#133: Vervolgd voor Jodenhaat in een Amsterdams studentenblad

I had to do a lot of money in this project. Do you also want to live without a bridge? Or do you want to be able to live? Specialist in online and lens-inplantation. Live without a bridge.nl. Do you not want to live without a bridge or contact lens? Live without a bridge.nl. Do you want to live without a bridge or contact lens? Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. Live without a bridge.nl. But sometimes I don't know how it will happen in 1937. Every single one of them can come. Next journalist is a satirical column. And it falls under the freedom of opinion. But also a few ministers are seen differently. They are seen as discrimination. And the journalist is responsible for the plenary of the Jews. Today we are talking about Advocate Maart Beineberg. Maart, welcome. Thank you. You have specialized as an Advocate, who is a journalist. Well, for me, it's hard to open my heart quickly. Why do you think that's fun? Yes, it's fun. Well, as Christian said in the interview, when someone gets angry, you can expect that you're going to get into it. But when you're a journalist, of course, it's different. If you write articles or if you're a journalist, it's not right for the hands of a democratic country. That you have to be responsible for the right. And that makes this work very special. And that's why I think it's also very fun to be a journalist on the field, because it's of course very important to be in the freedom of opinion. Do you have any questions for the author? Because the author, who is a stewardess, is a stewardess. No, no, no. Well, I don't think that the author has made a difference. But he's a stewardess. - He's a stewardess. He's a stewardess. - He's a stewardess. He's a stewardess. - But if it's a coincidence, he's also a stewardess. Yes, I know. But do you have any other circumstances that you've been a journalist? So we always call that the old story about the editorial that I've said before. Then we call it "Yes, we have one again." And in the name of the Koning unit, I was on Friday, the radio, the Fox. Then I heard a short story about that. - And so I was in the role. Then I got my beer on, and I thought, "What do we do?" But that was also what I had to do. No, I never had it before, because the point is... I don't have a clear point, I don't have a clear point. It often comes down to your customer, you don't really want to read it. But if you're a stewardess, you have something from a stewardess. How do you do that? Well, there's still a lot more to come for itself. And most customers don't wait for it. - No. When I was a stewardess, she said, "Hey, what's she a journalist about me?" "Can you give me a little bit of the twig?" Yes, and there's of course a two-day aspect to it. But you're right, you're free in the fleck, so you're going to do more. But surely, as a short story, you'll start a new publication. Which, of course, is an abandoned piece of cake. But if you don't like it, you'll get a short story. She said, "Yes, because she's a journalist, she has written that she can do the job." She says, "And she's about 10/8." You can also say, "I'm leaving the publication, I'm driving." "The content of the publication, but I'm not going to get to her." Because if she doesn't like it, then that's probably my own position. So it's a difficult development, and then you're going to do that. And of course, because you're reading a media publication, you're going to pay for it. Of course, it's also going to be in the media itself. And it's going to happen here. - Sure. You know everything about the author, right? No, that's the same. I've never read it before, before I stood there. And that's really what I'm doing. And if you're a journalist, you're also a leader of it. You have the feeling of, "Yeah, you know what? You don't understand the meaning of the sentence." And then most of the others say, "No, that's a step ahead of us, but this is so important." That we're right about the sentence. At the same time, of course, that's what I'm talking about here. You're the most journalist of a good media. But you're going to pay for it. - That's what you write, that's a good thing. But also, of course, there are a lot of places in the media. Of course, there's a free group, which is a very limited edition. And I think that's the kind of media that's going to have to say. The word is just about the weather and the rules. And you also have to know Hargrenz. Mark, why did you choose this sentence? Well, I came up with a conversation with Juss in Kutte, who also has been in the broadcast for a while. We're all sure to live for things that aren't for the right hand, that you're right to come. I'm going to go for a fee, pay for it, and of course a group, which I don't know myself. - And you want to be a cooier. - And you want to be a cooier. - I want to be a cooier. And journalists