Go back

4 Ways Creators are Making Money in 2026

46m 55s

4 Ways Creators are Making Money in 2026

The transcription discusses the evolving landscape of advertising in the creator economy, focusing on how brands and creators can collaborate more effectively. Colin and Samir highlight that creator spend is expected to hit $39 billion by 2026, underscoring the importance of these partnerships. They identify four primary ways brands engage with creators: as talent (featuring creators in traditional ads, like Lexus using Colin and Samir in pre-rolls), as distribution (creators promoting brands to their audiences, often leading to a "messy middle" when authenticity is lost), through integrated content (brands enhancing creator videos without disrupting the narrative), and through world-building (brands creating narratives around creators, such as Jake Shane’s fitness journey with Alo). The hosts argue that the key to successful partnerships is honesty and context, whether through comedic ad reads (e.g., David Dobrik) or contextually native talent (e.g., YouTubers in YouTube ads). They also note that brands often struggle with giving up control, leading to discomfort, but when done right—like Huckberry’s subtle integration with Goth Babe—these collaborations can feel natural and effective. The episode emphasizes that the creator economy’s growth hinges on brands and creators working together without losing authenticity or audience trust.

Transcription

8450 Words, 45240 Characters

English
Hey, what's up, everyone? Welcome back to the Colin and Samir Show. On today's episode, we're talking about ads, mainly because we made one. We made a bunch, actually, but not how you would think, not historically what you'd think of when we say ads. So in this episode, we're going to talk about four ways that creators and brands are working together and talk a lot about the future of advertising in the creator economy. If you're in the creator economy, you got to love ads. It's kind of the thing. The future of the creator economy and its growth, in my opinion, hinges on the ability of brands and creators to work better together. Why are you yelling? Because I really mean it. Yeah, you feel very passionate, you feel very passionate. Yeah. All right. If you're into ads, you're going to like this episode. All right. Let's talk about ads. Honestly, one of my favorite things. Yeah, actually, not even kidding. Yeah, it's something I deeply love and something that is the economic engine of the internet. It's really interesting to go back in time and go like advertising is what enabled the internet to be free and the economic engine for creators. The majority of creators make the majority of their money from brand partnerships. So what's interesting and why this is coming to life right now and why we're having this conversation so much is in part because of a deal we just did that we're going to talk about. But also, we're about a month out from can lions. And coming home from can lions, I wrote up these observations of what I saw at this festival of advertising and what was deemed as like the Super Bowl for creators. And we were in a lot of closed door meetings there with major brands. And there was this like palpable anxiety around solving creator. Yeah, needing feeling like they need to work with creators because of their cultural impact, because of even just the buzz word right now of creators. But feeling like there is also a bit of discomfort in giving up control to creators, right? Giving our brand voice to these people who we haven't met yet. We don't speak the same language all the time. Especially as the brands get bigger, right? Like the bigger the brand, the more complexity with that. But the headline that I wrote was that every brand is trying to solve creator, but they have a very narrow view of what creator means. And so coming out of it, I wrote down four different ways that brands can engage with creators and that are engaging with creators to kind of clarify what this modern advertising industry is with independent creators. Like what do they represent to the ad world? Because some numbers creator spend is projected to hit $39 billion in 2026. Total global advertising spend is going to hit a trillion dollars, which is crazy. But $39 billion to creators is insane. Yeah, when I heard that, I thought it, I thought it candidly was a mistake because I just can't even comprehend and understand a number of that large. Let alone within our space because you and I, I feel like I know every creator or no of. And I'm like, wait, how is this $39 billion being disseminated? Yeah. But I don't think that's true. I think if you go out globally and explore the definition of creator, it's actually, there's a lot. Yeah. Right? And because if just our friends were getting that $39 billion, I think we would know. We would know. We would know. We would know. Some of them are getting large portions of that. Yeah, but or they're just not telling us. Now, in this episode, we're also joined by Connor, producer on our team, because we need a vantage point of somebody who's a consumer of advertising on the internet, not a creator of advertising on the internet. I say this because again, you and I are fans of advertising. We have a bias towards advertising. And I have a no relationship with a brand deal from a creator that isn't coming from the perspective of me analyzing it. Of how it was done. As a producer of advertising. So Connor, welcome. Thank you. Good to be here. You like ads, Connor? I do. I like good ads. I like when ads really work with creators and aren't just like the, we bought a slot in your video. Talk about us for a little bit. All right. We'll get into that. It's a fair point, but I would say I actually, as a fan of podcasting, I don't mind the host red ad. Yeah. I don't mind it either. I think there's a messy middle. Yeah. Or you're either the 60 second integration into a podcast, something that is not necessarily visual. It is audio. And you still need to have a level of authenticity to it. Or you are so deeply integrated that the brand is making the video that much better. Like they are truly without a doubt at a glance. You look at it and you go, there's no way this video could be as good as it was without that brand getting involved. Yeah. And there's an expectation with watching podcasts that that's just kind of how things are. And I'm expecting from watching a video essay. I don't want a podcast style ad read because it just like takes me out of the video that the creator spent whatever five minutes a minute in getting me immersed in the first place. Let me get your