Adolescent Literacy, Episode 3: What adolescent readers really need, with Jeanne Schopf
50m 42s
In this episode, Susan Lambert hosts Jeannie Schop, a literacy expert with over 35 years of experience, to discuss the critical role of leadership in transforming adolescent literacy. Schop shares her personal story: trained in whole language, she moved to middle school teaching and discovered the science of reading after her own daughter struggled with dyslexia. This led to an “ego death” as she realized many students had been underserved. She emphasizes that system-level barriers—such as unclear coaching roles, resistance to data, and leaders not viewing themselves as literacy leaders—must be addressed. Key strategies include implementing universal screening three times a year, depersonalizing data to focus on systems rather than teacher blame, and building trusting relationships to foster buy-in. Schop stresses that most struggling secondary readers are “instructional casualties” who were never properly taught foundational skills. She urges teachers to be persistent advocates and leaders to own the data and problems, shifting beliefs about student disengagement to understand its root causes. The conversation highlights that if literacy is prioritized, student engagement, learning, and growth will follow.
Hey listeners, it's Susan. My second substack post is up. I wrote about teaching as professional work and why teachers need supportive systems. I hope you'll check it out and subscribe at scienceofreading.substack.com. Going forward, I'll be sharing more insights and takeaways from my podcast recordings as well as my overall adventures in the world of literacy. Again, subscribe today at scienceofreading.substack.com. If we get literacy right, we get everything else right. Particularly in the secondary space, we're going to have kids coming to school. We're going to have learning and teaching and growing. This is Susan Lambert and welcome to Science of Reading the Podcast from Amplify. This is part three of our adolescent literacy miniseries exploring the research on serving this particular group of learners. In parts one and two, we learned about a new model for thinking about adolescent literacy, called the reading circuit, and we learned some lessons from some transformational gains at a Vermont middle and high school. Today, we'll talk about the role of leadership in driving change at the secondary level. We'll explore some of the common system level barriers and unpack how scheduling, data, and coaching all play an important role in big change. And once again, we'll explore why beliefs are especially important when it comes to serving this group of learners. I'm joined by Jeannie Schop, a literacy expert motivational keynote speaker and educational leader with more than 35 years of experience. She's the editor and contributing author of Reading Isn't Optional, fulfilling the promise of literacy for secondary students. And before we jump in, a quick reminder to go check out our free summer learning kit for middle school literacy instruction. This kit brings together strategies, checklists, and activities designed specifically for middle school educators. And you can download it right now at amplify.com/adolescentliteracybundle. There's also a link in the show notes. But now, please enjoy this conversation with Jeannie Schop. Well, I am so excited to have you on our podcast today. We have Jeannie Schop with us. Amazing. Thank you for joining us. Thank you for having me with an incredible honor. We are going to talk about something that I know is near and dear to your heart. We're going to introduce our listeners to a new resource, a new book that they can order. But we're not going to get there yet. But I'm super excited about it. The first thing we want our listeners to know is just a little bit about you, your journey, and sort of position yourself in this world of secondary literacy or adolescent literacy, which we're going to talk about. So go ahead. Yes, thank you so much. Well, I started teaching in 1989, and I was born and raised in whole language. And so I was reading writing workshop teacher for big portion of my career. And then when I moved into the third grade setting, our school became a reading first school. And so I began my training in what we know today as the science of reading. But as a third grade teacher, I was a little bit on the tail end of that initial training. And so I just started vaguely hearing about digraphs and diphthongs. And I really wasn't quite sure what all that meant. And along that same time, my own daughter, my youngest daughter, was having a hard time learning to read. And so I just was really pressing that she just needed more time. And she just needed to be read too more because that's really what my training was seeped in. But underneath it all, I just, I had the sense that she had something called dyslexia. But I wasn't really around any kind of information that would really help me kind of break through that mindset shift that I had to have. And so then I decided after that period in third grade. And she started moving through and she was a great compensator and she did fine for a long time. But then I had an opportunity, a sixth grade job opened up in the middle school as a reading teacher. And I had my master's degree in reading. And yet I was not trained in the science of reading. I did not know how to teach a child to read. And so I said, I want to be in the middle school. And people thought it was crazy. You're going to go to the middle school. And I'm like, yes, I think it'll be a lot of fun. And so I volunteered to distribute and I jumped up into the middle school. And I became this sixth grade reading teacher at that time. And I had no curriculum. I had no particular standards. I just kind of like created what I thought I needed to do at that point in time. But at that same time, the special led director in our district asked me if I would be interested in taking a structured literacy course to serve the kids with IEPs and dyslexia on our caseloads in the middle school. And I said, yes, because I just knew there was more out there that I didn't know. And I didn't have access to. And so I went to this training in the summertime and I realized, oh my good gravy. Like if my daughter had had this instruction, she might have had an easier time of it through school. But the irony, Susan, is that we were a reading first school. And my daughter was in first grade during the reading first era. And she should have had that instruction. And she didn't get it. Wow. Because the belief systems we all had, right, about how kids learn to read and to cling. And I had to have my own ego death, right? Because I was so clung to what I believed. This is what you had to do because this is what I was trained that in that whole experience of getting that structured literacy training, I had my own ego death. Like, oh my, there were so many kids that passed through my classrooms that I didn't know why they were struggling. And I didn't teach them the read. And I didn't even teach my own daughter, right? