Go back

$1B monthly volume on lightning with Sam Wouters | SLP725

53m 54s

$1B monthly volume on lightning with Sam Wouters | SLP725

The discussion centers on River's annual Lightning Network adoption report, which analyzes transaction data to assess network usage and growth. For November 2025, the report estimates over $1.7 billion in transaction volume, marking a fourfold increase from the previous year. This growth occurs despite relatively stable public capacity metrics, indicating improved efficiency among node operators in routing payments and managing liquidity. A key insight is that much of the volume stems from exchange-related activities, such as withdrawals and transfers, as many users still rely on custodial services rather than self-custody. The conversation also reflects on early adoption narratives, noting that initial expectations overemphasized universal self-custody and maximizing on-chain capacity, whereas real-world use shows a more gradual, pragmatic adoption curve. Finally, it is argued that Bitcoin's main challenge today is not scalability—given low on-chain fees and effective layer-2 solutions—but rather public perception and broader acceptance.

Transcription

11133 Words, 59821 Characters

English
by no means same skill ability solved. It's more like it's not as big of a challenge as we initially thought it would be because we don't need 8 billion people on there. Like should we just give up on everything that doesn't scale immediately to the entire planet? It's like no, that doesn't really exist. Hi everyone and welcome back to Stefan Levere podcast. Today I'm joined by Sam Wouters from River. Many of you will know River as a Bitcoin only brokerage, financial services, various products that they're offering, known for doing lightning stuff as well. I know you guys are just going to be putting out this report soon on Bitcoin adoption and interestingly for me, especially as the lightning adoption stuff. Welcome to the show Sam and just give us a bit of an overview and what you saw in this report. Thanks for having me on Stefan. With the report, like this is something we've been doing for the last couple of years and one of the goals has been to make something that is very hard to understand and kind of map out more understandable for people. So everyone is familiar typically or I'm saying everyone but a lot of people probably aren't familiar with sort of like how much capacity is in the lightning network, how many channels there are, and sort of like how long it's been around which has been almost 10 years now since it was first conceived and what people struggle with is really understanding how much is it actually being used? Are people using lightning on a day-to-day basis? What are they using it for? How often? How big are those transactions? Beyond individuals running their own lightning node, there just isn't that much clarity on the developments there and that makes it really hard for people to understand like is sort of like is Bitcoin scaling? Like does this technology work? Who is adopting it? Like what is it being used for? And it makes things like capital allocation in the space really difficult because investors just don't know like if I'm investing in a lightning company, is there actual demand in the market there other than like the public metrics that I can tell that typically don't move drastically over time? So it's quite difficult for them to make informed decisions without more information and then for people choosing to dedicate their career to improving lightning as well, it's like who am I doing it for? I can't really see who's using it or like how active that is other than the own my own node that I'm running and the activity that's happening there. So the data just like helps to inform a whole variety of different stakeholders also even like exchanges, should we adopt lightning? Should we offer that to our clients or not? If they don't know how many people really need it and their clients aren't at large scale reaching out to them asking them to add it, then they don't really know. So there are lots of different categories there that you know, get better informed through better data and then we kind of made the decision a couple of years back like at River, we have our own lightning data obviously there's other people in the space that also have lightning data. What if we just do an exercise once a year where we try to collect as much as possible and then get a bit of an indication that way of like how much traffic could roughly be happening on the network? So all of this is obviously you know it's by no means perfect and a big reason for that as well is because we're only using public data and the lightning network can also be used privately in the sense of private channels where the participants just aren't publicly known and we don't have any data on that either. So this is in that regard it's like a lower bound estimate as well and the reality could still be significantly higher. Right. So yeah let's talk about the high level numbers because I think that will be interesting for people. So give us the headline stats on lightning network nowadays. Yeah so what we found was we did this exercise for November 2025. It takes like a while to gather all the data and process everything and in that month we found like we basically collected data on about 50% of all the capacity on the network. So that's quite a lot with that said the year before we did about 80% and the year before that was also around 50% so it's kind of fluctuated based on like who's willing to participate? How much are we able to gather? Where is all the capacity located and whatnot? But we used that roughly 50% to then determine like you've got to want to avoid how much overlap is there between these nodes and to then arrive at like roughly how much volume has flown through and how many transactions have flown through that 50% of the capacity and then extrapolate that to the rest of the network to get like a rough estimate of sort of like directionally order of magnitude how much is going on. So what we found there was that in November 2025 we went over a billion dollars in transaction volume all-liking. I think the final number was a 1.7 billion that we found compared to the year before 2024. We found 280 say that's that's indeed in the month of November and then a year earlier in November 2024 it was about 286 million dollars so that's a really significant increase of like it's a 4x increase basically which was very like pretty shocking to find that's a very rapid increase and people are especially surprised I think because the Bitcoin price has been relatively like sideways and are down in recent months but back in November it was like an average for the year so the questions start flowing and from people like hey is this a strange outlier of some kind like did you guys check more data throughout the year like let someone cook the books or whatever and we had part we have our own data obviously a river but we also had partial data from some other data providers for December and then just confirmed the trend of anything it was stronger sort of like directionally based on that data that that wasn't enough to say like okay we're going to put an estimate for December into as the assumptions is getting weaker when you have less capacity supporting it. Interesting. So it's kind of the thinking. Now I guess some interesting context as you said what we're talking about here is the public lightning network now people look at explorers whether that's anbos or mempore.space lightning and I can see here it's 5348 BTC is the quote unquote TVL of lightning but your number that you gave which is 1.17 billion is something like 70,000 BTC per month so in other words it means it's cycling over more than x every month right so there's kind of a funny like the stock value of you know at least public Bitcoin in lightning channels is you know 5,000 but we've got 17,000 BTC kind of just assuming current prices it's kind of crazy that it's we're getting like three x turn over every month. Yep yeah it's fantastic to see an analogy I like to use here because like one of the first pieces of criticism you get from people is like no it's not scaling or this can be possible because the public metrics don't reflect this kind of growth and we'd already started calling it out a couple of years ago is like we're seeing an increase in how efficient people are with the capacity that's on the network and we realized that this ourselves as well like you don't need to have hundreds of Bitcoin sitting in nodes on the network to be able to like route a lot of payments like as long as your setup is efficient you've got like good loops to be able to refill your capacity and whatnot then like there isn't really a strong need there