#403 - “Pentagon Is On Red Alert” Mossad Just Declared as #1 Threat | Scott Horton

Perustin pyöräilyvää teitä valmistavan ornotin vuonna 2013. Mielestäni parasta Shopify saan se, että voimme harjoittaa liiketoimintaa ilman teknistä osaamista. Voimme hallinnoida yrityksen taustajaristeelle mien ja front-endia sekä myydä verkossa, vaivattaa. Jos Shopify olisi pyöräilyvaruste, sollisi mielestäni itse polkupyörä. Sillä asiat hoidetaan ja meidän liiketoiminta me hoituu Shopify-sa. Aloita ilmainen kokeilu Shopify piste.com-sivustolla. Täällä hyvän järjestelmässä, että olisi pyöräilyvarut. Täällä, että olisi pyöräilyvaruste, että olisi pyöräilyvaruste, että olisi pyöräilyvarut. Täällä, että olisi pyöräilyvarut. Täällä, että olisi pyöräilyvar. it and they were allowed to all get away with it because being government informants that means a bunch FBI agents would have to get in trouble for other prior knowledge that they didn't act on appropriately. And so they just buried that and made all that go away. But again, that kind of right-wing patriot conspiracy community already existed there. It pre-existed the Waco masker. It was huge after Waco. And then so soon as they started lying about Oklahoma City, the truth came out like within the first year, everybody knew like in the right-wing magazines where they had the names of the neo-Nazi bank robber group that had helped McVeigh with the thing and the rest of it. So, and then there was, you know, the massive cover-up. Was it McVeigh tied to Waco somehow? Well, he had been there. He was there. He was there like during the siege protesting against it. Okay. And, you know, obviously it was highly motivated by what happened there to do what he did. But just point being, not just that a bunch of guys, you know, helped him do it, but that their government let them get away with it. And the media let the government let them get away with it. In a way that like to me really reinforced the idea that there's some secret network of power here that we're not aware of. How can they get every newspaper editor in America to go along with this? It's just because they're lazy and stupid. Just because I was smarter than them as a kid doesn't mean that like they should have been smarter than me as guys older than me. Who's, well, if the ice says there is no John Doe too. So I guess we're over that. And they just threw on with their lives. A thousand foot view of the Oklahoma City thing without getting spending too much time. Like what was it all about? Well, it was like I know what happened, but like what was the whole conspiracy? I mean, there's a very big chance that it was deliberately provoked attack by, you know, undercover informants who wanted it to happen. A couple of them were not just informants, but were like agents provocateur involved in the thing. So, but then the idea, the easiest explanation is that it was a sting that went wrong, that FBI was supposed to swoop in and be heroes, but they just got outsmarted. And I think it's a proven fact where we know that there were two writer trucks. Essentially, the FBI was following one truck and they knew it, so they just brought in another truck and did the bombing with that one and outsmarted the feds and killed all the people. And then they covered it up. And, you know, they admitted, I mean, the US attorney who prosecuted the case admitted in an interview that he and all of his attorneys all agreed that they were letting it guilty people go free. They just didn't, their excuse was, they didn't want to jeopardize the death penalty case against McVeigh. Because if they had to admit that all these other neo-Nazi friends of his helped them do it, then that raises the question whether he was just the idiot driving the truck and they were the ones who really did it and they didn't want to cast reasonable doubt on his guilt. They had to get his scout. And so we can either give everybody life where we can give one guy death. So we're going to do that. And that's their excuse. That's their official excuse for letting the guilty go free. It's in the book, Oklahoma City by Gumball and Charles. Larry Mackie is the name of the federal prosecutor who admitted that to them. So I heard that that building had a bunch of it was FBI headquarters, right? No, ATF. ATF. Okay, that's what it was. And secret service and agriculture department and all different, you know, government agencies in there. And there was a daycare center. So 20 children were killed in the thing. It was an absolute test. Maybe we'll have a call back, talk along the later in the show when we talk about Iran. But anyway, point being, that was why I was a conspiracy nut was because in the 90s, there was a lot of conspiracy stuff that was right, you know. And also, I was wrong about the one-world government thing. But by the time of W Bush came in and was launching Iraq war two, it was right around, it would have been, I guess, late '02, early '03 that I finally got it through my thick skull that like Colin Powell is not driving. And this is not about building up the United Nations at all. And in fact, it's clear that they had to drag Cheney kicking his cream and to get him to agree to even ask the UN for a resolution at all. They wanted to just go. And it was the British also insisted that they at least try to get to you in resolution to go. But the idea that they were essentially going to go after these rogue states in the interest of building up this baby blue global federal union thing was just obviously not right. You know, by the time of the invasion, at least I was over it. And you can just tell, like, you know, their whole and, you know, the Cheney regime, the W Bush, the Cheney government, their entire thing was that they're the rulers of the universe. Nobody can tell them anything. They have the national security council. They don't need the UN Security Council. And again, it was Powell who like made them go to the UN. But Bush and Cheney were like, I don't know if Cheney even ever agreed to it. But Bush was like reluctantly agreed to it. But anyway, my friends, the John Birchers, I really like these guys. They're great guys. In fact, one of their guys emailed me and we had a nice little phone call last week. So I really respect them. They're great people. They love the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and they're great guys. But just the one world government thing. That was the long answer to your question. That was what really got me interested in all the America's relationship with the rest of the world as being really the driving factor in determining the federal government's relationship with us here at home in the states that, you know, as long as we have a world empire, we're driving to suicide. So whether it's a deliberate conspiracy or not, this is how you destroy America as you overextend the damn thing and break it. And so that's clearly what's happening. So my same concerns weren't really laid. You know what I mean? It's like, yeah. Because in the John Birch theory, first they got to wreck America. Then the rest of the world will take it over one day. We'll just forget the second part. But they are wrecking America. And you can see why the Birchers think it's deliberate. How could you be the rulers of the most powerful nation state in the world and then just be a bunch of John McCain's and just drive the thing off the cliff and die and look what they've done in just the 30 years since the end of the Cold War at 35 years. They destroyed everything. You couldn't possibly have more irresponsible stewards of American power than the bushes, the Clintons, Biden and McCain and these just absolute scum Susan Collins who's supposed to be the correcting mechanism here. There isn't one. You know, it's Biden's all the way down. In fact, that's probably a good way to think of like our war with Russian Eastern Europe and our tear wars in the Middle East as well is just Joe Biden won the election of 88. The one where he was forced out for plagiarism or whatever. Joe Biden won in 88. He's been president this whole time. This has been the Biden regime this whole time. That's all it is. Have you tried buying something online? When suddenly you realize you have 25 tabs open from Reddit to Timu to Amazon. That was me recently shopping for new office chairs. One site says the chair is perfect. The other site says it sucks and then the other one says it destroys your back. And before you know it, you're comparing foam density like you work in a furniture lab, which is why I started using doop.com's research for me tool. You just type in what you're looking for like comfortable office chair for long recording days and doop does the research for you in just minutes. It filters through sources, compares options, breaks down features, specs, pricing, and gives you a straight answer on what to buy and why. And my favorite part is it tells you what not to buy so it can save you the trouble of making expensive mistakes. So instead of wasting your whole day, use doop. Be prepared to save yourself a ton of time and money. Just go to dup.com and tell you what you're looking to buy. That's dup.com to finally feel confident about what to buy. Who it really is behind it pulling the strings though. Like it can't be the presidents themselves, right? There has to be some other form of power behind it that's like making everything happen. Or I mean, I mean, it feels to me like there's like this hidden power structure that's like hidden in the shadows behind all this stuff. Well, you know, so that's the thing. And that was what I thought to. How do you get the editor of the Dallas Morning News to just pretend he's never heard of McVase friends before. Like what there must be a secret thing going on here. But that's not it. Like they're just lazy. It's stupid. And as far as like the actual, you know, the power mongers is really just comes down to, I believe, what Ross Perot called back in 1992, the special interests. And I remember asking my folks, what does that even mean? The special interests. And I don't know if they defined it very well for me, but I'll define it very well for you. The special interests are the bankers, the arms manufacturers, the oil man, agribusiness, and Israel, you know? Right. I mean, that's it. They're the ones who have the best steak in the game. Neocons, right? That's what the Neocon is. Well, the Neocons of the Israeli lobby, the Vanguard of the Israel lobby. Okay. And with their ties to the military industrial complex as well. But you have, you know, these different power factions with tens or hundreds of billions of dollars at stake in their role in the economy every year and all that. So they're all, you know, completely embedded with the national government and, and play a huge role in determining its policies. And the Israelis are no slouches in that. I save them till the end just kind of for effect or whatever. It should sound silly that a foreign government is one of the big lobbies in America over, I mean, if you'd never heard of such a thing, wouldn't you just assume that if a foreign government wants to talk to America, the ambassador's office is over there at the State Department. Go talk to him. Exactly. Right. What do you mean by lobbying our legislature? What do you mean by lobbying our state legislatures for Kentucky? Yeah. One of the poorest states in this country. Passing laws determining who Texans are allowed to boycott or not if they're going to have a contract with the state of any kind. And Texas isn't the only one. I mean, these guys are way out over their skis as far. I don't know if that's the right phrase for it. They're just, they're playing a role that they should not be playing in our society whatsoever. It sounds completely crazy. If If I tell you look, man, you know, Monsanto and Cargill and these, you know, gigantic, you know, archer Daniels Midland that these zillion dollar firms, lobby like hell in Washington, and it's all really corrupt, and they're stealing money from you, dude. You'd be like, okay, yeah, that sounds right, but these are American companies, tilling American soil, feeding Americans food, even if it's got roundup all over it or what, but like, at least we know who they are and what they're doing. Now, I don't like it at all when they're buying up, you know, wheat fields in Ukraine. I'm trying to enlist the government to protect their investments overseas. That's, you know, sickening, corrupt, bloody imperialism, but I just mean here, in fact, that's the kind of thing they do, you know, lobby for, but anyway, Israel ain't got really anything to do with America other than in the most artificial sense because of all of that lobbying. You know, they attach themselves to us when we don't get anything out of it at all. Except terrorist attacks and bankrupt budgets. - What do we, what do we get for them? Is there any way in your mind you could sort of reverse the argument on yourself or like steel man, the fact like what benefit do we get if, even if it's like a, almost nothing. - Well, they're gonna say like tech patents or whatever. - Tech patents. - I mean, not even patents, right? Tech innovations of whatever their companies do that. - Okay. I can't name a bunch of, you know, everyone's, I know that they, as James Bamford reported, that they provided the software to run the NSA's computers and got all their own backdoors in it. Doesn't sound like we're benefiting from that, you know? Which I don't know why they've even bothered 'cause Snowden leaked and Greenwald reported. They didn't put this in the post of the times, but they reported it in the Guardian that the NSA gives America's entire hall over to Israel every day. Everything, which is everything. So, yeah. If you look, if you take, I mean, what do the pro-Israel advocates say? They go, well, look, when Israel cashes a giant welfare check, it buys arms from American companies. So, you ought to feel great about that when, wait a minute, they stole that money from you, bounced it off Israel and gave it to one of your neighbors who makes bombs for a living. How's that benefit you? - Right. - It doesn't at all. And if you take, you know, the, whatever, roundup, I call it four billion a year of money that we put into welfare for them that they spend on American arms. That's still all a net loss. First of all, in being taxed from us anyway, we're being denied the capital to invest in our own lives. But then, at best, they're making a real fancy, super expensive piece of equipment to go and destroy lives and property with. And then throw it out when it's useless, you know? It's all, they're not providing goods and services to anyone. They're just completely just a net negative on everything. - Right, I wonder though, like, you know how, you know how in Terminator, when the dude, the guy who like turns into like the metal blob or whatever, he like loses a limb or whatever and then he like goes back and it melts back into his body. I'm like thinking of that, but it's like America and Israel. And I'm like, they are so rooted in our politics and our economics and everything here. At what point is it like this, is it even America anymore? This is more Israel than it is America. - Look, so, and this kind of goes back to control the people that make the most money, the people that are in all the power. Like, it's basically like, we're just sitting here talking about it, like, they can't control America anymore. We are Americans, right? But the people at the top layer, the people that control society and make all the money, they're all the same. They are Israel, like, they are part of Israel and they want it, they are working for Israel. So like, at what point does it become futile? - Yeah, I mean, that's one way to put it. Like, going back to like my younger conspiracy days, it was also posted about the skull and bones, right? The Anglo-American establishment, the pierces and the witness and the abits and the Rockefellers and the more even the Rockefellers were sort of white trash, late-comers, to all of that, skull and bone stuff. But all that's over, dude, right? Like, I know Bush, and this was part of it, too. The Bushes are skull and bones, John Kerry was skull and bones, whatever. That's like the very last gasp of that old wasp establishment, right? Like, they, they kind of blew their wad in Vietnam and have been, you know, there's, this is a point that Darryl Cooper, my co-host on our show, Provoked, has been making a lot lately, is that, like, say what you will about the bonesmen, they believe that this was their country, right? That they had a sense of, like, real pride and sense of responsibility of stewardship over it, which they got us into a couple of world wars and, you know, really sucked on a lot of things or whatever, but point being that really now, no one's in charge. It's just an imperial court that the Rockefeller's built this world empire and then lost control of it. Now, it's up for grabs, right? For the highest bidder, if UAE can pick up the bone, toss a little bit of money around and get a war in Yemen, then they'll do that. And there's no, there's no, you would think that this would be the role of the elected political establishment, but there's, they're not. I mean, they're there to take that call, you know what I mean? And in fact, like, that's a perfect example, really. You know, I just picked it at random was in 2015 when Muhammad bin Zayed of UAE and Muhammad bin Salman of Saudi Arabia, he had just become the defense minister 29 years old. They wanted to have a war in Yemen. And they, and this wouldn't Israel, it was them. And they came, the Saudis? Yeah, the Saudis and the Emirates. And they came to Obama and said, man, we want to bomb the hoothies. They just sacked the capital city and took over. This, the Shiites have taken over the capital city of Sinan now. And we won't stand for it, help us kill them. And Obama told them, okay, fine, green light. And they fought a war for what? Seven years, eight years really, I guess I ended beginning at 22, they finally called it off. So from 15 to 22, so seven years, they bombed the crap out of Yemen. And then causing excess deaths. This isn't, you know, direct violence. I think the direct violence was something like 75,000 or something. And then with the excess deaths of something like 300,000 people killed in this horrific war. And it was just because this guy, Mohammed bin Zayed of UAE, who most Americans have never heard of, called up his buddy, Mohammed bin Salman, who most Americans, at least at that time, had never heard of. This is before, you know, he was Crown Prince Bonesaw over there, you know, murder and Khashoggi and all that. Right. And that famous yet. And I just called up the Obama government and essentially enlisted America to fight a war for them. Because of course, it's our planes, it's our bombs, it's our, you know, contractors doing all the maintenance and the care and feeding of the planes and doing their traffic control and the mid air refueling. It's our war. As the Yemenis called it, the American Saudi war against us, like the Americans, you never even heard of it. The American people were never even consulted one bit about this. They just did it. They just announced a press release. This is happening. So the people that are in charge here just see dollar signs, the military district complex just sees money like bombs, machinery, we just ship it over there and we get to make a ton of money. That's, that's high level. I mean, I'm sure there's a lot more involved in that, but like to distill it down, that's at the end of the day. What? Yeah, look down to. You know, as any socialist would tell you, if the capitalist can buy a congressman and use political force to have his way and to seek rents and exploit the helpless, they'll do that. The libertarian's argument is, yeah, what are you going to do? Go full communism. You got a private property. You have to have prices. You have to have capitalism or you're dead. So we'll just have to get rid of the government then. That's the problem is that there's a Congress to pass a federal reserve act. There's a Congress to pass a declaration of war or authorization for the president to take our money and turn it into bombs and kill innocent people with it. We got to dismantle as much of that power as we possibly can because as Harry Brown said, it's not just the abuse of power, it's the power to abuse as long as it's there. And in the case of America, we're talking what already the budget, the official budget was $800 billion, but the real budget calculated by Winslow Wheeler is $1.5 trillion on the military that they're already spending. Now they want to bump the official number up to 1.5, which would put us over two. Isn't the interest like a trillion or something? Isn't the interest a lot? I don't remember the number right now, but I know that on the line graph, it's the biggest part of the budget, other than social security. It's more than Medicare, Medicaid, or the Pentagon budget. So the interest on the debt is more than even the cost of the entire world empire right now, at least on the official, the official number. Uh huh. Yeah. Yeah. And it's at 39 now. It's at almost 40 trillion. So think of, here's a way to think about that, Danny, would be that you take the income tax of not just Florida, but just take Florida, take the income tax paid by every single person in the state of Florida, all that money. It didn't go to help in some little lady in the hospital. It didn't go even to kill in some poor little kid in Palestine. That money just went to pay the interest on the debt to the Central Bank of South Korea. One third of everything people, every bit of their effort and blood, sweat, and tears, and you think of people who are, you know, doing real work for a living, manual labor, and bust in their asses and paying taxes through the nose, dude. And it's just our government just takes them. They might as well just be lightening it on fire in front of our face. Like a joke. This is crazy. It's so much, dude. You can't even quantify it. It's unbelievable the content that they have for us. U.S. interest payments reach one trillion. Yeah. Like a better analogy to what I was trying to say earlier is like, forget the terminator analogy. It's more like the signs of the lambs and the dude puts on the lady's skin. He's wearing your skin. It's like them. They're just wearing America's skin and they're acting like they're us. There's a lot of that, man. There's a lot of that. If you've shopped online before, chances are you've purchased from a business powered by Shopify. It's easy to spot by that purple shop pay button and that's what we use for our merch store. The purple button has all your payments and your shipping info, so you don't have to track down your card or hope your browser remembered your payment info. There's a reason why so many businesses use Shopify. And that's because they make it incredibly easy to run and manage your own business. Because it's the business behind the business that really matters. And that's where Shopify excels with convenient tools and workflows. Shop pay has the best converting checkout on the planet, meaning fewer band and carts and way more sales. That's a game changer. You could spread your brand's word with the built-in marketing and email tools. Don't want to build your own page, Shopify has hundreds of ready-to-go templates to easily express your brand and forget the code like daylight computer, which is gorgeous. So if you've got a dream, a product, and the drive to make it happen, Shopify has the platform that helps you do it with ease because businesses that sell sell more with Shopify. See less carts abandoned and more sales go with Shopify and their shop pay button. Find out for your $1 per month trial today at shopify.com/dannyjones all over case. Again, that's s-h-o-p-i-f-y.com/dannyjones shopify.com/dannyjones. Just look at it from the Israeli's point of view, okay? From the neo-conservatives point of view. They need America. What's Israel going to do without America? If you're the Israeli foreign ministry or whatever, and you have your list of priorities, why actually nothing else matters at all other than perpetuating your power and influence and increasing your power and influence in the United States. What if America turned their back on Israel and they had to fight all their own battles, pay all their own bills? They'd be in a much tougher position or at least, probably not. They'd at least have to rein in their insane ambitions. How about that? And so for them, it's everything, dude. How do they let these videos of, how does, how does, for Israel, for as competent as they are, as a, as, you know, their intelligence services, super competent, they're very good at controlling the most powerful nation in the world. How do they let