AI, Truth, Justice & the Ideas That Could Change Humanity

Whakam to the U from Ashou, where we have honest conversations about business, life, ideas, and experiences shaping to the world. Today, I am excited to welcome a guest who sits at the fascinating intercession of Literature at Fisher Intelligence, Philosophy, Social Justice and Community Development. Joining us is Muammad Nabil, an accomplished author and creator of AIDOP, AI Debates on Once Publication. Muammad has authored a remarkable collection of works, including the Bachelor's of Egypt, lighting, populism, reflections on the new cycle of the pandemic, my interview with Charles G.P.T., Global Justice, Philosophical Debates with AI, ideas that survive AIDOP, says mind-free, humanity's money, and truth is sexy. Beyond writing, Muammad has been involved in initiatives for Western Community Development and Social Change, and is one of the founders of the ARAS, the ARASAS campaign. It's work-rises from fascinating questions. What happens when we use AI, not just as a tool, but as a partner in intellectual debate? I should humanity think about justice, truth, money, and freedom in an increasingly AI-driven world. And perhaps, most importantly, I can ideas move beyond books and conversation to actually create change. Muammad, welcome to the UFO Mass Show, it's a pleasure to have you here. It's a pleasure to join you here tonight, thank you for the warm introduction. You're welcome, Muammad. You've written about everything from Egypt and global justice to money, truth, and artificial intelligence. What is the common thread that connects all of your work? Well, the common thread is my value system. I believe in justice, freedom, truth, telling, compassion, and solidarity. These are my main values. So I'm trying to accomplish or elevate these values through my entire bibliography. Also, I have developed AIDOP, I have three main pillars to my philosophy. I developed AIDOP, which stands for AI Debates for Non-Publications. And I codified enlightened populism as a behavior pattern of communication. And I'm advocating for the establishment of a global government to be ruled by hyperlocal system assemblies. Yeah. Take us back to the beginning. What's best part your passion for writing, philosophy, and challenging conventional ideas? My passion for philosophy started when I was a teenager, and the episodes have been in love with philosophy. Philosophy is the love of wisdom, so loving philosophy seems like a virtue in my own life. And over time, I've developed my own frameworks according to you. Yeah. You've written several books and exposed some very big questions. Is there one question you find yourself returning to again and again? This question, I find myself returning to again and again, can humanity unite under a single government to decorate for all? Yeah. You created AIDOP, AI Debates on Non-Publications. What exactly is AIDOP, and what inspired you to create it? AIDOP or AI Debates on Non-Publications is a content creation framework. It involves a content creator from taking an AI tool to criticize their own content and publishing the entire analysis transcript of back-and-forth organization within 24 hours of the exchange. So basically you have a piece of content, and then you publish this original piece of content. Then you feed it into an AI tool, prompt the tool to criticize it, engage in back-and-forth organization, and publish the entire exchange within 24 hours. At the beginning, I thought books and ideas are typically that if they're not discussed and debated in the public, so I thought I'd accelerate this process by initiating debates with AI tools. So people can have a better starting point when they start debates on my own work. Then I realized that's revolutionary potential within publishing, education, policy making, humanities, and social sciences. Absolutely. What happens when you allow AI to debate, challenge or critique your own published ideas? AI tools are capable of, not all of them, but the ones I recommend, especially Church of T, Gemini, and Claude. These ones are capable of providing sharp criticism. These tools have been trained on huge episodes. They almost have the sum of human knowledge. So they can provide sharp criticism, and you can respond accordingly if you have counter-argments. Yeah. First AI ever changed your mind about something you wrote? One time in an AI/DUP session with Church of T, the tool told me that my work-life balance theory wasn't universal. It couldn't apply to everyone, and I accepted the criticism as valid, and I moved on to the next essay. Do you see AI primarily as a tool, a collaborator, a critique, or potentially some team was bigger in the future? Potentially something bigger in the future. Yet nowadays, and then the future, it can act as a critic, or act as a good source for criticism. Yeah. We are entering a world where AI can generate books, opinions, arguments, and even philosophical decisions. What do you think you must see uniquely bring to that conversation? What do I think you must bring to that conversation? Yeah. We created these tools. We are the minds behind these AI tools. And we shall maintain our superiority over time, and maintain our human sovereignty in the age of AI, not only through what I've created as AI/DUP, but through all of the similar initiatives. On the other hand, you have people using AI tools for ideas, generation, or ghostwriting in case of authors, and these people will lose their cognitive capabilities over time, because they are relying on tools to generate ideas for them. Yeah. You've written truth is sexy. In a world of misinformation, or within political polarization, and AI generated content, what does truth actually mean to you? For me, truth is the roasts out of facts. The roasts out of facts for any given matter. Yeah. Your work also explores global justice. What do you believe is one of the biggest injustices in the world, that people aren't talking about enough? Yes. Child labor is an issue related to human rights. It's global justice, and people don't talk about it enough. Yeah. You've explored the idea of aligning populism. What does that phrase mean to you? And what do you think modern society gets from a bad populism? Enlightened populism is a behavioural pattern of communication that involves listening to multiple experts, trying to understand how they reach certain conclusions, and investigating the information to the scourge the truth. It contrasts with the two dominant behavioural patterns of communication today's world, blind elitism, which entails blindly following an expert or an elite on a certain issue. And ignorant populism, which also involves the absence of investigation while relying on feelings or trends. So enlightened populism is a behavioural pattern of communication. It's a key solution to most of