to just keep like adding on more and more capacity that's ultimately just sitting in essentially all 12 lots which puts it at more risk than if it were in gold storage and if you think about it like a lot of this growth here makes a lot of sense because there have been a lot of improvements that have made it more sort of like made it easier for node operators to manage their liquidity everyone's just gotten better and the analogy I like to use is like think of it as like a game of tennis where instead of telling the players like you should be scoring as many points as possible so the balls constantly go off the courts and you need to like pick up a new ball like new liquidity basically and you keep trying to score as many points as possible a lot of people kind of look at lightning like that they don't really understand like wait like shouldn't we be maximizing the amount of Bitcoin that's in the lightning network and like having more channels and having more nodes and it's all about every number going up all the time whereas I think what's happened a lot is basically we've told the players in the game the longer you keep playing with the same ball the more you can bounce it back and forth without dropping it the more money you make so try not to hit any balls off the field like maximize the sort of like the balls that you have available to you typically these players will have a couple in their pockets on the field and just keep going back and forth as many times again the more times again the faster you play the more money you make but just don't hit it off the court and that's what we've seen like lightning node operators get better and better at over the past years yeah and this aligns with other lightning experts that I talked to that generally speaking when I talk to them as in practitioners who are actually running a node and actually doing this professionally or semi professionally they are noticing this kind of secular increase in lightning volumes just over time right now okay of course when there's like a big bull run in the Bitcoin price okay maybe you get a spike maybe there's a quite a quite wealth effect right historically that has been kind of a factor but I'm curious did you see a similar pattern there and then do you have any insights or any any analysis on the number of users of lightning on the number of users we don't it's not an area that we were looking into now I recall trying to create estimates in like one of the reports a couple years ago and it's incredibly difficult you can like look at sort of like rough downloads of all that's and things like that but there's obviously a lot of churn there where people don't keep using it you can make estimations based on an exchange might have lightning available and then trying to estimate okay they have this many active users only a few of them publicly report that how many of those might be using lightning it's all like to sort of like the the the estimations are a bit too weak there make a proper estimation, especially at this point, with how many large platforms have it available, that is really difficult to determine, like roughly what is that? What we do know, and that gives a bit of a, like honestly, it gives the best kind of estimation of how many users might there be, is how many transactions were sent in a particular month by the estimation, like where we go back to November 2025 there, mentioned earlier over a billion dollar in transaction volume, and the lightning transaction count was 5122 million by our estimation. So basically 2.6 million, that we could directly confirm and then sort of extrapolating that into the network, will be publicly around 512 million. So it tells you roughly, like, you know, like how many users could that be, it's not going to be 100 million users, it's probably also not going to be 10 million users. They could be that there are more users than half of them weren't active in that month, that's obviously possible, and then you get into the discussion of like when is someone a user, is it if they transact once a month, is it like once a quarter, is it every week? Yeah. That gets really tricky to discuss as well, but like the- Any insight on the average size of the transaction? I believe that's been rising over time also. Yeah, it's been rising, and I think the logical conclusion there is, and kind of like a lot of people have gotten back to me as this kind of gotcha of like, oh yeah, the primary reason people are doing these lightning transactions now is like withdrawing from an exchange, for example, or maybe sending from one exchange to the other, probably for like arbitrage reasons or something like that. But like the reason that's logically happening is the vast majority of people today to read their exchanges there while at most big corners, unfortunately, by volume, most big coins held itself custody, but by count of individuals and where they're storing their big coin, a lot of people prefer to use exchanges because they're scared of self-custody for whatever reasons, and it's a much lower progress to get them into self-custody. So naturally, if so much of the big coin, and so many of the individuals treat the exchanges there central place from which they hold their money in my due transactions, then that is logically where a lot of the lightning volume also emerges from. Like, I don't know how people pictured this would be any kind of like any different, for all of the money that you pull from an exchange and put into a self-custodial lightning moment, as well, you then need to transact quite a lot before you start matching that volume that you withdrew from the exchange there. So especially in the sort of like earlier developmental stages of lightning, it's very logical that a lot of the volume lives around exchanges and people come back to me with this like, "Oh, but if you extract that volume that what's left?" and it's like, well, that's like saying, we should only be counting cash transactions or something because anything you withdraw from an ATM withdrawal or something like that. That's not allowed. And it's like, you know, I understand the arguments for that, but it gets so opinionated as well about what is valid volume and what isn't. And our goal with this research also with the 5 million transaction account, it isn't to say like, this was a real transaction, but we think that well wasn't, because it's all just like, it's like data strings, there's no like, clarity around, what was the intent of a person to go send a distraction or this tool, you know, they did a thousand transactions there in an hour. That's there's no way a human did that. So always the exact use case here. Let's categorize that differently. Like, there's no way of doing that as well. Yeah. If you were to look back to, let's say, popular narratives when lightning was early, what would you say we as Bitcoin and lightning, you know, enthusiasts, you know, adopters, what were we getting wrong? What narratives were we get what were we wrong about and what were we right about? That's a really good question. I think, I think one big thing I was kind of touching on in there is like, Bitcoiners have been like, we're always very hopeful that everyone will become like a true Bitcoiner. You will hold Bitcoin in self-custody and cold storage and kind of go all the way into that trajectory of like, you get into Austrian economics and you just like start questioning everything in your life. And while that's like the ideal North Star for a lot of big corners, not necessarily everyone gets there. So when lightning was launched early on, I think a lot of people had this idea of like, everyone's going to do itself because so really and that's where we start out and it's only successful if everyone or like a vast majority of people do that. And I think like, you know, I definitely am an idealist. I see that North Star too. At the same time, I think that like, that's not how most people adopt technology necessarily and a lot of people are very hesitant when it comes to money. So for us, it's much more about like, who is on the trajectory of going towards that end goal of like, adopting Bitcoin in more self-sovereign ways. And even if they're initially using it custodially, at least they're like much closer to using it non-custodially than if they weren't using it at all, if they weren't using some kind of stable coin or some other way to do payments. So that's the thing where I felt like like in the early years, a lot of big coins were very focused on that. It's like it can only be as excessive for all doing it that way. But I think like practices kind of show like a lot of people are happy to use it and benefit from it. And the more they use it, the more likely they'll be open to using it in sort of like, more self-sovereign ways as