Senator-elect Adam Hamilton's decisive win in Kansas marks a turning point in American politics, rooted not in political ambition but in a deep moral conviction to address systemic injustices. He recounts how personal experiences—such as the killing of activist Renee Goode and the fear of ICE enforcement—sparked his decision to run, driven by a commitment to love one’s neighbor as a core value. This faith-based motivation is central to his campaign, particularly in advocating for immigrant rights, economic justice, and humane immigration policies. Hamilton emphasizes the importance of listening to opponents’ fears, building trust, and fostering dialogue to bridge divides, drawing on religious teachings like the parable of the Good Samaritan. His victory reflects a broader democratic trend where voters are responding to urgent issues like affordability, corruption, and inequality. Meanwhile, the massive wins of Democratic candidates in key swing states—like Roy Cooper, John Ossoff, and Josh Shapiro—demonstrate the power of strong, values-driven campaigns and localized leadership. These outcomes suggest that political success is increasingly tied to authenticity, empathy, and effective communication. Hamilton’s journey from a lifelong pastor to a senator embodies a vision of leadership rooted in moral clarity and service, not partisan gain. As he enters the Senate, he commits to continuing the work of “knocking holes in the darkness,” using faith and empathy to guide policy and unite a divided nation.
Hello and welcome to the Bulwark Daily. I'm your host, Tim Miller. We have a super fun
doubleheader for you today, so buckle up. In segment two, it's my buddy Rob Flaherty,
who is Deputy Campaign Manager for Kamala Harris. He wrote an autopsy of that campaign
for us at the Bulwark in the spring, and so I wanted to give him the opportunity to
do a victory topsy and come on and we could just go through all of the data and all of
the strategies that led to this massive democratic tsunami. That's coming up in segment two.
Stick around. But up first, I had him on the morning after his primary victory in the Kansas
Senate race earlier this year and was dying to have him back as soon as possible after
the mass.
Massive, massive victory in Kansas that we saw on Tuesday. Delighted to welcome back
to the show, not just Reverend Adam Hamilton, but Senator-elect Adam Hamilton. How's that
feel?
You know, it doesn't seem real yet, actually. My wife and I look at each other like, did
this just happen? Are we actually doing this? It's very exciting, obviously, and we feel
a tremendous sense of responsibility and feel humbled that the people of Kansas chose us.
But the main thing I feel is like, okay, we've done this.
Now we better make some real difference. You know, we've got to, we've got to make sure
that when we get up there, it's, I mean, I'm not doing it for my health. I want to make
sure that we are actually working to bring positive change. And I know I'm a junior
senator from Kansas, but I'm going to do everything I can to try to positively impact our country.
Take us in there on election night, though, and you're seeing the returns come in. What
was coming over you?
Well, you know, you, you, at least I go in, went into it like, okay, I'm going to lose.
I need to be prepared for that. But in my head, I, you know, I knew the numbers and I knew what
the polls would look like the last few days. And I knew our team felt like, okay, we really
have a good chance to win tonight. You know, we had a room with my kids and my granddaughter and,
you know, other family and close friends and the watch party was downstairs. I wanted to go hang
out with them, but they wouldn't let me, you know, you got to stay up here in this room until
they announced. So it was really exciting. We kept getting notices. Well, they're about to
announce, they're about to announce that, you know, that was like an hour and a half before
they finally did. And so like, well, we waited 94 years for a Democrat to be elected to Kansas.
What's another hour or two, but it was very exciting. It was, uh, and I, you know, it's
fun for my kids, uh, watching them, you know, because this is something so historic and, uh,
none of us thought this is where we would be, you know, this year, a year ago, I didn't plan
on doing this. So, well, let's go back to that. I want to go back to the origin story. Cause we
had you on the morning after you won the primary, you're a little tired, um, but eloquent. And,
uh, you said, you said this to me and discussing why you decided to get out. I said, I have these
arguments with Roger Marshall. I'm in the shower. He wasn't in the shower with me, but I'm having
these arguments with him. And I'm like, dude, I'm like, dude, you have got to speak up and do
something. And I think that's so interesting about your origin story, right? Like this was not a
recruitment from DC. I tell us a little bit more about that. This was really just you feeling like
you had to do it. Yeah. It was funny. You know, my opponent kept saying, you know, Chuck Schumer,
you know, recruited him or whatever. I'm like,
I had never talked to Chuck Schumer and not until, you know, we were finally won the primary.
It was like, uh, I just had a deep sense of conviction that what was happening in our
country was not right. That there were people being hurt, that there were decisions being made
that were inconsistent with our values as a country. And certainly inconsistent with what
I preached. There were people in Washington who claimed Christian faith, but I couldn't figure
out which gospels they were reading from. Cause it wasn't Matthew, Mark, Luke, or John. And,
you know, it seems like almost weekly, sometimes nightly, there'd be one more thing that would
happen.
You know, recently, just in the last month, I mean, this is, you know, every week, what a month
ago, we were going to televise live the execution of a, of a person. I think there's only two other
countries in the world that do that. And we don't want to join their company or it was watching,
you know, the president belittle and berate a Reuters journalist who's standing there asking
him a legitimate question. Why did you cancel your trip to Kansas? And then of course he
rescheduled it. But I just thought this is, this is crazy. This is just not who we are as Americans.
But those were just two tiny examples. There are just so many bigger examples.
Of how decisions made in Washington were hurting people in my state and people across the country
and jeopardizing our international relations and, and changing how people looked at America. And
it just was like, this is not who we are. Something's got to change. So I felt that
there's a passage in the book of Jeremiah, the prophet who's, he talks about, he had a fire
pent up in his bones. And that's what it felt like to me. It was like, I couldn't shake this
feeling over the course of the last year and a half. Like, okay, you got to speak up. You got
to speak up. You know, my wife was a hard no to begin with. And she was like, no way, you know,
you've sacrificed too much. We've sacrificed too much for you to do what you've done at the church
these last 36 years. I'm not going to do that again for something else. Now, not like this,
even though she strongly believed things were broken. Right. And then, uh, and then it was
January of this, of this year where she turned to me one day after I preached a funeral on Saturday
morning, she just said, I think I was wrong. I think things are so broken and you might be the,
the strange enough kind of candidate. You could actually get elected. And I think, I think we need
to try. Well, January this year was when Renee Goode was martyred. So it had to have been around.
Yeah, that was, yeah, it was all around that same time. And, uh, you know, protests and,
you know, having to warn my congregation, if you go to a protest, please don't take a gun with you.
But even then my struggle was, so I love God first in my life. That may sound trite,
but it's really what my aim is to love God first and to love my neighbor. But the first neighbor
I love is my wife and my children and my granddaughter. After that,
is I love this church that I pastor. I love these people. And the thought of
stepping aside from that or doing anything that would jeopardize their, you know,
cause we're a church divided roughly equally Republicans, Democrats, and independents. And,
and I've devoted 36 years to caring for them and loving them. And so, you know, I, I was,
every time I think about, you know, stepping aside from leading them full time right now and,
you know, stepping into politics, which could jeopardize, you know, some of their deciding to
be a part of the church, I'd find myself in tears. And at the same time, I just couldn't shake the
thought that something has to happen.
I'm just taking us back to January and it was the scale of the problems that we faced. I, you know,
I mean, like if you really are in this moment where, you know, a woman who is trying to care
for her neighbors, you're talking about love thy neighbor. And that's what Renee Good was trying to
do. And, you know, she gets gunned down in the street. It's like something has to change.
I mean, you see this, this should not be happening in our country and people who were trying to care
for their neighbors, you know, people who were concerned about their neighbors at just again and
again.
It was so crazy. I was in Texas. I was nervous. I didn't want to jinx you. I thought about coming
to Kansas for your party, but I didn't want to jinx you. I felt better about
Tallarico's chances. I felt it was less likely I was going to jinx him. So I went to Austin and I
got to talk to him for a second afterwards. On the podium of his victory speech, it said,
love thy neighbor. That was the message that he had on there. I guess I have two
thoughts about that for you. Like on the one hand, this is pretty crazy to have like two
Democrats now coming in, like kind of offering this fresh view of Christianity and what that
means to you. But then in particular about these immigrant neighbors and the way they've been
treated, I'm kind of wondering how you think about that and your obligation to them as you go in next
year. Yeah, I think a lot about that. This is an issue that's really, really matters to me. I've
included it in sermons multiple times over the last 10 years and in particular this last year.