are, of course, under the influence of what they have to do with the right. Of course, there are not many customers of your stature. Which of course, also makes a difference if you come to the right or if you come to the street right. And because of that, of course, I think it's also special because my client for a street right is challenged. Maybe we have to go from the right to the right. But look, it's of course, as a journalist for the right, if it's done, then it's almost a lot of procedures. - Yes, actually. - Because that's what they say. Well, I think it's better to think about it, whether it's clear or incorrect. There are all kinds of other needs to think about why something like that happens. - That's an important part of it. - Yes, but it doesn't happen often. That's the open-mindedness that says, "Hey, we can't find this everywhere. We're going to go for it. It's very beneficial for us." That doesn't happen often, and that's why it's also extremely beneficial for someone. It's a day, and in this case, it's public as an antisemitic person. Yes, because this was a journalist and he wrote for Blatt Gavana from the high school of Amsterdam. - What Blatt is that? - Yes, that's a Blatt for students. It has a wide area of about 34,000 in that time. And there are critical lasers, so they are also something used. The young people are also used to pressure what was wrong. And I know that Blatt, what is the difference between the wind and the satire? Or is it actually a bit of a brave student? Well, in any case, I can say for my client, that she is very sharp at the wind, sharp at all times. - That she is very sharp. - A sharp pen hat. And what kind of young man was he? Was he a young journalist? - What should I say? - He was a very friendly, kind-hearted man. But he then used his writing style as a fucking word. And that also came out, but yes, in this case, of course, the question was not too fucking. - Yes. - And then we also talked about that. Well, as I know that myself, I also had a chef at a restaurant. And if someone was a very pitiful guy, they would call the minister a kind of absolute joy. At a restaurant or at a medium. But sometimes you have a feeling that you say, "Maybe you have to eat this piece again." - Good village. - Yes. And I don't want to do anything about your opinion, but you can formulate something else. - And then it also comes over. - Yes. - Is there a kind of interaction? - No, there is no interaction. - Yes. So first of all, what you do after that is to say that, of course, you put in all kinds of questions. - From Stalha, but you go first with someone, because you speak. - Yes. - And then you say that you have read that column. - Yes, but that's not a question. - Yes, of course you read it. - Yes, you read it, young man. - I tell you that you read it. - Yes. - Yes, that column. - Yes. - What did you do when you read that column? - Yes. And then you read it for me, as if it were a passage. Well, yes, I thought it was a fucking column. But of course, of course, I also thought it was too hard to find the question. Because of course, I thought it was too hard to find the first rule. It's still a fucking. Since the nationality, it's not really cool, but that's the first rule. - That's what I'm talking about. - Yes, but it's going to end without a column. It's going to end without a column. It's a kind of shock, but it's going to end with the question. So, you have to enter into some process, you have to take someone's word or pen to write this. And I think that's a very important question. - But for my image, because about the history of the column, they read it. The rest of the column is actually very clear about the Israeli tourists. - Yes, that's right. - Yes, that's right. So at the beginning, I told him that he's in the post office and that he has a package there. He had to pay for it, and that there's a key to a Israeli boy. - Yes. - And the extra portal to pay for a package. Well, there's still a lot of money behind it. - Which is a kind of anti-Semitic thing. - That's right. Well, he said that at the beginning, I said to the Baalimedi workers, they said that he's a Israeli man, you're not an employee. And then he said, the column is, "Lev, the tone, I have very hard hair hair growth and hair growth." This column is well written, it has to be written, because it's in 2006. So that's a different time, right? - Maybe not, I don't know. - But you read the column, I don't think so. - Right? - But what are you going to talk to? - Yes. - And that's why I asked the question, what do you think of yourself? - What do you think of yourself? - I have the question that's in the end, director. - What do you have to say? - Do you think you're going to do this, guys? Yes, of course, I'm an enormous bummer about the freedom of management. But that's a normal question of how you're standing in it. And then the answer came, yes, I wrote that