well. I think a second thing that's that's kind of stood out to me with with lightning compared to the early years is I think a lot of people were like overly focused on capacity as well. Like, oh, we've got to get a lot of Bitcoin in here. Lots of channels kind of already touched on that too. And then we learn much later on like, wait, we don't necessarily need as much money in there as possible. You know, like let's like use what we need essentially. And a lot of like other projects coming for all kinds of reasons into the comments to say like, oh, look, this is like only so much total value locked compared to these other platforms. Like, well, they're completely different. Like on one, you're staking and doing all kinds of DeFi things. And then you're trying to facilitate payments. So completely different use case doesn't really make sense to compare. And I'm trying to think I had a third in mind that's been quite prominent, but it's slipping my line at the moment. Yeah, I'll come back. Maybe another one would be this kind of everyone's going to run a note in the box at home sort of thing. Like, that was a common, you know, many of us believe that. I think you were kind of touching on that also. Like I remember at the lightning conference in Berlin in October 2019. Like I was, you know, connecting over to my note back home in Sydney at that time and making a lightning payment. And that was like, it felt so new and cool. But I would say nowadays it's more just like people are just using like a phone app or a custodial platform. For sure. And that's kind of my memory. Remember the third one. Yeah, I remember the third one. I actually, which is I think when lightning launched, I remember very vividly. Everyone was so fearful and so concerned about Bitcoin scalability and might take on that. It's been like a lot of our concerns are very premature. If the system doesn't scale to 8 billion people, then it has failed has been like a predominant narrative in this space for many years. Like it's decreased a bit over time because people have started realizing, wait, on chain fees are actually really low. So it's not as much of a concern. I actually don't think scalability is Bitcoin's biggest sort of like challenge or issue today. I would love it if it was. That would be, you know, a big luxury problem in a way to have on the other hand, it would be a lot of pain and struggle with people trying to send transactions. But practically today, you know, the on chain fees don't lie there low. scalability isn't as much of a concern as people have made it out to be. And part of the reason there is like, you know, it's like gone in different directions. Like a lot of people, there was even the question the other day of like, wait, you might have actually posted it like the lightning scale. Yeah, exactly. Like did it scale too well and did it draw too many transactions from the chain? You know, the way exchanges are using also things like liquid and whatnot and all kinds of other ways to exchange value between them, taking that value off the main chain. Like it's not as much of a problem as if you'd like it to be honestly, in my view, today's biggest challenge for Bitcoin is actually its public image. A lot of people still buy it in with crypto and think it's like, you know, they've put it. I tweeted this yesterday, I think it's like people are putting, like years ago, people put Bitcoin into a box and it's the wrong box, like sort of like in a box in their head, but it's the wrong box. They think it's the same thing as other cryptocurrencies. They think it's a scam. They think it can be trusted for whatever easily they think it's just like a speculative hype and they're sticking with that belief and changing that belief is incredibly difficult. And that is Bitcoin's like sort of like biggest hurdle to further growth. And then if we manage to get more people going there again and excited about Bitcoin, then inevitably we will bump into a scalability. I do believe that by no means same scalability solved. Like when you think about it, like airports can't transfer 8 billion people at any instance either like airplanes and airports and all that infrastructure that's there. It doesn't mean that they're not useful or that, you know, it's not incredibly helpful technology to the entire planet. It's like no, that doesn't really make sense. Chaos also don't scale globally. Like they can't, they can't, they can't, grays everywhere. They can't be taken all over the planets today. There's just a lot of places where they wouldn't thrive. So they can't produce meat for everyone around the planet, not even everyone wants to eat meat. Does that mean that, you know, very silly example? But does it mean that chaos don't make sense? So we should just abandon eating those and doing anything with that. That kind of logic, it's like I saw this very much in the early years of lightning where everyone get pushing back and saying yeah, but if not every single Bitcoin user can have their own lightning channel and use this in the non-Costodial way, than it's immediately failed. And it's like a very self-defeating approach where we're letting good be the sort of like perfect big enemy of good. We can do a lot with this technology. I by no means someone who says like this is going to be the solution for everyone and everything, but we are, you know, you're seeing it, like people are using it regardless of those opinions and using it in a very constructive way for them. So yeah. - I think that's interesting. - It's a really big evolution. I'm curious whether you see like from a lightning topology perspective, like that was in other criticism leveled in the earlier days of like, oh, it's going to centralize. It's going to be this kind of hub and spoke model. Is there a truth to that or not or how you seeing that? - I think to our point earlier of like it emerging primarily around exchanges, that is definitely a thing that happens. There's no, like we don't have data on exactly like how much, you know, how much would be concentrated from like start and the payments there, but I imagine it's very high. So there is certainly a centralization. I also think that is logical in the early stages of sale and the more payments start coming up as a use case and we're seeing this with square rolling this out to certainly have their merchants. The more that starts becoming a thing, the more people will start using Bitcoin for payments for all kinds of use cases. And the more that happens, the more I think it starts to decentralize over time as competition starts coming up, more and more wallets start emerging and people just start educating themselves better and like what else is possible with this technology? But if that early sort of like network effect and eagerness to be using lightning isn't there, even though it's not fully noncosodially yet and it's not fully decentralized across an entire network but there's like a certain concentration, then I also would like, I just don't really see the path towards like growing in a more decentralized direction either. Like this is one of those, like if you look at Bitcoin itself as well in the very early years, there were only so many people running nodes around the world as well. And like I don't have the numbers, but it's, you know, it well initially people have to mind with it but you've started out with a couple dozen in the earliest months and probably grew to hundreds and thousands eventually, but it just takes a lot of time for the network to decentralize and what we're seeing today as well is like Bitcoin network itself has tens of thousands of nodes but adoption of individuals keeps growing fast and new nodes are getting added to network. Like the total population per node is essentially, like those two things are tracking today. So you could argue the same thing for Bitcoin is like it's not decentralizing further and as a result, you know, a lot of people are using it because they're always because they're relying on someone else's node to well those two things are slightly different but basically they're trusting other parties for certain functions within Bitcoin and it's a very similar pattern. It's like should we start calling out Bitcoin there that's like not decentralizing further there either when I think if you look at all the metrics like Bitcoin is very decentralized and what is perfect decentralization as well. Don't want to get too philosophical there but, yeah, I think like it's a trajectory and I think the most important part to seeing like are people even willing to go down that path is like is there volume and activity and interest at all and if that isn't there either then? - Yeah, which I guess come back to why you're doing this report and you're showing, hey, there's growth at least on the