all this shit leak out of like the Ben Gavir doing all this crazy shit, like celebrating about the gallows and then going in front, just, yes, I'll clip this morning of him saying, Oh, we're not going to let Trump do that. Like we're not going to let him get out of this war or whatever. We can't let that happen. And all the other stuff in tit like he's like intimidating those people as protesters that were like bent over. They look like Guantanamo prisoners like it's insane that they let this shit get out. Are they even like cameras into the room? Because they can see, I mean, it's not, it's not like, they're not, it's no secret all this stuff. It's, it's out of the bag more than ever now. Well, I think their control mostly comes from money and blackmail and intimidation, you know, whereas their, their public relations has always been extremely him handed because what can they do? It's a lie from morning till night, right? I mean, they're absolutely the aggressors, mass murdering and displacing the people whose property and whose country they're stealing. And so like, what are they going to do? To be honest, I mean, most of the time, it's, they're trying, like scrambling to come up with some line of bullshit to make it somehow seem plausible or whatever. So they're not practiced at really controlling the narrative that well there. Or at least, I guess maybe in the past, they were more effective at it. They'd have Frank Luntz do these, you know, focus groups and figure out exactly the right way to phrase things and stuff, but it's just, you know, with the last couple of years of war and that everybody's got a 3G, you know, cell phone camera and whatever. There's just so much footage of, of the abject cruelty of the Israeli regime that there's just no amount of spin that you can put on that. I mean, even that footage of Ben Gavir was like, somebody's got a camera in their pocket, right? That wasn't, I don't think, official like cameraman footage following him around is just, right. Everybody's got a camera and this stuff is just gets out. There's nothing they can do about it. It also may be, too, that there's at least a side of Israeli propaganda, which is go ahead and hate us then because that kind of serves, too, that like see the whole world is against us if it wasn't for us because remember, you know, all governments are based on the fear of their populace at the very least of the fear of that it would be worse if it wasn't us. It'd be somebody else and we're the ones keeping the somebody else away and all of that. Right. Remember in V for Vendetta, I want the people to remember why they need us, right? So in the Israeli government, it's the same thing. They have to tell their people all day that everyone in the world hates you. Everyone in the world wants to kill you if it wasn't for us, they would. Yeah. And that's why you're here and that's why you can't just go to Europe. Don't leave. Even if there's rockets in common from the North, don't get on a plane and go to France where you'd be perfectly safe and happy. Right. You've got to stay here because every non-Jew in the world wakes up in the morning thinking of only one thing getting his hands around your neck, you know what I mean? And they do tell their people that constantly. So then if they are, if their actual, you know, activities are driving people toward anti-Semitism or even more generally toward anti-Israel sentiments, then that's actually great ammunition for them too to tell their own people. See, I told you, they hate us, man. Those people they hate us. I think how powerful that was in our, you know, it's kind of worn off a bit now, but think about after September 11th, all they hate us, they hate us, they hate us, they hate us. And then so what does that mean? I guess we've got to kill them. You can't just let people who hate you run around there. They're going to catch you someday. So you're going to have to do something, you know, and they just, there's this, I'm sorry, one more thing on that is for you and for your audience too. There's a book called "Permia Documentary" called "Deformation." And it's by an Israeli Jew who goes out in search of anti-Semitism and he can't find any anywhere and he hangs out with Abe Foxman at the AML and all, yeah, he goes to Europe, he goes to America and all this and then I'll go ahead and ruin it for you. The punchline is the worst anti-Semi in the whole movie is his Jewish grandma who lives on the West Bank and who's an, who's an original Zionist from before the Second World War and who's telling, let me tell you about these Jews all right and she's just the most vicious anti-Semi in the whole movie. But everywhere he goes, it's fine, but he explains though the propaganda in Israel how it's just show of this and show of that, that's the Holocaust, show of this and show of that about everything always. It's a show of furniture sale, it's a show of dance party, it's the show of everything always and it's just, and you'll hear this reflected sometimes, you'll hear Jews say that like they know that everyone in the world just wants to kill them. That was the point in defamation, the way that he explains it was that that's the overall message is that everyone in the world who's not Jewish, they only wake up in the morning for one reason, it's to try to find an opportunity to do another Holocaust, that's the only reason that they even have breakfast or maybe babies or do anything, so one day they can get the chance again and so that's very powerful propaganda if you're dumb enough to believe it and be subjected to it and be corralled into relying on the liqueur to protect you then. In fact, one more thing on that, right around the time the Ariel Sharon was destroying the last chance of the peace process in the year 2000 when he went to the Temple Mount and caused the outbreak of the second in Tafada. There was a poll that said that the people of Israel wanted a two-state solution, so-called land for peace and let the Palestinians have the West Bank and Gaza Strip, but if they can't have that and it's going to be in Tafada, then they want Ariel Sharon because he's a tough son of a bitch and he'll protect them. But he's the one who went and took his troops to the Temple Mount and set off the Tafada in the first place. No, we still want to do the Rabin plan, but if we can't get that, then yes, we want a tough guy. Wow. Now, that sentiment's a long time gone, but that's how it was then. Right. There's also that whole conspiracy of how, I don't know how much of conspiracy it is, but it's an interesting idea or theory that they want to purposely get all the stuff out there to stoke anti-Semitism, to get the diaspora to move back to Israel for this whole crazy in-time prophecy stuff that's coming out, like what I'm bringing back to Messiah. There was a terrorist attack in France in the Obama years, later Obama years remember when they hit Nice and Paris, they did the Charlie Hebdo attack, Masquer and the Eagles and Death Metal Concern, other than ISIS and AQI, AQAP attacks. what was I going to say? Oh, and then Nihahu came to France and he goes, and this is like the most objectionable thing. He comes to France and he goes, that's right, French Jews. You're not French. You're Jews. Come home to Israel. You'll never be safe here. You'll never be accepted here. Like these are people whose families have lived in France for hundreds of years. Really? You know, and he's like, that's right. You can't be Jewish and French. It's got to be one of the other. Your Jews come with me and all that. And then he doesn't care at all. He's not religious at all. He's funny that he's maybe even putting them in danger in the most general sense, right? It's not a direct incitement to violence against them. But he's telling that the prime minister of Israel is announcing to the people of France that, yeah, the French Jews among you, they're not really French like you. You know, ultimately, they're all deep cover working for me is essentially the message he's sending, which is a total lie. It's a despicable lie. It's just like when they say the same thing about American Jews too, but American Jews aren't the Israeli diaspora. American Jews have lived here for 120 years, right? They all lived here from Germany and Poland and Russian, whatever, dude, from France. No, I mean, all of my Jews, if I asked 10 of my Jewish friends if they would be interested in moving to Israel, they'd be like, fuck no. Why would they? A lot of them, their Americans, they've never even heard of Israel. Israel's just a word in a Christmas song. What are you using? Who knows anything about that? Right. He makes you wonder who wrote that Christmas song. What is this, Steve? Israel will welcome your European Jews with open arms. What is this? Some recent article? Oh, this is, yeah, in reference to what I was just saying. Oh, this is the 11 year old thing. Him telling the French Jews that like, yeah, you'll never really fit in here. So come with me. Right. Right. Can you lay out this whole, the whole Wolfowitz doctrine thing? And how there was this plan to invade X amount of countries, I've had John Kerry, I'll go explain this to me. And I think he was actually working in the CIA when this, they were explaining this to him. And he thought it was crazy. But I think you got a great way of explaining this whole thing and how it like, basically like foreshadowed everything that's happened since. Okay. So at the end of Iraq war one, desert storm, the first Gulf War they call it. Paul Wolfowitz was the deputy secretary of defense for policy under Dick Cheney. And then beneath him were Zalme Khalil Zad and Scooter Libby, all three of these guys from the, you know, core of the neo-con movement. And they wrote a study that was, or not a study, but a memorandum was called the defense planning guidance for 1994, for fiscal year 1994. That's the title if you're looking for it. The original version was leaked and became a scandal. They put it in the New York Times and became a little scandal. So they rewrote it. But it says the same thing again. Just has a couple of stops to multilateralism. We'll have our European allies help us and whatever. But basically it's the same thing again. And what it says is that America will be the dominant political and military power on the planet earth from now on. We're going to take what Charles Krauthammer, another important neo-conservative called the unipolar moment. We're going to seize that moment and in that moment, we're going to build this new order where America is the dominant power in Europe, in Eurasia, in East Asia, and to the point where, forget exactly how they say, but essentially where no other power or even group of powers would consider attempting to challenge our power, right? Where we'd be so far ahead militarily and financially and the rest that Russian, China and Europe wouldn't even think that if they combined that they could challenge us so they just wouldn't even bother. Because we're going to go ahead and spread our influence. Seize the dominance that we can now, of course. It's not a perfect one-to-one correlation, but you'll find that there's a lot of overlap between what the neo-cons are doing and what they think is good for Israel. So if you're talking about their plans to expand American dominance into eastern Europe, that's not so much about Israel. But the same guys are saying, and we really need to expand our footprint in the Middle East, and that they would spend that as purely an American philosophy or doctrine, but clearly these guys are very close to the Israelis and share their interests. And probably in many cases, especially back then, maybe they would even argue that there's just no difference between Israel's interests in ours. So it's not really undermining America to do what Israel wants because we're just getting ahead of the curve as all. They help identify future enemies to come, like their problems with Hamas and Hezbollah. That's who we should fight. That kind of thing. So the doctrine behind the expansion into eastern Europe that ended up leading to the war in Ukraine. And then that's also the same doctrine that ultimately led to the expansion of American power in the Middle East as well. Now these things get a little bit conflated together and mostly properly. But so Wolfowitz had told Wesley Clark, and he said this in a debate with me on the Pierce Morgan show. And I'd heard him say this before previously, I believe, that he had had, and that's sorry for those not familiar. He's an army general, four star general, the former commander, a supreme ally commander of NATO forces in Europe under Bill Clinton. He did the Serbia War of 1999 for Bill Clinton, four star general. I still going on Pierce Morgan today. That's wild. Yeah, I know. So he said that Wolfowitz had told him in a conversation back in 1991 that now we got to go to the Middle East and clean up and take out all these former Soviet client states, the Syrians and the Iraqis, especially, and that we have this window of opportunity to do this. That was the way he put it. But then he also, when we talked about the Clean Break, which is a strategy document that was written by a couple of other Neocons, but are very close to Wolfowitz anyway. It's a pretty small group of guys. It was Richard Pearl and David Worms, or was the principal author of the thing. And he worked for Pearl and then Douglas V, then Charles Fairbanks III, and a couple others signed onto it. Maybe just one more. And this was a plan that they wrote for Netanyahu in 1996. The Clean Break. This is, yeah, and this is when he's incoming to be Prime Minister of Israel for the first time. And it's an article about how they thought quite stupidly that it would be smart to get rid of Saddam Hussein in Iraq because then that would give Jordan and Turkey dominance in Iraq. And then that would separate Iran and Syria, Iran from Syria and Iran from Hezbollah. And that they would take control of the Shiite religious clerics in Iraq and make Hezbollah stop being enemies with Israel and start being friends and build a pipeline to Haifa and all this crap. It's completely stupid, but they believed it. And so, but then it was, and then comes Wesley Clark again in 2001. In the fall of '01, I believe it's in October, November of '01. So within two months after September 11th, he goes to the Pentagon. So he's retired by this point, but he's got clearance and all that. So he's still going up there. So he goes to the Pentagon and he doesn't say the name of the guy. I think it's a military officer. He says, sir, you know, you should know that they're talking about we're going to attack Iraq. And he says, Iraq, why? Because he knows that Saddam in front of Osama. Saddam is terrified of Osama. Right. And he's talking about why would we hit Iraq? And the guy says, I don't know. And then he comes back a couple of weeks later. And the same guy says, hey, there's this memo. And it says that they want to hit seven countries in five years. And then he ticks them off. So it's Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. And this is the La Kooz hit list. Yeah. This is the La Kooz hit list, pre sure. And when they say Lebanon, they meant Hasbala. I don't know if they really want to do. Well, hell, they're bomb a crap out of table, they root today. So maybe, maybe so. But I always took that to just mean a war against Hasbala in Southern Lebanon, which is sort of the mini state of the Shiites in Southern Lebanon. But anyway, so this is, you know, essentially Israel's marching orders. And this is coming from the office of the Secretary of Defense, which is staffed by Donald Rumsfeld and his deputy secretary of defense, Paul Wolfowitz. And then under him is Douglas fight the decade in his old spot as deputy secretary of defense for policy. He's got Stephen Campbell and another Neocon as deputy secretary of defense for intelligence. He got on the defense policy board Richard Pearl, Wormser's boss and her previous boss and Gene Kirkpatrick and James Woolsey and Ken Edelman and all these Neocons. Under Douglas fight, he have an Abramscholsky, Michael Maloof and Michael McCovsky, Michael Rubin, lots of Michaels. Yeah. Michael Ladin. Wow. Now all these guys working for Abramscholsky and what became called the office of special plans, the expanded Iraq desk. And these were the guys who lied us into war with Iraq. This was the Neoconservative Network that lied us into war. And it's, you know, we kind of already knew this, but we got it from Wesley Clark that, yeah, that seven countries thing is the modern iteration or was then the modern iteration of the clean break, which was sort of another iteration of that original defense planning guidance and the Wolfwood Stockton in the beginning that what we want to do is go after the last of the states that stand in our way. And as Maybe that's it. over simplifying. I should, I guess, said, you know, along in the spirit of the defense planning guidance, but closer to what Wolfowitz had personally told Clark back then, which was we want to clean up all the last of these states. Wolfowitz famously wanted to go all the way to Baghdad in the first Iraq war. That was a huge mistake to leave Saddam Hussein in power. We should go all the way to Baghdad. He was the leader of that parade back then. So that's, and then what's the Clark is confirming that? Yes, this is essentially the same Neo-conservative doctrine. So then what do we have? We have a cross between the Lecude and Lockheed taking us to war. Essentially, that's the Neo-conservative movement. And what was the story with that dude, Chellaby? I know he was a part of this. Yes. So Chellaby was first and foremost, he's the guy that convinced David Wormser of all this bullshit about how this was supposed to work. And this guy was like a two-bit con man or something. Totally. Yeah. There's a great article by Bob Dreyfus called Tinker banker Neo-con spy. And so he was an Iraqi Shiite exile who then had been a banker in Jordan, but had been convicted in absentia from, and bezzling millions of dollars from his own bank. Then he worked for the CIA in the 1990s, trying to foment a coup in 1995, which failed. This is where the famous CIA officer Bob Bear got burned by him. That whole thing, which is kind of complicated mess. The failed coup of '95. And then I believe, I'm not sure if he was involved in the failed coup of '96. It was like, I think it was a failed uprising of '95, and then a failed coup of '96, but I think he was involved in the coup. But anyway, neither of those worked. But so that was how we got his burn notice from the CIA that we don't like this guy anymore. But so they weren't going to work for the Neo-cons. There was another Iraqi exile, an actual ex-trust get himself name. I forgot his first name. I want to say like Hadnan or something like that. Mequia was his last name. And these were like these two Iraqi exiles who were going around telling everybody that all we got to do is get rid of Saddam and peace is going to break out. It's going to be perfect. And then so one, this is in so a clean break has a companion piece called coping with crumbling states, a balance of power of strategy for the Levant also by Wormser. And you find both of those on my website Scott Horton.org a clean break and coping with crumbling states. And then they did a monograph by Wormser with a forward by Pearl called tyranny's ally, America's failure to remove Saddam who's saying, demanding that America, you know, do the clean break for net. Yeah, who essentially and I don't think Chalabee's name is in the first one. But coping is really just a longer version of a clean break kind of anyway or, you know, to a great degree. So a companion peace to it. And Chalabee's in there two or three times. And he's in the book tyranny's ally four or five times, I think. And what Worms are saying is don't worry. This Iraqi exile that we know on Med Chalabee assures us that this is how it works. Right. And so and, well, what the hell? We're spending the time on it. This was the idiot Rube Goldberg scheme. Okay. Picture the Middle East here. Right. You got Iran, you got Iraq, you got Jordan, Syria and Lebanon here in Israel here. Right. So these railies, because this is written, the clean break is written for Netanyahu when he's becoming prime minister the first time in 96. And what they're saying is forget land for peace and the labor parties, you know, Oslo peace process. We're throwing that in the trash. We're going to have peace through strength and total dominance over our neighbors. That's it. And so, but our biggest threat is his ball on our northern border, because they already had their peace deal with Egypt. And they had already signed their peace deal with Jordan in 1994. So our biggest threat is his ball on our northern border. And they're backed by Syria, which is a bought this country, bought this regime, bought this government, led by the Aloites, which is sort of a break off sect of the Shiites. But as close to the Shiites and as allied with Iran and shiaites is, so sure, sure. You're gonna get a lot of dumb questions. No, no, that's a good question. Shia shia is the same as Iran, Iranians are shia. Yes. The Iranians are the Shiites. So their 79 revolution was a Shiite fundamentalist revolution in their supreme leader, the Ayatollah Khomeini and then Khamenei. These guys are Shiite religious authorities and also political, you know, rulers there. So their friends with the Shiites in Syria and they back the government there. They have an alliance with the government in Syria. And then they use Syria to arm his bala with rockets and missiles that then they can hit Israel with. So how is Israel supposed to steal the last of Palestine? If his bala is going to constantly be firing rockets at them every time they make major advances against the Palestinians. So what we need to do is we got to neutralize the threat of his bala. And then this idiot, David Wormser, says, so what we want to do is we want to focus on getting rid of Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Even though Saddam Hussein is a secular Sunni, he's a bought this like Assad in Damascus, but their enemies they hate each other. And he's a Sunni sitting on a super majority Shiite Arab population. So picture Iraq now stuck between the Levant and Iran from Baghdad, more or less in the center of Iraq, let's say, from Baghdad all the way to Iran and down to Kuwait. That's all super duper Shiite majority territory, right? Like predominantly Shiite territory, all the way to Iran. So Saddam is really the roadblock preventing Shiite power from connecting from Iran through southern Iraq to Syria and to his bala because he didn't fuck with those guys. Yeah, he hated them. He just bought America, support his Saddam Hussein for eight years in a war against Iran to contain the Iranian Revolution all through the 1980s. Now David Wormser is saying, and this is why I call it like a Rube Goldberg machine if you ever played like the board game mouse trap when you're in elementary school or whatever. There's like a Rube Goldberg contraption. It has 100 moving parts just to drop the thing on the mouse. So, but what's supposed to happen here is that once we get rid of Saddam, then we'll put in the cousin of the king of Jordan. And because he is a Hashemite, which means Sunni kingdom from Saudi Arabia that the British had put in power in Jordan back a hundred years ago. But they claim to be descended from the prophet Muhammad. And David Wormser says, as long as we put a Hashemite king in power in Baghdad, as long as he claims, as long as he's a Hashemite and has the blood of the prophet, then the Shiites will do whatever he says. We are assured this by our good friend Ahmed Chalabi, the Iraqi exile who promises us that this is how it works, right? But this is not how it works, dude, okay? So the Shiite leaders in Iraq and Iran and wherever they do claim to be descended from the prophet Muhammad and can even claim to trace their lineage back to him and all that. The Sunni Hashemite family also claims the blood of the prophet and they claim that they can trace it back. Maybe they can, I don't know, sure. But the point being is that Shiites revere their own religious leaders who have the blood of the prophet or whatever. But that doesn't mean that they are hypnotized slaves and do whatever they're told, even by their Shiite religious leaders, much less Sunni kings from the Levant who they may claim to have the blood of the prophet. But that doesn't mean that they can boss these people around anymore than I can boss you around. There's just no connection there. In fact, when the British had installed a Hashemite king in Iraq, it lasted for like 20 years with 30 years with British power backing it from like the 20s through the 50s. But then