9/1/26: Hasan Piker Interviewed On Dem Attacks, Abdul, Media & MORE!

This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed human. This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. Do you ever think about switching insurance companies to see if you could save some cash? Progressive makes it easy to see if you could save when you bundle your home and auto policies. Try it at Progressive.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Potential savings will vary. Not available in all states. Want to know you're on the best path to the right car? At CarMax, the price you see is the price you pay. No negotiating. No last-minute surprises. Every car is CarMax certified and backed by a 10-day money-back guarantee so you can buy with confidence. Want to shop from home? Go for it. You can come in when you're ready, take it for a spin, and buy however works for you. No pressure, no haggling. Just the right car. Your way. Visit CarMax.com for details. Want to drive? CarMax. Waiting for your sign? Here it is. Shop Labor Day Appliance deals at Lowe's before they're gone. Get up to 45% off select major appliances. Plus, get free delivery, haul away, installation and parts, and a two-year Lowe's protection plan on purchases of $999 or more. Labor Day deals are on now at Lowe's. In-store and online. Valid through 9-16. While supplies last. Selection varies by location. See Lowe's.com for more details. Hey guys, Sagar and Crystal here. Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election, and we're going to talk about that. We are so excited about what that means for the future of this show. This is the only place where you can find honest perspectives from the left and the right that simply does not exist anywhere else. So if that is something that's important to you, please go to BreakingPoints.com, become a member today, and you'll get access to our full shows, unedited, ad-free, and all put together for you every morning in your inbox. We need your help to build the future of independent news media, and we hope to see you at BreakingPoints.com. Joining us now is a man who has been frequently discussed but rarely interviewed for some reason, Hassan Piker. Welcome. Great to see you, Hassan. It's good to see you, man. Hi. Thank you for having me. Yeah. This is. I'm blacklisted from all of these mainstream outlets, so it's always great to be able to communicate my ideas and not have my first interaction be a negatively framed clip or just outright lies, you know? Well, you don't know what I'm going to start with, so don't judge the seconds. Okay, all right. Definitely don't know what I'm going to start with. Turn the heat on. Yeah. No, I wanted to just start with, like, what does it feel like to have been made the main character of this election, and why do you think that Republicans and establishment Democrats have decided to make you the official boogeyman of the midterm cycle? I think we're living in stupid world. I think we have an illiteracy crisis in America. We have a crisis in critical thinking. The Republicans have completely run out of all other options, really. I mean, what could they run on? Could they run on the economy? Could they run on how Donald Trump has ended all wars? They can't run on any of those things, so they have no good record to run on, and they've decided, egged on by, I believe, initially Third Way and other neoliberals in the consultant class in the Beltway, they decided, you know, we're going to attack the DSA, and we're going to attack Hassan, and it's going to be the, the clip show with the hopes that this will at least divide the Democratic Party's base enough so that they have more competitive chances in the midterms when it's a plus-seven national Democrat-favored environment. Yeah, it is interesting, you know, having met you, I'm always fascinated by people who are like, you know, he's a radical main character, and I was like, that was really the opposite of my experience whenever we met, and we did that event a few months after the Charlie Kirk assassination, but I do, it's a bigger picture, and I really want you to kind of think about this. When Trump has dinner with Nick Fuentes, it's a big story. I'm not comparing the two, but I'm saying he took somebody, he had dinner with him, he was asked about his views, a lot of other Republicans were asked about their views, their most controversial statements. When Tony Hinchcliffe does a Puerto Rico joke at the closing Trump rally, it's a national story about Puerto Rico. Trump has to answer for what Tony Hinchcliffe himself had said when Tucker Carlson campaigns with Trump on the campaign trail. Trump is then asked about things that Tucker Carlson may or may not have said. Abdul, by his own admission, invited you to campaign with him. I believe, you can correct the record if that's true. You do seem very annoyed people keep being asked to, you know, go after, or to renounce things and all that you have said, but it's kind of fair, you know, if you're going to insert yourself as a canvasser and as a campaign surrogate, when I think you yourself would have thought if Trump is going to campaign with these people, well then it is fair to ask whether they agree or disagree with all the things that these people have said. I'm curious for what you think about that. So, I don't disagree with you at all. I think it's perfectly valid. The issue here, however, is that it doesn't actually work, right? And, there is, I think, look, we're all in the media, I think we can all agree, there has never been a media feeding frenzy to this magnitude ever before. Like, the Tony Hinchcliffe thing was, 48 hours max, right? Maybe a week. This has been going on since April and it has only escalated. So, I think there's something more nefarious at play besides a firebrand that is under attack. I think there's different, there are different motivating forces here. Obviously, the most obvious one is, you know, I am a prominent critic of Israel, very frustrating for a lot of people, who recognize that Israel has fallen out of favor and they want to engage in a disciplining operation to make sure that candidates shy away from even communicating their thoughts on Israel. I am being made an example of, right? The other reason for how long this has gone on, right? Not the fact that people are asking about these questions, but more so for the continuation of this manufactured outrage site, that seemingly is not going away. And by Republicans' own admissions, this is their midterm strategy. There was an Axios report that came out, I