lightning side and then even just in terms of users, I know you in some of the notes you sent there is also a growth in the like ownership or at least shifts in the ownership and like I guess that's also been a big narrative recently people talking about the so-called IPO moment this idea of the OGs are selling and they're rebalancing out of Bitcoin into other assets and this has been kind of a very prevailing narrative. What are you finding and what's your analysis been there? - So a lot of people are obviously, a lot of people are searching for like why has the price come down because they hear about it, all these institutions buying, we just put out a visual yesterday of like 3000 institutions whole Bitcoin today it's something like 90% of the top investment advisors like 60% of the top hedge funds in the US like half the banks are building Bitcoin products. People hear all of these messages they hear about Michael Saylor buying and strategy and all of these thousands of companies that have been accumulating over the past years and it makes it so hard to fathom like why is the price going down despite all of that? And I think to your point of like OG selling is like that's like what on-chain data tells us it's very hard to deny that those coins have been moving and partially it will be like moving into goal doing well AI being a very attractive area that a lot of people have been very interested in over the past year that obviously place the big role as well that it's been another flashy thing coming up which is like the same thing we saw play out in Bitcoin in 2021 when people started pursuing all kinds of other tokens and coins and same thing before the end of 2017 because people just have this idea of like wanting to get in at a good price and wanting to get the whole thing that everyone's talking about now even if rationally that makes no sense or if rationally some things are overvalued or having fundamentally changed too much and there's like lots of that's like more like investor type debates but it's certainly a trend that we've seen and you touched on one there as well like some people have just rotated their self-gustity Bitcoin into some kind of facts advantageous setup for themselves and that's like up through ETFs or through treasury companies with stocks so that's been a bit of a trend there as well I think a lot of this is also logical we have some numbers here showing sort of like how much Bitcoin has been moved by those individuals moved or sold depending on what it is exactly it's almost 700,000 Bitcoin in 2025 but it's like a 3% shift so basically started 2025 individuals had like 70% of all the Bitcoin by estimation or estimation and then by the end of the year that was 67% so that's a 3% shift it looks very daunting on a graph it's like all these people are selling they're crazy why are they selling the Bitcoin to BlackRock and Wall Street and all these guys but where else are they gonna buy it as well? 'cause before 2025 it's not like these guys are holding as much Bitcoin so logically there's gonna be some individuals who sell and I think a really big question over the lot or like kind of like the next decade or two is gonna be at what price are individuals willing to sell to the institutions as a lot of people do actually have a price not everyone does some people are like I'm holding Bitcoin forever I don't care about dollars et cetera but that's a portion of all the Bitcoiners and another portion will say if it reaches a million I will sell or if it reaches 500k or 10 million people have a price where they're willing to sell some of it most of them so we're gonna see that shift probably continue over the next decades we imagine or the businesses and the ETFs just keep buying up more yeah so as you mentioned these different trends around ownership and the patterns and yeah as you said there's been this new opening of access in terms of what loans are available to you or what facilities are available maybe they're switching into IBIT because they want to borrow against that 'cause it's a cheaper rate et cetera you know that's kind of a few things and you see these famous stories that kind of go around and we are seeing you know different institutions coming also right Silver and Welfans there are some in the U.A.E that are known to have bought are there's Luxembourg there's check national bank there is you know El Salvador there's like you know there's different countries who are a Bhutan is another big one they've been doing all this Bitcoin mining so there's like a lot of these different moves happening all around the world and I guess people were over exuberant right or in terms of how quickly that would happen and how quickly the number go up would happen and so maybe that's why some people now sort of like the sentiment is a bit down right now but the truth is there are a lot of these institutions coming in and some of them are even buying the dip so it's kind of funny that there's sort of this you know bullish news it should what should be bullish news but apparently the price is down so what do you make of that an institutional adoption? - It's unbelievable to see really like if you would have asked a bit quite like 10 years ago sort of like explained all of the things that are happening now into space and then told them what the price was at that point I think a lot of people would be very confused like wait there's so there's 3000 institutions that have it there's like 30 countries that hold Bitcoin like kind of like one way or another like how could it only be like 70k that makes absolutely no sense like what you know wouldn't it be a half a million or a million at that point like what's going on so I get a lot of people's confusion there for sure and I think the institutional adoption has been you know it's driven a lot of price action there what I think honestly what I think the biggest reason for the sentiment being down is for a lot of people is like they really wish the individual would get in a lot of big corners are like personally frustrated that their friends and family are like still dismissing it especially given that again like 60% of the top banks in the US are building products around this half the top hedge funds hold Bitcoin like the investor investment advice like all of these guys are getting in all of these big CEOs are praising it and like calling it like a phenomenal asset that they're really interested in in a variety of ways you already mentioned some of these like Southern wealth on central banks buying and despite all of that people still managed to sort of like stick their head into the sand and tell themselves like I'm too late to Bitcoin it wasn't worth it et cetera I think that's what causes a lot of individual frustration with big corners and sentiment to be down because you're like wait you have a generational opportunity right here when the prices at 7k decay to get in [BLANK_AUDIO] You hear all of these people speaking positively about it and you see in the data that they're accumulating more quarter after quarter data, you know, they're probably not even bothering to look at. But like all the evidence is there that all of the sort of like smart money keeps buying and you're still just not doing it. Like, you know, I get it that you didn't trust it in 2017, get it that you didn't trust it in 2021 with all of the crypto scams going around and no idea if this thing was going to stick around. But at this point, it's like if people still don't get it, then they have just so much frustration around that. And I think that's probably a challenge for a lot of big corners personally of like getting getting through to those people and being like, hey, come on, dude, you still have had a really phenomenal opportunity here. Because at this point, like I said earlier on, it's like a lot of people have sort of placed Bitcoin into a box in their mind and it's the wrong box, but they're probably not going to see them that until it's much too late. So that's honestly a really big challenge there. And it's just crazy to see all that institutional adoption happening and people are just like, you know, like it's still too late. And it's like, no, like what is it? Like 0.0, 2% or something like that of all money in the world is held in Bitcoin today. Yeah. I think that depends on which metric we're using. Like, if you're going by base money or M2 and M3 and so on. And then there's the, you know, the Jesse Myers kind of chart as well of like, okay, 1000 trillion of assets in the world and Bitcoin is what one and a half to the issue. This stuff is hard, yeah. You know, I just say like extremely low percentage and then seeing gold and silver add like multiple Bitcoin market gaps over a couple of days time and what then and people still think that Bitcoin couldn't