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And that was very painful journey for me. But was that journey that I got that training? And I'd really started like, this is the science of reading. And this is how you teach kids to read. And then the year later, Kamakor came through. And I became the seventh grade English language arts teacher. And that's where structured literacy came to live and breathe in my classroom. And I became this cog as far as interventionists in my building and really bringing structured literacy to our children. So third grade up to middle school. So that's how you made it to the secondary level. Really interesting story. And I've said it many times on this podcast when we ask folks to tell their story how many of us in this work have a child that has struggled to learn how to read. It seems to be a common theme. Either that or there's a lot of kids that were struggling to learn how to read. And it might be a little bit of both. I don't know. But that's really interesting. Yeah. And so my daughter ended up getting a diagnosis when she got into high school because her compensation strategy is weren't working anymore in high school. Oh, right. Right. And she started really kind of struggling in math where she's never struggled before. And it just got really hard for her. And she started also showing the negative effects of the trauma. Really the social emotional trauma of knowing that she was a bright, bright child and a bright person and should be able to read like her peers and couldn't. So then it was this whole defeatist shame. And she still struggles with that today. Oh, man, it's so true. So true. So you were teaching in sixth, seventh grade, but you also transitioned a little bit to a coach at the secondary level. Can you talk a little bit about that work and some of the things that you saw as you were coaching others? Well, my biggest challenge because this position, you know, became open in the middle school and I was serving as an interventionist and I believed I could do the work, but was getting the job and really just my principal not being real clear about the roles and responsibilities of the work that I was to do in the middle school. Okay. And therefore my colleagues not really being crystal clear about the roles and responsibilities of my work and what I was supposed to do in the building. So I kind of had a manufacturer on my own, you know, job description and say, is this what you want me to do? And then share it with the staff. And of course, because and many people in this work Susan, we get this enlightenment, right? We get this knowledge that we didn't have and we just want to pour into all the people that we come across of that this is if we just did this, right? Our kids would learn to read and then you're met immediately with what resistance, right? And I had that experience and so I had to learn, right, that people don't care how much you know until they know how much you care. And I just really had to find the teachers that I had built a relationship with that they were willing to work alongside me to support their students. And then the big shift in our building and our middle school was bringing in evidence-based screening assessment tools that really could identify the kids we needed to find and give them the instruction they needed. And so when we could wrap ourselves around the data and the implications of our instruction, then we started getting more buy-in but it even still was more difficult.
We had teachers, I'd teachers that say, I don't really like talking about data. Because what we do as educators is we personalize it. Like it's me, like I'm not a good teacher and I'm not doing well. And so what I've always tried to do in this work even as a consultant is depersonalize the data. Like this is really a reflection of our systems. And as James Clear in his work in Atomic Cabets, say he has this great line that I don't think ever he meant to be a line that we use in education, but we use it. His line of, we don't rise the level of our goals, but we fall to the level of our systems. - Oh, I love that. I love that. - But so building those systems really helped me kind of bring people along. - Yeah, let's talk about that assessment and that data because back up a little bit, I think as elementary educators, I felt like when I was in the classroom and when I was a administrator, I felt like at the elementary level, we were a little more aware of the importance of even formative data or what we typically call summative data, any kind of information we take in, we'd feed that back into the system to improve our teaching, right? Like so it's not like you said, it's not about, oh, I'm a bad teacher, it's about, oh, this is where this student is right now and this is how I need to adjust something, right? Adjust something and adjust something. And I always felt like at the middle and high school level, that assessment data ended up being more like you said about a reflection of, well, I don't wanna look at it because I'm not a good teacher. I have this curriculum where I have these things I need to teach, I need to keep moving through the content or the kids are never willing to get it. So all I'm trying to say here is that the timing, the elementary teachers have all day long, secondary teachers have this window of opportunity, the system to your point isn't always set up appropriately to help us use that data in terms of thinking about what we can do next. That was a really long way to say. It's important to understand where students are at. Well, and you and I have been in this game a long time and I remember when I first started teaching, I did just that, I had curriculum, I had assessments at the end and I taught what I was supposed to teach and I gave the grade that I was supposed to give and that grade went on the report card and the students good the grade and I kept just, just kept doing the same thing. And it really wasn't until when I was, I started actually in sixth grade and then went to fifth grade and then went to third grade, but it really wasn't until when I was in third grade and we became a reading first school that we started