“An Incredible Record” — Physical Therapists in the Military
23m 8s
In a PTJ Author Interview, Dr. David Greathouse shares insights on his essay about the evolution of "U.S. Military Physical Therapy, 1970 to 2020." The essay is part of a series in PTJ exploring the profession's history. Dr. Greathouse recounts his career path from joining the Army for two years to staying for 26 years, highlighting experiences at Fort Riley and the development of direct access programs. He discusses the positive impact of direct access on patient care and outcomes, emphasizing the efficiency and effectiveness of the military model. Dr. Greathouse also reflects on the support received from physicians, safety records, and the relevance of military PT practices to civilian settings. He recommends a military career for PTs due to educational opportunities, emphasis on readiness, and the unique experiences offered. The conversation touches on the pioneering role of Colonel Emma Vogel in shaping military physical therapy. Dr. Greathouse's dedication to teaching and advocacy for military physical therapy shines through, encouraging interested individuals to explore this specialized area of practice.
Transcription
3406 Words, 19888 Characters
(upbeat music)
- Welcome to PTJ Author Interviews.
PTJ Editor-in-Chief, Alan Jetty,
talks with authors about the most interesting
and sometimes surprising aspects of their work.
And now, Dr. Jetty.
- Well, I'd like to welcome listeners
to this latest PTJ podcast.
I'm very pleased to have as my guest today,
Dr. David Greathouse,
who is a colonel in the U.S. Army, retired,
but also currently works
with Clinical Electrophysiology Services
in Texas Physical Therapy Specialist in Texas.
Welcome, Dr. Greathouse.
- Thank you, good morning.
And thank you, Dr. Jetty, for this opportunity.
- Well, I'm very pleased that we can talk about your essay,
which was entitled,
"U.S. Military Physical Therapy, 1970 to 2020."
And our listeners should realize
that Dr. Greathouse's essay is one
of a centennial series that we're publishing in PTJ
on various aspects of the history of our profession.
So why don't we launch right into it
and let me ask you to talk a little bit about
your background and your career as a PT in the military
and what kind of led you in that direction for your career?
- Yes, thank you.
I graduated from Marshall University
in Huntington, West Virginia in 1968
and went to physical therapy school
at D.T. Watson School of Physiatrics
in Leedsdale, Pennsylvania, outside of Pittsburgh.
And it is now the University of Pittsburgh DPT program,
but at the time D.T. Watson was one
of the first physical therapy schools in the United States.
When I was in physical therapy school
for the year and 15 months,
Army, Navy and Air Force recruiters came to our campus.
The Vietnam War was going on at that time,
but the recruiters came and made a presentation
to show what military physical therapists were doing,
not only in Vietnam, but in their stateside hospitals.
And it intrigued me to what they were doing.
I really had no plan of where I was gonna go
after finishing PT school.
So my wife and I decided this would be a good opportunity
to try the Army for two years and get some experience
and then look for other avenues of work and practice.
As it turned out, I came in for two years and stayed 26 years.
So it was a very rewarding career for me,
both professionally, academically, clinically.
I started off, you go to some military schooling
and I'll mention that along the way.
I went to officer basic school for medical personnel
and then went to Walter Reed in Washington, DC
for two years from 1970 to 1972.
And during that time, I was on the wards,
treating patients not only back from Vietnam,
but other patients from the military.
And then I was in charge of the amputee program
for one year from '71 to '72 when I was at Walter Reed.
After 1972, I made the decision to stay in
for another assignment.
We moved to Fort Riley in 1972.
We were there through 1975.
The Army provided me opportunities in manual therapy,
training in EMG and nerve conduction studies
and Fort Riley was one of the test sites
for the first direct access programs for physical therapists
to see patients with neuromuscular skeletal problems
without referrals from physicians.
And to summarize my career,
I had two educational opportunities,
University of Kentucky, my master's degree
and my PhD in anatomy and cell biology.
After finishing my PhD, I went to the Army School
at Fort Sam Houston was the director for five years.
In 1990, I became the assistant chief
of the Army Medical Specialist Corps
and director and chief of physical therapy section.
And then in 1993, I became the chief
of the Army Medical Specialist Corps through 1996.
Both of those positions were with the office
of the Army Surgeon General.
And I believe that PTJ is going to have an essay
on Colonel Vogel, Colonel Emma Vogel was our first chief
of the Army Medical Specialist Corps in 1947.
- It's a remarkable career
that you described, Dr. Greathouse.
I had no idea of the breath and the complexity.
I'd like to take you back now to Fort Riley.
You were there when the military began direct access
for physical therapy.