opinion on this. What do you think about podcasters who read the integration off of a piece of paper and they look at it while the video is on them? It's completely depends on if they're funny or not. Yeah. Okay. So if they're comedy podcasters and they can make it funny, no problem. Dobrik actually David Dobrik just did an ad read recently for, I think it was prize picks. And he's throwing a party at his house and everyone's like pretty drunk. And he has to deliver this ad read and he starts trying to deliver it and he has a piece of paper to deliver it. Yeah. And he can't do it. And so then they start bringing in friends to pick up where he left off and they all also can't do it because they're too drunk. And by the end, like they finally nail it. And it's one of the most memorable ad reads I've seen recently because it was comedic. It's like he is being abundantly clear that he has to hit these talking points, but he makes it like a bit. And I think when you're comedic, you can do that and it can land and it will stick in my mind. I think the rule is here, you have to face the brand integration head on. When you end up in the messy middle, it's because you're sort of trying to sneak the brand deal in or act like you don't have to read these deliverables. Right? I think the podcast integration when it's funny is great because they're just facing it head on. They're not trying to hide anything. And the full directly integrated, this whole video is made better with the brand is also okay because it's honest. Yes. Yes. I agree with that. So let's talk about a new form of advertising because we just did it. It's been a really interesting experience. So we announced this past week that Lexus is the official car of Colin and Samir. And specifically inside of this deal, we have made four ads that will run as pre-roll across YouTube. Lexus is also sponsoring four videos on our YouTube channel. And the first campaign just rolled out. So if you're watching YouTube without premium, very possible, you'll see our Lexus ads. But the first campaign has eight unique assets attached to it. Everything from like a very cinematic hero asset, all the way down to something we shot with your iPhone, just like your iPhone in the car. And this is a new form of advertising for creators that I think actually if you talk to all of our friends, everybody wants to do this because we're making ads that are just ads. Like they just play as ads before YouTube videos. They're not integrated into our content. They are purely ads. Well, I think it removes the tension from what is normally the brand integration because you say this a lot, the audience is the boss, right? So in our world, on our channel, our audience is the boss. They are the only people that can fire us. So there are a level of restrictions that we need to put on what we make to make sure that they're happy at the end of the day. And we make these ads for Lexus. Yes, our audience is taken into account, but their audience is the boss because it's on their platforms. You know what I mean? Like it is running. Yeah, we are. And there's a liberation to that. Yeah, there's a liberation to the context in which it's running. But I don't think we, there's no version of this where we're like not considering our audience, right? No, it is us and something we think our audience would like. Yeah. But the ads that we made, there's no world where those just get released on our channel. No, no world. Yeah, it's a different, it's a different, it's a, it's a completely different context and a completely different creative and storytelling constraints that have to do with the brand and the car, not our audience and the medium. Yeah. Like the storytelling constraint is we have to try and get someone to not skip this pre-roll. Mm-hmm. Right? Like that's the goal. Yeah. Don't skip the pre-roll. It reminded me a lot of a short form piece of content, the way you sort of ideate and think about a short form piece of content where someone is not clicking and choosing you. You are showing up in front of them. Yeah. And they have a moment to make a decision if they want to stay. So this is a movement that I think we're going to start to see a lot more of with YouTube, right? So YouTube is massive advertising platform, a lot of video advertising. Now you have creators on the platform that are more relevant to the ecosystem that are good at making content for YouTube, but have not yet really been tasked with making the ads for the platform. That is changing now. We're getting a lot more engagement from YouTube to explore these types of relationships. And the way this came together, It's kind of a bizarre but funny story. I told a story of auditioning for Alexis Commercial on this show, on an episode with Nick D. Giovanni, and it's like a nightmarish audition story. You can go back and list do it. I'm not going to tell the full story right now. I'll put it to the chase. Basically, Samir had to act something out. He did it. The director then said to him, "Okay, whenever you're ready." And I had lying that he didn't even notice the subtlety of Samir's acting. And that's the moment Samir knew he wasn't going to be in that Lexus ad. It's what everyone's nightmares are made of. It's like that moment where you perform something in front of a bunch of people and they're like, "Did you do it?" And you're like, "I did it." I'm glad you brought that full circle because everyone's nightmares are made of auditioning for Alexis Commercial, but I understand what you're saying. You know what I'm saying? It's like you're called on in class and you're unprepared. Yeah, you're unprepared. And yeah, although I thought I was prepared and I did it, but I just didn't do it. Anyway, it doesn't matter. Tell this story we laugh and our SPM Andrew Leonard at YouTube, which is strategic partner manager. Yes, which is a very unique thing about YouTube. Very unique that we have like this level of engagement with someone at YouTube. Basically at the same time, sees that Lexus is looking for creators to work with. You know, the question gets asked, are there any creators who have relevancy to Lexus or a relevant story with Lexus? He tells this funny story to the team and then we get invited to pitch a campaign to Lexus. And this is very different. This is almost us as a extremely boutique creative agency. We're pitching a campaign, a premise to them of again, how we're going to make ads for the car. And it was a series of like a lot of meetings, building decks, building like an actual campaign strategy around this. And we got it. And it was awesome. And I think why we're going to see more