510 - Lindsay Clancy, Darline Graham, & The American Woman
68m 4s
The host of the Tim Dylan show delivers a provocative and emotionally charged analysis blending weather manipulation, mental health, and feminist activism. He argues that humanity must actively control nature, rejecting harmony with the environment, and expresses hope for technological mastery over storms and weather. Central to the discussion is the Lindsay Clancy trial, where a woman accused of strangling her three children is portrayed not just as a criminal but as a victim of postpartum psychosis and systemic neglect. The host emphasizes the powerful public response—women in pink, holding signs and children, supporting Clancy as a symbol of maternal resilience and resistance against patriarchal expectations. He critiques societal judgment, highlighting how the case has become a rallying point for women to assert agency and empathy. The segment also briefly touches on a terrorism case involving Jessica Bowie, using it to underscore societal vulnerabilities, while contrasting it with the raw authenticity of Senator Darlene Graham’s unpolished, candid response to national security questions. Ultimately, the host frames the Clancy case as a transformative moment in American culture—one where grief, feminism, and public solidarity converge, and where a woman’s trauma becomes a shared narrative of empowerment. The tone is celebratory, with the host imagining a joyful, carnival-like celebration if Clancy is acquitted, reflecting a deep belief in the power of collective emotional response to redefine justice and motherhood.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Tim Dylan show wrapping up summer here. The weather, again, I don't want to be that guy that keeps talking about the weather, but the weather is fucking insane. Every other day, it's a thunderstorm. We're going to have to start actively fighting the weather. Not this whole idea that we should live in balance and in harmony with nature, I don't subscribe to that. We have to fight the weather. We have to try to control it. And I think we can. A lot of people are naysayers and go, you'll never, the forces of nature will never, we can ensured because it has been a very wet summer, tornadoes, hurricanes. We got to figure a way to dominate the natural world even more than we have. Some people go, oh, this is the result of global warming because we've dominated the natural world. Well, let's stop at halfway. It would be great if we could fully dominate it, like if we controlled the tides and we control the weather because sometimes storms are nice and needed. We should be the ones going storm is on Sunday. That's okay. Living, I mean, what happened in Nepal is terrible. Living with the uncertainty of nature is crazy. Being able to fully control it and, uh, and be able to prepare for it. That is the goal. That should be the goal. Let's dominate the planet. Let's control the weather. Truly, like if we could do this, why would we not? Why would we not be doing it if we could, and is that what harp is trying to control the weather? Cloud seating. They tried to get on my show, those cloud seed people. I'm like, you're not coming on the show. They tried to get on like three days after that Texas camp flooded. The cloud seating people were like, Hey, how about we're, we're doing a couple of shows. We'd like to come on and go, what? You, what are you nuts? The camp just floated and away and everybody died. We'd like to come on the show and address that the hell you will. But the point is I, I, I've been really disappointed by this weather and it sucked. So I hope somebody, somebody out there figures it out. Maybe the cloud seating is not the way to go. It does seem like the more and more of that, and everyone's going to go, well, controlling the weather is probably why maybe why the weather patterns are changing or why there was more extreme rain or whatnot. But that's because we're not controlling it. The way it needs to be controlled. We're never going to revert to the Native American way of life. God bless them where we live in peaceful harmony with nature. That seems that's the ship has sailed on that. Our only, the only thing we can do now is, is through science control the weather. And I hope people are working on that and I think they are, but they're not coming on this show. I'll tell you that much. Not until they figured it out. When you get it right, you can come on this show until then you, you stay off. You're not going to come in here to run PR. When you figured it out and you can control tornadoes that we can go to the sphere unless Vegas and see dancing tornadoes that we control. Great. But not until you guys have figured it out. I want to talk about Lindsey Clancy because I've been, you know, I've been, I've been late to the game on this here. I was on threads, which is like Instagram's Twitter and threads is a very, very sick place. Twitter is as well. Axe. Axe is like a bunch of grifters and not season whatnot and the threads is like a bunch of people with self-diagnosed autoimmune disorders and autism and the voluntarily disabled, the body positive, whatever. So the Lindsey Clancy case, do we have something that could just bring our audience up to speed on what this is? Because I do want people to get caught up because like, by the way, I had no idea this was going on. Yeah, this video explains it. Okay. So we're going to watch a little bit of this video. This is the, she's a pretty woman, isn't she? There's a little bit of a pretty lady. So now, first of all, I'm just going to say this before we watch this video. This is trick. This is a woman who's killed three of her children. The defense is not claiming that she didn't kill them. She is not claiming that she didn't kill them. And yet, there are a lot of people, there are a lot of people who've rightly on threads and other places, but largely on threads have pointed out another fact that it's not easy to be a woman. That's another fact has been pointed out that it is difficult to be a woman. So I do want, I'm not usually a trigger warning fan or person, but I will say to any women out there who may have killed your children, this might be triggering for you. Any women out, and I get I'm not holding you responsible for their deaths. I'm just saying any, any woman out there who may have killed her children, this may be triggering to you. Whether you're responsible for their deaths or not, because it is, because people are bringing this up, how difficult it is to be a woman. And I don't think we should ignore or discount that like truly. And as a man who's never killed three children, it's almost not my place to speak on it. Actually, it's almost not my place to speak on it. And I don't know, especially as a gay man who does not, who doesn't have sex with women or live with them or have children with them who they then kill. As someone who said, none of those experiences is very difficult for me to weigh in on this topic. But there are a lot of people on threads and we're going to read some of those posts who've kind of educated me. And I do, I'm grateful for that. So this is the Lindsay Clancy trial. And again, I don't want anyone to pass judgment on this woman for killing her children. Because there's more to it. And I don't even know if she's guilty in the technical sense just because she did it. You see what I mean? And I think that's, and that's a very evolved way to look at it. And a lot of people are doing so. So here it is. This is Lindsay Clancy trial. If you're like me, and you were unaware that this was really going on because you're kind of just mad at the weather, please indulge yourself in this. But don't judge. I don't want a bunch of judgemental people watching this. I want people with open minds and open hearts. Take it away. Evidence of trauma to her neck. A Massachusetts courtroom. The trial of Lindsay Clancy exposed the depths and consequences of a mother's depression and possible psychosis. He screams she killed the kids. Clancy admits to strangling her children. But what was going on in her mind at the time is the question on trial. For prosecutors Shannon Buckingham, the facts point to murder. This was not a woman in the throws of psychosis on January 24th, 2023. This was a woman who acted intentionally, rationally, and swiftly to accomplish a very specific goal to kill. But for Clancy's defense team and hundreds of supporters who've shown up outside the court. Thank God it was a tragedy caused by postpartum psychosis and over medication by doctors. They say she was following urgent commands by a voice in her head. This was a woman that was suffering from psychosis at the time that she went down to that basement. She had no motive. She loved her children. In the opening days of the trial, prosecutors established a timeline. They argued that Clancy sent her then husband Patrick on a series of errands to CVS and to pick up dinner at an out-of-the-way spot to give herself a window of time to do the unthinkable. When Patrick got home, the house was quiet and when he entered the locked bedroom. I just saw blood everywhere and the window is open. Lindsay had cut herself and jumped from the second story window. She was badly injured but still alive.