Can you talk a little bit about how that came about
and how widely is it currently being practiced
throughout the military?
- Thank you.
Yes, in the early 1970s,
we were starting to bring the Vietnam War to a close.
So we still had some activity in Vietnam.
But there were a large number of patients
with musculoskeletal problems,
not necessarily from Vietnam,
but from training and exercises
and from physical fitness and so forth.
At the same time, we were losing a number of physicians
because the drafting of physicians
was then coming to a close.
And so with this large number of problems,
physical therapy saw an opportunity
to start seeing these patients
without the patients have to go to a physician
or at the beginning of PA or a nurse practitioner
at that time.
So it was mostly a large number of patients,
a small number of practitioners who could do that.
And so we brought up four test sites.
One was at Fort Riley, one was at Fort Sill in Oklahoma,
one was Fort Hood in Texas,
and the other one was Fort Knox in Kentucky.
And so we had a number of physical therapists
that were trained.
We had no training and background in this for PT school.
So we had, because we had the opportunity
to order imaging, radiographs to start
and then CAT scans and MRIs at a later date,
we had opportunity to provide some medicines
and pharmaceuticals and order lab studies.
We also, and I think one of the big things
that we were provided was the ability
to directly refer patients to specialty clinics,
to have them evaluated if we found things.
We spent a considerable amount of time
on differential diagnosis.
We met with the lab folks, the pharmacy folks,
the radiology folks and had training in these areas
we did not, which now that you see these are common
in physical therapy programs across the United States.
So we started with these test sites.
We soon saw that this was going to be a program
that was going to be very effective, very efficient.
And then it spread across other clinics
in the United States, first in the Army,
then the Navy picked it up, the Air Force.
And then there were some clinics in the public health
that later picked up direct access.
And now it is just a primary part of practice.
Physical therapists in the military
see patients in direct access environment.
They also see patients with referrals
from nurse practitioners, PAs and physicians.
- David, was there much pushback from physicians
in the military at the start?
- Very interesting question.
No, we got tremendous support from the physicians,
especially orthopedics because in most hospitals
we had orthopedic surgeons there.
And they were very supportive of our program
because they were then spending more time in their clinics
and especially in the surgery.
And so they were very supportive throughout.
And as we gained momentum with this program
as it moved in the '80s and the '90s,
we've continued to support the physician community.
- Let's talk a little bit about the safety record.
What does that look like for PTs in the military
functioning in primary care and direct access?
- The military physical therapists,
as you look through this program starting in the '70s
up through just current times
because we've just done a study on this just recently,
there have been no records of malpractice
or any legal issues within the military
on physical therapies,
practicing in a direct access or primary care environment.
We've had no problem.
That's not to say that there haven't been some issues
with maybe a misdiagnosis or something of that nature.
We've never had any legal issues
or any serious confrontation from physician groups
within the military to our practice
of primary care physical therapy and direct access.
- You know, that's an incredible record.
And it's one that I don't think is widely understood
outside of the military.
- I think that some of this has to do with the fact
that early on we prided ourselves
on seeking out additional education and opportunities.
And then we also had a very strict continuity quality
improvement CQI programs
at every place we were doing direct access.
So we had peer review and at the early start
we had physician review of our records and assessments.
As our program progressed and matured,
we moved from not having physician oversight.
And we still had liaisons with the physicians
but we just did peer review
and that continues on to our program at present.
- Let's talk about the other side of the coin
with respect to the positive impact
of direct access and primary care by PTs.
Is there good evidence with respect to its impact
on diagnostic testing, medication use and patient outcomes?
- Yes, when you look at how the military model
of direct access works,
if you look at a typical model,
the patient would go to their primary care physician
or PA or nurse practitioner.
They may be sent to a specialist
or they may then be sent to physical therapy.
The military model patient comes in
with some kind of a musculoskeletal problem.
They're seen by at their troop unit
and then sent directly to physical therapists.
At first our physical therapists were located
in our clinics within the hospitals
but now our physical therapists are located out
in the troop units or the troop medical clinics.
And so they have a very short,
most patients are seen within one day.
And so you take that opportunity for patients
to be seen very quickly
and having the military P's with physical therapists
with the ability to order imaging studies
and lab studies and so forth
to help make their diagnosis
and then plan their interventions.
It's very efficient and it's very expedient.
So the patient can be seen somewhere between 24 hours
to 48 hours of the incident of injury.
And we can see from our evidence
in just clinical practice,
the sooner a PT can look at a problem
with musculoskeletal pathology,
then the better the outcome's going to be
because the interventions can be provided
in an earlier day.
And I think that having the ability to order imaging
and lab studies and in some cases pharmaceuticals,
a couple of the other things
that PTs can do in the military environment
is they can place people on quarters.