So I was in Southwest Kansas. Southwest Kansas is the meatpacking industry.
Kansas produces, we're the number two producer of packaged meat across the country.
And so the meatpacking industry, the livestock industry, the dairy industry, these are all
in West and Southwest Kansas. And in some of the towns out there, you know, a majority of the
population are Hispanic. So when ICE was out there just a few weeks ago and, you know, there were
parents who were afraid to go pick up their children at school after school because they
were afraid they'd be arrested. And so there were children who waited there after school,
you know, for, I don't know how long, hours, I think. I mean, people were there. Teachers were
there with them. I was out there. I was in Dodge City twice. I was a liberal twice. And to hear
this is not right. There were nine Republican state legislators who sent a letter to the
president saying this is not okay. And, you know, they were concerned about it both from a workforce
perspective in terms of what's happening. People don't show up at work at the meatpacking. You know,
there's 150 rail cars coming in every day with cattle with nowhere for them to go because people
are afraid to show up at work. And, you know, a lot of the people at Western Kansas who are ag
people, these are people who voted for President Trump three times. But they were, you know,
talking to one guy and he was describing how, I don't know, it was a tornado or a very heavy winds
that came through and destroyed some of their rotating sprinkler systems that are out there in
the fields. And he described first, you know, how expensive these things had gotten now because of
the terrorists. But then he said, but, you know, the people who show up the day of to try to help
me get, you know, get these things back online, they were all Hispanics. Many of them, you know,
they were immigrants who'd come here. You know, I didn't ask to see their papers. They showed up
and they showed up and they worked all day and late into the night because they knew that my
crops would die if they weren't there trying to keep the sprinkler systems going. And there were six
of them that were out. And he said, the thought that these people have to be afraid that somebody's
going to come and arrest them when they've done, you know, they've done everything they can to help
me. He said, it's just not right. Again, this is a, you know, lifelong Republican is saying we don't
treat people this way. And so when I was out there, the citizens, you know, Hispanic citizens who were
children of parents who had migrated here were like, we are doing everything we can to get people
registered. We want them to vote for you. We know you're going to speak up for us and you care about
what we genuinely do. And it's interesting. I think we won two or three counties out there.
Yeah. And one of those counties flipped by, I think it was 56 points from what Donald Trump
got two years ago to what I got in this race, 56 points. And part of that was making sure people
were registered to vote. But part of it was people saying, we don't want our country hurting us or
our parents or our siblings or our children or our family members. And there's so many things to do
and so many obligations next year. But I wonder what you think about the obligation is to the
people that are already suffering at the hands of ICE. And as I said, I was in Texas. There are
people in detention centers right now in Texas that are separated from their families that have
legal citizen children who are in schools that they can't go pick up because they're being
detained indefinitely in Dilley. What do you think is the obligation to those folks that are in the
detention centers right now? We have a lot of work to do when it comes to immigration, immigration
reform policies. I support ICE doing what they were created to do after 9-11. So ICE was created,
I think it was created.
Shortly after 9-11. It was created to make sure that-
The Department of Homeland Security was created after 9-11. Like before that, it was INS.
Right, right. And they were created to make sure that dangerous people weren't training to fly
airplanes into buildings. They weren't threatening to hurt American citizens across the country. I
mean, we were all anxious about what was happening. And I support that. Like, I think that's good. I'm
grateful. I want them to do that. It's just that we have, we fund ICE at a level that's more than,
I think, all other federal law enforcement combined now,
something like $70 billion between ICE and border control. They have been militarized and politicized
and many times not properly trained to be able to do what the kinds of things they're doing because
there was this, you know, effort to set quotas of the number of people who'd be arrested. This is
not how this should work. And so, yes, these are things that we need to be focused, you know,
we need to be working on along with a lot of other things. But this is one that's important.
And the detention centers itself, I'm sorry, I'm pretty just focused on right now because
there are people in the detention centers right now that have been left there.
And, you know, I think that there's a long-term funding fight. And I'm with you. And obviously,
you should still have border security funding. This is not about eliminating it. But what about,
you know, there have been people these last two years that right now we're being detained.
Yeah, that's what I sort of say is I get emails all the time from people who have family members
or friends or other people have been detained. And the process, it seems as though there's nobody
who can help. So they reached out to me because we checked with our congressperson, we checked with
our senator, and nobody seems to be doing anything about this. You know, there's always a story. It's
a particular person. And I think that's what I'm trying to do. You know, this and, and so yeah, my heart breaks for those. And, and I'll tell you,
so in my victory speech, if you get a chance to ever listen to it, it was built around the
I watched it. You don't think I watched it at 4.30? You don't think I watched it at 4.30 a.m. in my hotel room? I did.
Exactly. Well, you know, my focus in that was on the parable of the Good Samaritan.
And this idea, you know, I've talked about love your neighbor all the way through. I had my love
your neighbor pin on, you know, this is my, this is really important to me. And I'm glad it's
a lot of other people. But
by the way, that's not necessarily this. It doesn't matter whether you're a person of faith
or not. That is an idea that matters. You know, I had a guy come up to me and he said, I think I
shared this with you. And I think it was Holton, Kansas, who said, I'm a one issue voter. And my
one issue is I will not vote for anybody who doesn't believe we should love our neighbors.
We love ourselves. And so I think that's a, that's just a, that's just a human thing.
And it just happens to be in Moses and in Jesus, Leviticus and in the gospels. But,
but anyway, when Jesus says, somebody says, ask Jesus, I know you remember this parable, but
somebody asked Jesus once, a religious lawyer, you know, what do I have to do to inherit eternal
life? And he says, well, what do you think? You're a smart guy. What do you think? And he says, well,
we should love God with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength. Our heart, soul, strength,
and mind is how he says it there. And we should love our neighbors. We love ourselves. And Jesus
says, do this and you'll live. And he says, oh, but wait, I have one more question, Jesus.
Who is my neighbor? And, uh, I think it was Dr. King who said, you know, the question he was
really asking is who don't I have to love? And, uh, so I know president, he wanted the
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Right, right, right. And so, um, who don't I have to love? And then Jesus tells
the parable of the good Samaritan. And, you know, remember the story, there's a guy who's going from
Jerusalem to Jericho. I've taken that road probably a dozen times in the Holy land,
going to Jerusalem, Jerusalem to Jericho. He is beaten, robbed, and left for dead on the side of
the road. And then you've got two religious leaders, one, the Levite and the priest come by,
they see him on the side of the road. They go to the other side of the road. This is all part of
my victory speech. They go to the other side of the road and they ignore him. They pretend not
to see him. You know, they,
leave him, leave him there. And then along comes the Samaritan and the Samaritan is the other. He's
the person you don't like. He's the person in this story who is not expected to be the hero.
And he stops and he bandages his wounds, close him with his own cloak, puts him on his donkey,
takes him to Jericho, provides for his continuing healthcare and food and lodging. And, uh, Jesus
says, you know, which one was the neighbor? And of course, you know, it was the Samaritan.