of this is because of a couple of reasons. One, creators want to make these ads. We are all fans of YouTube. We want the ecosystem of YouTube to be cooler. Right. So like when I'm watching YouTube and I see an ad, I want that ad to be cool and more entertaining. And more entertaining. Like I just want it to be better. And if I saw Ryan Trayhand in an ad, I'd be like, awesome. And the second reason is a contextually native talent. So we talked about this in a newsletter. But when you're watching the NFL, the state farm ad has Patrick Mahomes in it during the NFL season. That contextually makes sense. I'm watching the game. Oh, there's Patrick Mahomes. It's an NFL player. He's in the state farm ad. Same logic applies to YouTube. I'm watching YouTube. I want to see a YouTuber in the ad. It's more contextually native. And it makes you stop. Got a comment on LinkedIn from Lindsey Ruffin. He said, for the folks at Lexus, I saw the ad. And only reason I didn't skip it was because of featured Colin and Samir. So I was actually interested in watching it. When it pops up again, I'll watch it again because it features people I actually know, pair of socially, and care about. I hope to see Lexus vehicles play a role in supporting these guys. Okay. That's a separate thought. So that is one of the ways that we're going to go through that. Creators can work with brands, which is talent. Yes. Right. We are talent in these ads. You've probably seen this. Specifically, this happens actually a lot around the Super Bowl. Whether it's eye show speed, he showed up in the meta Oakley ad, Mr. Beast and the Salesforce ad. Mr. Beast in that instance was talent. He also directed that commercial. But talent is something that you will see brands engage. You will see brands engage with creators in this way. More and more. So yeah, back to the things that we saw in these meetings was a lot of brands who have their own perspective on advertising and their brand and their problem that they faced with creator marketing is that there's a lot of there's this energy of the creator knows best, which in a lot of instances is true. But they go here creator X go make a video for your Instagram about my brand and it comes back and it doesn't really reflect the brand and the creative director of the brand or the marketing team is like, what is this? This doesn't make any sense for us. And so the comfort level is more like, hey, we know how to make our ads. We want to make our ads in a certain way. Let's just pull relevant faces into this advertising. It's just there's a hesitancy for a lot of brands to treat creators in the same way that they treat celebrities. But it's a very simple way to engage with creators and a lot of creators enjoy this a lot. Adobe Firefly did this campaign where they featured Eric, Kanegra, Dion and I think two or three other creators. And we talked to Kanegra about it and she was like, it was so cool to show up on set, act and leave and leave. And the ads are good. They're really good ads. And when they come across my screen on YouTube, I'm stoked. I'm like, that's a cool ad about air act making YouTube videos or Kanegra making YouTube videos. It's really well done. So I think if you're a brand exploring ways to work with creators and you feel like the kind of classic creator marketing thing isn't working. Just pulling a creator into your world as talent is it's a way to just not break your system. It's like our system is already to make ads. Yeah. If you're a brand and you still want control, bring the creator to your universe. Yeah. Now I think you do have to still explore and ask the creator if the creative is good and if it'll work and get their opinion on it. You can absolutely pull them into your role. The discomfort comes from the fact that the number one way that brands and creators engage with each other is creator as distribution. That's historically how all creators have worked. Yeah. Work with us to reach our audience. Yes. That's the story of who it is. As a creator, work with us and you can reach our audience. What it is shifting towards is work with us and we will help you reach your audience better. Right. I think there's another level with creators is talent with creator selection. When you can find somebody who fits into the universe, you're trying to sell like this example with I show speed and expedia because there is no one that exemplifies traveling in like unique experiences right now than I show speed. It's like the difference between Timothy Shalame doing a call she had when it's like it's a big face and it's kind of creative, but it just doesn't really make sense for him other than him just having distribution or likeness, not even distribution. But I show speed. It fits his brand and he's a really good brand partner because you can easily become part of that universe. That's a really good point. It makes me think of Rick Rubin in the polymarket ad where it felt so bizarre. To watch that like polymarket which is you know prediction market feels like an edge of gambling and to see a guy who's like really made his name on the purity of creative work. Mixed in with that was like really jarring. There was so much discomfort with that ad because it was a really well done beautiful ad, but it felt like it was missing that core element of honesty with the person at the heart of the ad. I think another good example of this and one that I wrote down is a really like a good brand deal that I've seen recently is Jake Shane and Al O. So Jake Shane basically he's a podcaster community. If you don't know who he is got extremely in shape and post of these pictures of getting in shape reminds me again like fitness transformation is like inherently interesting. We'll always be interesting, but seeing somebody transform their body is interesting. It was like fully done in partnership with Al O. And then now there's like a multi part series coming out with Al O. And I think I hope Al O makes ads around this around his like before and after. Because just good, it's just good creative like I would watch that pre roll. I think it's really simple and I think also world building is where this works extremely well where I am following the narrative of Jake and he's talking about getting in shape and then he's in shape and it's like I did this in the Al O Jim with Al O trainers like yep. That's that to me is is really great when you can see the whole world come together like that. And the four part series is on Al O's platform. Yes. Al O's world. It's their universe. It's branded their way. It's not branded Jake Shane or how his shows look and so it feels comfortable. So