believe a couple of weeks ago, where they openly said, we don't really have anything else. We're just going to blast clips on the timeline. Hasan Piker, James Tallarico is woke and gay. Abdullah Al-Sayed is a Islamist jihadist. And DSA wants to, you know, imprison every police officer in the country. Like, so that's kind of what they're going with. And the reason why they're going with that is because they just don't have any other options, right? So I see their motivation. I understand their motivation. What's frustrating to me is why mainstream outlets that are otherwise liberal are going along with this beyond the point where it would make sense. Like in what way? Like, what do you mean by that? I mean, this is approximately gone on. This is approximately gone on for more than I would say, like 17 school shooting media cycles. I think the intensity and the frequency of it all, every candidate being asked to condemn me, not just being asked about my comments, but specifically to condemn me and disavow me. Candidates that I've never actually encountered being suspected of engaging in dangerous anti-American activities by the likes of, like Gail King, when she interviewed Angie Nixon, right after she won her primary in this spectacular upset victory. Her first question was not even a question. It was an accusation. You campaigned with a Sunpiker. How do you feel about that? I mean, is that even appropriate? And she was like, I have not, we had not campaigned together, right? But CBS news already had pictures of me ready to go where they put photos of me up next to Angie Nixon's face. And then Gail Nixon was Gail King. Sorry. Was shocked. And, and she followed up with, well, would you even campaign with them? Would you disavow him ahead of time? Like that's a little crazy, right? So I don't think I'm alone in feeling like that's a little crazy because I'm seeing allies in very unlikely places like boomers that have no idea who I am, who are encountering my commentary for the first time ever. And I, I, I just read the Michelle Goldberg, New York times op-ed piece that came out last night. And the comments are, are very mixed. Like you, you would not expect New York times readers and New York times commenters on the op-ed segment to be like, why are we talking about this guy? This guy's fine. He's just activating young people to go out and vote. And, and you're all freaking out. And my, my question always is this. It's not about Nick Fuentes. I don't think that's an apt comparison, but it's more so about Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk was a party apparatchik. He worked within the confines of the Republican party. And Charlie Kirk had a lot of, very viral and very controversial points of view that he expressed with regular frequency. I don't think anyone ever made a big fuss about Charlie Kirk, basically being inside of the white house on a weekly basis, right? The, the analog here is not Nick Fuentes. The analog, the closer analog would be something along the lines of Charlie Kirk. And yet obviously because of my position being on the left because of my advocacy for insurgent candidacies because of the grassroots movement that we're building, on our side, I think a lot of people People in power are frustrated, and that's the reason why this has continued. One last follow-up on this point, because, look, it's a fair comparison. Charlie Kirk was certainly in the White House. He was an instrumental part of the campaign. You're saying, kind of looking at the media asymmetry, I would say it would be entirely fair to look at the things that Charlie had said and then to ask Republicans about it. And so, for yourself, I guess, you know, what I'm looking at is, you know, you kind of have a duality here. Like, it's an aw shucks, I'm just a streamer, but you did go out and canvas and campaign for Francesca Hong. You did go out and campaign for Abdul El-Sayed. You have turned, you know, your community into one which is explicitly political. You are wearing a DSA hat right now. I don't think it's even deniable that you are a leader in a large, you know, in a growing faction within the Democratic Party. So, you know, how are you, you know, squaring this genuine leadership role, which I don't even think you're going to do. I don't think you're going to deny here, with then the political focus that attenuates that. Because, yes, Charlie, well, I would say he actually did get quite a bit of media criticism. Maybe not necessarily to the liking that you want. Laura Loomer, CNN, just did a segment yesterday about Trump and Laura Loomer's own connections. In fact, it was about you, and it was using that juxtaposition and about power. So, if you are going to be the political leader, which it seems you want to be and to use your audience to be, then, you know, you're going to have to be a leader. And doesn't this simply come with the territory of having to then answer and the campaigns themselves for the many of the things that you have said on your platform? No, it does. I totally understand that. My criticism is twofold. One, we're never discussing the actual ideas that I'm pushing for. We're discussing the most negatively framed clips, oftentimes out of context, oftentimes entirely antagonistic to my worldview, right? Because the last media frenzy came. The last media frenzy. Came about because I said something that virtually every single person from Dana Bash to Hannah Arendt has said, right? Ezra Klein has said. The idea that Israel is making Jews in America less safe. And the connective tissue there, of course, is the false conflation between Zionism and Judaism. I obviously oppose this. I'm an anti-Zionist. And that turned into a defamatory media. Where virtually every single major politician in my party, in the Democratic Party, came out with condemnations. Sometimes those condemnations were, ironically enough, saying exactly the same thing I was saying. The idea that Jews should be held responsible for the crimes of Israel is ridiculous, is dangerous, is violent. I was like, yeah, that's what I was saying. You're yelling at me over something that we agree on, seemingly. And my frustration is I'm a media figure. I'm a media platformer. I'm almost a one-person media platformer. I'm endlessly accessible. And yet, real discourse is not taking place. Real discourse is not taking place. And I feel like it's unproductive. And I feel like we are doing a disservice to the masses. And at a time when the Fourth Estate is more important than ever before, when fascism is growing in this country, when there