it fell because the Shiites would not cooperate with it at all. And they even had a fatwa against, which is like a religious edict against cooperating with the Sunni kingdom. So if David Worms are had known his history at all, he would know that no putting a Hashemite in Baghdad is not going to be a magic spell over the Shiite population there. But then he went further, Chalabi promises us that then the Hashemite king will be able to tell the religious leaders in Najaf Iraq, which is in far southern Iraq, the Ayatollah Sistani and his guys, that we'll be able to tell them to tell Hasbalah to stop being friends with Iran and start being friends with Israel. And then we'll even build the oil, rebuild the old British oil pipeline from Mosul and Kierkoop to Haifa. And the new Shiite Iraq under the enslavement of the Sunni king will then be best friends with Israel and Turkey and Jordan, America's friends, and will be this giant block on Iranian power. So this is completely stupid and wrong. By the time they did the war, the cousin of the king of Jordan, I don't know what happened to him, but the king died and his son became king. I guess I need to go and study up what happened to the cousin. But they dropped the idea that they would put the king's cousin in there. And there were times where they even floated making the king of Jordan, the king of both somehow or whatever. But they never did any of that. And they ended up by the time of 2002, as I'm sure you may know, the idea was, well, we're just put Chalabi in there. The same guy who told it made all these promises to us. We'll just make him the guy. And then he'll tell all the Shiites what to do. They'll build though a pipeline to Haifa and all that now. So this was the thinking the absolute idiot thinking behind Iraq were two. So there are, and I know that this is true and it's really a shame that there are, you know, maybe a million guys or something right because there were so many guys that rotated in and out of Iraq. I forgot the total. It may have been a million guys fought in that war overall. You know, something like that. High hundreds of thousands of guys. And there are a lot of guys who fought in that war. There still have no idea what that war was even about. Who was shooting at them and why and what? What, what had happened was America took the Shiite side in a civil war and we put Iran's best friends in power there, not our best friends. I'm in Chalabi got a job at the oil ministry or whatever, but he wasn't in charge. And then if you look at the guys that were the prime ministers while we were in power there, after once they wrote the Constitution and held their purple finger elections and all that, it was Ibrahim Jaffari and Nury Al-Maliki for the rest of the time of W. Bush. These were guys from the double party are supported by Iran. And in fact, there was, what happened was Chalabi was caught leaking to the Iranians that the Americans have broken their codes. And then so they launched a counterintelligence investigation into Chalabi and his friends at the Pentagon. And the DIA and CIA both leaked to the papers that they thought that Chalabi didn't just leak to Iran that we had broken their codes. Chalabi had been sent by Iran to lie to these Israel first traders and convinced them that a war against Saddam Hussein would be good for Israel just to get us to do that dirty work for him. And how did this come out? So I mean, they put it in the Guardian. You should be able to find it. Or DIA. So there are plenty of stories about they're investigating him for the leak. But then they went further and they go, I think it was CIA and DIA both say, we think, because remember, CIA had already put a burn notice on this guy. They didn't like him. He was welcome for the Pentagon Neocons. And so maybe they were just blaming him, but they were saying that it was Iran. There you go. They were saying, and look, it's true, dude. They had a Rocky National Congress headquarters was in Tehran. And in fact, as long as we're at this, dude, go ahead and I'll give my disclaimer while you type it up. Okay. Go to salon.com. And the article is called how Ahmed Chalabi conned the Neocons. And you got to forgive me because look, salon.com is the weakest, gayest, stupidest, damn website in the whole world. Everybody knows that. And so please forgive me, but listen, the guy that wrote this article is just Google it. It just got a good, how Chalabi conned the Neocons. And then no, no, on Google. And then type in salon after that. Yeah. I'll come up. There you go. So look, this is by John Dizzard. And John Dizzard is a serious journalist from the Financial Times. I'm barely acquainted with the guy, but I know him and he's not some woke. Kami Kuk from salon. Like you would think of this article is from 2004. And back then, salon actually published journalism from time to time. So sue me. Okay. I'm sorry. God damn it. I wish this article was at the Financial Times website. We wouldn't have to do this. But look, this article is freaking hilarious. And it has it's all about how he was just lying to them, dude, and they're stupid. And if you forgive me, okay, I'm going to get this all in trouble here. Do control F. Jews. Okay. So here's Mark Zell. Mark Zell was friends with, Mark Zell was a law partner with Douglas V. Representing settlers on the West Bank. Okay. So here, oh, no, I'm sorry. This is the wrong one. But this is even better. Okay. This is a guy, wrong anecdote from the same article. This is a guy who was friends with Amit Chalabee from this investment group in Jordan. And he said he asked him, Hey, man, what are you doing hanging around doing business with all these scientists? So now I am quoting Desard quoting Mo Assad quoting Chalabee. Okay. So nobody, you know, Lynch, our friend Danny here. It's not this fault. He told me not to worry. He just needed the Jews in order to get what he wanted from Washington and that he would turn on them after that. Oh my god. Right. And then so now if you just do Zell, Z-E-L-L, and you'll see where Mark Zell is, you know, pounding the table and saying, Chalabee is a treacherous, spineless turncoat. Well, it's in there. He's up and down a little bit. Yeah. He's a treacherous, traitorous turncoat. See, he said that he would build a pipeline to Haifa. And he promised that he promised a lot of things. He promised a treaty with Iraq. Wow. This is, and you could still follow Mark Zell on Twitter to this day. He's a riot, dude. And he's a total, you know, LaCoudenic cook. Like I say, he was law partners with Douglas Fight, who was the head of the office of special plans and who signed onto the clean break. And here he is. One of these quotes is, well, he used to have one set of friends. And now he has another one. He's a treacherous traitorous turncoat, whatever. So there you go. So, wow. So the Neocons are as stupid as they are evil. And what's hilarious about this actually is that this big fat, dark David Worms, or who thinks that he could pick a fight with me and win it, which is just, okay, I picked the fight. But he thinks he thinks he can resist at all. It's hilarious. This idiot, David Worms, or did this interview with a, like a born-again Christian podcaster guy, where they were reviewing Tucker's 9/11 thing. I forgot a line of document. Yeah, 9/11 documentary. And so they're critiquing it. And they make some actually interesting points. But a couple of things about the first thing is he confirms everything that I say about who's who and the divides inside the Bush administration at that time. He's disputing what I think is, he's kind of taken Tucker out of context and then disputing him. But in doing so, he confirms everything that I say about what was going on there and all that. But then he also continues to sputter this idiocy about how no see the Shiites have to do whatever the Hashemites tell them because they have the blood of the prophet. But as Dave Smith pointed out, if that's true, why don't you just pick up the phone and have the King of Jordan call the Ayatollah and call the leader of Hezbollah and tell them to knock it off. Why do you got to have a regime change in Baghdad first? Why don't you just call the Ayatollah Sistani and say, Hey, Ayatollah Sistani, tell Hezbollah to make nice with the look out. Do your magic spell hypnotize him. Doesn't work. This is completely stupid. And here he recorded this interview I think late last year, the year 2025, after America just handed Iran, handed Iraq over to Iran over to their very best friends. After his entire war played out exactly the opposite of what he said. He says in coping with crumbling staves, a free Iraq will be a nightmare for Iran. No, dude, you just got rid of Saddam for Iran. You big dummy. You put the Dawah party in the Supreme Islamic Council in power there. And then he stayed. He worked for Dick Cheney, I think, into the second term. And he still doesn't remember the war that way. He thinks he won. Does he? At what point did the Ayatollah Sistani call the Ayatollah comedy and Hassan Nasrallah and tell them to knock it off and start making nice with the West and with the Israelis because I don't remember that happening this whole time. Right. Why can't they do that right now then? There's nothing but a sock puppet is the king of Jordan, even a human man. He's a sock puppet wrapped in cellophane package delivered owned controlled straight out of Langley, Virginia with no will of his own whatsoever. David pick up the phone, call the king of Jordan and tell the king of Jordan to tell the Iranians to open the straight pal. Tell him to use his magical hypnosis powers with his magical bloodline. It doesn't work. And yet this idiot still thinks he was right about Iraq war two after all this time. And I like picking on it because everyone always blames Richard Pearl and Richard Pearl was the lead gangster here. But Worms are is the egghead. Worms are was the academic who told Richard Pearl, yeah, this stuff. Chalabi told me checks out or whatever. Jesus. So since we're already on the subject of summer cooking on this podcast, before you pretend your kitchen is fine, let's talk about those pots and pans you've had since college. If it warps, sticks or burn stuff, do everyone in your family a favor and throw it out. Summer is when we mix up our meals the most. Stakes on Mondays, Taco Tuesdays, burgers for the boys, breakfast for dinner. That's why I love the ease of my hex clad cookware. It makes cooking effortless. I no longer have to scrub my pans. I simply wipe them and they're clean in a couple seconds. And I often find myself admiring them when they're sitting on my stove top. Their nonstick is ceramic and protected by a stainless hex pattern. So I can use metal utensils without worrying about scratching the pan. They're heavy, they look incredible, and it feels like quality when you pick them up. They're metal utensils safe dishwasher safe and oven safe up to 900 degrees. And the handle stays cool with over 1 million customers and 50,000 five star reviews It's not a secret why Gordon Ramsay uses Hexclad at home and in his restaurants They come with a lifetime warranty, so this is literally the last cookware you will ever need to buy Don't go through another summer with cookware that makes every meal harder than it needs to be for a limited time only Our listeners get 10% off your order with our exclusive link head to Hexclad.com/danny Support the show and check them out at hexclad.com/danny and make sure to let them know we sent you. Yeah, Tucker's 9/11 documentary was wild One of the things that's interesting is I actually know one of the dudes who was former FBI Who worked was stationed at the same FBI office that those dancing Israelis were taken to? Is that right and told you the story of them being booked and everything? Yeah, uh-huh. It's great. They were Mossad, I think right oh, yeah High fibrous just so there was a woman that was in her apartment Or whoever who saw these guys on top of a parking garage filming the whole thing happened and like dancing in high-fiving and shit And then she called them she called the cops for the dancing part. I think was actually invented by I'm in azoahri's brother in Egypt. I think called it was a dancing Israelis The high fibrous. I think it was Justin called them that was a reporting in ABC and I believe Washington Post that They were happy to see the towers hit no what the fuck were the Mossad agents doing filming that okay? So there's two ways of looking at it and they're There's at least one witness and maybe even two that say that they were there at like eight in the morning Now I'd like to ask follow-up questions in front of the grand jury Police that like wait a minute are you sure they were there before the first plane hit or not or what right? Because if they were working there the day before which I believe their alibi's they were working there the day before and then when they heard about The attack or even saw it you know from their drive they pulled over because they knew they would have a good view because they Could see the towers there from the time they were there the day before so even when the guy says on Israeli TV that we were there to document the event He doesn't explicitly say we were there starting at eight camped out waiting for the first train to hit to document the entire thing, right? Like it could just be the the missing part of that sentence is we heard about it on the radio So we pulled over to document the event a lot of people pulled out cameras to document the event right so like If they if we know for fact, which we don't but they were actually what were they actually doing what was there? So what was their cover? I believe they were well they were movers. It was urban moving. They were actually moving shit Yeah, and then and they had video cameras because you there was no phone cameras back then so they must have an actual video camera with them or at least Pictures I'm not sure I know there are stills but they could be taken from the video if there's video I know there are stills that you know ended up getting for it where you know they're there I forget now in the pictures that were released if you can actually see them holding up their lighters or not I know that was the accusations that they're holding up their lighters like they're the ones burning the tower down You know like you know kind of like when somebody pretends to hold up the moon or whatever you know what I mean in there and they're like Move a little to the right. Okay right there. You know this kind of thing. So look the idea is let's let's well You could go like the worst case scenario is they were helping run this cell of bin Ladenite terrorists and did this to us, right? I don't think you need to go that far I you know another interpretation be that they knew what's gonna happen that they were tracking these guys and then they didn't warn us everything That they knew which that's what the FBI said was that they had given a warning that but you know There have been lot of nights in your country you better look out and they're giving us that warning in august But nothing specific when you know it's possible here. They knew a lot more than they had led on and Then the more benign take the most benign take is That they saw that the towers were hit they understood that these were kamikaze attacks that must have been by Arabs of some kind or another And they thought it was absolutely hilarious. Mm-hmm. They thought that this will be great for Israel and they were laughing about it And celebrating because now America will do whatever Israel says now that we've been hit by the same kind of terrorism when they got pulled over That was what they told the cops was we're not the problem the Palestinians have the problem and now you know what it's like to be us and whatever So it would make sense if they were just like that's again the most minimal explanation would be that they saw Our worst day and thought score Which is basically the same thing as Netanyahu himself. Oh, by the way. Thank you for reminding me of this anecdote So you've probably heard and your audience probably knows there is a New York Times story dated September 12, 2001, but it was published that night of course, right from that day and Their reporter. Oh, man. His name is on the tip of my tongue too Damn, what's the article called you remember? No, but it's easy enough to find because it's it's September 12, 2001 and Netanyahu tells the New York Times reporter He's asked the question What does this mean for America's relationship with Israel and Netanyahu says it's very good and Then he says oh well, or you know what I mean like not this very good, but like overall it'll help you know Because your enemies and our enemies are the same kind of thing. He's sort of like, yeah, but that's that's his original take but now What's important there we go The Israeli spilled blood those rallies Spilled blood is seen as a bond that draws two nations closer. Yes, and James there's a quote in here from Netanyahu Yeah, so there you go. It's very good. Well, ask tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel Benjamin Netanyahu the former Prime Minister replied. It's very good Then he edited himself well not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy He predicted that the attack would strengthen the bond between our two peoples because we've experienced terror over so many decades But the US has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror So And in Sharon says I believe together we can defeat the forces of people But now here's what's funny. Okay, this article is by reporting in James Bennett And I had no idea about this. I only got this footnote from John Schwartz left wing writer No T and Schwartz there And no age and John by the way John Schwartz and He pointed out that James Bennett that same reporter He wrote an article ten years later september 11th 2011 And he wrote this article for the Atlantic And in this article for the Atlantic he recounts this conversation with Benjamin Netanyahu But he includes a line that got cut to the New York Times floor But it's included in the Atlantic article Write in this same conversation where Netanyahu is saying to him That it's very good He also says Hmm, I wonder if the American people will blame us for this Now he's not talking about them secretly putting bombs in all the towers and a bunch of crap It's that he knows good and well that this is the motive of al-Qaeda to attack America that America supports Israel They're merciless violence against the Palestinians and the Lebanese And so he just muses out loud to James Bennett I wonder if the American people blame us for this This is the night of september 11th and then he says Nah I'm sure they'll see that just you know, we got a lot in common against our common enemy and whatever But he brought that up because he knew good and damned well Why they hate us they hate us because Bill Clinton at Israeli insistence kept the bases in Saudi to bomb Iraq for the entire end of the 20th century there They hate us because we provide the f-16s and the m-16s that the Israeli defense forces use To mercilessly slaughter Palestinians and Lebanese and steal their property That's what it was about those are the main reasons that al-Qaeda turn on the United States Netanyahu is no fool on that and so he couldn't help himself But didn't know I wonder if the American people we're gonna blame us and like we're gonna actually not benefit from this We could lose from this if the American people you know are wise enough If their president would tell them the truth about what just happened here Why and so saying well they hate us because we love our mama didn't Been lot in Make articulate this in his manifesto or whatever to the American people or something like this This went viral on tiktok like a year or two ago. Yeah now here's the thing about that That was from the letter to America, which was from 2002 and it included a bunch of like Single white liberal female tiktok mom type people Saying oh, I get it been lots of hero or whatever which was not right at all right and not that he was even anywhere near justified In attacking civilian targets is completely crazy and stupid, but then that became the narrative right it was like These these people are taking bin Laden's side. Well just forget that go back to 1996 his first declaration of war against the United States was in 1996 and it's called the declaration of war against the Americans occupying the land of the two holy places That is Bill Clinton's military is stationed in Saudi Arabia to bomb and blockade Eddie Rock is the title of the damn thing. Wow. And then on the first page, he goes on and on about the Con of Massacre. We now call it the first Con of Massacre because they did it again in 2006 and then they did it again this year in 2026. Huh. Anyway, in 1996, the first Con of Massacre, get this, it was enough tolly Bennett. The once and almost certainly future Prime Minister of Israel was the artillery officer who called in an artillery strike on a UN shelter and killed 106 women and children. And Ben Laden ramped it all about that on the first page. Where was this again? In Con of Lebanon. Lebanon, okay. And this is where Jesus walked on water, they say. Just to tie it into, you know, things people know of. So Ben Laden ramped it all about this in his first declaration of war against the United States. Never get the severed heads and arms and legs of the babies and the children in Con of. Well, that was what inspired Muhammad Ata and his friend Ramsey Ben al-Sheep to join Al-Kaeda. Muhammad Ata then was the lead hijacker on September 11th. And he joined Al-Kaeda because of Ben Laden's propaganda about American support for Israel. So catch up now. Stay with me. You got an Egyptian engineering student studying in Hamburg, Germany. Those have Afghanistan to volunteer for Saudi Sheik to kill Americans as revenge for what Israel's doing in Lebanon. See, that's blowback. That's the consequences of American foreign policy. And of course, these are terrorists that America built up their entire network with Britain and Saudi Arabia. It's a fight the war in Afghanistan as well as in Bosnia, Kosovo and Chechnya. In fact, as I show and provoked 11 of the 19 hijackers, I'd fought on Bill Clinton side in Bosnia and Chechnya, 11 of the 19. So even though they were attacking us all through the 1990s, America was still supporting them all through the 1990s as long as they're killing Serbs and Russians. Just the same way we support them now like in Syria as long as they're killing Shiites. And so then he put out another declaration of war in 1998, it was, you know, "briefer." And the point being that, and there's a really great book about this, well, my book enough already has all this in it. But. What did you publish this one? In '21. '21. That's all the terror wars from Jimmy Carter all the way through Trump won in there. But Michael Schorer, the former chief of the CIA's bin Laden unit, made this point. That bin Laden, if you read, you know, all his collected writings and whatever, he could go on and on about all religious justifications. But justifications for taking revenge for real things that the American government was doing over there, right? So he was not, unlike in the propaganda. He was not saying they got to get us because of the song, "Baby, it's cold outside." Just shows what degenerates we all are and we got our rated movies and girls can show their knees and public and whatever had nothing to do with that crap at all for our freedom, for our freedom. That's right. And now, you know, did they disapprove of American licentiousness and whatever on those terms short? Is that the reason for their war against us? Absolutely not. And as Schorer pointed out, after, you know, reviewing all of this bin Ladenite propaganda throughout the 1990s, all of the recruitment stick, the stuff that he used, the sloganering that he used to recruit people to fight us, was all based on American policies. Very real actions that everybody knew was true, right? It wasn't even, he wouldn't even say, you know, "Operation, this and that, you've never heard of," right? He would say, "They're occupying the holy land of Saudi Arabia, birthplace of, of Muhammad and the religion of Islam, Mecca, Medina and all that," right? So they're occupying Saudi Arabia in order to bomb and blockade Iraq. Well, they're supporting Israel in Palestine and Lebanon. They're supporting dictatorships throughout the region to keep them compliant. They're putting pressure on them to overproduce oil and keep the oil prices artificially low to subsidize our economy at their expense. And as they would claim quite incorrectly, we turn a blind eye to Russian, Chinese, Kazakh, and Indian and other violence against