on these two ways that we're talking about creators as distribution creators as talent. The main distinction of why they're so different is because when a brand steps into our world and our job is to distribute their message to our audience, we have to hold the consideration of our audience as number one. So whatever your brand guidelines are, whatever your considerations are, it's going to get kind of uncomfortable if they don't mesh fully with our considerations of our audience. And then we're going to try and fit it into this world that may or may not work. That's where what you said in the beginning, like the messy middle gets really messy here because a host red ad is clean clear the audience expects it. They know how our ad product works there. But if we're trying to get it out of the way, we're going to get it out of the way. trying to customize something that doesn't feel representative of our relationship with our audience, it's not going to be good for anyone, basically. So I'll give two examples where I think it really works here with creators as distribution one on a very low lift and of the spectrum one on the very high lift. Starting with low lift, you know, I watch Goth Babe. Yeah. So he's a musician, but he also has this outdoor YouTube channel. He did a integration with Huckberry, which is a men's clothing retailer. But now he just wears the Huckberry hat throughout all of his episodes. And whether it's intentional product placement or not, I'm not sure, but it feels like the most seamless product placement where the brand is showing up in his universe and it does not mess with the story that he's telling. I think it's great. I like that a lot. I mean, I love that type of brand exposure. Yeah. Like I think, I think even as we explore like a big conversation we're having right now, it's like, what's the next chapter of monetization with Collins? You know, like what is what does this look like? Obviously this Lexus deal is totally different for us. Like, okay, can we direct ads and like have an official category sponsor? But I think the ever presence of a brand is cool and effective. Agreed. I actually think that is a core truth of advertising that I have no issue with. Like F1 cars are obviously a great example of this. There's like an ever presence of the brand. It's embedded into the whole thing. Yeah. And of course, like TBBN is a great example of a podcast that said like the brands are just going to be here. We're going to be proud of the brands and they're just going to be plastered on this set or on the screen. So I think the ever presence of a brand is cool. Now on the high end, we've talked about this video before, but from Michelle Care, when she tries to recreate and successfully recreates the Tom Cruise stunt hanging out of the airplane, Red Bull is literally the engine that facilitates the airplane for her. And Red Bull athletes train her for that experience. That episode, I don't think happens without Red Bull finding that specific plane for her totally and training her for that experience. So that's a high end integration, but it's honest and it works. So I think one of the things that will challenge creator as distribution in the future, if we extrapolate a couple of years out is either the creator has to have such a niche audience and is such a tight knit community with that audience or I'm probably as a buyer evaluating if I can just buy the distribution for cheaper, right? Like I can buy reach right now. I was having a conversation with someone last night whose serial entrepreneur has a ton of products and he was like, yeah, our marketing team like built this agentic. Software to create e-commerce creative, place media buys and optimize on a 24 hour cycle. So the distribution that he is able to get just through media buys and through creative is exponential, right? And it is, it is cheaper than paying us to reach our audience. If you truly were like, I just want to reach a large group of creative people on the internet, you can buy that through just paid media. The reason to work with us is our unique voice, our direct connection to the audience. But I would say as creators go forward, like the absence of a extremely clear POV on your relationship to the audience is going to create a situation where there's a cheaper option to buy distribution, of course. I don't care about someone who gets views for views sake. Yeah, it does. From an audience that they don't even know who these people are. It just doesn't, it's just going to be hard to matter in the future. Now, I show speed in the Expedia ad that matters because I show speed is a face. It matters because of what that guy wrote on LinkedIn and like he stopped because it was us. And so the ability from a creator to stop you in your tracks is like the main thing to explore. It's like, who are you in the market? Could you show up in talent as talent in an ad? And would people stop? Okay. What do Wes Anderson, Spike Lee, Marty Scorsese and Steven Spielberg all have in common? They've all directed commercials. So creators and creatives as directors is not new. Every creator in their own sense is some sort of director, right? Directing their own story, directing their own videos on their channel. And now creators are moving towards becoming directors for brands. Yeah, I think again, as we're sitting in Can Lions, like that whole industry is rooted on the ad agency, the creative director, the people who can actually execute the ad. And one thing I'm noticing is that there's that group of individuals, a lot of them are very sharp. They have good creative ideas, but they're kind of restricted to the silo that is the conference room. Like they exist inside of an office. They spend time with their client. They pitch creative to them. They validate the idea internally. And then they go out and spend a much money to make it. And the thing that's different about the internet creator as a director, or even the Wes Anderson as a director is that they're in the practice of filmmaking and putting things out and seeing how people react to it. That's the key people. Yes, real physical. Real physical. Agencies are accustomed to getting feedback from their clients, from the brand. And it can be a different brand with different feedback every time. Some directors, creators, we get feedback directly from the audience. That's where we take our cues to make something that will resonate. So what we're starting to see is the rise of creator directors where you're not even seeing the creator in the advertising. They're directing the advertising. They're writing the concept. And we as creators have more