And I, you know, I reminded people of Jesus. We're telling that story today in a room filled
with Democrats. He'd say it was the good, it was the paralytic Republican. And if it was the,
you know if it was a room filled with republicans be the parable of a good democrat good liberal
good conservative whoever's the other to you yeah but i said there's three characters in the story
there is uh there's they're the people who robbed the man and so part of what we ask is who today
is hurting other people who today is stealing from them taking from them harming people who's
doing the harm today and and then we've got the two religious leaders and these two religious
leaders what's the answer to that question who's doing the harm today well i think we could find a
lot of people like that are doing that including sometimes billionaires who are you know who are
taking advantage of people it's it's uh looking to see how are we cutting benefits from people
uh health insurance snap benefits and other things it's people who are choosing to create quotas
for a number of people we're arresting but it's also in our daily lives it could be in our daily
lives and who we and how we harm other people but then you get the two religious people and they
pretend not to see the guy and just remind you you know dr king preaches this uh text on the last
night of his life he's
he's assassinated the next day he's in memphis tennessee and he's speaking up for the sanitation
workers two of whom had died because of faulty equipment and so he's there even though he's sick
and he is has been threatened you know people threaten to kill him if he comes there but he
still shows up and he's preaching from this text and i love the question he asked he said you know
so those two religious leaders maybe they were afraid there were still
thieves around maybe they thought it was a setup and so the question they were asking
was what's going to happen to us if we stop and help this guy but the samaritan comes along
and he asks a different question what's going to happen to him if i don't stop and help and i just
said you know we got to decide which characters we are in this are we the people who are taking
advantage of people hurting people most of us are not those people but are we the people who make
up excuses and are in our fear don't stop and actually help the person who's in need are we
the people ask the question what's going to happen to this guy if we don't stop and help
and i think you know at our heart in america at our best we're the person you know we're the
people who stop and say how how do we help but when we eliminated snap you know the
benefits for thousands of people millions of people across america hundreds of thousands i
don't know the exact number i know in kansas it's about 20 000 for children alone or when we decided
that we were going to get rid of usaid we were going to gut the you know the organization when
they're helping the poorest the poor with a tiny little fraction of our budget you know we decided
we were going to cut you know a trillion dollars from medicaid over a 10-year period of time
you know we decided we didn't really see those people when we think about the people who are
who are warehoused in places who've been arrested you know under these quota systems
and we don't say anything we don't do anything
we've decided you know we're going to be those people who we think we're good people
but we don't say anything and that's that's part of how i got in this race i just felt like
somebody's got to do something and if i have the best chance of winning
then i'm willing to do that you know and it's not it's not heroic it's just like this is just what
we all should do what do your part whatever your part is all right guys during this election week
i haven't really been eating very much i've missed some meals i've had some cigarettes don't tell my
you know that's led to a little bit of weight loss but that's not really sustainable you know
not eating and smoking it's not really a sustainable solution for your health so so
one thing that you can turn to if you're trying to lose a little weight get to your goal weight
is our friends at hymns weight loss by hymns offers access to a range of fda approved glp1 medications
including the wagovi pill and the wagovi pen with wagovi you can lose up to 20 of your body weight
people lost an average of 14 body weight at 64 weeks in a clinical trial of wagovi alongside
diet and exercise you get an online consultation with a licensed provider plus nutrition and
lifestyle guidance and 24 access to your care team that's what confidence looks like not
guessing taking control with a plan they built for you be prepared be strong be confident be him
ready to be him visit hymns.com slash the bulwark to get personalized affordable care
for weight loss hair loss sex testosterone and more that's hyms.com slash the bulwark
hymns.com slash the bulwark individual results may vary and stopping treatment may result in
weight regain weight loss by hymns is not available in all 50 states wagovi is a registered trademark
of novo nordisk as to get started and learn more including important safety information
wagovi clinical study information and restrictions visit hymns.com i didn't just watch your victory
speech i've watched some of your old sermons um last oh yeah this morning oh yeah including you
had an issues that divide series yeah it was interesting i can watch one i think it was in
2016 and you're discussing about like what people think is the biggest threats to the country and you
how you see you know at that time kind of the division as more of a threat than some of these
external threats that face the country it's now a decade later and you're about to be in the senate
and have to deal with that divide i'm just kind of wondering like how you think about that today
and how you think about balancing you know the want to unite the country with moral clarity
on issues where there are real divides so i think part of what you have to be able to do and i've
is to listen to people and understand why they feel so strongly their particular views.
This is Republicans and Democrats or liberals and conservatives. And as you listen, you go, oh, I see what's going on in your mind. I see the assumptions you have or the fears that you have. And a lot of times our decision making process is built around fear. And politicians are masters at making us fear other people.
That's a you know, that's a big part of all the political rhetoric. It's the advertisements, the 43 billion that was spent in this election or whatever that number was, is making people afraid.
You know, this is what's going to happen if the Democrats get control or this is what's going to happen if that Republican is in charge, you know, is in charge.
So so once you begin to understand people's fears and you actually listen and you show that you're not just trying to get a gotcha moment, but you're actually you care and you're listening.
That opens the door to be able to have conversations. And I found those conversations take time.
So if I've got somebody who's got a, you know, a strongly a strong position on on immigration, it's not mine.
And they're really afraid of the rapist and the murders that Donald Trump talks about.
And and they can point to an example. Here's a story and here's a story. And that's what's that's what's going through their mind.
You know, it's going to take a while to have a change that happens there.
But it never happens if I just belittle them, look down on them or dismiss them.
It does happen if I can begin to hear their concerns, share with them other concerns and we can begin to develop a relationship.
And, and what I've had, what what's been a great joy for me in our church is watching people's views change over a long period of time.
So my first book I ever wrote was called Confronting the Controversies.
It was a sermon series I preached in 2000 on the most controversial issues.
And I found if I could understand why somebody held the view they did about the death penalty or about abortion or euthanasia or whatever it might be.
If I understood them and I could articulate, you know, their fears, and then I could come in and offer a different bandit.
You know, different viewpoint, but I did it with respect and with kindness.
Oftentimes, people change their minds and entering the word repent in the New Testament, it's a Greek word metanoia, and it means to change your mind.
And then when you change your mind, you change your heart, and then when you change your heart, you change your behavior.
And oftentimes, when we try to argue with people about a particular view, we just argue past each other, we can't actually hear each other, we get angry, the angry, you know, we get more and more angry when we're hearing somebody say something we think is just totally stupid or immoral.
If we can figure out how to actually listen and hear where they're coming from and what their fears are, build a relationship, we can find things can change.
And that's part of what I'm committed to in the Senate is, how do I begin to build relationships with people on the other side?
Easier said than done.
I was talking to our mutual friend, Guy Cecil, and I said, what should I ask Adam about today?
And he was like, a lot of people have gone to the Senate saying that, that they wanted to bridge divides.
It is a little easier said than done.
You know, this means you're gonna have to, I don't know, it was the old Obama line about Mitch McConnell.
It's like, you have a choice.
You have a drink with Mitch McConnell.
You have a drink with Ted Cruz, Adam Hamilton.
You want to go off to sit down with Ted Cruz and bridge the divides?
Why do you think you can succeed at that where others have not?
Because I've done it for 38 years.
I've done it for 38 years.
I've managed to, not always, we've lost, you know, church members over time.
But there's a lot of them that when we sat down together, you know, we walked away and we hugged and we like, it's not about hugging and polyanalysts and kumbaya to each other.
It's about how do you actually change somebody's mind?
I think I may have mentioned this last time.
I'm not sure, but I learned something a long time ago when it comes to what's sometimes called prophetic preaching.
Preaching about hard issues is, you know, the kind of speaking truth to power or whatever.
And there are prophets and they go into town, they blow into town, they say the hard thing and then they leave.
But when you're a pastor who's trying to be prophetic, what you're trying to do is figure out how do I, and this is the question I say,
I got to ask myself, is my goal here in this sermon or this relationship or whatever merely to irritate someone or is it to influence them?
It's super easy.
It takes no skill.
Just poke them in the eye.
Say your thing.
I'm good at that.
I got that down.
We need irritators.
We need people who do that.
But we also need people who are able to have a conversation with somebody in a way that they feel heard and respected.
And because of that are willing to, you actually do this, Tim, you're so good at this, but that where they feel like you, you actually cared about them.
And that opens the door.
And I think about, you know, again, I think about Ted Kennedy and I don't know if it's Orrin Hatcher.
I don't know who it was after he died and after Kennedy died.
And he said, I really love this man.
Something to the effect of, I really love this man.
And he got me to, you know, we worked together to get some things done.
And somebody said, well, why did you love him so much?
I thought this was so great.
He said, because when my wife was sick, he came to the hospital to see her.
Yeah.
Like, you know, there's something happens when you, when you can build a relationship and then you begin.
And look, I'm not saying this is everybody's cup of tea.
I'm not saying everybody should do this, but I'm saying as a pastor, this is part of what I bring to the table.
And I've watched people change their minds, radically change their minds.
I think about LGBTQ inclusion in our congregation and in the United Methodist Church, you know, starting in 1972, we had language that was harmful to people.
And, you know, I was just a kid.
I was just eight years old when they put that language in there, trying to find some way to hold people together.
But when I began preaching about this, you know, I started with preaching where I was at and that was just, we're going to love everybody.
But I, you know, but we may, you know, this is what I think the Bible says.
And over time, my views of the Bible began to change in terms of how I.
I read those six passages of scripture that speak directly to this.
But when I, when I finally, my views changed, I started preaching to people.
I had to understand where other people were and they were where I was 10 years before.
So how did I speak to them where I was 10 years before?
And it was fun.
