobbies, as it relates to creative endeavors, comedy, film, it's even more important. The left ruins everything they touch. Race relations are worse because of the left today. Gender relations are worse because of the left today. Faith in government is worse because of the left today. Families are more broken apart. People have fewer hobbies and fewer social engagements and fewer social support structures because of the left today. And all of it was warned about, by the way, just that last one during COVID, right? We were suspended for saying, hey, this is going to be terrible. Locking people down and keeping kids home. You are going to create a generation of people who are emotionally, socially stunted and very likely addicts. And sure enough, we see that now. Hey, wait, wait, wait, wait a second. You guys are going too far. You're going to create a generation of men and women who are afraid of each other and circle each other and tiptoe around. When you do this with the new marriage laws, careful, you're going to actually incentivize divorce and you're going to incentivize the destruction of the nuclear family. Hey, wait, wait, careful. And you know what? I'm warning you the same thing will happen. They do it with the Electoral College. Same thing will happen. They pack the Supreme Court. You will get Brazil, Lula. You will get Castro, Cuba. That's what they want. Know that the left sells you the Scandinavian model. Denmark, Norway, Sweden, even though they were built on capitalist models effectively and they have more social safety nets. They sell you the Scandinavian model, but what they implement is a South American model. Always. That's why you see them praising it. While they call you a Nazi. Speaking of which, what's the mum done? So, yeah, I mean, you know, they like to tell how much elections are secure and everything, even though you don't need your IDs. It's pretty self-explanatory, but it's funny to watch. Nonetheless. OK, well, you know, actually, we're going over time here. So if you are not yet a Rumble Premium member, Mug Club is Rumble Premium. Rumble Premium is Mug Club. And by the way, that's what allows us to do all these projections, go through all the data, procure the same news wires that mainstream left media has and cover the election as we will. November 3rd at 7 p.m. It's your one stop. You don't need to go anywhere else. Most accurate and by far the most entertaining drinking game rules to follow if you're not yet a member. Hey, you don't get to continue watching us, but you get to continue watching Haley Karania for free. Let me see this shit. At our elections this year, here's what every New Yorker should know. Voting is easy and safe. In New York City, you don't need to bring anything with you to cast your vote at the polls. Neither do you when you go eat a rice bowl. Voting is easy and safe.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. The Brazilian presidential election appeared to be stolen through unprecedented rule changes, including a last-minute two-hour voting extension granted by a Supreme Court justice, which flipped betting odds overnight.
  2. The election results defy mathematical logic
  3. The ruling change bypassed standard electoral oversight, with only certain areas receiving extensions, and evidence suggests the decision was politically motivated to favor Lula.
  4. International figures including Bernie Sanders, Gavin Newsom, and Macron celebrated the outcome, despite supporting socialist regimes with known authoritarian tendencies like Venezuela and Cuba.
  5. The show criticizes the "democratic socialist" narrative as a cover for authoritarianism, arguing that once in power, such movements oppose democratic accountability and seek to dismantle institutions.
  6. There is a pattern of post-election censorship, media control, and suppression of dissent globally, including online platforms and social media, to prevent scrutiny of election outcomes.
  7. The segment mocks John Oliver’s claims that Republicans have a "Nazi problem," highlighting contradictions, factual inaccuracies, and a self-defeating premise that fails to distinguish between fringe views and mainstream politics.
  8. The analysis draws a parallel between Brazil’s alleged election fraud and U.S. political risks, warning that once socialist or leftist groups gain power, democratic processes cannot be restored through voting alone.

Summary:

The transcript argues that Brazil's recent presidential election was likely stolen through unprecedented, politically motivated rule changes—such as a last-minute two-hour voting extension granted by a Supreme Court justice—leading to mathematically impossible vote shifts. The results defy historical precedent, with Lula gaining nearly 11 million votes despite losing endorsements from right-leaning candidates. The voter turnout and timing of the rule change suggest manipulation, and the decision to extend voting bypassed standard electoral oversight, particularly in areas favoring the opposition.

The narrative is further undermined by the global celebration of the outcome by figures like Bernie Sanders and Macron, who support socialist regimes with known authoritarian tracks, such as Venezuela and Cuba. The show critiques the so-called "democratic socialism" ideology as a cover for anti-democratic governance, arguing that such movements reject democratic accountability once in power. It also highlights a pattern of post-election censorship and media control worldwide, including digital suppression, to silence dissent.

A major point of criticism is John Oliver’s claim that Republicans have a "Nazi problem," which is dismissed as self-defeating, factually inaccurate, and based on selective examples. , where similar risks may emerge. The segment concludes by asserting that the events in Brazil signal a broader global trend of election interference, media manipulation, and the erosion of democratic norms.

FAQs

The transcript claims the Brazilian election was 'stolen' due to unprecedented rule changes, voter turnout anomalies, and a lack of mathematical consistency in the results, suggesting fraud and manipulation by the ruling establishment.

A last-minute extension of voting hours was granted by a Supreme Court justice, reportedly only in certain areas, which occurred just three minutes after polling closed and significantly altered the betting odds.

The transcript claims the vote shift defies math, as Lula gained over 11 million votes despite losing in the first round, while Bolsonaro only gained 3.5 million, suggesting irregularities or fabricated votes.

Bernie Sanders and other democratic socialists are criticized for supporting socialist regimes like Venezuela and Cuba, which the transcript argues lack democracy and are not genuine democratic systems.

Yes, the transcript argues that democratic socialists, once in power, do not believe in voting as a way to correct governance and instead seek to subvert institutions, making them anti-democratic in practice.

The transcript dismisses John Oliver's claims as self-defeating and factually inaccurate, arguing that the Republican Party has never had a 'Nazi problem' and that such accusations are politically motivated and misinformed.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.