having a screening tool that we started using. And when that data came through with that universal screener, it's still, we still were not in that paradigm of shifting our mindset around, okay, they're behind, what are we gonna do to catch them up? It was more, they're behind, let's give them intervention, so then they qualify for special education. And that's what happened with my own daughter, right? They just thought they're behind, she needs special education and I'm like, no, you know, we need to figure this out, but we weren't quite caught up to that. So then when we think about going into the secondary space, we're not even close to having, into my work across the country, systems in place where kids are getting screened universally three times a year and we're looking at that data in ways like, what are we going to do to catch them up with their unfinished learning? Because, you know, the reality is in read line, he spoke to this, and I speak to this often that of the 75% of the kids that we have that are struggling, particularly in the upper grades, 90% of them are instructional casualties, like they were never really taught to read. - Yeah, so true, instructional casualties, that's an important term to say, it's not, therefore, they didn't get the instruction they needed to have in the previous grades, and we need to figure out what we can do to help them get it now. And we need to have the systems in place, so the assessment system in place, so we screen, and then we look at the screening data, and we have our schedule ready, where kids can get that intervention that they need to build up those foundational gaps, as well as integrating that really good instruction into our core instruction. - Yeah, absolutely. So you went from practitioner, you went from in your district to being this national consultant, and I'd really like for you to talk a little bit about what did you notice that was happening across the nation? 'Cause you know, it can be one thing for it to happen in your own backyard and the context you're working in, but did you have some ahas about what was happening across the nation as you started to work there? - Well, I mean, I think the ahas I'm having is the reality of what I experienced in my own district as the experiences that a lot of me people are having still everywhere. Did that surprise you? - It does, but yet in a way, it doesn't. - Okay. - Because, and even in my own district, when I came in with this information, we started meaning our transition into getting assistance in place and changing our schedule. The reality is that everything rises and falls on leadership. And as much as I really knew, this is what had to happen with kids, and I could do it in my classroom. I couldn't break that barrier to lift it beyond my four walls in my classroom until I really started bringing my school leader along with me. And so when I'm in schools across the country, schools that are really shifting on a dime is because leaders are owning the data and they're owning the conversations and they're owning the problems so they can be part of the solution. - Hmm. And I think educators, whether they're elementary, middle or high school right now, will connect with that because I know we've heard a lot of teachers say, "Listen, I'm trying in my own classroom. I really am, but it seems like I'm only making a little tiny bit of difference and what can I do next?" And so I've heard lots of people say, bring in your leadership. Like, it's those system level barriers you're talking about, isn't it? - Mm-hmm. - Because it has to start, you know, and I know our school leaders, they're working hard. Right? - Oh yeah. - They're managing their schools. Their day is constantly being intercepted by text messages of this situation and that situation and so they're managing. - Oh yeah. - But this is what I truly believe. - Yeah. - The vast majority of our students can access grade level texts, particularly in the secondary space. We're gonna have kids coming to school. We're gonna have kids staying in the classroom. We're gonna have learning and teaching and growing. We're gonna have all those things. So we really have to really just understand that we have to dive into why our kids disenchanted and why our kids unmotivated and why are do we have outbursts in our classrooms? - Yeah, yeah, yeah. If you had a piece of advice for teachers about bringing leadership in, because I know you tried to do that in your own context, do you have any advice for them? And we're gonna talk about leaders too, but first let's look at teachers like what would be your advice. - Don't give up. - Oh yeah. - Just be persistent. Be that large voice in the room that just will not stop. And I know for me, you know, I had the luxury of having a school leader that had his own students coming through the district. - Okay. - And when I personalized reading and literacy to his own children, that helped him lean in and lead. - Mm, yeah. - And I think as you said, we're all, most of us are in this space because we have a personal story, but we all have a personal story. We all have our own children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews that have a personal story of reading not becoming easy. - Yeah. - And that it not being okay that we continue doing what we've always done. - Mm. - Because as Stephanie Stoller said in a recent podcast, we know too much to fail so many. - Oh, that's, yeah, that is brilliant. And it's so true. And what you highlighted early on about your own daughter and it's shameful to kids because they know they can't read like some of their peers. And I don't know that they have the tools to even be able to talk about it so as adults in the classrooms and in leadership positions. It's really imperative for us to get this thing right. - And I think what's gonna help us get us right is overcoming our own belief system about our students that are struggling. - Yeah. - Because particularly in the upper grades, our belief system about our struggling students impacts our instruction. It impacts our expectations on our children. And if we don't wrestle with that about our own belief system about children's who are struggling because what happens is particularly in the upper grades, it's like, well, the kids are not motivated. They didn't try. They're not engaged. And that's where we have to lean into, well, why are they unmotivated and why are they disengaged? - Yeah, it's such a theme with adolescent literacy to think about the mindset that we have. And I think that's really important. And I kind of want to come back to that because I think there's some barriers.