I had this woman come up to me, gosh, probably 10 years ago.
And she said, you know, when I started coming to this church, I was very conservative on same-sex marriage.
And, you know, you preach several sermons and I'm like, at first I was mad, you know, that you preach that sermon, but you did it so gently and so respectfully that I.
I actually had to listen.
I didn't leave the church because of it.
And she said, you know, over a period of five or six years, my views changed.
And today, you know, I'm somebody who's a champion for people, same-sex marriage, people being able to have, you know, all the civil rights that everybody has.
But she said, it wouldn't happen were not for the way you preached, you know, the way you talked to me when I was at a different place and the way you.
So I think that's, you know, I'm going to get the D.C. and I'm going to figure out is does that work?
Maybe it doesn't work in the Senate.
I love that story.
Obviously, I know a lot of people have been on that journey in my life.
That woman's ears were open, though.
You're going to talk to some people in D.C. whose ears might not be.
The vice president of the United States and the president of the Senate.
He just like a week or two ago said that you're a guy who uses your pulpit not to lift people up.
You use it not to serve the Lord or to serve your congregants.
He said that he admits that he makes up lies about people if it helps him politically.
Yeah.
How do you deal with that?
OK, so first of all, you know, so I've heard these things and I listen to the president.
He spoke in Salina and Wichita and he talked about me to both these both these men.
Here's what I think.
First of all, at 62, I listen to that.
I just roll my eyes.
I'm like, give me a break.
You know, anybody who knows me knows that that's not who I am.
And I know you know that, too.
But then I, you know, I pray the Lord's Prayer every day.
And one part of it is forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.
And then I remember Jesus saying, blessed are you when people say all manner of evil against you.
And I'm like, OK, all right.
And, you know, it's funny.
It's again, at 62, it's different than when I was 40.
At 62, it's just easier for that to roll off your back and to roll your eyes.
But I think in a campaign, people say whatever they think they need to say to get their person elected.
It's sad and pathetic.
It should not happen.
But that's what happens.
So I would just say my hope is to have a conversation with J.D. Vance, you know, and we'll I'm sure we will have conversations.
I hope we have a chance to talk about faith, theology.
He clearly has never listened to my sermons.
He hasn't.
He has no idea what I've done or who I am.
He's just saying whatever he was just saying, whatever he needed to say to try to support Roger Marshall getting reelected.
But, you know, I, I don't have any animosity towards him.
I'm like, let's have a conversation.
I'd love to talk with you, but I won't kowtow to him.
That's for sure.
You know, you'll have at least one conversation with him because he's going to have to swear you in on a Bible.
Exactly.
Exactly.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I'm hoping it's not going to be the Trump Bible.
I get to pick my Bible.
OK, I'm going to bring it.
But yeah, I mean, he's he's had a couple of conversions.
Maybe you can win him over.
You know, maybe changing.
You know, I really do think part of part of what has to happen.
Ted Cruz is the same way.
You know, he said some things about my theology.
I'm like, dude, are you kidding me?
Let's talk theology.
We'll have a we'll have a debate about that if you want to.
But but really, I think it starts with having a conversation and trying to get to know people and then trying to say, OK, once you build trust, then how do we work together?
To try to find some common ground and then try to, you know, try to create real solutions.
Let's talk about these things that are painful or hurting people.
This is my only disappointment about your win was that if you'd lost, I was going to send you an email and invite you to do a religion podcast with me.
But I don't think you're going to have time for that, unfortunately.
I'm not going to be able to debate that.
They didn't work that much this year.
So maybe in August or something, we can have an August series.
Maybe so.
I really would love to do that.
It'd be a lot of fun.
And, you know, the thing that matters most to me in my life is my faith.
Yeah.
But and it's out of that faith that, you know, my values, my my sense of ethics and what's right and wrong come.
And, you know, you've heard me say this before.
I get on my knees every morning.
I'm just like, OK, God, thanks for today.
Thanks for my life.
Thanks for the great privilege.
I mean, I was weeping the other day thinking about how in the heck did I get to this place where I get to do it?
The hotel room at the Marriott, you know, like, thank you that I get to do this.
And but also, please help me to do it well.
Help me to love people.
Help me to reflect, you know, what your will is.
In terms of how we treat each other and what we do.
And so talking about winning people over.
The other thing I needed an update on from our last conversation is did you win your dad over?
You know, there was a lot of swing voters in Kansas.
Yeah.
He doesn't live in Kansas.
He lives in Washington.
Yeah. And I love my dad. He called me yesterday to say, Hey, you know, good job. You, you got
elected, you know, your team's in control now. I hope you guys can do some good stuff. And
it meant a lot to me actually, that he called because, you know, you need, you need that.
I want to end with this. I watched one other video of yours this morning. It was in 2013.
You spoke at the national prayer service at Barack Obama's inauguration at the national
cathedral. And you ended that with a piece of advice for him that I think we can now turn back
to you. So I want to play your advice to you. Okay. Stevenson, the 19th century author once
told how as a boy, he'd been sitting in front of the window at nightfall, watching the lamplighter
light the gas street lamps. He would erect a ladder at one post and he would climb up and he
would light the lamp with a torch and then he'd take it down and go to the next one and the next
one and the next one. And, and his father walked in the room and
he said, son, what are you looking at at the window? What do you see out there? That's so
fascinating. And the young Stevenson said, daddy, I'm watching that man out there
knock holes in the darkness. There's a lot of darkness in our world.
Lead us to be a compassionate people, to be concerned for the marginalized,
help us rediscover a vision for America that is so compelling that it unites us,
and calls us to realize the full potential of this country, to be a shining city upon a hill.
And when you feel your lowest, don't give up. Wait upon the Lord. He will renew your strength
that you might lead us as a nation to knock holes in the darkness.
Probably more relevant now than it was in 2013.
Well, it certainly feels more relevant to me personally right now. Although I will tell you,
I preach this to my congregation all the time. We talk about knocking holes in the darkness,
and I'll do it again. I'm going to be preaching through the season of Advent,
coming up the Sunday after Thanksgiving. And that entire series is going to be about light
and darkness. And that's what I'm going to call them to do. And on Candlelight Christmas Eve, we
have last year, about 140,000 people who joined us for worship on TV, online. And, you know,
in person, we have them get their candles out. We turn off all the lights and we're like, okay,
this is what the mission is from Jesus. Let's go punch holes in the darkness. Let's go knock
holes in the darkness. And that's what I intend to do in Washington, DC to the best of my ability,
God willing, and with God's help.
All right. I'm wishing you the best. I'm really proud of you and happy for you and happy for the
country. There's a lot of darkness there. I've spent more time over there. You've done more
preaching. And let me tell you, it's going to be a little harder than you think, but we'll get an
update on it next year. All right. Hey, Tim, I really appreciate you. I appreciate your heart
and who you are and what you're trying to do, your role that you're playing and trying to knock
holes in the darkness. So thank you for doing that. Thank you. Sounder of Light, Adam Hamilton.
Appreciate you very much. I'm next, my friend, Rob Flaherty.
All right. I'm at that time of life where the Democrats elected like three senators who are
younger than me. So, you know, I got to start thinking about what the future holds and making
sure we're prepared to make sure that if something happens, you know, my daughter, my loved ones are
taken care of. And one way to do that is to go to Trust and Will. Trust and Will offers affordable
attorney designed estate plans that will help you get a job. So if you're looking for a job,
you can go to Trust and Will. Trust and Will offers affordable attorney designed estate plans online
that you can create in minutes. It has a super easy to use website. It's fast and minutes. You
can create a will that lets you document your wishes for guardians, asset distribution and
healthcare planning. If you need expert input, attorney support is available as an add on to
your plan. You can easily update your plan at every life stage or transition. You can share
access with trusted contacts to ensure your will is carried out. And it is secure, which is important
bank level encryption and secure sharing features. So your most important documents and details stay
both protected and accessible. I've mentioned this, I think every time this comes up. I don't
like doing paperwork. I don't like doing expenses. I don't, you know, life's too short. I don't like
ironing. Life's too short for ironing. So if you're going to do a Trust and Will, you need a
product that makes it as easy as possible. And if I can do it in just a little bit of time, trust me,
you can too. Trust and Will, affordable estate plans, priceless peace of mind. Go to trustandwill.com
slash bulwark and get 20% off. That's trustandwill.com slash bulwark to get your 20% off.