move very quickly and make a lot of money for now. It's like, yeah, that's very strange to see. Yeah. I would say for the gold case, it's probably that, yes, sure, there was some individuals buying too, but I think that's really central bank driven. Like, you know, people talking about the Chinese government buying gold and so on. So it's kind of hard to, you know, compete with like a central bank, you know, literally buying that kind of money or that kind of of the asset. And I think Bitcoin is just not there yet. Right now, yes, the check national bank has bought some, but that was kind of more like a trial amount, let's say. So I think maybe it's just that institutions are coming in, but maybe just not at the size and scale that people had anticipated. But I guess on the flip side, maybe some of them are sort of slower in, but slower out too. Like they're maybe they're not as quick to kind of panic cell because they just, they are just by nature slower moving. So it's kind of interesting to see that. What about business adoption? I know you've got another section on that. Do you have any comments on business adoption? Yeah, that's, that's an error. We've been really excited about that river because like we see all the big institutions where also like, Bitcoin is at heart and we want to see as many individuals benefit from this as possible as well. It's not just like the same like wealthy institutions getting wealth here. But what we've been seeing there, like in 2025, we added like 2000 business clients to the platform. We now have over 3000, I think probably nearing 4000 at this point. And that growth has just been super fast and really exciting to see despite like price action being pretty sort of like even over much of 2025. And when we look at the types of businesses that are not adopting Bitcoin, that's the most exciting part. Like it's a really like agriculture company says, like a hairdresser, biotech company, like eye doctor, you get literally everything across the spectrum. Lots of real estate investors as well, buying Bitcoin with their companies. And that's a really exciting trend to see because it's really starting to evolve. It's like Bitcoin starting to evolve to a point where it's not just like individuals personally dating like what they perceive as a risk with it, but they also start feeling comfortable enough to say like, Hey, old is this money that I've got sitting in the treasury of my company. I should not be letting that erode through inflation. I should actually put that to work and Bitcoin's a really great way to do that. That's been a trend that we're very exciting, very excited to see. And we've been seeing a lot of growth there, not just from like obviously like micro strategy and the Bitcoin treasury companies have bought a lot of Bitcoin there over the past years. But so have a lot of these small companies that have started accumulating to be able to like position themselves strategically to be able to grow faster than their peers to be able to preserve the purchasing power that they built up. I mean, like a lot of sort of the world thrives on private businesses doing well and being able to employ people. So that's been a super powerful trend that we've seen that also interestingly enough like it exposes a lot of those employees to Bitcoin in the ways that they previously hadn't really considered where they're starting to see like, "Wait, this is really good for my business too. I've Bitcoin as well." And that's just like a super interesting Trojan horse where it gives the business owner a tool to kind of show to their business like, "Hey, this is something that can help us build and maintain our purchasing power and expand in all kinds of directions in the future." Are those business owners taking a large allocation or is it more like they come in and they might dip their toes at first? Or can you tell us a little bit about like a typical story you're seeing now on the business adoption of Bitcoin stacking side? Yeah, we obviously like, I think we see a pretty big distribution there and it's really like, it's quite easy to tell when a business owner is like a Bitcoin or at heart because I'll just put in a much larger allocation. Yeah, exactly. But you see, you also see plenty of them that like we did a survey that's in our business reports that we put out in late sort of like late last year, I think September or October or so. And we showed the exact distribution there if people are curious about the numbers. But off the top of my head, there were quite a lot of businesses that also just put in like between like one and five percent or like one and 10 percent of the assets in their treasury into Bitcoin. So they just take a small allocation which is like, statistically roughly enough to offset inflation if you take Bitcoin's average compounding annual growth rate over the past seven years. That's enough to offset inflation if it's just like a few percent. So that's how a lot of businesses use it. Not so much like, oh, I'm trying to speculate on like will this increase the value of my treasury. But much more like, I just want to use it to make sure that I'm not losing value of my treasury and just get familiar with it with a small allocation. And what we've also been seeing a lot of businesses do there is use a feature that we have on river, which is Bitcoin interest on cash. So they put their cash treasury into river and then they earn Bitcoin interest on that. And that's been interesting for a lot of companies too because then instead of buying, they are earning it through interest. And that's just another way of doing it, especially like it's nice if you, you know, might be a business owner who has a couple of co-founders or a management team and not everyone feels comfortable actually investing in Bitcoin, well, you can just earn it and not like sort of like they gone the social risk of your team thinking like what the hell is this guy doing with our treasury? That's way too much risk. What if it hurts the business? So it also just becomes easier for businesses to get in in a way where they don't need to get as much approval or internal agreement. So yeah, across the board, like we're seeing the spectrum there of like people who actually don't even buy, they just earn through interest and people who do smaller allocations and over time sort of start sizing that up or kind of like opportunistically saying like, hey, the price is a lot lower now. We had a really good quarter. Let's allocate a bunch more at the end of the quarter and you know, see where that takes us over the next one. Yeah. Well, that's my next question around that. Like are you finding that they are doing like a typical DCA every month or are they doing more like just kind of strategically trying to buy a dip here and there? What's kind of the typical strategy you see for some of these business owners who are buying Bitcoin? Yeah, again, like the pretty big distribution. Like some of them DCA indeed, like it's like whatever we have left over at the end of the week or month that we feel comfortable putting in or we just like do a specific fixed allocation. But a lot of I think like a good portion of them are very opportunistic kind of like what we have available and when we can use it, cash flow predictions are already complicated enough for businesses to then like if you also have to factor in like, you know, the like I always want to buy a thousand dollars in Bitcoin a week or so. That just adds more complexity to the mix for many of them. So a lot of them will kind of like move whenever they feel it makes most sense for them. And I think like that's, you know, it's like a prudent way of going about is like the primary focus for them should obviously be making sure their business does well. And if the business does well then that will allow them to make moves when they think it makes sense. Yeah. I'm interested. I'm curious if you have any thoughts or stats or analysis on individuals and like what's the pattern I use? Are you seeing the typical like DCA and withdrawal pattern for individuals or is it a similar kind of here? I've got a lump sum that I got from selling a property or whatever. I'm just going to load that in now. Like what what what what are you seeing there? What behavior are you seeing for the like individual customers? Yeah. A lot of a lot of Bitcoins who've gotten in over the past year, I think while the price like was like, it's key bluster. So a lot of people there have sort of preferred like dollar cost averaging, having a recurring buying just for like the don't know where the price is going. Is it going to go up a lot more or is it going to go down? Is it going to stay here for a while? I think like when people don't feel as certain where the price is going to go, that's when they like