column. "The deadline is coming, I have to see the opportunity." And if I look back, then I think of... ...that word is a certain thing, not always fun. He also says in this column that he, himself, is going to do it or not. - Is that true? - Yes. He has a young boy, and he's called himself half-jose. Officially corrugated, he's still in a quarter-jose. - Okay, yes. - But that can't go up, but what's important was... ...I thought, yes, let's not make it too big. We can't make it simple. Okay, these guys, if you say in a similar tone to him... ...that's what you're talking about, because you're talking about yourself. These guys come to me with what we, on the report, would qualify. But what has to do with it, is that you have to make an opportunity. And I know, I have a strong feeling about myself, well, I know everything. And that's what these guys really mean. They also say that they're going to do it a little bit more often. They don't help you with this shit. - Yeah, that's a bit... - Yeah, that's how it works. - Okay. - What kind of a joke is that? - A joke is not a joke. - Okay. - Via, via... ...maybe via, we've heard that, we've come from via the joke. - Yes. - That's a joke, so it's an outdo sentence... ...that they've had to be serious, but that they've had to be serious... ...because they didn't agree with the school in the reduction. - That it's published. - Yes. So that was actually one person. It wasn't very big impact... ...for example, the famous organizations, such as the "Franckstichting". - CD. - CD. So I thought it was very simple, re-reducing. It was sort of a shortcut. I can't just contact with that man. Sorry, I didn't mean to do that. - Sorry, I didn't mean to do that. - Yeah. - And that's what happened. - But I'm not sure if I can come there again. - Yeah, yeah. Because this guy gets an outdo sentence... ...to go forward. - Yeah. Well, well, you've got these statements... ...they can do it themselves... ...because it's going to be hard for them... ...if it's hard for them, it's going to be hard for them. I'm sure of that, because in the introduction of the context... ...for him, called me. He said to you, "I'm proud of you." I didn't think you were good enough. Because what you know as a kind of half of the school... ...is how you can see it. That dance that you can say... ...he sees himself in that we live together. And what kind of debate or context... ...but you have to give advice for that. - Yeah. - What was the strategy? - Of course. - And there was something... ...for that you didn't know where you went. That's why he had to go out and talk about it. Why did I write this down? What was the background? - What was the idea with you, Julie? - Yeah. My idea was... ...I want to be able to see the meaning of the sentence. Exactly. But I don't want... ...to feel so extreme that you all have to be able to say... ...that we're going to quit, so I really think it's good... ...to be... ...to be... ...to be nervous, to be... ...to be prepared for the conversation. It's not like he's not behind that column. Because he still thinks... ...and I'm still proud of him, that he can write the column. I want to be able to talk to him as well. That's what he did. And also that he had spoken with the people he felt sorry for. It's a lot of stress. Of course, of course. - The old story. - No, I'm not sure. But he had already done that. He talked to me, but he gave me the answer for the answer. - That was the answer. - That was the answer. - Because he actually went through the conversation. - Yeah, what a lie. What a lie. Because he was... ...it all started very quickly in the day. He didn't know where to go because at that moment... ...he looked at it, he played around 2008. It was then a very quiet column. - Because he went back two years ago. - Yeah. So someone read it, he said, "I'm not allowed to sit on it, I'm going to do a joke." And then he said, "If you first come back in the Jewish prayer..." ...that's kind of a whirlwind storm. Today I was also sitting at this radio. He said, "Well, he's probably not allowed to do the right thing." He said, "I don't know what he's going through." - Yeah. - And of course, he's not allowed to do the right thing. - Yeah, that's kind of a fault that we... ...all probably make that we're not allowed to live in the position of someone who is not allowed to do the right thing. - No. - ...because no answer has to be allowed to do the right thing. And that was for me, of course, very difficult. Because he had already given up a column. Because of that anti-semitism, he had to come to the former room. So that means that it's going to be on the screen. - Yeah, it's going to be on the screen. - On the screen. - Okay. - That's what you're talking about. - Sorry. - Yeah. - No, but when I say that... - When I say it, when I think of... ...for that you have to do the right thing for the right thing. - That's still bitter. - Yeah. That