I said, "What happened?" And what was her response? She said, "I tried to kill myself." Did you ask her anything else? I said, "Where are the kids?" And what was her response? She said, "They're in the basement." The three children were in the basement strangled by their mother using exercise bands. Later from the hospital, Lindsay would tell Patrick that a voice commanded her to kill them. She said she heard a man's voice telling her that if she didn't do it now, she would lose her chance or something like that. - And did she also tell you that she had had a moment of psychosis? - I don't recall. - The prosecution would call more than 70 witnesses, attempting to prove that Clancy knew exactly what she was doing and was in full control of her actions. - Thank you, she made a statement. - Did the defendant tell you that the voice told her where to kill the children? - No. - Did the voice tell her in what way to kill herself? - No. - The fact that the voice, according to the defendant, the voice didn't tell her any of those things, but instead just said, "Kill the kids so you can kill yourself." Is that significant in your evaluation in any way? - Yes, prosecutors appointed to her diary where Clancy wrote, "I'm so desperate to get a mental break from taking care of everyone that my mind is trying to make something physically wrong with me." She also describes herself as sleep deprived and paranoid. - Can I, can we stop it for a minute? Because this is obviously a tragedy and it's a terrible story. And again, my primary sympathies are with the mother. I don't see how anyone could digest these facts and feel any other way. I'm being genuine here. I guess I would also have sympathy for the children, mate like maybe, and potentially the father, but it does seem if we're gonna really start emoting as I do sometime, you know what I do in moat. People think I'm not, people saw me, I was at the US Open the other night. Sometimes people think I'm not a human or something, but I'm not emotive 'cause I don't cry. You know, there's other people crying all the time in public or on their programs or whatever. And I don't judge that, God bless everyone by the way. You know, like Kim will cry, you know, and I like, that's good. He doesn't. But, you know, so my sympathy here is reserved for the mother. And I'm very happy that there are hundreds of people supporting her and demanding that she be acquitted. Some of them, let me read something on threads that was pulled up by a dating coach. I'm not gonna say what her handle is. Let's, we'll blur that out. So by the way, this is the only lot I was searching for a logical response to all of this. Now obviously, I'm well versed in mental illness. My mother was mentally ill. I'm aware that mental illness is incredibly real thing and that it causes people to do horrible things and whatnot. But this person summed this up better than I ever could. And I just, this is why I go to social media because I mean, you just find some diamonds in the rough. Here is my hope for Lindsay. He says the dating, some dating coach on threads. Here is my hope for Lindsay Clancy, a female dating coach, which I also love that she has found not guilty is given mad management that allows her to return to normal life outside of a hospital and that she is allowed to do so. That she can find some peace in her heart, find real love and build a family if she still wants to. I think that's lovely. All of that was stolen from her. I mean, that's profound. No, that's actually profound. I like that idea. Maybe there's a show on TLC with Lindsay Clancy called second, second chances where they follow her around. So, so here's what's interesting. Not so much, listen, could did this one lose your mind and kill her kids? Yeah, is that tragic? Yes. There's something interesting to me that this has become such a rallying call for people. And one wonders some of the discourse around the case, there's a little disturbing. I'm disturbed by the fact there are some people that still want to blame the mother. It's like crazy. Some of these sick people, largely men and some women, like the prosecutor who's a woman, they want to blame this woman for killing her children. And I just, I can't even understand why how your mind would get there. You know what I mean? I don't understand how your mind would get there. But can we have a, can we, let's get another take up from Threads because the Threads takes have been spot on. Exactly what we need. Did I send you the other one? Not yet, I don't think so. I didn't. Okay, hold on, let me send you the other one. I found another one that is equally charming. So now there's a look, can you get something up about the rallying, this has become a rallying cry for a lot of women who have showed up. I think rightly to support this woman. And there's, they have signs and they're all wearing pink and this is, by the way, this is very exciting. In a world where women are forced to constantly compete with each other, for the male gaze, I think there's something really nice about an incident like this, bringing people together and let's, let's show this is not just negative. Let me send you this take because this was a, maybe I'll just read it from my phone. How high tech am I? But this take was a real special, another special one because Threads has the best takes on this. It has the absolute, I've got a new theory on the Lindsey Clancy trial. I think Patrick, this is Lindsey's husband. I think he attempted to murder Lindsey first and the children saw it. So he had to kill them to get rid of the only witnesses. I think this is pretty, I think this is pretty good. And you might wonder why is this, how does this person know so much? I was in a group project in abnormal psychology where we were assigned a project to study and do a presentation about mothers that killed their children. We titled it murdering mothers. One girl in our group chose to spice it up a bit and did hers on a father that killed his entire family. This is all to say I've studied these cases extensively and nothing about this case points to her killing her kids. Everything about this case leaves me to believe Patrick was trying to kill them all and Lindsey survived. Well, by the way, finally someone who has the gods to kind of say what we've all been thinking. And this person did a project in college. So obviously they have the credibility here to kind of open our eyes to the idea that it was most likely the father. I mean, the defense attorney hasn't gone that route nor Lindsey, Lindsey hasn't really either. So let's watch this again because by the way this is and people think I'm gonna, people are gonna go, oh, this is the whole thing sarcastic. Show how little you know me because this is beautiful. I see a sea of pink and the women are together and they're clapping their hands and this is this Lindsey, the accused murderist being brought into the court. Yes. And there's clapping here too. Not this is a sad solemn moment and a horrible thing that a woman was, that she was given the wrong medication or overmedicated or had a psychic break and did a horrible thing. And this is all, this is all a horrible thing that we should be solemn and sad. That's one way to look at it. I don't love that. I prefer what these ladies have done, which is really kind of