to dollar cost average more. And when people feel like, oh, I'm getting a steal right now, the price is way down like it has been over the past while. You just typically see a lot more kind of like smash buying like people spot buying as much as they're able to or setting setting up target price orders kind of imagining like the price might be lower than it is now. Let me scoop up a bunch then. So it's like it is certainly seasonal in some sense there is like the more certainty people individually feel or like the more they feel like they're getting a good deal, the more they will. We make decisions and the less certainty, the more they kind of like hedge that and play it a little bit safer. Yeah, I think it's one more note on the one more note on the business side because we had also actually asked the question you were asking like what was their behavior? We had asked them the question as well on like what sure I would look like what are you planning to do with this big coin? Are you like looking to hold on to this for the long term? Are you planning to accumulate more? Are you planning to sell some off of the price as well? And typically we saw their cross the board like I think the vast majority of people are like I'm planning to hold this for the long run and like keep accumulating more where it makes sense. So people definitely have to like long-term outlook and that's something we also see reflected with the individual clients. But that's obviously also what we target with river like we're not we're not a platform to try to draw people in as quickly as possible like maximally extract value from them and then you know we're a happy business but they're not happy. It's the opposite like we're looking to find people who want to build something up in the long run, make sure that they win and do really well. And and then we also do well as a result as a company but naturally we also we attract that so naturally it's also what we see reflected in the data. And that might not be everywhere in the industry. A lot of platforms and services and individuals. Yeah, I think the other thing that is so important for most people it's almost like we can't reiterate this enough like just DCA during the bear markets right like it is so so important because if you've been around for a while you've been you've been through you know if it's not your first rodeo. Like it is so important these stats that you stack now in the bear markets or in these big dips like they are so valuable and it's paradoxical because a lot of people don't. Don't realize that and what happens because what happens is at this time you're seeing the the typical Bitcoin bears they're out kind of doing a victory lap and they're saying well look see Bitcoin was this price whatever five years ago whatever and look you're down now you're all bunch of idiots this kind of that's the normal you know the narrative that we see every cycle right it's like clockwork but the thing is that's just comparing like point in time to point in time whereas if you were just doing DCA DCA you know every day every week maybe even every month if you're just doing that. You were like taking advantage of that volatility so that like once Bitcoin gets back again to all time highs you're just way ahead and so I think it's it's very counterintuitive like most people don't get that part and so you know I think it's just such an important thing for people to like really remember that like you've got to you've got to zoom out you've got to be long for long term focused but it's it's it's easier said than done. Yeah that's where a lot of people struggle patience and a lot of our society now when we like this concerns a lot actually like looking at how exchanges that early on start offering Bitcoin then start offering like crypto other crypto coins then when it to mean coins now are like essentially becoming like prediction and gambling markets. It's a very concerning trend to see because like I see people my age or just like why would I buy Bitcoin because I can't you know magically 100x my money if I get lucky you make a smart call like that long term mindset is disappearing for a lot of people and you have all these companies who are praying on that and kind of trying to figure out ways to you know get these people hooked or whatever. And like this is where we're very grateful with river where when people feel comfortable sending their friends and family over to us because they know that they're not going to sign up in a week later to look at an email like hey why don't you put 10% of your life savings they'll farth going because it might make you a whole bunch of money or why don't you bet on what the weather is going to be next week during this sports game combined with what the score is going to be. It's like you know seeing the entire mind shift of society towards that stuff is very concerning to see because it you know just allows at least platforms to extract as much value from people as possible. Everyone's kind of hoping for that magical hit of getting lots of money and sort of getting out of the fiat race that they're currently in whereas the coins like the polar opposite of that but people like mentally associate all of that with some kind of speculative you know like greedy. Like strange environment but they're going so different from all of that it's just the fact that it lives on the same platforms as those other activities doesn't help it's reputation either so that's like a concerning trend in general that we see and some free we definitely you know try to distance out of. So I know you've spoken about this idea of you know what is the form of evangelism that people should do or should they evangelize Bitcoin at all where you are on this question of Bitcoin evangelism. I have so many thoughts about this I've like I've gone through this with a lot of people over time. My take on it is like a lot of big corners have been to like and I totally get why but a lot of big ones have been over enthusiastically pushing this upon their friends and family and being like no comment like you really have to read this Bitcoin book or you got to listen to all of these podcasts watch these videos I'm sending you read these articles. It like for a lot of people it doesn't land in the way that the big corner enthusiastically like pushes it onto that person you have to find people kind of like where they're at us but a lot of people like to say. But it's really true like if you like a lot of people aren't going to remember what exactly you said to them about Bitcoin they're not going to remember what like you know what exact. Example you were giving or metaphor to make Bitcoin really accessible like oh it's like digital energy or whatever like people are i'm going to remember a lot of that stuff but they will just remember how you made that person feel like it's kind of like a thing for almost every topic you talk about. And when every time you bump into them you bring up Bitcoin you become that annoying Bitcoin guy who's always like pushing into their face or who is waiting for the first opportunity in a conversation to introduce Bitcoin there and remind them that they should be investing in Bitcoin and doing something with it. And if you're always like starting those conversations from like I want to introduce Bitcoin to this person or like push it into this conversation as quickly as possible then you're like you're also not really listening to them you're just waiting for an opportunity to bring it up. And that's obviously going to frustrate people because they're trying to tell you what's going on their life what they might be frustrating about. And you're like i've got the cure here it's Bitcoin just DC into Bitcoin and your life's going to get better and all these problems you're describing to me are going to go away. Like that just practically doesn't work for a lot of people like often they just want to be heard and I think one of the most powerful things that you can do is a Bitcoin or and I imagine you might have experienced this yourself stuff on. It's like your life has probably drastically changed since you've gotten into Bitcoin and the friends and family that know you and they might know you as like the Bitcoin podcast guy or whatever like this is the Bitcoin or that we know who knows so much stuff about this. But I've probably seen your life improve a lot and like you change as a person that they're even smarter or you don't want to give you too many compliments in front of all the listeners but you like they see you change as a person and they start realizing like wait why am I so why am I struggling and miserable and why do I hate all these things. But this guy's happy and he loves what he does and keeps like starting up new ventures and things or developing his life