is actually true. That it opens up a lot of ministers. We don't think we're allowed to do the right thing. We don't think we're allowed to do the right thing. You have to do the right thing on the screen. - Yeah, but I can't really see what you're saying. - Yeah. You're a client, and how you're in the state, because... You can say, "I can write this column, right?" Because that's the freedom of mind from this room. It's forgotten, because, of course, it's made up by a few ministers who are actually anti-semitismists. Because, of course, you can write a column about... ...identanimity of the Italian tourists, or the Belgian tourists, or the German tourists. But there are, of course, anti-semitical laws that... ...are based on the law, and about the nation, and... ...I think that that's not anti-semitism. Or is it that of me? And of the loss of the content? - No. - Or is this a good idea? I can write it like this. How is that possible? He found that the word choice in certain conditions was unhappy, but he certainly wasn't anti-semitical. And it was also a freedom of mind, because, of course, the term "yod" and "israeliers" was used as a whole. But that's not the first thing. He used to use it for a year, too. - Yeah, that's it. - Yeah. I thought, I thought, 1937, what was it? When it was 1933, I was at it. 1940, I was at it, of course, 1939, sorry, it was the beginning of the war. Then, of course, the conference where they had the endless war. - The war? - Yeah. - But what was it in 1937? - Well, in 1937, I also had the time to sit in a plethora of work. In 1937, it was not a special year. It was, of course, a great year, because it was a nation. - It was not a great year. - No, no. But the right was, yes, it was not a strong war. And that said, it was probably a Christmas night, and it was in 1938. - Okay. - Yeah. I think, because we're going through a little bit. Yeah, I think, I've tried the wrong way. I've bought the receiver. We said, sorry, sorry, sorry, we don't have to do this. How did the receiver react? He thought that... He just thought that he had enough of contact and he thought it was something else. - Yeah. - And he thought it was something else. - Yeah. - Why? - Yeah. Actually, I was very optimistic when I saw the phone. Then I thought, well, there is actually no need for someone to follow me. Because one person, who was angry, said that we could talk more about the order of the day. But the receiver was very irritated. He said, "I don't have anything to do with it." It's not like, "Yeah, what you're reading is a joke, so you just give it to an angry person." - That's right, Martin. - Yes, of course, you're right. So, you're right, so it means that there are only consequences. Through a gift or a visit to a request or something that a request likes. So others can't be prepared. And you really are right, of course, but you always have to think about it. And that's why I think this story is interesting. From what it is important to be prepared for this young man. And that important was what I didn't get. So that's why I did not have a responsibility for it. I don't really have a right to follow my client. And I also have been in the context for a long time. That will not be followed by wildness. What was the first thing you wanted to do? What was the first thing you wanted to do? - Well, it was a game. - That's right. The first thing you wanted to do was to play the first thing you wanted. The first thing you wanted to do was around 2010. And that was another thing. But then they were less. But that went through the defeat of the Koran. And that's why he spoke freely. But there was no consequences. It started with a mystery. The consequences that only happened in a place. Through a clasped procedure with a curse. Straks in a letter, Hoihood, is going to be uploaded in the form of a young journalist. The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." The Ancestrian column writes, "Wherefore he is being followed for the protection of Jews." We're going to talk about the principles of freedom. Of course, as an advocate, it is very fun. But of course, you never have to be an advocate for the return of your clients. So you try to make sure that they do not come to the right side. So I have really tried to deprive them of the law. Because what happened to this young columnist, Bovenut Hoft? Not so much in the sense of money. Because there is finally a statement of 700 euros. Look, there is not a lot of money. It is a sign of your money. But of course, it's going to be a sign of your money as an anti-Semite. That's a sign of money. It's a sign of the Dutch law. And that is of course very difficult. No, yes, I have just said something like that. That there is a sign of money written on me. We really need to have a right in the right direction. But it was a lot of money. It was a lot of money, a lot of money. But that is, well, if we see the