is an unbelievable, unprecedented level of corruption, incompetence, the highest office, I feel like there is a. I feel like there is a real crisis of credibility in mainstream news. And this is part of the reason why people actually have found themselves seeking out independent outlets. Now, this is, of course, beneficial for people like yourselves, people like myself as well. We're in the independent side. And we've actually grown quite a bit. And we've been able to develop quite a bit of credibility with the masses due to our coverage, due to our refusal to abide by certain corporate media. Certain corporate media. Conversations that are not necessarily as impactful or as interesting to the masses at all. Our coverage on issues such as Israel, I think, is also another major reason. No question. They're dropping the ball. And I don't want them to drop the ball. A lot of people think I'm a hater of mainstream media. I'm on the independent media side. No, I rely on it heavily. I rely on good reporting and good journalism heavily. I have great friends that work as investigative reporters in a lot of these outlets. I lean into their work all the time. I would not be able to do what I'm doing effectively if it wasn't for good journalism. And I'm terrified of the prospect of mainstream outlets completely dropping that important role that they play in defending democracy at a time when democracy is in crisis. So, that's my frustration. Overall, we're not having a real conversation about the issues. We're simply having a drama cycle. It's drama cycle after drama cycle. And it's unbelievable. It's unbelievably unproductive. And it's poisonous for discourse overall. Do you hear that? That sound, right? That means that Summer's officially here. It means that grown adults are here. Adults just sprint into the street for a frozen dessert shaped like a cartoon. But this summer, Mint Mobile has a better treat. Every plan, including Unlimited, is $15 a month. And unlike ice cream, it won't drip down your wrist or look nothing like the picture. Does anyone have any cash? Give it a try at MintMobile.com slash switch. Upfront payment of $45 for three months, $90 for six months, or $180 for a 12-month plan required. $15 per month equivalent to taxes and fees extra. New customer offer for initial plan term only greater than 50 gigabytes may slow when network is busy. See terms. Hey, this is Kevin. This is Joe. And this is Nick from Hey Jonas. You know, I recently learned that every Thursday, every 36 minutes, another child in the U.S. is diagnosed with cancer. Think about that for a second. Some of the bravest warriors you'll ever meet aren't professional athletes or superheroes. They're kids in this fight. And every day, these young warriors face challenges most adults couldn't imagine. Yet they continue to show up with incredible courage, determination, and hope. That's why we're proud to support Hyundai Hope on Wheels. For the past 28 years, with support from Hyundai, their dealers, and every new Hyundai sold, Hope on Wheels has contributed over $300 million. And we're proud to be one of the first to contribute to childhood cancer research, helping save more than 40,000 kids. But we're not done yet. We need your help. Together, let's bring every warrior home. Learn more at HyundaiUSA.com/HopeOnWheels or ask about Hope on Wheels at your local Hyundai dealer. I wanted to talk to you more about the Democratic side of this because there have been all kinds of Democrats, John Ossoff being one of the recent disappointing ones, to come out and, yes, I condemn Hasan Piker, an effort to have a congressional resolution officially condemning you, and there's been a question over whether establishment Democrats would rather see Abdul Al-Sayed, obviously linked with you, lose, and whether they would prefer that outcome than having someone who is so closely affiliated with the left be victorious in a swing state. Bernie was asked about this yesterday. Let me go ahead and play his reaction and get you to react to that on the other side. But from what you've seen over the past few days, do these Democrats want to see Al-Sayed lose? Are there any Democrats that want to see that happen? Well, you know, it's a funny thing. The answer is there are some who may. I think most do not. Most understand is we may not like Al-Sayed, we may not like Angie Nixon, but you know what? If we win Michigan and if by some miracle we win Florida, you know what? We're going to control the U.S. Senate, and we would like very much to control the U.S. Senate. In terms of like the DSA candidates heading to Congress potentially next year, like what would your advice be to them? My advice would be is to ignore dumb remarks like Mr. Moswitz. And I hope that he does understand that his views, and I don't want to speak beyond what I know here, but I assume he is very pro-Israeli government is my impression, that that is a tiny minority of where the Democrats are. Oh. I love that he doesn't know too much about Jared Moskowitz. I'd like to live in that world actually. But your thoughts on this question of how many establishment Democrats would actually prefer to see Abdul lose, even if it means that Republicans keep control of the Senate? I think there is a decent number. Many of them have revealed their actual position. They go on Fox News all the time, right? Whether they be consultants or even sitting elected representatives like Josh Gottheimer. And numerous others. It's very clear to me that they would rather throw the Abdul El-Sayed race. Jonathan Chait recently came out and openly admitted this as well. Off of something that David Sirota was saying in Politico where David Sirota admitted like, "If Democrats had an opportunity to throw the Michigan Senate race, but then win the majority elsewhere, they would take it 100% of the time." And Jonathan Chait said, "Yes, absolutely. Why wouldn't we do that?" And that blows my mind. So, what, 52 Democrats is somehow worse than 51 Democrats? Especially at a time when you have someone like Jon Fetterman that is an ultimate spoiler. I mean, it's ridiculous to openly admit that. And I think it's obvious to me that these guys are unbelievably out of touch, right? They're out of touch and out of step with the needs of the masses. They do not talk to regular folk. They have no understanding of how regular Americans see Israel at this point. They're in a beltway bubble. And they. cannot contend with the reality out there. And that's part of the reason why they're flailing and burning the remainder of their credibility