Muslims, supposedly such big humanitarians, but when Muslims are the victims, we don't say anything. And that wasn't really true. Bill Clinton backed them again in Bosnia and in Chechnya, although he did kind of stab them in the back in Bosnia, and I think they might have been a bit salty about that. But anyway, and they backed them against, they backed the weakers against the Chinese during that time, too, before September 11th in the 1990s. So anyway, but it was these concrete reasons that he would cite in order to get people to join him, right? If he was just complaining about our R-rated movies, nobody's gonna come across a New York tower over that. The way he got Aata was he criticized American support for Israel killing kids. And Aata said, all right, I'll join that fight. Just exactly the same as Americans joined the fight once our towers got hit. Right. Exactly. We already had a massive standing army and somehow we got 50,000 new recruits in the way. If some country sort of bombing elementary schools in the US, like we would definitely do the same thing. Right. American Muslims joined the army because their solidarity was with America. Right. That was who they saw as the side that they were on in the fight, you know. Just as where, you know, this Egyptian is volunteering for their Saudi to avenge Lebanese. It's all one kind of umo over there, maybe it's not a United States, but it's the Muslim lands over there. It's no different than a Californian being upset about what happens in New York, you know. Right. Right. It's dude, the whole Middle East is just like this horned sness. It's all it's historically just been so hard for me to follow everything. All the moving parts in the little countries and regimes and religious fundamentalists that are fighting. Well, that's why I wrote enough already. Yeah. That's kind of where we started here about. Yep. Despite all my new world order, cookery from previous days, my real point was that I got used to building these timelines to explain all this stuff to myself and how each one of these interventions sort of set the stage for the next intervention. So we do a bloody coup in 1953 in Iran and we turn it from a constitutional monarchy into iron-fisted dictatorships. This is because they wanted to own their own oil, right? Yeah. And the Americans were worried that they were going to start tilting toward the communists. They were allowing a communist party to run and things like that. Let me ask you this. So anyway, that just kicked off the chain of dominoes that have been falling this whole time, really. Today's episode is sponsored by Quo, a spelled Q-U-O. The communication system built for businesses so you'll never miss a call. Miss calls to the slow follow-ups are silent killers and businesses lose momentum without even realizing it. Quo fixes that by letting your whole team handle calls and texts from one shared number. So nobody's out of the loop. And customers actually feel taken care of. So I ended up locking my keys in my truck at the beach and I ended up having to call three locksmiths before I got one to answer. The first number called me back, but it was too late. It's not just that they lost my business, but it feels like they don't care when they don't answer my call. And you don't ever want that happening to your business. Quo works right from your phone or your computer, keeping everything in one clean view. Its own AI even logs calls, creates summaries, and flags next steps so nothing ever falls to the cracks. More than 90,000 businesses currently use this because it fits how modern teams actually work. Your money is on the line. Always say hello with Quo. My Quo for free plus 20% off your first six months when you go to Quo.com/danny. That's qu.com/danny. I've been hearing reports. I've been hearing people talk about how, and I don't know how true this is. How the United States is still sending the Taliban $80 million a week or something like this? Have you heard this? I don't know the numbers, but yes, I'm sure they are sending them for an aid in the name of, you know, feeding people and whatever. So why are we sending the Taliban that much money every week? Oh, it's such a racket, man, all the NGOs, all of the humanitarian relief organizations and all of that. I'm sure there is a real need. It's a very poor country and they've been through a 20-year war and, you know, I don't know what economics the Taliban know, but it ain't much, you know, so like are people in need over there a lot? Wow, every couple of weeks. The United States confirms $80 million every 10 to 14 days to Afghanistan. Amazing. Yeah. What's the date on that? That's just crazy. So, so this is just like, and they can spend that on whatever they want, you know, it doesn't have to go to, and look, this is a story about war for everything we've done or what? No, I, you know, it's in the name of humanitarianism, I'm virtually certain it'll all be in the name of food aid or providing, you know, arming the, or providing the, the money for the groups that distribute the food aid and all that, it's just the same as any of these. And the whole war is like that, too. It's a huge racket of distributing all the humanitarian goods and all the state department flunkies and all the USAID flunkies and all of the attached NGOs and stuff. It's a huge industry. I read something somewhere that said the reason that we could be funding the Taliban with all this money, it was to disrupt supply chains between the Middle East and China or something like that to like fund them to like. sabotage supply to China. Does that make any sense to you? No, I'd have to know more specifically what they're referring to there, you know, I mean, I really don't know a lot about America's current relationship with the Taliban regime and Kabul. You know, how much of one there really is or not. Let me ask you this. When Trump was running for election on this previous election, and you know, he was beating the drums on being the solidifying, solidifying his legacy of peace and no more wars and all this stuff. And with all of your knowledge and seeing the patterns of history with the United States and the people that are operating behind the scenes here, did you foresee how this would end up with this presidency so far? Yeah, I never believed in Trump. And you know, Ron Paul is the hero we needed. Trump is the hero we deserved. And he, look, he's Rudy Giuliani. That's what he is. That's who he is. Right? He's so, you know, if there's a charm in him, it's that he'll abruptly tell the truth about, you know, horrible things. But like, right, like the Mary Maidlson thing. Yeah, like, I have, I think it's in enough already. You know, I begin each chapter with a series of quotes, notable quotables. And I think it's at the, toward the end of there, I have Trump saying, oh, the military industrial complex, they're so corrupt and evil, they own this town. And then the other one is like, oh, the military industrial complex, they love war. And you know, why? Because they love money. And right, like this is, he goes 10 times harder than I guys and how are right, the way he says it. Right. And then the third quote is, we love Lockheed and Raytheon and Boeing. And we want them to be strong. And we want to make sure that that right. He's just Juliannie, man. He could pretend to be an America first. But, you know, even the phrase America first, that really was sabotaged. There's a horrible evil, maybe Israeli spy. New York Times reporter named David Sanger, who's been on the Iran beat for many years. And Sanger interviewed Trump in 2016. It may have been 2015. And he says, so your policy, you know, in regards to Europe and Asia and whatever, would you say that your America first and Trump goes, oh, yeah, I like the sound of that. Well, what's going on there? See, is that Sanger was trying to trap him because America first was the America first committee. And that was a slogan of the America first committee. The people that wanted to keep us out of the Second World War until they disbanded after Pearl Harbor. And so the connotation there is supposed to be the horrible anti-Semitic kudis, because everyone knows that the real story of World War II is we should have invaded Germany in 1935. And anyone who was against joining that war loved Hitler. And especially that horrible, horrible American hero, Charles Lindbergh, the first guy to fly across the Atlantic and got his baby stolen and all that. Well, you're supposed to hate him because he used the J word like three times and run up to a rock to World War II. And so he's supposed to be radioactive toxic AIDS. And if you get the Charles Lindbergh name anywhere near you, if you get America first anywhere near you, then everyone's going to know that you're a right wing anti-Semitic reactionary, terrible, terrible person. And so that was why David Sanger suggested that to Trump, is he was trying to hang it around his neck like a millstone. And so here's the problem. Americans have never heard of Charles Lindbergh, not even the heroic aviator or the guy who got his baby stolen, much less that he one time gave a speech where he used the J word when he was oversimplifying who was trying to get us into the war in Europe. And he should have been more specific. Well, so the America people didn't know that they were supposed to hate Trump for saying America first. Instead, they just heard America first and they were like, well, this is America. And we're Americans. What are we supposed to be? England first, China first, Israel instead. Or yeah, America first. Sounds right. So it made a good slogan. But point being then that Sanger's a horrible guy, but also that Trump, when he used that phrase, he was not calling back to the guys who wanted to keep us out of the European war. He was not calling back to the America first committee or Charles Lindbergh or Joe Kennedy or anybody else involved in that who was trying to keep us out of war. He was a say in America first, which if you come to think of it, if those words don't really have a context or mean anything, then George W. Bush can be America first because America first, this means I'm a stupid selfish jerk and I can do what I want and no one can stop me, right? When America first met, defend America first. It meant France is not America's eastern frontier nor is Ukraine. Defend America first. Leave the world the hell alone. Not go out and mug an old lady because you can do what you want and no one can stop you. Help the Israelis, you know, genocide, a population off the base of the earth because they want to steal their property, right? You know, and so, but it's a little too vague, ain't it? America first. It needed to always be like Garrett Gritz book, defend America first and leave the rest of the world that hell alone. That's what that is supposed to mean. But see, Trump never meant that. He only got it from Sanger who was trying to sabotage him. Trump never read Romando. Trump never read nothing. Right. You know, right. So there was, so yes, so I saw right through him. He's nothing but an Israeli agent. This is my big joke last June was, I told you he wasn't a Russian spy. He's an Israeli spy. And in fact, they even had like a funny conspiracy theory that the Russia gate hoax was actually a heroic attempt by the FBI to stop Donald Trump because they knew he was going to nuke Iran. And they thought, well, you can't say that because that's anti-Semitic. So they would accuse him. They falsely accused him of the Russia gate hoax instead in order to try to bog him down, which I'm just joking about. Let's try to save us from Israel. There's 75 pages on Russia gate and provoked by the way. I hate Russia gate, and I debunked the hell out of it, at least tied with the best Russia gate debunkers in America. That's crazy to me that there's still people that believe that whole thing. I talk to people all the time, that I just read. What are you reading? What are you talking about? See, Israelis. Look at who is son-in-law is? Look who? What? Look at his son-in-law, Jared Kushner. Oh, yeah. Yeah. This is the Lecude, man. That's all it is. I was joking, you know, when he was running in 24 that he's running on the Lecude party ticket. I wouldn't be surprised. He named Netanyahu Prime Minister of our Senate and kicked himself upstairs and just let Netanyahu run the whole damn government at this point. Right. I mean, that's it, man. Sorry about it. I don't know if it was fake or real, but I saw something on Instagram this morning that Netanyahu is allegedly coming to the White House UFC card in two weeks. Oh, really? I can't imagine that's going to be popular. Yeah. I mean, he's got to do what he can to try to shore up where the top comment on that post on Instagram was, like this comment, if what you really want to say will land you in jail. I don't have like two thousand bucks. That's funny. I just like to see him get in there with any old member of Hamas and just do a bear knuckle. Let's see who wins. You know, that's what I was saying. That's what I said to someone. Dom challenged George W. Bush to do a boxing match. Let's just settle this in the ring. Yeah, and Bush pushed out. That's what I was saying. I was saying, that's what they should really do with the White House UFC ticket. They should get all the top, like most, uh, most guilty people in the Epstein files and let them do a celebrity death match, like a political death match on the White House White House lawn sounds good to me, dude. I'll help you curate the list there. I think that would be that would be entertainment. That's the entertainment that American needs. You know, dude, um, set us free. Um, so what do you think the outcome will be of everything that's happening in Iran right now? Well, okay. As I said, George W. Bush put Iran up to pecs by giving them Baghdad, giving their best friends Baghdad. They're not total puppets, but they're very close. Compared to having Saddam sit in power in Baghdad, George W. Bush enhanced Iranian power by hundreds of percentage points, right? Um, this is at least equivalent to that. And in fact, probably much worse in terms of American, you know, strategic folly. Now, I don't give a damn because I want to come home from everywhere anyway. So it's no great loss to me. But the war with Iraq didn't result in us losing all our Middle East bases didn't result in, you know, really the calling of the bluff of American conventional military power because of course, America did kick Iraq's the nation's states militaries ass in three weeks, right? Uh, same with the Taliban. They can't stand against our air power. Our Marines, our army will, our green berets will go in there and blast a crap out of that. But in both cases, they prove that we cannot defeat an insurgency, right? We can take on a state army. But as far as like leaving our guys standing on a street corner, they get blown up and we're not really that good at figuring out how to deal with that. Very much. You want to mean? Yeah, urban combat and picking and choosing parties in some crazy foreign country where, you know, they're every one of their customs is different from ours and everything else. Um, so you could even cut them a break, right? You could even say that like, well, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, they really only prove our inability to do counterinsurgency, right? They prove that Stan McRistle and David Petreus are full of crap when they push all this coin doctrine stuff. James Mattis too. Those guys suck. Still though, you can't take on like our real big green machine when we're coming. And at you, you can't take on our Navy. You can't take on our Air Force. You can't stop our Army if we really come at you. Well, here we really came at a country that's nothing like a near peer to us, right? Iran is a not even a mid-ranked power, right? They're in the lower third at least of nation states, you know, powerful nation states in the world. And they held us at bay. And not only that, but they proved that they can reach out and touch all of our bases in the region. They hit our bases in, you know, from Northern Iraqi Kurdistan all the way down to Oman, hit cutter, Bahrain, Saudi, UAE, Oman, and also Jordan. Now, they didn't destroy all those bases, but they hit them and they took out whatever radars they wanted to. They pitted runways. They hit planes sitting out on the tarmac, they ate wax, the Boeing, you know, mid air refuelers. And they proved that essentially no American base is safe. I'm very fond of quoting Justin Logan from the Kato Institute said, "What good is a military base that you can't wage a war from?" And like, whatever dude, it's true. I've worn for 20 years that this is the case. You know, you're familiar with that map that this is like the funny meme that goes around. I said, "Oh, yeah. Well, if Iran doesn't want trouble with us, how come they put their country so close to all our military bases?" Right. And it shows all those military bases around. But I would always make the point that you see, that's why we can't have a war. All our guys are hostage. All our guys are too close to Iran. Right. Now, back in the Bush years in Obama years, we had 100,000 guys in Iraq and 50,000 in Afghanistan. They were all hostages. They were allied with the Shiites in both countries. They could have got order 66 right in the back. Right. Is that too old over reference now? 21 years ago. So that was one of the main reasons that W Bush was afraid to do it back in 2007, was we had our guys embedded with the Shiites. We're turning their Shiite militias into the Iraqi army. We start bombing Iran. All our guys could get shot right in the back. Right. Well, but even still without that, just having a few bases in the green zone and in Kurdistan. Right. Still, they can reach out and touch them. And they did reach out and hit every one of our bases in Kuwait. The main, our fifth fleet station at Bahrain, totally destroyed our main air base at all you did in Qatar, taken totally offline. They hit it a few times and then the Qataris agreed we won't let America fly any sorties out of this base for Iran to spare it. That's our central command headquarters, our main air base in the region, no, no, avoid. When war breaks out, the locals go, oh, sorry, you can't use your base. And then they hit, you know, whatever else in Saudi and and and UAE and the rest too. So that means then like picture of the Gulf. It's been the case really since World War II, but especially since the Carter doctrine in 1980 that the Persian Gulf is an American lake. We will, in fact, Carter announced that the Soviet Union tried to invade Afghanistan and dominate the Gulf. That that would mean nuclear war with the United States of America. You know, he's giving like a NATO Article V war guarantee to that body of water. Nobody better tried to dominate this Gulf or you got to fight with us. Well that bluff is canceled, it's called and on a totally unforced error on a war that we started that we absolutely did not have to. We bombed them on the 28th, why not on the 27th? We had no need to bomb them on the 27th. We didn't have any need to bomb them on the 28th either. We started this war as total unforce error. And so like Iraq put Iran up by a huge percent. This has two, but it has also, because of course it's half their Gulf, right? It's half their coastline, but it's also taken us down three pegs over there, right? Carter, Bahrain, Saudi, UAE, Oman, Iraq, all those countries, Jordan, they all have by far like, I don't know how to quantify it, but a massive deficit in trust in the United States, conventional military power to protect them. We cannot shoot down all the incoming rockets. We cannot just sit here and beat our chest and say that everybody has to do what we say or else. Apparently the Iranians ain't that afraid. They'll keep fighting. So it changes the calculation. Hell has got to change the entire conception of the balance of power in East Asia as well. South Korea, Japan and Indonesia and Australia and obviously the Taiwanese, everybody has to be now wondering what good are American war guarantees. I mean, obviously we have age bombs, so nobody ever better attack Los Angeles or Norfolk, right? Or you're going to have a real problem. But can we actually use our conventional military power to choose winners and losers around the world? Evidently all you need is like a moderately sized intermediate range missile force. Right. There's drones too, which we're taking out of rockets and the asymmetrical warfare part of it where they're going to cost 50 grand versus a million dollar rocket. I read a thing that says they cost eight. Wow. People are way overestimating. Well, customization has something happened yesterday where we shot down a bunch of their drones. Yeah, they were attacking Kuwait in response to America attacking. You know, we're on. It's like an Israeli style ceasefire where we're still attacking them. And now it hasn't completely fallen apart into general hostilities. At the time we're recording this at least the so call the 28th, the 28th of May, less you. But there's a real danger now, so okay. So here's the thing. And now I'll actually get around answering your question, maybe Iranian power is going to be greatly enhanced, but I don't know. I have no good way to predict for you, like how Trump is going to back out of this and this. Like what is he going to do? Like every day that goes by, he has less, less off-ramps, right? Yeah. And he, he tweets so much and he contradicts himself so much, even like in the course of one statement, he'll contradict himself. You know, we have everything in hand. We're going to have a deal like any, any minute now. And then, oh, the Iranians, they're so desperate. Surely they'll give in to me and whatever, like in the same thing. You know, like I thought you just said that they were like in the process of signing on the dotted line. And you're saying you're sure they probably pretty much will once you hurt their economy more in another little while or, you know, right? So he doesn't know what to do. Right. Netanyahu promising, just like W. Bush. This would be easy. I got to do it and go in there and knock them over and then you do whatever you want. You get what everyone? It's funny because like I was just watching yesterday, I was watching an interview that the dude from Vice Shane Smith interviewed one of the head people in the Iranian government. Oh, is that right? He went there and he was like walking around and they gave him a tour of their, their nuclear reactor or whatever. Really? At Boucher? Yeah. I think so. Yeah. Okay. You can pull up that vice video. It was just dropped like two days ago or three days, maybe four days ago. And like they're showing it like check out this nuclear reactor. Guess who gave us this nuclear reactor? The United States of America under Adams for peace. Right. In the same. Yeah. That'd be their medical isotope reactor in Tehran. Yeah. It was our first nuclear reactor and and then Shane Smith was like reading some of Trump's tweets to him like how they're, they're begging, they're begging for a deal and like. Fuck man. I am, I can't, obviously you can't just take everything they say as the gospel, right? I mean, of course they're going to, they're going to say whatever they have to say to, to, for, you know, public perception. But like, fuck man, that dude was extreme, seemed at face value at least very measured and very reasonable in his response to this crazy shit like Trump's just like lashing out. And, and, and you know, this guy seemed very, he's like, look, the Straits of Hormuz, you know, it's not just about trade, but that is also if we give America access to the Straits of Hormuz, we're going to give a country who's attacking us and doing this war of choice against us a whole nother front of attack on our country like that's a whole nother angle of attack they can take against our country. Yep. Yeah. This is the one. Fast, scrub through it to where you show where he's walking through the nuclear reactor. It's pretty funny. It's funny how like the Iranian leadership are notorious for all being a bunch of PhDs and stuff. I don't know if you saw that funny meme where their former foreign minister is saying, Alexis de Tocqueville, who I'm sure all Americans have read, you know, because he was educated in Colorado or whatever, so he read democracy in America, but none of us ever have. Right. I have democracy in America by Alexis de Tocqueville, but I never really, I'm going to read it someday, man. When the Iranian leadership will have them. Oh, so, yeah. So here's one of the questions he was asking this guy. He's like, look, if this is the nuclear reactor that we gave them, he's like, he's like, look, it seems like the source of all of your problems here in Iran are your nuclear, is your