right direction, something is wrong. No, that has happened. And sometimes you think, well, you have a lot of ideas that you write down here. Well, that's good. So I believe that my advocate is a different man than Mark Benberg. Because there is not yet another media of all that is going to happen. Well, of course, the right. So it's going to be a couple of things. It's going to be a lot of money. But it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. I think it's going to be a lot of money. In the first sitting, I also said, "The outing, if it's all as a sprayer, are anti-symmetism." What my client really convinced me, I'm anti-symmet. And he also has other columns over it, where it seems like he never wrote something in the right. If all the spreading is anti-symmetism, then he thinks he actually is going through the open-minded ministerial, to bring this thing through, because this thing has never happened in a day. As if it wasn't for the right, as if it was for the right. I'm going to read a few passages for that, because I think that the outside house is still thinking, "Okay, but what exactly is the opposite?" The first sentence of the nation is not really cool to say negative things about Yoda. But at some point, I'm not sure how it can be done in 1937. That's a simple sentence, isn't it? In the last few months, I've noticed that I've always been on the edge of the non-Jodes. And the third sentence, "Maybe I shouldn't have to take all the Yoda through the Mongols, because it's mainly to make the zig-zag, the Israelites are going, but honestly, we can finally go back to the very end of the country." When I saw that column, I thought, "Wow, and look, I'm reading it now, Anno 2025, and I'm reading it again, maybe I'll also have another sentence in 2006." That's what we're going to think about now. Now it feels like, "Well, if you publish this now, then I think that the book is still on the edge of it." People who are very clear about it, of course, and maybe also very well understand it. "Over the passage, what are your clients themselves?" Well, it's mainly about the first passage. Because it's, of course, a kind of link. Well, it was a bad idea. A bad idea, but that's what it's supposed to be. It's supposed to be a Holocaust, it's supposed to be. Because in both cases, in the right bank, or the head actually only has the first rule, the first thought, the strike, on the day-to-day basis, as opposed to the other one, was not related to the context. And also, look, you have to read it in your own way, right? If you read it in your own way, then you can see that it's actually someone who is responsible for their own world-sized identity. Now we have to go through it quite a lot now, but that's going to be the solution. Maybe we have to do that, right Chris? I'll read it for you. Since the National Day, it's not really cool to say negative things about Yoda. But sometimes, I don't know how it's going to be in 1937 or so. Maybe it sounds strange to me that I haven't seen half-Jodhs before. For real, the Yoda doesn't tell that because my mother is probably one of my parents. But fuck, I would also be happy about that. But in the last few months, I've noticed that I have always been in conflict with the other side of the New Yoda state. And of course, of course, not on the children's rights, but on the road between Israel and Lebanon, Orthodoxy, the Winkle in Stedas, New York and London, and mainly on Israeli tourists in the outside of the country. Maybe I shouldn't have to keep all the Yoda through my mother because that's my purpose. In order to make my mother sick, Israel is going to do it. But honestly, from the end, we can all turn back to the safe country. I came to this concentration for the first time when I was in Egypt. A couple of days in the Sinai-Yirot-Soustime area. The way of the Lefgoserts and the advantageous Greek-suitella-fifth, there are the most expensive Egypt-suitings, all the Persians went to the outside. A completely different authoritarian tone, as if it were against their own dogs. Had they been so close to each other and had I been in the city of an explosive, then you would have to go back to the Sharmalsjijk and the Hap. Well, my dear Ergenis is from a recent date, yesterday, in order to be precise. I was at the Rij in the Rij at the Post-Contour, at the Bali, where you could pick up your packages. I was close to the bird, but only a beautiful young man from the year of the 26th. Unfortunately, it was an Israelian. From the moment I met him in typical accent English, I recognized him in the middle. A thousand of the Germans heard about a pack where he wanted to pay extra money for it. Always money. I knew that it was expensive. You're not a good employee. He said to me ten minutes ago, an idealist just through the other side of the Bali. The tone of life. I had very hard hair hair loss, and I ran away. That's what I was talking