show people that something really positive can come out of this. So there's a lot of clapping and yelling and it's sort of happy and I like that attitude. And I got to be honest, everyone keeps talking about the three dead currents. And to me, it's a little bit of a downer. I don't love, I had to a little bit of a downer. So here again is Lindsey Clancy is the accused of murdering her three children is going to throngs of people applauding and they're all just happy to be there. And it's exciting. Let's take it away. An astounding show of support today for Lindsey Clancy, hundreds of women all dressed in pink cheered the accused mom as she arrives in a police caravan for her murder trial. Yes. Supporters ran across the field to greet Lindsey. Thank God. And with their babies, yes, they held up stop it because I just want to highlight how beautiful this is for the people at home not getting it. Or they're accusing me of doing some type of bit. Women, there's a woman accused of murdering her three children with exercise ties. I, those are the things that I sometimes my trainer and I like, well, I haven't seen in months, I'm going to get back to see but I would do that. I would do that. He would go do it. And I would always say to him, do you think they'll snap because I was trying to, you know, you get it, try to get out of the exercise like, is it safe? But that's what it, is that what they mean? Those things, right? Put some tent, I try to do it quick, but you have to do it really, right. So Lindsey Clancy is accused of murdering her three children by strangling them with those things. Those women, I mean, people get down on Americans in terms of our character, but these women show up to support her with their children. That's pretty beautiful. You know, it's like going to support OJ and taking a girl from with a black eye. I, you know, there's something really nice about a bunch of women saying, just because you killed your children, you're, you're still a mother. You're a still mother and, and are you the perfect mom? No, who is, who is? So a lot of women here showed up with their children, a beautiful fact that I can't get passed and I just want to say, I want to take a moment to just comment on the health of our society. The state of our union is strong. And it's, it's kind of if, if I had my glasses off, you'd be, you'd see me crying. Let's continue watching this because again, it keeps getting better. It's so beautiful. I, is this something where they spring around a jail? Do they break her out of prison? Do they charge the, do they kill the cops? Wouldn't it be like a Thelma and Louise? Do they kill the cops and break Lindsay Clancy out of jail? I mean, who knows? The sky's the limit. Let's continue this here. They held up hearthands during a silent rally for the mom who strangled her three young children, then jumped from the second floor window, leaving her paralyzed for life. It's a, by the way, it's the ultimate kind of people are going to deeply criticize me for this. And I, and I'm, one of the things I'm never afraid of is taking a stand here because I do believe this is kind of a, like, it's kind of a feminist hero to, to just throw off the shackles of domestication in the way that she did. I know the killing seems a little extreme in hindsight, but to throw off the shackles of domestication in the way that she did and kind of challenge the patriarchy, the symbolism of killing them in the basement, but then rising like a phoenix to the top level of the house and then throwing yourself out of the window as a way to kind of break the chains of sort of that capitalist expectation, the weight, you know, that we place on women. The ability to kind of do that, to me, suggest sort of this kind of heroic, you know, and again, parts of, I know parts of it are sad. I don't think those are the ones we should focus on. I, I am, I'm putting myself in the heads of these women who have shown up in pink shirts who are standing by the caution tape by the tree with their children, women in the pink shirts by the caution tape, standing by the tree with their children, and they're supporting and they're demanding that she be released from jail. These are the people who wanted Donald Trump to go to Joe for inflating the price of a condo. Now I, I have got my, I got real problems with Trump. So he could go to Joe for a lot of other things at this point, illegal war, it's crypto, whatever. It's not a defensive Trump. But let's watch a little bit more of this because again, I, I feel a little left out of it. I want to be involved and even though it's a man and I think gender is really not super important. It is fluid. I do, I want to identify as this kind of woman. Like I'm not a big business gal who's going to go like start a yogurt company and be like breaking down the door and everything. I'm not that lady. I don't know that I'm like the nurturing mommy type. I don't think that kind of woman. I think I am pink sweatshirt here on the murderer woman. Let's watch a little bit more of this Fox News legal analyst, Chandler painter, a former prosecutor. Chandler painter. Hold on. What is that her name? Chandler painter. All right. God. There are a former prosecutor actually wore pink in her live report as she spoke to Lindsay's defense attorney. Oh my God. Yeah. With cheers. Hey guys. What do you think of the support for Lindsay out here? I have no words. Yeah. Yeah. Amazing. It's amazing. It echoes last year's free Karen Reed campaign. Yes. No supporters. Also wore pink. Yes. She was acquitted of murdering her cop boyfriend. Right. The rally for Lindsay Clancy is not just in Plymouth, Massachusetts where the trial is being held. Gatherings across the USA today, including here in New York in New York. Stop. I was worried this was just local. I hope people with their children are all rallying together for this woman. I think it's really important to really to really understand what a moment this is for all of us. We find our heroes in unlikely places and I do think by shedding light on this as unlikely as it may seem, not unlikely to me, but there's a lot of sick people out there that want this woman to go to jail or something. I do think we've found an unlikely hero. I do believe that and I believe that this woman should be let out of jail and allowed to do anything she wants. Sitting and I'm sorry, now I'm going to get in trouble, including kill more children. No, I'm, I'm serious. I am serious right now. If this woman gets out of jail and deems it appropriate to kill more, I, I think it, listen, I'm not going to be the one casting judgment on her. Because this is an amazing moment. All right, let's get her out of here. Lindsay Clancy, everyone, friend of the show. This is a woman theme show this week, okay? And I'd like to highlight this next story because I'm, right now I'm, this is for the women this show, American woman converted to Islam and plan terror attack on New York Capitol building. This again is another example of heroism. This, this is for the ladies this, this week. We have more women listening now than who've ever listened and we beat up on the men a lot Trump and cash Patel and, and, and, and, and, and a little fat face vans. It's kind of fat face, doesn't it? But the point is this, we, we, we, we, and we elevate the men sometimes and, but we need to elevate women who are doing things that I think are worthy of recognition. And this is another one of these things, you know, this is an American woman. She is converted to Islam as we all will matter of time. She planned attack on the New York Capitol building in Albany, right?
