#2 - Recruitment and Retention with Matt Lewis and Sam Hall
from Socitm Says
8m 40s
The local public sector struggles to recruit and retain technology professionals amid competitive private sector pay, flexible working, and limited career progression. While remote and hybrid work is increasingly available, structural issues such as lack of line management, complex organisational environments, and low salaries deter skilled applicants. Bureaucratic recruitment processes—like 30-page application forms—add significant friction compared to private sector efficiency. There is a notable skills gap in technology areas like cloud, open standards, and digital design, with public sector pay often failing to match market rates for experienced roles. Career development is limited, as most local authorities lack clear, structured progression pathways. However, some organisations are responding by offering short-term contracts, targeted training, and flexible working to attract talent. These approaches acknowledge that public sector roles may not offer long-term financial incentives, but they can still provide value through local community impact and professional growth. Collaborative efforts, such as shared marketing of digital services or learning from initiatives like the charity Teach, could strengthen public sector appeal. The findings highlight the need for systemic change—better pay structures, streamlined hiring, and clearer career paths—to address the ongoing talent shortage in local public technology functions.
Hello, I'm S.A. Malfason. I've written a report for Sockotim on recruitment and retention
issues for local public sector technology functions, and members can get access to this
through the resource hub on the Sockotim website.
This podcast is intended to pass on a few of the main things I've found, as well as
comments from a couple of people I spoke to for the report.
Rooting and retaining technology staff is difficult for the local public sector.
The private sector can often pay more, and with the pandemic making remote working,
much more common, local authorities can find themselves losing technologists to employers
elsewhere in the country or even the world.
But while it may not be possible to compete on pay, the public sector can take advantage
of many people's enthusiasm to work flexibly.
This isn't something that everyone wants, but research by the Office for National Statistics
shows that just over half of all 35 to 44-year-old workers do so from home at least over time,
along with as many as 4/5 of those earning more than £50,000 a year.
Another research suggests that employees are keener than some employers, when it comes
to flexible working, and this gives public sector employers the chance to develop an edge
over the private sector.
There's evidence that some are doing this.
When I searched the Gunf UK Civil Service Jobs website in February, I found that 84% of
the 720 jobs found by a search on digital were tagged flexible working, up from 77% in October,
and meanwhile 60% were tagged job share.
The Department for Work Compensions lets successful candidates work in hybrid fashion, some
days at home and some days at one of its seven digital hubs across England.
While we aren't talking about civil servants becoming digital nomads, this does provide
DWP staff with a degree of flexibility, and means many will be able to take up jobs without
having to move home.
We've got a porto's lot to Matt Lewis, a socks-invite president and chief operating officer
of SRS Wales, the collaborative ICT service for four councils and a police force in Southeast
Wales.
Matt spoke about the difficulties of recruiting and retaining technologists at last year's
president's conference in Cardiff, including how some people had left for jobs in Bristol,
overseas, or gained a London waiting despite working from home.
He says that one issue is that local government isn't set up to pay higher salaries to non-managing
specialists.
You tend to have to have line management to be able to get above the 40-50K bracket, and
for a lot of IT people, and probably for a lot of highly skilled people in other disciplines,
line management isn't something they aspire to have, so architects, they just want to be
technical, they want to be the gold to person for everything about technical, for networks
or whatever.
You'll have the same for planners, probably the same for finance.
People who are amazing at what they know and what they do, you just can't get them about
the scales without giving them line management, so that's one reason that people use on the
phone.
The other one is money, you know, at the moment with a cost of living issues, no one
can turn down 15-20K with a young family, and the third one typically tends to be because
we are quite complex, we look after five organisations, no matter how good the work that we do,
they will always be five organisations that we support, and some people prefer just to
look after one organisation.
So a few of our staff, you know, as well as those other reasons, they've also said,
I can go somewhere for more money, less working hours in a week, because then the new work
in hour seems to be 35 and not 37, so I can drop hours, get more money, and I've only
got the complexity of having to do something once, whereas for us you may have to do something
five times because there are five separate organisations, so that complexity just seems
to be frustrated some people as well, especially when you've gone off to just do something
within one boundary for a lot more money.
These issues aren't easy to solve, but Matt says there are other ways in which the local
public sector undermines itself on recruitment.
The reason that some people want to apply for roles with us is because of the application
process, as a good example, the application process is so time consuming, the blank document
is 30 pages long, and when you fill that document out, it can be anywhere up to 20, 25 pages
long, so people just don't want to spend the time filling that in when they can apply
for any other job on Indeed or LinkedIn, just by clicking on Apply here, and all their
details are taken and submitted automatically, so you'll see where they hold online, so
it's a very different HR process than most other organisations.
Some Hall has worked in a number of senior jobs in public sector technology, including
most recently Chief Digital Officer for Welsh Local Government, before moving last November
to Digital Health and Care Wales, where she is Director of Primary, Community Care and
Mental Health Digital Services.