that we want to talk about in our message or in your message to leadership, there's some real barriers that leadership can help with, right? Do you want to talk about some of those? Well, particularly, and I've heard it, you know, from leaders too, as the first barrier is themselves, seeing themselves as literacy leaders, as instructional leaders. Yeah, yeah. That's the first barrier. Tell me more about that. Well, because our school leaders, they're trained in managing, you know, a lot of them come through as an educator themselves that really were not trained on what really good instruction is and, you know, what data systems tell you. So they're coming into this space with their own belief system about how to lead. And they don't see themselves as leaders of literacy or leaders of instruction. And once they start to see that in themselves, then they start getting close to the data or making sure that we have the right data system in place. Because, and all honestly, they're the ones making those decisions. And so really not being grounded on how children learn to read and what kind of data is going to give us the right instruction, you know, we're not going to have the right tools in the upper grades. But to me, I think those are the first two steps, right? Having them see themselves and the research is really clear, strong instructional leadership, really making a difference for reading outcomes. And we know that also to be true with our implementation science, that if we have, right, the enabling context, which is MTSS, which is leaders, which is culture. And then we have all those evidence-based instructional tools and assessments we can improve outcomes. So really it starts with our leaders. And then once their leaders see themselves as literacy leaders and instructional leaders and understand the science of reading how children learn to read, they're going to bring in the data systems. And then they're going to make sure that we have schedules in place that is going to serve our students. So in my particular experience, I did have a leader that saw himself as an instructional leader. And he created a schedule where our kids got their core instruction. And we had a block. We had a block where it was our wind time. All kids got intervention or instruction. And it was every day. I had a luxury and I talked to a middle school specialist and teachers all the time. I say, I had my students five days a week for 45 minutes and I could teach them to read. So let's stop there. What is wind time? So like what everyone needs time? Okay. What I need time. So an elementary school really good about categorizing like we have a wind time, what everyone needs time, where we kind of build in these systems of support and given that extra dosage. But we don't really see that in our upper grades. They have so much unfinished learning that we have to have, you know, time in our schedule, our schedule that supports instruction because teachers, they are tethered to their core curriculum in their content areas. And they do have to teach their content. And so when we have kids that have unfinished learning and foundational skills, it's really our moral imperative to teach them. Yeah. Yeah. And in the middle school where we don't have graduation credits. So part of the issue here is you can have a great assessment and understand those kids that are at risk and need some extra support. But if you don't have that time built into your schedule in middle and high school to give them that support, then what happens, right? What do you do about that? So that's a little bit of a paradigm shift, isn't it, to build that into the schedule? Well, right. And that's why, you know, our graduation rates are increasing yet. And our national assessment of educational progress came out in 2024. You know, we have 70% of our kids graduating not at the proficient level. Right. Yeah. Yeah. Give them what they need, right? Put time in the schedule. That's a leadership leader move. That's our leader move. Another leader move is quite frankly is making sure people are trained and they have good curriculum and making sure that they get training on the good curricular tools, right? Yeah. So they can deliver it. And that's really a critical piece too. Yeah. Because we can have a tool, but if I never got training on it, then I'm not going to serve the kids in the way that they need. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Let's talk a little bit about that training because I would imagine that there are a lot of leadership. There is an elementary school that says, I don't know how kids learn how to read. I don't know the cognitive capacities I need to support. And so what would you say to leadership who is we need to make this change? But I'm not a literacy expert. How can I lead this school when I'm not an expert in literacy? They have to also have the same ego depth that I did and many other teachers did. Like we weren't trained. We don't know. But I need to learn. Because in all reality, right, you can have this beautiful vision and this wonderful mission that is on the wall. But teachers are going to buy into the leader before they buy into the vision. And they're only going to buy into that leader if they have the trust and the credibility to follow them. Yeah. And I would imagine as a leader, it takes a little bit of being humble and being willing to say, I don't know, but we might have to learn this together. So taking that step together is really important. It's really important that they are leading us and they bring in professional development. And they're not on their computers. They're completely engaged with the learning and growing together as a unit, as a team, because really we're here to serve our children. And we want everybody wants what's best for them. But the reality is many of us were not trained in instruction and explicit systematic instruction. Not everybody had the privilege of being taught on what good instruction is. And they certainly have not been trained on how the brain learns and how to bring that instruction to life into our classrooms. Yeah. Such important things. Okay. So I think I took us on a rabbit trail there. But let's go back to some of these system level barriers. Anything else you want to highlight in terms of system level barriers? Well, not only do we have to have an assessment protocol that's in place, but we also have to have our