is not that one. Yeah. Number one, who cares? By the way, I'm with you, sister. Um, so let's, let's watch a little bit of this because again, it's another, this is another story that I just like because it just, it shows, you know, a lot of people, a lot of people, myself, include to get lost in a trap of negativity. Uh, oh, hey, I was going to replace people. Sure, but you know what? While we have them, while we have the human, I'm a little sick of like, the human race is going away by 2030, by 2027, all these click beta, while we have the human race, let's appreciate them. So now this woman, we don't know her name, but we do know she was planning a terror attack on the Capitol building in Albany, which by the way is, is long past you and I, and I'm happy and I only wish she had more support. Um, but here she is. Let's hear a little bit about this lady. These are the images of the woman federal prosecutors say planned to detonate a bomb at the New York State Capitol, wearing all black clothing covering her face. The government says 35-year-old Jessica Bowie was surveilling the building in July here and later seen at a home depot in early August, buying materials, including a large bin of nails for an explosive device that undercover agents pretended to assemble for her before meeting with Bowie and arresting the suspect. By the way, it's time for a minute. It's going to be so easy for overweight people to do the burqa, like I have to stop myself from getting in a burqa all the time. It seems so comfortable, like just a free flowing garment. Um, so this woman Jessica Bowie, who's, um, you know, she's not to what you would call a model, neither am I. Okay. Before you make that comment, well, are you a model? No. Good one. Jessica Bowie, uh, was trying to kind of go in there with a bomb and and bomb the, um, the Capitol building in Albany and she got fucking arrested. But let's hear a little bit more of this. It was, uh, another story of a kind of someone being thwarted before meeting with Bowie and arresting the suspect for supporting terrorism. Make no mistake about it. Miss Bowie's alleged plot was serious. According to a charging document, Bowie converted to Islam five years ago using the name Aisha Saif, but started making threatening anti-American posts on social media in recent months, including that's not connected. Stop it. That's not connected. The conversion to Islam taking the new name and then making posts on social media that are anti-American threatening violence. It's a little gross to imply that there's any any correlation between those independent events that are cooperated and that are happening completely independently of each other separately. And I think the way they said it, it seems like there might be some, but keep going because again, it, um, I, I talked about this on the Patreon. Recently, there's obviously a certain group of people that are just going to become extremist Muslims. There's, we love Muslims. They're lovely people. Choose a great, you know, Christians, Hindus, you know, Scientologists. As long as we, we, we don't start the killing. And, and we love all and all of us, really. But there are going to be a certain group of people that do, you know, they go to the extremist view of the ideology, which is why we should all kind of just be aware of the fact that like if we import different groups of people, there's going to be a percentage of each group that seems, is deeply committed to their faith in a way that might make us uncomfortable. Okay. And that's just nothing. That's either here or there. You know, that you might think, well, we'll just turn everybody into, you know, the modern American, like a childless woman would a pink sweatshirt, a plotting murderer by the caution tape at the courthouse. It seems lovely. But some people will not opt for that. They will opt for another thing, neither, neither extreme, which is good. Um, you know, so that's just, I'm just using this still way to make a geopolitical point that I'm actually quite bored of making. Um, but, um, so let's continue this because she's an overweight woman in America. That's first and that ain't easy. I've been an overweight woman in this country and you're lucky. I don't have a bomb. You're lucky. It ain't easy. Now, you might say to yourself, being overweight in America seems kind of easy. We've got five food delivery things, every five feet. There's a drive through. Some of it's easy. There's 19 kinds of Oreos. You might say to yourself, it's gotten easier. You might say to yourself, that the, uh, you know, uh, here's how easy it is to be overweight in America. People are dying from lettuce. Now that's how easy it, but being overweight's tough, you know, you feel it. You feel it when you're overweight. It's true. I always judge by this. I fit in the seat at the US open. Is it the easiest fit? No, I fit right in it. I fit right in a Broadway seat. I go to Broadway all the time. I could go. I fit in the seat. Um, you know, and I, but, but this, this, this woman and other people, like, I think she's, she's in the category of people that are out of the seat. She's out of the seat. So she's into the burger and she's was trying to bomb the Capitol in Albany. Um, because, and I don't know if this is related, but she could have been bombing them as a protest because she, she wanted to, that area to get zoned and have like a famous Dave's or something. I don't know what, why she did this. Um, let's, let's watch a little bit more of it. I want to get to know her. Do we get to know her? Praise beat to a law for September 11th. Miss Bowie, swore her allegiance to ISIS through multiple audio recordings. That prompted undercover FBI agents to exchange messages with Bowie, who they say plan to use a delay. Stop it for a minute. You don't look great fat at the Berkha. You see that? You don't look great that big in the Berkha. You'd think a, a Berkha that big would hide a multitude of sins, but it actually doesn't. You actually look bad. You look really bad. You just look like a big garbage bag. You look like a big holiday garbage bag the day after Christmas morning holding an iPhone. To transport the explosive device. Tell me that in writing. What kind of bag does she use? Dave plan to use a delivery door dash back to transport the, this is the fattest example of terrorism in this country. This fat bitch was using a door dash bag, an insulated door dash bag to walk you to the Capitol with a bomb. I mean, how far they've fallen. Can you imagine from 9/11 to this? No one in our country is thriving. So device telling them in writing, I want to destroy as much of the building as possible and kill the senators while they're meeting Bowie has not yet entered a plea. But according to the document told authorities she knew about the possible terrorism. I actually updated that she did enter a plea and the her plea right now is medium rare. I, I actually have it