nuclear shit, right? And everyone's so worried about you getting a nuclear weapon. He's like, bro, why not just go to fuck? fossil fuels. You guys, all these reserves, we could do wind and solar. Like, that seems like a legitimate question. Like, if I was the head of Iran, I'm like, maybe just like, let's get rid of the nuclear. It'll save us a lot of headaches. Let's just go to fossil fuels. So was he say to that, he, his answer was like, look, we're a really big country and, you know, everyone else relies on nuclear energy and he made like the climate change argument. That's pretty good. What he should have just said was just focus on, and this is what they have said in the past. It's just, it's a matter of opportunity cost. They have their own domestic supplies of uranium. There's not much of a global market for uranium, but they can burn their own uranium to run their electricity program and sell their oil if they could ever get their sanctions lifted. And then they never say this, or I shouldn't say never, but I can't think of a time they explicitly have said this and I, they have denied it before. But I think it's pretty clear that their intention in creating their civilian nuclear program was one, what we just talked about there, just saving money on this so they can learn that. Yeah. But it's also because, and, and the hawks will complain that this is a giant loophole in the nonproliferation treaty, but they're guaranteed under the NPT the unalienable right quote unquote to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes or to pursue nuclear technology for peaceful purposes. Well, the problem with that loophole wise is you can master the ability to enrich uranium to whatever percentage you want and to be able to make yourself a nuclear weapons threshold state. So what they, their position has been since I guess like '06, at least. I think they, I think it's fair to say they, they had mastered the fuel cycle in '06. Should double check that because there was a, a, a moratorium while they were negotiating with the Europeans for a few years there and they had an additional protocol, but I'm pretty sure they, they were enriching biosex. But anyway, the point is that what their showing was, look, I'm not making nukes, but I could. So don't push me, right? So they're, this is like a latent nuclear deterrent. Brazil and Japan and Germany are the same. They, everybody knows they know how to make nukes. They could make nukes. They, they can enrich uranium, but they're not doing that because the circumstances don't warrant it currently. And so they're not. In the case of Germany and Japan, they have war guarantees from the United States. In the case of Brazil, they don't have any enemies that threaten them whatsoever. So why screw around, you know? And they sign the MPT. But the point being that, so the Iranians were in a tough position, right? Because America declared they're going after rogue states that had the capability to deliver weapons of mass destruction, starting with Saddam, but then maybe Korea and maybe Iran and maybe Syria. So Saddam goes, look, man, I got my hands up. I'm not doing nothing. I already gave you all of my thing. I don't know. And they went and they just buffaloed right in there. They just lied their way right in there anyway. North Korea said screw this, man, we're making atom bombs. That'll keep you out. And they did. They withdrew from the treaty. They started making atom. Wasn't that something with Clinton where like he made a promise with Clinton, but he went behind his back anyways and did the bomb got the bombs? No, not exactly. But let's get back to that in just a second. Okay. So the Iranians said, look, man, our books are wide open. Our hands are up. Don't shoot. Okay. You can see what we got here. So unlike Saddam who had no nuclear program at all. And they go, well, the fact that he won't admit that he has one is proof that he's hiding it. Yeah. Well, they go, look, we have a nuclear program. But you can send in your inspectors to monitor the thing. We're not diverting uranium to any military purpose. So you got no excuse to go after us, right? That was essentially the position they were in because they knew that if they broke out and tried to make a nuke that we would bomb them first. Like we were W Bush was essentially in the position. I guess he just decided he didn't have the bandwidth to stop North Korea. So he just didn't. But if Iran had really broken out toward a nuke, he would have started a war against them to prevent them from getting that far. So this was the standoff really leading up to last June was Israel was saying, America, you can't let Iran have a civilian nuclear program because it's just cover for a nuclear weapons program. They're going to make nukes and they're going to use them on us. So you should just attack them now. And then Bush, Obama, Trump won, Biden said, no, we're not doing that. However, Iran, you better not break out toward a nuke and try to make a nuke because if you do, we'll bomb you before you're done. You won't have a man that had a project because we'll do whatever it takes to prevent you from getting that far. So don't you even try it. Right. And then they would say, look, man, we're not making nukes. So don't do nothing. But if you do something and start bombing us anyway, well, then we might. Right. So they were, they would never say that last call out. But that was heavily implied. And they, we were, they were letting us give them a full cavity search. Like absolutely. They had now. And in fact, I got a little bit, I got in a little bit of trouble on the Rogan show a couple of weeks ago when I talked about this because he asked me another question when I got to when I was talking about under the Obama deal. And then we skipped ahead to the war. But what happened was Trump came in and tore up the Obama deal in 2018. Right. And so the JCPOA. So now, as I was saying, Iran is already a member of the non-proliferation treaty. And they already had a safeguards agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency. All the JCPOA did was just add another layer of inspections and another layer of restrictions on their program on that. So for anyone who wanted to pretend that, Oh, geez, we don't know, they must be making secret nuclear weapons. The JCPOA expanded inspections to such a degree that nobody could even plausibly make that case anymore. And then, but what happened was Netanyahu implausibly made that case in 2018. And you did that presentation where they claimed that they found all those files at that warehouse outside of Tehran and that all these files proved that they had a secret nuclear weapons program after all. And that was what they used to convince Trump. To tear up the deal then. So so you think the JCPOA was a good thing. Yeah. Look, people are mad because they got money. Right. And it makes, you know, bad Hasbara where you got this giant palette full of cash. Right. But the thing is that was Iran's money that America stole during the revolution in 1979 that they had sent over here to buy weapons with. And they just kept the money. So John Kerry convinced them to join this deal where they roll back their program. They expand their inspections. And all they get on in return is their own money back. And sanctions relief that we end up never even giving them. Right. So, you know, there was such hype. Donald Trump said about it. I think yesterday or this, I think yesterday, that under Obama's deal, they would have a nuclear. Obama's deal gave them a nuclear weapon and they'd have nuclear weapons and they'd be using them on us by now. But this is just even like sub bush or Bill Clinton level lies here. This is completely retarded and stupid and wrong. And he's just relying on people not knowing the first thing about it whatsoever. Now, he could complain that the Obama deal had sunset provisions on some of the restrictions, not on their restriction against making nuclear weapons, but on how many centrifuges can be spinning at any one time and whatever. But the thing is if he had come in in his first term and just played hardball and said, now, listen, I don't like you. And I don't like the president. I just replace and I don't like this deal. I want to get rid of these sunset provisions or I want to extend the length of them or whatever. He could have done that. Right. But he tried to do that. He just tore the damn deal up. And then according to the deal, it said in the deal, if America breaks the deal and leaves the deal, then Iran can then cease abiding by some of its restrictions without breaking the deal. It's said in the deal that they could stop obeying parts of it in order to try to get America back in the deal essentially to play that pressure. So here's where we get to this crap. I know you heard it a million times. Your audience has heard this a million times, but they got 60% enriched uranium. Well, you can't make a nuke with 60% rich uranium. I guess theoretically, you could, but no one ever has. And it would be a massive, unwieldy thing. It has to be above 90% enriched uranium to make a nuke. And so what they do is, like Marco Rubio is the most quotable on this, but they all kind of do this. Rubio goes, hey, look, man, the only countries in the world that have 60% enriched uranium have nuclear weapons. Okay. Sounds good. Yeah. No. No nuclear weapons state isn't reaching to 60%. They're only enriching to 60% on their way to some higher grade. In fact, they make virtually all nuclear weapons states make their atom bombs out of plutonium anyway. So he's just bluffing, right? What he's doing, he's what he's trying to say is they got no excuse to enrich up to 60% and they're like on their way to 90% weapons grade. And so you're supposed to be upset, but you're not supposed to stop and ask, well, why do they stop at 60? Why not 65 or 70 or 90% they could have enriched up to 90%. you two thirty five. Why they stop at 60 because they're not making nuclear bonds, right? What was there? It was their response to it. What did they say about the 60% I don't know if they ever explicitly said this, although I think they probably did, but it's clear anyway that it was leverage. It was a bargaining chip got it, right? They're saying boy, you guys really don't like it when we enrich up to 3.6% and you really, really don't like it when we enrich up to 20. Well, now we're going up to 60. And in fact, they didn't even do that until the spring of 21 when in the Biden years because because at the end of 20 in Trump's lame duck period in December of 20, they use the Mujahideen e-calk communist terrorist cult. The Israelis did to assassinate the head of Iran's nuclear program, Dr. Fakhir Zada, some like that. They killed him with a remote control machine gun in December of 20. And at that time, I believe that's when they started reaching up to 20% again. They still hadn't gone up even to 20% until then. And then in April of 21, the Israelis did a big sabotage attack at the Natanz enrichment facility and blew up the electric station thing. No, no, no, this later. And when they blew up the power station at Natanz in 21, that was when they started enriching up to 60%. Got it. And it's clear. There is no other explanation. The explanation is they're trying to get us back to the bargaining table. That's it. There's no other use for the 60% except to use as a bargaining chip. And yet what these people do is they go, they respond to the pressure that the Iranians are putting on them by enriching up to 60% by just essentially lying and pretending that the 60% in rich uranium is itself a threat. And it's to the point where, of course, Trump, you know, again, I'm pretty sure this statement was yesterday. He's like, there were two weeks away. They had a nuclear bomb in two weeks and they weed to use against Israel and all the other countries in the region. And this is just zero percent true, just zero. There's no chance whatsoever that if they did their absolute best, that they could have had a nuclear bomb in two weeks. That's just a damn lie. And then if they had one, they're going to use one gun type atom bomb, which is going to be what, like Hiroshima size 10 kilotons, and they're going to kill all of Israel and all the rest of the Middle East too, with their one atom bomb that they got now. Let me ask you this. Like this is Bill Clinton level stupidity and deception. It's really embarrassing. Let me ask you this. If they did hypothetically have nukes, who are like the top three to five countries, that would be most worried about that. Obviously Israel is number one, right? Saudi cutter. What about China and Russia? What are their stances on Iran? What is their concern? I'll be wrong getting nukes. I think China has been less helpful, but Putin has been very helpful in getting the ayatola to the table to do the JCPOA of 2018, for example. Oh, really? Yeah. And it was funny. Trump claimed this, but the Chinese did not, but he claimed that he had agreement with Kim, I mean, pardon me, with Chairman Xi when he visited a couple weeks ago that they agreed again that Iran must not get nuclear weapons. But that has been the consensus of the UN Security Council. And China has been at least abstained or been relatively supportive of Bush and Obama's efforts to get Iran to deal and to promise not to make nukes. The thing is the nuclear weapon states are all members of the NPT except for Israel, India, and Pakistan and North Korea. But the major nuclear weapon states, America, Britain, France, Russia, and China, they do not want to see nuclear proliferation. They're already superpower states or, you know, major power states with nuclear weapons, arsenals, they don't want to see those spread. They like, they consider things to be, you know, stable how they are. And so that's their promise in the non-properation treaty is one that they'll give up their nukes someday, which they don't really mean, but two, they promise never to give them or share them with anybody else. Yeah. Nuclear submarines are the scariest part of nukes because like, it's one thing to have like a ground-based ballistic missile launcher, right? But it's a whole another thing if you can sneak a submarine up to the coastline because then there's like, there's no warning time. It's literally up and then it's, that's, does Iran has now the capability of submarines? No. No. Right. Certainly North Korea. Traverse the North Korea submarines, but they're diesel-powered submarine. So they're like really easy to hear and they got to refuel all the time. So it's like not that big threat. Yeah. Look, I overall, and we could talk about the North Korean nukes if you want to, but overall the thing is, yeah, I read this story about how we're working with the Australians and we're going to build up this new nuclear submarine force in Australia, nuclear-powered submarine force in Australia. And they plan to be done with the whole thing by 2060. Maybe it was 2050. But just the, you see how they reveal there that like they had no intention whatsoever of having normalized relations with China by then. They anticipate a permanent, you know, armed Cold War confrontation in the Pacific. Who? The Pentagon. Right. The American Strategic Planners. They got this huge submarine program that they don't expect to be ready to open for business for another 25 years. But that's what they're working on because it just doesn't occur to them that we could just get along with China and ramp down all these tensions and not need a whole new nuclear submarine. Are these the Colombia clustering submarines? I forget. Yeah. It was the same thing with Iran and the rest of these. We just normalized relations with Iran. We could have normalized relations with Iran a long time ago. And then it doesn't matter if they have nukes. And then they're even less incentivized to try to break out and want to make a nuke. Why would we run want to make a nuke? We already got rid of Saddam who's saying for them, who do they need to protect from other than American and Israeli aggression or the only ones. Yeah. And by the way, you know, there have been so many times where American, you know, influential powerful people and representing powerful interests, particularly oil interests, have wanted to normalize relations with Iran. And then it was the Israeli lobby that just vetoed it. And this goes to like the in the early Clinton years, you know, it's a big New Brzezinski had been Jimmy Carter's national security advisor. And so the Iranian revolution was a huge humiliation for him just as well as it was Jimmy Carter, the hostage crisis and the failure of operation, equal claw and all that. All that egg was on some big New Brzezinski's face. But by the beginning of the of the Bill Clinton years, right? So what 13, 14 years later, he's like, what the hell? Bygones, bygones, man, we can get along with Iran. You know, we should do is we should make a bunch of money building a pipeline from the Kaspian basin across Iran. That way we could screw the Russians because you know, he was Polish and wanted to screw the Russians more than any other thing. So let's build a pipeline south through Iran. This would be a great way for us to make money and to end the Cold War with Iran and begin to reintegrate Iran. The revolution was a long time ago. Who cares if they got to eye a toll or not? Whatever, man, we can do this. And Alexander Hague, who had been Henry Kissinger's guy, Kissinger being a Rockefeller guy, and Alexander Hague, and then Reagan's Secretary of State. He said, yeah, exactly, man, let's normalize relations with Iran. Let's build an oil pipeline across Iran and have it terminate on the Gulf, get some oil out there. And you know, who agreed with Brzezinski and Hague about that? The CEO of Halliburton, Dick Cheney, whose job it was, you know, they build oil infrastructure. That's what they do. They build pipelines and transfer stations and stuff. That's what Halliburton is, or oil services construction firm. Dick Cheney goes, yeah, man, you know how we screw the Russians? We build a pipeline across Iran. And he even, and this actually caused a little mini scandal at the time. I happen to remember from the 90s that in 1998, he made this complaint in Australia. And that's like bad manners for government official or a former government official to criticize American foreign policy on foreign soil. Oh, man, you're not supposed to do that even if it's Australia. So when Dick Cheney was in Australia and he said, that idiot Bill Clinton needs to lift these sanctions so we can do business with Iran. He said, God didn't see fit to put all the oil under friendly democracies. So we're just going to have to do business with whoever we got to do business with. And then that caused a little mini scandal at the time because he dared, you know, be overseas while he made that criticism. But what was this criticism? That Bill Clinton should lift the sanctions and normalize relations where they run. That's wild. In 1998. And then so what happened was of course in all these cases is the Israel lobby screen bloody murder that absolutely not. And then of course, once Dick Cheney becomes vice president and he can socialize all Halliburton's costs and have the Marine Corps pick up the slack in terms of their blood loss and the rest, then he'll just do that instead. And did push very hard for strikes into Iran in 2007, especially, but Bush wouldn't go along by that time. So when Karaoke was here last, he was telling me that there were two national intelligence estimates done on the Iran's nuclear program. And essentially what this national intelligence estimate is is where they get he said it's the highest level intelligence assessment that is you can get. Right. Highest one possible. It's where you get the heads of all 18 agents, all 18 intelligence agencies. And they all come together around a big round table, and they all, they ask every single one of them, do you think they have, they're going to have a nuclear weapons program, do you think how, whatever, they ask them all, and they, they, on both times, it was unanimous across all 18 U.S. intelligence agencies that they did not have a nuclear weapons program. -Exactly right. -Which is fricking nuts. -Yeah. Now, the, it's funny because it was published in November of 2007, and it made a huge, you know, difference when it came out was written by Thomas Fingar, was the head of the National Intelligence Council at the time when they published it. It caused a huge scandal, and W. Bush complained in his memoir about how he had to balance great before the king of Saudi Arabia and say, "I'm sorry, Mr. King, how can I, um, your Royal Highness, how can I launch a war against a country when my own intelligence agencies say they're not making nukes?" And I know what you think. You probably think that I told them to say that, but I didn't, they're screwing me by doing this and whatever, but there's nothing I can do about it, sorry. And, um, so what they determined in that, and in fact, check me, dude, I bet you can find me saying, "Release the Iran NIE." I'm pretty sure I wrote that for anti-war.com in 2005, two years before the National Intelligence Assessment. So we knew that they had an NIE two years before they finally published it. Damn me if it's '06, but I bet you it's '05 when I say that. Release the Iran NIE because we already knew that the National Intelligence Council has investigated this and decided that Iran has not made a nuclear weapons and it took two more years before they finally published the thing. And then when was the most recent one? Was I there? I don't know. I know they reaffirmed their same position ever since then, including in 2011, and in, you know, with all the estimates that came out after the JCPOA, then, um, in, I don't know about Biden years or Trump won if they had a new estimate then. I don't think that they did, but I know that in the threat assessment from January or sorry February of 2025, by Tulsi Gabbard and the, the director of National Intelligence Office, which is relying on CIA and everybody else's assessments there. So this was not an NIE, but they reaffirmed their intelligence that Iran has not made the political decision to begin to try to make nuclear weapons, to embark on an atom bomb program. And then she reaffirmed that in testimony before the Senate, just a couple of weeks before the war started last June. Oh, damn it. It was oh sick. I'm sorry. Wow, bro. I'm sorry. Release the 20 fucking. If you want as long as you're on anti-war.com, search for who's behind the coming war with Iran. And that's me from August of '05, where I warned that they can close the straight-ahore moves 21 years ago. Wow, dude. You've been on this beat forever. And look, I mean, and by the way, like I am, as we established at the beginning here, I am just escape order. I only know this stuff because of so many other people were doing so much great work at the time and my job was interviewing them, reading them and interviewing them. Steve, that's not a wrong scholar. I just know. Is it a WHO apostrophe? Yeah, you got it. There you go. So August 5th, 2005. And just do control F for or moves. Or maybe maybe I just say I might just say the gate of the Persian Gulf. It's in there somewhere, damn it. Where is it? There you go. Oh, yeah, see, so I got this part totally wrong. Think of Iran as a fancy western word for Persia. It's the other way around. Think of Persia as a fancy western word for Iran. But then it's coastline comprising one side of the Persian Gulf. Right. Access to Saudi oil and the Arabian Sea could easily be halted, which would destroy the world economy and quickly. Wow, dude. Sorry, dude. But so yeah, a lot of people were warning about this for a very long time. Newsweek has learned that the CIA and DIA have wargamed the likely consequences of a U.S. preemptive strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. No one liked the outcome as the Air Force source tells tells it the war games were unsuccessful at preventing the conflict from us. That's another question. Like, are they not wargaming this out now? Yes. Oh, now. I don't know what the hell were doing now. Because I heard before. Yeah. I heard that there was the joint chiefs of staff, dude. Dan Kane, right? Who basically was against this whole thing in the beginning. He was telling Trump not to do it. Is that correct? I'm not sure about that. I'm not sure that Trump asked him if he should do it or not. I think Trump asked him, Hey, man, if I ask you guys to put bombs on targets, can you do that for me? And then he said, I, I, sir, you know what I mean? I don't, I never saw anything where Trump said, Hey, man, this is a bad idea. Let me know or whatever. I don't think and I mean, you know what? No, no, no, no. You're writing. I'm wrong. You're writing. I'm wrong because