about. This is the context. This is the context. Well, of course, that's probably also a good thing about the air industry. That's not very important, right? Of course, you're driving around the first scene. Or the nationality, of course, that everything is written from 1937 to 30 years later. But if the right side of the air industry is in the right direction, the context in the air industry is done. In the context, of course, the whole column is made up of a good column. The fact that it is a column, of course, is a certain artistic freedom of expression. So in that moment, I thought, well, did you read the column from the beginning? Because you notice that it's just a kind of rent against Israelians. It was called with qualifications about Jews and connected with the Holocaust, which is, by the way, a slight pressure to say something like that. Yes. What's the core of your interview with Rehpank? In the first episode? Yes, it was a low-level interview. Yes. The first was, of course, that I thought that I would not be successful. By the way, the fact that we actually have a conflict between him and the genes that were born was dissolved. Yes. And then, I have, for example, a certain extent, of course, about the freedom of meaning. Yes. I think that the freedom of meaning is that if you follow this, that means, of course, that means that then they call it the humanistic chilling effect, right? It means that you don't have more a certain freedom to be able to overcome it, to be able to support it, to be able to showcase it, to be able to support it, to be able to support it. And that that is just an exception from the democratic values, because what I want to ask for. Because that freedom of meaning is, of course, a fundamental thing. Yes, that's very important. That's a cornerstone of our society. That's why you can be critical on everything and everyone. Well, it's important that you also have evidence. As the first question, the right to answer this question is the statement as evidence to notice it. Well, the first statement is followed by the first statement. Yes, that can be interpreted as evidence. But then there is still not enough. The next question is the context, the form, the appearance, the artistic expression, the person that it is. That the image character becomes anonymous, also becomes open to it, also becomes open to it. That creates the debate or the creates discussion that plays. So you can't read it, not every reading or every group's reading is a punishment, but it really takes a lot of action. In which context and which form is it done? And that can't be unnoticed. And that's of course also a secret. Yes, but what is unnoticed? What is unnoticed? So that also makes it a dynamic and fluid. And of course there is also some artistic freedom. That people don't have to censor things about what they are going to write. And what I really like is that the head actually looks at the body itself. What is this now? What is this to do to make it easy to live on? But the right to answer is actually still a step further through the look of who this person is. And what we can do is have an antisemitic view towards us. And the right to answer is also in the background. We also read all those other columns. And there is also no circle of antisemitism to find. And we can't put this person in place. And that of course also depends on the need. You have to be open to my theory. And finally, as an example of the right, you don't have to look at the difference. It is important that the right to be opposed. But not someone who flies from the side again. As my client does. And there I made a mistake to understand why I thought that he was from the side. And that's why I had to stay with him. - A successor? - Yes. What is interesting is that you can make the comparison with the political. The political is also the reason for the decision of the United States. You can do more. - You can do more. - You can do more. You can do more. Because they take the political public debate. They have to be able to make the right decision if it is possible. At the same time, we have a political extra-frontal authority. - Right. - Because of the policies they have. But if you look at a political person who has been in the crisis for years, for example, immigration. You say, "Forgive, but in a different debate, say things." If the government could be the cause of the conflict in the country, I would say, "What?" - You can actually say that. - Well, that can be a reason. You can say that it can be a situation of the government. It can be a conflict. But then the context that has happened. And that's what you think. You say, "There are other columns, look at that from what we have here." It also fits, but it becomes clear that in a wider context of what this way, or this woman, is all humanity in front of her. - What does the government want? - The government wants to talk about