at a time when it's really important for mainstream media to maintain some level of credibility so they can disseminate information. When, you know, obviously Twitter is not exactly the best town hall for disseminating real and truthful and accurate reporting. I mean, it's ridiculous. There's insane amounts of right-wing commentary, right-wing sentiment, neo-Nazi sentiment flying on that platform. We should stop using Twitter as a news desk editor. I say this as a power user. I'm still, you know, I'm constantly tweeting myself. I just tweeted right before we got on. But I don't think that we should be using as a news desk editor. And I don't think that mainstream outlets should be using Fox News as a news desk editor. I think that's poisonous to discourse overall. See, I think you're focusing heavily on mainstream and you totally agree. However, I don't think it's fair to say it's entirely because of mainstream news coverage that John Ossoff, you know, made the comments that he made. Ossoff, I believe by your own admission, is a very talented politician. I know you've praised him before on your platform. He came out from a calculated political perspective with a prepared statement to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution because he thought it would be beneficial to the American people. He thought it would be beneficial to the American people. You also had the recent situation with Abdul El-Sayed where El-Sayed said, nobody speaks for my campaign after that whole fracas with Jeremy Moss and the Jewish, you know, coalition of Democrats in the state of Michigan. That's not a mainstream problem. It's clear that they found you enough of a liability to have to moderately distance. So what and how do you square that with politicians how you already admire? I mean, it's pretty obvious. What's going on there. John Ossoff is, John Ossoff is Jewish. And yet, time after time, and I remember, I also am a pundit myself. I'm a commentator. So I'm covering this stuff in real time without being heavily involved in it, right? And I've seen it over and over again. Anytime John Ossoff has been critical about sending weapons to Israel, there is a coalition of Jewish advocacy organizations in Atlanta, in Georgia, broadly, that are masquerading as Jewish advocates. They're not Jewish advocacy organizations, but are simply Israel advocacy organizations that will come out, take out ads in newspapers and hound him. That was actually part of the reason why I thought he was a dark horse pick, that he could be a potentially very interesting candidate for 2028, because he had this ability to read the room and moderate his perspective, or at least try to find a reasonable perspective given what his constituency wanted. But yeah, this was a mistake for my estimation, but it was one that he was forced into because AJC and numerous other outlets were constantly pressing him. And this didn't start last week. This didn't start with the last media cycle. It actually started a while ago when I said John Ossoff was actually my dark horse pick. Reporters would come up to him and demand that he disavow me ahead of time. Third way, sent him a questionnaire. All the way back, I believe, in May, asking if he would disavow me. Wait, they sent him a Hassan Haiker questionnaire? Why? We have not collaborated with one another? Specifically? They sent him a Hassan Haiker questionnaire? Yes, a questionnaire. A questionnaire? Oh my God. Yes. Yeah, but he doesn't have to answer. They sent a questionnaire to John Ossoff. That's what I'm getting at, is I agree, but he doesn't have to answer. Politicians know how to tell reporters to fuck off all the time, including John Ossoff. No, but he did answer. That's kind of what I'm getting at, is that this seems to be the central tension of you want to be a leader, you want to be a leader, you want to be a leader, you want to be a streamer. It seems that the streaming seems detrimental to being the leading. And so I'm curious how you're working through this, because it seems to be a new phase of your career, right? It's one thing to fuck around on Twitch and just react to some crazy stuff. It's another. You're fundraising, you're out there campaigning, you're going door to door. That is a different realm. And it does seem as if there's a little bit of incompatibility, and I'm curious how you're thinking about that. Yeah, I think the biggest incompatibility actually stems from the format that I'm on. It's, you know, I speak for eight hours a day on hotly debated issues. Anyone and everyone can tune in anonymously and in real time send comments back. There's also a lot of parasocial people out there. This is a tough conversation to broach for a lot of boomers, but there are a lot of people who become inflamed and become obsessive. Like, I don't know, like hyper fixate on me, both positively and negatively. And some of those negative hyper fixators will then spend every waking moment on Twitter trying to kickstart the next outrage cycle. This was before mainstream media started getting involved more heavily on the fun. This is something that I've had to deal with for the past decade or so. It's just impossible to be a political commentator in this format without having people clip you out of context. So I just see it as, as a unfortunate byproduct of, of doing this job. I see it in the same vein as, as, you know, getting swatted and getting stalked and harassed. Yeah. It sucks. It shouldn't happen, but it does. Right? Yeah. And you also wouldn't have. I just have to take the L on that. Now, having said that. Yeah, I was going to say, you also wouldn't have the position that you have as a leader if you didn't do what you do. Like, that's what enables you to marshal your community to make calls and go canvas. And, and fundraise for these candidates. Yeah, absolutely. I think it's a really great organizing vehicle. Um, especially if someone is stubborn enough to push through, uh, the, the negativity. And if, if someone is a resilient enough, someone has a moral compass and, and they, they, uh, abide by that, uh, over anything else. Um, you know, you can, you can get on, on the other side of that with a, with a force that, uh, you can deploy, uh, towards specific, uh, towards specific policy positions that the overwhelming majority of Americans actually demand. And yet politicians do not represent at all for some weird reason. But I think that's ultimately the reason why I'm getting attacked all the time is because it's not just about Israel. Obviously it's about corporate lobby, uh, corporate