I totally forgot about this. But you are absolutely right because they put this in the Wall Street Journal. I think one day before the war, wasn't it the Thursday before the war that Kane was in the Wall Street Journal saying we're going to run out interceptors. Yeah. That's what I thought. You're right. He leaked it before the war that he had worn Trump. We cannot shoot down all that they have to shoot at us. Right. And this was, you know, the point here, too, that I was making way back then. This came out as I was, I, I had the, the source then saying that they don't like the war games, even on 05. But in January of 2007, the, the joint chiefs took W. Bush to the Pentagon and gave him a briefing where they told him, look, okay, we'll do the surge in Iraq, but we don't want to go to Iran. Don't make us do Iran. And they explained the reason why was because they would lose escalation dominance. And that means essentially that, that there is the Pentagon doesn't want to fight anyone unless they believe they will control every stage of the conflict. That's escalation dominance. Maybe the conflict will escalate. If we attack them here, they'll attack, they'll counterattack there. Yeah. We'll be ready for it. We already know what all their options are and we'll have them completely poned all across the board. Right. But if we don't, like say, Iraq, for example, what the hell are they going to do about? As Paul Wolfowitz said, Iraq is doable. Right. Right. Iran, not so much. We can look, are we the superpower and them not absolutely? Can we bomb them to hell and, and can, yes, and can they bomb us in our country here? No. Right. But can we control every stage of the conflict over there? No. Right. And the reason why more than any other reasons, the same one you already know, their medium-range missile force. They never built up a big land army. They never built up a big navy. Trump goes, "Oh, we sunk their navy. Their navy is sitting in port doing nothing." Their entire military force was around short, medium, and intermediate range missiles. They can take out our bases. They can hit Israel. And so if, so we ought to not put them in that position. Right. Now, remember how the IATOL, the old dead IATOL, and now acted when Trump killed Soleimani? Didn't do anything. He shot rockets at an empty corner of an American base in Iraq as a symbolic thing only, right? I didn't even give warning to. Even gave warning. Yeah. And remember last June, Israel with American help, since they're in bombs, them in bombs, and finally America jumps in, and drops 14 bunker busters, and was IATOL to do. He shoots 14 missiles back at our base in cutter, but deliberately misses and calls ahead and warrants. Trump even thanked him for, "Thanks for the heads up for calling ahead and warning that you're going to do it." So this is nothing but the symbolic open hand slap, right? Nothing like, dude, I don't want to fight you. I can't sit here and be a total pacifist in the face of you bombing my nuclear facilities. So here's a touch. Here's a slug in the arm. Right. But then, come on, man, let's not do this. But then, as we were all warning, that if the goal is regime change, and you're going for a real war, and you put their backup to the wall, well, they're going to hit all our bases in the region, man, they're going to call our bluff. We better have our boats way the hell out in the Indian ocean, out of range, or they're going to be sinking our ships, man. They could hit our ships, and we're very lucky, actually, that even in their strikes where they did hit all those American bases in the region there, they did not target the barracks. They did not bring massive volleys and try to kill as many American servicemen as they possibly could. It was like, take out this radar dome and take out this runway or refueling station or something, and then they hit oil refineries and chemical plants and all of that. But they did not sit there and try to kill as many Americans as they possibly could. And wisely, so, right. I mean, I think they know our present is loco. And if they were to do something like sink and aircraft carrier, or I mean, I don't think our carriers are dumb enough to get that close, but if they were to do something like sink a ship with a few hundred or a few thousand guys on it, then Trump might start reaching for really big bombs and get really upset, and they're not trying to do that. So they have not really targeted our Navy. They've not targeted us for mass casualties. They played an asymmetric game very carefully. And yes, they've hit civilians. They killed civilians in hitting these oil tankers in the golf and all of that. Like damn them, I'm not taking their size. or whatever. American civilians, not sure. I know they hit American tankers up there off the coast of Iraq and Kuwait to show that it's not just the straight. It's the whole Gulf. It's called a Persian Gulf for a reason, man. They can hit any part of it that they want. And they've hit civilian targets in terms of the refineries. And I believe in, I think it was in Bahrain. There was this massive chemical plant that they hit. Is it the water desalination plants? Aren't those a huge deal out there? Because the water, they have so much water. I don't think they've hit them yet, but that's the threat, right? Because that's going to cripple the people there, that's going to starve the citizens of the country. It could destroy this country. And that was our whole argument in the beginning of this. We need to save the people of Iran from this evil totalitarian religious craziness. That's a bunch of crap. And you know, if they start attacking those things, it's just like, hey, look, they support Al-Qaeda in Syria. It ain't about Islamic fundamentalism, dude. It's something else. Israel hates the Shiites more, so we'll support any Suicide bomber as long as they're fighting against Israel's enemies in his balla and Iran. I don't understand it, man. It's just like, it feels like, I mean, I know that Trump is probably the most pole-aware president in the history of the country. Like there's no one who's been more hyper focused on polls than this guy. And this is the one thing that he's just basically losing everyone's support on. When you got a wonder what they're telling him to, man, I mean, like, what is it? Like, just come out with it. Just like, tell him, okay, I was in the fucking files. Fuck off Israel. I think people would like him for that. Yeah, dude. Seriously, like, you know, I sincerely doubt that he hurt children or that if he did, that they have proof of that, that they can hold over him or whatever, like, I don't know. I suppose anything is possible, but, like, I don't think that that's really true. I think that they would have used that. The CIA would have used it against him back 10 years ago, you know what I mean? So I just, I don't think it's that, like, if they got him blackmailed anything, it's cheating on his wife with just some fluzier, but like, who cares, dude? Just admit that. We're giving him a good word. Epstein probably gave him a girl who was under age who looked like she was of age and he didn't question it or whatever, and like, maybe, like, but still. Like, the times that that was in, that was normal, right? All those dudes were doing that crazy shit. All the most power people in the world were doing that stuff. Like, unless he was doing something truly evil, just come out with it. Just admit it. I don't even think it's that, dude. I think one, it's the money from Sheldon and Miriam Adelson. Sheldon really? Now, but it's the money they gave him so much money and, and like, look, I think there's a handshake there. So, like, these are just his friends, right? It's not like, you know, people would say about him, especially like in his first term, that like, oh, when I think this guy's anti-Semitic, and it was like, dude, first of all, he's like completely filo-Semitic, you know? He's like, obviously, surround himself with the far Israeli right, even. He's like an Israeli-Jewish nationalist in his own way or whatever. He said they would vote him to be president over there. Yeah. But even if they, even if he didn't like them though, if he didn't like them, then he would dislike the Arabs a hundred times more, right? If that's what we're talking about, I was like, Trump is some kind of crotchety old racist or whatever, which I don't even think is really right. But, but like, does he have any regard for the Arab Palestinians at all? Even if they're Christians, dude, he doesn't care about them at all, dude. These Israelis are his friends. They tell him that he's handsome and tall and wealthy and successful and he likes that stuff. You think it's not simple? Yeah. I guarantee you, it's being a national intelligence estimates. I guarantee you there's a national intelligence estimate in Israel that simply says, just flatter him. Wow. Right. Like, that's all. Just tell him he's handsome. He'll do anything you say. In fact, you guys might have seen this. He's got a huge cock and you're the most best president of the U.S. has ever seen. They posted a video on the White House YouTube channel and then they took it down a few weeks ago. I think when the war was still going on, like before the cease fire was declared. And what had happened was you could tell he gave this speech. It was at the White House. He gave this talk to a small group. And I think he even like acknowledges the camera for a second, but I think he knows the idea is this is a private thing and this is not going to be on TV. So he cuts loose a little bit more and then they ended up, I think, accidentally posting it anyway. Some people saved it and stuff, you know? But he says and think because he can, he can be like this, man, where he's just so abruptly honest. And he says in the thing, something like, you know, when people want me to do something, all they have to do is flatter me. I really like it when you tell me how great I am and in fact, I'll even do bad things for very bad people. Yeah. If they'll just tell me that I'm great. And I think that was almost certainly a reference to Netanyahu. I'll do bad things for even. I think he even said for very bad men as long as they say nice things to me, like he would just send it like that. That's it. Dude, that was what it is. Yeah. And so, you know, this is how Bill Crystal used to get John McCain. He'd go, wow, John McCain, you remind me of Theodore Roosevelt. And John McCain would just swoop into his arms. Who do you want me to kill, Bill? You know, it's the same thing here. They go, look, man, you're, you're even better than Abraham Lincoln. You're even better than George Washington. You're, you know, you're as good as Abraham Abraham. Is this the video? Oh, wow. Oh, good. Here, here. You can hear it through these. Oh, cool. Great show. I love this guy. He's so nice to me. Every time I watch, and I, you know, we're not supposed to be seduced that way, right? But I am. When somebody's nice to me, I love that person. Even if they're bad people, I couldn't care less. I'll fight to the end for them. So I appreciate it. Well, I feel like he's like letting out all these little Easter eggs to like vindicate himself. And I was like, explain to the people who are really paying attention. Why is doing all those crazy shit? You know, that with the Mary Madelson video, like, I don't even think she cares about the United States. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, you know, too, there's so many people who feel betrayed by him because they gave their loyalty to him, like, with him barely even really asking, right? He made a couple of promises about curbing immigration or whatever, and then he said no new wars. So I don't know about all this friends, but he said that and some people just gave him their undying loyalty. He just not return undying loyalty, right? He'll stab his friends right in the back, right in the front. He don't care about that. It seems like the people he's most interested in impressing are people who used to not like him, right? Lindsey Grant. Well, I don't like you. You don't like Jews. And you don't want to do all the wars. And then he's like, desperate, Lindsey, my man, what do I got to do? Who do I got to kill to make you like me? What do I got to do to suck up to you? And then Lindsey Graham goes, okay, look, just bomb the tons, okay? Okay. You know? So you think his vicious attacks on people like Marjorie Taylor, Greene and Thomas Massey are just because Israel is telling them to do it. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, well, you know, they crossed him by contradicting him on Israel, but yeah, I mean, I'm sure Miriam Adelson checked with him like, you want me to destroy this guy, right? And then yeah, you know, I mean, they spent what's $25 million on a house race. And this is how it works, by the way, man, for people who wonder about the, you know, secret Israeli control of America, what it is. And this is in, and they do lie cheat and steal and blackmail and whatever, there's, there's a lot of that. But their primary object as in detailed in, in Walt Meersheimer's book, The Lobby is, they're just a special interest. And they lobby just like a special interest does. Yeah. And just like with Archer Daniels, Midland or Cargill or Monsanto or whatever, or the Chase Bank or whoever, they've got office towers full of lawyers. And secretaries and receptionists and staffers whose job it is to do work. And so they have a list of 435 congressmen. Yeah. If anybody on this list crosses us, they get a mark. And then they'll even call, I've heard congressmen tell this story guy, it just starts running for Congress. Just size of put is, is having the ring in the Democrat primary son. And somebody from A Pat comes calling and goes, here, just sign this pledge, we'll give you 85,000 books, we'll help bankroll your campaign. And you read the thing, no, fine, what do I care, I don't know, get your money. But if you go, wait a minute. No, actually, I don't like this. I'm still, I resent the way you guys hope lies in the war with Iraq 25 years ago. So screw you. They go, oh, screw us, huh? Well, we're going to give this $85,000 to your primary opponent instead. Maybe we'll give him double 190. And then if you still in the primary, then we'll see you in the fall. And if somehow you win in the fall, well, we'll see you in two years. And they don't drop the ball. They stay on the ball. They've got their chart, they know who they hate, they know who their vendetta is against, they know who dared to cross them and who must be made to pay a lesson and to, you know, to take a lesson and serve as an example for the rest. And so you can even see the way APAC has been bragging about the defeat of Thomas Massey. is, you know, this is what happens when anybody messes with us. Don't even try it. And now, back to like your earlier question about, isn't that really bad? Has Barra though, when they just kind of can lord it over us that they're, you know, in charge of us in this way, that they get to make these decisions for us in this way? And I would say, yeah, but you see what I mean about how, well, to them, they're getting their work done. They got rid of the guy that they didn't want, and it worked. So, you know, whatever they suffer in terms of bad public relations later, that's more nebulous and diffused and spread out over time in place. Yeah. But they got rid of the guy they wanted rid of. And they set an example for other congressmen, that boy, if you want a career on Capitol Hill, you have to go along with these people and they will get your ass. And there's just nobody organized with enough money to stop them. There's no group that says, actually, we have hundreds of millions of dollars, too. And if you will only tell your APAC representative to screw off, we'll double whatever he was promising you. Right, there's just nobody like that. There's no American patriot with money who's willing to spend it in that way, not one. There's nothing we can do about it, and we don't know where we're going to shop. We're going to shop for shopping in Germany, so we're going to shop for shopping. Do you see any opportunity or any possibility of this changing, or like the chickens coming home to roost? Oh, yeah. I mean, well, it's a lot of fun, right? And seeing how poorly American democracy works on this case, right? Like you have especially on the Democratic Party side, where the owners and donors of the party are hardcore Zionists, and 98% of their voters are not. In fact, there was just a new poll that said half of young Jews in America want a binational state. They don't even believe in Zionism at all. They're the headlines functionally anti-Zionist, half of American Jews. Never even mind the rest of the Democrats, okay? Oh crap, right. So you have the power versus the people. And the people absolutely may not win, must not win, cannot be allowed to win. Actually, those AI tech surveillance shit. Oh yeah. And like, there was a funny anecdote from. I'm pretty sure it was the 2012 convention in LA. It was definitely in LA, I think it was in 2012. And it was the mayor of LA, Villa Rosa, I believe was his name, was the chair of the party. And they did a vote on Israel. And the eyes were like, "I." And the nays were like, "Nay!" Like the whole giant basketball stadium. Just roaring with nays on shouting down this pro-Israel resolution. And the chair looks offstage. And he goes, "Okay, the eyes have it." And bangs his gavel. And the whole place just goes up in a riot. You know, like, you've got to be kidding me, dude. Wow. Because like, "Hey, those are just the rules, dude. That's just how it is." The people do not get a say. Y'all are just decorations on this. And the y'all are extras in our TV show of our convention here. You don't get to choose. But that is untenable, right? You can't just go on forever like that. Right. And now on the right, I think. On the right, it's becoming like 50/50. And even more so among the young, where people are also very much turning on Israel. It's not quite as stark of a difference between the party and the people as it is on the Democrat side. But there are a lot of people on the right. Who are absolutely sick and tired. It seems like most, you know, the ones I talk to that aren't are just the people. It's like the people that will follow Trump to the gates of hell, you know, are the only ones like the people, like, you know, like my dad's age. You only watch Fox News. They don't really, they don't really give a shit about it. They're just like followers of Trump no matter what. This trust him. Yeah. And, you know, partisanship is the mind killer, right? You don't want to help those other guys win their weight worse even if you're mad about what this guy's doing and whatever, you know, those kind of arguments work real well. But, but look, man, you know what it is. It's just the abject cruelty of the Israeli regime and the way that they persecute their helpless victims here. I mean, you know, I don't know how confused people are about this still. I assume pretty bad. But, you know, the Palestinians, it sounds like they have a country called Palestine, right? Like, we're Americans from America and Canadians are from Canada and these Palestinians are from Palestine. And so, it sounds like it's the country next door to Israel and that Israel is always at war with this next door in neighbor, Palestine. But that's not right. Palestine is an Indian reservation. The Palestinians have already been whooped. The Gaza Strip and the West Bank were already de facto annexed and taken stolen by Israel back in 1967 and the millions of Palestinians who live in those territories kidnapped along with them. And when the Israeli's bomb them, what we're talking about is a canned hunt, right? This is not the same as America fighting Mexico across the Rio Grande. This is like America going to war with the Navajo on their reservation out in Arizona. Shooting fish in Maryland. Yeah, that's right. Like Dick Cheney and his friends where they do like a canned hunt literally with fences and even like chain link ceilings. So they can go around and hunt wild and delicious animals. That's fucking weird. You know, yes, the Republican way of war. So this is how this is what's happening to the Palestinians, right? Israel is on top of Palestine. Israel's war Palestine used to be and then these are the last, you know, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip is the last 22% of historic Palestine and the Israelis are insisting on stealing the rest of it. You know, they love to use these ridiculous cliches. I go, if Hamas laid down their arms, then we'd have peace. But if Israel laid down their arms, then Hamas would just kill all the Jews. That's not true. The Israelis don't want peace. If Hamas laid down their arms, the Israelis would murder every last one of their babies and steal their property. It says in the Bible, they can kill whoever they want and steal whatever they want. The enemy is Amalek. Even though actually if you read the Bible, they finished killing every last a melechite 3,000 years ago. So you must just be bullshitting that these people are Amalek or you can just call anyone you want Amalek and then you have the right to murder them. But that's all it is as murder. It has nothing to do with self-defense whatsoever. The Israelis are the aggressors. Now, Hamas did kill innocent civilians, not only on October 7th, but in the past, they've done suicide bombings and pizza parlors and city buses and all kinds of crap. Screw them and their horrible evil, you know, murderous tactics of targeting civilians. Just because the Israelis are the aggressors doesn't mean that they're heroes, okay? But it means that the Palestinians' civilians are the victims of Israeli aggression here. 100%, 100%. October 7th, nothing but the thinnest excuse at this point for what they've been doing for what 80 years. I heard they were doing something like taking the Hamas fighters and like having people following them back into their homes before they killed them so they could kill them in front of their entire family. The AI. Yeah, there's an online news outlet called 972 mag. That's the area code of the country code for Israel. It's called 972 mag. And they did these reports on an AI program called Lavender and another one called Daddy's Home. And that's the one you're talking about. It ain't even just an IDF soldier follows them home. It's the AI decides this guy must be Hamas and then follows him home and then either kills him in front of his children or kills his whole family with him too. And they were doing the same thing. The committee to protect journalists at least at first were keeping count of all of the Palestinian journalists that the Israelis were killing. And then in so many cases, showing where they would wait until the reporter, the journalists would leave his house and then they'd kill his wife and babies right after he left the house. Or they wait till they get home and kill them all. And it's the most deliberate thing. I don't know if you saw Tucker last night but Tucker had a fantastic monologue last night and then he interviewed a doctor from Oxford University who is an abdomen specialist who was over there operating and tell and Tucker the absolute worse horror stories, dude, of operating on children without anesthesia. Oh my God. People die a little girl who was wounded in her throat and they operated on her. She was okay. But she couldn't swallow and they couldn't give her IV fluids because they had nothing. So she just started to death over two weeks and just died. Emotion would have otherwise been okay. And talked about how we covered this at antiword.com that the signature wounds were clearly what's happening is the Israeli snipers are having fun, having contests where they today, they shoot everybody in the elbow. Tomorrow they shoot everybody in the head, the next day in the neck, the next day in the genitals. Little boys blow in their parts off for fun. Their own commanders told how are rats. Our soldiers kill Palestinians, quote, for sport when they're board. Unquote. That's the commanding officers said that. They do it. They don't have contests for which body parts. Let's shoot them on the left knee today. We'll get them on the left knee. And then the doctors are like, what is this? This is like the fifth left knee guy we've had today. I'm like, oh, you see what's going on here? And then tomorrow it's in the eyeball. Tomorrow it's a little boy's parts. And then what they do is they justify this by claiming that they are the master race, the uber mentioned and that the Palestinians they're the unter mentioned. And they have the right to murder them. See? They are the exact equivalent of the German national socialist. That's exactly what they are. They claim