their freedom. - And then? - Then I thought it was clear. - Yes. - But you came up with an idea. - Really? - Yes. - What do you think about that? - Of course, it's about that idea that has already been established. - Well, with a deep search, you take it from the knowledge of it, and then you think, "Yes, we have to do it again." - Do we still think so? - Yes, look at yourself, of course, what Christian just said. As a lawyer, he is all pretty. - Yes. - And the freedom of the government has changed. - Yes. - In the second round. - That's what I'm saying. - Help yourself. - Yes. - We've got money, we're going to do it. - Yes, we're going to do it. - But there is of course also a system in which you say, "This is actually us." - This guy just had to get involved in it, and then he also has a open right to it, and then we'll go back to the right. - Yes, unfortunately, what I'm also asking, is unfortunately also a kind of social discussion on a lot of things that we want to do. - That's a lot of things to do. - Yes. - I often play with the right bank, then it's a lot of tumult. - Yes. - That's relatively beautiful, of course, too, right? - And then Pel... - That was a bit easier. - Yes. - Because I don't have any control of it. - No. - No. - And then in the half of the group, was it more or less a media circus? - No, it's a bit of a piece of it. - It's a bit of a piece of it. - And then you notice that something, actually, is picked up by jurists, who will find it very interesting. But luckily, for a client, because it's of course that open right is quite difficult. But if you're also sitting in front of a full table, then it won't be better. - But it also makes you feel like you're working on something. - And then you have the first thing you do with the right bank, with all the money, then you'll be asked for it. - Yes. - Then you can go to the government, go to the government, and that's really going to be a juridious debate, actually. - Yes. - Do you make it for you that you're... - Well, you're still a juridious person, or else you're going to get involved. - Yes. - We'll be dealing with European government affairs. - And finally, there's still a step ahead, right? - Oh, yes. - Which of course, of course, doesn't... - Of course, in the first episode, you have to think that you're doing a lot of things, but in fact, there's a lot going on for it. - I'll tell you the truth. - I'll tell you a little bit more about going deeper and more about searching for items. - But also the weaker items, of course, fill them out. - Yes. - Do you prefer to put things in your hands in the first episode? - It was a real story. - It was actually a story from Sittenfeuzeverek, but... - But... - Yes. - That's the truth. - That you thought about it all, right? - And? - What does it work? - Yes, it's called Freysprach. - Oh. - I thought, well, we could end the show. - For the second time, and then? - Yes. - Then you know the castration and stuff. - You, you get me. - Yes. - And what did you do? How deep was it when you were searching? - Well, well, a little bit deeper in the sense that there isn't any open-minded direction anymore. - I think it's going up to the height, but I think it's hard to... ...to go through to someone who is not really an anti-Semitic sentiment. - Do you have any idea where that came from? - Look, that's open-minded, of course, of course, of course, for the causes of these things. - Yes. - And I don't want to be negative about it, but in this case, I think there's a wrong... ...for the cause is through it, that anti-Semitic sentiment, through the thinking that he's anti-Semitic and that's why it's hard. What the castration has done, as I said, I think it's a lot of evidence to see how it is in this way. What does it write normally? And we place it in a so big, possible context. - Yes. - And we speak in a free way, because we don't think that journalists... ...have to speak or write in a way that they can't do this anymore. - Maybe you have an idea that Obama and Mr. Steer, who are in this quest... ...will also create a lawsuit against the anti-Semitic sentiment. - But also a kind of a disdainment, for example, or... - Of course, of course, of course. - Yes, that would be possible. The question is, of course, about Mr. Steer's home, but then I always find it important to see... ...whether you need to help there, because there's also a person behind it, and that's my client. - Yes, the electric kid is normal. - Yes. And then, finally, for your student, it's like they're not waiting for you either. - No. - Well, on the other hand, right? - Do you have something to do with that? - Yes, I always had full attention. - Yes, I think so. - Look, there are enough people who stay with you. - I don't want you to stay with me, but it's a good idea. - Yes. And also because it's not... So you tell me, it's not about doing. - No. - So it's not about looking at how I can make