She says that recruitment can be harder, depending on what organisations are looking for.
So there's a particular issue in technology around certain skills and technology.
I'm hearing lots of feedback on things like open standards, open architecture, general
architecture, cloud, they seem to be big struggles.
In digital, it's everything from content to design to business analysts, there are people
out there that you can recruit, but they're either very junior or they are priced out of
the local government market, so there are people there but the prices, we're not paying
enough basically, so we want ten years experience.
But we're paying, we're paying graduate pay.
On the question of retention, something's money is an important reason for people to
move jobs, but not the only one.
You know, we do exit interviews with people, and we chat to people that have left quite
often, it will be money's the reason that they've gone.
But there's also something around that career and opportunity, so I came from central government,
we had very clear career pathways, people could come in as a junior associate and they could
progress up to lead or principal and there was very clear pathway and a clear, you know,
pay scale increase associated with it, that isn't the case in local government.
Local authorities could try to establish better career structures, although that can be
difficult given they are much smaller than the civil service.
I've seen some taking a different approach.
So some of the authorities, and one in particular is looking at it very differently, and they're
saying, we know, we're not paying enough, we know we can't keep you for life, come on
work with us for 18 months or two years and just give us something, and we'll give you
some training and we'll give you some support and then you'll probably go off to something
much more exciting and financially lucrative for you and we know that, but we'd rather
have you for a year or two than not at all.
As well as offering remote and hybrid working, Matt Asam mentioned some of the possible ways
in which local public services could do better on recruitment and retention, including
easier recruitment processes and looking to bring people in for just a few years.
And local public services have strong stories to tell, both in general about service,
local communities and specifically about their technology functions.
The charity now teach, which works to attract people into teaching from other careers,
could provide inspiration here, and there's potential for the sector to collaborate more,
such as through shared marketing of local digital services as a career.
As mentioned earlier, my full report is available to members on the Soxham website.
I hope you found this podcast of interest and thanks for listening.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
The local public sector faces significant challenges in recruiting and retaining technology staff due to lower salaries and complex organisational structures.
Flexible working is a key advantage public sector organisations can leverage, with growing evidence of its adoption through hybrid and remote options.
Many technologists prefer technical roles without line management, making career progression difficult without structural changes.
High cost of living and limited salary increases push skilled professionals toward private sector roles offering better pay and work-life balance.
Recruitment is hampered by lengthy, bureaucratic application processes that contrast sharply with the efficiency of private sector digital job portals.
Skill shortages persist in areas like cloud, open standards, and digital design, exacerbated by public sector pay that fails to reflect market rates.
Clear career pathways, common in central government, are missing in local public sector technology roles, reducing long-term employee commitment.
Some local authorities are experimenting with short-term contracts and targeted training to attract talent, even if it means staff eventually move to better-paying roles.
Summary:
The local public sector struggles to recruit and retain technology professionals amid competitive private sector pay, flexible working, and limited career progression. While remote and hybrid work is increasingly available, structural issues such as lack of line management, complex organisational environments, and low salaries deter skilled applicants. Bureaucratic recruitment processes—like 30-page application forms—add significant friction compared to private sector efficiency.
There is a notable skills gap in technology areas like cloud, open standards, and digital design, with public sector pay often failing to match market rates for experienced roles. Career development is limited, as most local authorities lack clear, structured progression pathways. However, some organisations are responding by offering short-term contracts, targeted training, and flexible working to attract talent.
These approaches acknowledge that public sector roles may not offer long-term financial incentives, but they can still provide value through local community impact and professional growth. Collaborative efforts, such as shared marketing of digital services or learning from initiatives like the charity Teach, could strengthen public sector appeal. The findings highlight the need for systemic change—better pay structures, streamlined hiring, and clearer career paths—to address the ongoing talent shortage in local public technology functions.
FAQs
The public sector often cannot compete with private sector pay, especially given rising living costs. Additionally, complex organisational structures, lack of clear career pathways, and lengthy application processes deter skilled technologists.
Many tech workers value flexibility, with over half of 35-44 year-olds working from home at least part-time. Offering hybrid or remote options allows public sector organisations to appeal to this preference without matching private sector salaries.
The application process is often time-consuming, with lengthy forms that can take up to 25 pages. This contrasts sharply with private sector processes that allow quick online applications, making public sector roles less attractive.
Technologists are often attracted to roles offering lower working hours, higher pay, and simpler job structures. The public sector’s complexity of supporting multiple organisations can feel overwhelming compared to single-organisation roles.
Skills in open standards, open architecture, cloud computing, and areas like content, design, and business analysis are difficult to recruit due to a lack of experienced candidates and insufficient pay for mid-to-senior roles.
Clear, structured career progression with defined pay increases is rare in local government. In contrast, central government offers well-defined pathways, which makes public sector roles less appealing for long-term retention.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.