that they're the master race that everybody else they call them goyum, which just means, you know, the N word to deny people of their humanity so that it's okay to murder them and steal their property that they covet, you know, what is happening right now in Gaza? They're bomb and killing. Isn't it? I thought it was all gone. They killed people like a hundred a week instead of a hundred a day now, something like that, maybe a hundred every couple of weeks. I saw the most horrific footage yesterday of this dead little girl in this guy's arms and still photos and and also footage of him when they killed a, a family, a woman and her children. And you know, it's so strange. Elon Musk hasn't said a goddamn thing about any of this stuff. And it's all it's all over Twitter, but our acts or whatever. Yeah. He's completely compromised. Man, SpaceX is a Pentagon contractor. But like he's also the same guy who said Trump was in the Epstein files. Yeah. He was mad and said, sorry, and deleted that. Right. That ain't the same as opposing a policy. You know, I've never seen him be brave on the issue of Palestine, ever, you know. But you know, what though? Actually, I take that back because he's brave enough just letting us see it. You know, he could go along with the, you know, absolute censorship regime and he does not. And the Israelis push so hard for that. That's true. But you know, I was thinking about this the other day. When I was a kid, I'm 49. I'm a bit older than you, but when I was a kid, they were very scared me though. VHS tapes that went around. I never did quit. That was the thing I stayed at. There were these videotapes that went around called Faces of Death. I remember this. And it was basically just pictures of like a dead body next to a contract or something. There was the one shot of that politician that says, stay back. Everyone shoots himself. But mostly, it was just dead bodies from here there. And I remember watching that. And I don't even know if I saw the whole thing. Maybe I watched it and like part of it. They had then faces of death two and three and what. And I remember there were some of the boys, you know, when we were teenagers, like, oh, man, I got to watch like all of these. It's such a big deal. I was, yeah. And I remember thinking like, man, I've had my fill. Like, honestly, I don't think I had ever seen a dead body before real one other than like Hollywood makeup, whatever. Until I saw that face as a dead. I was like, okay, like whatever. Pop my cherry on that. I'm a teenager now and not a little boy. So now I've seen what it looks like to see a dead body. I'm like, okay, I've got my little shock and I'm kind of over it. But like, I don't need to sit here and watch this over and over and over again. I get it. You know, but now like, man, compare that to the dead bodies that I've seen from the Gaza strip over the last three years. Man, I got a clumpa neurons over here somewhere that's just nothing but dead kids. So many dead kids and just horrifically maim little babies. Man, there was this one where they bond the house and half of the little girls corpse got blasted across the street and she ended up hanging from some rebar on the already destroyed building across the street. And somehow her arm ends up, she's completely dead. She's, you know, gone from the waist down. I don't even think she had legs anymore. Somehow her arm ended up like this stuck behind her head as her corpse is just hanging up there. Like, this is some straight up like biblical level evil. Dude, this is the kind of thing where if the Jewish religion was true, then God would be coming to destroy them for disobeying him again now. Like he always does. Right. Right. You shall not covet other people's things. You shall not steal. You shall not kill. That's all they do. And deliberately target women and children, you know, the, I'm sure you saw the one with the grandmother walking the little boy across the square and they snite and they murder the old grandmother and her little boy, little toddler boy too. And they think it's hilarious. They don't give a damn. Yeah. There's so many of these. I mean, pictures of guys, you know, carrying their dead children in plastic bags, they've just been blown apart and they're just trying to get them to somewhere to try to bury them. And where they're absolutely deliberately targeting children, they can try to lie and claim collateral damage all they want, but it's absolutely clear what they're doing there. You know, shooting little boys in the testicles. That's so they can't grow up to make more little amalakites. Right. Right. That's what that's about. It's genocide. That's exactly what it is as genocide. And in fact, I'll go ahead and add them. Oh, there's the grandmother you got right here. Yeah. Don't put this in the video in the show though. This will get us, we'll just show your reaction to it. Yeah. Yeah. Here they are trying to cross. I've seen this. I don't need to see this again. Oh my God, dude. Yeah, they don't give a damn deal. Yeah, it's pure evil. It is. It's pure evil. This is exactly what it is. You know, there's a, there's a story in Haaretz you can find this really easily where Israeli military officer admits he says we have a sub army of Palestinian slaves. And this is what he's talking about is real human shields. You know, they claim that Hamas fighting from within a civilian population is using them as human shields, which is somewhat true, and which insurgents almost always do unless they got a deep jungle to hide in or something. But what the Israelis do is they will take children, elderly, whatever prisoners, not Hamas bad guys they captured, but regular civilians that they capture. And they'll force them to walk through the rubble ahead of the troops, force them to go into houses first in case their booby trapped or when minds and shit. Yeah, so using them as human shields. And they do it all the time. And there's in Haaretz, one of the, yeah, there you go. We keep a sub army of Palestinian slaves as what he says. And this is from the original quote comes from Haaretz, an IDF officer told that to and is really important to note that we can enter houses without using human shields. We did it for months according to a proper entry procedure, which included sending in a robot, a drone, or a dog, this procedure proved itself, but it took time and the command wanted to achieve, wanted achievements here and now. So they use elderly women. They send in people's grandmothers to clear the house to see if it's booby trap first. The Israeli government is, they're the equivalent of the Soviet communists under Joe Stalin. That's who they are. They're monsters. I don't mean the whole population of the country. I mean the regime that rules Israel. And in fact, the public opinion polls show that the Israeli people are really horrible on all this stuff too. On the other hand, recently saying that, yeah, I think you, I think I got him from your show, actually, um, shail. Oh, yeah. Did you talk to him? Yeah. I had him in here. Yeah. He was, he was former IDF. Yeah. Yeah. He was explaining all that stuff and how they sawd him eyes their prisoners and show. Oh, it's just, oh, yeah. They're in the tortures. I mean, this is something that the guide, the, the doctor was talking about on Tucker last night. Guys forced blindfolded, shackled on their knees for two months, not allowed to even lay down. They got, you know, their handcuffed with their cuffs tied to their ankles, buying their back on their knees. And they're left like that for months. They're not allowed to even fall down and sleep. How do they eat or shit? Something cramps all over themselves face, you know, yeah. It is, you know, they torture him to death in many cases. I happened to, yeah, Ben was saying, I always want to give the civilian population the benefit of the doubt that if they had good leadership, then they'd follow good leaders too. But they'll follow bad leaders straight to hell, you know, if the, and this goes back to me as a 15 year old boy in 1991. I told you, I didn't care about the Iraqis. I didn't care about the Kuwaitis. But George Bush senior was giving me license to indulge in my blood lust, right? Yeah. It's not wrong. If the president of the United States dresses you up in a uniform and tells you to do it, right? Or, you know, you get to watch it on TV, but it's us. It's red, white and blue. It's your country, right? Doing it. So now it's okay. You can be as evil as you want. You can, you know, take great satisfaction in the destruction of the Iraqi people at the hands of the American military. And be morally right, you know, with, with eagles and yellow ribbons and American flags and whale and gending songs and whatever you need all around you to tell you that you're in the right, you're doing the right thing. It was the same thing for every 15 year old boy at my high school, the same thing for the population of Israel, the, our leaders. says that not only we do in this, but we have to do this. So hell, yeah. Otherwise, what might happen to us or whatever, you know, people rationalize just fine anything. So in other words, then if they got a prime minister in there who was not an insane psychopathic murderer, but who wanted to try to figure out how to do the right thing, they'd probably support him in that too. Yeah. No, it's kind of shocked me when he was explaining to me that the young generation of Israelis in Israel like support all this stuff and support Netanyahu. Yeah, they're getting worse, you know, back, um, geez, 15, 16 years ago now, Max Plumenthal was writing his book, Goliath, and he moved to Israel to write that book. And I interviewed him about it over there. And I remember him telling me he's like, oh, Scott, dude, you got no idea how bad it is here, man. These people, he goes the entire political spectrum in Israel is from Dick Cheney to Hitler. There is no left at all. There's a tiny little like commie movement useless and probably, you know, more harm than good anyway. Um, even though it can hardly be more commie than Israel where the government owns almost all the land in the first place. But, um, but there's essentially, you know, the libertarians there are psychopathic genocidal lunatics. The the entire political spectrum is all like completely nuts. So I mean, they've been driven that way by their own regime. I mean, this may be out of date now. I don't know. But I remember thinking certainly years ago that if they had decent leadership over there who was willing to compromise and make peace with the Palestinians and then make peace with the, you know, and normalize relations with the rest of their neighbors based on that, but they'd be fine. Right. And imagine moving to a neighborhood and not just establishing that like, hey, you know how to fight, but like going around doing nothing but pick fights with all your neighbors all the time, just to prove how much tougher you are than them. That like, okay, you got your peace through strength, you got your peace through dominance, but everybody around hates you. And how long how does that make sense for the long term when if you wanted a narrative about Israel that would make any sense at all, it would be that, hey, after World War II, during and after World War II, a lot of bad stuff happened. A lot of people got displaced. A lot of new borders were drawn. And what are you going to do? The creation of the state of Israel in 1948, hard to go back on that. It's so long ago, failed to complete whatever, whatever. But let the Palestinians at least have the West Bank and Gaza at least let them have their measly stink in 22% of what's left of Palestine. But no, you got to take all that too. That's not the West Bank. That's Judea and Samaria. We're going to take all that. We're going to take the Gaza strip and turn it into the Riviera. No Palestinians allowed. And their 2000 year old church is bombed off the face of the earth along with their mosques so that we can have it instead. And like I said, this is the whole point of the clean break. Well, we could make peace with our neighbors or we could just get America to kill them all for us. Speaking of World War II, let's jump. Let's make a big jump. Something I have no expert in at all. And I don't know much about is this whole World War II story. I know you have a show with that dude. Darrell Cooper. That's where it was. Marta made. Marta made. Yeah. Who's I haven't I haven't listened all this stuff, but I heard it's really good. And Churchill was a very bad guy during this whole thing. And a lot of people like to joke, oh, Churchill was the good guy or the bad guy Hitler was the good guy. People like to look at it through this through this lens. And there's no particular virtue in victimhood. Exactly. Exactly. Exactly. We can both be very bad guys here, Danny. You and me both. Yes. Exactly. Essentially, I think I think you made the connection with Churchill and George W Bush. He said George W Bush was the Churchill of the 21st century or something like this. Yeah. That was what they said. And this is like, this is not at all what they teach you in school. Yeah. And then yeah, I just turned that around. The joke was right. Maybe that's right. Maybe Churchill was just the George W Bush of the 20th century. Right. Only. Right. So the argument to write the history and pretend that he was something better. So I think the argument Julian made to you is like Hitler. He had the biggest GDP or whatever. And he would have gone on to an expanded forever and eventually made it to the shores of the United States. Yeah. So what really happened? Well, a couple of disclaimers. Okay. First of all, I'm not the world's greatest expert on world or two. I've read a few books about it, but I've never, I've never written about it. Harley, I think I wrote one. I think you gave a really good explanation to Pearl Harbor, too, though. Yeah. I mean, well, when I say I don't know anything about it, it's, you know, you can judge like relatively, you know, compared to what I know about other things or compared to how much other people know about the same thing or when, you know, compare how you want. But, you know, I got some useful things to say about it. But I guess I can disclaim, too, that like, they're, they could very well be things I'm overlooking or whatever is, you know, but, you know, my basic version of World War II is that it's all Woodrow Wilson's fault. And that what happened was when, by the time Woodrow Wilson got us into the first World War, the damn thing was over. You know, his whole slogan was peace without victory. But that was what was at hand. Nobody was winning, and nobody could win. The, um, the, uh, Soviets, you know, the, the commies had taken over Russia and pulled them out of the war. They were freezing to death, you know, or no, I guess, no, the commies had taken over yet. But the, the, the, um, the SARS troops were essentially, you know, getting nowhere, frozen on the battlefield on the eastern front. On the western front, the French, the British, and the Germans. Everybody was freezing. Nobody had any boots or ammo or anything, and no one was getting anywhere. The Germans are on French soil, but barely. And the whole thing is already a stalemate. It's a stalemate. And then idiot Woodrow Wilson comes and dumps hundreds of thousands of American GIs into the fight. And they tilt the balance and power so far in favor of the British and the French that they're able to force the German surrender on completely unreasonable terms. First of all, the first thing he does is he bribes Karensky, the new ruler of Russia to stay in the war. Now, the original Russian revolution was in March of 1917. Lenin and Trotsky didn't take over until October. And the reason they were able to was because Woodrow Wilson paid Karensky the interim leader millions of dollars and gave him tanks and guns and trucks and food and whatever to stay in the war. Well, I might be conflating with World War II there. Gave him not exactly full-end lease, but gave him a bunch of money and equipment to stay in the war. I guess I forget the exact extent of it, but it was enough that it convinced Karensky to stay in the war. Therefore then, when Lenin and Trotsky went to cease power in the Kami Revolution in October, one, the Karensky regime didn't have any support from the people because he wouldn't end the war. And then two, there were no soldiers there to protect St. Petersburg from the Kami, so the Kami's were able to end the war, to cease power and then end the war. But then the British and the French got to dictate such harsh terms to the Germans that not only did it lead to their economic devastation, but they kept a full blockade on Germany and starved them by the hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, starved after the war was over. And then they stripped them of all of their outlying territories as well. So you had major parts of Germany or, you know, what had been Germany and predominantly German lands were stripped away and given to Poland and to Czechoslovakia into France and whatever. So this was, there's a great book by James Powell called Wilson's War, how Woodrow Wilson's Great Blunder led to the rise of Stalin, Hitler, and World War II. And so step one is he bribed Karensky to stay in the war long enough for the Kami's to create the Soviet Union. Then he helped the British and the French stick it to the Germans so badly that they were willing to accept the rise of the Nazi party in the name of claiming revenge and reclaiming their lost territories and prestige. So this is even the way I learned it in government school as a kid was that Britain and France at their terms in the Versailles Treaty were so harsh that ended up humiliating the German people so bad that they were willing to accept the rise of Hitler and the Nazis. That's even my public school education, you know, told that much of it. And you know why? Because the rest of the story is that it's all the Senate's fault because if only the Senate had ratified the League of Nations Treaty and Versailles Treaty, then we'd have set up the original United Nations in Europe and America would have already been the dominant power in Europe and we would have been able to stop the Nazis from getting carried away as soon as they came into power earlier. So it's not Woodrow Wilson's fault for getting us into a war, it's Henry Cabot Lodge's fault for refusing to ratify the treaty which would have solved everything. So that's why they'll teach you the first part is because it comes stuck with the second that what we really needed was to join the League of Nations. But what they're admitting there is that if Woodrow Wilson and hadn't done that, there would have never been a commie USSR and there would have never been a national socialist Germany and that had never been a second world war. - Right. - He could have had that they also helped to completely destroy the Ottoman Empire and let Britain and France seize the entire Middle East create the state of Israel and the mandate in Palestine and all the rest of that. - Wow. - That all flows from Woodrow Wilson's great blunder as Powell put it. - Fuck. - So then. - Butterfly effect effect. - Yeah, and like, I can definitely recommend Darryl Cooper's, you know, he's got enemy, the Germans were part one and part two part of out. But also my colleague at the Libertarian Institute, Keith Knight has a great show where he went over, he read Winston Churchill's seven part history of World War II, which actually I'm going to inherit for my dad one day that he got from his, the giant seven volume history of World War II by Winston Churchill. - Wow. - But Keith Knight goes through there and is like, holy crap, look what he says right here, guys. And just, you know what I mean? He's reading it with that critical eye. And so essentially this story that he tells in there is completely different from the hindsight story of World War II. - Well, the Nazis were here in New York like holding conventions in shit in New York City. And like, - Well, those were Americans where we got, - Oh, those were Americans. - Yeah, those weren't the Germans. That was maybe the German American bond, but they were American. - And like, Madison Square York. - American fascist, yeah. - Oh, okay. - And you know, the Democrats make such a big deal about that, but you could fit every single American Nazi altogether in one Madison Square Garden. And that's all of them. - Right, right. - And they love to exaggerate that stuff. - I thought I was interesting. - You were explaining this book about it compiled all of the American headlines about World War II. - Oh, yeah. - Up until the point where we entered the war. - Well, it's not just American ones, but it's headlines from newspapers in, especially in England. - Oh, okay. - And it's called Human Smoke by Nicholas Baker. And it's, oh, it's so interesting because, and by the way, Darryl Martemade, he points out that there are some errors in there. It's not perfect. But what it is is, you read that book, man, Human Smoke, and it is about how they just had off ramp after off ramp, after off ramp after off ramp, and they just wouldn't take them. They are just so determined to get us into this war. And by us, I mean, the Anglo-Americans is the English leaders. And as Keith Knight pointed out in his review of Winston Churchill there, and I've heard this quote before, but where Churchill says, look, man, he can give a damn about Nazi Germany and the evil of national socialism or any of that. That wasn't it. - Yeah. - What it was about was Germany was the most powerful nation on the continent. And English policy, as Churchill says, English policy going back centuries has been, whoever is the most powerful nation on the continent, we go to war against them to keep them from dominating the whole continent, to keep the balance of power. He said, if it was the French right now, we go to war against France. If it was Russia or Poland, then we go to war against them. We're going to war against Germany because they're the most powerful. And so that's long term English policy. And he was unable to say, well, wait a minute, is that actually the best idea in this case? And especially after our experience in World War I, where we lost hundreds of millions, I almost said hundreds of thousands, millions of young guys got chewed up in this thing. We're now mechanized warfare. It's just so much different than it had been in centuries past. - Right. - Man, there's something like 20 million people died in the first World War. You want to do that again after 20 years of improvements in killing people technology? That could get really ugly Winston. Are you sure that you're just so married to this policy? There's no wiggle room in it at all. No, it must be. And this is in Pat Buchanan's book, it's called Churchill Hitler and the Unnecessary War. And the quote, unnecessary war is from Churchill. Only he's saying it was unnecessary 'cause we should have just done it earlier or better or whatever. But he also said after the war, in the rise of Stalin, Soviet Union and the Cold War, which it was really Churchill himself went to Truman's hometown in Missouri and gave his speech about the Iron Curtain and how the inaugurating the Cold War. And he said, "Oh, look, I guess we stuck the wrong pig." And which, think about like this, okay? Hitler and Stalin, national socialism and international communism. This is like matter and anti-matter, right? These guys are going to war, right? It's almost certain they're going to war. There's a huge part of what led to the rise of the Nazis in the first place was the existence of the commies in the east and the whole of the more in Ukraine and everything else. Right, this was almost inevitable, right? Virtually inevitable. And I think Hitler saw that as well and he wanted to ally with England against the communists. Churchill in effect, well, actually not even Churchill, Neville Chamberlain before Churchill became prime minister. Neville Chamberlain, of course, had declared peace in our time and that he had an agreement from Hitler about Czechoslovakia. He didn't take as much as he'd taken, but he wouldn't take the rest. Then he went ahead and took the rest. And then Neville Chamberlain, the lesson for all of us in history is that England and America should have invaded Germany in 1938, right? Right. But what actually happened was he went into an emotional fit. Neville Chamberlain. Neville Chamberlain because he was humiliated by this, right? So he threw a fit and went and gave a war guarantee to Poland and said to Poland, if Germany attacks you, we will jump in on your side. Well, the thing about that is Poland was ruled by fascists. They were called the colonels and they were right wing, you know, nationalist virtual Hitler rights themselves. And