this clear, that freedom of speech. - No. - What kind of punishment does this happen? - Yes, there is a conclusion written in which, in fact, it is advisable to make it happen. That is, if you want to make it happen, it's not about the freedom of speech. - Yes. - But that's still quite a thing, because at the moment, at the high level, the conclusion of the African General, which is sort of an independent citizen of the high level, the freedom of speech that is not in the order, that actually needs a new balance. Look at ten times, it becomes a conclusion of the African General, so when you get into it, you really read it all the time. - Yes. - But... - Yes. - What do you mean by that? The institute is not going to allow us to do that. - The system has worked. - Yes. - It was a waste of money. - Yes. - Even though we know it's a question. If this was actually a game we have... In 2000, let's say, it was in 2005... That would still be a huge thing. - I can't remember this one. - That's from the West. - But that doesn't say anything, but... - Well, for now, in articles we've been talking about... also with the column of Herman Bristlemancy, of course. Because with that, in Belgium, maybe the right... - Yes, that was a pity column. - Yes. A pity column. And the question is, of course, what would happen now? So, I don't think you could say that there's still a lot more to build. Well, of course, if you write this as a column in a geopolitical situation... that is under high tension, and so is it now. Then you're going to be really a kind of blond in a circle. But what also happened in the past, is that I thought... that the same thing happened when this column wasn't about... about Jorne Schuunestreb, is it about the same thing as... when the Muslims were actually going to be going. But that's also a matter of damage, right? Yes, but look, as I said, I think it's a bit of a misunderstanding... that Arrest was going to be a bit of a problem. - That's not a big deal. - No, no, no. We're going to look through it. Well, if you could say that they're going to have to be the same as they are now... - if they're going to be the same. - Yes, let's look at it as well. Look, I'm going to see what they've got to say. Well, there's a lot of evidence on that. But it's very clear that the column is... that the column is about to be able to find a platform... that there's also not a large number of qualifications in it. But actually, on the hand of the scheme, what the European head said... but oh, it's been brought forward. And you see the context says, yes, this is not... the terrible character of Groesbleen. And if you're going to look at the Muslims, or if you're going to be in the house of time... - You're going to be in the same age as Jorne. - I'm not going to be in the same age. - I'm not going to be in the same age as Jorne. - No, I'm not going to be in the same age as Jorne. But the main thing is that they're going to have to be the same... They're going to have to be the same. They're going to have to be the same. They're going to have to be the same. They're going to have to be the same. They're going to have to be the same. They're going to have to be the same. They're going to have to be the same. They're going to have to be the same. They're going to have to be the same. They're going to have to be the same. They're going to have to be the same. They're going to have to be the same. They're going to have to be the same. They're going to have to be the same. They're going to have to be the same. They're going to have to be the same. They're going to have to be the same. They're going to have to be the same. They're going to have to be the same. Did you write your client or did you write columns? No, I wrote them. I wrote them. I wrote them. No, it's a music journalist. Oh, look. So it's a less recent... Underwear. Yes, you can. You can write a book in the background. But it's a less recent. You can also write a book in the background. But to come back to the question, I still have a lot of trust in the right. That that rule is also still possible. Yes. Yes. I think so. How do you look back at these things? Yes, I do have a lot of trust in the right. Because the outcome, of course, was a huge risk. But also with a little concern that... that an opera... So long... So long. So long. And that was what I didn't have enough to press it out. But it's been a while, thanks for this story from our studio. Thanks a lot. This was Napleiten. And before I end it, nice news. Our other podcast, "Proforma", where we talk about media and social media every week... is the coming months for everyone to be happy. So subscribe to "Proforma". Then stay on top of everything. My name is Wautel Lammons and after me is the co-host of Advocate Cristian Flogstra. Tips to support Napleiten at bnr.nl. We're also going to follow you on Instagram. Thank you for watching and see you again next time.