our troubles nowadays. Yeah. Do you think humanity is becoming better at thinking critically or at technology and social media, actually making us easier to manipulate? are not making anything, these are tools that we use as human beings. We are responsible for the results depending on our own use of the tools. So in many use cases, people are losing their critical thinking because they are submitting their own minds to trends or blindly following certain experts and stuff like that, or if they are using AI tools and for idea generation as previously discussed. So these people are losing their critical thinking. Others, however, are using the best amount of information that we have online to enhance their critical thinking and others are using AI tools in smart ways. For example, the way I'm using it through AI DUP. You've written humanity's money. What does a relationship with money reveal about human being and its societies with creative? As I mentioned earlier, advocating for the establishment of a global government to be ruled by hyperlocals as an assembliese. So humanity's money is a part of the books that establish this world's view. And humanity's money is mainly concerned with only one policy to be established. This policy is taxing billionaires out of existence. Arguments for their presence and their value in society are debunked and deconstructed one after another. So people can understand that we don't need billionaires in our lives. We need to expand the meta class by introducing basic human rights such as shelter, access to clean water and food, education, healthcare, freedom of expression, freedom of movement and stable speed internet connections. As for billionaires, we need to tax them out of existence by setting an alt-carp at 999 million dollars per person. If you could change one from the meta assumption, that's more than society has about success. Well, or progress, what would it be? I'd like to remove all of the labels right when left when communism, capitalism, whatever labels there might be because these labels have been acting as just labels, not just not ideologies like they used to be in the past. They've been reduced to labels, and I'd like to remove them because they make people affiliated with the stuff that they don't deeply understand, and people start getting into a state of belief, into things that they don't need to follow. What always you most about the direction humanity is adding? And what gives you the current system? We have technological breakthroughs, and only a few billionaires will benefit from these breakthroughs, and massive layoffs will shall be introduced soon because of these breakthroughs. And what gives me hope is that whenever we can unite the planet under a single government with equal rights for all, we can tax billionaires out of existence, dramatically reduce working hours instead of the massive layoffs, sharing actively sharing the benefits of technology, instead of letting a few individuals take all of the benefits, and having enough time and energy to practice enlightened populism, and vote directly on issues, instead of voting for representatives to vote on our behalf. If AI becomes significantly more intelligent and infrastructure than it is today, what principles do you believe humanity must protect at all costs? Justice, justice, freedom, truth, telling, compassion and solidarity, yet justice first. Absolutely, you've been involved in the Arrasa campaign, and several community development initiatives. What motivated you to move from writing about problems to actively trying to address them? Arrasa's campaign, when we found that Arrasa's campaign, we used to catch arrasas on the streets and spy on their backs the whole summer arraser to send a message to the overall community that sexual arrasment shouldn't be acceptable, and remind them that we, as a community, we need to reject this kind of behavior and fight it whenever applicable. This taught me a lot about human nature, as the campaign was pretty much successful, especially in its impact on the community, worldwide not only in Egypt. What are your lens from working directly with communities that you could never have learned from writing a book? Well, it's difficult to specify because usually everything in my own mind is integrated in one way or another. My old view is integrated, so I learned something from the community and then I complemented with something I've read in a book, and then I read an article about the same issue or concept, and then I learned more and more about it. So everything I've learned has multiple experts to it, multiple experts to it. You have on one side you have the community or face-to-face communication with the human beings. On the other hand, you have the internet or books or whatever, and then, collectively, they form my own logic. For someone listening, who sees a problem in their own community, but feels powerless to make a difference? Where should they start? It depends on their own problems, the problems they are seeking to solve, yet it's always smart to start looking for other people who are like-minded and see the same problem and would like to find a solution and start brainstorming together. Looking back at everything you've written and created. Which idea are you most passionate about people understanding? But no one monopolizes the truth. No one knows 100% of the truth on all matters they are concerned with. If you could have a conversation with your younger self before you began this journey, what will you tell him? I'd probably tell him, you're doing great, keep it up. What is one idea you want to listen us to question, rethink or act on after this conversation? Probably nationalism or patriotism, I believe nationalism is an absurd idea and it's treated like a virtual due to the indoctrination that happens through multiple regions of socialization, throughout a human being's life. My man, this has been such a fascinating conversation. We've touched on artificial intelligence, philosophy, truth, justice, money, activism, and the feature of humanity. But underneath all of it is really a conversation about one thing. I will choose to think on what we choose to do with our ideas. Thank you for joining me on the U from my show and for sharing your perspective with us, for the pleasure of you on. It's a pleasure joining you. Thank you for hosting. I welcome my man. We are going to listen to us more about the work you do and it's a connection to you. Through my website, Muhammad Nabildotoyl, I'm OH, A-M-E-D and A-B-I-L dot W-O-R-L-D, it would be helpful if you can add it to the show notes. Right, and to everyone listening, if this conversation challenged the way you think about AI, society, or even your own ideas, don't just listen, question, explore and engage until next time. I'm Ufuma and this has been the Ufuma Show.