from this that she did enter a plea and it's medium rare for all those people in your cars who may have missed that. Let's, let's a little bit more of this possible terrorism charges. I already googled it before. I know I'm going to jail. Sam Brock and BC news. New York. She's not going to like the food in jail. She's not going to like that. The CIA director makes secretive visit to Moscow, although it wasn't really secretive because he landed in like a military plane and everyone knew he was there. So it's not secretive. And I guess he didn't meet with Putin, but supposedly told him not to attack NATO's territory, which I don't know that Putin's going to do. I don't think he will attack NATO territory, but what the hell do I know? The director of the CIA warned Vladimir Putin against an attack on NATO and a secret visit to Moscow this week, a recent US intelligence assessment had suggested that Russia could strike NATO's eastern flank within weeks to test the alliances result. I mean, are losing this Iran war is not good. Everybody is going
bro, you guys can't win that. So Putin's like, Europe is giving Ukraine weapons that they are using to hit targets in Russia. It has become a full on proxy war and it kind of has been since the beginning. Putin is eventually going to go listen. I'm going to take some type of action against the people who keep arming the Ukraine. And I don't hear the thing. Obviously we want this to end, but this is it. We're on a little bit of a suicide mission with Russia. And we've, we've got a lot of people killed here. We've constantly told the Ukraine not to negotiate. We've told the Ukraine that we were going to continually fund them and provide them with weapons and intelligence so that they could fight Russia. This has resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people on both sides. People have been maimed. Large swaths of Ukrainian cities have been destroyed, infrastructure, energy grids, things like that. Russia's, there's been a lot of damage in Russia. And I think now Putin is basically at, you know, the end of the rope, because the way things work in Russia is this. Putin right now appears weak. We are, we've engineered that to a degree. This war would have been pretty quick without Western intervention. Not saying what Putin did was good. I'm just saying what we've done is we have now pushed Putin into this corner where he appears to be weak in front of his country. He appears like he's lost the war and now he will, can either result, he resort to either like using a nuclear weapon, a tactical new, can I write in a, in Ukraine, or you can attack energy infrastructure, cyber attacks, whatever, or real attack. Trump is in a very similar position in Iran. Trump looks weak. Trump has done nothing but threatened. They'll be, they'll be an economic day if you support Iran for China for Russia. And then the next day goes, well, you know, you can give them some stuff. You can supply some stuff to them if you have to. I got it. Trump looks weak. Putin looks weak and people that have no way out of a conflict without wearing it, wearing that defeat are inevitably, there's at least part of his brain and this part of Putin's brain that's going, should I just launch a nuke. Now, I think hopefully the, the part of their brain that is, you know, rational, not that that's an irrational thought. It's an evil thought to kill a bunch of people, the nuclear weapon. But hopefully there's a part of their brain that's stopping them from doing that. But there's part of Putin's brain that goes, maybe we'll use a nuke because if we lose this war, the Western powers have already kind of declared that they're going to continually help the Ukraine and that eventually, now, Putin, you can agree with, disagree with him. Putin thinks Western meddling in the Ukraine is an existential threat to Russia. And that eventually, the forces that have, you know, manipulated to a degree, events in the Ukraine will manipulate them in Russia. And you might go, that's paranoid. He's stupid or they should manipulate the forces in Russia. And Russia should be whatever your opinion is. Great. Russia has got a lot of nuclear weapons. And the guy that runs it is convinced that the, the integrity of his country, the territorial integrity of it is threatened by a Western presence in the Ukraine, a, a, a, a pro-Western leader in the Ukraine. Certainly Ukraine getting in a NATO weapon systems that are in the Ukraine with an ability to potentially hit Moscow or whatever. So there's part of them. Vladimir Putin, part of them goes, hey, hey, I might just have to use a nuclear weapon. I don't know what to do. I don't know what else to do. Very much like Donald Trump, who said, that's why these wars are scary because we've lost the war. If we were winning the war, if Putin was like clear cut the winner of the war, it nobody would be worried that he would use a nuke. If we had won the Iran war, nobody would be worried that like Trump would use it. It's, we are losing. We've kind of lost. We've lost the Iran war. So everyone now, I think China now is probably looking at Taiwan and salivating like we've kind of showed our ass here on, on in many ways, on many levels. And we were basically like, hey, we're the world's military super power. Don't fuck with us. And now we can't win the war in Iran. We, we, so we've, so now the only thing you can lodge in the only like logical explanation for that is that. And again, we're never blaming the men and women who are fighting, but either the strategy is outdated. We got out maneuvered. We were outsmarted. We don't have the weaponry that we thought we had or for whatever reason we can't use it. Whatever the case may be, there's no way to spin this into a win. And I think Putin is having that trouble in Russia. He cannot spin this into a win. And he looks weak and weakness in Russia is usually penalized. And usually strength in Russia is what is the eventual victor will be who is seen as strong and capable. You know, it's not necessarily the person who promises to you're going to have a democracy or that there's going to be, you know, transparency and they're going to root out the corruption. I mean, some of that plays into it. But it's somebody who goes, I am strong. This person is weak. I will protect the country. This person will not. This person has put us in a position that makes us weaker. I will put us in a position that makes us stronger. So Putin is ready kind of paranoid about coups, obviously losing a war, having an economic situation, what, you know, they're having right now. There are economies pretty resilient. But it's really starting now to crack as ours is. By the way, isn't funny. Like anything you could say about them, you could say it about us really. So I don't know what the hell the CIA director went over there to say. Do you think he went over there to say, listen, we just tried this. I'm telling