they were in process of negotiating over Danzig and whether the Germans would get a corridor to this formally German, yeah, over this formally German city of Danzig that had been awarded to Poland after World War I. Well, once they got the war guarantee from England, they told Hitler screw you. Now we don't have to negotiate with you. And so he said, no screw you. I'm taking Danzig one way or the other and invaded Poland, but what happened? Because he knew that England had made this deal with Poland. Then Hitler went and made a deal with Stalin, the Molotov ribbon-trob pack, the Hitler Stalin pack that said let's both invade Poland and divide it and have peace between us because he knew that England is now going to declare war on him and France, along with England, is going to declare war on him. So was that mean? That means he just has to fight all the Western democracies first. He has to destroy France and Belgium and Denmark and then fight the commies anyway. But just destroy all the Western democracies first. And in Pabbie Cannon's book, he says that when Neville Chamberlain gave this war guarantee to Poland, that his own foreign minister, Lord Gray, said, are you crazy and said he should be locked in an insane asylum for giving him a guarantee? Yeah, for giving Poland a war guarantee because of course Britain had no ability to protect Poland anyway. You might remember at the end of the war, Poland got turned over to Stalin and was enslaved until 1991, right, 1990, right? So they weren't saved by England and that war, even with America in the war, we'd have had to start the war with the Soviet Union as soon as we sat Berlin. We'd have had to declare war on Moscow if we were going to liberate Poland. We weren't going to go that far. So the English are passing out war guarantees that America's supposed to cash, but we can't even follow up anyway. All we could do is liberate France and the Western half of Germany, the Communist even got the Eastern half of Germany. So and 60 million people died. And because it's the worst thing that ever happened, you're supposed to believe it's the most inevitable thing that had to happen. But like, I don't know, man, maybe not. And especially when you brought up Pearl Harbor, the only way that FDR could get America into the Second World War was by lying us into war, by setting up those boys to die. And, you know, I interviewed Robert Stinette is the guy that, you know, proved this case. He was an American naval veteran of World War II and he even justified what FDR did and still believed in the war and still believed that FDR had no choice. I interviewed the guy multiple times about it. - Really? - He wrote the book Day of Deceit, the truth about FDR and Pearl Harbor. It said, they didn't just break the diplomatic codes. They broke all of the military codes. They knew everything the Japanese were doing. And the White House kept that information from Admiral Kimmel in general short at Hawaii. Yeah, it was Admiral Kimmel in general short. And they got screwed, they got blamed. But it was FDR who, you know, in fact, what Stinette found is not only that they had broken all the codes, but he also found the McCallum memo, which is the eight point plan to provoke Japan into attacking us first. - What? - It's labeled A through H. These were all the different things that we have to do to get them to attack. And so one was leave all our fleet out at Pearl Harbor instead of bringing them home to San Diego. Then was surfacing submarines off the coast of Tokyo. Then was increasing support for Chinese resistance against the Japanese. Then it was the oil embargo and the steel embargo. And all of this was made to provoke them into hitting us. That was widely did it. - So we could use that as an excuse. excuse us, the secretary of war, Stimson wrote in his diary by all means the Japanese must be maneuvered into firing the first shot. And then they use that. They set up 3,000 American sailors to die so they could get us into the war in Europe. And so they did. And then Hitler, by the way, Hitler declared war on the United States. So the FDR wouldn't have been able to do that unless he made that absolute idiot blunder, which he did because, and it's funny because I'd always heard that there was just such a stupid mistake, but there was a reason that he did it. The reason that he did it was because he wanted the, if he declared war on the United States, he wanted the Japanese to then declare war on the Soviet Union. And then that way the Soviets would have to divide their forces in which would benefit Germany. But the Japanese did not declare war on the Soviet Union. So Hitler rolled those dice and lost. He provoked America into entering the European war, but he didn't convince the Japanese to enter the war against the USSR and the East. And so screwed himself in that way. But that's the explanation of why he declared war on the United States. But there's no question of FDR's trees in there. They knew the attack was coming, they left all the guys out there, had them bunch all their ships up together to protect against sabotage when they were just setting them up perfect to be sung. It was such a lucky coincidence that all our aircraft carriers were out at sea that day and it was all the obsolete old World War I ships that got sung. 3500 guys killed. That's fucking insane. It's crazy. And it's like the shit just keeps repeating itself. And hey, as long as we're talking about Pearl Harbor, let's talk about Iran. So Donald Trump himself compared his attack on Iran to Pearl Harbor. Remember he had the Japanese Prime Minister in his office and she says, why didn't you tell us about that you were going to attack Iran? He goes, why didn't you tell us about Pearl Harbor? This is like making the direct comparison. And then, but in our sneak attack on them, we didn't just hit and kill 3,000 of their military guys. We hit two schools and killed an Oklahoma City bombing worth of children. 167 something or I guess they lowered is like 150 something. Mostly girls, some teachers and boys as well, but almost all girls, they were killed. Imagine that Alpha P Merrill building, that Oklahoma City Federal Building, only all of them were kids. Instead of just 20 in the daycare there, that the whole building was a daycare. That was what America killed in our Pearl Harbor sneak attack on Iran here. And it was the one school. And then there was a different place like a gymnasium where they were doing volleyball practice, a girls volleyball practice. They killed another 21 there. And they killed Iran's FDR, their supreme leader since 1989. Right. And his family was with him. And his family too. His wife, his daughter and his father. Oh, sorry, no, killed I told and left the son alive, killed his wife and daughter. But then, but then also, imagine if America had been a Catholic country and FDR, it also been our Pope too. That's what we did. Right. We did a Pearl Harbor attack, a sneak attack in the middle of negotiations against a country that was not threatening us on behalf of a third nation, based on some ridiculous lie they're making nuclear weapons. And then not only do we kill all their military heroes, we slaughter their daughters by the hundreds and kill their Pope slash president. What would we do in that scenario? Dude, I mean, yeah, as I was saying on the Rogan show, if that was our story of Pearl Harbor, then our story of World War II would be that we kept nuking them until we ran out of nukes and all the Japanese were dead. Right. Right. They still justified nuking them based on just that's what they get for attacking us at Pearl Harbor, where they killed almost all combatants. I think maybe all combatants died. And then we nuke them and kill 75,000 people in an instant in Nagasaki, 100,000 at Hiroshima. And we go, that's what you get for hitting Pearl Harbor. If they had hit Pearl Harbor and slaughtered a bunch of kids and they hit DC and killed at the yard, and we did America would own Japan now. We'd have killed them all. Yeah, you're right. But whatever we do, whatever we want in those Iranians are just going to have to lump it. And isn't it true? Also, I didn't Trump say like we keep trying to negotiate, but are the negotiators keep getting killed? The Iranian people on the Iranian side, whoever we're talking to, they keep getting killed. So we have to keep it a super secret now. And what was funny was like the implication was supposed to be what? That they're being killed by the Iranian horror line or spray that no, they're being killed by the Israelis because the Israelis who were targeting anybody that we're talking to. Yeah, that's not the script itself. Trump said we got a deal. We're negotiating based on their 11 point plan. And we have a ceasefire. And Israel immediately ramped up their slaughter in 11, 11 in order to say your ceasefire does not include us. And Trump said, Israel is forbidden. All capital letters forbidden from bombing Lebanon anymore. They just kept bombing them and pay any mind whatsoever. You know, this is what led Tucker Carlson to say that Trump has evidently somehow been enslaved to the will of Netanyahu. How can the ruler of the world superpower be sabotaged and dictated to by the prime minister of some crappy little Maryland-sized state over in the Middle East? We don't, you know, I don't know if anybody knows exactly the mechanism here, but he's in charge, not our guy. Yeah. Yeah. This seems as true. It doesn't make sense that there's like this huge invisible leverage where we can do all of this stuff for the small client state. Like they must have a huge, huge invisible hammer that we just can see. You may be right about the blackmail there, man, because you know, they had all kind of leverage, all the exact same political leverage on W Bush and on Barack Obama on, you know, Joe Biden should have let him get away with murder. You think they had leverage on Obama too? I mean, just as much weight as the lobby has, but Obama, Bush and Obama both, and with Robert Gates as their secretary of defense in both cases, they told the Israelis, no, I mean, A. Hood, Omar really pushed in 2007. And Bush goes, no, this is before the N.I.E. even came out. Bush told him, forget it, pal, we're not doing it. And, you know, Robert Gates gave this interview recently where he said, oh, Netanyahu told me all this same stuff in the Obama years. Oh, it'll be easy. All we got to do is hit them. They'll fall right down and we'll get whatever we want and whatever. And he goes, no, that's, and I told Netanyahu then, that's not true. That's completely crazy. And we're not doing it. And so they at least had the stone somehow for whatever, you know, political capital they had saved up to say no. I mean, you might remember when Obama passed the nuclear deal. He gave a speech. It was pretty hardcore in terms of these sorts of politics where he said in his speech, he goes, now I've heard the prime minister of Israel and his objections loud and clear and duly noted. However, my job is securing the national interest in the United States of America. And you're just going to have to suck it up. Netanyahu, you know what I mean? But that was like tough. That was probably the hardest thing you ever did. And then he had to say that specifically, like, look, man, I'm not ignoring you, but I'm just saying, this is my solution to your problem. And it's going to have to be good enough for you. Trump will not talk to Netanyahu that way. He will not. I mean, that picture, I don't know what's going on. It's a great meme of him, you know, pulling out the chair and pushing in the chair. Yeah, who like, it's crazy, man, even in that table. Yeah, even that New York Times story where they're in a situation room. Trump refuses to sit at the head of the table. He sits at the side of the head of the table across from Netanyahu as it equal in his own situation room in the White House. Dude, it's so crazy. It's a crazy conspiracy that's just spiraling out of control. And it's crazy because it's all right in our faces. It's all available for us to see if we have the eyes to see it and the ears to hear it. And it's just like no explanation. We'll give you no reasonable explanation, like even with the Epstein stuff, like, we'll drop this all in your laps and we'll be back shit, but you'll be able to figure it out. And we're not going to give you any answers. It's just here. Here it is. By the way, here's some UFOs by what while you're at it. Go play with that. Right. Yep. Yeah. I mean, it's like, it's an insult. It's an insult to us. There were people who even thought, and this may have played into it, like one of the reasons they decided to launch the war was just to get the Epstein stuff out of the news. There was so much in those files to be, you know, waited through. So many independent journalists who were just, where's all the footage to? We know there was cameras. We know there was a whole, we had, we had witnesses that told us that there was whole entire rooms, half the size of this room, stacked with servers and monitors that were monitoring everything. So where's all that shit? FBI's got it. By the way, you know, this barely got any coverage. I was so busy moving and everything. I did not follow up, but Math Taibi wrote a thing at racket news about how they found this whole other collection of FBI files, a whole like secret parallel stash of FBI documents like files on everything and everything. What? Yeah. This is like, I don't know what, four weeks ago or something. And it had slipped out. Someone had admitted, that they had like this parallel filing system. And somebody followed up like, wait, what? What was that again? You know, was that, you find that? Yeah, there you go. FBI Secret Stash found the uncovered for a generation. The FBI has kept a second set of books called Prohibited Access Files after a long flight. They're finally being examined. - So I don't know what all was found in there, but this is the stuff, man, I betcha. I betcha there's stuff on the Oklahoma bombing and Elohim City and stuff in there, dude. You know, I interviewed an FBI agent who worked on the Oklahoma bombing case. And this was, I don't know if you remember this, but right before McVeigh was executed in the summer of 2001, Dan Rather, from CBS News, interviewed some FBI agents who said that they had worked on the McVeigh case and or the Oklahoma bombing case. And they knew, they could testify that information that they had investigated was never turned over to defense. So they actually postponed McVeigh's execution for like six weeks while they found a bunch of boxes of stuff to turn over to his defense attorneys. And then they turn around and just do it in the evening. But I interviewed one of those FBI agents myself. His name was Rico Heida and he said that even then, after they turned over all the boxes, the stuff that he investigated, which was about the white supremacist at Elohim City, McVeigh's friends out there in Eastern Oklahoma, that none of that stuff ever turned up was ever disclosed. So that's the kind of thing that makes me think, what's in these prohibited access files? All the stuff that we don't want Danny to ever see goes over here in this separate drawer. You can learn this, but you can't learn that. - Right, and speaking of prohibited files that keep away from everybody, what about the whole joke Kent thing where he was trying to get access to the whole Charlie Kirk thing to see if there's any foreign influence. Never even mentioned Israeli. He just said, "I want to see if there's any foreign influence." And they said, "You don't get access to any of this shit." This is before they allegedly said that he was blocked out of everything, or lost his clearance. - Right. - Well, which is just like fucking crazy, man. - Yeah. - Which makes you question the whole Trump the shooting thing, too. - Yeah, which, I mean, Tucker did another great documentary on that, and if you saw that, Tucker did a really-- - Oh, yeah, yeah. In fact, I just published a book by Ken Silva. You might know Ken Silva from headline USA. He's a really great investigative reporter. And we just published his book. It's our 20th book at the Libertarian Institute. It's called The Trump Assasination Plots. And he goes in deep deep dives of everything we know about, about the kid in Butler, Pennsylvania, about the guy down at the golf club in Florida, and then plus also debunking the fake Iranian plots against Trump, which are total bullshit. - Right. - And, yeah, it's our 20th book at the Institute, The Trump Assasination Plots. And he goes into all that detail, what we know and what we don't know about all that. And like, I think in the case, especially of the kid in Butler, Pennsylvania, you know, they lied, right? They said that he didn't have this online, he didn't have an online identity at all in whatever and then, but Tucker found it, when he showed all of that stuff, right? And look, I think this is purely speculative, right? Like, I don't know this, but I'm just saying, it does make perfect sense that whoever, whatever intelligence agencies or whatever sophisticated actors could have software that can find people who are making unhinged threats online and figure out how to infiltrate their lives then and give them bad ideas and push 'em toward things that they otherwise might not do. I think the possibility is certainly there in the case of Charlie Gert too. Like, I don't think I really have much reason to doubt like who pulled the trigger there. You know, they say, we'll find out at the trial, but they say his own dad turned him in. Dad's don't turn in innocent sons on the-- - I heard that that was all bullshit. I heard that the guy never actually, I think I heard, I don't know where I heard this, I don't know if this is just, I'm talking on my ass right here, but I thought somebody told us recently in the podcast that someone actually got a hold of his dad who refused to talk to anybody in the beginning and now he's saying, all that's bullshit none of that actually happened. - I don't know about that, but even assuming that the accused is the guy that pulled the trigger, it still is plausible that there are ways to identify people online who are that close to the edge and then figure out ways to infiltrate them and push them and give them bad ideas and even capabilities and whatever and get them to do things, so I wouldn't be surprised at all to find out. And the same thing with this guy Ruth, I mean, everybody knows that he was a cook, and he'd been to-- - Which guy's this? - The recent one? - No, the guy that at the club and at the golf course. - Oh, the golf course, right? - He had been to Ukraine and was known as a loon in Ukraine, had maybe succeeded in recruiting a couple of mercenaries from Afghanistan and go fight there, but like, I guess, believeably, they immediately started covering their ass and saying that this CIA officer who was over there said that when she came home, she told Customs, look out for this guy, he's a cook, he's over there and he needs to be, you know, whatever, whatever, or she told the FBI that or something like that. And people mistakenly said that he was in a black rock commercial and that was supposed to be so suspicious that so was the-- - Why are they all on black rock commercial? - But they're not though. - Oh, they're not? - Yeah, no, the pencil of any kid, he was just a high school kid and it was nothing, has nothing to do with the assassination at all. - Butler kid? - The Butler kid. - He wasn't in a black rock commercial? - Yeah, he was, but as a high school kid, years ago, that has nothing to do with anything, right? It was only suspicious if they were both in black rock commercials, but they weren't. - Oh, the other guy wasn't. - The other guy wasn't. You know what he was in? He was in a video that was filmed by the Azov Battalion, who are America's sock puppet Nazi brigades in Ukraine fighting the Russians. - Right, right. - And so that was what that video was. It wasn't a black rock video, it was an Azov Battalion video. - Oh my God. - And so if that guy's a cook and he's a nut and he's already convinced that Trump wants to sell out our heroic Ukrainians against the villainous Russians and whatever, then it doesn't take much probably for someone who has covert action authority in government to take a guy like that and push him a little bit. - Yeah, I was like the Lee Harvey Oswald story. - Yeah, you know where Trump's gonna be on Wednesday, right? You know, it's gonna be, you know, playing rounds on this course here and what. And when, now I'm speculating there, it's also perfectly reasonable to believe that some loser can get a gun and reach out and touch someone with it. I mean, that's, people really don't like that fact, but that's actually what's really good about guns, right? Is someone who is weak can be equalized with someone who was strong, little old lady can shoot dead a crackhead and protect her own life. That happens, right? But that also means that some jackass can kill someone great without much effort, right? And then, you know, people get upset about that 'cause it doesn't feel right, but it is possible at least, which I'm not trying to jump to too many conclusions on any of those. And I'm willing to speculate a little bit, but it is also true that, like, firing a rifle at a target, inked that hard, you know, hold your breath and squeeze the trigger or whatever, right, you know? Don't pull it, squeeze it. - Right. - Whatever. - It's just crazy, man. That, that, that Butler shooting was bizarre beyond belief. I mean, just the fact that he was able to get past all the secret service people, the sniper people didn't see him. There was like, if that, that one just, - Or they did, but they held their fire. They didn't just immediately identify him and take him out. - They were yelling back and forth, right? - Yeah, they were talking about, what should I do? Like, no, you're supposed to take this shot. - That was weird. - Yeah, that was weird. - That was very weird. The more time that goes by. - You know, one thing is though, too, is you, you know, like I remember some of the reporting out of there, right away, and I ever actually had a chance to read the latest version of Ken's book yet, but there did seem to be a lot of like, just total jackassery on the part of the local cops there, too. - Yeah. - We're like, well, I wasn't supposed to be looking out that window. Jimmy was supposed to be looking out that window or whatever, and they're ultimately just a bunch of deputy sheriffs. They are not good at that job. They said the one guy was looking out the window, but if he'd only actually put his head out the window, he would have been able to see just stuff like that, which, you know, maybe those are convincing enough lies, but they also are like, because they're plausible enough that they could really just be the simplest explanation as well, you know? - Yeah, for sure. - So I don't know. - Well, Scott, thank you so much, man, for giving me this education on American history. I really appreciate it. - I've had a lot of fun. Hey, show me my books again. - Yeah, yeah, yeah, provoked. This is the most recent one. - Yeah. - This is the phone book on the history of Russia Ukraine. Is that Russia Ukraine? - Russia Ukraine in the whole background. - Russia Ukraine in America's peddling, meddling. - Yep. - I'm sure there's some great Victoria Newland quotes in here. - Oh, there's a lot. - We're gonna get a lot to talk about Russia Ukraine. That would be a whole nother podcast. - That would be a whole nother show. - We could definitely do that. - And enough already, time to end the war on terrorism. - Russia, and then look, man, I am-- - Everywhere books are sold? - Yeah, mostly Amazon, but yeah, you can find them wherever. And I have a new project which is the Scott Horton Academy of Foreign Policy and Freedom, which is basically me walking you through both of these books and doing like the deep, deep dive on all that. And that's all at ScottHortonAcademy.com. - Excellent, man. Dude, your memory of this stuff is so goddamn impressive. Do you have like a photographic memory or something like that? How do you, you little call names and times and like all this stuff, it's insane. - Yeah. - Never talk to anyone with this depth of memory. call on history. That's funny. Um, I, uh, I was joking on Twitter. How do I know all this? People ask me, how do you know all this stuff? These aren't memories. They've been dead. I love it. Help some stick. That's a good way to see your brain. Cool, man. Well, we'll link all this stuff below. And, uh, thanks again, dude. Absolutely. And hey, everybody on YouTube, check out my two shows, the Scott Horton show and provoked with Darryl Cooper as well. Hell yeah. We'll link it all below for folks. All right. Good night, folks.