They can also place and adjust their work schedules,
what we call profiles in the military
where they can adjust their work environments
so they can only lift certain things
or not have to run for certain distances
so that they can get better treatment
for their musculoskeletal problems.
- Well, you know, you were on the front lines
and lived through this experience.
What are some of the lessons that you would take
from your experience in the military
that might be relevant to civilian practice
of physical therapy?
Because although it's now legal in most states,
if not all, to practice with direct access,
it's not the predominant form of practice by any means.
What do you see as some lessons
from your experience in the military?
- One lesson that we have learned
that has taken place and I mentioned this already
is how what we have done with primary care
and direct access and education.
If you look at now the DPT programs
that are credited by CAPTI,
everyone now has courses in pharmacology.
They have courses in differential diagnosis.
They have courses in radiography and imaging.
And we now see that happening.
I think that, so the training is placed
in civilian PT schools.
The opportunity for civilian physical therapy students,
what they lack is the opportunity
to go to clinical practices that offer direct access
or primary care for PT.
We see a few more of these occurring in the United States,
but the opportunity isn't there for they get to clinical.
Whereas the students that go
to the military physical therapy school
at the Army Baylor doctoral program
in physical therapy at Ford Sam,
which is Army, Navy and Air Force,
therapists get that kind of opportunity,
clinical opportunity,
as well as Army, Navy and Air Force PTs
that come in from either ROTC or direct access
or direct commission.
They have the opportunity to train and learn
in clinical environments for direct access.
I think if you look at the failure and some organizations
like the VA has moved into some of these areas,
some of the licensing boards have allowed direct access.
And like you said, in most of the States,
the problem is they're not compensation
or reimbursement for these services.
And until Medicare or Medicaid starts funding,
physical therapist doing this in a civilian environment,
I doubt it's doubtful the third party payers
will jump on board with this.
The military model has been proven to be effective.
It's just, it takes legislative efforts
or efforts by the government insurance agencies
to fund and reimburse physical therapists
outside the military for their services in direct access.
- Yeah, I don't think that experiences
as widely appreciated as it should be.
Do many civilian PT programs place the students
in military PT practices?
- Yes, they have the opportunity.
The military clinics and hospitals primary responsibility
is to support the Army Baylor doctoral program at Fort Sam.
But then they do have other limited opportunities.
And so I can't give you the number of PT programs
that use military facilities,
but they have the opportunity,
depending on how much clinical education
these clinics and hospitals can provide
is a case by case basis.
But their primary responsibility is to the Army Baylor
doctoral program.
- Yeah, and that's...
- Those students that get that opportunity
will, as a part of their rotation or part of their clinical,
will have an opportunity to go to a direct access clinic.
- Yeah, and I think that would be really
very valuable experience for new PTs and PT students.
Well, as you think back on your career,
would you recommend a military career
for PTs and PT students?
- Yes, I would.
I think it's a kind of practice
that when you look at what we're seeing,
we're mostly seeing if you could think of an orthopedic
or sports environment.
Yes, we're seeing all kinds of patients,
but the military physical therapist is focused on
keeping the soldier, the airman, the Marine,
the naval person fit and ready for duty.
And so someone coming into the military,
you're doing two things.
You're going to be a physical therapist,
of which you can train through with your program,
but you're also going to be a military officer.
You're gonna be an Army Navy Air Force officer.
And so you're not only have the responsibilities
of being a physical therapist,
but also a military officer.
I think another thing that you have to think about
when you want to go into the military
is there is always a chance
because our primary mission is to support
the military fighters.
And that means when we deploy,
when troops deploy to like recently Iraq in Afghanistan,
we had physical therapists in theater,
both at the troop units and at clinics and hospitals
within the theater of operations.
And so you have to think about
if you want a military career,
even though now deployments are down
because of our withdrawal in those countries,
we still have the opportunity to be deployed in environment.
I think if you look at the height
of the Iraq and Afghanistan deployments,
we had almost every physical therapist
that was on active duty in the Army
had a rotation to one of those countries,
either with a troop unit,
whether they supported or to a hospital or a clinic.
So it's a kind of practice
that you have an opportunity to practice direct access,
which is unique.
I think the other opportunity for the military
is that those that stay in
after their initial assignments have opportunities,
we have excellent programs for education.
We send at least one military Army physical therapist
speak for the Army.
We send at least one Army physical therapist a year
to a PhD program.
We have two of the most outstanding fellowship programs
in clinical science,
one in sports medicine at West Point in New York
and one in orthopedic manual therapy
at Fort Sam Houston at BAMC,
of which we take three to four residents
every year and a half for their fellowship programs,
which also get a doctor's science degree
in our affiliation with Baylor University.