data team meetings. So as many leaders in the space say, we have data, right? But we just got to get around and talk about it and then have it leave that data meeting with a plan on how it's going to improve our instruction. So anytime we meet, right? It's always around what is our data telling us, whether in the middle school and high school, just helping middle school and high school teachers understand the role of formative assessment, being attached to whatever my learning target is. And really looking deeply at my formative assessment and did I did my kids learn what they were expected to learn if not what can I do because how well I teach equals how well they learn what can I do differently next time rather than saying, well, they just didn't try or they weren't engaged. So having time in the schedule that allows middle school and high school teachers to regularly talk about their formative assessment as it's attached to our learning targets and then look at really the assessment protocol that we are gathering as related to oral reading fluency measures and our foundational skills and kind of marrying those two together in understanding that because I was just recently asked to be an advocate in an IEP meeting and this particular student had really slow oral reading fluency measure. She was accurate, but her rate was way beyond what she needed to have as to be able to access grade level text. Okay. And as I listened to the special ed teacher speak, he's basically using the language of well, she just needs to improve her comprehension. Okay. And I'm like, we really don't understand what kind of data we need to be collecting and what the data is telling us and what kind of instruction our student needs in order to close those gaps. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So what would your advice be like because okay, so we have oral reading fluency measure, which is a good indicator, right? A good proxy for comprehension. The student is accurate, great. That's important too, but the rate isn't appropriate. So what was the solution there? What's the next step? Well, as an advocate, right? I was not able to, you know, continue this conversation. But if I could have, I would say if the student is 98% accurate on the oral reading fluency measure, we have to work on automaticity of word reading. And so we need lots and lots of practice at reading words at the phrase and sentence level and the passage level. So that's what I would recommend. But that is not just special education challenge in itself. I was going to say the same thing. It is also the role and responsibility of the classroom teacher to ensure that children are in text and reading text, choral reading, clothes reading, echo reading, shared structure partner reading. They have to work together because the gaps are too big to address an isolation. And then back to leaders, sometimes we have this broad stroke about who a leader is in the building. And yes, it's the building leader, but it's quite frankly the special education director that also needs to be leading this because they are the ones that are signing their names off on IEPs that are not written and aligned to the science and what kids really need to close the gaps. And that is, goes back to, sorry, we're going to loop back again to professional development and knowledge if you don't have an understanding about how comprehension is impacted by word reading, automatic reading, prosody, right? Then you won't know how to make a very specific recommendation or how to support that student then in getting where they need to get. And so one of the work that I did in one school district was working with a special ed director and the special ed teachers helping them understand how children learn to read and what the data
is telling you and writing appropriate IEP goals either grounded in word recognition or grounded in fluency or grounded in language comprehension. So if we have a student who has the appropriate rate and has great accuracy but still can't make a mental model or comprehend then we're talking about language deficits. And so let's bring in a language screener and let's bring in language intervention. Yeah such a good point. Well all this probably then leads to a reason for your co-authoring and editing this book. And the title of the book is called Reading isn't optional fulfilling the promise of literacy for secondary students. So first of all why this book and why now? Well you know we know that right now we have a lot of kids as the national data is indicating going into middle and high school that has so much unfinished learning. And we continue to just push them through and push them into graduation. And so this is really an unfulfilled promise for our students and you know there's a lot of kids that are in these words in this text of kids that I worked with in my own building in my own daughters that deserve to have high quality instruction in middle and high school. And we're not on the receiving end of it. And therefore you know internalize that they're not smart enough. They're not good enough. And have this depression and the shame that goes along with kids who are every day faced with I can't do what my peers can do. I must be stupid. And going into spaces now where I'm talking to teachers, good friends of mine who are in education and talking to teachers that say you know what is the science of reading? Is there a book for me? And I would say no there really isn't. And realizing that you know I always say like when I when I was working with my students and I was doing this intervention and COVID hit and my principal kept pulling me to cover choir and band and cover these classes. And I'd say I have to teach these kids to read. It's a moral imperative. I reach in the read and he goes and I was like if not me who? Yeah. And so for this this book it's like is if not us in middle and high school. Right who? Who's going to teach them? And then realizing it's one thing because the research season has been there since 2008 the IES practice guides came out on improving adolescent literacy. The new guides came out two years three years ago on interventions grade four through nine. So we've we've had the research available to us and I did I did the work in my classroom. But couldn't have really transformed kids lives without the collective call. The collective call of systems in place. And understanding