The speaker reflects that global fame and financial success have not altered his fundamental level of personal contentment, comparing life's challenges to aerodynamic resistance. He argues that Western society is built on a foundational lie—promising freedom, democracy, and the "American Dream" while delivering a highly controlled system that breeds public cynicism. Unlike other nations unified by external threats, the West lacks a common enemy, so it uses the illusion of freedom, often manifested through social permissiveness in "degenerate" but inconsequential areas, to maintain cohesion. He criticizes a deliberate cultural shift to suppress masculine traits and individual potency to foster a docile populace. Ultimately, he contends that the powerful, whether street criminals or Wall Street bankers, often operate with similar self-serving psychopathy, with the key difference being their capability and the system's sanctioning of their actions. This realization leads many to feel exploited and angry upon discovering they've been deceived about their potential for wealth and true autonomy.
You know, I got asked about this yesterday, it's funny, because someone asked me, and they said, "What's it actually like to be globally famous?" And I tried to explain that truthfully, there's no light without dark, and every positive has a disadvantage, and there's always good and bad to everything. But I feel like you are always at the same level of contentment. It's kind of like as a man, you're at a certain level of contentment with who you are. Some people are super depressed, some of them are super happy, but I'm no more or less content than I was when I was a struggling fighter who couldn't pay the bills. But you're happy with who you are and you're doing your best, and you have a certain mindset, a certain happiness level. And then you may transgress through the world of finance and global startup, etc. But you get there, and then you have all the disadvantages that come with that. And then you have the advantages also, I'm not complaining, you know, more money, more problems, but Alicia Rich. But then you're at the same level of contentment. I don't think you're any more or less content anywhere along the journey. I don't feel any different than 2019 if that makes sense. It's really interesting when I try and analyze my successes and how well I've done across the last few years. And I feel like it's pretty similar to air resistance. As a car is trying to go faster and faster, the wall of air, it's competing against gets stronger and stronger. And I do believe like where you get to in your life is down to how aerodynamic you are as an individual. How much stress can you adopt? Because there was a huge, there was many points along this journey I could have slowed down and stopped and not go where I was because there was pressure pushing against me. But me and my big mouth kept pushing against it back because my engine was powerful. And other than you end up in a crazy situation, which I'm currently in, which is the democratic government telling the Romanians to try and shut me up. So it's really interesting how it all works out. I guess I it would be foolish of me to say I didn't want to be here. You're like, when I was in jail, I said to Tristan, I kept saying that they're going to put us in jail. And I kept saying we have to try and not go to jail, but I kept talking. Don't you feel like I wouldn't call itself sabotage, but it's kind of just like, you know, you know where things end and you still do them. Isn't it the same with an addict? A drug addict who knows where it ends and he keeps doing drugs or you keep fucking that crazy girl? Or you know where it ends? It's kind of weird how the human mind works. But you know what, I'm a hundred, I'll stay right here. I'm 100% dangerous. They're going to use this against me in court, but fuck them. I think every man is supposed to be. I mean, I can be dangerous. I control myself, but I have the capability to be dangerous completely. I think all men should be. That's the reason liberals hate me so much because they're scared of me. They see me as a big threat and danger. If you look at the best men on earth, they all have the capability to be dangerous. It's a tenant to masculinity, but yeah, I mean, maybe if I was unhinged, I guess I could be dangerous, but then I think anybody can be dangerous when they're unhinged. I think that trying to be intense and making sure that I'm very intent with what I do and making sure that I, in fact, I'm going to change that answer. I feel like perhaps if I were to analyze this from the outside, I feel like one of the primary objectives, perhaps of the matrix, is to make men hide the fact that they're dangerous. Aren't men going through the world now trying to prove how dangerous they aren't? Like, think about it. Hi, I was sitting with my girl the other day. We were watching TV, watching Netflix, and then we turned Netflix off to the annoyed meme, and watched something else in it. And I said, "Why are all these dudes faggot?" And she goes, "They're not all gay." I'm like, "No, no. I'm not talking about the gay ones. I'm talking about the straight ones. They're gay." Like, there's nothing masculine about them. It's like they're trying so hard to prove they're not a threat all the time. And I don't believe that that's accidental. I believe that's very intentional. I think a lot of men have been si-opted to trying to prove how passive they are, so they don't come across as a threat. I understand why if you work in corporate or whatever, whatever. But that's not a concern of mine. If you look at me and think, "Oh, he might be dangerous." I don't give a shit. Like, that doesn't cross my mind. And I think a lot of men never used to care. But now there seems to be a concerted and deliberate effort for men to prove that they're not a threat to anybody. Well, I'm attracted by it because there are people who get to reject the conformity. They get to reject the rules. I really don't think there's much difference inside of the mentality of, I mean, there's certainly difference in capability. If you look at a street criminal on a wall street banker, there's difference in capability. But is there really difference in intent? Is there really difference in, you know, the mentality? You sit here and you argue that someone who steals a loaf of bread is a thief and someone who works at Wall Street isn't a thief. You're just talking about differences in capability. I don't think you're talking about differences in mentality. The people who own the world today are perfectly prepared to rob everybody. And they're going to steal everything as much as they can. And they're going to do it. And they're going to sleep just fine. And it's not going to cross their mind. It's not going to bother them. So we sit there and say, "A drug dealer is terrible. Arms dealers are terrible people." You're like, "Okay, yeah." I mean, that's an easy one to paint to the general consensus of the population of the normies. Arms dealings bad. But if you look at most of the things that are happening at the highest level, I mean, arms dealing isn't even bad at the highest level. But all the things that are happening at the highest level are just as bad, if not worse. So I think that once you understand that you don't want to live a normal life and you don't want to conform, then you're going to try and find the people who aren't living a normal life. And unfortunately in Luton, there's not many high-level Wall Street bankers. So you just end up seeing the people doing everything else. And then this becomes a question of morality. And you have to sit there and go, "Yeah, are these people genuinely any worse than the people who run in the world today?" I don't know. They are. I don't think they are. I mean, the people who run the world today think of some of the decisions they make. I mean, I don't want to get you in a jail cell, but fuck it. You may as well go, because I went. So I'm going to put it on your podcast. You talk about the Secretary of Defense of America sitting there deciding millions of young men need to die. Yeah. I mean, are these good people? Are they moral people? Like, are they better than the person who sell and crack to kids? Are they better than the person who's stealing bread? Are they better than the people who are robbing houses? Sending 200,000 people to get blown to smithereens by Russian artillery for their own banking interests. So their stock goes up. I mean, this is just the world. Anybody who's not conforming seems to operate to a degree with this level of psychopathy. All of them do. And if you don't have that psychopathy, fine. Then you fall somewhere within the herd, but that herd is just getting experimentally. Now you're in the perm exploitation herd. Then you have to sit there and go, "Okay, well, do you want to be a little bit dangerous, a little bit psychopathic, a little bit sociopathic, or do you want to be exploited?" I don't know. I mean, that's another question for people to answer, but I guess I made my choice. Completely. And you're completely right. And it's actually interesting because in the movie The Matrix, when he's sitting at the second one with the architect, and Neo doesn't believe what the architect's saying. This is a architect, so. There you go. And the architect's saying the only reason we allow you to do what you do is so that you can find the other people whose minds which are trouble, and you can free them, and you can go be a problem, but most people stay within the system. Which is also, I guess, perhaps to a degree. I consider myself more fierce more than Neo, but I guess that's me. I'm looking for the other people whose minds want to be freed, but I don't want the entire matrix to crumble. Like, when I like the fact that a lot of people do believe in the bullshit, because it would be stupid of me to think, "Nobody should think like I think." Well, now we have chaos. There's no order left when everybody thinks like I think. I can look at the system and realize it's all bullshit, but you do need most people to believe in the system. And you're right. There's different systems and different places on the planet, but there's a system everywhere. And then you're right. We've become very cynical about the West. And I used to shale on the West all the time, but you have to be kind of careful when you do it, because what's the alternative? You know, like I was talking to someone the other day, and they were saying, "You know, the West is all corrupt. We talk about democracy, and we don't believe in democracy. We talk about justice. We don't believe in democracy. Look what we did to Assange, and I'm like, completely true. But if Assange was in China, and he was anti-Chinese, he'd be dead. If he was in Russia, and he was anti-Russian, he'd be dead. If he was anti-Saudi, inside your area, he'd be dead. Okay, he did some Velmarsh, but he's alive. Are we the best of a bad bunch now? I don't know. I mean, as bad as the West is, are we still the best of a bad bunch? If you look at the rest of the world, in many ways we are, I mean, Trump's just won so we can pray for a revival. But the whole idea of democracy and justice and all these things we've based ourselves on, I think the reason people are so angry and cynical now is because it's a lie. And this is a unique thing about it, because China never based itself on freedom. So like, it's never based on self-on-freedom. So if you're living in China and the government's suppressing you, you're not like, this is unfair, you're kind of like, well, that's the game I'm living. The West, we have this disconnect from people who can think for themselves or people who can't. The people who can think for themselves are very, very angry at the West and very, very angry at Western leaders, because they're like, you lied to me. You told me this was democracy, it's not. You told me this was freedom, it isn't. You told me judges were fair, they're not. You told me the Department of Education was educating my children, they're not. You told me doctors kept me alive, they don't. You told me it's this lying that I think has upset us more, because if you're actually smart enough to analyze it from the outside and go, okay, forget the lie, but actually look at the system as bad as it is in the West, is it better anywhere else? I mean, the way I've pissed off Western governments and what they put me through here in Romania, yeah, inconvenient, fine. But if I would have pissed off Russia, and I was in, if I pissed off Putin the way I pissed off the West, I'd be dead. There's a bomb lie. So it's like, it's kind of hard to measure. It's like, it's all a big, bad bunch. I think a lot of people are just very upset they've been lied to in the West. And you're right, the reason, well, you're right, everyone has to believe a lie. The biggest problem we have in the West is that the lie we've told is so untenable. They're like, yeah, that's right. And you know what's really interesting, because if we talk about it from the sheep's herd perspective, it's interesting, because this also ties into race, because we talk about race a lot, and I'm mixed race, and I talk to both sides of it, and people talk about how racial identities unify people, and I agree with it, and I understand, because in the West, we're constantly now searching for something to unify us, because we don't have it. And if you look at most other countries, what they are actually unified by, as a flock of sheep, is fear of the wolves. So you can have all these different colored sheep with different religions from different places, from Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Muslims, Christians, you name it, Eskimos on one side.