Trustandwill.com slash bulwark. And we're back. He's the co-host of the podcast. Nobody knows
anything. He knows a little bit though. He was deputy campaign manager of Kamala Harris's
presidential campaign director of digital strategy in the Biden White House. It's Rob Flaherty. What's
up, homie? Hey, Tim, how we doing, dude? I couldn't be better. Yeah. I've had a couple of
people texting me over the last 12 hours, like complaining about this or that annoyed about this.
And I was like, you, nobody can bring me down. Yeah. We're living on a cloud. Nobody can bring
me down. I mean, the only thing I, and literally nobody can bring me down. I'm like running into
the Cialis commercial warnings where I'd have to go to Ochsner down the street here in a little
bit. It's been three days, Tim. I'm just waiting. All right. After the, famously after the 2024
election that, uh, your candidate lost, uh, nobody wrote an autopsy.
There was a partial autopsy. There's a lot of drama about it. We don't want to relive all that.
You wrote for us though, for the bulwark, what ended up being kind of the most comprehensive
autopsy out there since nobody else would do it, which we really appreciate.
You can trip over a low bar. Yeah. And so, you know, I, that was kind of a,
that's kind of a downer of a project that you had to take on for us. And so I decided that I
wanted to have you back today to give the life topsy, the life, the life topsy. What happened?
How did this happen?
Well, um, Democrats are now enormously popular. Everyone loves us and, uh, it's,
it's all over. Um, we're in charge forever. Uh, no, look, I think there's like, there are
the things that, that we got right. And then there are the things that are like features of
just like a midterm election. Right. And, and in that category, it's like the people who show up
in the midterm elections are like more likely to be civically engaged and like care about the
project of democracy. And so that is a good thing in the short term still has some concerning
things for the longterm, but who cares? We'll take it. Um, but then the things that Democrats
got right is like, we talked about the issues people gave a shit about. This is an anti-status
quo election. We talked about affordability. We talked about, uh, corruption. We talked about
the things people hate about the system. And I think that a lot of people dialed in on a really
smart sort of mix of like kind of an economic populist message with sort of a pragmatist
ethos. Um, and we had a bunch of compelling candidates everywhere. Uh, and that leads to,
that leads to good outcomes. And so I think a little bit of it is, you know, we were,
we were beneficiaries of a good environment and a little bit of it is like, you know,
they, they got a lot of things, right. They communicated better.
All right. That's kind of like the big picture stuff. This lets like nerd out for a second. I
mean, your background is in digital and, and, um, et cetera. Like what about some of the tech
tactical? I mean, there's a lot of kind of conversation about the ways in which
Trump and MAGA were like talking to people, um, in more kind of modern ways, more up-to-date ways
about how, where, about where people are getting information. They were reaching people,
people that Democrats weren't even like speaking to. Like, was there a change in that this cycle,
do you think? Or was it just like the type of electorate change really more?
Look, I think there was a change. You know, you saw a lot of people who were good at communicating.
Like the thing that I think was my worry coming out of 24 was that people were going to overlearn
that like, yup, you just got to do the TikTok dance and you're going to be fine. Right. And,
or go on all the podcasts and you'll be fine. And that only works if you have something to say.
And if you're doing it in a way that like resonates with you or like,
rhymes with like who you are. And so there were tons of candidates who did an incredible job with
that. Right. Like Asaf is a great example of like, he wasn't doing the like TikTok dances. He was
doing these like big speeches that were like beautifully composed that worked for him.
Tallarico had an incredible social media operation that featured a lot of smart people from his
campaign and some folks who were on the Harris campaign too. They did an amazing job. And then
you look at like Scott Cologne, who looks like he's going to be a Senator in terms of like a
content driven communications operation. I mean, that guy, you have to
hold him up as a model. It was perfectly on his brand. It felt fun. It felt like he was having a
good time, felt like he wanted to be part of it. He went everywhere and he had something to say when
he went there. And so like, I think you, you saw people getting a lot better at this. And I do
think, you know, materially the sort of outside game of building a communications infrastructure
to like reach more people and reach different people like that definitely came into play too.
Yeah. I was on Nicole Wallace's podcast, The Best People. And we were kind of talking about this,
on the inverse of that, about what you're saying about, you know, to, to win the algorithms,
you have to have something compelling for the algorithms, the nature of how Trump communicates
and acts like the fact that he's insane. And he says crazy stuff all the time that like,
that allows him to dominate the narrative, like really was a superpower in different,
you know, races versus, you know, the race you're running with Harris, for example.
Yeah. And some of that stuff was tearing down what the Biden administration was doing. Some
of that stuff was like, you know, whatever, tearing people down, trans people are going back to COVID,
you know, talking about the Wu flu or the shiny virus, like all that sort of stuff, right? Like,
that's how you got into people's feeds. And then like, you fast forward to this year, and it's like,
okay, but, but they're in charge and people's lives are going badly. And it's like, you know,
the John Husted's ass talk in the, you know, caulk discussion at the reflecting pool is like, fine,
it's in people's feeds, but that's not, it's not like landing with anybody like dominating the
world. It's like, okay, we're going to do this. We're going to do this. We're
candidate. He's going to blow the whole thing up. When you're the guy in charge and you're doing
that, it plays really, really differently. And it went from being a thing that showed that he
was an agent of change to being, he's sort of an agent of stasis in your life staying worse.
And so, yeah, like he had, he had fuck all to say. And so it, I think it worked counterproductively.
So reality matters, I guess, is the, is a little bit of how to sum up your, your take there.
You heard it here in the bulwark. I think that it's reality, but it's also
like your sense of values and like what you stand for matching with what people want. And at this
point, at this point, they're like, get fucked anyone who's elected. And by the way, I think
that is a thing that you saw in blue States, right? Where Democrats kind of underperformed
in places where Democrats were in charge. Right. And so, you know, I think that people are just
mad at, at everything. And we were able to take advantage of that. All right. I want to talk
about the.
Blowouts. We're here on Thursday of the show. This is, it's almost like these, a couple of
candidates were punished by doing so well that, uh, it's like, there's not even any room to talk
about them anymore because it got kind of boring. But, uh, last time I checked Georgia, Pennsylvania,
North Carolina were swing States. And actually I was looking at an analysis this morning of what
the tipping point States are in 2028. And it's those three, right? So you got to win all three
of them if you're a Democrat to become the president. And so, uh, it's probably worth
looking at the races. Roy Cooper,
wins 58 to 39 in the Senate race in North Carolina, John Ossoff, 59 to 40 in Georgia,
Josh Shapiro, 60 to 38 in Pennsylvania. Quick quiz. Did they do better or worse
than you guys did the Kamala Harris campaign in New York, Washington, and California?
Uh, listen, Tim, I think what's important is that we,
do you want to guess? Do you want to guess who they did?
I'm going to say, I'm going to say they did, uh, did better, better in New York and Washington
and worse than California, California, Kamala Harris in her home state, eat them out. She had
a 20 point victory. These guys, uh, Oh wait, I lied. Josh Shapiro did better in Pennsylvania,
California, but she did, she did beat out Ossoff and Cooper by a hair in her home state of
California. And that is insane. Yeah, it is. It is crazy. And it, look, it speaks to like good
candidates. It speaks to like good candidates. It speaks to
candidates who, um, like are just dominant in their state. And I think also like, like Roy Cooper
is like the God King of North Carolina. And the thing that comes from that is like, there's
national and local implications, right? The state legislative situation in, uh, uh, North Carolina
has been a fucking shit show for Democrats forever. Like we are like, I mean, we're talking about
flipping chambers. No one ever talked about flipping because he's so strong. And that means
sort of very expensive States and could put them elsewhere on the map because these candidates were
so good. It really is. Um, uh, it really is a testament to candidate quality. Um, uh, being
able to sort of beat the environment like that Shapiro, um, is just talking about the North
Carolina state house for a second. Cause it's, it's, I do think it's pretty, it's, it's super
important when you think of, I was, I've talked to Anderson Clayton like a couple of weeks before
the election, the party chair there in North Carolina, who's, she's just unbelievable. And
she's like, you know, she's like a positive vision, you know, Southern accent version of it. And, and,
and even in her like rose colored glasses, like positive, we can do this vision. It was like a
two cycle fix to like even get North Carolina back to where it could be because the state had been
gerrymandered so bad. And Roy Cooper wins by so much that it breaks the gerrymander. The Democrats
are like, Oh, I'm going to win. I'm going to win. And I'm like, Oh, I'm going to win. And I'm like,
I'm going to win. And I'm like,
I was doing kind of a nine to five Dolly thing on election night. And then it's like, wait a minute.