lobbyists and their influence in, in Washington, DC as well. There's gotta be a reason as to why so many politicians all around the country placed the interest of corporate profits over the interest of the masses. And, uh, someone has to be a platform for the anxiety and the enmity and the anger that people feel. And I am that platform. I am that megaphone. Um, so yes, I have a lot of very powerful enemies in the process from Elon Musk to even, uh, the president has now mentioned me, but I'm going to keep doing what I'm doing because, uh, someone has to be out there fighting back. Uh, someone has to be out there marshalling the forces and, and, uh, galvanizing the masses and making sure that we make these necessary changes because I feel like this crisis is far too large to avoid. But in your analysis, you're assuming you're a net positive. Has this made you question whether you're a net negative? Yeah, I mean, I personally do, yes. And I'm, I'm fairly certain that many of these left insurgent candidates also feel that way, uh, regardless of, of how hard they get punished for their affiliations. Uh, and, uh, yeah, I think DSA probably feels that way as well. Uh, many, many members in my community, uh, and, and many members overall, many. Americans overall, uh, whether they, they have a positive feeling with me, a positive feeling of me or a negative one, doesn't matter if we were to implement some of the policies that we're advocating for, that we're going to consistently continue pushing for, uh, whether it be Medicare for all or an arms embargo on Israel. I'm, I'm fairly certain that this would have positive reverberations for all Americans, maybe even people all around the world, if we were to baby scale back on our endless militarism, um, they don't have to like me. Um, they can, they can just get out of the way. Yeah. Well, the interesting thing is if you look at the democratic primaries in particular, I don't think there's, there's no doubt that you were in that positive. If you look at, they tried to make you a major issue in the Zoran versus Cuomo fight completely failed. They tried to make you a major issue in the Abdul versus Haley Stevens fight. And not only that fail, I mean, you can look at Abdul's polls after you were made this sort of a wedge issue in the democratic primary is when he takes off Mallory McMorrow takes the other side of that. She ultimately has to drop out and he's able to, um, to secure a victory. So do you think that in the general election, do you think Republicans feel that this is working for them? Do you think that establishment Democrats feel that this is working for them? And what would your advice be to candidates like, you know, the John Ossoffs of the world, if he could go back and do it over again, how should they handle questions about you? Um, I think it's the reason why people are attacking me is because it has failed so far. It's because we are succeeding, right? Uh, when you go back to 2010, the tea party movement was backed by the Koch brothers. It was Astro turfed entirely. Um, and they only got four, uh, new members elected to open seats. Two incumbents were flipped in the Republican party. We've had more than 10 at this point, um, all around the country and it's entirely grassroots funded. It's entirely backed by the people. And in some of these races, like Abdul's, There's also $74 million in outside expenditures coming in and attacking him. I mean, he was outspent 12 to one, something along those lines. And there are also races that I'm not involved in where candidates that are left populist are outperforming expectations. Peggy Flanagan is a great example of this in Minnesota. She was outspent, I believe, six to one. Yeah, similar story with Angie Nixon in the in the primaries as well. So this isn't just about me. I'm just the person that is is the easiest to disparage as a movement leader. Right. And I'm very stubborn, so I'll push through it regardless. It doesn't feel great, but it doesn't really matter. But that is the reason there's a reason why they're attacking me. It's not because all of a sudden, I don't know, a congressperson in in Las Vegas, found out about who I was and and started watching some clips and got really angry. Right. I don't think that's the reason. I mean, someone is giving them notes on what to say. There's no there's no world where someone like Debbie Stabenow in Michigan knows who I am. Right. Someone told her, like, you have to speak on this. This is a bad guy. Here are some of the quotes that he's made. You have to go out and condemn this guy. And Debbie comes out and says, this guy is a vicious anti-Semite. We got to deal with them. Do you think the Democrats handle these? Outrage cycles different than Republicans do? Like, do you think there's something for Democratic candidates to learn from this sort of fuck you energy of Republicans? Yes. Jump on down. Yes. They need to lean into their base. They need to lean into the anger that their base is representing right now. Democrats need to stop playing ball with cynical actors. OK, I don't do it. I wish they wouldn't do it either. It's very frustrating to watch Democrats play politics. We are supposed to hold him, a podcaster, a Twitch streamer, to a higher standard than the president of the United States of America, who isn't just saying unhinged things. I mean, he literally said he was going to do a genocide in Iran a couple months ago, right? But he's also doing horrible things. He's doing unlimited amounts of violence. He's destroying the American economy. He's destroying the global economy. And we're supposed to sit here and constantly complain about a Twitch streamer? This is ridiculous. It's preposterous. If Democrats came out in unison and dealt with the issue with sincerity and with a little bit more anger, the same anger that their base feels, I think this story would have been packed up easily. They would have been able to deflect this barrage of Republican attacks. And then from that point on, the media could have me on to ask me to interrogate and examine my worldview. Why is that not happening? I mean, Jake Tapper had Max Miller on. Max Miller allegedly abused his wife and his two-year-old daughter, allegedly, right? There's a court proceeding that took place. This is the daughter of the Ohio Senator Bernie Marino. Jake Tapper had him on the show to interrogate him. Republicans are not even talking about him right now. And that's partially because Democrats are too busy yelling about me. So it's not even just about like the Laura Loomers of the world, which