reps than maybe anyone else. When you put us apples to apples with a director at an ad agency, we know what it feels like to put something out and for the audience to like it or for the audience to hate it. And we know what that feels like basically on a week to week basis, like even with us, the amount of short form that we're posting right now, like we understand what people are reacting to day to day. So the amount of data we have working with creators as directors where you don't even put them on camera. And maybe you do some BTS or it becomes abundantly clear that they directed the thing. But again, back to the comfort level of a brand. To me, this is an extremely underutilized relationship between brands and creators. And I think every brand would be surprised again. How many creators would be down to do this? Totally. And then, basically, the big brands who have some cultural cachet where it would even, it would matter to the creator to have that announcement go out that this creator made an ad for this company. You look at Spike Jones directing an apple ad. Right. It matters to Spike Jones and to Apple that it's known that he made the ad. Totally. Emilio de Muldenberg directed a music video recently or maybe within the past six months. And that was like a very cool thing that went out. It was not as loud as maybe it could be, but it was cool. And I think about like Emilio directing a Blenciaga commercial or something. You'd be like, whoa, that is interesting and cool. And I think the ripple effect of earned media and distribution you can get from hiring a creator as your director. I really think it's like such a massive opportunity in marketing right now that is underutilized. We have a friend who's a fantastic director who basically lived with us at Cannes. It was wonderful. Pablo Rashat. But he directs some of the most interesting campaigns on the internet. And he also posts on Instagram like multiple times a week with interesting fun little quips that like go very viral. So he has such a pulse on what matters to people. Yeah. I believe that he is the blueprint. The gold standard for what it means to be a creator who is also a director. Yes. So he has this one ad for Nike. Every creator should watch this Nike ad. Every creator should watch this. I think it's one of the best ads I've seen. But it basically starts with the zoomed in shot of shoes running. And they're running on something. Looks like a treadmill. That's moving. Start to zoom out. And what's revealed is that he's running on a cement truck. Ednavatt. Now the reason this is interesting. Pablo said is because the goal is to be familiar but unexpected to take reality and put its slight twist on it. And so he was thinking about shoes. Shoes run on treadmills. What's an unexpected treadmill? And that's a very simple framework, but it's an incredibly powerful storytelling rule. No matter if you're making ads or telling a video, this works in comedy. It works in horror. You need to be familiar and then hit someone with something unexpected. I think this premise too is exactly what we've talked about with Curry Parker and making the film obsession. Him as a director. What makes him and Kane Parsons great directors is because they've cut their teeth on the internet. They know what it feels like to make something for this audience. also like I've been thinking so much about obsession that the frame of obsession is guy legs girl, girl doesn't like guy back, guy wishes girl liked him. That is like a tale as old as time. What happens next is the twist. Everything I just said is familiar to everyone in the world. And then twist. So that premise is so internet because that's kind of what you have to do in a title and thumbnail, right? You have to present something very familiar. Or even in a short form feed. Because you're scrolling. Does this look familiar to everyone so that they stop, they get it and then all of a sudden in a very quick amount of time, do you put a twist on it? Yeah. So I think the next crop of like excellent directors, both film and commercial are creators. You just have to look at how to think about them like that and how to just fit them in your system. You definitely have directors for your commercials of your brand. Use a creator next time. And again, if you're the brand, it gives you more control than if they're just talking about or integrating your brand on their channel. Last way that we're seeing brands and creators work together and this is like a significant rise in this, which is creators as consultants or strategists, we do a lot of this work. This is definitely like a primary inbound we get is, hey, can you work with our marketing team on our creator strategy? Hey, can you work with our marketing team on the messaging of this product? And I think this is really sharp. It actually goes really similarly into the last thing we just said of creators as directors, where it's if we know what is happening on the internet, we know what's landing on the internet and you're trying to make something land on the internet, bring someone in the room who's a practitioner. And there's the kind of informal version of this, which I think a lot of creator friends of ours do, which is, hey, can we engage you on like a one off engagement to consultants project? There's a lot more formalization of this, which is creators turning into agencies themselves. Anthpo, who we've had on the show, I think is truly one of the most creative individuals has an agency called Pufferfish. And if you don't know him, I'm sure you're familiar with his work. He is the guy behind the Timothy Shalme look a light contest and many other internet stunts. I'll call them. He is just a master of grabbing attention, whether it's through video or just on the street. So he has now like quite a few clients, a team in New York that is working across multiple clients, social strategies, marketing, commercials, like all the above. And this to me, I think is going to increase for a few reasons, one of which that I think is that a lot of creators who enjoy making stuff for the internet don't want to be media companies. They don't want to sell ads into their content. They don't want to be distribution. They'd rather sell their expertise. Yes. They want to be creative and make cool stuff for the internet and are down to work with brands, but they don't want it to be in their environment as a representation of them. And I think that's a really interesting distinction where it's again, back to the director bit, but even a step further, a step more removed is when you have an agency and you're like, my agency is doing the work. It's