white Christians on the other side, but they're all Russian and they're all unified behind the Russian flag because the wolves are outside. So their sheep herd is unified by fear of the wolf. They're not saying to their sheep they're free. They're not saying to their sheep they even have any degree of liberty. In fact it's pretty much the opposite. They say we have a big fence and we're gonna have a big wall and we may call you up to fight the wolves but we have to or all dead. We're unified by that. We're isn't the West because of the dominant power. We don't really have an enemy that we truly believe in anymore. We used to a bit after 9/11 and the Patriot Act of this crap and they're all coming to kill us. People are a bit too weak for that now. It's trying to convince the average person that a farmer in Yemen is gonna get on a fucking robo and come take your house in Tennessee. It's gonna be difficult to do, right? So we're not unified by this common enemy and then you have to ask yourself is there anything else that can truly even unify people because we're now unified by the idea that we're free. So all the sheep are looking at the fence going well if we're free, why is there a fence? Why are there so many laws? Why am I told what to do? Why do I have to pay so many taxes? If I'm so free, how come this fence is actually the biggest fence of all the other sheep herds? Because we have the biggest fences with the most laws. It's like so what is this freedom garbage? And this is where you go into the degeneracy argument. I've said this before but I'm gonna say it again. I truly believe one of the reasons they promote degeneracy is so they can convince you that the freedom is real because the freedom is a big lie. So they have to take the one sheep who's you know a little bit special and say well you know he can put a rain, he can have a rainbow fleece on. He's allowed to do that and the other sheep herds you can't do that because we're free. So they allow you to do all the degenerate things you can't do anywhere else to try and convince you you're free but you can't do anything actually important and you can't resist your enslavement and you can't resist power and in many ways you're less free than in other places. And this is where the race argument comes in because I've discussed this with a lot of people and they say yeah so we need to be unified by race and I sit there and I say I agree with you. I understand how that's tempting especially in the modern western world. I understand that having your ethnicity released replaced and erased is extremely upsetting. But then even if you look back has that ever worked? Like when it was all white people in America there was the northerans versus the southern or you're from that state or you're from that town or you know if you had if you got if Ireland was all white again today there'd be a argument between Dublin and Belfast they start arguing again. So we always find a line to divide ourselves on unless we are unified by a common enemy and this is actually why a lot of the countries in the world do what they do. This is why North Korea on the news every single day threatens America. It's not because they're gonna go to war with America they don't really want to go to war with America they won't sovereignty but they don't want to get annihilated but they know the best way to keep their population unified is to talk about the size of the wolf and we don't have a wolf anymore in the west so the only thing that unifies us is this imaginary guys of freedom and the second thing that unifies us is that we supposedly we can get rich supposedly. Be nice to each other you can do whatever you want but you can't but you can get rich and that's where society's starting to get into because I think the reason a lot of people are actually just contented as you just talked about the reason a lot of people are upset is they've realized they've been lied to about a lot of things and the final most most insulting lie is that I don't even get to be rich at the end of this you know you move to America and you're like yeah yeah yeah yeah I want to get rich. American dream what's the American dream be nice to everyone irregardous of their skin color or religion get rich once people are starting to wake up now and realizing go away I'm never gonna be rich and everyone at the top is rich the shepherds are rich off me and I never get to be rich that's where the discontentments coming in I think I saw a lot of the actual anger is coming and Russia doesn't promise its people they get to be rich China doesn't promise China doesn't say on the news every day you get to be a rich person in fact I'd actually argue with the opposite they say you get to go work at a factory be thankful we're the only people who are saying you're gonna be rich you can do whatever you want and then you're not rich and you can't do whatever you want so you're pissed and that's how I think we go here well you know just it's kind of interesting I've never heard this before but it's super true because they go hand in hand right as they try to make you docile that is directly negatively correlated to your competence and individuality and capabilities which makes you more angry because you're a loser which means you need to be more docile so they kind of go hand in hand so the better the manager gets at making you docile the more docile you need to become because the more angry you are I tweet something this morning on my way to court for human trafficking and I tweet it Western government in a nutshell is the fact that Germany sold its Bitcoin last month at 53,000 they've lost 1.8 billion at the current price let alone where it's going to be in 10 years from now and the the amazing thing about this is Western government in a nutshell is no protests nobody cares no review no one's responsible no accountability no one's even the government's even going to talk about it no one's going to be held up on TV and be made accountable for what they've done no explanation why they've done it they just did it and everyone just goes oh well the government's so dumb oh well let me just keep paying my taxes you talk about docile people are so docile now that they brag about how stupid their leaders are I sit there with people in the like all the you know the the mem mem MPs in with her idiots I'm like yeah they are but they are boss you're right they're idiots I agree they're idiots but you're even more stupid because they're running you you know it's truly crazy so you're right it's incentives is a really interesting way to look at it I've never thought of it that way before but the more docile they make you the more you need them because you're incompetent and then by exchange the more angry you get due to your own incompetence so the more docile you have to become so what's their end goal I heard somebody else very smart say one day that the end goal of every government is always combing is because new laws are passed every single day and this is what Elon Musk is trying to do right now he's trying to put in some kind of limit for laws if you pass a law there needs to be a time limit until it's reviewed because you make a law and you forget about it new laws are passed every day and laws are never taken away so every single day you are less free than you were before we will talk about the sheep herd and talk about freedom we have these signs everywhere freedom but every day our wall actually gets smaller because there's a new law every day nobody even knows what they are well let's let's talk about human trafficking when people said human trafficking to me before before this garbage I went through I was like human trafficking yeah sounds bad I mean okay you'll you beat someone up and you you put them in chains and then you drag them somewhere and yeah that's like entrapment and incur like a false imprisonment I get what human trafficking is until you end up being charged with human trafficking and you're like what the fuck bro I give you an example there's another person right now currently in Romania who I've spoken to in court they're going through a human trafficking case it's a woman who had these women from Thailand and Bali working for her doing massage and she had a massage parlor and one of those girls ended up sleeping with one of the customers and decar saying she met him at the massage parlor and the owner of the massage parlor who was charged with human trafficking it's like okay I'm like okay so you're bringing girls from Thailand and they're having sex with people and you've human trafficking for sexual slavery she's saying no I flew in masseuses to give massages and one of those massages slept with a cut with a customer outside of business hours outside of the business premises how am I even supposed to know this is happening do you call it don't give a shit they write up human trafficking sexual exploitation trafficking across so what is human trafficking well they she transported them she moved them from Thailand on a plane that's the transport for what for profit because they give massages yeah cuz of masseuses like they just tick all these boxes never for you know it does indictments being thrown around it's like what the fuck is this well the thing is bite because there's so many laws you don't you don't have time to understand any of them until you're already caught up in it it's only when they've already hit you with the bullet it's not you can't avoid bullets you have to get shot first to find out what caliber it is before you can call the medic so this poor woman who I spoke to in court who's on the verge of suicide is like they're saying I transport these women here for sex that I did the transport and I financial exploitation because they worked you know eight hours a day and but look she just tried to open a fucking massage parlor but this process what's this prosecutor's incentive you want to talk about incentives what does a prosecutor do the same prosecutor is coming after me why who gives a shit type it up right out when sent into the judge the judge decides I don't give a shit if I'm right or wrong what's my incentive I need to just get cases that's my job I want a promotion so I'm not the only person in Romania or the world charged with bullshit human trafficking I didn't realize that human trafficking wasn't what I thought it was it's actually a bullshit vague term that they just attack anyone with when they decide to it's interesting when you talk about the inflation of language and how languages are different and they're in control they do that the most with wars you know when when we attack someone it's a tactical strike tactical tactical precision I mean that's blowing up a school by the way I mean and if you were to see a video of this tactical strike you would see and that's why for the first time ever people are actually outraged about Gaza Israel because we can see it it's been going on forever but now we can see it these tactical strikes are children without arms being dragged out of rubble you know but when when the bad guy attacks his brutality Hamas is brutal murder Hamas is Hamas is barbaric actions when they went on October 7th but we replied tactical strikes it's all bullshit it's bullshit narrative control and it's actually very interesting because of all the things they could have charged me with that's another reason they choose to things they do once you look at somebody's reputation you talk about someone sticking their head above the herd now you have all these very vague laws right and they can apply nearly anything to anyone so once the sheep sticks his head above the herd we you have to sit and say okay well if we martyr this man