I don't even think is an apt comparison. If I spoke about Jewish people in the way that Laura Loomer speaks about black people or Muslim people, I'd be shot. I'd go to prison, I think. And I don't feel that way, right? I feel like she represents some of the most odious views that we're desperately trying to move on from, desperately trying to run away from, desperately trying to disavow. And yet she gets to operate as a. As a attack dog for the Republican Party with regular frequency, partially because Democrats are constantly eating the bait and they're constantly worried about whatever the Republicans want them to be worried about. We have to stop apologizing to the Republicans. We have to stop leaning in to the cynical ways in which the Republicans choose to rip apart the base. We have to unite and become the anti-Trump coalition force that is necessary. We have to fight back against Trumpism, to fight back against fascism, and to preserve what remains of American theoretical democracy. Time is running out. And I really wish that establishment Democrats were smarter about this. Progressive Casualty Insurance. Insurance company and affiliates. Hey, this is Kevin. This is Joe. You know, I recently learned that every 36 minutes, another child in the U.S. That's why we're proud to support Hyundai Hope. For the past 28 years, with support from Hyundai, their dealers, and every new Hyundai sold, Hope on Wheels has contributed over $300 million to childhood cancer research, helping save more than 40,000 kids. We need your help. Learn more at HyundaiUSA.com slash Hope on Wheels or ask about Hope on Wheels at your local Hyundai dealer. We know kids don't hold back. And I wouldn't want them to. Get in there. Make a mess. Slide for home. Bring on the stains. I've got OxyClean Versatile Stain Remover. It works on over 100 stains, and it's America's number one stain-fighter additive brand. It's color-safe and chlorine-free. So, I use it on whites, colors, and dark fabrics. And OxyClean isn't just for laundry. Mix it with water for use all around the house, kitchens, bathrooms, and even floors. When my kids go all in, I say go for it. Because I've got OxyClean to get the stains out. It's not clean unless it's OxyClean. In their mind, their belief is that an alliance and an elevation of someone like yourself with the past quote of America deserved 9-11. I know you've apologized for it. You did say it. I think you even said at the time, should I say it? Something like that. I said, fuck it. I'm saying it. Yeah, right. And so, you know, you're a young guy. You knew it was bad. You apologized for it, I believe, the next day on Cenk's show. The question, then, is they believe that to achieve the coalition is that to have someone who has said these things, someone who is part of, quote, woke one, even though I know you've kind of moved on from that. Or at least in our last discussion, you certainly had that this would be electorally detrimental to the independent voter. And, you know, what you've just said is that, oh, we need to give to the Democratic base. But there are positions, things, not even just you said, things of Abdul have said that he's had to walk away from, which could be big problems for him coming into the midterm election. So how do you square that? If that you do have the, let's say, a union guy, he voted for Trump, he's pissed off about prices, but he's not so down, let's say, with Trump. Woke one, defund the police. America deserved 9-11. What's your role in that if you prevent him necessarily from voting for Abdul El-Sayed? Yeah. So, first of all, you know, I'm not going to be able to to captivate the attention of every single person. Right. Like that. I know that already. I know that I'm not appealing to like a 75 year old retiree, small business owner, finance executive. They're they're probably not going to be super fans of mine. Right. I'm here for the under 45. Young men in particular who never really see responsive politics. They never they've developed too much apathy. They've gone out. They've protested. They maybe even voted for a couple of Democrats that they didn't really like. They plug their nose and they did it because they they believe in harm reduction. And now they're sick and tired of it. Right now, they're looking for an alternative. They're looking for someone who's actually going to fight back, actually going to represent their needs. Right. So that's my goal. As far as as far as how frustrating this could be to hold together a larger coalition, we were, again, taking for granted a lot of these other voters, a lot of these people that that I'm bringing on to not only participate in their civic duty, but also participate in a more meaningful matter in in getting others to come out and vote on the other side. Of course, politician or politician. Politics are about addition, not subtraction. subtraction right so i'm totally on board with bringing on people who are independents people who have different uh opinions than me into uh into this broad coalition it's it's those on the other side it's those on the right the right wing of the democratic party the right wing in the consulting class uh that actually oppose our involvement in any way shape or form um that's that's the that's the real issue i want to build a big tent they don't i understand that we have to organize the masses to make sure that we have a strong enough base of support to get this agenda done i believe in democracy they do not they don't want to hear from the masses they don't want to hear about their discontent they just want everybody to shut up and vote for the democrats and they're very frustrated that now there is a massive platform like yours as well that actually expresses this discontent with regular frequency and is growing and and is is making up for the limited credibility that mainstream media has at this moment well and the real problem for them too is that your views now are much more aligned with the 70 year old retiree in the democratic party base than the democratic establishment is at this point and so you know that's why you you pose a particular threat to them my last question for you hassan is just you know do you have any other plans in terms of tactics to to fight back are you pursuing a defamation lawsuit against scott jennings for example what are your thoughts on that yeah i'm i'm continuing along with that and uh we'll see uh we'll see where this goes because i i feel like it has gotten uh it's gotten completely out i think someone has to like someone has to fight back uh