So there's educational opportunities.
So I think that, and then continuing education,
not only with outside and civilian,
but the Army has a number of physical therapy
educational opportunities like the CURSI course,
which is an advanced a musco-skeletal clinic course
for younger officers that have been in for a couple of years
and doing direct access to come and train in that environment.
You know, your essay focused on
the period of the 1970s to the present time,
the early 2000s at least,
but you mentioned Colonel Emma Vogel
in the early days of the military.
Could you just talk briefly about her role
and the early period of PT in the military
and how that developed?
- Yes, thank you.
I mentioned Colonel Vogel earlier in this discussion.
Colonel Vogel, if you look back,
military physical therapy would not be where it is today
without her efforts.
And she started out as you'll see in the essay
as a reconstruction aid during the later stages
of World War I and trained at Reed College,
continued the push at military physical therapy
and was at Walter Reed for a long period of time.
So not only did she contribute as a clinician
and as an educator during World War I,
but was very instrumental in keeping physical therapists
work at that time, civilians working in the military
in pre-World War II and then mobilized the forces
of physical therapists and training programs
in the United States to support our troops,
both in the European theater and Asia.
Then following the war, she was instrumental
in having the legislation passed
that brought Army and Navy and then Air Force,
not only physical therapists, but dietitians
and occupational therapists into the military
as commissioned officers,
of which they were during World War II.
But then they were formed within the corps,
within the Navy and the Air Force and then the Army.
They formed the Women's Army Medical Specialist Corps,
which was then changed to the Army Medical Specialist Corps
in 1955 when they allowed men, officers to be PTs,
OTs and dietitians.
And then the fourth specialty area within the AMSC
came in 1992 when we had the PAs
joined the Army Medical Specialist Corps.
So Colonel Vogel was the first chief
of the Army Medical Specialist Corps at that time.
And so she was instrumental in laying the foundations
for our corps, then which then continued then
into the '60s and the '70s and so forth.
- She had a remarkable career.
And I would encourage our listeners,
if you're interested in learning more,
to take a look at that essay in PTJ.
Well, Dr. Greathouse, I really wanna thank you
for writing that essay,
sharing your experience with our listeners today.
You really had a remarkable career and impact
on the PTs in the military.
And I thank you for your service
and thank you for your time today.
- Alan, thank you, Dr. Jenny.
Thank you for this opportunity.
Again, I always enjoy talking
about military physical therapy.
I still continue to support the program teaching
as an adjunct faculty down there.
And again, as people are listening to this,
if you have an interest in military physical therapy,
it is a specialty kind of area of practice,
but I encourage folks to seek out opportunities
in the military for physical therapy.
(upbeat music)
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Dr. David Greathouse discusses his essay on "U.S. Military Physical Therapy, 1970 to 2020" in a PTJ Author Interview.
The essay is part of a centennial series in PTJ focusing on the history of the profession.
Dr. Greathouse describes the evolution of military physical therapy, including the introduction of direct access programs.
Summary:
In a PTJ Author Interview, Dr. S. " The essay is part of a series in PTJ exploring the profession's history.
Dr. Greathouse recounts his career path from joining the Army for two years to staying for 26 years, highlighting experiences at Fort Riley and the development of direct access programs. He discusses the positive impact of direct access on patient care and outcomes, emphasizing the efficiency and effectiveness of the military model.
Dr. Greathouse also reflects on the support received from physicians, safety records, and the relevance of military PT practices to civilian settings. He recommends a military career for PTs due to educational opportunities, emphasis on readiness, and the unique experiences offered.
The conversation touches on the pioneering role of Colonel Emma Vogel in shaping military physical therapy. Dr. Greathouse's dedication to teaching and advocacy for military physical therapy shines through, encouraging interested individuals to explore this specialized area of practice.
FAQs
The essay is entitled "U.S. Military Physical Therapy, 1970 to 2020" and it discusses various aspects of the history of the profession.
Dr. Greathouse was intrigued by military physical therapy during a presentation by recruiters at his physical therapy school.
Dr. Greathouse underwent military schooling, served at various locations, pursued higher education, and held leadership positions within the Army Medical Specialist Corps.
The program was initiated due to a large number of musculoskeletal patients, a shortage of physicians, and the opportunity for physical therapists to order imaging and lab studies.
Physicians, especially orthopedic surgeons, were supportive of the program as it allowed them to focus more on clinics and surgeries.
There have been no records of malpractice or legal issues within the military related to physical therapists practicing in primary care and direct access.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.