and the other sheep will back him up. So we have to make this person disliked by the herd. We can't just put him back in the herd. Otherwise the herd will be like, whoa, you stuck your head up and you came back here alive. How was it? Should I try? You know? Wow, you have a Bugatti, a sheep Bugatti. Let me try that. No, they have to get rid of that idea. So they're like, he stuck his head up. He used to go back with a bad reputation. They can't take, I mean, they're going to charge me with tax for all of this crap. Nobody cares, because nobody wants to give their fleece to the fucking owners in the first place. So if you say, oh, you didn't give the owner all your fleece, it's gonna be like, hey, good, fuck them. What do they do with it anyway? So they have to get something heinous. And unfortunately now, especially against men, but all these varied versions of sexual crimes are now so vague that they can attack anybody with any of it at any time. And now you're stuck trying to defend yourself and there's still people inside the herd who are like, oh my God, did you hear about him? It really is amazing to me, but I mean, these people still believe in the vaccine. So what the fuck can you do? But what's right and wrong anymore? Everything is subjective now. Nothing is right or wrong at the point where it's hard to have a hard line on almost anything. That is the bottom line of masculinity in general is having a hard line on things. That's why they fear Trump, because he says, I'm deporting you. And they're like, oh, but what if, and they come up with their what ifs? Their exceptions that disprove the rules, their subjectalities, that's all the female mindset. And that's what they want everyone to think like. They want you, all the thing is subjectiveness. So when they say, I'm gonna deport this person because they're here illegally. Somebody who is masculine goes, okay, they're there illegally, they broke the law, deport them fine. But the subjective mindset would go, but how long has he been here? But did he commit a crime? But did he go to work? Has he got a family? Does he help his neighbor? Did he cut his grass? Maybe not him. And then it all goes down the rabbit hole, right? Of the rabbit hole of endless subjectivity, the rabbit hole of endless inaction, endless whatever. The reason they fear Trump is because he's the kind of person who just goes, no, that's the line. And that's what they don't like. You're right, they want everything now in this big cloud of constant and endless possible confusion. Yeah, it's two, it's two mindsets. There's people who believe morality comes from parameters and people who believe morality is having no parameters at all. I think you nailed it, we just said it there. That those system, the matrix, whatever you want to call them, they try very hard to conflate, docile and passive and inept with moral. Oh, he lets anyone around him do whatever they want. So he's a good person. When the truth is, if you actually look at history, it's been the absolute opposite, the good people, the heroes, the men did not allow people to do whatever they wanted. And that morality has convinced the Western world now into committing the largest act of suicide that we're gonna ever see in probably modern history. I mean, the level of cuckedum that the average Western government is operating under is fucking ridiculous. They're allowing to, they're giving up the safety of their native females and they're giving up their lands to people who don't respect their culture because they're good. Oh, but I'm nice, I'm moral. And it's crazy how we've completed that. When true morality would be standing on the beach head with a spear saying, you don't come here. But this is it, right? So this is it. So they've even reversed it completely because masculine morality has always been in the defense of things. That's what we've been for. The good men went to war to defend. But now because everything's turned on its head and there's no war, war were fighting and all the people who were in charge of everything they're trying to make us as docile as possible. And everything's so inverted. Now morality is allowing the people who are advocating for illegal immigrants to come and rape the native women and bring drugs and commit murders. Believe they are moral. They believe they are good people for allowing these undocumented people to turn up and destroy society. They believe they're moral for that. And that's what's truly scary. The scariest thing between these two opposing tribes, the people who think for themselves and believe in parameters and resisting the matrix and the people who believe in the matrix. When you talk to the people who believe in the matrix, you try and explain to them why the world voted for Trump. Like the America voted for Trump to fix things. And the reason they don't get it is because they don't think anything is broken. Yeah, that's it. That's what's scary. What's scary is they won't even say, yeah, it's broken, but he's not the answer. They're gonna say what's broken. A legal immigrant, so. You're like, because a country needs a border to be a country. Well, that explains why hot girls are conservative and why ugly girls are liberal. Because hot girls are conservative. 'Cause they're like, I'm hot and I like me. And I like the way I act and I like the way I think. And I like the way I look. And I want my kids to look like me. And then you have the other patrols who hate themselves. They won't admit they hate themselves, but they do by proxy. So they're committing suicide by proxy. It's their internal hate that they're trying to project outwards. It's kind of interesting. I love to sit with the liberal. I don't debate liberals anymore. I mean, Destiny couldn't afford my fee. And even if he tried to, I'm not gonna sit and debate with these people because one of the things I'm gonna try and do with all my money is avoid all these scum. Life's punished him. But I would love to have a conversation with them and say, what would be the line that would make you not be liberal anymore? Like if the government said you all had to chop off your little finger, and is that the line for you? But they come up with a reason because of immigrants, gays, whatever, chop it off. Now we'll give you anesthetic. You don't really need it. Study after study about how you never really use it. The main street media talks about how unimportant it is. Everyone's holding a cup without one. People start talking on the view and on MSNBC about how much better life is without one. You know, ever since I chopped mine off, my hand feels so light and so mobile. And before you know it, and then is that the line? Or does it have to go up a digit? Well, what about your middle finger? Where does the point come where you finally realize you're being exploited? Or do you hate yourself so much? So viscerally that you're happy to just go to the end. You're happy to just get shot in the head. Because it's self-hatred. Everything they purport and push for humanity is just destruction because they hate themselves. And they want society to pay a price by extension because God managed to make them trolls. And it's self-hatred. It's a death cold. And I'm wondering, is there any line to wake these people up? I don't know if there even is. So then you sit and say, well, why am I debating? This goes into my point about why I won't debate with them. Debate with who? About what? You're just born to fucking lose. You've all, people like you have always been born to lose. And when people like you met me in every period of human history, on every geographical location on the planet, you were destroyed every single time. Now you have the internet. I'm supposed to sit here with you and talk about it. But anywhere else you were gone. You were history. Fuck these people. But yeah, it's interesting the huge ideological divide. It's very interesting because morality, we just talked about, I believe morality is being prepared to kill others, to protect who you-- That's what morality is. And it's kind of crazy that liberals try and pretend it's something else that morality is acceptance of all things. Because that's hypocritical in and of itself. When you call the police, you expect them to kill the bad guy. Now I don't believe in violence. I'm moral, cops. So what do you expect them to do? You want them to shoot whoever's causing you the problem, right? So I agree with your morality. The morality is violence to defend what I believe in. If you're going to sit there and you accept everything and you think that makes you a good person, well, you're advocating destruction of your civilization. We can go down to gender path about why females are more likely to think this way because they're incapable of violence. So females are less likely to have a differing opinion because they can't defend that opinion. There's a whole bunch of pretty basic psychology to explain these things. But it is interesting because that is the plague of the Western world currently. The plague of the Western world currently is this decision on what is morality. And if morality is going to be this version of it that they're trying to purport by the MSM, then the only end result is destruction. If morality is accepting everything, then the end result is destruction. Accepting anyone coming from anywhere who wants to do anything they want and think however they want and talk whatever language they want and exploit the system any way they want. You're gonna lose. You can't do that. You need to have a strong, it's kind of interesting. If I had to have a country and I had to accept immigrants small around the world, I would actually say, okay, if we're going to do this for whatever reason, then they need to come in and adhere to our moral code. We need to have stronger morals, not less. We don't need to be accepting of everything. They need to turn up and they need to believe these 25 points. They need to repeat them every day and they need to say them every day. And their existence within our state is contingent on believing in these things. That is a matter of color they are. Doesn't matter what religion they are. 