They might be Virginia Fox for 10 to four. And now it's like, they might be Greg Murphy for 11 to
three when all the votes are counting in. There might be 11 Democrats from North Carolina in the
house. The real world ramifications of this are that like whatever policy issue you care about at
a local level in North Carolina or the way that that impacts, you know, the congressional delegation,
like she was basically like, we can't even hope to fix it until 2029 because we got to win two
straight cycles to get the Supreme Court back. But now they can just fix it. They can just fix
stuff. Now. It's incredible. No, it's totally incredible. And I think I hope Anderson takes a
nice victory lap too, because I remember she gets elected to that role of party chair. I think she's
like, what? She was like 25. Yeah, I think she's 28 or 29. Now. She went to Appalachian State when
I interviewed her. I was like, so we I was like, so were you there for the Michigan the Appy State
went over Michigan and she was like, I'm not gonna try to do her accent. But she was like, Tim, I was
six. And I remember I remember people on the national stage being like, Oh, my God, it's an
important state. There's a 25 year old in charge. And look what happened, man. I mean, this is like
a total testament to like, young people can do great shit. Roy Cooper has like a read on that
state in a way that like very few political figures have credit needs to go to Schumer for
getting him to do it and taking it off the map. Because it's going to have huge national implications.
All right, now back to George.
with ossoff ossoff wins by 19 there were some concerns that he was not going to win by enough
to carry quiche lands bottoms in the governor's race across the line just you know coattails wise
she ends up winning by nine yeah not even close yeah total blowout i mean bigger victory than um
anybody i mean i don't know what what more is there to say about the ossoff campaign but
even the most bullish pro ossoff stands were kind of like floated to me he might win by 15
yeah he won by 19. i know i know man like what was impressive about ossoff and what i think is
translatable for future campaigns perhaps is he got really good at making novel arguments that like
were in line with what voters wanted to hear and so every time he said something he said
something new and interesting and that sort of helped break through but then they they
got the tactics right i mean they got the sort of method of distribution they got the advertising
right the way they did the camera angles like all that kind of stuff and they played to his
strengths right uh so it's it's a well-run campaign and a candidate who matched the moment
shapiro then wins by 22 yeah i was like yeah 19 that's pretty good and i'm gonna win by 22
in pennsylvania the win was so big when i was putting together this segment i just google
searched you know senate and governor results and they the in the google like breakdowns of
the races to watch for governor's races they don't even include them
it was like it was that big of a blowout like he didn't even make you know like there were other
states like you wouldn't i forget like i don't know north dakota or something was on there like
there are other going way closer states so anyway i don't you look at it i don't want to do too much
2028 punditry but um depending on how crazy everything goes i do think there's a little bit
of maybe this idea of josh shapiro as like the backup binky choice for a lot of democrats it's
like if i get really worried i'm gonna win by 22
that tucker carlson's gonna be the president maybe we should just go with the guy but that
won by 22 yeah i think it's totally possible i mean that's his argument right is he is he has
an iron grip over the most important state in the country for who gets to be president um it's a
compelling argument i think that you know he's gonna have some uh fire coming at him from the
left i think on the presidential but for sure it is it is a compelling argument and he's a compelling
i mean he like you know people make they make fun of the obama thing but if you've actually been in
a room with him watching the president he's gonna be the president of the united states
watching him speak i mean it is it is electric he's really good my other glaze of josh is that
you know he's he's conversational on my show like he can he can do all of them you know what i mean
like he can do the such we need to do the podcast speeches and which you know is is challenging i
mean now now this now finally after a bunch of wins where there are a bunch of people that can
do that like talarico and others and the democratic side like that's a longer list now for democrats
than it was last month yeah yeah yeah still there just weren't there still aren't a huge number of
people that are good at all the different communications venues what's funny too is um
they keep having him back like i think about how after 24 like everyone was sort of tripping over
themselves to go on pat mcafee yeah and very few people have and he's gone on like what two times
three times yeah they like having the conversation with him down to plexus plexus i didn't mention
this in your bio of losses um you have some wins too um but you also uh worked for betos
presidential campaign that is true people know um who are listeners of the show that i have
such a soft spot for beto and i love beto and i had a little bit of like when i was in texas
on tuesday this just kind of this feeling of like pride in him and happiness for him and also like
a little melancholy like kind of mixed all these feelings kind of mixed together right because it
was like he had he was there like it was the right idea and the right message the 18 race in
particular it was just a little early like that happens timing is everything better work never
wrong only early except for like a couple things at the end of the presidential but
but other than that and i think you have to give credit to beto for building the infrastructure to
make like when he won in 2018 like he left behind powered by people an organization that has spent
years building for this moment and he's still doing not left behind really there's he's still
doing it they have it's college campus registration and so if you look at texas and there are a bunch
of reasons why by talarico and by 12 and most of them talarico and trump are the reasons but um
you know huge shift in the rio grande valley on hispanic vote you know they're you know huge
shift in the rio grande valley on hispanic vote you know they're you know huge shift in the rio grande
valley on hispanic vote you know they're you know huge shift in the rio grande valley on hispanic vote
that like this was kind of a long time coming but also like on the campuses since he stopped the
presidential campaign has been doing that this organization's been registering kids on campuses
not just ut like all the random ass colleges like all over texas and you did see big turnout um in a
lot of those places totally i mean look he had a vision you know and um and it's it's coming to
fruition and he's worked at it so that's that's fucking great good for beto skateboards water
burger for everybody i did listen when talrico and gina went to the water burger uh after after
i was there i was you were there i was there it was really cool that was cool it was really cool
the uh the fun part or one of the fun parts was uh they walk in and you know in kind of the
hispanic like whatever tex-mex accent i guess from that they want to be employees you know
that's working at the water burger she like screams out like gina i love you let me take
your order and i was just like that's pretty cool because you know there are a lot of people
that like me that gotten tipped off that were there but um i just like the sense of the
natural excitement of the just regular denizens of the water burger at midnight on a tuesday it
was pretty fun i will say that that does sort of bring it to gina who is like everyone talks
about talrico but oh my god what a campaign like flawlessly executed the media stuff was was
brilliant the abortion ad like all that kind of stuff talk about that because i haven't really
covered that that much yeah you mean by that so she ran this ad that you know was sort of told
her own story her own abortion story but you know sort of
moderated on the issue overall just kind of talking about like the value you know you know
how much she wanted to have a baby and the value of life right like in that context right that's
kind of an old school democratic message on abortion yeah yeah exactly like sort of in ways
that resonated with i think the people who might be skeptical like she did a good job you know we
say the word permission structure and our friend of the show peter hamby always rolls his eyes but
she did a good job of permission structuring people and also really focused on education
people are mad about public education
and like this is not a national this is not an issue on the national radar i think i said this
on tuesday night we're like for a while democrats talking about education got bullied into having
the topics that they talked about about schools being what bathrooms kids can use like literally
if you looked at the last six years of democratic campaigns like since obama raised to the top stuff
like they didn't have a message on education and so it was like the republicans culture war stuff
that dominated the education debate and she flipped that on them totally because people
were upset about what was happening to them and she flipped that on them totally because people
with public schools in Texas, and it got her out of that, you know, kind of binary that hurts
Democrats on culture war stuff. They just got the blocking and tackling right. She also focused on
data centers in this race, which was a wedge issue in rural areas. And I think that like,
you know, to the point of like thinking about this as a strategy, Tallarico and her sort of
the recognition that having two strong candidates at the top of the ticket benefits everybody,
like that is a thing that, you know, it was sort of the O'Rourkean, if you drew up the model of
how this was going to work, sort of the plan. And so those campaigns, I think, worked incredibly
well together and just got the little stuff right. Really cool. I don't want other Blacks this thing
for you. So is it a swing state 2028? Oh, I don't know about that. I think we are in the opening
innings of what a long-term Blacks might look like. I just think that like, we need to get a
better picture. So my Blacks is forever Instagram post. You're not there yet. I think Blacks in the
will be Blacks is forever. I think the thing that we haven't accounted for is like who shows up in
presidentials that doesn't show up in midterms. And it was about still a huge turnout for midterm,
but I'm going from memory, but I think it was about a million fewer voters. Yeah. And 26 and
20. And I suspect those million voters are not sitting out because I think the Democrats are
going to win and they're happy about it. You know, and so, you know, I think that it depends
on who's in the top of the ticket on both sides. And in 28, I think it's possible, but it's an
expensive fucking state. And so I don't know, but we'll see, you know, anything's possible.