and taking things on like how can I be more like Stefan. It's kind of like just leading by example and showing people like hey, Bitcoin's making my life better and you can also talk about it more in that way rather than you need to do this or you should really be reading this or buying Bitcoin or doing that. It's like don't tell them what to do. It's a little bit more like lead by example. Show them examples that might actually resonate with them. I've gotten through for example to a lot of people like they start with the whole climate angle towards Bitcoin and they go like oh it is bad for the environment or whatnot. And instead of immediately going on the defensive and you like no no it's great and whatnot. I just start talking like I noticed project in Africa and they do this and this and that to help build up a grid there. And they're you know they're looking a bit confused so like wait why is he talking like this and stuff yeah yeah great this is an example and I talk through this and then they're like. You know like instead of pushing back against what they're saying i'm just like shifting the conversation and then kind of coming back to like. Into an interesting story that kind of draws them in from that perspective maybe and then you know if i would have said no that's not true because i know this company and they're doing good stuff and then they immediately feel like oh you're telling me this thing that i've heard in the media is not true. And like it feels like we are clashing. When we're not actually i'm like oh yeah that's yeah like and you know i could approach that from like yeah energy is a big problem all around the world. There's lots of places where they don't actually have energy grids. But i heard of this really cool story where like i've seen it in the news where they're starting to build up a micro grid in a way where it becomes much more. Like much cheaper for people much more accessible and they're starting to grow this out like a thing that has tremendous potential. Like you can kind of talk through it and ultimately arrive at a point where it's like and the way this is possible is like well they were looking for like who could. Draw this electricity during the times where it's not being used well AI can do it because it kind of need to be online all the time and then you realize like wait will these Bitcoin miners are available. And like approaching that topic from that angle totally like it's blown plenty of minds I think around the world when they came to that kind of realization. And there's a lot of conversations to be had that way rather than like picking the defensive position and like turning it into a clash because people walk away from that and not to remember remembering the facts or the examples or the articles that you shared with them. I just think like did I have a good talk with that guy like did he you know like did he listen to me that he have. Good responses to the things that I said or not they just want to remember the words and that makes a really big difference in how you talk to Bitcoin about people. So I think it's much more like just listen like try to have conversations with people make them feel good around you. Sure them how Bitcoin kind of like has improved your own life. and then introduce it at the right time. And if you screwed up with someone in the past, you can also go back over to them and just tell them, "Hey, sorry, I was a really annoying Bitcoin guy for the last three months or whatever, the last five years." But no, no, that I did that because I really care about you. And my own life has been improving so much. And I just want that for you too, because I care about you. When you approach something like this, I think for many people, it's a phase. You know, it's like when you first get into it, like, you know, I remember when I was like first getting, when I was a noob and bought my first coins in 2013, and I was, you know, shouting from the rooftops, you know, it's a phase. I think a lot of people just go through that phase of wanting everyone else to be, now, some people listen, some people didn't. The ones who listened obviously have done pretty well for themselves. And then, for a while, at least for me, I've just kind of, I see myself as like, I'm not really the first touchpoint for Bitcoin for a lot of people. Anyway, I'm sort of further down the funnel. So I've just kind of put out content and hopefully educate people about Bitcoin. But I'm not as, you know, I don't see myself as like a top of funnel guy, you know, per se. So that's kind of how I'm seeing it. I just like, let them come to me if they want to ask questions they can. But kind of if I'm talking to like, normies out there and they're not Bitcoin people or themselves, and I'll just like not even mention Bitcoin and just sort of, you know, try to talk about other things. But, you know, different approaches, like some people are really kind of skillful and really, let's say charismatic, and maybe they draw people in with a different story or humor or some emotional hawk, something like this. So, you know, just different approaches can kind of work for different people. Yeah, for sure. But I think you're right to like not be the, like the important, like just, don't be an annoying Bitcoin guy, right? Like just, you know, try to find a balance of like, how you sort of lightly spread a message without being overbearing, let's say. It's also better for yourself to just, otherwise you're gonna get so frustrated with it. And then what you do get is like a lot of people give up and just start like, well, it's just like my friends and family are the problem, like they don't get it. It's their stuff. Yeah, well, when you get into the have a fun staple side of it, where it's just like, uh, screw you, just have fun stable or and that kind of thing. Yeah, they'll get better. And then that's like going too far the other way. It's like there's a balance. There's like a happy medium of like, not chilling too hard, but also not being a, if you have fun staple sort of thing. Yeah. Yeah, so any, any closing thoughts and where can people find you online? And find the report? Yeah. No specific closing thoughts, I think. Like, I guess summarizing is like the main thing that we just found with this research in general is there are trends going on in Bitcoin that don't necessarily reflect any plus in the price. Like we see a lot of Bitcoin, a business adoption, we see more merchant adoption, we see more lightning adoption. They're not gonna bring us a flashy like multiple one and a thousand price in the short term. But it's really important sort of foundational adoption that we're seeing that is gonna help set us up for the next growth and run and whatever it is, like whatever we end up going. So that's kind of like our, I think like our overall key takeaways. Like there's not necessarily a bear market in Bitcoin adoption. It's just like sentiment and price are we done. But Bitcoin itself is like in a really interesting space. I think I really look forward to the next while and seeing how far it grows. As for where people can find me on Twitter at the world's and follow me there. If you're interested, I also post a bit from the river account as well. And you can follow river as well. If you're interested in research, you can look it up there. We'll post it. So yeah, that's where people can find me and it's been super good being on sefa. We're seeing you again. Yeah, hope to see you soon. And yeah, listen to check it out. Make sure you share this episode so people learn the truth about the lightning network. It is growing as well as adoption. And of course, check out river. everyone make sure you are DCAing in the bear market. That's it from us. Thank you.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. River's annual report estimates significant growth in the Lightning Network, with November 2025 transaction volume reaching ~$1.7 billion, a 4x increase from November 202
  2. The analysis highlights that network efficiency and liquidity management have improved, allowing high transaction volumes without a proportional increase in total locked Bitcoin capacity.
  3. A major portion of Lightning volume is driven by exchange-related activities (e.g., withdrawals, arbitrage), reflecting current user behavior where many individuals still prefer custodial services.
  4. Early narratives about Lightning adoption overemphasized universal self-custody and maximizing on-chain capacity, whereas practical use shows gradual adoption and efficient use of existing infrastructure.
  5. Bitcoin's current primary challenge is perceived as public perception and adoption, rather than technical scalability, as on-chain fees remain low and layer-2 solutions like Lightning effectively handle transaction growth.