you, I'm telling you, we are, we're also fucked. We fit, you know, we, we tried a similar thing here and it didn't work. And you know, there's nothing we can really do. Seeking to downplay, downplay his spy chiefs visit the president said the Trump, the trip was semi routine. You know, Trump basically came out was like, listen, this guy sees his counterpart in Russia every year or so, they have a good relationship. Spy chiefs meet, they chat, they talk about stuff. What do you want to do? Um, the last time he visited Moscow, the CIA director was in November, 2021, when William Burns worn Russia against attacking Kiev, Putin launched a full scale invasion of his neighbor. A few weeks later, these, these visits don't seem to get the results somebody would want. Yeah, I mean, we're all just kind of waiting. Everybody's, you know, waiting and watching here and we hope that cooler heads prevail and that we don't slide into World War three. Because I don't know how confident I am. We're going to come out on top. That's one of the other probably. It's like, I don't know. Are we going to win that? You always thought, oh, there'll be a lot of destruction, but then we emerge the victor. I don't know. I don't know about that. Sighting three people inside the Kremlin, the agency said one option under consideration was to intensify powerful ballistic missile attacks on Kiev, including the center of Ukraine's capital, as well as infrastructure sites in other cities. The load of mirrors, the Lensky forces have increasingly targeted Russian oil facilities and warehouses run by large online retailers to put pressure on Russia's economy. Putin increasingly views these strikes as attacks by NATO states. Well, they are. I mean, like, let's be honest, we're
giving them the intelligence, the weapon, read the money, you know, hey, listen, it is what it is. Like if Russia feels, if Putin feels that all is lost, there's a very good chance. He uses a tactical nuke or, you know, a campaign of bombing that's just so unbelievable. Like it, no one's seen anything like it. Um, you know, so we'll have to, we'll monitor that. We'll keep that. I mean, this has been going on for so long. And one hope, but this has been my opinion from the beginning is like, why would you push everyone here into these boxes? This does seem to be the, the, the, the place to be. I do want to highlight another woman. There were no women in that story and that bother me. Senator Darlene Graham, who again, is a American hero in my estimation for, for, for immediately stepping up and filling her brother Lindsey Graham Senate seat. Um, she is a capable woman, a very smart woman, a very smart woman. Um, and she's kind of, she's kind of brilliant. And again, I just want to take time and just kind of appreciate this. They ask her a very difficult question about Taiwan and the South China Sea. She was asked this question about, you know, is it in our national security interests to like protect Taiwan or something? You'll hear the question in a minute and listen to her response. It's pretty genius. She said, this is darling and now by the way, after this response, she won the people of South Carolina said, that's our girl. After this response, they said, that's who we want in the Senate, the United States Senate, the people of South Carolina heard this answer and said, put her in the Senate. Here she is, darling Graham, national security questions. Well, um, Senator are Taiwan and the South China Sea national security issues for the United States. If so, why? Now, stop it for a minute. Here's the answer I would have off the top of my head if I were darling Graham. I would say something like, I would say something like this. Okay. This is what I would say. I would say, thank you, Greta high level Scientologist Greta Van Souscher. I believe she is. She is palsy. The faith doesn't move the face, which I like poker face. What I would say is, well, thank you, Greta. Um, obviously the, uh, sovereignty of Taiwan remains a concern. I do think it is in the national security interests of the United States of America to have a constructive partnership with China, as well as Taiwan. And I think there are times when our opinions are going to differ. And certainly on the autonomy of Taiwan, there is, there is a difference there. Clearly, we have economic relationships in Taiwan. We have political relationships. Um, I don't comment on military strategy. I'm not in the military. But I would say that we also are never, we've never officially deviated from that one China policy where we do recognize that, you know, Taiwan would be in, you know, we, we understand the way China's claim to Taiwan and our, our, our policy officially does not deviate from that. But we do recognize that Taiwan is an independently governed autonomous country. And we hope China would respect that, uh, in all of this, whatever, some version of that, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Now you would think someone in a hotel room in South Kakalaki would have, uh, handed or a couple of index cards. That's what you do when you do debate prep, take a couple of index cards, a couple of index cards, but hey, say something about, you know, economic partnerships. We think it's important that we, you know, there are times, uh, you know, you do to the, uh, interconnected nature of the world. These questions, uh, are difficult, but they aren't national security. I think all of these questions have elements of, uh, national security embedded in them. Semiconductors, chips, just like listening to you don't really even need to know what does what? You know, semiconductors and chips and, you know, putting, putting some controls on what imports can go to other countries. We have to consider our national security when we think about any of this credit, any of that index card, quick, quick, get the index card. So now is, this is after I guess some level of debate prep. This was the best answer that they went with here. This is the, uh, after again, there's got to be debate prep. I imagine there's some prep happening like this is on television, she's a famous senator's sister that senator has, uh, was killed probably by Russia. And she's asked a question, which is not like a got your crazy question. It's about Taiwan. It's about China. It's about the South China Sea. Is the South China Sea a national security interest? Well, you know, Greta, thank you very much for that thoughtful question. I think that all over our world, there are, there are tension points. Um, and, and as, uh, as the United States of America, we need to make sure that our policies are first and foremost good for Americans, but also good to advance the values that we believe are essential around the world. Freedom, open markets, whatever. Give that dumb neocon answer, whatever. Any, no, answer us. Any, no, about you, she could have just started listing things. Chips and semi conductors