not me. It's like this firm that I've created that has like a certain level of taste. But I think that's a really interesting thing. And I think a lot of creators don't also think of this as an option where it's I want to make videos for a living. I want to do creative work with brands for a living. But a lot of people are reduced to the singular version of this deal, which is I'll make you in Instagram real or I'll make you a 60 second host red ad on my platform when actually there's all these other options now that I've emerged. So can you recap for me? What are the four ways that brands are working with creators? Number one, as distribution, working with a creator to get to their audience. Number two, as talent. Let me pull this creator into one of our ads the same way I'd pull a celebrity in. Number three is as directors. You have a POV on the world. You know how to direct a campaign that works for the internet. Come direct my advertising. Number four is as consultants. Be a voice in the room while I'm trying to sort out how I'm going to message my company or my product to the world on the internet. Is there one that you think is going to grow faster than the other? Because creators as distribution is the status quo. That's what we're used status quo. Yeah. I think creators as consultants is going to grow a lot because I think there's a lot of money available there. And when you think about as creators, there's a couple of ways to grow. One is get bigger, charge more for brand deals, do more brand deals, launch your own product. There's a lot of these ways to make money. And I would say that the one that is probably most creators are getting approached with the most is consulting. I just want your mind. You know, I want your mind. I want your expertise on this real quick. It's a very low stakes version for both parties to engage with each other and get some expertise. But I think modern marketing teams are definitely, again, back to the top of the show trying to solve creator. And even to try and understand what that problem is that they're trying to solve, it's how are we more relevant on the internet in a world that has an abundance of content? How do we stick out? How are we relevant? And again, one version is to like get into the distribution flows that people are watching. The other version is pull that person in and have them help you. Yep. All right. I'm going to show you guys some ads. Let me know if you like them or not. All right. The first one is from almost Friday TV. They are a sketch comedy group. They work with some repeat partners like cash app and things like that, but all of their ads are very bespoke. Okay. You'll know what I mean. Have you been tackled at work while we're in medieval armor? And maybe somebody spilt their whiskey sour on you, causing allergic reaction for the millionth day in a row. Hey, dude. At Morgan and Morgan, we're four the people. And whether you're stuck in a time loop or you're stuck with medical bills, we're here to help you. Soren Mishaps. I challenge your claim to this off it. The Crossbow Mishfires. You are a really nice lady. Emotional damage from playing Fortnite. If it hurts, we're here to help. Call Morgan and Morgan, America's largest injury law firm because you may not escape the time loop, but you can't escape paying out of pocket. Wow. Okay. First of all, Morgan and Morgan, which is a law firm, one of the biggest advertisers on the internet, which is crazy. I see more Morgan and Morgan ads than like anything right now, but they do a great job being in comedy. To me, that is almost Friday, guys, as directors. Yeah. That feels like them as directors. Yeah. That is within a larger video, but you could just cut that out and run that as pre-roll across YouTube. Yeah, which I would probably suggest if I was the brand, just do that, like just get rights to paid media there because that's like a funny ad. And I think people who are funny like that have such a great opportunity to be directors. It's amazing that that's their version of an integration, which is basically right and direct a scripted comedy sketch on behalf of Morgan and Morgan. Yeah. That by the way, the sketch has nothing to do with the video. Yeah. It's like not at all. Like it's a sketch video and then a sketch ad. But they went so hard like for the love of the game to just make something interesting. Yeah. But they also, because they also have to respect their audience in terms of like their audience is only going to react if it's a sketch and it's funny. It's funny. But that also is at the end of their video. So again, if I'm Morgan and Morgan, like from a distribution perspective, I probably can guess how many people are watching at the end of the video or get the data on how many people watching in the end of the video. But if I'm the advertiser, I want rights to that to run this paid media because that's a cool asset that now- And then it can show up as a pre-roll or a mid-roll. Yeah, and like also directed by almost Friday. It's a cool story. Make the story about it. Yeah. And it's respectable from an audience perspective that a brand is down to be silly. Yeah. And then you step into their universe. Yeah. A brand you wouldn't expect to be silly to. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Just seeing an ad for a personal injury law firm is funny in itself and partnering up with those guys is like perfect. Yeah. The other ad that I wanted to bring up kind of fits into consultants and creatives is a title sponsor that they work closely and for Ludwig, it is AT&T and Red Bull. And a lot of his integrations, they'll do like little ad reads here and there, but stream overlays on events and just even his desktop streams. And what is really respectable from this is an audience perspective are brands. Wow. That's insane, by the way. Show me that's YouTube right now. And a mid-roll ad just started playing, which is Marques Brownlee talking about Ridge. But like look at how good this is. Already. You want to watch it because that's Marques showing me a product. Showing me a product, yeah. But it's a mid-roll ad. So like what we're telling you guys is already happening that YouTube is going to have YouTubers in all these ads. Making the ads. Making the ads in the ads. Like this is in a way that feels native. This just looks like an MKBHD video. And if you are a fan of MKBHD to take a step further, you know that Ridge is a part of this universe. Yeah. That's cool. Wow. What a funny thing. All right. Now let's get to the Ludwig one. Back to what I said about brands becoming part of the creators universe. I think being a title