'Cause these things at least unite the people. We've done the absolute opposite. We said you can come with your own morals and we're moral 'cause we let everyone else have their own morals. Freedom. No, it's true. No, it's not, you know what, that liberals are at battle with their own instincts. No, no, I've never heard this before. Women don't want kids if they're liberal. Mendo want to resist depression if they're liberal. Mendo want to defend their society and defend their land and defend their women if they're liberal. They're at war with their own instincts. And I guess the reason why they do something like how straight themselves is try and make those instincts go away. Otherwise, you're left with the eternal feeling of cowardice, right? Does it come down to a degree of bravery? I'm not sure. But if you feel instinct to defend something but you're afraid to defend it and you don't act to defend it, you either have guilt or you have to then go and suffer the consequences of defending it. So there's two loot, there's two sides, but you're right. Liberals are at war with their own instincts, which has to evolve into some degree of mental illness and self-hatred. I mean, I don't know the statistics on this because I don't read statistics because I don't believe in them. I think they're all made up. But I would argue if somebody out there could do a real study that liberals were far higher on the mental health. I mean, the people who were taking antidepressants or. people who are taking anti-anxiety meds, I'd argue the majority of them are liberals, or let liberals at least take them out a much higher percentage. Which is kind of interesting. If we were to accept, and I think liberals themselves might even accept this, if we were to accept that liberals take mind-altering drugs more often than conservatives for anxiety, depression, whatever it is, some kind of mental health ailment. Why were you trying to push the world with your worldview? But all of you are on the verge of suicide. Like, isn't that disqualifying? Isn't that disqualifying in itself? Your worldview, the majority of people who think like you can't even live within their own mind. And you're trying to make society do it. Like how does his end? You know, it's interesting what you said, because even a block is right twice a day, right? So like I agree with the liberals on Gaza, Palestine, Israel. I agree with the liberals. All the liberals are the Palestine flags I agree with. But then they have a Ukraine flag in their bio. And I don't agree with that. Like they always choose the oppressed team. So sometimes they get it right. And a lot of times they get it wrong. They always choose the oppressed team. But it's interesting because I rationally look at both situations and come to what I believe to be a rational conclusion. People can disagree with me. It's fine. But I don't believe I'm ideologically aligned. I literally just look and go, well, that's not right. And that is right. And that's makes sense. But they automatically choose the underdog, no matter what. That's it. And so for them, it is like a biological response to things. It is very interesting. You can say certain things. It's actually kind of annoying because especially when you talk on the internet, you have to be careful how you phrase things, because especially when you're not everything is translated and put in a court of law. But it's interesting. I've always been the person who looked at a tree, a big, beautiful tree. And my girlfriend would be like, wow, look how beautiful that tree is. And I'd sit there and go, that tree killed every tree around it. That tree annihilated every sapling anywhere near it. Its roots go so deep. A army tank, congression to that tree. And the tree will stay standing. That tree has annihilated. How many other trees has that tree murdered? And the women see, wow, a pretty tree. And I see that tree's a gangster, but he's dangerous. That tree's killed people. My mentality has always been that. Now when you say this, there's going to be some autists on the internet who's going to think, oh, take, said go out there and kill all my enemies. I'm not saying that. But please. But yeah, two degree to win. I guess you have to accept to win. There must be a loser. If you're going to be a winner, there are losers. And often, in many cases, in life, for one man to win, a hundred must lose. This is how it goes. So maybe this whole mentality of we don't want anyone to lose. We are more, we accept everything. We're not better than. Maybe you do have to have, not maybe, perhaps. You do have to have a degree of arrogance. You do have to believe you're worthy of winning, which means you have to believe you're better than the people you be. You have to believe it. Otherwise, you wouldn't beat them. And I guess the easy way to believe that is to believe that your culture is better, or your religion is better. But they throw all that away. They don't want to believe they're better than anyone anyway. They want this false idea of this equality. This fake-- everyone can just get along equality garbage, which anyone with a brain understands isn't true. We'll never work. Ever. Question is, do they really even believe it will work? Or do they just hate themselves so much? I think I literally think it's almost angst. You're just like, whoa, whoa, whoa. But is a lot of that just cowardice and escaping suffering? Yes, I think so. Is that what it is? I mean, is it just being born with a mindset where you hate suffering so much? And you always team with the underdog and everything's unfair. And nobody should have to suffer. I mean, if you have the mentality that you're born to suffer, I think you'll be pretty good at things. If you're born with the mentality that nobody should suffer, you're always going to be shit at things. I understand I was born to suffer. And truthfully, I mean, I'm very, very blessed with my life. A lot of people have said to me, you know, you're under stress and they're putting you in jail and Romania and you're going through all this court. Like how do you deal with it? How do you smile? This is nothing compared to the suffering I could. I mean, is it hard? Not really. I mean, I don't know. I was built to suffer. I wake up every day and go, what's on the menu? Let's go. I'm so used to it. I'm kind of excited by it. The only period in my life where I could say where everything was genuinely perfect was about a month before I was arrested. And I've never been so anxious. I felt so anxious. I was in Dubai. All those videos from Dubai with the Bugatti and the Big Manchin and all the girls and everything and me and Tristan were sitting around the pool. And I remember I said this on every podcast. I'm gonna say it again for the people at home in case our life's going good. If your life's going good panic, I'm telling you, if your life's going well, worry. Because I was sitting there by the pool with the Bugatti and the McLaren and like 20 girls that were beautiful and were sitting by there and we got the big pool that when this huge mansion Tristan goes, six years ago we were in Luton, we made it. And I was like, now we're fucked, something's coming. - Yeah. - It's what you mean, I was like, I'm 36. I could not have completed life at this level. I could not be the most famous man on the planet, hundreds of millions of dollars. Endless women want my children. Bugatti on the drive. Like nah, there's no way I can get away with this for the next 50 years. Something's coming. Months like, there you go. That's as I would go. So I feel comfortable with the suffering because I feel like I have a direction than an objective. When I have endless suffering, I'm like, okay, well I know what I need to do now. I mean, what's more frustrating? A video game where you can't beat the final boss or you know when you play those games and you get lost and you can't find the next part and you're just going around circle, I've been in this room and just going around and going around circles. Those are the games that pissed me off more than the game where I'm trying to beat the guy I can't beat. I'm happy fighting an enemy I might not be able to beat. I'm much more anxious when I'm lost. So I think when you accept that suffering is part of life you get good at suffering and then you get good at things. If you're going to go through the world trying to make the world suffer less and yourself not have suffering, well then you're going to suffer more than anything. I guess that's why they end up pulping pills, though. How successful you are in life is directly correlated to your stress tolerance. In fact, it's more correlated to your stress tolerance than anything else. Forget IQ, forget most nearly anything. If you're the guy you can deal with more stress than anyone else to end up in the position where you're dealing with more stress than anyone else and those positions one way or another pay you. Because no one else will do it. I think there's stats on that, but I think it will. Well, no, I'm telling you because NASA the only way you can even separate yourself from the labor market in general, right? I can put myself in a position to do what others won't do. Even me, why am I globally famous? I've said water's wet. I don't believe I've said anything truly remarkable but everyone already knows it. But I'm the one who's dumb enough to say it and go to jail for it. So that's why. So you have to put yourself in a position where decarating your home with guns, kicking your dog, threatening to shoot your dog in the head, threatening to shoot your dog in the head, you know, dragging your females around by their hair. And you gotta put yourself in a very stressful place. And that's the same with everything. It's the same with every fighting champion. They take the shock. I want the belt now on two days notice. I'll take it. That's how I won my first world title, two days notice. So why do they become champion? Because they were the guy ready to fight for a championship without a training camp. They're that guy. So a lot of it is down to stress tolerance. But it is really interesting how these things apply to the individual and how these things apply to the macro. And you know, I try and have conversations with, here we go, let me say something controversial. I try and have conversations with women, which is always a mistake. Because they don't understand anything outside of themselves. They only think about themselves. They're very selfish. And whenever I discuss any subject with men, we discuss it on the macro and we discuss it on the personally applicable, right? We can even look at a legal system. Remain is the safest country in Europe. Do you know why? Because they'll lock you up on nothing. They don't care. This whole individual rights, individual liveries, innocent, ill-proving guilty, that's Western garbage. That's why London's stab city. Because of that. The reason there's no stabbing here is because if they even suspect that you maybe might have once you go to jail, and it's your problem to get out, it's not a fair problem, it's your issue. They don't care. And lots of societies are like this. Japan's the same. Everyone talks about Japan and talks about how safe it is. Since I got jail, I did a lot of research on different legal systems around the world. Because I'm going through the remaining legal system. I thought, you know what? Is this this system is garbage? What other systems are there? Everyone goes, oh, Japan's so safe. Japan's so safe. Do you know why? Because they have a 98% conviction rate. That's why. Because if you stand in front of a judge, your toast, and there's nothing you could say to get out of it. If England did that, it would be safe too. But we don't. Individual rights, individual liveries, we've put the individual's feelings over the sanctity of the entire society, the B over the B hive. I'm not saying that's right or wrong. I mean, I'm currently in a situation where as a B, I wish things were different. But as a B hive, Romanians are like, oh, yeah, well, you know, you're rich. Romanians say this to me, you're very rich. You talk a lot, you drive a fast car. And it's good that the poor people here see that being rich comes with problems or it might make riots. And you know, it's your rich and you go to jail sometimes. They're just like, it's for the B hive. It's for the B hive, get over it. This is kind of how they think. And I say, I'm innocent. They go, yeah, yeah, yeah, innocent guilty. That has nothing to do with it. It's good for the B hive. - If the tax is joined, but it already says something. - Yeah, it's good for the B hive. So get over it. China's the same. So fuck the B. We're the other way around, right? So these things all apply. And it's very interesting when you discuss all these subjects and you can discuss something about the legal system and what's the right way to do it, how it applies to society and how it applies to the individual. I was talking about this with some girl. We were watching a TV show and a stalker killed his ex girlfriend. And she was like, why didn't they stop him? That's terrible. She kept calling the police. Why didn't they stop him? That's terrible. I'm saying explain to me. Come on, I'm gonna try and treat you look at her. Which is a mistake. Woman. Explain to me how they could have stopped this happening.