and the South China Sea and Taiwan and China and freedom and little bit of kittens. Greta, it's all our national security. It's everything. You know, she could have quoted the law in Hillsong Greta, everything is everything. What is meant to be will be any answer she could have given. This is, it's the South Carolina Senate debate. She could have done gobbledygook. She could have quoted Exodus or Janet's any book out of the Bible, Deuteronomy, whatever. She could have done any of that memorized a few key words, a few phrases, not even full sentences, sentence fragments, strung together, anything. Here was the answer. Our preparation that they decided to go with. Here, here she is, Darlene Graham. I'm sorry. Could you repeat the question? Our Taiwan and the South China Sea national security issues for the United States and if so, why or how? I'm just going to be honest here. I'm not a national security that I'm not that informed on national security. So, but I do support the military. My brother was in the Air Force for 33 years. So I will do everything I can to support the military. My dad was in the army. I'm not a polished politician up here. I'm national security is not. I'm an idiot. I'm retarded. Not my area of expertise, but I do support the military. I'm a retard who will be who will be used as a vessel for the military industrial complex to get everyone killed. That's exactly what I have. I have no idea what's going to. I could not be bothered to memorize a three sentence answer in the fucking South Carolina Hyatt Regency. I couldn't be bothered to do it. I'm a literal moron who doesn't know what the South China Sea is. I have no idea what's going on. And she won. And she won. Because down deep in our country, we like knowing the politicians don't pull the strings. That's what my is really what I think. We all kind of like knowing that because we hate these people, but we also like that they don't have any power. We claim we don't. We claim we don't like it, but we kind of like we go, she don't run nothing. We like that there's rooms full of people and suits killing people and making the decisions. We maybe we fantasize will be in those rooms or gives us something fun to talk about, but we've never demanded competence from these people. We don't demand that they're even remotely honest or like that they can read in this case. We don't, I mean, look at her fate. Look at that face just in this. They we do not care. We claim to care, but we could care less that this woman literally says a very basic question that any 10th grader in a global history class could answer that was like paying attention. Any community college debate student would have been able to answer this question. This woman is a senator and and literally said without shame, I'm not informed on national security. That's not what I do. I talk about my gay brother and my father and you know what I'm saying?
They were in the military and my brother was in the military and maybe Lindsey wasn't in the military. Maybe it was another one of her brothers. I don't know. My brother was in the military and I went on his computer and he had all these videos of military man and some of them were undercover dressed as women because they were doing that for our country and I said Lindsey, why are some of these man dressed as women? He said, "Darlin, they're spies, they're spies." And I said, "Why do they have their clothes off if they're spies?" He goes because sometimes that's what spies have to do for their country and they did. And I was just so impressed by him and he said he had to watch all those types to make sure those spies were doing the good job. That's how much he cared about our country. Yeah. I mean, she won. After that answer, she won. People saw that and went, "We don't care that it's fake. We actually liked that it's fake. We prefer it to be fake." That's the answer there. They go, "It's not real. We don't want it to be real. We would prefer whatever's going on, whatever the deep stated, that we would rather that. We'll just elect her. It's fake." When you elect her, here's what you know. You know it's fake and you don't want it to be real and there's no illusion that it's real. So that's kind of why I like, I respect them electing her. They go, "We don't even, it's like electing my cat, Albert, the kitten." You know, it's not even close to being real and this is just such an in your face. Example, if you go, "Might as well give it to her. Might as well give it to the woman who goes, "I just don't credit. I'll be honest with you. I don't know. I don't know what China is. I like Chinese food. I've been to Chinese restaurants and I went with lazy ones and lazy. He forgot to tip one of the Chinese waiters, real skinny Chinese waiter. And then lazy went and gave him, I think it was $400 in the back of the restaurant. And then they had a nice talk, maybe it was the 20 minutes or he was back there and he said he was helping that boy pay his rent. But I don't know about China, but I know lazy used to go to the Chinese restaurant and give money to this real skinny looking boy there in the back. And I said, "Lancy, you're too generous." And he said, "Darling, now don't tell nobody this." He didn't want anyone to know how generous he was with his money. And I respect that. But other than that, I just don't know what China is. I don't know what you want her. By the way, if you, you want her on the jury, if you killed three of your kids. I don't know why she did it. They're saying it's that she's actually good, maybe I don't know. I've never killed my kids, but there's the first time for everything. I will say about Lindsey Clancy, what are they going to have this verdict? I know they did their closing arguments today. Closing arguments today. The verdict is coming soon, so here's what I will say. I just hope, can we get, see, we got fucked with one of our episodes for music. Can we find some copyright-free music? Please. Because I'm, what can we find that's copyright-free that's celebratory? Let me look for something. Because ears of thing folks, they come at us with this music all the time, even if I'm singing a song. I sang a song only briefly and people got really mad at us. But I do want to find sort of a celebratory reason, because I do think if she's acquitted, and by the way, it's the only correct answer is to acquit her and to charge her husband, actually. But if she is acquitted and her husband is charged, I would like sort of a celebration celebratory vibe. So the courthouse, I know that there will be, and I just hope, and a lot of people bring in their kids. I hope they have bouncy castles for the kids and the jungle gyms. I hope they do court sort of a carnival festival atmosphere for the kids. A lot of women are bringing their children to this woman's murder trial, and I just hope that we have fun stuff for the kids face painting, you know, whatever, you know, whatever