someone has to fight back because i just we can't go on like this we have no consensus reality we have no consensus reality i get so frustrated about this i i spend a good deal of my my uh time every day uh trying to identify misinformation and disinformation that runs among on on the internet uh and and try to get people to to understand what's exactly what's actually going on and it's so frustrating to see uh the the way that people uh trafficking uh defamation and slander and smears and i think it's it's it's it's it's it's i think it's partially because no one's really pushing back no one's really fighting back um in a different timeline i think uh the way this would work is you'd get punished for it right if you were uh actively uh uh getting paid to slander people uh mainstream outlets would probably say all right uh we're gonna we're gonna make sure that uh you either uh recalibrate your commentary or or you're done you're out and yet scott jennings i would say goes on cnn every night specifically for that purpose so we can be an attack dog for donald trump so we can audition to be the white house press secretary right and and this is this weird mutually beneficial relationship uh for for cnn executives who who want to win favor with the ellison's and cnn uh top anchors and and top producers who want to make sure that they don't get fired in the ellison purchase right um so they're they're playing that role but i think in the process of playing that role they are destroying what remains of the credibility of cnn as an institution people already people on the right and many independents already despise cnn and now they're going to burn their credibility with a lot of liberals as well and i don't know if it's if if it's worth it i don't i don't want to live in a world where there is uh there's no reliability in mainstream outlets i i unfortunately we live in that world right now for a bunch of different issues right when it comes to american foreign policy i don't expect any of these major outlets these legacy publishers to actually uh do do serious investigative reporting they'll every now and then they'll do it in an effort to to regain some of that credibility right there'll be like one article or two uh investigative reports that come out maybe months after the fact um and and we'll say wow that's interesting i can't believe new york times reported on this finally but but i wish that they were there i wish that they were there from the start because this is a real crisis yeah well and the thing is you as a to work with but the truth of the matter is what they did to you they could do to anyone they could take i mean the same sentiment you expressed about jewish americans something sovereign i've both expressed many times on this show and is thoroughly should be thoroughly uncontroversial would be easy enough to clip something out of context put it out there into in the world and completely mischaracterize what any public commentator says so i did the mark rovello yeah they did the mark rovello at the same time they were doing it to me and they did it to abdul the hurt people hurt people comment if you watch the four minute video you're going to be like oh my god i'm video that he put out because the first day of the synagogue attack abdul comes out with a statement just straightforward condemnation uh completely unacceptable because it is right it's completely unacceptable people should never have to fear of a uh of an attack when they're in a place of worship like that's ridiculous right so he comes out with the condemnation and then the next day he explains the cycle of violence he explains the cycle of violence and in the incidents uh cause violent and unacceptable completely unacceptable uh violent retaliation against you know civilians against uh people who uh didn't participate in this in any meaningful manner whatsoever and and that the person who did this was a heinous person was a small person um all this stuff he does this like four minute video and they just nail down the hurt people hurt people quote to make it seem like abdul was just like disparaging the concerns of of jewish folk he did apologize though you know sometimes you have to sometimes you literally cave to the mob it's it just it sucks but it's the truth you you when you're running for office sometimes you're just going to have to say look i didn't intend for this to to turn into a a massive problem i didn't intend for you to misunderstand my position i shouldn't have said anything um and that's that's what he did and i hope that people see that uh as as humility and and understand that he's not this like scary islamist jihadist guy that he's being presented with your fighting energy earlier this is just kind of you know because to me it seems like you know look abdul frequently just deletes stuff and pretends that he never said he outright lies about what he said about defund the police uh just delete stuff that he said about transgenderism and kids decides not to talk about it talk about adult circumcision in this case he felt like he had to apologize i don't know i just read it a little differently it's like it's pretty clear that he did think that he screwed up even though i don't know i don't know i don't know i don't know i agree with you necessarily on the sentiment do you disagree with the sentiment though no no no listen i'm not one of these pro-cancel culture freaks i just look at his behavior and i'm like okay so he'll lie about i didn't say defund the police he'll lie about uh one of his previous past positions on transgender you know circumcise or conflated to circumcision but on this one he's like oh i have to apologize i'm like i don't know i mean it seems like he feels especially considering what happened with this jeremy moss situation and now with this and then yesterday he's speaking at some jewish democrats event and you know he's you know doing his absolute best to make sure he's like i'm here i love you all etc it seems to him for him having said screw you to many other attacks in the past he seems to believe that this is a problem that's all i'm saying that's part of the reason you know in this interview i'm like i'm curious in that assessment of his behavior he is behaving not as if this is like a humility exercise but as in this is an actual electoral problem for me in this race yeah i don't know to what degree it's a it's a serious problem i think we're just reading the tea leaves at this point um yeah but i mean that's just politics that's just politics you gotta you gotta win over as broad