the police. But she called them. She called the police. Yes, she called the police and said that her ex won't leave her alone. Do they now have to life in prison? Her ex is that your solution? What's the solution here? He called her over and over and over again. Keep calling her. He made a threat. The police went around and saw him and said, stop threatening her. Don't contact her again. He contacted her again. They put him in jail for a month. He then got out and killed her. What could they have done different? Are you saying that any man who texts his ex should go to jail for life? Is that-- apply this to the macro. Forget about you being a woman, thinking seeing the woman dead on the TV. Apply this to a society and explain to me your plan. Thank you, fucking God one. And by extension, as it dissolves, it dissolves to culture with it. And culture is far more effective at policing than even a government can be. We talked about-- I just talked about the remaining legal systems around the world. But I would also argue that one of the main reasons Japan and Romania is safe is that the Romanian is going to steal. He'll steal outside of Romania because he doesn't want his family to be known as thieves in Romania. And I've heard them say that. If I steal, I go to England. Because then no one's going to call my mother the mother of a thief. So the culture polices them here. And the culture polices people in Japan, the culture. But you're right. If you remove all these other things and give everything to the state, well then the culture dissolves along with it. And it's actually culture that will police far more effectively than a police force ever could. I mean, you can spend endless money on police forces, like America has. I mean, their police forces have more money than armies. It doesn't stop the crime at all. It's only going to-- because the culture is a mess. The culture is everyone out for themselves and take drugs and rap music and garbage. Well, the culture's shit. Police say, "We're going to fix it. They never will." That's what's so transformative about Trump win. And that's what liberals actually fear and won't admit. They don't fear any policies going to pass. They say they do. They say they pretend to give a shit about some policy and tariffs. Now liberals are upset about tariffs. Since when is a liberal cry about tariff ever? You're literally the party of taxes. You're trying to give your money away. And now you're complaining about tariffs. They don't care about his policy. They care about the fact that he's going to change to culture masculine. That men have one. Not gendered men, actual men. Not the gay faggot. The real men have one, which means a culture will become more masculine, which means parameters will appear. People will start saying, no, you're not teaching my kid that. That's what they're afraid of. They're afraid of the culture changing. So they try to disintegrate culture and give everything to the daddy state because they like this idea of absolute fairness and clarity in all things to remove suffering. Let's make it all fair. What's so insane about that is that the state isn't fair with anything. That's what's so crazy about it, right? I completely understand why you cannot-- why people do not like the idea of the brothers of a woman going around and beating up the husband or her exor. I get why people might say, yeah, but what if they go too far, what if they kill him, who's going to decide what's fair, what if he only slaps her and they break his face, whatever. We need to give it up to a court to be fair. Well, maybe the court's better with certain things, but courts aren't fair. Courts are not fair unless you've been to court yourself. You have no idea how unfair courts are because courts have judges and judges aren't people. You know, I've gone to court here with a piece of paper. This is a bad person. And the judge said, jail. And then I've appealed it and walked in there to the next judge with the same piece of paper, two days later. And she's ready and goes, there's not enough evidence here to even hold this man on house arrest free. Same law, same piece of paper, same country, two judges. Talking about the problem of morality. Because we're talking about the liberals and conservatives. They literally see the world-- interesting, because then you have to analyze. Because I don't want to be the kind of person who complains without coming up with a solution. It's easy to complain that space travel is expensive. And then they say, OK, fix it. And you're like, why don't I? Well, then you say, what's the solution? So how do you fix-- how do you even build a fair judicial system I don't know? Right now, completely off the top of my head, based on what you just said, which made me think of something, which is quite interesting. I think it would be very good to have, let's say you had a panel of judges from all different socioeconomic backgrounds. Now, they'd all be biased. But at least you'd have a spectrum of bias. Because the problem is, when you have a judge who's been, like you said, to a university, which is liberal. And his friends are other liberal judges. And they were probably wealthy, raised in a liberal area. And their parents were liberal. I mean, do you even have a real G who wants to go be a judge? I mean, there's a lot of book reading. I mean, there's a lot of studying. We want to do other things. The mentality that makes you want to sit and read for 10 years is already counter to a lot of masculine imperies. I don't know. If you were to get a judge, and the judges knows the law, whatever, and you were to put him next to a builder. And just hear the case. See what the builder has to say about it. You know what a builder would say about my case? This is bullshit. This is the biggest bullshit. This girl lied. What's stupid? A judge will sit and go, oh, well, you know, maybe. It's really interesting. You're right. So liberalism is almost now coded into, as you just said, the power structures. Liberalism's coded into the power structures. And if you try and become powerful and you're not liberal, well, they'll crush you anyway, because you're outnumbered. That's how it works. I don't think you'd even get far. You often wonder why. I mean, Trump's pulled off a miracle. You look at me, England. I don't know about Ireland so much, but I'm sure it's pretty similar. England, England will never have a Trump. They'll just never-- I want them to. And I hope I'm wrong. But it's just like when anyone is even 5% of Trump, the way they're piled on, and the difference between Trump and everyone else's, Trump didn't bend. That's the difference. Everyone else who's kind of tried to be a Trump a bit bent. Like, I was a huge fan of Nigra Farage. I like Nigra Farage. I'm not insulting Nigra Farage. I support it in for you, Kip. I support it in. The second they say, educate, support it you. Instead of saying, lots of people support me. And I'm not responsible for the actions or the lifestyles of every single person who supports me. I'm here to do my job, and I'm glad that lots of prominent figures across the spectrum support me. That's a professional answer, which I just come up with off the top of my fucking head. So I'm more qualified than him. What does he say? All well, I just take this as a reward, things I know. And I don't want to talk about it. He shits himself. It's like, stop shitting your pants against these people. That's what they want. They thrive on your fear, like demons. That's why they hate me so much. Because I sit down with the BBC, and they're like, oh, so we figure a rapist. I'm like, fuck you. Fuck you. And then you're a misogynist. Sometimes it blows their mind. That's why they hate Trump. You can't say that. Says it again. He's a mad master of what you say. Repeat himself. Like that's the only way to beat these people. It's amazing how this like herd mentality has put so much fear, so much fear, especially inside of the Western male, that we're all afraid. Even the truth speakers, the freedom fighters, especially on Twitter, who say the things that you're not supposed to say, great. Stage one is to say it. I agree. I'm not against you. The fact you're all animals, all, just devalues it. They can't kick you all out of your jobs. They can't ban you all. You might get a movement if you put your fucking face to it. I know it's scary. This is exactly it. It's scary. It's dangerous. But that's why I'm in the situation I'm in, because I put my face to it. The thing I'm so interesting about morality is that you can rationalize it so easily. It's a moral to steal. But he was starving. OK, well, he was starving. So he stole. But then what point is starving? Is he going to die tomorrow? Is he going to die next month? Is he just hungry? Did he eat yesterday? Is he a little bit peckish? Like how do you now justify it? And we all do it. I did it myself. I did it myself. When I ran my webcam studio, I had my webcam business. And I had all these girls working for me. And everyone was happy. Everyone was making millions of millions of dollars. Everything was fine. Girls were making money. I was making money. Everything was fine. And then I'd sit there and go to Tristan and say, oh, we should move into another business to move away from all this stuff. Tristan's going to make a whole bunch of money. I'm like, yeah, but let's move away from it. And anyway, we went on holiday to Thailand for a week. And then we came back after a week in Thailand. And none of the girls have worked. We've been in Thailand. I have it a great time. And on the website, we saw all their customers. All their customers were just giving other girls money, just sending money. And I was like, Tristan, if we don't run our webcam business, these guys are going to spend their money anyway. It's like, let's say you have an alcohol store. There's two alcohol stores in a row, side by side. An alcoholic walks into your store to buy alcohol. If you don't sell it to him, he'll just buy it the next place. Are you going to go bankrupt? Is that moral so that you can't feed your family? So then you rationalize it. Go, well, he's going to buy it anyway. These guys are going to spend money on girls anyway. You can't stop them. If you tried, you couldn't stop them sending their money away. So why can't I take it? Maybe it's bad that every webcam business, but the girls are happy. I'm happy. They have lambo's. I have lambo's. The guys are going to give his money away anyway. Why not us take it? So then morality all becomes-- and then, once again, this was so interesting what we said earlier. On the micro, yes. The girl who worked for me was rich. I was rich. The man was happy because he wasn't going to give his money away anyway. And he got stuck to the girl he liked. All happy. But how does that apply to society? How does that apply on the macro? The decision, sometimes what's good for the B, isn't good for the B high. And this is basically the argument you can have with anything. The reason a factory wants loads of cheap migrant workers is so the owner of that factory can have a yacht. Perhaps why? Is that good for the society? And these things conflict. I don't have enormous rationalizations. And all enormous rationalizations. And they'll rationalize morality.
So the people who are looking at the town saying, "You're bringing in millions of illegals to this town. You're destroying the town." That's immoral. He'll say, "I'm saving millions of disadvantaged people from a poor country and giving them honest work. I'm the good guy. No, I'm the good guy." And all battles in life, that's the reason they're so complicated, is because the Western world and the Empire of lies actually tries very hard when it wants to, to add clarity and make this clear dividing line between the black and the white and the good and the bad. Poo in his bad. Everything he's ever done is bad. Everything about him is bad. Hitler is bad. You say, "Well, yeah, Hitler may have done some bad things, but he did build the auto bombs. He built roads." What's yours, you love Hitler? There's no subjectivity when they want it clear-cut. They want it bad. But the truth is, with nearly all things, this very shade's a gray, it's not black and white. And this is where the most fierce battles come from is when both sides are kind of right. And then we, as people, choose our team. So we'll choose the town, perhaps, and say, "We agree with the town. The Liberals will agree with the factory owner who's helping the migrants." And then everyone believes they are right. And people don't fight when they believe they're wrong. They all believe they're right. And the Nazis thought they were right. The Allies thought they were right. That's why it was so fierce. That's the human condition. How do you fix that? I don't know how you fix that. And there's not many places on earth where that can happen. Not many places on earth, because an election is a replication of or replacement for a war. That's the whole point of it, right? Who's the leader now? Let's find out. To avoid all the bloodshed, you have an election. And it is kind of amazing. But the whole Western society, you talk about Western values and I say how they're based on freedom, it's actually kind of amazing that Western society at large is based on that. It's based on this idea that people are prepared to take an L. And that's what gives law and order. I've always found that amazing. I live in a house with many different cultures, many different races, and we're racist to each other all day long, and it's funny. And I was, because it's funny. And half my families, why half my