with a science of reading as an understanding what implementation science is and understanding having that MTSS system and having that coaching and having that leader lead. You know I can do this work in my classroom but it's only going to impact a few kids that I've control over. And so that's where I started ruminating with this. And then just I started having conversations with other leaders and they're like well, Jeannie why don't you write it. And I think in our pre-call you really talked about this idea of this book is not so much about instruction which it is. I mean there's and we can link our listeners in the show notes to those IES guides because they're brilliant and fantastic. But this book is really about transformation right going beyond the classroom. Right. This is really a call for action. Because in realizing my own personal experience and how you know just the resistance I even experienced I realized one is too small of a number for greatness. We really truly want to change kids lives and graduate readers. It's going to take all hands on DAC. Everybody has to have a voice. And so when I was processing this I thought well you know you know I can write about leadership and I can write about systems and I can write about coaching. But there are other people who have way bigger voices that have done this work that need to be part of this text. And so that's really what I realized like you know success really is the team sport. And I needed to have a team, a team of voices that were going to just raise this to a new level than just me writing a book and having to go out there. Yeah. Can you talk just a little bit about some of the topics that you cover throughout this book just to give our listeners a sense of your table of contents if you will and what they can expect. Yes. So I mean I had the honor to write the first chapter which is really about our belief systems. Because I truly truly believe beliefs right. If we don't change our mindset about our students that are struggling it's going to end there. Yeah. Yeah. I because I go back to my own daughter who was in first grade and should have received structured literacy based on the tenants of the National Reading Panel report during the reading first initiative yet she didn't get it why. Because the teacher didn't buy in and the leader didn't either. And so that's why it's all about changing our belief system. And then of course we needed to have like okay I'm changing my belief system. I know I have to teach kids you read but what is the science of reading. So we had to have a chapter on what is the science of reading. What is the science of instruction because I might know okay I got to teach them to read words but if I don't have good instruction in my classroom good explicit instruction I'm not going to move the needle either. And then I have to have understanding about implementation science because as I took my point earlier you know if we want to have outcomes we have to have all those systems in place right. So those are the beginning chapters and then we get into the foundations of literacy transformation on leadership. We need our leaders to lead us. We need our leaders to be instruction leaders. We need our leaders to lean into what they don't know to learn alongside us and to lead us. And then we need to have a system in place an MTS system that helps us rise to a level of our goals. If we don't have a system in place I can be teaching my hardwood in my classroom but it's not going to make a dent right. And then of course we need to have coaching and you know it's a lot of people talk about having coaches but it has to be really really clear because we know what the research says Joyce and showers did this research years ago that we do professional development what we have 5% of those teachers that actually translate what they've learned into their classroom. I was one of those I'm sure Susan you were one of those right you were one of those that said oh my gosh you know I got to do it right away but there are a few teachers like that out there and so we need to have somebody working through that instruction and helping us grow in our instruction that's a colleague a partner a think partner that works alongside that principle and just as that bridge to that gap. So that's why we have to have that because frankly we don't have those pieces and parts that's going to be really difficult to change our reading outcomes. Yeah and to be fair sometimes as a teacher I felt like I would go to this professional development or hear something and I would get excited about it but there was always something else that you know that took my attention away like I had to do this or I had to do that and so this idea of implementation after you learn something exciting is often difficult and it's better with a team right it's better when you have people help you. Right and and that's why we need the coaching but also to your point Susan what made it difficult is is conflicting priorities. Yeah yeah and what I've noticed in schools is we have too many initiatives and and in first and foremost we got to get literacy right. Yeah we get literacy right we get a lot of other things right and we get instruction right we get a lot of things right. Yeah yeah it's a really good point it's the point about you can't put something on your plate your plate is going to overflow so what are we going to not do deciding what not to do is often super important. It's at de-implementation. The de-implementation. Which we're not so good at because we keep doing what we've always done and we just don't rethink to say hmm is what I'm doing working for students. Yeah. If you're working for the vast majority of my students is this data I'm collecting or are we even talking about it. Yeah that episode we did with Doug Reeves was brilliant about that right like this whole concept of what does implementation and de-implementation look like so it's a really good point. Okay so back to the TOC what else are we going to expect from this book Jeannie. Well of course we can have the foundation of transformation and then then comes okay now what do I do about it. Yeah and and what does it look like in the secondary space and so we have brilliant leaders experts that across across the country who have put their expertise in their words into this book so we're going to have a chapter on what is comprehension because so many of you know when I was doing coaching in my building I would have teachers come up to me saying my kids can't comprehend my kids can't comprehend. Well what does that mean? So we had to have a chapter that broke that down like this is what it really means and then of course because we're in the secondary space we have to speak to our content teachers and the whole idea of disciplinary literacy that has gotten a lot of attention lately. No doubt it's one of those hot terms and so bringing in Nancy Hennessy and Julie Salamone who are boots on the ground doing this work to really show