Summary:

The discussion centers on River's annual Lightning Network adoption report, which analyzes transaction data to assess network usage and growth. 7 billion in transaction volume, marking a fourfold increase from the previous year. This growth occurs despite relatively stable public capacity metrics, indicating improved efficiency among node operators in routing payments and managing liquidity.

A key insight is that much of the volume stems from exchange-related activities, such as withdrawals and transfers, as many users still rely on custodial services rather than self-custody. The conversation also reflects on early adoption narratives, noting that initial expectations overemphasized universal self-custody and maximizing on-chain capacity, whereas real-world use shows a more gradual, pragmatic adoption curve. Finally, it is argued that Bitcoin's main challenge today is not scalability—given low on-chain fees and effective layer-2 solutions—but rather public perception and broader acceptance.

FAQs

The report aims to make complex Lightning Network data more understandable by estimating usage, transaction volume, and activity to inform stakeholders like investors, developers, and exchanges.

In November 2025, the Lightning Network processed over $1 billion in transaction volume, specifically around $1.7 billion, which is a 4x increase from the previous year.

Estimating user count is challenging due to factors like churn, lack of public reporting by exchanges, and difficulty defining what constitutes an active user (e.g., transaction frequency).

A common misconception is that adoption requires everyone to use self-custody and run their own nodes; in reality, many users start with custodial services like exchanges, which still drives volume and adoption.

Node operators have become more efficient at managing liquidity, allowing higher transaction volumes without proportionally increasing the total Bitcoin locked in channels, similar to keeping a tennis ball in play longer.

Bitcoin's biggest challenge today is its public image, as many people still incorrectly associate it with broader cryptocurrency scams and misconceptions, rather than scalability issues.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.