family's black, so these different worldviews. And whenever I'm talking about my black side of the family or my black mindset towards certain things. And I've always said I find it amazing, because I'm an extrace person, right? So I can tap into both sides. I could, I truly, I could go, I could, like I could change teams, right? It's just truly amazing. But I'm like, one of the things I find amazing about white people in general, or Western society in general, is that people can take L's like that. And I'll have a disagreement with my neighbor in Minnesota. We'll sue each other. We'll go to a judge who wasn't there. You weren't even there, sir. And we're going to tell you, we're both going to tell our story, and the judge who's never been there, and never even seen it will go, "Nah, happened 10 years ago, and I wasn't there, I think him." And the other guy will go, "Okay." The end. Now, isn't that remarkable? Like, if two neighbors have a disagreement and Zimbabwe, it's Meshese. So you're like, "Alright, let's fix it then." It's kind of amazing. And the whole Western world is built on this principle, and it's kind of incredible. And you're right. That's the one thing the Western world, for a long time, did well. We're going to see how it goes into the future. But that's what it did good. No, 100%. Because it's gone too far. It's gone way too far. And there's no light without dark, and there's a limit to all things, right? So one of the things I said on Twitter that super pissed white people off was when I said that white people are going to go extinct, and they go, "Fuck it, mad." They got super mad. And it's like, and they came up with all the cope about mass deportations. And supposedly they're going to kick me out. Yeah, good luck. Blah blah, all these dreams. And it's just like, it's kind of interesting, because the same thought process that allows you to sit there and listen to a judge and build these complicated rockets and work together, and consider other people's feelings, and have these huge organizations and these other teams. And the fact that you're not just selfish in and of yourself is great. But that's also the exact same thing that's going to contrast rate and constrain you. Like if white people truly care about white people, what should they do? And your societies are all collapsing, which they are. You need to have children. Now, if you say to a white person, have kids, they're going to come up with reasons why they haven't yet, or they will, or they're going to say, "My wife doesn't want anymore." Is your wife's feelings more important than your civilization? Find someone else. Now, that's the black in me. The black in me is like they can get another chick. And they're like, "You can't do that. You can't do that. It's immoral." So your moral is just to walk off a cliff and get replaced by the black people, because the black people don't give a shit. So that we have to, it's really interesting when you look at it that way. Once again, be high of B. But it's really interesting because you're going to allow people into your country who will have kids with anyone, irregardless, be less interested in their offspring financially at least. And also, now you've built this mentality where the average white woman wants burkin bags and an Instagram lifestyle. Do you say to a white chick, "Do you want a kid?" She goes, "Yeah, once we have a second house and three cars and a nanny." Well, no, everyone can provide that. It's actually one of the strengths of Islam. And I don't want to talk about religion on this podcast. One of the strengths of Islam is that you can work in a chicken and chip shop. And you have a wife who will have your children and obey you. But online. And that's why they're out-producing the white population so crazily. So it's very interesting how there's light and dark and all things. So the same thing that does amazing here. Now, the white man, I say to the white guys in his house, I make fun of them. And I'm like, "Bro, you need to have 10 kids." He goes, "Oh, yeah, my woman." She takes too long. Where you need five chicks. They can't get their head around it. Like, I can't do that. Why? Why? Is life an illegal? Is not even illegal? Save the race! But they can't do it. But we all know that fatherless children are problems. We all know that. And we all know that society is stable with man, woman, child, boom. I get all that. I'm not disagreeing with any of that. I'm saying you're going extinct. What are you going to talk about society? If you're not going to be around to see it. So it's like, at what point do you reduce the quality for quantity or become less moral to win? At what point do you do what it takes to just survive? I don't know. I'll tell you that if there was a nuclear war coming in a warhead was about to drop on the city you're in. And you needed a train fare to get out. And the only way you can get train fare is to mug an old lady. Are you a moral or you moral? Like the nuke is coming. Like, you're running out of time. So it's really interesting when you actually analyze these things. You apply them to be be high and how it all plays out in the end. But it's mass consensus. But it's very interesting because here's where you talk about the different sets of morals. Because to people who come into the western world believe they're as moral as you are. They just have different morals than you do. But their moral is now their morality is now allowed them to be more competitive in this said space. Now it's not going to be that way forever because they're going to degrade the society they're enjoying now. But for the short term they're going to gain more and more power based purely by population dynamics. That rocket thing you just said super interesting because it's completely coincidentally we had this exact conversation this house two weeks ago. I said white people built NASA white people had glasses and Texas accents and they built rockets. And I was making a front of the black guy saying you ain't ever built anything. And his reply was we let you build society because we just come to take it. It's ours now. And I'm like what do you have to say white guy I'm in the middle. Here we go. What's what's good for the be high what's good for the be so if you say to a woman the only way to save society is to stop going university and wasting your most two tell years reading an old textbook instead start having kids. She can say I don't want to do that. That's bad for me. The be. So yeah, but think of the hive. So now you come down to the arguments of and then once again it's the age old argument you can apply nearly anything. Be versus be high. Same thing with men go into war go into the army. I don't want to go get blown up but your country needs you. So it's like as we move towards individualism perhaps I don't know you know Roman history better than I do but as we move towards individualism the most crazy thing it talks to thing about this is. It's not just female individualism because the main the main ways to cite is always fixed this is didn't give women a choice. That's the truth most places in the world just said your woman you get pregnant get over now we've given them the choice but at the same time we've given them the choice and convinced them to not get. To poison them and whether that's purposeful. We've come along and I would argue that there's a lot of incentives by Hollywood and by the matrix to try and convince women to not have kids or it's just accidental by the envy of endless social media. Women now don't want to have children and they have the choice and I'm not saying they shouldn't have it I'm saying that's the situation we're in how can you fix it it's difficult. I mean we always go back to there's that idea that the 1950s was this utopia and I'm sure it wasn't but you know the average man had an average job he could afford an average house and an average car and a factory even it was on skilled labor and he had his wife and blah blah. We talk about the 1950s but the basic deal that promoted birth rates and provided children the basic deal back then was that you had a woman who took care of you and obeyed you and you went to work. And the reason why no one's really having kids especially in the western civilized world now is the deals completely broken because women don't want to listen to you and they don't want to obey you. They may even say they want marriage women say they want marriage all the time it's not a women don't want marriage maybe it's just me being a billionaire but trust me it's all they want. But I'm not stupid enough to fall for it maybe I'm a bachelor I'm not a kid with them you know I got my morals now I can I can sit here and justify it to you for the next 10 hours. Well I will not marry her because financial protection for me physical protection for her she she has enemies I have enemies sorry and she'll become a target for law enforcement and everyone else. XYZ I'll still give her a kid I'll still pay for the kid I'll still see the kid I'll still raise the kid but they'll live there I can come here and sit and justify it but more morally I'm sure a lot of people sit there and say it's wrong but I'll sit and say I'm going to die with 20 sons so I win. So all the morals are always all mixed up but the basic premise was you're a man you go to work you get a woman who obeys you and does as she's told and you get to get married. The deal was a man will give his freedom for woman who obeys now no one gets married because women don't want to obey men so why would you marry one. I don't know what's the point during the Roman day.
I'm not sure what they're up to, but then you have to look at once again, controversial subject, the different ideas of race and bachelorism, because a black bachelor has 20 kids. And a white bachelor has none. It's the same with everything. The people in the middle get fucked on every single point. Poor people didn't get the vaccine. Rich people didn't get the vaccine. People in the middle got the vaccine. It's the same. Poor people don't pay taxes. Rich people don't pay taxes. People in the middle pay the taxes. You know, it's so interesting and so amazing how it's to people in the middle get fucked. I guess the reason for that, the logical reason would be because if you're going to make a law, you want to make a law that applies to the most people, the largest percentage of the population. I'm guessing if you're going to make a law, obviously the law, I mean, laws can't be individualistic. Laws have to be, we talk about the little girl getting dragged out from the house because she's an illegal immigrant. The point of it is that's the law and you can't individually apply it because that's like me saying to the police, I'm allowed to speed. I'm a better driver and it's true. I am. I am allowed to speed. I decided. But according to the law, I'm not because the limit is 30 so everyone has to obey the law. That's the law. So I guess you're going to make a law you want to apply to as many people as possible, I guess. But the people at the top and the people at the bottom get away with a lot of things that the people in the middle get wrecked with. And you're right. I mean, it seems to me to say, haven't missed kids because I can afford endless kids. I can afford 100 families. And it seems to be able to be able to bomb because they don't give a shit. It's the people in the middle who have tried to do the right thing. It's weird. You know, sometimes you do the right thing and you get screwed over. Sometimes you do the right thing and you get fucked. I can't remember the exact. This is it. And this is what's scary now because being a law-biting citizen is going to end in your destruction. It's the reality, the death cult, the Princess. You're going to be broke. You're going to be sad. You're going to have no kids. You're going to be full of vaccine and you're going to want to kill yourself. It's amazing that you can't just wake up like you couldn't in the 1950s and say, I'm going to be a law-biting citizen that falls law and I won't have problems with the law. No. Get out. If you want to escape the matrix, I said to Tristan, we were in jail. We're sitting in the jail cells. I broke. There is no way. Forget webcam. Fuck webcam off. There is no way people like you and I from a Luton Council estate could get this rich without catching a case. There is no way. No matter what we did, I could have sold the cure for cancer. I would have got a case for something. You just can't get out without catching a case somewhere along the way. So you can't just say I'm a law-biting citizen. I don't have to fear the law. What I'm going to do is I'm told and I'll be fine because the laws are so restrictive that the reality you're going to live is going to be so dire that you may as well break the fucking law. There's no point even trying to live this existence. And it's amazing how these laws strangle whole. I found this out the other day and I'm not even sure it's true. I haven't fact checked it. But if it's true, I am amazed that laws strangle whole. We just talked about how new laws come in every day and they slowly incrementally take a freedom away. That's what they do. They do it little by little so you accept it. Ah, it's only 1%. It's like inflation. Of course, 50 years later you're fucked, right? I remember congestion in charge coming into London and I remember how big of a deal it was. When the congestion in charge came in, you had to pay 10 pounds a day to go into the central London and they said it was about traffic and fixing the environment. And at the time it was 10 pound and there