sponsor does that really well because now it's all these cool things that Ludwig does. He plays up being I'm a Red Bull athlete. It's a running bit he has on his channel. and all of the things gaming tournaments, streamer games all become these recurring things brought to you by AT&T and Red Bull. So much so at Streamer University, Ludwig actually used the Streamer Games as like a perk where he announced one of the teams was fully from members or attendees of Streamer University. So he kind of carries the Red Bull and AT&T brand with him across all of his platforms, even when he's appearing in other things, he's like their guy. I just like this because right now we're looking at a frame where he is talking to the audience, he's talking to us, but he's wearing a Red Bull hat and there is a little bug graphic in the bottom corner for AT&T. And I'm so used to this style of advertising, it doesn't feel disruptive to me. Yeah, again, it's the ever presence of an advertiser. And at any moment, yeah, at any moment as you're watching this, you're going to see AT&T or Red Bull. Yeah. So they get more out of it. This is like, this is not novel, it's what athletes do. Like an athlete. And what sports does. Yeah, what sports does. And what athletes do of like their wear Nike hats or Nike shoes. But I think this is like we don't see that much of this and we should see more of it. Like we really should. I'd be really curious. I mean, I know TBPN did this with ramp, but what our audience would think if in the bottom corner of our show, there was a bug, a little graphic for Lexus or Shopify. Yeah, yeah. I think it's better advertising. I think so too. Yeah, I think the ever presence of it is better. Yeah, and ever presence so many times on this episode, but I think. Isn't that a band ever presence? No, that's Evan Essings. Cool. Cool. All right, let's look at one more. The last one I had was the, I show speed going places. Yeah, so explain this campaign. This ran as pre-roll, right? Because this didn't really show up in his content at all. No, these were pre-roll ads and then Expedia just posted them in this one, 13 million views. I'm assuming. Yeah, that's pre-rolled. That's paid media. Yeah, but these are good ads from memory. I would have I was Expedia. I would open the ad with I show speed. It opens the ad with the Expedia logo. I think if you only have a few seconds, I would have opened with I show speed. But yeah, they're basically like. The way I read this is like they're the official travel partner of I show speed and he's traveling in these. I agree with you. It makes a lot of sense because if you watch speed, he's like the travel guy right now. Yeah. I do think it could feel more like a speed video. Yeah, like a YouTube video. Yeah. Like if it's opening with speed or even one of his IRL experiences, I think it's a way better connection off the bat than here's speed in our thing, not like we're partnering with speed. Yeah, I would expect to see a camera following him through a crowd or through an experience. Like that's what I'm used to with him. I think if we're going to get contextually native talent to YouTube, I think we need contextually native creative. Yeah. And that's actually, it's not easy to get to even with our Lexus stuff. Like I think it was hard to figure out what the hooks should be and what everything should look and feel like. But like one thing if you come across our ads on YouTube, you'll see is that every ad that we make, the first shot is us addressing the audience, right? Which is pretty uncommon in advertising that you like are staring in the camera in the eye and addressing the audience. And that's what we felt was important to the context of YouTube. All right. We talked a lot about advertising on this show. I'm curious if you guys think about advertising as much as we do. I mean, if you're a creator, you must because it is truly the economic engine of the creator economy. But if there's a great ad you've seen, put it in the comments. I want to hear about it. You can't not think about advertising. It's everywhere. Yeah. That's true. Even like watching WorldCop, it was like, whoa, that's a lot of advertising. Like the power-aid hydration break. Yeah. And you can, next WorldCop, there's going to be so many new ad products that come out of that. Question for you. Do you think it's effective marketing when an event like a FIFA brings a creator to the event and they are obligated to post that they're at the event? In a case where you can like create content at the event, like speed streaming, even if it's not the game just him there, I can get behind it, especially when whenever brands can like show that they're one of the cool ones and kind of let you do that than it does. If it's just like, hey, I'm here at that thing, doesn't really matter. I was going to say, I think there's a cool factor to it for me of like getting the invite. You know, like I'm super aware that like Adam W and Darman went to FIFA with Marriott Bonvoy and Haley Bailey went with American Airlines. Like Kelly Wakasa. Yeah, I went with YouTube. Ashley was there. Like I can tell you. Yes, her was there. I don't know if I am so aware of this because I am in the business versus if somebody's like a consumer, how they react to it. I think for a younger audience, it's definitely like an aspirational moment in culture to be at. I think from a consumer perspective, like as a peer, I think they could do more to your point of like I show speed being more involved. It feels kind of like a billboard to me, which is fine. It's effective, but I just as I'm scrolling through my feet, I'm like, oh, there's another person I know who is there. There was a there's a streamer Will Neff who recently did a collaboration sponsored stream with Applebees. And during the stream, they watched a live stream of the Savannah bananas game. And it was so good. Like even though the brands were like separated, allowing someone to like live stream, a paid event and things like that and have fun with it and be silly is so, so good. Yeah. All right. Let us know what ads have stuck out to you guys in the past few weeks. I'm really curious to know again, I feel like I watch ads as a analyst and as a like person in the business of advertising, but I'm just curious about what's sticking out to you guys. As we continue to go deeper into the world of advertising as creators, what's sticking out to you? And if you're watching YouTube without premium and you see one of our Lexus ads, take a photo, let us know. Watch it. Leave a comment. Don't skip it. Watch it. Watch it. All right. See you guys next week. (upbeat music)