Can't a good billionaire, can't Dario take his AI money and just throw in
plow 500 million in there to try. I was like, there's no map to, to Republican victory without
Texas. I was messing around just for kicks, you know, while I was high on my own supply on Tuesday
after the Whataburger, I was like, what would the map look like? You know? And you, you really,
and you get into like ridiculous territory. It's like they would have to put New York or something
Georgia and Arizona, you know, it's worth a think worth a think. I was hoping you'd give me a little
bit. I should have had your car. I Jesse, Jesse, Jesse. Yeah. If Jesse would have given me black
says 28 is a swing state. He'd be like, for sure. We'll, we'll have to see. There's, I think there's
a chance. I think there's a chance. Okay. Speaking of swing states, you're giving me the dumb and
dumber bliss Mississippi. Maybe that's a swing state. You mentioned Scott Cologne at the top.
You guys have been on this, been covering his race over on your live stream.
What was it about Scott Cologne's race that made you so confident? And what do you think the state
of play is or not so common? What, what was it about the race that impressed you? And what do
you think about the state of play? So all credit needs to go to Jesse Larrick because he was on
the Cologne train early and he got Cologne to come on our show, which, uh, is hard because
no one watches our show. He is a special person. He has it. He has, he's conversational. He's down
to earth. He's like very, very just like relatable, has a theory of what he's
talking about. Like, I just thought he was like one of the most impressive politicians I've ever
met. And even then I was like, God, it's such a bummer. He's not going to win where Jesse to his
infinite credit was like, Cologne's going to win and sort of called this from the beginning. I
think Scott Cologne got basically everything right. First of all, I do believe that Mississippi is
a swingable state. Like I really believe that it has all the factors that as the sort of largest
proportion of black voters, it is very cheap, um, relative to other states. Like I think with
New Orleans and Memphis were more successful economic engines to create sprawl. Yeah. Right
across our border. Cause you do have like, that has like started to help Wisconsin, right? Cause
Minneapolis has gotten so successful that they're like blue people that are moving out into the
Wisconsin exurbs. And it's like, no, unfortunately, New Orleans and Memphis aren't, we're not really
doing our weight there. Listen, if I, for the sake of the democratic party need to move to
New Orleans, I will, I will, I will move here. You didn't move to the Gulf. You moved to St. Louis.
We need to move into St. Louis. Yeah, exactly. Exactly. My being there will lead to such great
economic stimulation that it will create suburbs. Of course. So, you know, I do believe structurally
that like Mississippi can become a, a swing state in time and, and more affordably than say other
states. But anyway, taking that out, like he had a campaign that knew what it was about. He had this,
like the way, like they made these videos that were like brilliant, but like not so overproduced
that they felt slick. Like it kind of felt like they were just like, oh, we're going to do this.
They were just like making them. So it felt very like a family affair. Like everyone talks about
that, like pick another Senator ad. I thought that was brilliant. But then like on Halloween,
he puts out this like sinners parody. Like they were just having fun. And there's another video
of his that I love. And they just did it a couple of weeks ago. And he, there's a Trump comes to the
state to campaign with Cindy Hyde, Cindy Hyde Smith, who he calls Sydney Hyde, Cindy Hyde prices,
which I thought was brilliant. And he, he goes down the line and it's just talking to everybody
and just like having that conversation. And that's so indicative of like his ethos. He just
grant, he just grinded. And so that's really maybe the best move of the cycle. And so Ron ask,
right. This works across the works for anybody. You know, you can do it running as kind of a
center candidate is left candidate. Like he went down the line of, of people waiting to get into
the Trump rally, asking them what they cared about, you know, telling them, you know, making
little jabs and Cindy Hyde Smith's when they disagree with her on something, being friendly
about it. It was really good. It's great. And, and I actually, I want to like quadruple
underline that point, which is the thing that he gets right. And the thing that Zoran got right
is they made videos that reflected who they were and their brand and their campaign. And you're
right. You don't need to be Mr. Progressive to do that and reach your audience. And also on the
other side, we had Adam Hamilton, the first segment, and he is this way too, giving a kind
of independent, independent, whatever you want to call it, moderate brand, but not doing hippie
punching. Yep. You know, like he didn't do it that way. You know, he didn't do it by like,
you know, trying to find the issues that he disagrees with lefties on and punching them
over that. He like just found different ways to distinguish from Cindy Hyde Smith on ways that felt
kind of moderate and independent. And I think that's pretty noteworthy too.
Yeah. A hundred percent, uh, inclusive.
Okay. I want to go to my nobody knows anything segment, which I teased for you earlier. And that
is the gerrymandering fight and the dummy mandering fight. We spend all this time for good reason,
worried about the mid cycle redistricting, worried that the Republicans were going to steal the
house. You know, Gavin redistricts all of California over this. It's, you know, it was
the opening salvo to his 28 campaign, basically a lot, you know, in Indiana, they, you know,
we have these brave Republican state senators who stopped their gerrymander and then they end up
losing a primary because of it. Um, uh, but Mike Pence was behind that in, in all, pretty much all
of the red States, except for like Tennessee, if it even in Tennessee a little bit where they were
trying gerrymanders, like the opposite happened. And I want to give you a couple of prime examples
in Indiana had, had we just let their, not we, like I had any, like that I had any control,
but like Mike Pence, like thought he was doing good government, but had, had they let the MAGA
Indiana house and Senate, like JD Vance wanted a gerrymander, the state, somebody looked at what
that would have looked like. And Democrats would have, like, I don't know, I don't know, I don't
know. Democrats would have like seven, eight Democrats from, uh, house members in Indiana
that happened because they would have gerrymandered themselves into a total
blindiana, um, South Carolina, the same after the Annie Andrews.