shed light on what that actually is and what it looks like in your classroom was a key piece to putting that section together. And of course, speaking of assessments, we have to have a chapter on fluency. And because that chapter drives everything else we do. Because if teachers understand oral reading fluency and what fluency means, they can really understand what they're seeing with their students. So if I was in that IEP meeting as an advocate and we had an or in fluency data, even though I had that data because they didn't, being able to look at that and say, oh, look at where the rate is, they're so slow in their reading rate that they're accurate, but they can't, they have their working memory is processing all of these words. They have no working memory available to actually integrate what they just read. Yeah. And so if secondary teachers understand what fluency is and how how it exasperates yourself in the classroom, then we can make instructional lose to support them. Yeah. Yeah. That's a really good point. Really good point. So we have that chapter. And then because we know the role of so much of the role of comprehension is vocabulary in that has been around forever, right? About explicit vocabulary instruction, but yet it's not coming to life in classrooms. We have to get it to come to life. We have to be real intentional about that. And we have to change our instruction around how we integrate vocabulary into our classrooms. Then there's a chapter on, well, my really important chapter, it's all important, but the one that I really am gathered to because it's worked that I really did in my classroom is bringing oral language into our classrooms. And it's so critical. I know you just spoke to that about our elementary years and our kids talking, it's even more critical in our secondary space. I think the research is really clear that we are kids maybe have 1.7 seconds of conversation in a classroom. And they need way more than that. And we need to have them. If we want them to write these really complicated, high level pieces of writing, which we expect our kids to do in secondary, then guess what? We have to have high level academic conversations. Yeah, for sure. So that's in there. And then of course, critical chapter is because we have so many kids that aren't accessing grade level texts, we need to have a chapter that helps teachers scaffold. Because what I saw happening in my own personal experience and I see happening is we have kids who can access grade level texts. So what do we do? We lower expectations and we lower our standards. So rather than giving them the book to kill a mockingbird, we give them a graphic novel to kill the cliff notes, the cliff notes versioned the leveled text idea, right? We're going to lower the rigor so that you feel comfortable and confident doing it. But yet we're robbing them, right? I'm having them of critical vocabulary and syntax. And so what we have to do is we have to help teachers understand how to scaffold that. And then the last chapter, which I think is just imperative right now is a chapter on our English learners. What are you most excited about for this book to because it as of our recording time, I think it has not yet been released. Is that correct? Yes. Almost we're getting close. What are you most excited about when this book hits the market? I'm super excited that the NCTQ accepted it so that means it can be on a list for books for at the college level. Oh great. Because we have to have teachers who are coming into our classroom understanding the science of reading, implementation science, MTSS, all those parts and pieces. So they can help raise the lid in all of their buildings. I'm super excited about getting in the hands and our higher ed. I'm super excited that it's going to be the it was selected as the national reading league chapter book study for the summer. Oh, that's so great. That's so great. Because we need to get it out there everywhere. And we need to also bring in our upper our middle school and our secondary teachers into the reading league chapters and get them evolved because we're serving all children in our state. So I'm super excited for the potential of that. Yeah. I just hope it gives people hope that they can change the lives of their students. Well, and what's so exciting to me is I have lots of middle high school teachers ask they want to know what does the science of reading mean for me? How can it help me in my classroom? And you just filling this gap by helping them see with a book, right? Like books are always so great. And by the time listeners are hearing this, it'll actually be available. So that's cool. But this is just a really amazing space and an amazing resource that you're bringing to middle and high school teachers and administrators to to really help support because I truly believe that they want to help too. But we haven't as a field necessarily provided as much support or information for them. Into your point, two stories. So one of them I have a good friend of mine who teaches in high school. And I talk to her often and she's often like I know we see everywhere our whole department sees we don't have kids that can read. We're all struggling. This is a big high school. She's like, but we don't know what to do. And I say, yeah, but we do, but we do know what to do. Right. Our leaders need to lead because our kids, it comes down to our kids, they're suffering. And it's not okay. And so I had a student seventh grade that I heard all the stories about him. Again, beliefs, I believe the struggling students, oh, give him anything he refused to do it. And love that that was from that family. Blub, blah, blah, I heard it all. And then when he came into my room for intervention, he you could tell he was oppositioly defiant. He was that wanting to be there. And he