fun, because it's a real family environment there in the outside of that courthouse. Not in the courthouse, it's not so much a family environment because she killed her children. But outside of the courthouse, it is one of those family kind of fun things. And is there anything that we won't get thrown off YouTube for playing? Okay. This is celebration, tough, that's okay, it's copyright free. And we just picture the scene, she's acquitted, of course, and she comes out, and the women are like swaying, and they're clapping, and everybody's cheering and screaming. It's like kind of a tea swift, concert, it's like a Taylor Swift concert, it's like the eras tour. This is really what it is, right? It's like the eras tour, it's like the eras tour, and everybody's just kind of grooving back and forth and enjoying themselves, and Lindsay's out, and she's just free, she's free, and then she's on the circuit, she's on Mel Robbins, she's on Kohler Daddy, she's on the few, she's got a new lease on life, there she's approached about doing a reality show, she's a young sexy single with a checkered past, she speaks to the importance of listening to women, God, I love her. And I love her, there's something wrong with me for love and her. If love and her is right, I don't want to be wrong. If you don't see this as a beautiful time in our society to kill your children, there's never going to be a better time to kill your kids. There will never be a, you used to be accused of witchcraft for doing stuff like this, now people have matching shirts on, and they clap when you go to the courthouse, there will never be a better time to kill your children, folks, unless you're a man, then you don't do it, you have no reason to, but if you're a lady out there and you just want to start killing your kids, 2026 is the time to do it, sachet your sexy ass down to the basement and choke your children, baby, that's right. sachet your sexy ass down to the basement and choke your children, because there's going to be a lot of mommies that are out there singing and dancing for you. It's your world, you're the author of your own story, ladies, don't let anybody stop you. Good night.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
The host criticizes the current relationship with nature, arguing that humanity must actively control weather patterns through science rather than live in harmony with nature.
The speaker expresses strong skepticism about the idea that climate change is solely due to human dominance, suggesting that controlled weather manipulation is both necessary and achievable.
The Lindsay Clancy case is presented as a complex tragedy involving postpartum psychosis, with the defense claiming she acted under delusion from a voice in her head, while prosecutors argue for intentional murder.
A significant public rally of women in pink supports Clancy, symbolizing solidarity, challenging patriarchal norms, and affirming maternal identity despite the horrific act.
The host highlights the irony and societal shift in how such tragic cases are perceived, noting that public support for Clancy reflects a broader feminist and emotional response to women's struggles.
A subplot involves a woman, Jessica Bowie, planning a terrorist attack on the U.S. Capitol, which is framed as a cautionary tale about extremism, body image, and societal vulnerability.
The host contrasts the Clancy case with political figures like Senator Darlene Graham, praising her candid, unpolished response to national security questions as a symbol of authenticity and public distrust in elite power.
The overall tone is celebratory and subversive, framing the Clancy case as a moment of societal transformation where women unite across pain and politics to demand empathy and justice.
Summary:
The host of the Tim Dylan show delivers a provocative and emotionally charged analysis blending weather manipulation, mental health, and feminist activism. He argues that humanity must actively control nature, rejecting harmony with the environment, and expresses hope for technological mastery over storms and weather. Central to the discussion is the Lindsay Clancy trial, where a woman accused of strangling her three children is portrayed not just as a criminal but as a victim of postpartum psychosis and systemic neglect.
The host emphasizes the powerful public response—women in pink, holding signs and children, supporting Clancy as a symbol of maternal resilience and resistance against patriarchal expectations. He critiques societal judgment, highlighting how the case has become a rallying point for women to assert agency and empathy. The segment also briefly touches on a terrorism case involving Jessica Bowie, using it to underscore societal vulnerabilities, while contrasting it with the raw authenticity of Senator Darlene Graham’s unpolished, candid response to national security questions.
Ultimately, the host frames the Clancy case as a transformative moment in American culture—one where grief, feminism, and public solidarity converge, and where a woman’s trauma becomes a shared narrative of empowerment. The tone is celebratory, with the host imagining a joyful, carnival-like celebration if Clancy is acquitted, reflecting a deep belief in the power of collective emotional response to redefine justice and motherhood.
FAQs
The speaker argues that we must actively control the weather through science, rather than living in harmony with nature, as extreme weather events have become more frequent and dangerous. They believe humanity should dominate natural forces to prepare for and manage climate-related disasters.
The trial involves Lindsay Clancy, accused of strangling her three children with exercise bands. The prosecution claims she acted intentionally, while the defense argues she suffered from postpartum psychosis and was influenced by voices in her head.
Women are supporting her as a symbol of resistance against patriarchal expectations, seeing her actions as a dramatic break from traditional maternal roles. The support is also a form of solidarity, with many wearing pink and bringing their children to show unity and empathy.
The speaker acknowledges that mental illness, such as postpartum psychosis, can lead to tragic outcomes, but emphasizes the need to avoid blaming the mother and instead focus on understanding and supporting mental health struggles.
One theory suggests that Lindsay Clancy's husband may have attempted to kill her and the children, and that she survived by killing them to eliminate witnesses. This idea is presented as a possibility by someone with prior academic study in abnormal psychology.
The crowd's cheers and supportive actions—especially women in pink with their children—signal a shift in societal attitudes, showing solidarity and rejecting judgment, which the speaker sees as a positive sign for women’s empowerment and collective resistance.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.