a coalition as possible um there's a real crisis here if we allow someone like mike rogers to to come into office uh who is is going to be a rubber stamp on trump's agenda someone who has actually been an advocate for mass surveillance uh uh since uh since the post 9 11 uh days someone who is an advocate for going to war someone who was an advocate for going to war with iran uh and now we're in that war with iran these are people who are going to try to run away from much more nefarious positions than uh than than people who demonstrate the basic american uh mentality which is i think medical decisions should be kept between a patient and a doctor because that's what the transgender issue is all about at the end of the day um i don't really uh i don't really care about what people have said in the past as far as like how woke they were um and you said i was a trafficker in woke 1.0 right i mean i got yelled at quite a bit from people who uh were were not even to my left necessarily but people who presented themselves as to my left at the time because i would constantly say i'm not saying latinx i'm not doing all this and that i didn't make a big deal about it though and i didn't like you know humiliate people for for um trying to be as accommodating as possible but i understood that there was some social excesses that were taking place but at the end of the day i i think we have a a limited amount of time on god's green earth i'm not going to spend it yelling at people who wanted to be as accommodating as possible to others and definitely got a little selfish at times uh especially when on the other side there are people who are just as hysterical but also immoral because let's be real i'm a leftist i believe that That this position is broadly the morally correct position, the morally correct side of the political spectrum, the political ideology. Even if they're being annoying, I can engage in comradely discussions and say, hey, maybe don't present yourself this way. I think this is not very helpful for our cause. I don't think you're winning a lot of people over to our side. And those are productive moments of discourse on our side. It's an internal discussion. But I don't think we should be spending a great deal of time. If we're leftists, we should be spending a great deal of time constantly talking about how people wanted to restructure the police budgets in this country that have expanded endlessly and have militarized heavily and are not producing the results they're supposed to, even though crime is actually down. So I guess to a certain degree, they are producing some results. So. I can't really hate on that right now. But having said that, my position on this is this. Okay. My position on policing, for example, is do your job. There's three jobs in this country, three professions in this country where you get rewarded for failure. It's policing. It's CEOs and it's politicians. They fail upwards all the time. They're allowed to fail. Your car gets stolen. You call up the cops. You're like, can you please help me with this? And they look at you like you've asked them the most unacceptable thing of all time. I'm like, come on, man. This is your job. That's what I want. I want. I want cops to do their jobs. Some of them are doing their jobs. Who releases the guy who steals the car, though? It's an interesting question, right? Look, we don't have the guy who stole the car. Is that what you said? Yeah. Well, I was like, how did it exactly get to the point where the guy's on the street and maybe he's been released for on no cash bill? Let's say, for example, look, we don't need we don't have nearly enough time to do. I know. I know. This is this is the fun part where you and I, you know, don't even get me started about marijuana, even though I didn't even smoke. Well, that was good. That would be my parting shot is I just wanted to remind you that when you were canvassing, you went across the state of Wisconsin and you got mad and you made a great pitch. You said Francesca Hong's going to legalize weed. And so I watched with great amusement as she lost in that primary after you promised these people that she was going to legalize weed. And so maybe that was directly the reason the electoral benefit. Uh, that you. You may have thought, Mr. Piker, uh, to go around and promise that lady was wearing a T-shirt and she really liked it. So you just had to do it. You had to go around there and I messaged you. So you just had to throw the weed thing in there. And so I just wanted to remind you that it didn't work. Uh, and so maybe she lost because of that. She lost because of Thanksgiving and she lost because of her pro weed position. Yeah, I'm out here spinning that narrative. Yeah. All right, Hassan. Thank you so much for getting up. Early for us. I know you have to go. So thank you very much. Yeah, it's our pleasure. Thank you guys for watching. As you can assume, the show is already late. So sorry. Uh, it's been a long interview, but we wanted to make sure we did it justice. There'll be a great show for everybody tomorrow. Ryan and Emily AMA. Tune in for that. We know kids don't hold back and I wouldn't want them to get in there. Make a mess. Slide for home. Bring on the stains. It works on over a hundred stains and it's America's number one stain fighter additive brand. It's color safe and chlorine free. So I use it on whites, colors, and dark fabrics. When my kids go all in, I say go for it because I've got OxyClean to get the stains out. This episode is supported by FX is the drop, a snowfall saga. Wanda and Leon are back, but this time they're chasing a different kind of legacy. As West coast rap begins to take over nineties, Los Angeles, Wanda is betting on a new generation of artists, but in a city where every opportunity comes with a price, they'll have to decide what they're willing to risk to leave their mark. FX is the drop premieres September 8th. On FX and Hulu. Hey, it's Mario Lopez from the all Mario Lopez daily podcast. All right. Quick question. You ever notice how some cars just steal the spotlight? Well, that's the 2026 Toyota Rav4. It's got bold standout style, intuitive tech inside, and now hybrid power standard, which means efficiency without the need to plug in. So whether you care about looks, smarts, or just everyday practicality, Rav4 brings all of it. You've been holding out for the right SUV. This is your sign. Check out the 2026 Toyota Rav4 at your local Toyota dealer or visit toyota.com. See packages and options at toyota.com for feature availability. Guaranteed human.