was a big he-hob, eventually it went through and then eventually it went up to like 30 or 40 pounds a day who can even afford that on a normal wage. I don't know. So that went up. And they said, because it's for the environment, if you have an electric car or a hybrid, you don't have to pay it. I don't know if this is true. So if this is not true, please forgive me. But I've heard that you now have to pay it for electric cars. That they've made it, can you check this? That they've changed the law. So now even electric cars have to pay the congestion charge which is supposed to be protecting the environment. So they made the congestion charge, then they slowly put it up, then they remove the exceptions and slowly by slowly you get fucked. Imagine you were the guy who sold his car he loved and bought a bullshit Prius. Just to avoid congestion charge to get screwed anyway. And this is how the government's work. And there's no riots from the people, nobody complains. No one in the government is held accountable. Because there's no responsibility to accountability, there's some minister for transport that nobody really knows his name. You never see his face anywhere. But truthfully no one's gonna be like, who did this? Who's the charge of the German Bitcoin selling? Nobody. Who did it? Who knows? Oh well, we're all broke. And it's the people in the middle who are getting monumentally and endlessly fucked. Because the people in the bottom of the top have a different mentality and perhaps this ties in full circle to what you said in the very beginning about the mentalities to escape. The people in the middle of the top sit and say, I'd rather be a fugitive than live like that. It's like good fellows or a good fellows or a scar face, one of those movies where he says, I saw people, you were suckers. I couldn't live like you. I had to do something else. I couldn't be the common man. I saw you all as marks. You're all suckers. We have the end. Call five years play this. I'm telling you, it's the beginning of the end. Because we'll talk about registering in a minute. But in fact, let's talk about it now. You're in the middle. You want to be a law-abiding citizen. England just said you have to tell him how many chickens you have. I'm going to be so this law. They've just passed a law where all the farmers have to say how many something to do with bird flu. Just tell him all the chickens you have. But we all know what's going to come in the next 10 years. It's a limit on how many chickens you have. That's why you have to tell him how many chickens you have. The people who obey this law are going to get fucked. The people who end up making a whole bunch of money or going broke because they go to jail, either richer poor, are the people who don't obey the law, the law breakers because if you're law-abiding, you can't escape anymore. So the people with the mentality of, I'd rather catch a case than obey. Are the people either end up homeless or on a yacht? If you were to say to me right now, I was in jail four months in Romanian jail, which is the worst jail you can possibly do. Since I've got out, I spoke to my friends in England who have all been to jail and they're like, bro. Don't worry about English jail. You're going to fuck it. I described my jail and I heard his jail and I was like, bro, now I want to go to English jail. They're trying. So hopefully I can go experience it because it sounds great compared to what I went through. So I've done jail maximum, so I've experienced it. But my point is I said to Tristan, would you rather live like us with our finance and our global notoriety and our access to the most beautiful females on the planet and private jets and yachts and the best cars we can go anywhere and private security and sleeping safely at night with guys with guns outside of our house and endless children and go to jail for six months a year for your life, but have six months of freedom. Or would you rather live a normal life? And Tristan looked me dead in the eye and he goes, those people are more in jail than will ever be. And I'm like, I would rather go to jail every year for the rest of my life and be me then go back into that bracket because that bracket is just fucking dire. Goes back to what you said about making them docile. Making them sick, so they can't organize themselves. So they're not a formidable force against the power structures. And this is what we aren't. The West has fallen to the point now where all of the people in charge aren't even competent on any level. They're not nationalistic, but they're also not competent. Isn't the baseline for a leader a competent nationalist? Wouldn't you call those two maybe the basic? I'd like someone who believes in the country and can do things. Please. We don't have a single one in Western Europe. The rule, I hate to interrupt you. I hate to interrupt you, but this is so important, I think. The rules are so scary to rule followers. And it's kind of interesting when you talk about mentalities because my mentality has always been. And I'm sure that once again, this is going to go against me. I'm still going to say I don't care. My mentality has always been, break the rules. Not in a bad way. Just in a, hmm, there must be a way around this. I can give you a million examples. I remember getting caught by a speed camera. I was 21 years old and I had a GSXR 600 and I was driving too fast. I got caught by a speed camera and I had to go to court. I had a three point fine and I went to court and I think I said it wasn't me on the bike or something. I lied. Poo me a joke. I lied. And I ended up walking away with six points. And I remember saying to the judge, I remember saying it, why did I try and do the right thing and even come to court? I tried to do the right thing and come to court and I got more of a punishment. This is bullshit. Anyway, from there, I then thought I'm going to buy my next motorcycle in France. So I have a French plate so I can speed through speed cameras. That's just how my mind works. When I look at this, ooh, that's shit. If I lift a London, I'd go cool. I'll go buy a car in France. All the wheels on the wrong side do get to shit. I think outside of the rules. This is how my mind works. Give me another number plate then. Send the tickets to France. Good luck. That's how my mind works. Most people's minds don't work that way. All the rules will maybe the French police will arrest me. Yeah, they're going to send an interpol over a fucking U-less fine dickhead. There's such poosies that that's why they end up stuck in the middle permanently. Now that is the matrix, but we need that. If everyone thought like me, it would be chaos. I know this. So it's actually super important to super interesting how scary the rules are to the rule followers. And this is what's amazing. That Elon Musk has the same mentality as a bank robber. It's the mentality is the same. It's the capability may be different. Obviously, there's going to be tweaks to the mentality, but you need to be as a man smart enough to pick your battles. Like I'm going to court on time. You got to know when to break the rules, when to follow the rules. Everyone has that balance right because Elon knows, okay, we're going to build the rockets. I need, I have to follow the rules for now, but if I take over the government, you know, like, but he's mentality is rule breaker. If you're too far with it, which is what I said earlier, you have to be careful what you say on podcasts, but if you're too far with it, then you just become a straight criminal. You just rob people. Give me that now. If you're too far with it. So it's really fun in that balance that's interesting. I'm talking about Elon. I really think that this Elon Trump thing, you know, divine.
to say something is divine, I think, is overly used. But the way Trump moved his head from that bullet, pro. And then Elon pairs up with him. And most people don't understand that Elon is literally the only person on the planet that could have bought Twitter. Not because he's the richest. There's a lot of people with money and a lot of conglomerates with money. Because the government needs him. He's the only one they can't kill. They need him for EV, which China's taking over. If Musk dies, China runs EV for the rest of human history. They need him for space. NASA needs him. They need him for communications. They need Starlink. They need him alive. If any other billionaire tried to do what Musk did, he would have been law-faired or assassinated into the end. They tried to law-fair him a bit. But they can't go to that point of making up some girl from the history and locking them in a room like they do with that one else. They can't assange him or try and do what they do with Trump. Some girl did it, bankrupt him, gene-carol, some psychobitch. So Elon is in a really unique position because the government needs him. So he's managed to pull this off. And now he's in government to reform everything, which is really truthfully, unlike any other political change in history. This is a real rebirth. I also like to think a lot of these Neocons and a lot of the Matrix and a lot of the boomers etc are dying. So it's good. They're dying. They're old. These people. They're 70, 8, 60. You know, they've been around a long time. They're Russia fobes. They're just stealing from the stock market. They all own Lockheed Martin. Blah blah blah. They are dying. And we have this new generation of people coming in. So it's going to be very interesting how society changes paired with AI. AI scares the shit out of me. And one of the reasons AI scares me is because it's going to remove my competitive edge. Because I believe my competitive edge is how well I think and how fast I think and how fast I talk. And I'm going to lose all that when I'm when I was in a rural Lincoln. So it pissed me off. Because I want my competitive edge. So I'm going to lose it. So that shit scares me. But I guess to the average man, maybe that shit's appealing. I don't know. So society is going to change in a very interesting direction and how we're going to come up with morality and apply laws and all these things in the future is going to be super super super. I think we're living and I'm sure lots of people felt this way where I'm sure in nearly every generation they felt that the world was ending and that they were living in a very interesting time. But I like to feel like we are living in a very interesting time. It is super interesting. And tying back to what we said about suffering, you have to be prepared to go along for the ride. I think the best mentality to have with this world we're living in and how fast things are changing and how many hypocritical standards are set and how many things don't really make sense and how much insanity there is is just to be prepared to surf the wave and enjoy it for the surfing. Don't try and stop the waves. Just enjoy it for what it is. Liberals maybe trying to stop the waves in one direction and conserve it. It's just trying to stop it in the other direction. I'm not an accelerationist and I'm not an anarchist but I am very good at riding the wave. I am very much like white people. You're about to go extinct. Black people, you can't build rockets. I'm just like it is what it is. I'm on the surf board and I'm enjoying it for what it is because it is truly incredible and crazy and how it all ends up. I don't know. I just hope we live long enough to see some kind of final result from it because it's going to be very very interesting. And when you talk about B-High B you can also play all these ideas because we talk about AI and all these different things. They also apply so differently to different hemispheres, different countries, different places. You know what you watch those sci-fi movies and you have like these utopian cities and then outside of it are like the barbarians who can't or not allowed in the utopian city. And it's kind of like that now with the western hemisphere of the east. But imagine when AI comes in. Imagine once every single person in America has a knurling installed at birth and it's all AI systems controlling everything and there's no crime. And then you have the African continent has 17 times to population and no one has a knurling. And it just imagines like how the world will be and how can these people even compete globally? How can they even compete economically? How can they even generate money? How can they even generate goods or services or anything? It's going to be super interesting how these things apply. I mean I guess there are some lines already semi-drawn but once you add AI into everything that accelerates to infinity. Well I fired 20 of my staff and I replaced them with AI and the most thing the thing that's worrying about it is I warned them all a thousand times to think that's worrying about being a human that every single one of you at home should understand is that you're annoying because you're a human. It's part of being human. So even if you're a boss and I'll talk from the authoritarian perspective because in this scenario I was even though I had the best intentions I said look guys I can replace all of you with AI today but I won't because I like you. All I'm asking is that you try and then a month later he's late and then a couple weeks later he's late, a couple weeks later he doesn't reply. Over time when I have this option which is free and you cost money and you're a human you're going to get replaced. It doesn't matter how much your boss likes you, doesn't matter how much he loves you because even if you never make a mistake he now can't compete