refused to engage. And it took me a few days. And then I finally started just, you know, breaking down the reading brain and how children learn to read. And I explained to him, and as other kids in the room, I said, you know, you were never taught to read. And it's not your fault. In this 200 pound kid, broke down in sobs and said, I have felt dumb my whole life. That's what this is really about. Yeah, that's a really powerful reminder of the influence teaching, quality teaching can have on lives. Before we wrap up, do you have any closing thoughts, pieces of advice for those middle and high school teachers or leaders that are working to make change? I mean, I think it's the same story I had to tell myself was I needed to let go of my, my belief systems about instruction in children and reading. I really needed to lean in to what I didn't know with humility and honesty and authenticity. And I said, learn and learning never stops. You just keep learning every day like you are I am because I know we want what's best for our students. Well, I want to say thank you not just for this podcast, but I want to say thank you for the work that you have done and continue to do. And especially thank you for pulling together a group of experts and co-authoring and editing this book that we can get this out to the world and support others and making that change in middle and high school for students. So thank you so much, Jeannie. And thanks for joining us. Thank you Susan. It was really truly a privilege and um, let's keep this work going. That was Jeannie shop, a literacy expert motivational keynote speaker and educational leader with more than 35 years of experience. She is the editor and contributing author of reading isn't optional, fulfilling the promise of literacy for secondary students. As the founder of pathways towards literacy, she partners with schools and leaders to implement evidence-based practices. Visit the show notes for links. And don't forget to download our summer learning kit, which is filled with evidence-based strategies to strengthen your middle school literacy instruction. Get your white paper, ebooks, and more today by visiting amplify.com/adolescentliteracybundle. Again, there's also a link in the show notes. Next time, we're closing out this adolescent literacy mini-series by talking about policy with Dr. Kimiana Burke. Dr. Burke will detail the similarities and differences in policy at the adolescent and early literacy levels. So we have started with K-3. We know that there are things that work. We know how to take this comprehensive approach. And I think that we had to do that, right? We had to see something working to be able to say, "Okay, now it's time to extend this beyond third grade." That's next time on Science of Reading the Podcast from Amplify. I'm Susan Lambert. Thank you so much for listening.
(upbeat music) - Hey listeners, it's Susan here to put a new research brief on your radar. Amplifies and of year early literacy data just released. And findings suggest that year over year early literacy gains are flat for the first time since the pandemic. Get a clear picture of where students are at and help plan strong instruction for the year ahead by checking out the full report at amplify.com/end of year data. Again, get insights and recommendations now at amplify.com/end of year data. (upbeat music)
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
The episode is part three of Amplify’s adolescent literacy miniseries, focusing on leadership’s role in driving change at the secondary level.
Guest Jeannie Schop shares her personal journey from a whole-language teacher to a science of reading advocate, motivated by her daughter’s struggles with dyslexia.
Common system-level barriers include lack of clear roles for literacy coaches, resistance to data use, and leaders not seeing themselves as instructional literacy leaders.
Key levers for change include universal screening three times a year, using data to inform instruction rather than labeling teachers, and building strong relationships to overcome resistance.
A critical message is that most struggling adolescent readers are “instructional casualties”—not taught to read effectively—and that mindset shifts about student motivation are essential.
Summary:
In this episode, Susan Lambert hosts Jeannie Schop, a literacy expert with over 35 years of experience, to discuss the critical role of leadership in transforming adolescent literacy. Schop shares her personal story: trained in whole language, she moved to middle school teaching and discovered the science of reading after her own daughter struggled with dyslexia. This led to an “ego death” as she realized many students had been underserved.
She emphasizes that system-level barriers—such as unclear coaching roles, resistance to data, and leaders not viewing themselves as literacy leaders—must be addressed. Key strategies include implementing universal screening three times a year, depersonalizing data to focus on systems rather than teacher blame, and building trusting relationships to foster buy-in. Schop stresses that most struggling secondary readers are “instructional casualties” who were never properly taught foundational skills.
She urges teachers to be persistent advocates and leaders to own the data and problems, shifting beliefs about student disengagement to understand its root causes. The conversation highlights that if literacy is prioritized, student engagement, learning, and growth will follow.
FAQs
The episode focuses on the role of leadership in driving literacy change at the secondary level, covering system barriers, scheduling, data, and coaching.
The guest is Jeannie Schop, a literacy expert, motivational speaker, and educational leader with over 35 years of experience, and editor of 'Reading Isn't Optional'.
The reading circuit is a new model for thinking about adolescent literacy, explored in earlier parts of the miniseries.
Her daughter struggled with reading due to dyslexia, which led Jeannie to pursue structured literacy training and shift her teaching approach.
She advises teachers to be persistent, personalize literacy issues for leaders, and use data to depersonalize challenges and focus on system improvements.
Many leaders do not see themselves as literacy or instructional leaders, lacking training in effective instruction and data systems.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.