they were talking about uh doing a big gerrymander they ended up doing a small gerrymander in south
carolina had they done a bigger one there would have been a bunch of democrats who went in south
carolina and utah we got we were so excited that we got this court ruling that protected the salt
lake city um congressional district and the democrats do now have um a representative from
salt lake city which is nice but had we let the republicans just gerrymander utah i think there'd
be three democrats yeah and so like anyway i i do i just think it's um you know what i mean the
democrats are gonna have whatever 255 260 some odd uh house members so uh it's a huge win anyway
but uh i just think in the spirit of your of your live stream i think that the gerrymandering fight
is a great example of nobody knowing anything particularly the republicans that were trying
to do the gerrymandering nobody does know anything i do think for all of his like i'm the dark arts
the trump political guy james blair who
cooked up the um the gerrymandering strategy i am so glad to see that motherfucker eating shit
because this is a he should go back to republic spurska and stay there exactly i i think that um
uh truly one of the dumbest decisions that they made all cycle that being said i if i may defend
huge backlash though just really quick before you before you caveat yeah to james blair being an idiot
because i do think it's important to sit on that not only did the gerrymanders functionally not
being a dummy mander with a b but on top of that huge backlash and the turnout among black voters
in the south if you look at like the share of the electorate and most of these states was up two
three four percent more black voters as a share of the total electorate than there were in 2024
all of that was backlash oh absolutely and and look like you know if you want to go one further
on the democracy stuff like hispanic voters swigging back because of the terrorism that
this administration is doing to them through ice i mean the administration is doing a lot of
administration made their own bed here like some of this is thermostatic but some of this is them
just doing stupid stuff um that is anti-democratic and people reacting the thing is that there's no
way to know we were here uh at this moment and so i still think that it was worth um fighting
those gerrymanders uh fight of course you know to be clear to be clear i also think it was worth
fighting the gerrymander fights it's just funny to think about the fact yeah exactly they had we
lost more of those that actually would have been great you know it would have been great
you know it would have been great it would have been indiana it would be pretty fucking funny
for there to be eight eight to one democratic congressional delegation in indiana right now
that would be funny uh but uh i don't know so indiana utah blue tall indiana some blue tall uh
you know someday i think it's more house the four house democratic candidates in utah got more votes
in the four house republican candidates really i didn't know that i had not i had not seen that
that is great news
um well and utah has always had like a little bit of anti-trump in it you know so you know there's a
there's a world where you uh there's a world you could see it like spencer cox is only possible
there and you know like uh he's not only possible but he's he is a function of that environment
okay well i want to do one of your hobby horses which is the ai stuff yeah first you cook on the
ai super packs all these masses of the universe they know everything they have super intelligence
on their sides they put in millions of their dollars into the campaigns how did that turn
out very bad you want to talk about you you really you made you may have noted they didn't they didn't
put their strategy into claude coat and come out with something that would help if if just grock had
told them uh where to put their money maybe it would have gone better here's here's what it is
you want to talk about stupidest decisions of the cycle james blair probably at the very top of it
but you have to also call out the folks behind leading the future who was the ai super pack who
just colossally absolutely fucked up the politics of this um a hundred percent the theory of their
whole thing was no one cares about ai so if we just threaten politicians with money no one will
regulate this and we can all get super rich and that got hit with the fucking buzzsaw of public
opinion uh saying actually we do give a shit about ai and we don't like it um and it made it so toxic
that they couldn't spend anything out of that super pack but then you look at the number two spent the
number one and two spenders on the republican side elon musk and and mark andreessen like the
tech money was a story in this election that was counterproductive um people hated it and so ai
became a driving factor in a bunch of races and so it was just one of the biggest misreads i think
of the whole cycle mark anderson has all that extra cranium space you think he could have used
that to come up with a strategy that might have uh mitigated the worst midterm defeat for the
side that he belatedly joined since you know 1974 yeah it does seem that um what is
in the cone on top of his head is just sort of singularly focused on getting rich uh and he's
doing well with that yeah he's doing well at that you have the data center ballot initiatives another
thing you were early on about just the degree to which this was going to be a backlash i have a
friend that's working on a project he sent this to me data centers on the ballot.com i peeked at
that this morning yeah of the ballot initiatives according to this analysis um where data centers
were implicated um 39 uh ballot initiatives uh said no thank you to data center expansion
one uh was on the other side of that the one ballot initiative was in the municipality of
harwood north dakota which is 45 miles south of buxton right here as the crow falls there you go
and i went and looked at the ballot initiative and i think i really think the win on that one
was more about how the language was pretty misleading like random municipality like it was
like i was looking at it i was like i'm i this is my job and it isn't exactly clear to me reading
data center expansion so i don't know maybe the local news covered it more clearly than the actual
text of the ballot initiative but a pretty big swamping for data centers yeah no they're in big
trouble and you see you see the companies note this um open ai over the weekend said they're
going to rename data centers ai compute campuses and that'll do it you know that'll fucking do i
think that all of the ai executives should just come to uh dc in january get out the kente cloth
you know get down on one knee in front of hakeem jeffries
and see how that goes for them and just and and beg and beg for forgiveness beg for forgiveness
beg forgiveness look i think at the end of their pronouns back in their bio sam altman he him
he him exactly um the the super intelligence can be it they uh and you know i think that like
ultimately though i think what is very clear is like voters are starting to see that
like the data center conversation is moving on to an ai conversation and voters are mad
about the build out of this entire project and um it isn't coming on democrats to have a plan for
that world and for regulating it and so i you know i hope they do take a two by four to a lot of these
companies who are just like getting filthy rich at people's expense all right do you have any
feelings you want to share how are you feeling oh i'm talking in the interior life of rob clarity
dude i'm fucking stoked this is great here's the problem i'm a democrat and so i am like uh looking
at the future being like i don't know we're papering over some problems but like i'm gonna
give it before i start thinking about that i'm gonna give it like a couple of months you know
i'm just gonna be happy
yeah any tears do you have any juju any salty discharge over the last four you know what you
know what when cologne went up at two in the morning yes that was i like i was i had had like
six or seven tequila shots in this fucking live stream and it was 2 a.m and i was like my kids
waking up in two hours my favorite moment of our live stream was i mean it was maybe i was in
tarrant county flipped and sarah sarah started crying i'm like i looked at her it's like are
you crying already because fort worth has flipped to the democrats but she knew she knew she knew
that the as tarrant county went the nation that so go so go to the so yeah i'm getting i'm i'm
getting maybe a slight tear just thinking about old sarah's excitement on the live stream um
been a long 10 years brother it has it has and and you guys look like to the bulwarks credit like
um rallying the never trump crowd and and and the
democracy crowd i mean it's it's part of it it really is we appreciate that homie all right man
we'll keep it uh we'll keep in touch everybody check him out on nobody knows anything he knows
a little bit and um appreciate also uh pastor adam hamilton cinder elect adam hamilton for coming on
the show today uh we'll see you guys back here tomorrow for more gloating peace mine's a handmade
pan fried sun dried south side and beat the devil by a landslide praying with a hands tied president
up something told me y'all should bring my body like it's holy i've been waiting for you for the
whole week the bulwark daily is brought to you thanks for the work of lead producer katie cooper
associate producer ansley skipper and with video editing by dante de chico
and audio engineering and editing by jason brown
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Senator-elect Adam Hamilton won the Kansas Senate race after a long personal and moral conviction that U.S. policies were harming communities, especially immigrants and the marginalized.
His campaign was driven by a deep sense of responsibility to act on faith-based values, particularly the parable of the Good Samaritan, emphasizing love for neighbors over political ideology.
Hamilton highlighted the systemic harms of ICE policies, detention centers, and economic disinvestment, arguing that these issues require urgent legislative attention and moral accountability.
He emphasized the importance of listening to opponents’ fears and building trust through respectful dialogue, believing that genuine change comes from empathy, not confrontation.
His victory reflects a broader democratic shift where voters are responding to anti-status quo, value-driven messaging on affordability, corruption, and social justice.
The success of Democratic candidates in swing states like Georgia, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania demonstrates the power of strong, localized leadership and effective campaign strategy.
These victories signal a shift in political dynamics, with young leaders and grassroots campaigns reshaping state-level power and potentially influencing national policy.
Hamilton’s journey underscores the role of faith, personal conviction, and moral clarity in motivating political action amid national crises.
Summary:
Senator-elect Adam Hamilton's decisive win in Kansas marks a turning point in American politics, rooted not in political ambition but in a deep moral conviction to address systemic injustices. He recounts how personal experiences—such as the killing of activist Renee Goode and the fear of ICE enforcement—sparked his decision to run, driven by a commitment to love one’s neighbor as a core value. This faith-based motivation is central to his campaign, particularly in advocating for immigrant rights, economic justice, and humane immigration policies.
Hamilton emphasizes the importance of listening to opponents’ fears, building trust, and fostering dialogue to bridge divides, drawing on religious teachings like the parable of the Good Samaritan. His victory reflects a broader democratic trend where voters are responding to urgent issues like affordability, corruption, and inequality. Meanwhile, the massive wins of Democratic candidates in key swing states—like Roy Cooper, John Ossoff, and Josh Shapiro—demonstrate the power of strong, values-driven campaigns and localized leadership.
These outcomes suggest that political success is increasingly tied to authenticity, empathy, and effective communication. Hamilton’s journey from a lifelong pastor to a senator embodies a vision of leadership rooted in moral clarity and service, not partisan gain. As he enters the Senate, he commits to continuing the work of “knocking holes in the darkness,” using faith and empathy to guide policy and unite a divided nation.
FAQs
Hamilton was driven by a deep sense of conviction that U.S. policies were harming people and inconsistent with American values. He was particularly moved by events like the shooting of Renee Goode and the treatment of immigrants, which made him believe that change was urgently needed.
Hamilton said his faith guided his values and ethics. He emphasized loving his neighbors, especially vulnerable populations, and referenced the parable of the Good Samaritan to show that true compassion involves action, not just belief.
He highlighted how fear of ICE has kept people from working in meatpacking industries and attending school. He criticized the militarization and politicization of ICE, calling for reform and better protection for those facing detention.
He believes that political divides stem from fear and misinformation. He stresses the importance of listening to opponents, understanding their fears, and building trust through respectful dialogue rather than confrontation.
He expressed humility and a strong sense of responsibility, stating that his win was not just personal success but a moment to serve and bring positive change to the country and his community.
He intends to focus on 'knocking holes in the darkness' by advocating for compassion, justice, and unity. He plans to build relationships with colleagues across the political spectrum and work toward meaningful, inclusive solutions.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.