against a more ruthless people who will simply fire all their staff. So you're very it's very interesting also you talk about the Western world you're right and also what's interesting we talked about the boomers dying and the power. Power is getting into the hands of people who are younger and younger because my look at crypto they're like 16 year olds betting on meme coins. It's insane that when I was 16 I didn't have a five pound note. I was rich. Different. It's when you were a kid back in our day and we're not even that old. You couldn't possibly be rich at 17. You couldn't have made your own money at 17. There's no social media. There was no crypto. You could not have had a YouTube channel. You couldn't be a streamer. You couldn't run a company. No one took you seriously. There was no possible way. Now we have children. Children becoming millionaires. Even me when I need to do some of our most advanced AI stuff I go inside of a room and we have inside the real world we have another room with the advanced AI stuff. A lot of these people are like 18 16. I'm like I'm talking to kids. The children are doing this stuff. It's really incredible. Like a child army. I'm like Kony with this child army build these robots. It really is going to be a very very interesting future and I guess the best thing you can do is just be aware of it. You don't have to believe in evolution. Some people do some people don't but Darwin said the most adaptable survives. So you have to be aware of these things and at least paying attention to them and perspacacious because a lot of people don't even think about these things. It's amazing. A lot of people don't even think about these things. It's not good for them because it's not good for them and this is actually one of the things where we can talk about morality because okay morally I'm making a bunch of children rich. If you join the real world at any age you can be older or young but we do teach people how to make money online and we're the only school. It's actually kind of amazing to me as fast as the world moves. We are the only school that updates twice a day. There's no other educational place you can go and pay money where they update their curriculum twice a day. If you go to a university or you're learning things 20 years old. Like we're the only school that updates twice a day. If you log in tomorrow it's different than it was today. So we update twice a day and we're teaching all these people to make money and I am teaching all these people of all ages to make money. We have older guys and we have younger guys and some of these young guys make money and then they message me and they're like oh so what should I do now? And I kind of like yeah you're 19 you have three million liquid you're 19. They're like what do you do? I don't know what do you do? It destroys you because I'm like oh I can tell you what not to do. Don't fall in love with that girl who wants to handbags because you're going to lose all your money. Don't like don't go poppin bottles and clubs and try to show off how rich you are. I can give you a list of all the things you shouldn't do that you would have learned from experience of life if you'd lived but you haven't lived. You just made money as a kid and now you're all rich. It is really crazy. It's a scary crazy world because money amplifies. That's what money does and I could talk from personal experience. Money does not change who you are and amplifies who you are. It makes the bad people bad. It makes the good people good. It makes the smart people smart. It makes the idiots idiots. And it makes the children children and that's the problem. You know. You understand why they do it. You know someone I was super anti-sterwards and someone convinced me for steroids and I still don't take steroids but someone convinced me for us so easily. It was kind of scary so I know where. Yeah so I'm super anti-sterwards and the reason I'm anti-sterwards is because I'm annoyed because I have a very good physique and if steroids didn't exist I'd be even more exceptional so it really pisses me off but I'm lucky because I had my blood test done and my free test I think it's said I don't know the Romanian systems is between one and 19 of level of test and mine's at 22 so I'm above the maximum level completely naturally maybe it's just down the stress I'm under maybe it's jail. Who knows what it is but my body produces loads of it so I'm fine. So I've never taken any steroids I'll pass any test you give me blah blah blah and then I sent to the sky I don't need steroids I just train really hard I've never used steroids today he goes Andrew you're big because of course you don't need steroids look at you if you were like me before I took steroids you'd take steroids and I was like yeah I was like so I was like you don't think you could have ever trained your way out but he goes I did five years I trained my ass off I ate everything right I couldn't get my test level up I couldn't you showed me a picture of him before his own steroids so I get it he convinced me I was like yeah yeah I was like well some people just need it I was like fine okay I don't need it so I'm elitist I'm like fuck steroids will duh no one in my position takes it you know so it is interesting is right it's gonna be really interesting when the Chinese make their version of the Bionic Man yes and we make our version of the Bionic Man and we have the collectivism against the individualism because as an individualist and I am because I'm a rule breaker so I'm an individualist because I don't I'm not even collective enough to stay inside of the middle class I'm not supposed to stay where I'm supposed to do it a free society so I'm absolutely individualistic but when I look at collectivism I find it intimidating like when I see all the Chinese people doing the drums in tandem I get scared I'm like they all know kung fu and they that scares me I'm not scared of an individualist you can put some big scary MMA fight in front of me because I believe I don't care I'm a man I got
one swing, one shot, I'm a man with a chance. What I see collectivism intimidates me. It's gonna be really interesting how the AI, how we try and pair AI with individualism if we try that at all, or we try and alter our society completely so that we do move into a collectivist mindset so we can compete against the East. 'Cause they're gonna stay collectivist. Perhaps this is also a very interesting thing alasding to tie in. Perhaps as we lose our manufacturing base, and we lose our societies to crime and fentanyl, and we lose our ourselves in the West. Perhaps one of the reasons they are trying to make everybody so docile is that they've looked at their competitors which is the East and their collectivism and said individualism was fantastic for us to be entrepreneurs, and individualism was fantastic for us to do all these amazing things once. But now we don't really need entrepreneurs 'cause the AI is gonna be the entrepreneur. And the machines are gonna do all the thinking. So now what we need are drones. So perhaps collectivism is gonna be individualism because individualism has no merit against the AI machine anyway. So what do you need all the problems of individualism of get-rich or die-tryin, fuck the rules, I'll get a French number play, but you don't need any of that. We're all just a problem now. People like me at least do things and get rich and build rockets, whatever. Once the AI does the thinking, why do you need individualism at all? You don't, then you won't collectivism. So perhaps this, we're in an interesting situation where are they gonna try and move Western society towards collectivism, which it seems they're trying to do? Are they gonna try and pair AI with individualism and how's that all gonna work in the Western hemisphere when it goes to war or head to head in the big cyborg war of 2098 against the Chinese collectivist army? It's gonna be interesting. We're gonna see, but the final thing is that it's kind of interesting to me and I have no stats or day on this at all. But I feel like when I look, it feels like Elon himself as an individual is the only person who is competing against China's eventually hegemony over the planet. And I talk about EV vehicles about this because he has Tesla. Once you take Tesla away, every single EV is made in China. All of them. All of them. Like 98% of the world's EVs are made in China. Have you ever seen those videos of Chinese cars and how we don't buy them over here because they're huge tariffs and they're sanctioned? But you've seen for like 25-- - Day of tariffs. - Well that's right. For $25,000, a Chinese car is a million times better than a $300,000 car in the West. And it does everything perfect. And it can drive in underwater. And like all this crazy. Look up Chinese cars. You will not believe how advanced their shit is. But the West doesn't let them come here because VW, BMW, Mercedes, we out of business like that. So we don't let them in. But they're out competing us. And it's like when it comes to space, when it comes to EVs, when it comes to so many important things, AI. Only Elon is like Elon versus China. And the scary thing is we don't even really know what the Chinese have because they hide it all. But you can see in their vehicles. And I'll tell you a very quick story. Probably shouldn't say this, but I'm going to say it. I have a Remac Naveira, which is the fastest car in the world. It's an electric car made by Remac. And they're a great company. And I know them well. They now own Bugatti. And I know the owners and Remac are on make-up. And I'm super excited to drive my Naveira. It's a $4 million car. There is a car out of China. I think it's called a BVY something. It is faster than the Remac Naveira. And it costs 300 grand. My Naveira is $4.2 million. It's, bro, I'm telling you. So it's like Elon himself versus China. And here's where you talk about it. Bro, I'm telling you. And here's where you talk about, I guess it's the perfect place to end, the death call of the West. Because in any serious country, in any serious society, you'd sit and say, we have one man who is the richest man in the world who is competing directly with our number one competitor on the planet. Let's put him in government. Sensible, no? But liberals can't stand him. And they don't want him in government. They want him in jail so that we can just implode and die. So liberals, that's how unserious America is. We don't need it long. We need a tranny.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Fame and success do not inherently increase personal contentment; one's baseline happiness remains constant despite external changes.
Societal systems, particularly in the West, are criticized as being built on lies (e.g., freedom, democracy, opportunity), leading to public disillusionment and anger.
True societal unity often stems from a common external threat, which the West lacks, instead promoting an illusion of freedom through permissiveness in non-essential matters.
There is a deliberate erosion of traditional masculinity and individual capability to create a more docile, manageable population.
Those in power, whether criminals or elites, often share similar self-serving mentalities, differing primarily in capability and social acceptance.
Summary:
The speaker reflects that global fame and financial success have not altered his fundamental level of personal contentment, comparing life's challenges to aerodynamic resistance. He argues that Western society is built on a foundational lie—promising freedom, democracy, and the "American Dream" while delivering a highly controlled system that breeds public cynicism. Unlike other nations unified by external threats, the West lacks a common enemy, so it uses the illusion of freedom, often manifested through social permissiveness in "degenerate" but inconsequential areas, to maintain cohesion.
He criticizes a deliberate cultural shift to suppress masculine traits and individual potency to foster a docile populace. Ultimately, he contends that the powerful, whether street criminals or Wall Street bankers, often operate with similar self-serving psychopathy, with the key difference being their capability and the system's sanctioning of their actions. This realization leads many to feel exploited and angry upon discovering they've been deceived about their potential for wealth and true autonomy.
FAQs
No, the speaker suggests that contentment remains constant regardless of fame or success, comparing it to a baseline level of happiness that doesn't change with external circumstances.
The speaker believes that true masculinity includes the capability to be dangerous, and criticizes modern efforts to make men appear passive and non-threatening as intentional societal manipulation.
The speaker argues that both groups share similar predatory mentalities, differing only in capability and scale, suggesting that powerful figures often engage in harmful actions without moral concern.
The speaker claims Western freedom is an illusion, where superficial liberties like degeneracy are promoted to mask deeper systemic control and exploitation, leading to public disillusionment.
The speaker argues that without a common external enemy, Western societies rely on the false promise of freedom and wealth to unify people, which fails as these promises prove empty.
The speaker criticizes Western governments for lacking accountability, citing examples like financial mismanagement without public outcry, and attributes this to a docile, compliant population.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.
PodcastTranscript AI