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. The future of the creator economy depends on better collaboration between brands and creators, with creator spend projected to reach $39 billion by 202
  2. There are four main ways brands work with creators
  3. Colin and Samir partnered with Lexus to create pre-roll ads for YouTube, marking a shift where creators make standalone ads rather than integrated content, freeing them from audience constraints.
  4. The "messy middle" occurs when brand integrations lack authenticity, such as awkward podcast ad reads or mismatched partnerships like Rick Rubin for Polymarket.
  5. Successful examples include Jake Shane and Alo (fitness transformation narrative) and David Dobrik’s comedic ad reads, which embrace honesty and creativity.

Summary:

The transcription discusses the evolving landscape of advertising in the creator economy, focusing on how brands and creators can collaborate more effectively. Colin and Samir highlight that creator spend is expected to hit $39 billion by 2026, underscoring the importance of these partnerships. They identify four primary ways brands engage with creators: as talent (featuring creators in traditional ads, like Lexus using Colin and Samir in pre-rolls), as distribution (creators promoting brands to their audiences, often leading to a "messy middle" when authenticity is lost), through integrated content (brands enhancing creator videos without disrupting the narrative), and through world-building (brands creating narratives around creators, such as Jake Shane’s fitness journey with Alo).

, YouTubers in YouTube ads). They also note that brands often struggle with giving up control, leading to discomfort, but when done right—like Huckberry’s subtle integration with Goth Babe—these collaborations can feel natural and effective. The episode emphasizes that the creator economy’s growth hinges on brands and creators working together without losing authenticity or audience trust.

FAQs

The episode focuses on four ways creators and brands can work together, discussing the future of advertising in the creator economy.

Advertising is the economic engine of the internet, enabling it to be free, and most creators earn the majority of their income from brand partnerships.

The 'messy middle' refers to ads that try to sneak in brand deliverables or lack honesty, failing to fully integrate or clearly separate from the content.

They made four pre-roll ads for YouTube, purely as ads separate from their content, with Lexus sponsoring videos and creating multiple assets like cinematic and iPhone-shot clips.

In 'creator as talent,' brands bring creators into their own ad system for control, while 'creator as distribution' involves creators sharing brand messages to their audience, often requiring audience consideration.

Brands worry about losing control over their message when creators produce content independently, as it may not align with brand guidelines, leading to discomfort.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.